Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:35:26.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Foreword

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2012

Kevin Noble Maillard
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, School of Law
Rose Cuison Villazor
Affiliation:
Hofstra University, School of Law
Get access

Summary

On or about June 12 each year since 2004, Loving Day – “an educational campaign and a global network of annual celebrations” – holds a “Flagship Celebration” in New York City to commemorate the anniversary of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Loving v. Virginia. In 2009, according to the website Blended People of America, the sixth annual Loving Day celebration in New York City “saw the gathering of about 1,100 people.… From 3 to 7 pm, guests mingled, heard and exchanged stories, danced to music, looked over the riverfront, created artwork, or gathered as families in a warm and welcoming environment.”

Loving Day presents itself as a quintessentially post-racial celebration. The Loving Day organizers, and their website, look back respectfully and gratefully to the Lovings, whose legal struggle made it possible for Americans of different racial identities to dance, marry, kiss, form families, and celebrate beauty, pleasure, and desire without fear of police or prisons. Now, in the new fluid reality that Loving Day celebrates, even the concept of “miscegenation” has begun to seem bizarre and antiquated. The very idea of race mixing assumes that there is purity to be lost. The “blended people” who come together for Loving Day, however, represent themselves as already various – each a tapestry of ethnicities, religions, racial identities, and cultures. Mixing, in this new context, does not represent a falling-away from purity and strength. Instead, mixing takes on a postmodern meaning. Loving Day celebrants see their mixed backgrounds as making possible deep, complex, rich identities layered with history, custom, and meaning, in the way that a deejay mixes beats, melodies, and rhythms to make deep, rich, funkier layers of sound.

Type
Chapter
Information
Loving v. Virginia in a Post-Racial World
Rethinking Race, Sex, and Marriage
, pp. xv - xviii
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Nussbaum, Martha C. 2004
Goffman, Erving 1959
Zimbardo, Philip 2007
Milgram, Stanley 2009
Jacobson, Matthew 1998

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×