Book contents
- Market Studies
- Market Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: The Multiple Pasts, Presents and Futures of Markets and Market Studies
- Part I Market Designs and Market Misfires
- Part II Post-Performative Approaches to Studying Markets
- Part III Valuation
- Part IV Markets in Motion: Places and Spaces
- Part V The Secret Life of Market Studies Methods
- Part VI Broadening the Perspectives in Market Studies
- Part VII Future (Im)Perfect Markets
- Chapter 28 Digital Platforms and (Im)Perfect Market Futures
- Chapter 29 Reconfiguring Visibility and Participation in a Digitalizing World
- Chapter 30 Market Futures and the Role of Market Studies in the Making of Circular Economies
- Chapter 31 Making Room for Care in Markets and in Market Studies
- Index
- References
Chapter 29 - Reconfiguring Visibility and Participation in a Digitalizing World
from Part VII - Future (Im)Perfect Markets
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 November 2024
Book contents
- Market Studies
- Market Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: The Multiple Pasts, Presents and Futures of Markets and Market Studies
- Part I Market Designs and Market Misfires
- Part II Post-Performative Approaches to Studying Markets
- Part III Valuation
- Part IV Markets in Motion: Places and Spaces
- Part V The Secret Life of Market Studies Methods
- Part VI Broadening the Perspectives in Market Studies
- Part VII Future (Im)Perfect Markets
- Chapter 28 Digital Platforms and (Im)Perfect Market Futures
- Chapter 29 Reconfiguring Visibility and Participation in a Digitalizing World
- Chapter 30 Market Futures and the Role of Market Studies in the Making of Circular Economies
- Chapter 31 Making Room for Care in Markets and in Market Studies
- Index
- References
Summary
The proliferation of digital technologies is changing the face of markets and society. This on-going market digitalization represents an opportunity for Market Studies – a field that has long considered the role of technologies in markets. Careful inquiry into market digitalization allows for continued agnostic and descriptive research, but also prompts us to consider the human outcomes of market arrangements. This chapter explores how the digitalization of markets affects human relationships and experiences. Basing our argument on a review of contemporary scholarship on market digitalization, we suggest that digitalization reconfigures both visibility and participation in markets. This typology actualizes how everyday human market interaction is changing, exemplified through the figures of the consumer, the influencer, and the activist. We find that Market Studies is in a strong position to address technologies as it already considers several roles in markets: as market devices, objects of exchange, as well as market infrastructures. We propose that Market Studies should continue to explore differences in market arrangements, as well as the significant variability among the people interacting in digitalizing markets.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Market StudiesMapping, Theorizing and Impacting Market Action, pp. 473 - 484Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Ahmed, I. (2017) The evolution of social media influencers [infographic]. Social Media Today, 17 August. Available at www.socialmediatoday.com/social-business/evolution-social-media-influencers-infographic (accessed 27 September 2019).Google Scholar
Araujo, L., and Mason, K. (2021) Markets, infrastructures and infrastructuring markets. AMS Review, 11(3/4), 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barassi, V. (2019) Datafied citizens in the age of coerced digital participation. Sociological Research Online, 24(3), 414–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauvisage, T., and Mellet, K. (2020) Mobile consumers and the retail industry: the resistible advent of a new marketing scene. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(1), 25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, S. (2019) Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip. New Media & Society, 21(11/12), 2589–2606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, S. (2021) Influencer management tools: algorithmic cultures, brand safety, and bias. Social Media+ Society, 7(1), DOI: 10.1177/20563051211003066.Google Scholar
Bosch, T. (2017) Twitter activism and youth in South Africa: the case of #RhodesMustFall. Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighenti, A. (2007) Visibility: a category for the social sciences. Current Sociology, 55(3), 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucher, T (2012) Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1164–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, J. (2016) How the machine ‘thinks’: understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay, in Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 196–233.Google Scholar
Callon, M (2007) What does it mean to say that economics is performative?, in MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L. (eds.), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 311–357.Google Scholar
Cochoy, F. (2011) ‘Market-things inside’: insights from Progressive Grocer (United States, 1929–1959), in Zwick, D., and Cayla, J. (eds.), Inside Marketing: Practices, Ideologies, Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 58–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochoy, F., Trompette, P., and Araujo, L. (2016) From market agencements to market agencing: an introduction. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochoy, F., Licoppe, C., McIntyre, M. P., and Sörum, N. (2020) Digitalizing consumer society: equipment and devices of digital consumption Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotter, K. (2019) Playing the visibility game: how digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz Ruiz, C. (2022) The insights industry: towards a performativity turn in market research. International Journal of Market Research, 64(2), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donner, J., and Escobari, M. X. (2010) A review of evidence on mobile use by micro and small enterprises in developing countries. Journal of International Development, 22(5), 641–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eli, K., Dolan, C., Schneider, T., and Ulijaszek, S. (2016) Mobile activism, material imaginings, and the ethics of the edible: framing political engagement through the Buycott app. Geoforum, 74, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, M., and Healy, K. (2017) Seeing like a market. Socio-Economic Review, 15(1), 9–29.Google Scholar
Frenken, K., and Schor, J. (2019) Putting the sharing economy into perspective, in Mont, O. (ed.), A Research Agenda for Sustainable Consumption Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, C. (2019) Smart consumers come undone: breakdowns in the process of digital agencing. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(15/16), 1542–1562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, C., Bäckström, K., and Svingstedt, A. (2017) Smartphones and the reconfiguration of retailscapes: stores, shopping, and digitalization. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 39, 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, C., and Fuentes, M. (2022) Infrastructuring alternative markets: enabling local food exchange through patchworking. Journal of Rural Studies, 94, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, C., and Sörum, N. (2019) Agencing ethical consumers: smartphone apps and the socio-material reconfiguration of everyday life. Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(2), 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, D. A., and Hoppner, J. J. (2013) Global marketing managers: improving global marketing strategy through soft skill development. International Marketing Review, 30(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagberg, J., and Kjellberg, H. (2020) Digitalised markets. Consumption Markets & Culture, 23(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgesson, C.-F., and Kjellberg, H. (2005) Macro-actors and the sounds of the silenced, in Czarniawska, B., and Hernes, T. (eds.), Actor-Network Theory and Organizing. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press, 145–164.Google Scholar
Hill, K. (2022) A dad took photos of his naked toddler for the doctor: Google flagged him as a criminal. New York Times, 21 August. Available at www.nytimes.com/2022/08/21/technology/google-surveillance-toddler-photo.html (accessed 16 January 2023).Google Scholar
Jamil, S. (2021) From digital divide to digital inclusion: challenges for wide-ranging digitalization in Pakistan. Telecommunications Policy, 45(8), DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katell, M., et al. (2019) An algorithmic equity toolkit for technology audits by community advocates and activists. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv e-prints.1912.02943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitchin, R. (2017) Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, H., Hagberg, J., and Cochoy, F. (2019) Thinking market infrastructure: barcode scanning in the US grocery retail sector, 1967–2010, in Kornberger, M., et al. (eds.), Thinking Infrastructures. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, H., and Helgesson, C.-F. (2007) On the nature of markets and their practices. Marketing Theory, 7(2), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, H., and Stigzelius, I. (2014) Doing green: environmental concerns and the realisation of green values in everyday food practices, in Geiger, S., Harrison, D., Kjellberg, H., and Mallard, A. (eds.) (2014) Concerned Markets: Economic Ordering for Multiple Values. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 203–237.Google Scholar
Köchling, A., and Wehner, M. C. (2020) Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research, 13(3), 795–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1997) A few steps toward an anthropology of the iconoclastic gesture. Science in Context, 10(1), 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2007) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, T. W. L. (2021) ‘How it actually works’: algorithmic lore videos as market devices. New Media & Society, 25(6), 1412–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellet, K., and Beauvisage, T. (2020) Cookie monsters: anatomy of a digital market infrastructure. Consumption Markets & Culture, 23(2), 110–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., and Callon, M. (2007) An introduction to market devices, in Callon, M., Millo, Y., and Muniesa, F. (eds.), Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–13.Google Scholar
Nicolini, D. (2009) Articulating practice through the interview to the double. Management Learning, 40(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., and Stienstra, M. (2004) Configuring the user as everybody: gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(1), 30–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, N., and Williams, R. (2016) How Industry Analysts Shape the Digital Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poon, M. (2007) Scorecards as devices for consumer credit: the case of Fair, Isaac & Company Incorporated. The Sociological Review, 55(2S), 284–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravenelle, A. J. (2019) Hustle and Gig: Struggling and Surviving in the Sharing Economy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rokka, J., and Moisander, J (2009) Environmental dialogue in online communities: negotiating ecological citizenship among global travellers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, P., and Chillas, S. (2014) The state of affairs: critical performativity and the online dating industry. Organization, 21(6), 797–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A., Stigzelius, I., Mejri, O., Hopkinson, G., and Hussien, F. (2023) Agencing the digitalised marketer: exploring the boundary workers at the cross-road of (e)merging markets. Marketing Theory, 23(3), 463–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruckenstein, M., and Granroth, J (2020) Algorithms, advertising and the intimacy of surveillance. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(1), 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sismondo, S (2010) The prehistory of science and technology studies, in An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: John Wiley, 1–11.Google Scholar
Sörum, N., and Fuentes, C. (2023) How sociotechnical imaginaries shape consumers’ experiences of and responses to commercial data collection practices. Consumption Markets & Culture, 26(1), 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soutjis, B (2020) The new digital face of the consumerist mediator: the case of the ‘Yuka’ mobile app. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(1), 114–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Krieken, R. (2019) Georg Franck’s ‘The Economy of Attention’: mental capitalism and the struggle for attention. Journal of Sociology, 55(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venturini, T., Bounegru, L., Gray, J., and Rogers, R. (2018) A reality check (list) for digital methods. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4195–4217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertesi, J. (2014) My experiment opting out of big data made me look like a criminal. Time, 1 May. Available at https://time.com/83200/privacy-internet-big-data-opt-out (accessed 17 January 2023).Google Scholar
Woolgar, S. (1990) Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. The Sociological Review, 38(S1), 58–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuboff, S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar