Adams, M. 1987. Ockham, 2 vols. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press

Adams, R. M. 1994. Leibniz. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Aiton, E. J. 1985. Leibniz. A Biography. Bristol: Adam Hilger

Allison, H., ed. 1974. The Kant-Eberhard Controversy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press

Andreu, A., Echeverría, J., and Roldán, C., eds. 2002. Ciencia, Tecnología y bien común: La actualidad de Leibniz. Valencia: Editorial U. P. V.

Anonymous. 1745. Virorum Celeberr. God. Gul. Leibnitii et Johann. Bernoulli Commercium philosophicum et Mathematicum. Lucerne and Geneva: Bousquet

Antognazza, M. R. 1999. “Immeatio and emperichoresis: The Theological Roots of Harmony in Bisterfeld and Leibniz,” in S. Brown, ed. 1999:41–64

Antognazza, M. R. 2001. “Debilissimae Entitates?: Bisterfeld and Leibniz's Ontology of Relations.” The Leibniz Review 11:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arkell, R. L. 1939. Caroline of Ansbach: George the Second's Queen. New York: Oxford University Press

Arthur, R. T. 1989. “Russell's Conundrum: On the Relation of Leibniz's Monads to the Continuum,” in J. R. Brown and J. Mittelstrass, eds. 1989:171–201

Arthur, R. T. 1997. “Symposium on Beeley.” Leibniz Society Review 7:25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avramov, I. 1999. “An Apprenticeship in Scientific Communication: The Early Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg (1656–63).” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 53:187–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, W. H. 1955. Leibniz in France from Arnauld to Voltaire: A Study in French Reactions to Leibnizianism, 1670–1760. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press

Baruzi, J. 1907. Leibniz et l'organisation religuese de la terre d'apres des documents inédits. Paris: F. Alcan

Baumgarten, A. 1779. Metaphysica, 7th edition. Halle, Germany: Hemmerde

Bayle, P. 1697. Dictionnaire Historique et Critique, 1st edition. Rotterdam: Reinier Leers. Cited by volume and page

Beck, L. W. 1969. Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Beeley, P. 1996a. Kontinuität und Mechanismus. Zur Philosophie des jungen Leibniz in ihrem ideengeschichtlichen Kontext. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag

Beeley, P. 1996b. “Points, extension and the mind-body problem,” in R. S. Woolhouse, ed. 1996:15–36

Beeley, P. 1999. “Mathematics and Nature in Leibniz's Early Philosophy,” in S. Brown, ed. 1999:123–145

Beeley, P. 2002. “Leibniz on Scientific Controversy,” in A. Andreu, J. Echeverría, and C. Roldán, eds. 2002:215–226

Beeley, P. and Scriba, C. J., eds. 2003. Correspondence of John Wallis (1616–1703), Volume 1 (1641–1659). Oxford: Oxford University Press

Belaval, Y. 1962. Leibniz: Initiation à sa philosophie. Paris: J. Vrin

Berkeley, G. 1710. A Treatise concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Dublin: Pepyat. Reprinted in G. Berkeley 1948–1957, Volume 2. Cited by section

Berkeley, G. 1944. Philosophical Commentaries, Generally Called the Commonplace Book. Ed. by A. A. Luce. London: Nelson. Reprinted in Berkeley, G. 1948–1957, 2. Cited by section

Berkeley, G. 1948–1957. The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, 9 vols. Ed. by A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop. London: Nelson

Bernstein, H. 1980. “Conatus, Hobbes, and the Young Leibniz.” Studies in the History of Science 11:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, D. 1993. Equivalence and Priority. Newton versus Leibniz. Including Leibniz's Unpublished Manuscripts on the Principia. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Bertoloni, Meli D. 1999. “Caroline, Leibniz, and Clarke.” Journal of the History of Ideas 60:469–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birch, T. 1756–1757. The History of the Royal Society of London for Improving of Natural Knowledge, 4 vols. London: A. Millar. Reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1968

Blondel, M. 1930. Une énigme historique: Le “vinculum substantiale” d'après Leibniz et l'ébauche d'un réalisme supérieur. Paris: J. Vrin

Boas, Hall M. 1975. “The Royal Society's Role in the Diffusion of Information in the Seventeenth Century.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 29:173–192Google Scholar

Boas, Hall M. 1978. “Leibniz and the Royal Society 1670–76.” Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa 17:171–182Google Scholar

Boas Hall, M. 2002. Henry Oldenburg: Shaping the Royal Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Bodéüs, R. 1993. Leibniz-Thomasius, Correspondence, 1663–1672. Paris: J. Vrin

Bogen, J. and McGuire, J., eds. 1985. How Things Are. Dordrecht: D. Reidel

Bouillier, F. 1868. Histoire de la philosophie Cartésienne. Paris: C. Delagrave et cie

Breger, H. 1984. “Elastizität als Strukturprinzip der Materie bei Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft 13:112–121Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. 1975. Leibniz: An Introduction Ed. by C. Lewy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Brown, G. 1988. “Leibniz's Theodicy and the Confluence of Worldly Goods.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26:571–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, J. R. and Mittelstrass, J., eds. 1989. An Intimate Relation. Dordrecht: Kluwer

Brown, S. 1984. Leibniz. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press

Brown, S. 1990. “Christian Averroism, Fideism and ‘the Two-Fold Truth’,” in G. Vesey, ed. 1990:207–223

Brown, S. 1996. “Leibniz's New System Strategy,” in R. S. Woolhouse, ed. 1996: 37 –61

Brown, S. 1998. “Body, Soul and Natural Immortality.” The Monist 81:573–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, S. ed. 1999. The Young Leibniz and his Philosophy (1646–1676). Dordrecht: Kluwer

Busche, H. 1997. Leibniz' Weg ins perspektivische Universum: Eine Harmonie im Zeitalter der Berechnung. Hamburg: Felix Meiner

Clarke, S. 1717. A Collection of Papers which passes between the late Learned Mr. Leibnitz and Dr. Clarke, In the Years 1715 and 1716. Relating to the Principles of Natural Philosophy and Religion. London: James Knapton

Clauberg, J. 1664. Disputationes Physicae. Published as a part of a series of related works, with an introduction by Johannes de Raey and entitled Physica, Quibus Rerum Corporearum Vis & Natura, Mentis ad Corpus Relatae Proprietates, denique Corporis ac Mentis Arcta & Admirabilis in Homine Conjunctio Explicantur. Amsterdam: D. Elsevier

Corr, C. A. 1975. “Christian Wolff and Leibniz.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36:241–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corr, C. A. 1980. “Christian Wolff's German Metaphysics Volumes, Their Revisions, and Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa 21:231–239Google Scholar

Couturat, L. 1901. La Logique de Leibniz. Paris: Alcan

Cover, J. A. and O'Leary-Hawthorne, J. 1999. Substance and Individuation in Leibniz. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Cram, D. and Maat, J., eds. 2001. George Dalgano on Universal Language. The Art of Signs (1661), The Deaf and Dumb Man's Tutor (1680), and the Unpublished Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Dascal, M. 1978. La Sémiologie de Leibniz. Paris: Aubier Montaigne

Dascal, M. 1987. Leibniz. Language, Signs and Thought. A Collection of Essays. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Della, Rocca M. 1994. “Mental Content and Skepticism in Descartes and Spinoza.” Studia Spinozana 10:19–42Google Scholar

De Raey, J. 1654. Clavis Philosophiae Naturalis sive Introductio ad Contemplationem Naturae Aristotelico-Cartesiana, Leiden: J & D. Elsevier

Desmaizeaux, P. 1720. Receuil de diverses Pièces sur la Philosophie, la Religion naturelle, l'Histoire, les Mathematiques etc. par Mrs Leibniz, Clarke, Newton et autres Autheurs célèbres. Amsterdam: Sauzet

Digby, K. 1651. Demonstratio immortalitatis animae rationalis, sive tractatus duo philosophici […] Praemittitur huic Latinae editioni Praefatio metaphysica, authore Thoma Anglo ex Albiis Eastsaxonum. Paris: Villery and Iosse

Dobbs, B. J. T. 1991. The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton's Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press

Döring, D. 1996. Der junge Leibniz und Leipzig: Ausstellung zum 350. Geburtstag von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz im Leipziger Alten Rathaus, Berlin: Akademie Verlag

Duchesneau, F. 1993. Leibniz et la méthode de la science. Paris: Presses universitaires de France

Duchesneau, F. 1994. La dynamique de Leibniz. Paris: J. Vrin

Earman, J. 1977. “Perceptions and Relations in the Monadology.” Studia Leibnitiana 9:212–230Google Scholar

École, J. 1990. La Métaphysique de Christian Wolff. Hildesheim: Georg Olms

Eustachius a Sancto Paulo. 1648. Summa philosophiae quadripartita. Cambridge. 1st edition. Paris, 1609

Eze, E. 1997. Race and the Enlightenment: A Reader. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell

Fardella, M. 1683. Restitutae ac methodicae philosophiae et matheseos praecipuae et utiliores assertiones. Rome

Fardella, M. 1691a. Universae Philosophiae Systema. In quo nova quadam, et extricata Methodo, Naturalis Scientiae et Moralis fundamenta explanantur. Tomus Primus. Rationalis et emendatae Dialecticae specimen tradens […]. Venice

Fardella, M. 1691b. Universae usualis mathematicae theoria. Venice

Fardella, M. 1698. Animae humanae natura ab Augustino detecta. Venice

Femiano, S. 1979. Ricerca su Michelangelo Fardella, filosofo e matematico (1650–1718). Cassino

Femiano, S. 1982. “Über den Briefwechsel zwischen Michelangelo Fardella und Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana 15:153–183Google Scholar

Femiano, S. 1986. Fardella: Pensieri scientifici e Lettera antiscolastica. Naples

Fichant, M. 1996. “Leibniz, cet inconnu.” La Vie des Sciences 13:343–353Google Scholar

Fichant, M. 1998. Science et métaphysique dans Descartes et Leibniz. Paris: Presse universitaires de France

Finster, R. 1997. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Der Briefwechsel mit Antoine Arnauld. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag

Foucher, S. 1673. Dissertation sur la recherche de la vérité, ou sur la logique des academiciens. Dijon

Foucher, S. 1675. Critique de la recherche de la vérité. Paris. Trans. in R. A. Watson and M. Greene. 1995

Foucher, S. 1676. Réponse pour la critique à la preface du second volume de la recherche de la verité, où l'on examine le sentiment de M. Descartes touchant les idées, avec plusieurs remarques pour les sciences. Paris: Charles Angot

Foucher, S. 1679. Nouvelle dissertation sur la recherche de la verité, contenant la réponse à la critique de la critique de la recherche de la verité, où l'on découvre les erreurs des dogmatistes, tant anciens que nouveaux, avec une discution particuliere du grand principe des cartesiens. Paris: Robert de la Caille

Foucher, S. 1682. De la sagesse des anciens, où l'on fait voir que les principales maximes de leurs morales ne sont pas contraire au christianisme 1682. Paris: Antoine Dezalier

Foucher, S. 1686. Réponse à la critique de la critique de la recherche de la verité sur la philosophie des academiciens: seconde partie: Où il est parlé de sentiment de S. Augustin touchant les academicians. Paris: Antoine Lambin

Foucher, S. 1693. Dissertations sur la recherche de la vérité, contenant l'histoire et les principes de la philosophie des academiciens. Avec plusiers réflexions sur les sentimens de M. Descartes Paris: J. Anisson. (A compilation of the material presented in Foucher's three treatises on the Academic philosophy.)

Foucher de Careil, A. 1905. Mémoire sur la philosophie de Leibniz. Paris: F. R. de Rudeval

Frémont, C. 1981. L'être et la relation. Paris: J. Vrin

Garber, D. 1985. “Leibniz and the Foundations of Physics: The Middle Years,” in K. Okruhlick and J. R. Brown, eds. 1985:27–130

Garber, D. 1992. Descartes Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Garber, D. 1995. “Leibniz: Physics and Philosophy,” in N. Jolley, ed. 1995:270 –352

Garber, D. 1996. “Body, Monad, and Corporeal Substance: Review Essay of Robert M. Adams, Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist.” Leibniz Society Review 6:89–106Google Scholar

Gassendi, P. 1972. The Selected Works of Pierre Gassendi. Ed. and trans. by C. B. Brush. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation

Gaukroger, S., ed. 1991. The Uses of Antiquity. Dordrecht: Kluwer

Goldenbaum, U. 1999. “Transubstantiation, Physics and Philosophy at the Time of the Catholic Demonstrations,” in S. Brown, ed. 1999:79–102

Greengrass, M., Leslie, M., and Raylor, T., eds. 1994. Samuel Hartlib and Universal Reformation. Studies in Intellectual Communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Gruber, J. D., ed. 1745. Commercii epistolici leibnitiani. 2 Teile [2 vols.] 2nd edition?. Hannover: Schmid

Guhrauer, G. E. 1842. Gottfried Wilhelm Freiherr von Leibnitz: Eine Biographie, 2 vols. Breslau: F. Hirt. Reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1966

Hall, A. R. 1980. Philosophers at War. New York: Cambridge University Press

Hannequin, A. 1908. “La première philosophie de Leibnitz.” Études d'histoire des sciences et d'histoire de la philosophie, 2:17–224. Paris: AlcanGoogle Scholar

Hartz, G. 1992. “Leibniz's Phenomenalisms.” Philosophical Review 101:511–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartz, G. 1998. “Why Corporeal Substances Keep Popping Up in Leibniz's Later Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6:193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartz, G. and Cover, J. A. 1988. “Space and Time in the Leibnizian Metaphysic.” Nous 22:493–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, P. 1995. “Newtonian Science, Miracles, and the Laws of Nature.” Journal of the History of Ideas 56:531–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatton, R. M. 1978. George I: Elector and King. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Heidanus, A. 1676. Consideratiën over eenige Saecken onlanghs voorgevallen in de Universiteyt binnen Leyden. Leiden

Henninger, M. 1989. Relations: Medieval Theories, 1250–1325. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Hevelius, J. 1670. “An Extract of a Letter, written by Monsieur Hevelius to the Publisher, from Dantzick, July 5, 1670. Containing chiefly an late Observation on the Variation of the Magnetick Needle […].” Philosophical Transactions 64:2059–2061CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, C. 1965. Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Hochstetter, E. 1966. “Leibniz-Interpretation.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 20:174–192Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. E. 1974. Leibniz in Paris 1672–1676. His Growth to Mathematical Maturity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Hutton, S. 1993. “Damaris Cudworth, Lady Masham: Between Platonism and Enlightenment.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1:29–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huygens, C. 1669a. “Extrait d'une lettre de M. Hugens à l'Auteur du Journal.” Journal des Sçavans, March 18, 1669: 22–24Google Scholar

Huygens, C. 1669b. “A Summary Account of the Laws of Motion, communicated by Mr. Christian Hugens in a Letter to the R. Society, and since printed in French in the Journal des Scavans of March 18, 1669. St. n.” Philosophical Transactions 46:925–928Google Scholar

Iltis, C. 1971. “Leibniz and the Vis Viva Controversy.” Isis 62:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ishiguro, H. 1990. Leibniz's Philosophy of Logic and Language, 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Israel, J. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. New York: Oxford University Press

Jacob, A. 1991. “The Neoplatonic Conception of Nature in More, Cudworth, and Berkeley,” in S. Gaukroger, ed. 1991:101–121

Jesseph, D. M. 1999. Squaring the Circle: The War between Hobbes and Wallis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Jolley, N. 1984. Leibniz and Locke: A study of the New Essays on Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Jolley, N., ed. 1995. The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. New York: Cambridge University Press

Kabitz, W. 1909. Die Philosophie des jungen Leibniz. Heidelberg: C. Winter

Klever, W. N. A. 1988. “Burchard de Volder (1643–1709), a Crypto-Spinozist on a Leiden Cathedra.” Lias: Sources and Documents Relating to the Early Modern History of Ideas 15:191–241Google Scholar

Kortholt, C. 1734–1742. Viri Illustriss. Godefridi Guil. Leibnitii EPISTOLAE AD DIVERSOS, 4 vols. Leipzig: Breitkopf

Kraye, J., ed. 1996. Cambridge Companion to Humanism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Kraye, J. and Stone, M., eds. 1999. London Studies in the History of Philosophy, Volume 1. London: Routledge

Krempel, A. 1952. La doctrine de la relation chez Saint Thomas: Exposé historique et systématique. Paris: J. Vrin

Kulstad, M. 1980. “A Closer Look at Leibniz's Alleged Reduction of Relations.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 18:417–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kulstad, M. 1991. Leibniz on Apperception, Consciousness, and Reflection. München: Philosophia

Lach, D. 1957. The Preface to Leibniz' Novissima Sinica. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press

Lauria, D. 1974. Agostinismo e cartesianesimo in Michelangelo Fardella. Catenia

Leclerc, I. ed., 1973. The Philosophy of Leibniz and the Modern World. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press

Le Clerc, J. 1709. “Eloge de feu Mr. De Volder Professeur en Philosophie et aux Mathematiques, dans l'Academie de Leide,” in J. Le Clerc ed. 1703–1713:t XVIII, 346 –401

Le Clerc, J., ed. 1703–1713. Bibliotheque choisie, pour servir de suite a la Bibliotheque universelle. Amsterdam: Chez Henri Schelte

Leinsle, U. G. 1988. Reformversuche protestantischer Metaphysik im Zeitalter des Rationalismus, Augsburg: Marlo

Levey, S. 1998. “Leibniz on Mathematics and the Actually Infinite Division of Matter.” Philosophical Review 107:49–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, G. 1952. Lettres de Leibniz à Arnauld d'après un manuscrit inédit. Paris: Press universitaires de France

Lodge, P. 1998a. “The Failure of Leibniz's Correspondence with De Volder.” Leibniz Society Review 8:47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lodge, P. 1998b. “Leibniz's Heterogeneity Argument Against the Cartesian Conception of Body.” Studia Leibnitiana 30:83–102Google Scholar

Lodge, P. 2001a. “Leibniz's Notion of an Aggregate.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9:467–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lodge, P. 2001b. “The Debate Over Extended Substance in Leibniz's Correspondence with De Volder.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lodge, P. 2002. “Leibniz on Aggregates, Divisibility and Cartesian Bodies.” Studia Leibnitiana 34:59–80Google Scholar

Lodge, P. (forthcoming). “Burchard de Volder: Crypto-Spinozist or Disenchanted Cartesian?” in T. Schmaltz ed.

Loemker, L. E. 1973. “Leibniz's Conception of Philosophical Method,” in I. Leclerc, ed. 1973:135–157

Look, B. 1999. Leibniz and the ‘Vinculum Substantiale.’ Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag

Look, B. 2002. “On Monadic Domination in Leibniz's Metaphysics.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10:379–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loosen, R. and Vonessen F. 1968. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Zwei Briefe über das binäre Zahlensystem und die chinesische Philosophie. Stuttgart: Belser-Presse

Lunsingh Scheurleer, T. H. and Posthumus Meyjes G. H. M., eds. 1975. Leiden University in the Seventeenth Century: An Exchange of Learning. Leiden: E. J. Brill

Malebranche, N. 1674–1675. De la Recherche de la Vérité où l'on traite de la nature de l'esprit de l'homme, & l'usage qu'il en doit faire pour éviter l'erreur dans les sciences. Paris

Malebranche, N. 1678. Éclaircissements sur La Recherche de la Vérité. Paris

Masham, D. 1696. A Discourse Concerning the Love of God. London: Awnsham & John Churchill

Masham, D. 1705. Occasional Thoughts in Reference to a Vertuous or Christian Life. London: Awnsham & John Churchill

Mathieu, V. 1960. Leibniz e des Bosses. Turin: Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia

McGuire, J. 1985. “Phenomenalism, Relations, and Monadic Representations: Leibniz on Predicate Levels,” in J. Bogen and J. McGuire, eds. 1985:205–233

Mercer, C. 1993. “The Vitality and Importance of Early Modern Aristotelianism,” in T. Sorell, ed. 1993:33 –67

Mercer, C. 1999. “Humanist Platonism in Seventeenth-Century Germany,” in J. Kraye and M. Stone, eds. 1999:147–159

Mercer, C. 2001. Leibniz's Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press

Merkel, F. R. 1920. G. W. Leibniz und die China-Mission. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs'sche Buchhandlung

Moll, K. 1978–1996. Der junge Leibniz, 3 vols. Stuttgart: Fromann-Holzboog

Mugnai, M. 1992. Leibniz' Theory of Relations. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag

Müller, U., ed. 1987. Salve Academicum. Festschrift der Stadt Schweinfurt anläßlich des 300. Jahretages der Priviligierung der Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina durch Kaiser Leopold I. vom 7. August 1687. Schweinfurt: Stadtarchiv

Müller, K. and Krönert, G. 1969. Leben und Werk von G. W. Leibniz. Frankfurt: Klostermann

Nason, J. W. 1946. “Leibniz's Attack on the Cartesian Conception of Extension.” Journal of the History of Ideas 7:447–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nesselrath, H. G. and Reinbothe H. 1979. Das Nueste über China. Koln: Deutsche China-Gesellschaft

Nizolio, M. 1553. De Veris Principiis et Vera Ratione Philosophandi contra Pseudophilosophos. Parma. (G. W. Leibniz, ed., Frankfurt 1670)

Nowak, K. and Poser, H., eds. 1999. Wissenschaft und Weltgestaltung. Hildesheim: Georg Olms

Oldenburg, H. 1671. “[Advertisement of] Hypothesis physica nova, sive Theoria motus concreti, una cum Theoria motus abstracti. Auth. Gothofredo Guilielmo Leibitio […].” Philosophical Transactions 73:2213–2214Google Scholar

Okruhlick, K. and Brown, J. R., eds. 1985. The Natural Philosophy of Leibniz. Dordrecht: Reidel

de Pater, C. 1975. “Experimental Physics,” in T. H. Lunsingh Scheurleer and G. H. M. Posthumus Meyjes, ed. 1975:309–328

Perkins, F. 2002. “Virtue, Reason, and Cultural Exchange: Leibniz's Praise for the Natural Morality of the Chinese.” Journal of the History of Ideas 63:447–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfizenmaier, T. C. 1997. “Was Isaac Newton an Arian?” Journal of the History of Ideas 58:57–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phemister, P. 2003. “Exploring Leibniz's Kingdoms: A Philosophical Analysis of Nature and Grace.” Ecotheology 7:126–145Google Scholar

Pombo, O. 1987. Leibniz and the Problem of a Universal Language. Münster: Nodus

Popkin, R. H. 1966. “Leibniz and the French Sceptics.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 76–77:228–248Google Scholar

Popkin, R. H. 1991. Pierre Bayle. Historical and Critical Dictionary: Selections. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett

Poser, H. 1999. “Theoria cum praxi: Das Leibnizsche Akademiekonzept und die Technikwissenschaften,” in K. Nowak and H. Poser, eds. 1999:93–115

Přívratská, J. and Přívratský, V. 1994. “Language as the Product and Mediator of Knowledge: The Concept of J. A. Comenius,” in M. Greengrass et al., eds. 1994:162–173

Probst, S. 1997. Die mathematische Kontroverse zwischen Thomas Hobbes und John Wallis. Dissertation Univ. Regensburg 1994. Hannover:

Ravier, E. 1937. Bibliographie des Oeuvres de Leibniz. Paris: F. Alcan

Robinet, A. 1986. Architectonique disjonctive, automates systemiques, et idealiste transcendentale. Paris: J. Vrin

Robinet, A. 1988. G. W. Leibniz: Iter Italicum (Mars 1689–Mars 1690). Firenze: L. S. Olschki

Robinet, A. 1991. L'empire leibnizien: La conquête de la chaire de mathématiques de l'Université de Padoue: Jakob Hermann et Nicolas Bernoulli, 1707–1719. Trieste:

Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. 1999. “Leibniz's Argument for the Identity of Indiscernibles in His Correspondence with Clarke.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruestow, E. G. 1973. Physics at 17th. and 18th. Century Leiden. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff

Russell, B. 1937. A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz, 2nd edition. London: Allen & Unwin

Russell, L. J. 1927. “The Correspondence between Leibniz and De Volder.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 28:155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutherford, D. 1990. “Leibniz's Analysis of Multitude and Phenomena into Unities and Reality.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 28:525–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutherford, D. 1994. “Leibniz and the Problem of Monadic Aggregation.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 76:65–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutherford, D. 1995. Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature. New York: Cambridge University Press

Rutherford, D. 1996. “Demonstration and Reconciliation: The Eclipse of the Geometrical Method in Leibniz's Philosophy,” in R. S. Woolhouse, ed. 1996:181–201

Sault, R. 1693. Conference betwixt a modern Atheist and his Friend. London

Schmaltz, T., ed. forthcoming. Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and Anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe. London: Routledge

Schneewind, J. B., ed. 1990. Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant: An Anthology, 1. New York: Cambridge University Press

Schneider, M. 1994. “Leibniz' Konzeption der Characteristica Universalis zwischen 1677 und 1690.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 48:213–236Google Scholar

Schönfeld, M. 2000. The Philosophy of the Young Kant. New York: Oxford University Press

Schönfeld, M. 2002. “Christian Wolff and Leibnizian Monads.” The Leibniz Review 12:131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scriba, C. J. 1987. “Auf der Suche nach neuen Wegen. Die Selbstdarstellung der Leopoldina und der Royal Society in London in ihrer Korrespondenz der ersten Jahre (1664–1669),” in U. Müller, ed. 1987:69–82

Sleigh, R. C., Jr. 1990. Leibniz and Arnauld. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Sorell, T., ed. 1993. The Rise of Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Stimson, D. 1939. “Hartlib, Haak and Oldenburg: Intelligencers” Isis 31:309–326Google Scholar

Sturm, J. C. 1686. Philosophia Eclectica. Altdorf

Thiel, U. 1991. “Cudworth and Seventeenth-Century Theories of Consciousness,” in S. Gaukroger, ed. 1991:79–99

Thomasius, J. 1658. Breviarium Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum. Leipzig

Thomasius, J. 1665. Schediasma Historicum. Leipzig

Thomasius, J. 1670. Physica, Perpetuo Dialogo. Leipzig: G. H. Frommann

Thomasius, J. 1676. Exercitatio de Stoica mundi exustione: cui accesserunt argumenti varii, sed inprimis ad historiam Stoicae philosopohiae facientes, dissertationes XXI. Leipzig: F. Lanckisius

Thomasius, J. 1693. Dissertationes ⅬXIII & Varii Argumenti Magnam Partem ad Historiam Philosophicam & Ecclesiasticam Pertinentes. Ed. and preface by C. Thomasius. Halle

Thomasius, J. 1699. Origines Historiae Philosophicae & Ecclesiasticae. Preface by C. Thomasius. Halle: J. G. Renger

Vailati, E. 1997. Leibniz and Clarke: A Study of their Correspondence. New York: Oxford University Press

Verbeek, T. 1992. Descartes and the Dutch: Early Reactions to Cartesian Philosophy, 1637–1650. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press

Veesenmeyer, G. 1788. G. G. Leibnitii Epistolae Ad D. Joanem Andream Schmidium, Theologum Helmstadiensem. Norimberg: G. P. Monath

Vesey, G., ed. 1990. The Philosophy in Christianity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

de Volder, B. 1685. Disputationes philosophicae omnes contra atheos. Middleburg: Lateranus

de Volder, B. 1695. Exercitationes academicae quibus Renati Cartesii philosophia efenditur adversus Petri Danielis Huetii censuram philosophiae Cartesianae. Amsterdam: Van Ravenstein. Cited by volume and page

de Volder, B. 1698. Oratio de rationis viribus, et usu in scientiis. Leiden: Boutesstein

Wallis, J. 1669. “A Summary Account given by Dr. John Wallis, of the General Laws of Motion, by way of Letter written by him to the Publisher, and communicated to the R. Society, Novemb. 26, 1668.” Philosophical Transactions 43:864–866Google Scholar

Wallis, J. 1671. “Dr. Wallis's opinion concerning the Hypothesis Physica Nova of Dr. Leibnitius, promised in Numb. 73. and here inserted in the same tongue, wherein it was written to the Publisher, April. 7. 1671.” Philosophical Transactions 74:2227–2231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watkins, E. 1998. “From Pre-established Harmony to Physical Influx: Leibniz's Reception in Eighteenth Century Germany.” Perspectives on Science 6:136–203Google Scholar

Watkins, E. forthcoming. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press

Watson, R. A. 1987. The Breakdown of Cartesian Metaphysics. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press

Watson, R. A. and Greene M. 1995. Malebranche's First and Last Critics. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press

Webster, C. 1975. The Great Instauration. Science, Medicine and Reform 1626–1660. London: Duckworth

Weigel, E. 1658. Analysis Aristotelica ex Euclide Restituta. Jena: Grosium

Weinberg, J. 1965. Abstraction, Relation, and Induction: Three Essays in the History of Thought. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press

Westfall, R. S. 1980. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. New York: Cambridge University Press

Widmaier, R. 1983. Die Rolle der Chinesischen Schrift in Leibniz's Zeichentheorie. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag

Wilson, C. 1989. Leibniz's Metaphysics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Wilson, C. 1995. “The Reception of Leibniz in the Eighteenth Century,” in N. Jolley, ed. 1995:442–474

Wolff, C. 1963. Preliminary Discourse on Philosophy in General. Trans. Richard J. Blackwell. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill

Woolhouse, R. S. 1993. Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz. London: Routledge

Woolhouse, R. S., ed. 1996. Leibniz's ‘New System.’ Florence: Leo S. Olschki

Wren, C. 1669. “Dr. Christopher Wrens Theory concerning the same Subject [sc. General Laws of Motion]; imparted to the R. Society Decemb. 17, last, though entertain'd by the Author divers years ago, and verified by many Experiments, made by Himself and that other excellent Mathematician M. Rook before the said Society, as is attested by many Worthy Members of that Illustrious Body.” Philosophical Transactions 43:867–868Google Scholar

Zacher, H. 1973. Die Hauptschriften zur Dyadik von G. W. Leibniz. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann