Aboderin, Isabella, 2004. “Modernisation and Ageing Theory Revisited: Current Explanations of Recent Developing World and Historical Western Shifts in Material Family Support for Older People,” Ageing & Society, 24(1): 29–50.Google Scholar

Abrams, Kerry, 2013. “What Makes the Family Special?” The University of Chicago Law Review, 80(1): 7–27. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Abrams, Kerry and Kent, Piacenti R., 2014. “Immigration’s Family Values,” Virginia Law Review, 100(4): 629–709.Google Scholar

Abrego, Leisy J., 2014. Sacrificing Families: Navigating Laws, Labor, and Love across Borders (Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar

Adar Bunis, Mattat, 2007. Families in Sociological and Anthropological Perspective (Raanana: The Open University of Israel). [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Adelman, Carol C., 2003. “The Privatization of Foreign Aid: Reassessing National Largesse,” Foreign Affairs, 82(6): 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmad, Nehaluddin, 2011. “Child Labour: Ground Realities of Indian Labor Laws,” Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 37(1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akhtar, Rajnaara, 2010. “British Muslims and the Revolution of the Practice of Islamic Law with Particular Reference to Dispute Resolution,” Journal of Islamic State Practices in International Law, 6(1): 27–39.Google Scholar

Alanen, Julia, 2008. “When Human Rights Conflict: Mediating International Parental Kidnapping Disputes Involving the Domestic Violence Defense,” Inter-American Law Review, 40(1): 49–108.Google Scholar

Albin, Einat, 2016. “From Required and Unlimited Intimacy to Troubling Unfree Labor: The Case of Domestic Workers,” Tel-Aviv University Law Review, 39(2): 369–414. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Aldeeb Abu-Sahlieh, Sami A., 2006. “Male and Female Circumcision: The Myth of the Difference” in Rogaia, Mustafa Abusharaf (Ed.), Female Circumcision: Multicultural Perspectives (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press), pp. 47–74.Google Scholar

Aldeeb, Abu-Sahlieh Sami A., 1994. “To Mutilate in the Name of Jehovah or Allah: Legitimization of Male and Female Circumcision,” Medicine and Law, 13(7–8): 575–622.Google Scholar

Ali, Shaheen Sardar, 2013. “Authority and Authenticity: Sharia Councils, Muslim Women’s Rights, and the English Courts,” Child and Family Law Quarterly, 25: 113–37.Google Scholar

Almog, Shulamit, 2000. Law and Literature (Jerusalem: Nevo). [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Altink, Henrice and Chris, Weedon, 2010. “Introduction” in Aaron, Jane, Altink, Henrice and Weedon, Chris (Eds.), Gendering Border Studies (Cardiff: University of Wales Press), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Amato, Paul R., 1998. “More Than Money? Men’s Contributions to Their Children’s Lives” in Booth, Alan and Crouter, Ann C. (Eds.), Men in Families: When Do They Get Involved? What Difference Does It Make? (New York: Psychology Press), pp. 241–78.Google Scholar

André, Géraldine and Marie, Godin, 2014. “Child Labour, Agency and Family Dynamics,” Childhood, 21(2): 161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andreß, Hans-Jürgen, Barbara, Borgloh, Miriam, Bröckel, Marco, Giesselmann and Dina, Hummelsheim, 2006. “The Economic Consequences of Partnership Dissolution: A Comparative Analysis of Panel Studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy and Sweden,” European Sociological Review, 22(5): 533–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andro, Armelle, Emmanuelle, Cambois, and Marie, Lesclingand, 2014. “Long-Term Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation in a European Context: Self Perceived Health of FGM Women Compared to Non FGM Women,” Social Science & Medicine, 106: 177–84.Google Scholar

Anu, Kumar Pawan, Deep, Inder, and Nandini, Sharma, 2013. “Surrogacy and Women’s Right to Health in India: Issues and Perspective,” Indian Journal of Public Health, 57(2): 65–70.Google Scholar

Appadurai, Arjun (Ed.), 2003. Globalization (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).Google Scholar

Appadurai, Arjun, 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar

Arbel, Efrat, 2013. “The Culture of Rights Protection in Canadian Refugee Law: Examining the Domestic Violence Cases,” McGill Law Journal, 58(3): 729–71.Google Scholar

Ashe, Marie and Anissa, Hélie, 2013. “Realities of Religio-Legalism: Religious Courts and Women’s Rights in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States,” UC Davis Journal of International Law and Policy, 20(2): 139–209.Google Scholar

Aviram, Hadar, 2010. “Does the Law Achieve Its Goals? Answers from the Empirical Research World” in Hacker, Daphna and Ziv, Neta (Eds.), Does the Law Matter? (Tel Aviv University), pp. 27–62. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Ayalon, Liat, 2011. “Examining Satisfaction with Live-in Foreign Home Care in Israel from the Perspectives of Care Recipients, Their Family Members, and Their Foreign Care Workers,” Aging & Mental Health, 15(3): 376–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayalon, Liat, 2009. “Evaluating the Working Conditions and Exposure to Abuse of Filipino Home Care Workers in Israel: Characteristics and Clinical Correlates,” International Psychogeriatrics, 21(1): 40–9.Google Scholar

Ayalon, Liat, 2009. “Family and Family-Like Interactions in Households with Round-the-Clock Paid Foreign Carers in Israel,” Ageing & Society, 29(5): 671–86.Google Scholar

Baal, Shem Yaacov and Shinar, Duv, 1998. “The Telepresence Era: Global Village or ‘Media Slums,’” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 17(1): 28–35.Google Scholar

Bacik, Ivana, 2013. “The Irish Constitution and Gender Politics: Development in the Law on Abortion,” Irish Political Studies, 28(3): 380–98.Google Scholar

Bailey, Alison, 2011. “Reconceiving Surrogacy: Toward a Reproductive Justice Account of Indian Surrogacy,” Hypatia, 26(4): 715–41.Google Scholar

Baines, Beverley, 2006. “Equality’s Nemesis?” Journal of Law and Equality, 5(1): 57–80.Google Scholar

Baker, Hannah, 2013. “A Possible Future Instrument on International Surrogacy Arrangements: Are There ‘Lessons’ to be Learned from the 1993 Hague Intercountry Adoption Convention?” in Trimmings, Katarina and Beaumont, Paul (Eds.), International Surrogacy Arrangements (Oxford, UK: Hart), pp. 411–26.Google Scholar

Bakht, Natasha, 2004. “Family Arbitration Using Sharia Law: Examining Ontario’s Arbitration Act and its Impact on Women,” Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, 1(1): 1–24.Google Scholar

Balagopalan, Sarada, 2008. “Memories of Tomorrow: Children, Labor, and the Panacea of Formal Schooling,” Journal of the History of Childhood and Youth, 1(2): 267–85.Google Scholar

Balibar, Étienne, 2004. We, the People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Ballard, Robert L., 2015. “Introduction” in Ballard, Robert L., Goodno, Naomi H., Cochran, Robert F., and Milbrandt, A. (Eds.), The Intercountry Adoption Debate (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), pp. 1–4.Google Scholar

Bano, Samia, 2007. “Islamic Family Arbitration, Justice and Human Rights in Britain,” Law, Social Justice & Global Development Journal, 1: 1–26, available at www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/2007_1/bano/.Google Scholar

Barber, Benjamin, 1995. Jihad versus McWorld (New York: Times Books).Google Scholar

Barnett, Ola W., Miller-Perrin, Cindy L., and Perrin, Robin D., 2011. Family Violence across the Lifespan: An Introduction, 3rd ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).Google Scholar

Barrientos, Armando, Gorman, Mark, and Heslop, Amanda, 2003. “Old Age Poverty in Developing Countries: Contributions and Dependence in Later Life,” World Development- Chronic Poverty and Development Policy, 31(3): 555–70.Google Scholar

Bartholet, Elizabeth, 2015. “The Hague Convention: Pros, Cons and Potential” in Ballard, Robert L., Goodno, Naomi H., Cochran, Robert F., and Milbrandt, Jay A. (Eds.), The Intercountry Adoption Debate: Dialogues across Disciplines (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), pp. 239–44.Google Scholar

Bartholet, Elizabeth, 2015. “The International Adoption Cliff: Do Child Human Rights Matter?” in Ballard, Robert L., Goodno, Naomi H., Cochran, Robert F., and Milbrandt, Jay A. (Eds.), The Intercountry Adoption Debate: Dialogues across Disciplines (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), pp. 193–202.Google Scholar

Bartholet, Elizabeth, 2010/2011. “International Adoption: A Way Forward,” New York Law School Law Review, 55: 687–99.Google Scholar

Bartholet, Elizabeth, 2007. “International Adoption: The Child’s Story,” Georgia State University Law Review, 24(2): 333–379.Google Scholar

Bartholet, Elizabeth, 2006. “International Adoption” in Askeland, Lori (Ed.), Children and Youth in Adoption, Orphanages, and Foster Care (London: Greenwood Press), pp. 63–78.Google Scholar

Basu, Kaushik,1999. “Child Labor: Cause, Consequence, and Cure, with Remarks on International Labor Standards,” Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3): 1083–119.Google Scholar

Bauman, Zygmunt, 1998. Globalization: The Human Consequences (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Google Scholar

Bauserman, Robert, 2002. “Child Adjustment in Joint-Custody Versus Sole-Custody Arrangements: A Meta-Analytic Review,” Journal of Family Psychology, 16(1): 91–102.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich, 2006. “Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda,” The British Journal of Sociology, 57(1): 1–23.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich, 1992 . Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (London: Sage).Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich and Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth, 2014. Distant Love (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Google Scholar

Beck Ulrich and Beck-Gernsheim Elisabeth, 2007. “Families in a Runaway World” in Scott, Jacqueline, Treas, Judith and Richards, Martin (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 499–514.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich and Elisabeth, Beck-Gernsheim, 1995. The Normal Chaos of Love (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Google Scholar

Bélanger, Danièle and Tran, Giang Linh, 2011. “The Impact of Transnational Migration on Gender and Marriage in Sending Communities of Vietnam,” Current Sociology, 59(1): 59–77.Google Scholar

Ben-Naftali, Orna and Yuval, Shany, 2006. International Law between War and Peace (Tel Aviv: Ramot). [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Benedict, Anderson, 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, rev. edn. (London: Verso).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, 2013. “Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders,” American Journal of International Law, 107(2): 295–333.Google Scholar

Berg, Rigmor C. and Denison, Eva, 2012. “Interventions to Reduce the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/ Cutting in African Countries,” Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(9): 1–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkovitch, Nitza, 1999. From Motherhood to Citizenship: Women’s Rights and International Organizations (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff, 2005. The Globalization of International Law (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar

Bernstein, Gaia and Triger, Zvi, 2011. “Over-Parenting,” UC Davis Law Review, 44(4): 1221–79.Google Scholar

Bessell, Sharon, 2011. “Influencing International Child Labour Policy: The Potential and Limits of Children-Centred Research,” Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4): 564–68.Google Scholar

Bettio, Francesca, Simonazzi, Annamaria, and Villa, Paola, 2006. “Change in Care Regimes and Female Migration: The ‘Care Drain’ in the Mediterranean,” Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3): 271–85.Google Scholar

Bhabha, Jacqueline, 2003. “The Citizenship Deficit: On Being a Citizen Child,” Development, 46(3): 53–9.Google Scholar

Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna, 2016. “Thirty-five Years of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Israel,” Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 2: 16–23, available at www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661816300090.Google Scholar

Blair, Marrianne D., Weiner, Merle H., Stark, Barbara, and Maldonado, Solangel (Eds.), 2009. Family Law in the World Community: Cases, Materials, and Problems in Comparative and International Family Law, 2nd edn. (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press).Google Scholar

Blecher-Prigat, Ayelet, 2012. “The Costs of Raising Children: Towards a Theory of Financial Obligations between Co-Parents,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 13(1): 154–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blecher-Prigat, Ayelet, 2010. “The Family and the Law?” in Hacker, Daphna and Ziv, Neta (Eds.), Does the Law Matter? (Tel Aviv University), pp. 275–304. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Bloomer, Fiona and O’Dowd, Kellie, 2014, “Restricted Access to Abortion in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: Exploring Abortion Tourism and Barriers to Legal Reform,” Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(4): 366–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blyth, Eric, 2010. “Fertility Patients’ Experiences of Cross-Border Reproductive Care,” Fertility & Sterility, 94(1): e11–e15, available at www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(10)00106-8/fulltext.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boccagni, Paolo, 2013. “Migration and the Family Transformations It ‘Leaves Behind’: A Critical View from Ecuador,” The Latin Americanist, 57(4): 3–24.Google Scholar

Boellstorff, Tom, 2008 . Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Bonjour, Saskia and de Hart, Betty, 2013. “A Proper Wife, a Proper Marriage: Constructions of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Dutch Family Migration Policy,” European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20(1): 61–76.Google Scholar

Bookey, Blaine, 2016. “Gender- Based Asylum Post- Matter of A-R-C-G: Evolving Standards and Fair Application of the Law,” Southwestern Journal of International Law, 22: 1–19.Google Scholar

Bosniak, Linda, 2006. The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, 1996. “On the Family as a Realized Category,” Theory, Culture & Society, 13(3): 19–26.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, 1987. “The Force of Law: Towards a Sociology of the Juridical Field,” Hastings Law Journal, 38: 814–53.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Richard, Nice (Trans.) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Bourdillon, Michael, 2006. “Children and Work: A Review of Current Literature and Debates,” Development & Change, 37(6): 1201–27.Google Scholar

Boyd, Susan S., 2010. “Autonomy for Mothers? Relational Theory and Parenting Apart,” Feminist Legal Studies, 18(2): 137–58.Google Scholar

Brandt, Martina, Haberkern, Klaus, and Szydlik, Marc, 2009. “Intergenerational Help and Care in Europe,” European Sociological Review, 25(5): 585–601.Google Scholar

Breuning, Marijka, 2013. “Samaritans, Family Builders, and the Politics of Intercountry Adoption,” International Studies Perspectives, 14(4): 417–35.Google Scholar

Brining, Margaret F., Schneider, Carl E., and Teitelbaum, Lee E. (Eds.), 1999. Family Law in Action: A Reader (Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing).Google Scholar

Brod, Frommer Gail, 1994. “Premarital Agreement and Gender Justice,” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 6: 229–95.Google Scholar

Browne, Collette V. and Braun, Kathryn L., 2008. “Globalization, Women’s Migration, and the Long-Term-Care Workforce,” The Gerontologist, 48(1): 16–24.Google Scholar

Browne, Noah L., 2011. “Relevance and Fairness: Protecting the Rights of Domestic Violence Victims and Left-Behind Fathers under the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction,” Duke Law Journal, 60:1193–238.Google Scholar

Broyde, Michael J., 2011. “New York’s Regulation of Jewish Marriage: Covenant, Contract, or Statute?” in Nichols, Joel A. (Ed.), Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 138–63.Google Scholar

Bruch, Carol S., 2014. “The Unmet Needs of Domestic Violence Victims and Their Children in Hague Child Abduction Convention Cases,” Family Law Quarterly, 38(3): 529–45.Google Scholar

Bryceson, Deborah and Ulla, Vuorela (Eds.), 2002. The Transnational Family: New Frontiers and Global Networks (Oxford, UK: Berg).Google Scholar

Büchler, Andrea, 2011. Islamic Law in Europe?: Legal Pluralism and Its Limits in European Family Laws (Surrey: Ashgate).Google Scholar

Buck, Trevor, 2014. International Child Law, 3rd edn. (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Budlender, Debbie and Lund, Francie, 2011. “South Africa: A Legacy of Family Disruption,” Development and Change, 42(4): 925–46.Google Scholar

Burau, Viola, Theobald, Hildegard, and Blank, Robert H., 2007. Governing Home Care: A Cross-National Comparison (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar

Cameron, David R., Ranis, Gustav, and Zinn, Anaalisa (Eds.), 2006. Globalization and Self-Determination: Is the Nation-State under Siege? (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Cangiano, Alessio, 2014. “Elder Care and Migrant Labor in Europe: A Demographic Outlook, Data and Perspectives,” Population and Development Review, 40(1): 131–54.Google Scholar

Carbone, June, 2014. “Legal Applications of the ‘Best Interest of the Child’ Standard: Judicial Rationalization or a Measure of Institutional Competence?” Pediatrics, 134: S111–20.Google Scholar

Carlson, Richard, 2011. “Seeking the Better Interests of Children with a New International Law of Adoption,” New York Law School Law Review, 55(3): 733–79.Google Scholar

Carsten, Janet, 2004. After Kinship (UK: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Castañeda, Ernesto, 2012. “Living in Limbo: Transnational Households, Remittances and Development,” International Migration, 51(s1), e13–e35, at e27, available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2012.00745.x/full.Google Scholar

Castañeda, Ernesto and Buck, Lesley, 2014. “A Family of Strangers: Transnational Parenting and the Consequences of Family Separation due to Undocumented Migration” in Lorentzen, Lois Ann (Ed.), Hidden Lives and Human Rights in America: Understanding the Controversies and Tragedies of Undocumented Immigration (Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger), pp. 175–202.Google Scholar

Castañeda, Ernesto and Buck, Lesley, 2011. “Remittances, Transnational Parenting, and the Children Left Behind: Economic and Psychological Implications,” The Latin Americanist, 55(4): 85–110.Google Scholar

Castels, Stephen and Miller, Mark J., 1998. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World, 2nd edn. (Hampshire: Macmillan Press).Google Scholar

Chalfin, Brenda, 2012. “Border Security as Late-Capitalist “Fix”” in Wilson, Thomas M. and Donnan, Hastings (Eds.), A Companion to Border Studies (Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell), pp. 283–300.Google Scholar

Champenois, Christina, 2015. “Does the Russian Adoption Ban Violate International Law?” Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review, 11(2): 29–54.Google Scholar

Chantler, Khatidja, Gangoli, Geetanjali, and Hester, Marianne, 2009. “Forced Marriage in the UK: Religious, Cultural, Economic or State Violence?” Critical Social Policy, 29(4): 587–612.Google Scholar

Charsley, Katharine, Storer-Church, Brooke, Benson, Michaela, and Van Hear, Nicholas, 2012. “Marriage-Related Migration to the UK,” International Migration Review, 46(4): 861–90.Google Scholar

Cheney, Kristen, 2014. “‘Giving Children a Better Life?’ Reconsidering Social Reproduction, Humanitarianism and Development in Intercountry Adoption,” European Journal of Development Research, 26(2): 247–63.Google Scholar

Christian, Sandvig, 2013. “The Internet as Infrastructure” in Dutton, William H. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (Oxford University Press), pp. 86–106.Google Scholar

Coe, Cati, 2011. “What is Love? The Materiality of Care in Ghanaian Transnational Families,” International Migration, 49(6): 7–24.Google Scholar

Cohen, Daniel, 2007. Globalization and Its Enemies (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar

Cohen, Jeffrey H., 2005. “Remittance Outcomes and Migration: Theoretical Contests, Real Opportunities,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(1): 88–112.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, and Nussbaum, Martha C., 1999. (Eds.), Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Cole, Jennifer and Durham, Deborah (Eds.), 2007. Generations and Globalization (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar

Collins, Kristin A., 2014. “Illegitimate Borders: Jus Sanguinis, Citizenship and the Legal Construction of Family, Race, and Nation,” Yale Law Journal, 123(7): 2167–206.Google Scholar

Colombo, Asher D., 2007. “‘They Call Me a Housekeeper, but I Do Everything.’ Who Are Domestic Workers Today in Italy and What Do They Do?” Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 12(2): 207–37.Google Scholar

Conroy, Amanda, 2012. “Book Review: Jane Aaron, Henrice Altink and Chris Weedon (Eds.), Gendering Border Studies, Cardiff: University of Wales Press,” European Journal of Women’s Studies, 19: 399–402.Google Scholar

Constable, Nicole, 2013. “Migrant Workers, Legal Tactics, and Fragile Family Formation in Hong Kong,” Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 3(6): 1004–22.Google Scholar

Cooper, Anthony, Perkins, Chris, and Rumford, Chris, 2014. “The Vernacularization of Borders” in Reece, Jones and Corey, Johnson (Eds.), Placing the Border in Everyday Life (Surrey: Ashgate).Google Scholar

Crowther, Ann Luerssen, 2000. “Empty Gestures: The (In)Significance of Recent Attempts to Liberalize Algerian Family Law,” William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 6(3): 611–43.Google Scholar

Cruz, Evelyn Haydee, 2010. “Because You’re Mine, I Walk the Line: The Trials and Tribulations of the Family Visa Program,” Fordham URB Law Journal, 38(1): 155–81.Google Scholar

Curry, Amberlynn, 2010. “The Uniform Premarital Agreement Act and Its Variations throughout the States,” Journal of American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 23: 284–355.Google Scholar

Dancig-Rosenberg, Hadar and Levenkron, Naomi, 2015. “Migratory Violence,” Tel Aviv University Law Review, 37(2): 341–88. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Dauvergne, Catherine, 2009. “Globalization Fragmentation: New Pressures on Women Caught in the Immigration Law-Citizenship Law Dichotomy” in Benhabib, Seyla and Resnik, Judith (Eds.), Migration and Mobilities: Citizenship, Borders and Gender (New York University Press), pp. 333–54.Google Scholar

Dauvergne, Catherine, 2007. “Citizenship with a Vengeance,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 489–507.Google Scholar

Davidov, Guy, Yovel, Jonathan, Saban, Ilan, and Reichman, Amnon, 2005. “State or Family? The 2003 Amendment to the Citizenship and Entrance to Israel Law,” Mishpat Umimshal, 8: 643–99. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

de Blois, Matthijs, 2010. “Religious Law versus Secular Law: The Example of the Get Refusal in Dutch, English and Israeli Law,” Utrecht Law Review, 6(2): 93–114.Google Scholar

de Boer, Ted M., 2008. “The Second Revision of the Brussels II Regulation: Jurisdiction and Applicable Law” in Boele-Woelki, Katharina and Sverdrup, Tone (Eds.), European Challenges in Contemporary Family Law (Antwerp: Intersentia), pp. 321–41.Google Scholar

DeBose, Hawkins Cynthia and DeAngelo, Ekaterina, 2015. “The New Cold War: Russia’s Ban on Adoptions by U.S. Citizens,” Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 28(1): 51–77.Google Scholar

de Hart, Betty, 2009. “Love Thy Neighbour: Family Reunification and the Right of Insiders,” European Journal of Migration and the Law, 11(3): 235–52.Google Scholar

de Hart, Betty, 2006. “Introduction: The Marriage of Convenience in European Immigration Law,” European Journal of Migration and Law, 8(3–4): 251–62.Google Scholar

Dejmanee, Tisha, 2015. “Nursing at the Screen: Post Post-Feminist Daughters and Demonized Mothers on Toddlers and Tiaras,” Feminist Media Studies, 15(3): 460–73.Google Scholar

Delanty, Gerald, 2007. “European Citizenship: A Critical Assessment,” Citizenship Studies, 11(1): 63–72.Google Scholar

Demleitner, Nora V., 2003. “How Much Do Western Democracies Value Family and Marriage?: Immigration Law’s Conflicted Answers,” Hofstra Law Review, 32(1): 273–311.Google Scholar

Deomampo, Daisy, 2013. “Transnational Surrogacy in India: Interrogating Power and Women’s Agency,” Frontier: A Journal of Women’s Studies, 34(3): 167–88.Google Scholar

Dewer, John and Parker, Stephen, 2000. “English Family Law Since World War II: From Status to Chaos” in Katz, Stanford N., Eekelaar, John and Maclean, Mavis (Eds.), Cross Currents: Family Law and Policy in the US and England (Oxford University Press), pp. 123–40.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Yves and Bryant, Garth G. (Eds.), 2002. Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diduck, Alison and Kaganas, Felicity, 2006. Family Law, Gender, and the State: Text, Cases and Materials (Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar

DiFonzo, J. Herbie, 2015. “Dilemmas of Shared Parenting in the 21st Century: How Law and Culture Shape Child Custody,” Hofstra Law Review, 43(4): 1003–24.Google Scholar

Dobrowolsky, Alexandra, 2007. “(In)Security and Citizenship: Security, Im/migration and Shrinking Citizenship Regimes,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 629–61.Google Scholar

Donati, Pierpaolo, 1998. “The New Citizenship of the Family” in Matthijs, Koen (Ed.), The Family: Contemporary Perspectives and Challenges (Leuven University Press), pp. 243–61.Google Scholar

Doron, Israel and Golan, Tal, 2007. “Aging, Globalization and the Legal Construction of “Residence”: The Case of Old Age Pensions in Israel,” The Elder Law Journal, 15(1): 1–50.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Douglas, Sarat, Austin, and Umphery, Martha Merrill, 2006. “Theoretical Perspectives on Lives in the Law: An Introduction” in Sarat, Austin, Lawrence, Douglas and Umphery, Martha Merrill (Eds.), Lives in the Law (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Dragiewicz, Molly, 2011. Equality with a Vengeance: Men’s Rights Groups, Battered Women, and Antifeminist Backlash (Lebanon, NH: Northeastern University Press).Google Scholar

Dreby, Joanna, 2015. “U.S. Immigration Policy and Family Separation: The Consequences for Children’s Well-being,” Social Science & Medicine, 132: 245–51.Google Scholar

duRivage, Nathalie, Keyes, Katherine, Leray, Emmanuelle, Pez, Ondine, Bitfoi, Adina, Koç, Ceren, Goelitz, Dietmar, Kuijpers, Rowella, Lesinskiene, Sigita, Mihova, Zlatka, Otten, Roy, Fermanian, Christophe, and Kovess-Masfety, Viviane, 2015. “Parental Use of Corporal Punishment in Europe: Intersection Between Public Health and Policy,” PloS ONE, 10(2), available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4326463/.Google Scholar

Dustin, Moira, 2010. “Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in the UK,” European Journal of Women’s Studies, 17(1): 7–23.Google Scholar

Dwyer, James G., 2016. “Diagnosing and Dispelling Denialism Regarding Children” in Moerland, Ronald, Nelen, Hans, and Willems, Jan C. M. (Eds.), Denialism and Human Rights (Cambridge: Intersentia), pp. 49–68.Google Scholar

Earp, Brian D., 2016. “Between Moral Relativism and Moral Hypocrisy: Reframing the Debate on FGM,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 26(2): 105–44.Google Scholar

Earp, Brian D., 2015. “Female Genital Mutilation and Male Circumcision: Toward an Autonomy- Based Ethical Framework,” Medicolegal and Bioethics, 5: 89–104.Google Scholar

Ebaugh, Helen Rose and Curry, Mary, 2000. “Fictive Kin as Social Capital in New Immigrant Communities,” Sociological Perspectives, 43(2): 189–209.Google Scholar

Edwards, Benjamin P., 2013. “Welcoming A Post-Doma World: Same-Sex Spousal Petitions and Other Post-Windsor Immigration Implications,” Family Law Quarterly, 47(2): 173–89.Google Scholar

Edwards, Rosalind and Gillies, Val, 2012. “Farewell to Family? Notes on an Argument for Retaining the Concept,” Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(1): 63–9.Google Scholar

Eekelaar, John and George, Rob (Eds.), 2014. Routledge Handbook of Family Law and Policy (Abingdon: Routledge Handbooks).Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Theodor, 2000. “Empirical Methods and the Law,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95: 665–9.Google Scholar

Elizabeth, Vivienne, 2016. “Child Custody” in Shehan, Constance L. (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Family Studies, available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs107/abstract?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=.Google Scholar

Elkins, Jeremy, 2011. “Beyond ‘Beyond the State’: Rethinking Law and Globalization” in Sarat, Austin, Douglas, Lawrence, and Umphrey, Martha Merrill (Eds.), Law without Nations (CA: Stanford University Press), pp. 22–65.Google Scholar

Enchautegui, María E. and Menjívar, Cecilia, 2015. “Paradoxes of Family Immigration Policy: Separation, Reorganization, and Reunification of Families under Current Immigration Laws,” Law & Policy, 37(1–2): 32–60.Google Scholar

Engels, Friedrich, 1985. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar

Erel, Umut, 2012. “Introduction: Transnational Care in Europe – Changing Formations of Citizenship, Family, and Generation,” Social Politics, 19(1): 1–14.Google Scholar

Erez, Edna, Adelman, Madelaine, and Gregory, Carol, 2009. “Intersections of Immigration and Domestic Violence: Voices of Battered Immigrant Women,” Feminist Criminology, 4(1): 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ergas, Yasmine, 2013. “Thinking ‘through’ Human Rights: The Need for a Human Rights Perspective with Respect to the Regulation of Cross-Border Reproduction Surrogacy” in Trimmings, Katarina and Beaumont, Paul (Eds.), International Surrogacy Arrangements (Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing), pp. 427–34.Google Scholar

Erikson, Thomas Hylland, 2007. Globalization: The Key Concepts (Oxford, UK: Berg).Google Scholar

Estin, Ann Laquer, 2014. “Foreign and Religious Law: Comity, Contract, and Constitution,” Pepperdine Law Review, 41(5): 1029–47.Google Scholar

Estin, Ann Laquer, 2012. “Unofficial Family Law” in Nichols, Joel A. (Ed.), Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 92–119.Google Scholar

Estin, Ann Laquar and Barbara, Stark, 2007. Global Issues in Family Law (Eagan, MN: Thomson/West).Google Scholar

Ewick, Patricia, 2004. “Consciousness and Ideology” in Sarat, Austin (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 80–94.Google Scholar

Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan S., 1998. The Common Place of Law (University of Chicago).Google Scholar

Ezer, Nicole Lawrence, 2006. “The Intersection of Immigration Law and Family Law,” Family Law Quarterly, 40(3): 339–66.Google Scholar

Farid, Mahsa, 2012. “International Adoption: The Economics of the Baby Industry,” Whittier Journal of Child and Family Advocacy, 12(1): 81–103.Google Scholar

Finch, Janet, 2007. “Displaying Families,” Sociology, 41(1): 65–81.Google Scholar

Fineman, Albertson Martha, 2001. “Why Marriage?” Virginia Journal of Social Policy & Law, 9: 239–71.Google Scholar

Fishman, Ted C., 2010. Shock of Gray: The Aging of the World’s Population and How It Pits Young Against Old, Child Against Parent, Worker Against Boss, Company against Rival, and Nation Against Nation (New York: Scribner).Google Scholar

Fletcher, Ruth, 2000. National Crisis, Supranational Opportunity: The Irish Constitution of Abortion as a European Service,” Reproductive Health Matters, 8(6): 35–44.Google Scholar

Foblets, Marie-Claire and Vanheule, Dirk, 2006, “Marriage of Convenience in Belgium: the Punitive Approach Gains Ground in Migration Law,” European Journal of Migration and Law, 8(3–4): 263–80.Google Scholar

Fogiel-Bijaoui, Sylvie, 2002. “Familism, Postmodernity and the State: The Case of Israel,” Journal of Israeli History: Politics, Society, Culture, 21(1–2): 38–62.Google Scholar

Fogiel-Bijaoui, Sylvie, 1999. “Families in Israel: Between Familism and Post-Modernism” in Izraeli, Dafna, Friedman, Ariella, Dahan-Kalev, Henriette, Fogiel-Bijaoui, Sylvie, Hassan, Manar, Herzog, Hannah, and Naveh, Hannah (Eds.), Sex, Gender and Politics (Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad), pp. 107–66. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Folberg, Jay and Milne, Ann (Eds.), 1988. Divorce Mediation: Theory and Practice (New York: Guilford Press).Google Scholar

Fonseca, Claudia, 2006. “Transnational Influences in the Social Production of Adoptable Children: The Case of Brazil,” The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(3/4): 154–71.Google Scholar

Fontana, Lorenza B. and Grugel, Jean, 2015. “To Eradicate or to Legalize? Child Labor Debates and ILO Convention 182 in Bolivia,” Global Governance, 21(1): 61–78.Google Scholar

Fournier, Pascale, 2010. Muslim Marriages in Western Courts: Lost in Transplantation (Surrey: Ashgate).Google Scholar

Freeman, Michael, 2007. “Article 3: The Best Interests of the Child” in Alen, André, Vande, Lanotte Johan, Verhallen, Eugeen, Ang, Fiona, Berghmans, Eva, and Verheyde, Mieke (Eds.), A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Leiden: Brill), pp. 1–74.Google Scholar

Freeman, Michael, 1995. “The Morality of Cultural Pluralism,” The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 3: 1–17.Google Scholar

Freeman, Michael D. A., 1999. “A Child’s Right to Circumcision,” BJU International, 83(1): 74–8.Google Scholar

Friedman, May and Schultermandl, Silvia (Eds.), 2011. Growing Up Transnational: Identity and Kinship in a Global Era (University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar

Friedman, Sara L., 2012. “Adjudicating the Intersection of Marital Immigration, Domestic Violence, and Spousal Murder: China Taiwan Marriages and Competing Legal Domains,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 19(1): 221–55.Google Scholar

Friedman, Sara L., 2010.“Determining the ‘Truth’ at the Border: Immigration Interviews, Chinese Marital Migrants, and Taiwan’s Sovereignty Dilemmas,” Citizenship Studies, 14(2): 167–83.Google Scholar

Friedman, Thomas L., 2007. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century (New York.: Picador).Google Scholar

Fuchs, Christian, 2008. Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar

Fun, Cindy C. and San, Mingjie, 2011. “Migration and Split Households: A Comparison of Sole, Couple, and Family Migrants in Beijing, China,” Environment and Planning, 43: 2164–85.Google Scholar

Gangoli, Geetanjali and Chantler, Khatidja, 2009. “Protecting Victims of Forced Marriage: Is Age a Protective Factor?” Feminist Legal Studies, 17(3): 267–88.Google Scholar

Ganster, Paul and Lorey, David E. (Eds.), 2005. Borders and Border Politics in a Globalizing World (Lanham, MD: SR Books).Google Scholar

Gardner, Andrew M., 2011. “Gulf Migration and the Family,” Journal of Arabian Studies, 1(1): 3–25.Google Scholar

Garrison, Marsha and Scott, Elizabeth S., 2012. “Legal Regulation of Twenty-First Century Families” in Garrison, Marsha and Scott, Elizabeth S. (Eds.), Marriage at the Crossroads (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 303–25.Google Scholar

Gesneer, Volkmar and Budak, Ali Cem (Eds.), 1998. Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law (Aldershot: Dartmouth).Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony, 2000. Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping our Lives (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann, 1989. The Transformation of Family Law (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Glennon, Theresa, 2009. “Divided Parents, Shared Children: Conflicting Approaches to Relocation Disputes in the USA” in Boele-Woelki, Katharina (Ed.), Debates in Family Law around the Globe at the Dawn of the 21st Century (Antwerp: Intersentia), pp. 83–106.Google Scholar

Luin, Goldring, 2003. “Re-Thinking Remittances: Social and Political Dimensions of Individual and Collective Remittances,” CERLAC Working Paper Series, York University.Google Scholar

Gollaher, David L., 2000. Circumcision: A History of the World’s Most Controversial Surgery (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar

Gornick, Janet C. and Meyers, Marcia K. (Eds.), 2009. Gender Equality: Transforming Family Divisions of Labor (New York: Verso Press).Google Scholar

Goulbourne, Harry, Reynolds, Tracy, Solomon, John, and Zontint, Elisabetta, 2010. Transnational Families: Ethnicities, Identities and Social Capital (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Graham, Elspeth and Jordan, Lucy P., 2011. “Migrant Parents and the Psychological Well-Being of Left-Behind Children in Southeast Asia,” Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(4): 763–87.Google Scholar

Graycar, Reg, 2012. “Family Law Reform in Australia, or Frozen Chooks Revisited Again?” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 13(1): 241–69.Google Scholar

Green, Ohad and Ayalon, Liat, 2015. “Whose Right is it Anyway? Familiarity with Workers’ Rights among Older Adults, Family Caregivers, and Migrant Live-In Home Care Workers: Implications for Policy and Practice,” Educational Gerontology, 41(7): 471–81.Google Scholar

Green, Sarah, 2012. “A Sense of Border” in Wilson, Thomas M. and Donnan, Hastings (Eds.), A Companion to Border Studies (Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell), pp. 573–92.Google Scholar

Greenberg-Kobrin, Michelle, 2014. “Religious Tribunals and Secular Courts: Navigating Power and Powerlessness,” Pepperdine Law Review, 41(5): 997–1012.Google Scholar

Grey, Colin, 2015. Justice and Authority in Immigration Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar

Gross, Aeyal M., 2007. “In Love with the Enemy: Justice, Truth, Integrity and Common Sense between Israel and Utopia in the Citizenship Law Case,” Hamishpat, 23: 79–85. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Grossberg, Michael, 2000. “How to Give the Present a Past? Family Law in the United States 1950–2000” in Katz, Stanford N., Eekelaar, John, and Maclean, Mavis (Eds.), Cross Currents: Family Law and Policy in the US and England (Oxford University Press), pp. 3–29.Google Scholar

Gruenbaum, Ellen, 2001. The Female Circumcision Controversy: An Anthropological Perspective (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunputh, Rajendra Parsad and Choong, Kartina Aisha, 2015. “Surrogacy Tourism: The Ethical and Legal Challenges,” International Journal of Tourism Sciences, 15(1–2): 16–21.Google Scholar

Hacker, Daphna, 2015. “Strategic Compliance in the Shadow of Transnational Anti-Trafficking Law,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, 28(1): 11–64.Google Scholar

Hacker, Daphna, 2015. “The Rights of the Dead through the Prism of Israeli Succession Disputes,” International Journal of Law in Context, 11(1): 40–58.Google Scholar

Hacker, Daphna, 2014. “Disappointed ‘Heirs’ as a Socio-Legal Phenomenon,” Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 4(2): 243–63.Google Scholar

Hacker, Daphna, 2012. “Religious Tribunals in Democratic States: Lesson from the Israeli Rabbinical Courts,” Journal of Law and Religion, 27(1): 59–82.Google Scholar

Hacker, Daphna, 2011. “Law and Society Jurisprudence,” Cornell Law Review, 96: 727–48.Google Scholar

Hacker, Daphna, 2009. “From the Moabite Ruth to Norly the Filipino: Intermarriage and Conversion in the Jewish Nation State” in Herzog, Hanna and Braude, Ann (Eds.), Gendering Religion and Politics: Untangling Modernities (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 101–24.Google Scholar

Hacker, Daphna, 2008. “A Legal Field in Action: The Case of Divorce Arrangements in Israel,” International Journal of Law in Context, 4(1): 1–33.Google Scholar

Hacker, Daphna, 2001. “Single and Married Women in the Law of Israel – A Feminist Perspective,” Feminist Legal Studies, 9(1): 29–56.Google Scholar

Hacker, Daphna and Halperin, Kaddari Ruth, 2013. “The Ruling Rules in Custody Disputers – On the Dangers of the Parental Sameness Illusion in a Gendered Reality,” Mishpat and Mimshal, 15: 91–170. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Hacker, Daphna and Liberson, Roni, 2010. “Cross Boarders Families in Israel: Between Individualism, Globalization and the Ethnos,” College of Management Law Review, 15(2): 509–29. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Hagestad, Gunhild O., 1991. “The Aging Society as a Context for Family Life” in Jecker, Nancy S. (Ed.), Aging and Ethics: Philosophical Problems in Gerontology (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press), pp. 123–46.Google Scholar

Hall, Elizabeth C., 2011. “Where Are My Children ... and My Rights? Parental Rights Termination as a Consequence of Deportation,” Duke Law Journal, 60(6): 1459–504.Google Scholar

Hallaq, Wael B., 2014. An Introduction to Islamic Law (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Halley, Janet, 2011. “What Is Family Law?: A Genealogy Part I,” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 23(1): 1–109.Google Scholar

Halley, Janet, 2011. “What Is Family Law?: A Genealogy Part II,” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 23(2): 189–293.Google Scholar

Handell, Günther, Zekoll, Joachim, and Zumbansen, Peer, 2012. Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).Google Scholar

Hanson, Karl, Volonakis, Diana, and Al-Rozzi, Mohammed, 2015. “Child Labour, Working Children and Children’s Rights” in Vandenhole, Wouter, Desmet, Ellen, Reynaert, Didier and Lembrechts, Sara (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Children’s Rights Studies (London: Routledge), pp. 316–30.Google Scholar

Hanson, Karl and Vandaele, Arne, 2003. “Working Children and International Labour Law: A Critical Analysis,” The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 11(1): 73–146.Google Scholar

Harari, Yuval Noah, 2012 . Sapiens: A Brief History of Mankind (London: Harvill Secker).Google Scholar

Hargittai, Eszter and Hsieh, Yuli Patick, 2013. “Digital Inequality” in Dutton, William H. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (Oxford University Press), pp. 129–150.Google Scholar

Hashiloni-Dolev, Yael, 2015. “Posthumous Reproduction (PHR) in Israel: Policy Rationales versus Lay People’s Concerns, a Preliminary Study,” Culture Medicine and Psychiatry, 39 (4): 634–50.Google Scholar

Hashiloni-Dolev, Yael, 2013. The Fertility Revolution (Moshav Ben-Shemen: Modan). [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Herring, Jonathan, 2009. Older People in Law and Society (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

High, Anna Jane, 2014. “Pondering the Politicization of Intercountry Adoption: Russia’s Ban on American ‘Forever Families’,” Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law, 22(3): 497–560.Google Scholar

Hill, Twyla J., 2007. “Legalized Grandparenthood: A Content Analysis of State Legislation,” Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 5(2): 61–80.Google Scholar

Hill, Twyla J., 2002. “Grandparents in Law: Investigating the Institutionalization of Extended Family Roles,” The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 54(1): 43–56.Google Scholar

Hing, Bill Ong, 2006. Deporting Our Souls: Values, Morality, and Immigration Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie Russell, 2004. “Love and Gold” in Ehrenreich, Barbara and Hochschild, Arlie Russell (Eds.), Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy (New York: Henry Holt and Company), pp. 15–30.Google Scholar

Hodson, David, 2012. The International Family Law Practice, 2nd edn. (Bristol: Family Law).Google Scholar

Hoff, Andreas, Feldman, Susan, and Vidovicova, Lucie, 2010. “Migrant Home Care Workers Caring for Older People: Fictive Kin, Substitute, and Complementary Family Caregivers in an Ethnically Diverse Environment,” International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 5(2): 7–16.Google Scholar

Holden, Karen C. and Smoke, Pamela J., 1991. “The Economic Costs of Marital Dissolution: Why Do Women Bear a Disproportionate Cost?” Annual Review of Sociology, 17: 51–78.Google Scholar

Holland, Audrey, 2008. “The Modern Family Unit: Towards a More Inclusive Vision of the Family in Immigration Law,” California Law Review, 96(4): 1049–91.Google Scholar

Hong, Kari E., 2014. “Famigration (Fam Imm): The Next Frontier in Immigration Law,” Virginia Law Review Online, 100: 63–81.Google Scholar

Honohan, Iseult, 2009. “Reconsidering the Claim to Family Reunification in Migration,” Political Studies, 57(4): 768–87.Google Scholar

Horn, Vincent, Schweppe, Cornelia, and Um, Seong-gee, 2013. “Transnational Aging – A Young Field of Research,” Transnational Social Review, 3(1): 7–10.Google Scholar

Htun, Mala and Weldon, Laurel S., 2011. “State Power, Religion, and Women’s Rights: A Comparative Analysis of Family Law,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18(1): 145–65.Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan, 1993. Explorations in Law and Society (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan and Wickham, Gary, 1994. Foucault and Law: Towards a Sociology of Law as Governance (London: Pluto Press).Google Scholar

Iecovich, Esther, 2016. “Migrant Homecare Workers in Elder Care: The State of the Art” in Karl, Ute and Torres, Sandra (Eds.), Ageing in Contexts of Migration (Oxon: Routledge), pp. 147–58.Google Scholar

Iecovich, Esther, 2010. “Primary Caregivers and Foreign Caregivers of the Elderly: Variables Explaining Burden and Care Satisfaction of the Primary Caregiver and the Foreign Caregiver,” Research Report, Ben-Gurion University. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Iecovich, Esther, 2007. “Client Satisfaction with Live-in and Live-out Home Care Workers in Israel,” Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 19(4): 105–22.Google Scholar

Iecovich, Esther and Doron, Israel, 2012. “Migrant Workers in Eldercare in Israel: Social and Legal Aspects,” European Journal of Social Work, 15(1): 29–44.Google Scholar

Ikuomola, Adediran Daniel, 2015. “Unintended Consequences of Remittance: Nigerian Migrants and Intra-Household Conflicts,” SAGE Open, 5(3): 1–8, available at: http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/spsgo/5/3/2158244015605353.full.pdf.Google Scholar

Inhorn, Marcia C., 2009. “Rethinking Reproductive ‘Tourism’ as Reproductive ‘Exile,’” Fertility & Sterility, 94 (3): 904–6.Google Scholar

Inlender, Talia, 2009. “Status Quo or Sixth Ground? Adjudicating Gender Asylum Claims” in Benhabib, Seyla and Resnik, Judith (Eds.), Migrations and Mobilities: Citizenship, Borders and Gender (New York University Press), pp. 356–79.Google Scholar

Ippolito, Francesca, 2015. “(De)Constructing Children’s Vulnerability under European Law” in Francesca, Ippolito and Sara, Iglesias Sánchez (Eds.), Protecting Vulnerable Groups: The European Human Rights Framework (Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing), pp. 23–47.Google Scholar

Isin, Engin F. and Turner, Bryan S., 2007. “Investigating Citizenship: An Agenda for Citizenship Studies,” Citizenship Studies, 11(1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Islam, Samir, 2014. “The Negative Effects of Ill-Advised Legislation: The Curious Case of the Evolution of Anti-Sharia Law Legislation into Anti-Foreign Law Legislation and the Impact on the CISG,” Howard Law Journal, 57: 979–1031.Google Scholar

Jabareen, Hassan, 2008. “The Rise of Transnational Lawyering for Human Rights,” Ma’asei Mishpat, 1: 137–51. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Jamieson, Lynn, 2011.“Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalisation or Another Form of Ethnocentricism?” Sociological Research Online, 16(4), available at: https://core.ac.uk/display/6496696.Google Scholar

Jang, Juyoung, Deenanath, Veronica, and Solheim, Catherine A., 2015. “Family Members’ Transnational Migration, Community Contexts, and Psychological Distress in Mexican Families,” Family Science Review, 20(2): 94–112.Google Scholar

Jeppesen, de Boer Christina G., 2009. “Parental Relocation, Free Movement Rights and Joint Parenting” in Boele-Woelki, Katharina (Ed.), Debates in Family Law around the Globe at the Dawn of the 21st Century (Antwerp: Intersentia), pp. 107–20.Google Scholar

Johnson, Kay, 2002. “Politics of International and Domestic Adoption in China,” Law & Society Review, 36(2): 379–96.Google Scholar

Joppke, Christian, 2007. “Transformation of Citizenship: Status, Rights, Identity,” Citizenship Studies, 11(1): 37–48.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Yehiel, 2005. “Solving the Distress of Women who are Refused a Get through Punitive Alimony,” Hamishpat, 10: 381–448. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Karandikar, Sharvari, Gezinski, Lindsay B., Carter, James R., and Kaloga, Marissa, 2014. “Economic Necessity or Noble Cause? A Qualitative Study Exploring Motivations for Gestational Surrogacy in Gujarat, India,” Journal of Women and Social Work, 29(2): 224–36.Google Scholar

Karl, Ute and Torres, Sandra (Eds.), 2016. Ageing in Contexts of Migration (Oxon: Routledge).Google Scholar

Karner, Tracy X., 1998. “Professional Caring: Homecare Workers as Fictive Kin,” Journal of Aging Studies, 12(1): 69–82.Google Scholar

Katz, Ruth, Lowenstein, Ariela, and Brick, Yitzhak, 2010. “Intergenerational Relations and Old-Age in the Modern Era: Cross-Country Comparisons” in Brick, Yitzhak and Lowenstein, Ariela (Eds.), The Elderly and the Family: Multi-Generational Aspects of Aging (Jerusalem: Eshel). pp. 53–71. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Katz, Stanford N., Eekelaar, John, and Maclean, Mavis (Eds.), 2000. Cross Currents: Family Law and Policy in the United States and England (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Kearney, M., 1995. “The Local and the Global: The Anthropology of Globalization and Transnationalism,” Annual Review of Anthropology, 24: 547–65.Google Scholar

Kelly, Joan B. and Emery, Robert E., 2003. “Children’s Adjustment Following Divorce: Risk and Resilience Perspectives,” Family Relations, 52(4): 352–62.Google Scholar

Kemp, Adriana, 2007. “Managing Migration, Reprioritizing National Citizenship: Undocumented Migrant Workers’ Children and Policy Reforms in Israel,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 663–91.Google Scholar

Kenichi, Ohmae, 1990. The Borderless World (New York: Harper Business).Google Scholar

Kesby, Alison, 2012. The Right to Have Rights: Citizenship, Humanity, and International Law (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Khamasi, Jennifer Wanjiku, 2015. “Transcending Female Circumcision: A Call for Collective Unmasking” in Longman, Chia and Bradley, Tamsin (Eds.), Interrogating Harmful Cultural Practices: Gender, Culture and Coercion (London: Routledge), pp. 99–110.Google Scholar

Khan, Almas, 2006. “The Interaction between Shariah and International Law in Arbitration,” Chicago Journal of International Law, 6(2): 791–802.Google Scholar

Kim, Jaeeun, 2011. “Establishing Identity: Documents, Performance, and Biometric Information in Immigration Proceedings,” Law & Social Inquiry, 36(3): 760–86.Google Scholar

Kojima, Yu, 2001. “In the Business of Cultural Reproduction: Theoretical Implications of the Mail-Order Bride Phenomenon,” Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(2): 199–210.Google Scholar

Kourlis, Rebecca Love, Taylor, Melinda, Schepard, Andrew, and Pruett, Marsha Kline, 2013. “Iaals’ Honoring Families Initiative: Courts and Communities Helping Families in Transition Arising from Separation or Divorce,” Family Court Review, 51(3): 351–76.Google Scholar

Kricheli-Katz, Tamar, 2012. “Choice, Discrimination and the Motherhood Penalty,” Law & Society Review, 46(3): 557–87.Google Scholar

Kritzman-Amir, Tali, 2015. “Iterations of the Family: Parents, Children and Mixed-Status Families,” Minnesota Journal of International Law, 24(2): 245–311.Google Scholar

Kroløkke, Charlotte, 2009. “Click a Donor,” Journal of Consumer Culture, 9(1): 7–30.Google Scholar

Kron, Stefanie, 2011. “The Border as Method: Towards an Analysis of Political Subjectivities in Transmigrant Spaces” in Wastl-Walter, Dorit (Ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies (Surrey: Ashgate), pp. 103–20.Google Scholar

Kubitschek, Carolyn A., 2014. “Failure of the Hague Abduction Convention to Address Domestic Violence and Its Consequences” in Rains, Robert E. (Ed.), The 1980 Hague Abduction Convention, Comparative Aspects (London: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing), pp. 132–53.Google Scholar

Kunz, Rahel, 2016. “‘Moneymaker and Mother from Afar’: The Power of Gender Myths” in van Naerssen, Ton, Smith, Lothar, Davids, Tine and Marchand, Marianne H. (Eds.), Women, Gender, Remittances and Development in the Global South (London: Routledge), pp. 207–28.Google Scholar

Kutty, Faisal, 2010. “The Myth and Reality of Shari’a Courts in Canada: A Delayed Opportunity for the Indigenization of Islamic Legal Rulings,” University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 7(3): 559–602.Google Scholar

Theodora, Lam, Yeoh, Brenda S. A., and Anh, Hoang Lan, 2013. “Transnational Migration and Changing Care Arrangements for Left-Behind Children in Southeast Asia: A Selective Literature Review in Relation to the CHAMPSEA Study,” Working Paper Series No. 207, Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar

Lamont, Michèle and Virág, Molnár, 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences,” Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 167–95.Google Scholar

Landes, Elisabeth M. and Posner, Richard A., 1978. “The Economics of the Baby Shortage,” Journal of Legal Studies, 7(2): 323–48.Google Scholar

Lansdown, Gerison, 2010. “The Realisation of Children’s Participation Rights: Critical Reflections” in Percy-Smith, Bary and Thomas, Nigel (Eds.), A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation: Perspectives from Theory and Practice (London: Routledge), pp. 11–23.Google Scholar

Lapidoth, Ruth and Friesel, Ofra, 2010. “Some Reflections on Israel’s Temporary Legislation on Unification of Families,” Israel Law Review, 43(2): 457–567.Google Scholar

Lechner, Frank J. and Boli, John (Eds.), 2012. The Globalization Reader, 4th edn. (Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar

Leckey, Robert, 2008. Contextual Subjects: Family, State, and Relational Theory (University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar

Lee, Catherine, 2015. “Family Reunification and the Limits of Immigration Reform: Impact and Legacy of the 1965 Immigration Act,” Sociological Forum, 30(S1): 528–48.Google Scholar

Lee, Donna R., 1998. “Mail Fantasy: Global Sexual Exploitation in the Mail-Order Bride Industry and Proposed Legal Solutions,” Asian American Law Journal, 5: 139–79.Google Scholar

Lee, Hye-Kyung, 2013. “Marriage Migration” in Immanuel, Ness (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444351071.wbeghm353/abstract.Google Scholar

Leinonen, Johanna and Pellander, Saara, 2014. “Court Decisions over Marriage Migration in Finland: A Problem with Transnational Family Ties,” Journal of Ethics and Migration Studies, 40(9): 1488–506.Google Scholar

Leiter, Brian, 1999. “Positivism, Formalism, Realism,” Columbia Law Review, 99: 1138–64.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude, 1955. “The Structural Study of Myth,” The Journal of American Folklore, 68(270): 428–44.Google Scholar

Levin, Irene, 2004. “Living Apart Together: A New Family Form,” Current Sociology, 52(2): 223–40.Google Scholar

Levine, James A., 2011. “Poverty and Obesity in the U.S.,” Diabetes, 60: 2667–8.Google Scholar

Liebel, Manfred, 2015. “Protecting the Rights of Working Children Instead of Banning Child Labour: Bolivia Tries a New Legislative Approach,” The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 23(3): 529–47.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Lindsay, 2010. “Protecting Pageant Princesses: A Call for Statutory Regulation of Child Beauty Pageants,” Journal of Law and Policy, 18(2): 739–74.Google Scholar

Lifshitz, Shahar, 2012. “The Liberal Transformation of Spousal Law: Past, Present, and Future,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 13(1):15–75.Google Scholar

Lifshitz, Shahar, 2005. Cohabitation Law in Israel: In Light of a Civil Law Theory of the Family (Haifa University Press). [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Lillie, Nathan, 2016. “The Right Not to Have Rights: Posted Worker Acquiescence and the European Union Labor Rights Framework,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 17(1): 39–62.Google Scholar

Lindhorst, Taryn and Edleson, Jeffrey L., 2012. Battered Women, Their Children, And International Law: The Unintended Consequences of the Hague Child Abduction Convention (Lebanon, NH: Northeastern University Press).Google Scholar

Lister, Ruth, 2007. “Inclusive Citizenship: Realizing the Potential,” Citizenship Studies, 11(1): 49–61.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Kathryn A., 2000. “Wives for Sale: The Modern International Mail Order Bride Industry,” Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 20(2): 341–67.Google Scholar

Longman, Chia and Bradley, Tamsin (Eds.), 2015. Interrogating Harmful Cultural Practices: Gender, Culture and Coercion (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

López, Jane Lilly, 2015. ““Impossible Families”: Mixed-Citizenship Status Couples and the Law,” Law & Policy, 37(1–2): 93–118.Google Scholar

Lowe, Nigel V. and Stephens, Victoria, 2012. “Global Trends in the Operation of the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention,” Family Law Quarterly, 46(1): 41–85.Google Scholar

Lowell, Lindsay B., Martin, Susan, and Stone, Robyn, 2010. “Ageing and Care Giving in the United States: Policy Contexts and the Immigrant Workforce,” Population Ageing, 3(1): 59–82.Google Scholar

Lowenstein, Ariela and Katz, Ruth. 2010. “Taking Care of the Elderly – What is the Desirable Balance between the Family and the State?” in Brick, Yitzhak and Lowenstein, Ariela (Eds.), The Elderly and the Family: Multi-Generational Aspects of Aging (Jerusalem: Eshel), pp. 40–51. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Maccoby, Eleanor E. and Mnookin, Robert H., 1992. Dividing the Child: Social and Legal Dilemmas of Custody (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Macfarlane, Julia, 2012. Islamic Divorce in North America: A Shari’a Path in a Secular Society (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

MacIntosh, Constance, 2010. “Domestic Violence and Gender Based Persecution: How Refugee Adjudicators Judge Women Seeking Refuge from Spousal Violence-and Why Reform is Needed,” Refuge, 26(2): 147–64.Google Scholar

McIntosh, Jennifer, Bruce, Smyth, Margaret, Kelaher, Yvonne, Wells, and Caroline, Long, 2010. “Post-Separation Parenting Arrangements: Patterns and Developmental Outcomes for Infants and Children,” collected reports prepared for the Australian Government Attorney General’s Department available at: www.ag.gov.au/FamiliesAndMarriage/Families/FamilyViolence/Documents/Post%20separation%20parenting%20arrangements%20and%20developmental%20outcomes%20for%20infants%20and%20children.pdf.Google Scholar

Macklin, Audrey, 2007. “Who is the Citizen’s Other? Considering the Heft of citizenship,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 333–66.Google Scholar

Maclean, Mavis and Eekelaar, John, 2014. “Institutional Mechanisms: Courts, Lawyers and Others” in Eekelaar, John and George, Rob (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Family Law and Policy (Abingdon: Routledge Handbooks), pp. 372–80.Google Scholar

MacMaster, Neil, 2007. “The Colonial “Emancipation” of Algerian Women: the Marriage Law of 1959 and the Failure of Legislation on Women’s Rights in the Post-Independence Era,” Vienna Journal of African Studies, 12: 91–116.Google Scholar

Mahar, Heather, 2003. “Why Are There so Few Prenuptial Agreements?,” Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business Discussion Paper Series, Paper 436, available at: www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/papers/pdf/436.pdf.Google Scholar

Mahler, Sarah J., 2001. “Transnational Relationships: The Struggle to Communicate across Borders,” Identities, 7(4) 583–619.Google Scholar

Mahr, Jessie M., 2008. “Protecting Our Vulnerable Citizens: Birthright Citizenship and the Call for Recognition of Constructed Deportation,” Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 32(3): 723–47.Google Scholar

Malhotra, Anil and Malhotra, Ranjit, 2012. “All Aboard for the Fertility Express,” Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 38(1): 31–41.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronislaw, 1939. “The Group and the Individual in Functional Analysis,” American Journal of Sociology, 44(6): 938–64.Google Scholar

Merin, Yuval, 2005. “The Right to Family Life and Civil Marriage under International Law and its Implementation in the State of Israel,” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 28(1): 79–147.Google Scholar

Marsden, Jessica, 2014. “Domestic Violence Asylum After Matter of L-R,” The Yale Law Journal, 123(7): 2512–57.Google Scholar

Marson, Alison A., 1997. “Planning for Love: The Politics of Prenuptial Agreements,” Stanford Law Review, 49: 887–916.Google Scholar

Martin, Susan Ehrlich and Jurik, Nancy C., 2007. Doing Justice, Doing Gender: Women in Legal and Criminal Justice Occupations, 2nd edn. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).Google Scholar

Mascarenhas, Maya N., Flaxman, Seth R., Boerma, Ties, Vanderpoel, Sheryl, and Stevens, Gretchen A., 2012. “National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence Since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys”, Plos Medicine, 9(12): e1001356, available at: www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001356#s3.Google Scholar

Mauro, Guillén F., 2001. “Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive or Feeble? A Critique of Five Key Debates in the Social Science Literature,” Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 235–60.Google Scholar

Mautner, Menachem, 2011. “Three Approaches to Law and Culture,” Cornell Law Review, 96(4): 839–68.Google Scholar

Mavunga, R.A., 2013. “A Critical Assessment of the Minimum Age Convention 138 of 1973 and The Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention 182 of 1999,” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 16(5): 121–68, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2427729.Google Scholar

Mayers, William E., 2001. “The Right Rights? Child Labor in a Globalizing World,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 575: 38–55.Google Scholar

Mazuz, Keren, 2013. “The Familial Dyad between Aged Patients and Filipina Caregivers in Israel: Eldercare and Bodily-Based Practices in the Jewish Home,” Anthropology & Aging Quarterly, 34(3): 126–34.Google Scholar

Mazuz, Keren, 2013. “The State of the Jewish Family: Eldercare as a Practice of Corporeal Symbiosis by Filipina Migrant Workers” in Markowitz, Fran (Ed.), Ethnographic Encounters in Israel: Poetics and Ethics of Fieldwork (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press),pp. 97–111.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, Valentina, 2013. “Transnational Families, Research and Scholarship” in Immanuel, Ness (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration,available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444351071.wbeghm541/pdf.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, Valentina, Schans, Djamila, Caarls, Kim and Beauchemin, Cris, 2015. “Transnational Families between Africa and Europe,” International Migration Review, 49(1): 142–72.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, Valentina and Djamila, Schans, 2011. “Transnational Families and the Well‐Being of Children: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges,” Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(4): 704–12.Google Scholar

McClain, Linda C., 2012. “Marriage Pluralism in the United States: On Civil and Religious Jurisdiction and the Demands of Equal Citizenship” in Nichols, Joel A. (Ed.), Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 309–40.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, Julia Halloran, 2007. “Premarital Agreements and Choice of Law: ‘One, Two, Three, Baby, You and Me’,” Missouri Law Review, 72(3): 793–854.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, Julia Halloran, 2003. “Should Marital Property Rights Be Inalienable? Preserving the Marriage Ante,” Nebraska Law Review, 82(3): 460–98.Google Scholar

McWilliams, Monica, Priyamvada, Yarnell N. R., and Churchill, Molly, 2015. “Forced Dependency and Legal Barriers: Implications of the UK’s Immigration and Social Security Policies for Minoritized Women Living in Abusive Intimate Relationships in Northern Ireland,” Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 5(6): 1536–56.Google Scholar

Meier, Patricia J. and Zhang, Xiaole, 2008. “Sold into Adoption: The Hunan Baby Trafficking Scandal Exposes Vulnerabilities in Chinese Adoptions to the United States,” Cumberland Law Review, 39(1), 87–130.Google Scholar

Meisels, Judith, 2014. “Reflections on the Centrality of Genetics in Parenting Following HCJ 566/11 Mamet v. Ministry of Interior Affairs,” Mivzakey Hearot Psika, 28: 46–56, available at: https://www.colman.ac.il/sites/default/files/28_june_2014_5_meisels.pdf. [Hebrew]Google Scholar

Menjívar, Cecilia and Salcido, Olivia, 2002. “Immigrant Women and Domestic Violence, Common Experiences in Different Countries,” Gender & Society, 16(6): 898–920.Google Scholar

Menzel, Peter and D’Aluisi, Faith, 2005. Hungry World: What the World Eats (Napa, CA: Material World Books).Google Scholar

Mercurio, Bryan, 2003. “Abortion in Ireland: An Analysis of the Legal Transformation Resulting from Membership in the European Union,” Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 11:141–80.Google Scholar

Meria, Laura (Ed.), 2014. Transnational Families, Migration and the Circulation of Care: Understanding Mobility and Absence in Family Life (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar

Merkel, Reinhard and Putzke, Holm, 2013. “After Cologne: Male Circumcision and The Law. Parental Right, Religious Liberty or Criminal Assault?” Journal of Medical Ethics, 39: 444–9.Google Scholar

Merry, Sally Engle, 2003. “Constructing a Global Law- Violence against Women and the Human Rights System,” Law & Social Inquiry, 28(4): 941–77.Google Scholar

Mezmur, Benyan Dawit, 2012. “Acting Like a Rich Bully: Madonna, Mercy, Malawi, and International Children’s Rights Law in Adoption,” International Journal of Children’s Rights, 20(1): 24–56.Google Scholar

Michie, Jonathan (Ed.), 2011. The Handbook of Globalization, 2nd edn. (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar

Milanovic, Branko, 2013. “Global Income Inequality in Numbers: In History and Now,” Global Policy, 4(2): 198–208.Google Scholar

Milanovic, Branko, 2012. “Evolution of Global Inequality: From Class to Location, from Proletarians to Migrants,” Global Policy, 3(2): 125–34.Google Scholar

Milanovic, Branko, 2007. “Globalization and Inequity” in Held, David and Kaya, Ayse (Eds.), Global Inequality (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 26–49.Google Scholar

Minow, Martha and Shanley, Mary Lyndon, 1996. “Relational Rights and Responsibilities: Revisioning the Family in Liberal Political Theory and Law,” Hypatia, 11(1): 4–29.Google Scholar

Mnookin, Robert H. and Kornhauser, Lewis, 1979. “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce,” Yale Law Journal, 88: 950–96.Google Scholar

Modelski, George, Devezas, Tessaleno and William, Thompson R. (Eds.), 2008. Globalization as Evolutionary Process (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Morag, Tamar, Rivkin, Dori, and Sorek, Yoa, 2012. “Child Participation in the Family Courts – Lessons from the Israeli Pilot Project,” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 26(1):1–30.Google Scholar

Morgan, David H. J., 2011. Rethinking Family Practices (Basingstoke: Palgrave).Google Scholar

Morgan, David H. J., 1996. Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Google Scholar

Morris, Brian J. and Krieger, John N., 2013. “Does Male Circumcision Affect Sexual Function, Sensitivity, or Satisfaction?- A Systematic Review,” Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10(11): 2644–57.Google Scholar

Moskowitz, Seymour, 2002. “Adult Children and Indigent Parents: Intergenerational Responsibilities in International Perspective,” Marquette Law Review, 86(3): 401–55.Google Scholar

Mullally, Siobhan, 2011. “Domestic Violence Asylum Claims and Recent Developments in International Human Rights Law: A Progress Narrative?” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60(2): 459–84.Google Scholar

Mulongo, Peggy, McAndrew, Sue, and Martin, Caroline H., 2014. “Crossing Borders: Discussing the Evidence Relating to the Mental Health Needs of Women Exposed to Female Genital Mutilation,” International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 23(4): 296–305.Google Scholar

Mundlak, Guy, 2007. “Industrial Citizenship, Social Citizenship, Corporate Citizenship: I Just Want My Wages,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 719–48.Google Scholar

Mundlak, Guy and Shamir, Hila, 2011. “Bringing Together or Drifting Apart? Targeting Care Work as “Work Like no Other,” Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 23(1): 289–308.Google Scholar

Mundlak, Guy and Shamir, Hila, 2008. “Between Intimacy and Alienage: The Legal Construction of Domestic and Care Work in the Welfare State” in Lutz, Helma (Ed.), Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme (New York: Routledge), pp. 161–76.Google Scholar

Munjal, Diksha and Munjal, Yahita, 2014. “The “Wanted” Child: Identifying the Gaps and Challenges in Commercial Surrogacy in India,” Asian Bioethics Review, 6(1): 66–82.Google Scholar

Musalo, Karen, 2007. “Protecting Victims of Gendered Persecution: Fear of Floodgates or Call to (Principled) Action?” Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 14(2): 119–43.Google Scholar

Mutcherson, Kimberly M., 2013. “Open Fertility Borders: Defending Access to Cross-Border Fertility Care in the United States” in Glenn, Cohen (Ed.), The Globalization of Health Care: Legal and Ethical Issues (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 148–63.Google Scholar

Muthumbi, Jane, Svanemyr, Joar, Scolaro, Elisa, Temmerman, Marleen, and Say, Lale, 2015. “Female Genital Mutilation: A Literature Review of the Current Status of Legislation and Policies in 27 African Countries and Yemen,” African Journal of Reproductive Health, 19(3): 32–40.Google Scholar

Myrdahl, Eileen Muller, 2010. “Legislating Love: Norwegian Family Reunification Law as a Racial Project,” Social & Cultural Geography, 11(2): 103–16.Google Scholar

Narayanan, Usha, 1996. “The Government’s Role in Fostering the Relationship between Adult Children and their Elder Parents: From Filial Responsibility Laws to ... What? A Cross-Cultural Perspective,” Elder Law Journal, 4: 369–406.Google Scholar

Neagu, Mariela, 2015. “Children by Request: Romania’s Children between Rights and International Politics,” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 29(2): 215–36.Google Scholar

Nelson Julie A., 2012. “Are Women Really More Risk-Averse than Men?” Global Development and Environment Institute, Working Paper No. 12-05, Tufts University.Newman, David, 2011. “Contemporary Research Agendas in Border Studies: An Overview” in Wastl-Walter, Dorit (Ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies (Surrey: Ashgate), pp. 33–47.Google Scholar

Newman, David, 2006. “The Lines that Continue to Separate Us: Borders in our ‘Borderless’ World,” Progress in Human Geography, 30(2): 143–61.Google Scholar

Newman, Jonah, 2012. “Whose Home? The Role of Jewish Identity in Israel’s Policy towards the Children of Foreign Workers,” Washington University International Review, 1: 42–54.Google Scholar

Nhenga-Chakarisa, Tendai Charity, 2010. “Who Does the Law Seek to Protect and from What? The Application of International Law on Child Labour in an African Context,” African Human Rights Law Journal, 10(1): 161–96.Google Scholar

Nichols, Joel A., 2012. “Multi-Tiered Marriage” in Nichols, Joel A. (Ed.), Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 11–50.Google Scholar

Nieuwenhuys, Olga, 1996. “The Paradox of Child Labor and Anthropology,” Annual Review of Anthropology, 25 (1): 237–51.Google Scholar

Noguchi, Yoshie, 2010. “20 Years of the Convention on the Rights of the Child and International Action against Child Labour,” The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 18(4): 515–34.Google Scholar

Nyers, Peter, 2007. “Introduction: Why Citizenship Studies,” Citizenship Studies, 11(1): 1–4.Google Scholar

Nygren, Karl, Adamson, David, Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando, and de Mouzon, Jacques, 2010. “Cross-Border Fertility Care – International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies Global Survey: 2006 Data and Estimates,” Fertility and Sterility, 94(1): e4–e10, available at: www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)04298-8/pdf.Google Scholar

Nwaogu, Uwaoma G. and Ryan, Michael J., 2015. “FDI, Foreign Aid, Remittance and Economic Growth in Developing Countries,” Review of Development Economics, 19(1): 100–15.Google Scholar

Obrien, John, 1999. Conflict of Laws, 2nd edn. (London: Cavendish).Google Scholar

O’Halloran, Kerry, 2015. The Politics of Adoption: International Perspectives on Law, Policy and Practice, 3rd edn. (Dordrecht: Springer).Google Scholar

Okin, Moller Susan, 1999. “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?” in Joshua, Howard Matthew and Nussbaum, Martha C. (Eds.), Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999), pp.7–26.Google Scholar

Okin, Moller Suzan, 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar

Okyere, Samuel, 2013. “Are Working Children’s Rights and Child Labour Abolition Complementary or Opposing Realms?” International Social Work, 56(1): 80–91.Google Scholar

Olsen, Frances E., 1985. “The Myth of State Intervention in the Family,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 18: 835–64.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Mary, Bagheri, Parisa, and Sarnicola, Alexis, 2015. “Forgotten Children of Immigration and Family Law: How The Absence of Legal Aid Affects Children in the United States,” Family Court Review, 53(4): 676–97.Google Scholar

Ong, Debbie, 2012. “Prenuptial Agreements Affirming TQ v. TR in Singapore,” Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 24: 402–32.Google Scholar

Orgad, Liav, 2008. “Love and War: Family Migration in Time of National Emergency,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 23(1): 85–127.Google Scholar

Paasi, Anssi, 2011. “A Border Theory: An Unattainable Dream or a Realistic Aim for Border Scholars?” in Wastl-Walter, Dorit (Ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies (Surrey: Ashgate), pp. 11–31.Google Scholar

Palacios, Jesús, 2015. “Crisis in Intercountry Adoption, Crisis in Adoptive Families,” Family Science, 6(1): 43–9.Google Scholar

Pande, Amrita, 2010. ““At Least I Am Not Sleeping with Anyone”: Resisting the Stigma of Commercial Surrogacy in India,” Feminist Studies, 36(2): 292–312.Google Scholar

Pande, Amrita, 2010. “Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect ‘Mother-Worker’,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35(4): 969–92.Google Scholar

Pande, Amrita, 2009. “‘It May Be Her Eggs but It’s My Blood’: Surrogates and Everyday Forms of Kinship in India,” Qualitative Sociology, 32(4), 379–405.Google Scholar

Pande, Amrita, 2009. “Not an ‘Angel’,” Not a ‘Whore’: Surrogates as ‘Dirty’ Workers in India,” Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 16(2): 141–73.Google Scholar

Panitch, Vida, 2013. “Global Surrogacy: Exploitation to Empowerment,” Journal of Global Ethics, 9(3): 329–43.Google Scholar

Panitch, Vida, 2013. “Surrogate Tourism and Reproductive Rights,” Hypatia, 28(2): 274–89.Google Scholar

Parness, Jeffrey A., 2014. “Parentage Prenups and Midnups,” Georgia State University Law Review, 31(2): 343–76.Google Scholar

Parreñas, Salazar Rhacel, 2005. Children of Global Migration: Transnational Families and Gendered Woes (CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar

Parreñas, Salazar Rhacel, 2004. “The Care Crisis in the Philippines: Children and Transnational Families in the New Global Economy” in Ehrenreich, Barbara and Hochschild, Arlie Russell (Eds.), Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy (New York: Henry Holt and Company), pp. 39–54.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott, 1964. Social Structure and Personality (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar

Pearson, Jessica, 2000. “A Forum for Every Fuss: The Growth of Court Services and ADR Treatment for Family Law Cases in the United States” in Katz, Stanford N., Eekelaar, John and Maclean, Mavis (Eds.), Cross Currents: Family Law and Policy in the US and England (Oxford University Press), pp. 513–31.Google Scholar

Pearson, Katherine C., 2013. “Filial Support Laws in the Modern Era: Domestic and International Comparison of Enforcement Practices for Laws Requiring Adult Children to Support Indigent Parents,” Elder Law Journal, 20: 269–314.Google Scholar

Peled, Yoav, 2007. “Citizenship Betrayed: Israel’s Emerging Immigration and Citizenship Regime,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 603–28.Google Scholar

Peterson, Richard R., 1996. “A Re-Evaluation of the Economic Consequences of Divorce,” American Sociological Review, 61(3): 528–36.Google Scholar

Phillips, Anne and Dustin, Moira, 2004. “UK Initiatives on Forced Marriage: Regulation, Dialogue and Exit,” Political Studies, 52: 531–51.Google Scholar

Plummer, Ken, 2003. Intimate Citizenship, Private Decision and Public Dialogue (Seattle: University of Washington Press).Google Scholar

Polikoff, Nancy, 2008. Beyond (Straight and Gay) Marriage, Valuing All Families under the Law (Boston: Beacon Press).Google Scholar

Quillen, Brian, 2014. “The New Face of International Child Abduction: Domestic-Violence Victims and Their Treatment Under the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,” Texas International Law Journal, 49(3): 621–43.Google Scholar

Rabin, Nina, 2013. “At the Border between Public and Private: U.S. Immigration Policy for Victims of Domestic Violence,” Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 7(1): 109–53.Google Scholar

Rafiq, Aayesha, 2014. “Child Custody in Classical Islamic Law and Laws of Contemporary Muslim World (An Analysis),” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(5): 267–77.Google Scholar

Rains, Robert E., 2011. “A Prenup for Prince William and Kate? England Inches Toward Twentieth Century Law of Antenuptial Agreements: How Shall It Enter the Twenty-First?” Florida Journal of International Law, 23: 447–80.Google Scholar

Raiti, Gerard C., 2007. “Mobile Intimacy: Theories on the Economics of Emotion with Examples from Asia,” Journal of Media and Culture, 10(1), available at: http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0703/02-raiti.php.Google Scholar

Ram, Uri, 2012. “McDonaldization” in Ritzer, George (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 342–7.Google Scholar

Randall, Melanie, 2015. “Particularized Social Groups and Categorical Imperatives in Refugee Law: State Failures to Recognize Gender and the Legal Reception of Gender Persecution Claims in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States,” Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 23(4): 529–71.Google Scholar

Larry, Ray, 2007. Globalization and Everyday Life (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Roach, Anleu Sharyn, 1992. “Women in The Legal Profession: Theory and Research,” Law Institutional Journal, 66: 193–208.Google Scholar

Roberts, Albert R. (Ed.), 2007. Battered Women and Their Families: Intervention Strategies and Treatment Programs, 3rd edn. (New York: Springer).Google Scholar

Robertson, Roland, 2012. “Globalisation or Glocalisation?” Journal of International Communication, 18(2): 191–208.Google Scholar

Rogerson, Sarah, 2013. “Lack of Detained Parents’ Access to the Family Justice System and the Unjust Severance of the Parent-Child Relationship,” Family Law Quarterly, 47(2): 141–72.Google Scholar

Rome, Sunny Harris, 2010. “Promoting Family Integrity: The Child Citizen Protection Act and Its Implications for Public Child Welfare,” Journal of Public Child Welfare, 4(3): 245–62.Google Scholar

Root, Veronica S., 2007. “Angelina and Madonna: Why all the Fuss? An Exploration of the Rights of the Child and Intercountry Adoption within African Nations,” Chicago Journal of International Law, 8(1): 323–54.Google Scholar

Ross, Allison E., 2008. “Taking Care of Our Caretakers: Using Filial Responsibility Laws to Support the Elderly beyond the Government’s Assistance,” Elder Law Journal, 16: 167–209.Google Scholar

Rossiter, Ann, 2009. Ireland Hidden Diaspora: The ‘Abortion Trial’ and the Making of a London-Irish Underground, 1980–2000 (London: IASC Publishing).Google Scholar

Rudrappa, Sharmila, 2012. “Working India’s Reproduction Assembly Line: Surrogacy and Reproduction Rights?” Western Humanities Review, 66(3): 77–101.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, 2014. “Global Governance and ““New Governance Theory”“: Lessons from Business and Human Rights,” Global Governance, 20: 5–17.Google Scholar

Sabar, Galia, 2012. “African Migrant Workers in Israel: Between Extended Family, Money and a Sense of Evil” in Toledano, Ehud R. (Ed.), African Communities in Asia and the Mediterranean: Between Integration and Conflict (London: Africa World Press), pp. 255–84.Google Scholar

Salami, Bukola, Duggleby, Wendy, and Rajani, Fahreen, 2016. “The Perspectives of Employers/ Families and Care Recipients of Migrant Live – In Caregivers: A Scoping Review,” Health and Social Care in the Community, 1–12, available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hsc.12330/epdf.Google Scholar

Samonova, Elena, 2014. “Socioeconomic Impacts of Child Labour,” Journal of Education, Psychology and Social Sciences, 2(1): 50–4.Google Scholar

Sănduleasa, Bertha and Matei, Aniela, 2015. “Effects of Parental Migration on Families and Children in Post-Communist Romania,” Revista de Stiinte Politice, 46: 196–207.Google Scholar

Sanger, Carol, 2006. “A Case for Civil Marriage,” Cardozo Law Review, 27: 1311–23.Google Scholar

Sarat, Austin and Silbey, Susan S., 1998. “The Pull of the Audience,” Law & Policy, 10(2–3): 97–166.Google Scholar

Saravanan, Sheela, 2013. “An Ethnomethodological Approach to Examine Exploitation in the Context of Capacity, Trust and Experience of Commercial Surrogacy in India,” Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 8(10), available at: http://peh-med.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1747-5341-8-10.Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, 2007. A Sociology of Globalization (New York: W. W. Norton).Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, 2003. “Globalization or Denationalization?” Review of International Political Economy, 10(1): 1–22.Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Schiff, Berman Paul, 2012. Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Schiratzki, Johanna, 2011. “Banning God’s Law in the Name of the Holy Body – The Nordic Position on Ritual Male Circumcision,” The Family in Law, 5: 35–53.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Garbi, 2014. “Troubled by Law: The Subjectivizing Effects of Danish Marriage Reunification Laws,” International Migration, 52(3): 129–43.Google Scholar

Scholte, Jan Aart, 2005. Globalization: A Critical Introduction, 2nd edn. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar

Schuerkens, Ulrike, 2010. “Theoretical and Empirical Introduction: Globalization and Transformation of Social Inequality” in Schuerkens, Ulrike (Ed.), Globalization and Transformation of Social Inequality (New York: Routledge), pp. 3–28.Google Scholar

Schueths, April M., 2012. “‘Where are My Rights?’ Compromised Citizenship in Mixed-Status Marriage: A Research Note,” Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 39(4): 97–109.Google Scholar

Schueths, April and Lawston, Jodie (Eds.), 2015. Living Together Living Apart: Mixed Status Families and US Immigration Policy (Seattle: University of Washington Press).Google Scholar

Schuz, Rhona, 2015. “The Dangers of Children’s Rights’ Discourse in the Political Arena: The Issue of Religious Male Circumcision as a Test Case,” Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender, 21: 347–91.Google Scholar

Schuz, Rhona, 2013. The Hague Child Abduction Convention: A Critical Analysis, Studies in Private International Law (Portland, OR: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar

Schuz, Rhona, 1997. A Modern Approach to the Incidental Question (Netherlands: Springer).Google Scholar

Schuz, Rhona, 1996. “Divorce and Ethnic Minorities” in Michael, Freeman (Ed.), Divorce: Where Next? (Aldershot: Dartmouth), pp. 131–57.Google Scholar

Schwiter, Karin, Berndt, Christian, and Truong, Jasmine, 2015. “Neoliberal Austerity and the Marketization of Elderly Care,” Social & Cultural Geography, 1–21, available at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14649365.2015.1059473.Google Scholar

Sear, Rebecca, Lawson, David W., Kaplan, Hillard, and Shenk, Mary K., 2016. “Understanding Variation in Human Fertility: What Can We Learn from Evolutionary Demography?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371: 20150144, available at: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royptb/371/1692/20150144.full.pdf.Google Scholar

Selby, Jessica, 2008. “Ending Abusive and Exploitative Child Labour Through International Law and Practical Action,” Australian International Law Journal, 15: 165–80.Google Scholar

Selman, Peter, 2015. “Intercountry Adoption of Children from Asia in the Twenty-First Century,” Children’s Geographies, 13(3): 312–27.Google Scholar