Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:26:01.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - International law and global justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Lukas H. Meyer
Affiliation:
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria
Get access

Summary

Introduction

It is generally known that people in numerous regions of the world, which usually are called ‘Third World’ or ‘developing countries’, particularly Africa, South America, Asia and South East Europe, suffer from extreme poverty. Although a group of developing countries have achieved enormous growth by which they could overcome their backwardness, social and economic inequalities in the world have increased significantly in the course of the last century. It seems obvious that the causes for the misery of poor countries lie in their legal and political structures themselves, at least to a considerable extent. In almost all of them, wealth is distributed extremely unequally, public education is miserable, economic productivity is very low, women are kept under suppression, and birth rates are high. In many countries, large parts of the population suffer from exploitation, because they are denied equal protection of their rights by a corrupt state bureaucracy and judiciary. And many of those countries are under the control of oppressive regimes that rule with brute force, persecute any opposition and misuse their power to their own benefit. When a number of these factors come together, they easily lead to a ‘vicious circle of poverty’, a self-enforcing process of social impoverishment that a nation hardly can overcome by itself.

It appears plausible to assume that the prevailing features of global poverty and misery are closely connected with the existing legal structures in general and the legal positions of the disadvantaged people in particular. And various empirical studies confirm that.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkan, E. 2001. The Guilt of Nations. Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, B. 1989. ‘Humanity and Justice in Global Perspective’, in Barry, B., Democracy, Power and Justice. Essays in Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 434–62.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. 2002. Free Trade Today. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination. Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chwaszcza, C. and Kersting, W. (eds.) 1998. Politische Philosophie der internationalen Beziehungen. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Coleman, J. 1992. Risks and Wrongs. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Czempiel, E.-O. 2002. Weltpolitik im Umbruch. Die Pax Americana, der Terrorismus und die Zukunft der internationalen Beziehungen. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. 1993. An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. 1973. Social Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Franck, T. M. 1995. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gijsel, P. 1984. ‘Individuum und Gerechtigkeit in ökonomischen Verteilungstheorien’, in Ökonomie und Gesellschaft. Jahrbuch 2: Wohlfahrt und Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt: Campus, 14–66.Google Scholar
Gosepath, S. and Merle, J.-C. (eds.) 2002. Weltrepublik. Globalisierung und Demokratie. Munich: C. H. Beck.
Hayek, F. A. 1976. Law, Legislation and Liberty, vol. 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Held, D. and Koenig-Archibugi, M. (eds.) 2003. Taming Globalization. Frontiers of Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Held, D. and McGrew, A. (eds.) 2002. Governing Globalization. Power, Authority and Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hertz, N. 2004. I.O.U. The Debt Threat and Why We Must Defuse It. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Hinsch, W. 2003. ‘Die Verschuldung ärmster Entwicklungsländer aus ethischer Sicht’, in Dabrowski, M., Fisch, A., Gabriel, K. and Lienkamp, C. (eds.), Die Diskussion um ein Insolvenzrecht für Staaten. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 17–43.Google Scholar
Höffe, O. 1987. Politische Gerechtigkeit. Grundlegung einer kritischen Philosophie von Recht und Staat. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Höffe, O. 1999. Demokratie im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. 1997. The World Trading System. Law and Policy of International Economic Relations. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kapstein, E. B. 2006. Economic Justice in an Unfair World. Toward a Level Playing Field. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. and Stern, M. A. (eds.) 1999. Global Public Goods. International Cooperation in the 21st Century. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kohler, G. and Marti, U. (eds.) 2003. Konturen der neuen Welt(un)ordnung. Beiträge zu einer Theorie der normativen Prinzipien internationaler Politik. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Koller, P. 2001. ‘Zur Semantik der Gerechtigkeit’, in Koller, P. (ed.), Gerechtigkeit im politischen Diskurs der Gegenwart. Vienna: Passagen, 19–46.Google Scholar
Koller, P. 2003. ‘Soziale Gerechtigkeit – Begriff und Begründung’, ErwägenWissenEthik 14, 237–50, 307–21.Google Scholar
Koller, P. (ed.) 2006. Die globale Frage. Empirische Befunde und ethische Herausforderungen. Vienna: Passagen.
Krugman, P. 1996. Pop Internationalism. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Luper-Foy, S. (ed.) 1988. Problems of International Justice. Boulder and London: Westview Press.
Lutz-Bachmann, M. and Bohman, J. (eds.) 2002. Weltstaat oder Staatenwelt? Für und wider die Idee einer Weltrepublik. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Marti, U. 2003. ‘Globale distributive Gerechtigkeit’, in Kohler, G. and Marti, U. (eds.), Konturen der neuen Welt(un)ordnung. Beiträge zu einer Theorie der normativen Prinzipien internationaler Politik. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 345–61.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. H. 2005. Historische Gerechtigkeit. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. 1976. Social Justice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moellendorf, D. 2002. Cosmopolitan Justice. Boulder and Oxford: Westview.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. 2000. ‘Global Public Goods’, in Krull, W. (ed.), Debates on Issues of Our Common Future. Weilerswist: Velbrück, 143–54.Google Scholar
O'Neill, O. 2000. Bounds of Justice. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Oxfam International 2002. Rigged Rules and Double Standards. Trade, Globalisation, and the Fight against Poverty. Oxford: Oxfam.Google Scholar
,Oxfam International 2005. Beyond HIPC. Debt cancellation and the Millennium Development Goals. Oxford: Oxfam, Briefing Paper78.Google Scholar
,Oxfam International 2006. Kicking the Habit: How the Word Bank and the IMF are Still Addicted to Attaching Economic Policy Conditions to Aid. Oxford: Oxfam, Briefing Paper96.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (ed.) 2001. Global Justice. Oxford: Blackwell.
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A. and Limongi, F. 2000. Democracy and Development. Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World 1950–1990. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sautter, H. 2004. Weltwirtschaftsordnung. Die Institutionen der globalen Ökonomie. Munich: Franz Vahlen.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1981. Poverty and Famines. An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 2002. One World. The Ethics of Globalization. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sterba, J. P. 1980. The Demands of Justice. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. Globalization and its Discontents. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. and Charlton, A. 2005. Fair Trade for All. How Trade Can Promote Development. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M. J. and Howse, R. 2005. The Regulation of International Trade. 3rd edn. London and New York: Routledge.
Walras, L. 1990 [1896]. Etudes d'économie sociale: théorie de la répartition de la richesse sociale. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Woods, N. 1999. ‘Order, Globalization, and Inequality in World Politics’, in Hurrell, A. and Woods, N. (eds.), Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics. Oxford University Press, 8–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,World Bank 2002. Globalization, Growth, and Poverty. Building an Inclusive World Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wuppertal Institut für, Klima, Umwelt, Energie (ed.) 2005. Fair Future. Begrenzte Ressourcen und globale Gerechtigkeit. Munich: C. H. Beck.
Zampetti, A. B. 2006. Fairness in the World Economy. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, M. 1998. Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaats. Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×