Alvarez, José, International Organizations as Law-makers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Arsić-Đapo, Jasna, ‘Another Brick in the Wall: Building Up the OSCE as an International Organization One Agreement at a Time’, International Organizations Law Review 14 (2017), 414–29.Google Scholar

Barros, Ana Sofia and Ryngaert, Cedric, ‘The Position of Member States in (Autonomous) Institutional Decision-Making: Implications for the Establishment of Responsibility’, International Organizations Law Review 11 (2014), 53–82.Google Scholar

Bekker, Pieter, The Legal Position of Intergovernmental Organizations: A Functional Necessity Analysis of Their Legal Status and Immunities (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1994).Google Scholar

Berger, Christian, ‘OSCE and International Law’, International Journal of Legal Information 24 (1996), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloed, Arie, ‘Two Decades of the CSCE Process: From Confrontation to Co-operation, An Introduction’, in Bloed, Arie (ed.), The Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe: Analysis and Basic Documents, 1972–1993 (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993), 1–117.Google Scholar

Blokker, Niels, ‘International Organizations and Their Members’, International Organizations Law Review 1 (2004), 139–61.Google Scholar

Blokker, Niels, ‘Member State Responsibility for Wrongdoings of International Organizations: Beacon of Hope or Delusion?’, International Organizations Law Review No. 2 (2015), 319–32.Google Scholar

Brölmann, Catherine, The Institutional Veil in Public International Law: International Organisations and the Law of Treaties (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar

David, Eric, Droit des organisations internationales (Brussel: Bruylant, 2016).Google Scholar

Dekker, Ige and Wessel, Ramses, ‘Identities of States in International Organizations’, International Organizations Law Review 12 (2015), 293–318.Google Scholar

Dekker, Ige and Wessel, Ramses, ‘Van CVSE naar OVSE. De sluipende institutionalisering en onvermijdelijke juridisering van een internationale conferentie’, Vrede en Veiligheid 4 (2002), 425–38.Google Scholar

Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘Personality of International Organizations’, in Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Åsa (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2011), 33–55.Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew, ‘International Organizations and the Frankenstein Problem’, European Journal of International Law 24 (2013), 999–1025.Google Scholar

Jackson, John, Restructuring the GATT System (London: The Royal Institute of International Studies, 1990).Google Scholar

Jakobson, Linda and Melvin, Neil (eds.), The New Arctic Governance, SIPRI Research Report No. 25 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Jenks, Clarence Wilfred, ‘The Legal Personality of International Organizations’, British Yearbook of International Law 22 (1945), 267–75.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, An Introduction to International Organizations Law 3rd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Presumptive Personality: The European Union in International Law’, in Koskenniemi, Martti (ed.), International law Aspects of the European Union (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998), 231–53.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘The Concept of Legal Personality’, Ius Gentium 11 (2005), 35–66.Google Scholar

Lagrange, Evelyn and Sorel, Jean-Marc, Droit des organisations internationales (Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 2013).Google Scholar

Odello, Marco, ‘The Developing Legal Status of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe’, Anuario de derecho internacional XXII (2006), 351–93.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses and Wouters, Jan, ‘When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking’, European Journal of International Law 25 (2014),733–63.Google Scholar

Rama-Montaldo, Manuel, ‘International Legal Personality and Implied Powers of International Organisations’, British Yearbook of International Law 44 (1970), 111–55.Google Scholar

Reinisch, August and Bachmayer, Peter (eds.), The Conventions on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations and the Specialized Agencies – A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Roessler, Frieder, ‘The Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization’, in Bourgeois, Jacques, Berrod, Frederique and Fournier, Eric Gippini (eds.), The Uruguay Round Results – A European Lawyers’ Perspective (Brussels: European Interuniversity Press, 1995), 67–85.Google Scholar

Ruffert, Matthias and Walter, Christian, Institutionalised International Law (Baden-Baden, Portland: Nomos and Hart Publishers, 2015).Google Scholar

Sands, Phillipe and Klein, Pierre, Bowett’s Law of International Institutions 6th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2009).Google Scholar

Schermers, Henry and Blokker, Niels, International Institutional Law 5th edn (Leiden: Brill, 2011).Google Scholar

Schlager, Erika, ‘The Procedural Framework of the CSCE: From Helsinki Consultations to the Paris Charter, 1972–1990’, Human Rights Law Journal 12 (1991), 221–37.Google Scholar

Seidl-Hohenveldern, Ignaz, ‘Internationale Organisationen aufgrund von soft law’, in Beyerlin, Ulrich et al. (eds.), Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung – Völkerrecht, Europarecht, Staatsrecht: Festschrift für Rudolf Bernhardt (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1995), 229–39.Google Scholar

Szafarz, Renata, ‘CSCE: An International Organization in Statu Nacsendi?’, in Bloed, Arie and de Jonge, Wilco (eds.), Legal Aspects of a New European Infrastructure (Utrecht: Europa Instituut: Nederlands Helsinki Comité, 1992), 15–21.Google Scholar

Takei, Yoshinobu, ‘Are the Polar Regions Converging? A Study of the Evolution of the International Regime Governing the Arctic Region Compared to the Antarctic Treaty System’, in Aznar, Mariano and Footer, Mary (eds.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, vol. 4 (Oxford: Hart Publishers, 2012), 363–78.Google Scholar

Takei, Yoshinobu, ‘The Role of the Arctic Council from an International Law Perspective: Past, Present and Future’, The Yearbook of Polar Law VI (2015), 349–74.Google Scholar

Tichy, Helmut and Quidenus, Catherine, ‘Consolidating the International Legal Personality of the OSCE: A Headquarters Agreement with Austria’, International Organisations Law Review 14 (2017).Google Scholar

Tichy, Helmut and Köhler, Ulrike, ‘Legal Personality or Not – The Recent Attempts to Improve the Status of the OSCE’, in Buffard, Isabelle, Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Wittich, Stefan (eds.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation. Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), 455–78.Google Scholar

Wessel, Ramses, ‘Institutional Law-Making: The Emergence of a Global Normative Web’, in Brölmann, Catherine and Radi, Yannick (eds.), Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Law-Making (Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016), 179–99.Google Scholar

Wessel, Ramses, ‘Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations’, in Ryngaert, Cedric, Dekker, Ige, Wessel, Ramses and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Judicial Decisions on the Law of International Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 11–18.Google Scholar

Wessel, Ramses, ‘Revisiting the International Legal Status of the EU’, European Foreign Affairs Review 5 (2000), 507–37.Google Scholar

Wessel, Ramses, ‘The European Union as a Party to International Agreements: Shared Competences, Mixed Responsibilities’, in Dashwood, Alan and Maresceau, Marc (eds.), Law and Practice of EU External Relations – Salient Features of a Changing Landscape (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 145–80.Google Scholar

Wessel, Ramses, ‘The International Legal Status of the European Union’, European Foreign Affairs Review 2 (1997), 109–29.Google Scholar

Wessel, Ramses and Arribas, Gloria Fernandez, ‘EU Agreements with Third Countries: Constitutional Reservations by Member States’, in Blockmans, Steven (ed.), The European Union and International Crisis Management: Legal and Policy Aspects (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2008), 291–308.Google Scholar

White, Nigel, The Law of International Organisations 2nd edn (Manchester:Manchester University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

White, Nigel and Collins, Richard (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order (Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group, 2011).Google Scholar

Wouters, Jan and Man, Philip De ‘International Organizations as Law-Makers’, in Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Åsa (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organization (Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2011), 190–225.Google Scholar

Barros, Ana Sofia and Ryngaert, Cedric, ‘Officials (Art. VI Sections 18–250, Specialized Agencies Convention)’, in Reinisch, August (ed.), The Conventions on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations and Its Specialized Agencies: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 395–436.Google Scholar

Debuf, Els, ‘Tools to do the Job: The ICRC’s Legal Status, Privileges and Immunities’, International Review of the Red Cross 97 (2016), 319–44.Google Scholar

Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2011).Google Scholar

Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘Personality of International Organizations’, in Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Asa (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organisations (Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing, 2011), 33–55.Google Scholar

Lefeber, René, ‘The Provisional Application of Treaties’, in Klabbers, Jan and Lefeber, René (eds.), Essays on the Law of Treaties: A Collection of Essays in Honour of Bert Vierdag (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998), 81–96.Google Scholar

Oberschmidt, Randolf and Wolfgang, Zellner, ‘OSCE at the Crossroads, Working Paper 2’, in WP Core Working Papers (Hamburg: Centre for OSCE Research, Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg 2000).Google Scholar

Reinisch, August, ‘Transnational Judicial Conversations on the Personality, Privileges, and Immunities of International Organisations: An Introduction’, in Reinisch, August (ed.), The Privileges and Immunities of International Organisations in Domestic Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 1–16.Google Scholar

Ryngaert, Cedric, ‘The Immunity of International Organisations Before Domestic Courts: Recent Trends’, International Organizations Law Review 7 (2010), 121–48.Google Scholar

Sapiro, Miriam, ‘Changing the CSCE into the OSCE: Legal Aspects of a Political Transformation’, The American Journal of International Law 89 (3) (1995), 631–7.Google Scholar

Wood, Michael, ‘Do International Organisations Enjoy Immunity Under Customary International Law?’, International Organizations Law Review 10 (2013), 287–318.Google Scholar

Bertrand, Christine, ‘La nature juridique de l’Organisation pour la sécurité et la coopération en Europe (OSCE)’, Revue générale de droit international public 102 (1998), 365–406.Google Scholar

Brander, Sonya, ‘Making a Credible Case for a Legal Personality for the OSCE’, OSCE Magazine (March–April 2009), 18–22.Google Scholar

Cadet, Hélène, ‘Le statut juridique de l’OSCE’, PhD thesis, Université Paris 1 (2012).Google Scholar

Cogen, Marc, An Introduction to European Intergovernmental Organizations (Farnham: Ashgate, 2015).Google Scholar

Dailler, Patrick, Forteau, Mathias and Pellet, Alain, Droit international public (Paris: L. G. D. J., 2009).Google Scholar

Decaux, Emmanuel, ‘La CSCE au lendemain du Conseil de Rome: un bilan de la transition institutionnelle’, European Journal of International Law 5 (1994), 267–84.Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie and Kerbrat, Yann, Droit international public 14th edn (Paris: Dalloz, 2018).Google Scholar

Gaillard, Emmanuel and Pingel, Isabelle, ‘International Organisations and Immunity from Jurisdiction: To Restrict or to Bypass’, International & Comparative Law Quarterly 51 (2002), 1–15.Google Scholar

Ghébali, Victor-Yves, L’OSCE dans l’Europe post-communiste 1990–1996 (Brussels: Bruylant, 1996).Google Scholar

Ghébali, Victor-Yves, Le rôle de l’OSCE en Eurasie, du sommet de Lisbonne au Conseil ministériel de Maastricht (1996–2003) (Brussels: Bruylant, 2014).Google Scholar

Jenks, Clarence, International Immunities (London: Stevens and Sons, 1961).Google Scholar

Manton, Eric, ‘The OSCE Human Dimension Process and the Process of Customary International Law Formation’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2005 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2006), 195–214.Google Scholar

Martha, Rutsel, Tax Treatment of International Civil Servants (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mérini, Corinne, ‘Le partenariat: Instrument juridique et/ou politique, le cas de l’OSCE’, Revue Québecoise De Droit international 9 (1995), 21–34.Google Scholar

Oberschmidt, Randolf and Wolfgang, Zellner, ‘OSCE at the Crossroads’, Working Paper 2, in WP Core Working Papers (Hamburg: Centre for OSCE Research, Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg 2000).Google Scholar

Pingel, Isabelle, Les immunités des Etats en droit international (Brussels: Bruylant, 1997).Google Scholar

Pingel, Isabelle, ‘Les privilèges et immunités de l’organisation internationale’, in Lagrange, Evelyne and Sorel, Jean-Marc (eds.), Droit des organisations internationales (Paris: L. G. D. J., 2013), 626–56.Google Scholar

Prévost, Jean-François, ‘Observations sur la nature juridique de l’Acte final de la Conférence sur la sécurité et la coopération en Europe’, Annuaire Français de Droit International 21 (1975), 129–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryngaert, Cedric, ‘Basing the Legal Status of the OSCE on Participating States’ Duty of Loyalty’, Völkerrechtsblog (3 August 2016), https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/basing-the-legal-status-of-the-osce-on-participating-states-duty-of-loyalty/.Google Scholar

Sapiro, Miriam ‘Changing the CSCE into the OSCE: Legal Aspects of a Political Transformation’, American Journal of International Law 89 (1995), 631–7.Google Scholar

Schmalenbach, Kirsten, ‘Austrian Courts and the Immunity of International Organizations’, International Organizations Law Review 10 (2013), 446–63.Google Scholar

Simonet, Loïc and Lüber, Hans Georg, ‘The OSCE and Its Legal Status: Revisiting the Myth of Sisyphus’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2016 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2017), 277–316.Google Scholar

Steinbrück Platise, Mateja, ‘The Development of the Immunities of International Organisations in Response to Domestic Contestations’, in Kanetake, Machiko and Nollkaemper, André (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels (Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar

Tabassi, Lisa, ‘The Question of Legal Status for the OSCE and Implications for Ukraine’, 27 April 2015, www.oscepa.org/documents/all-documents/helsinki-40/seminar-4-diis/2919-presentation-by-lisa-tabassi-for-helsinki-40-seminar-27-april-2015/file.Google Scholar

Tichy, Helmut and Köhler, Ulrike, ‘Legal Personality or Not – The Recent Attempts to Improve the Status of the OSCE’, in Buffard, Isabelle, Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008), 455–78.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, ‘International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century: General Course on Public International Law’, Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 281 (The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, 2013), 9–438.Google Scholar

Virally, Michel, ‘Le rôle des organisations internationales dans l’atténuation et le règlement des crises internationales’, Politique étrangère 6 (1976), 529–62.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, ‘Alternatives to Treaty-Making: MOUs as Political Commitments’, in Hollis, Duncan (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 46–72.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, ‘The Theory and Practice of Informal International Instruments’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 38 (1986), 787–812.Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, Interactions Between Regional and Universal Organizations: A Legal Perspective (Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2016).Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, ‘Relations with other International Organizations’, in Cogan, Jacob Katz, Hurd, Ian and Johnstone, Ian (eds.), Oxford Handbook on International Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 691–711.Google Scholar

Daillier, Patrick, ‘L’Intervention des organisations internationales dans les conflits armés. Sécurité “collective” et sécurité régionale’, in Benchikh, Madjid (ed.), Les Organisations internationales et les conflits armés (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2002).Google Scholar

De Pooter, Hélène, Le droit international face aux pandémies: vers un système de sécurité collective? (Paris: Pedone, 2015), 247–68.Google Scholar

Dupuy, René-Jean, ‘Le droit des relations entre les organisations internationales’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960) vol. 100, 457–589.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Jürgen, ‘UNMIK in Kosovo: Struggling with Uncertainty’, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 9 (2005), 225–93.Google Scholar

Gadkowski, Andrzej, Treaty-Making Powers of International Organizations (Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Gaja, Giorgio, ‘The Use of Force Made or Authorized by the United Nations’, in Tomuschat, Christian (ed.), United Nations at Age Fifty: A Legal Perspective (The Hague, Boston, London: Kluwer Law International, 1995).Google Scholar

Gray, Christine, International Law and the Use of Force 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Hoffmeister, Frank, ‘Inter-pillar Coherence in the European Union’s Civilian Crisis Management’, in Blockmans, Steven (ed.), The European Union and Crisis Management: Policy and Legal Aspects (The Hague: TMS Asser Press, 2008), 157–80.Google Scholar

Hofmann, Rainer, ‘International Protection of Human Rights and International Territorial Administration: A Legal Black Hole’, in Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, Gasser, Hans-Peter, Marauhn, Thilo and Ronzitti, Natalino (eds.), Frieden in Freiheit–Peace in Liberty–Paix en liberté: Festschrift für Michael Bothe zum 70. Geburtstag (Baden-Baden, Berlin: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2008), 123–41.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, The Concept of Treaty in International Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996).Google Scholar

Klein, Pierre, ‘Panels, médiateurs et mécanismes informels de contrôle des activités des organisations internationales: entre accountability et responsibility’, in Actes du colloque de la Société européenne de droit international (Cambridge) (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012), 217–28.Google Scholar

Kuijper, Pieter-Jan, ‘Superpower Frustrated? The Costs of Non-Lisbon in EU External Affairs’, German Yearbook of International Law 51 (2008), 9–37.Google Scholar

Pacquée, Didier and Dewulf, Stewen ‘International Territorial Administrations and the Rule of Law: The Case of Kosovo’, Essex Human Rights Review 4 (2007), 1–14.Google Scholar

Sicilianos, Linos-Alexandre, ‘Entre multilatéralisme et unilatéralisme: l’autorisation par le Conseil de sécurité de recourir à la force’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008) vol. 339 9–436.Google Scholar

Stribis, Ioannis, ‘La présidence ukrainienne de l’OSCE en 2013. Opportunités et défis’, Annuaire français de relations internationales 13 (2012), 141–57.Google Scholar

Trifunovska, Snežana, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 2nd edn (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2012).Google Scholar

Zwarenburg, Marten, ‘What’s in a Word? NATO “Partnerships” between NATO and Other International Institutions and Some Issues of Shared Responsibility’, International Organizations Law Review 13 (2016), 100–25.Google Scholar

Aaken, Anne van and Chambers, Richard, ‘Accountability and Independence of International Election Observers’, International Organizations Law Review 6 (2009), 541–80.Google Scholar

Abass, Ademola, Regional Organisations and the Development of Collective Security: Beyond Chapter VIII of the UN Charter (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2004).Google Scholar

Ahlborn, Christiane, ‘The Rules of International Organizations and the Law of International Responsibility’, International Organizations Law Review 8 (2011), 397–482.Google Scholar

Amerasinghe, Felix, Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Anzilotti, Dionisio, ‘Gli organi comuni alle società di stati’, Rivista di Diritto Internazionale (1914), 156–64.Google Scholar

Balladore Pallieri, Giorgio, ‘Le droit interne des organisations internationales’, Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye 127 (1969), 1–38.Google Scholar

Barberini, Giovanni, Sicurezza e cooperazione da Vancouver a Vladivostok (Torino: Giappichelli, 2004).Google Scholar

Bertrand, Christine, ‘La nature juridique de l’Organisation pour la sécurité et la coopération en Europe (OSCE)’, Revue Général de Droit International Public CII (1998), 365–406.Google Scholar

Arie, Bloed, ‘The CSCE Human Dimension Commitments: Present and Prospects’, in Emmanuel, Decaux and Linos-Alexandre, Sicilianos (eds.), La CSCE: dimension humaine et règlement des différends (Paris: Montchrestien, 1993), 43–61.Google Scholar

Bohannan, Paul, ‘The Differing Realms of the Law’, American Anthropologist 67 (1965), 33–42.Google Scholar

Brander, Sonya, ‘Making a Credible Case for a Legal Personality for the OSCE’, OSCE Magazine (2009), 18–23.Google Scholar

Brander, Sonya and María, Martín Estébanez, ‘The OSCE Matures: Time for Legal Status’, Helsinki Monitor: Security and Human Rights 18 (2007), 2–5.Google Scholar

Brölmann, Catherine, The Institutional Veil in Public International Law: International Organisations and the Law of Treaties (Oxford: Hart, 2007).Google Scholar

Brölmann, Catherine, ‘Member States and International Legal Responsibility: Developments of the Institutional Veil’, International Organizations Law Review 12 (2015), 358–81.Google Scholar

Brölmann, Catherine and Nijman, Janne Elisabeth, ‘Legal Personality as a Fundamental Concept of International Law’, in d’Aspremont, Jean and Singh, Sahib (eds.), Fundamental Concepts of International Law (London: Elgar, 2017).Google Scholar

Buergenthal, Thomas, ‘The CSCE Rights System’, George Washington Journal of International Law & Economics 25 (1991–1992), 333–86.Google Scholar

Cahier, Philippe, ‘L’ordre juridique interne des organisations internationales’, in Dupuy, René-Jean (ed.), Manuel sur les organisations internationales (Leiden: Brill, 1998), 377–96.Google Scholar

Condorelli, Luigi, ‘En attendant la “Cour de conciliation et d’arbitrage de la CSCE”: quelques remarques sur le droit applicable’, in Dominicé, Christian, Patry, Robert and Reymond, Claude (eds.), Études de droit international en l’honneur de Pierre Lalive (Bâle, Francfort-sur-le-Main: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1993), 457–67.Google Scholar

Decaux, Emmanuel, ‘L’institutionalisation de la CSCE’, in Emmanuel, Decaux and Linos-Alexandre, Sicilianos (eds.), La CSCE: dimension humaine et règlement des différends (Paris: Montchrestien, 1993), 125–59.Google Scholar

Decleva, Matteo, Il diritto interno delle unioni internazionali (Padova: CEDAM, 1962).Google Scholar

Dijk, Pieter van, ‘The Final Act of Helsinki – Basis for a Pan-European System?’ Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 11 (1980), 97–124.Google Scholar

Dijk, Pieter van, ‘The Implementation of the Final Act of Helsinki: The Creation of New Structures or the Involvement of Existing Ones?’, Michigan Journal of International Law 10 (1989), 110–26.Google Scholar

Dominguez, Roberto, The OSCE: Soft Security for a Hard World: Competing Theories for Understanding the OSCE (Brussels: P. I. E. Peter Lang, 2014).Google Scholar

Dominicé, Christian, ‘Attribution of Conduct to Multiple States and the Implication of a State in the Act of Another State’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 281–9.Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie and Viñuales, Jorge E., International Environmental Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo, The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community (Leiden, Boston: Nijhoff, 2009).Google Scholar

Ferrari-Bravo, Luigi, ‘Difficultés et perspectives de la nouvelle Europe’, in Emmanuel, Decaux and Linos-Alexandre, Sicilianos (eds.), La CSCE: dimension humaine et règlement des différends (Paris: Montchrestien, 1993), 15–27.Google Scholar

Focsanenau, Lazar, ‘Le droit interne de l’organisation des Nation Unies’, Annuaire français de droit international 3 (1957), 315–49.Google Scholar

Forteau, Mathias, ‘Régime général de responsabilité ou lex specialis?’, Revue belge de droit international 46 (2013), 147–61.Google Scholar

Gaja, Giorgio, ‘Note introductive de l’ancien rapporteur spécial’, Revue belge de droit international 46 (2013), 9–17.Google Scholar

Gheciu, Alexandra, Securing Civilization? The EU, NATO, and the OSCE in the Post-9/11 World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Heraclides, Alexis, ‘The diplomatic Process of Elaborating the CSCE Human Dimension Commitments: From Ideological Incompatibility to Community of Values’, in Emmanuel, Decaux and Linos-Alexandre, Sicilianos (eds.), La CSCE: dimension humaine et règlement des différends (Paris: Montchrestien, 1993), 27–43.Google Scholar

Hoffmeister, Frank, ‘Litigating Against the European Union and Its Member States – Who Responds Under the ILC’s Draft Articles on International Responsibility of International Organizations?’, European Journal of International Law 21 (2010), 723–47.Google Scholar

Jacobi, Susanne, ‘The OSCE Court: An Overview’, Leiden Journal of International Law 10 (1997), 281–94.Google Scholar

Kerchove, Michel van de and Ost, François, Legal System Between Order and Disorder (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Kerchove, Michel van de and Ost, François, De la pyramide au réseau?: Pour une théorie dialectique du droit (Brussels: FUSL, 2002).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, An Introduction to International Organizations Law 3rd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Klein, Pierre, La responsabilité des organisations internationales dans les ordres juridiques internes et en droit des gens (Brussels: Bruylant, 1998).Google Scholar

Ličková, Magdalena, ‘European Exceptionalism in International Law’, European Journal of International Law 19 (2008), 463–90.Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric, ‘La responsabilité des Nations unies aux temps du choléra’, Revue belge de droit international 46 (2013), 161–90.Google Scholar

Monaco, Riccardo, ‘I regolamenti interni degli enti internazionali’, Jus Gentium, Annuario italiano di diritto internazionale I (1938), 52–108.Google Scholar

Morgenstern, Felice, ‘The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties Between States and International Organisations or between International Organisations’, in Dinstein, Yoram (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Dordrecht, Boston: Brill, 1989), 435–47.Google Scholar

Muchlinski, Peter, Multinational Enterprises and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André and Plakokefalos, Ilias, Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law: An Appraisal of the State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Oberschmidt, Randolf and Zellner, Wolfgang, ‘OSCE at the Crossroads’, Centre for OSCE Research: Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg, CORE Working Paper 2 (2001).Google Scholar

Pellet, Alain, ‘Les fondements juridiques internationaux du droit communautaire’, Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law (1997), 193–271.Google Scholar

Prevost, Jean-François, ‘Observations sur la nature juridique de l’Acte final de la Conférence sur la sécurité et la coopération en Europe’, Annuaire français de droit international 21 (1975), 129–53.Google Scholar

Robé, Jean-Philippe, ‘Multinational Enterprises: The Constitution of a Pluralistic Legal Order’, in Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Global Law Without a State (Farnham: Ashgate, 1997), 45–78.Google Scholar

Robilant, Anna di, ‘Genealogy of Soft Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 54 (2006), 499–554.Google Scholar

Romano, Santi, L’ordinamento giuridico (Pisa: Spoerri, 1918).Google Scholar

Roucounas, Emmanuel, ‘Remarques sur la portée juridique des engagements CSCE concernant la dimension humaine’, in Emmanuel, Decaux and Linos-Alexandre, Sicilianos (eds.), La CSCE: dimension humaine et règlement des différends (Paris: Montchrestien, 1993), 89–115.Google Scholar

Sapiro, Miriam, ‘Changing the CSCE into the OSCE: Legal Aspects of a Political Transformation’, American Journal of International Law 89 (1995), 631–7.Google Scholar

Schermers, Henry and Blokker, Niels, International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity (Boston, Leiden: Nijhoff, 2011).Google Scholar

Schultz, Thomas, Transnational Legality: Stateless Law and International Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Sereni, Angelo Piero, Le organizzazioni internazionali (Milano: Giuffré, 1959).Google Scholar

Seyersted, Finn, ‘International Personality of Intergovernmental Organizations’, Indian Journal of International Law 4 (1964), 1–75.Google Scholar

Seyersted, Finn, ‘Objective International Personality of Intergovernmental Organizations: Do Their Capacities Really Depend Upon the Conventions Establishing Them’, Nordisk Tidsskrift International Ret 34 (1964), 1–112.Google Scholar

Stefanova, Boyka, ‘Institutionalist Theories. The OSCE in the Western Balkans’, in Dominguez, Roberto, The OSCE: Soft Security for a Hard World: Competing Theories for Understanding the OSCE (Brussels: P. I. E. Peter Lang, 2014), chapter 3.Google Scholar

Stern, Brigitte, ‘The Elements of an Internationally Wrongful Act’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 193–221.Google Scholar

Tichy, Helmut and Köhler, Ulrike ‘Legal Personality or Not – The Recent Attempts to Improve the Status of the OSCE’, in Buffard, Isabelle, Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Law Between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2008), 455–78.Google Scholar

Virally, Michel, L’organisation mondiale (Paris: Armand Colin, 1972).Google Scholar

White, Nigel, The Law of International Organisations (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Wouters, Jan and Odermatt, Jed, ‘Are All International Organizations Created Equal?’, International Organizations Law Review 9 (2012), 7–14.Google Scholar

Zagorski, Andrei, ‘Make the OSCE Institutions Less Dependent on Politics, Not More’, Helsinki Monitor 209 (2005).Google Scholar