Abbott, Kenneth W. and Duncan, Snidal, ‘Why States Act through Formal International Organizations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1998), 3–32.Google Scholar

Alebeek, Rosanne van, ‘Stitching Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v Netherlands and United Nations, Final appeal judgment, LJN: BW1999, ILDC 1760 (NL 2012), 13th April 2012, Netherlands; Supreme Court [HR]’, Oxford Reports on International Law in Domestic Courts (2012).Google Scholar

Barros, Ana Sofia, Ryngaert, Cedric and Wouters, Jan, International Organizations and Member State Responsibility: Critical Perspectives (Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff Publishers, 2015).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, The Law of Global Governance (The Hague: The Hague Academy of International Law, 2014).Google Scholar

Bernhardt, Rudolf, ‘International Organisations, Internal Law and Rules’, in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. II (Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 1995), 1314–18.Google Scholar

Bertrand, Christine, ‘La nature juridique de l’Organisation pour la Sécurité et la Coopération en Europe (OSCE)’, Revue Générale de Droit International Public 98 (1998), 365–406.Google Scholar

Blokker, Niels, ‘Constituent Instruments’, in Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Asa (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), 943–61.Google Scholar

Bogdandy, Armin von, Dann, Philipp and Goldmann, Matthias, ‘Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities’, German Law Journal 9 (2008), 1376–1400.Google Scholar

Boutin, Bérénice, ‘Netherlands (Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Foreign Affairs) v Nuhanović, Final appeal judgment, ECLI/NL/HR/2013/BZ9225, ILDC 2061 (NL 2013), 12/03324, 6th September 2013, Netherlands; Supreme Court [HR]’, Oxford Reports on International Law in Domestic Courts (2013).Google Scholar

Braun, Dietmar, ‘Dezentraler und unitarischer Föderalismus. Die Schweiz und Deutschland im Vergleich’, Swiss Political Science Review 9 (2003), 57–89.Google Scholar

Brölmann, Catherine, The Institutional Veil in Public International Law: International Organisations and the Law of Treaties (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar

Burri, Thomas, ‘Secession in the CIS: Causes, Consequences and Emerging Principles’, in Walter, Christian, von Ungern-Sternberg, Antje and Abushov, Kavus (eds.), Self-determination and Secession in International Law, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 138–56.Google Scholar

Cappelletti, Mauro, The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Clinton, Robert N., ‘Isolated in Their Own Country: A Defence of Federal Protection of Indian Autonomy and Self-Government’, Stanford Law Review 33 (6) (1981), 979–1068.Google Scholar

Cogen, Marc, An Introduction to European Intergovernmental Organisations (London, New York: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Cooper, Scott, Hawkins, Darren, Jacoby, Wade and Nielson, Daniel, ‘Yielding Sovereignty to International Institutions: Bringing System Structure Back In’, International Studies Review 10 (2008), 501–24.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law 8th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

D’Aspremont, Jean, ‘Abuse of the Legal Personality of International Organisations and the Responsibility of Member States’, International Organizations Law Review 4 (2007), 91–119.Google Scholar

Daugirdas, Kristina, ‘How and Why International Law Binds International Organizations’, Harvard International Law Journal 57 (2016), 325–81.Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne, ‘The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi’, Harvard International Law Journal 51 (2010), 1–49.Google Scholar

de Wet, Erika, ‘From Kadi to Nada: Judicial Techniques Favouring Human Rights over United Nations Security Council Sanctions’, Chinese Journal of International Law 12 (2013), 787–807.Google Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo, ‘Triepel in Luxemburg. Die dualistische Sicht des Verhältnisses zwischen Europa- und Völkerrecht in der “Kadi-Rechtsprechung” des EuGH als Problem des Selbstverständnisses der Europäischen Union’, Die öffentliche Verwaltung 63 (2010), 333–41.Google Scholar

Foldvary, Fred E., ‘Political Autonomy’, in Chatterjee, Deen K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Justice (Berlin: Springer, 2011), 853–4.Google Scholar

Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘Legal Personality of International Organizations’, in Klabbers, Jan (ed.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), 33–55.Google Scholar

Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘The Relationship Between International Legal Personality and the Autonomy of International Organisations’, in White, Nigel D. and Collins, Richard (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy, Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order (Routledge, 2011), 196–212.Google Scholar

Genser, Jared and Kate, Barth, ‘Targeted Sanctions and Due Process of Law’, in Genser, Jared and Ugarte, Bruno Stagno (eds.), The United Nations Security Council in the Age of Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 195–246.Google Scholar

Giegerich, Thomas, ‘Verantwortlichkeit und Haftung für Akte internationaler und supranationaler Organisationen’, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtwissenschaft 104 (2005), 163–91.Google Scholar

Grote, Jürgen R. and Gbikpi, Bernard (eds.), Participatory Governance: Political and Societal Implications (Berlin: Springer, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Polity Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Halberstam, Daniel, ‘It’s the Autonomy, Stupid! A Modest Defence of Opinion 2/13 on EU Accession to the ECHR, and the Way Forward’, German Law Journal 16 (2015), 105–46.Google Scholar

Hannum, Hurst and Lillich, Richard B., ‘The Concept of Autonomy in International Law’, The American Journal of International Law 74 (1980), 858–89.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael J., ‘Delegation Under Anarchy: States, International Organizations and Principal Agent Theory’, in Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael J. (eds.), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘The Legal Consequences for Member States of the Non-fulfilment by International Organisations of their Obligations toward Third Parties’, Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 66-I (1995), 375–420.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems & Processes: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Huber, John D. and Shipan, Charles R., Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Jensen, Laura S., ‘Federal Authority vs. State Autonomy: The Supreme Court’s Role Revisited’, Public Administration Review 59-II (1999), 97–9.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Steward, Richard B., ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (2005), 15–61.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Institutional Ambivalence by Design: Soft Organizations in International Law’, Nordic Journal of International Law 70 (2001), 403–21.Google Scholar

Klein, Pierre, ‘International Organizations or Institutions, Decision-Making Process’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. V (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 403–21.Google Scholar

Kokott, Juliane and Sobotta, Christoph, ‘The Kadi Case – Constitutional Core Values and International Law – Finding the Balance?’, The European Journal of International Law 23 (2012), 1015–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lagrange, Evelyne, La représentation institutionnelle dans l’ordre international: Une contribution à la théorie de la personnalité morale des organisations internationales (The Hague: Kluwer, 2002).Google Scholar

Hartwig, Matthias, Die Haftung der Mitgliedstaaten für internationale Organisationen (Berlin, New York, London: Springer, 1993).Google Scholar

Nedeski, Nataša and Nollkaemper, André, ‘Responsibility of International Organizations in Connection with Acts of States’, International Organizations Law Review 9 (2012), 33–52.Google Scholar

Niedobitek, Matthias, ‘OSCE and Kosovo’, in Hilpold, Peter (ed.), Kosovo and International Law: The ICJ Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010 (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012), 139–56.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Ramses, Wessel A. and Jan, Wouters, ‘When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking’, European Journal of International Law 25 (2014), 733–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pellet, Allain, ‘L’imputabilité d’éventuels actes illicites: Responsabilité de l’OTAN ou des Etats membres’, in Tomuschat, Christian (ed.), Kosovo and the International Community: A Legal Assessment (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002), 193–202.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, ‘Membership in the Global Constitutional Community’, in Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir, The Constitutionalization of International Law 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 153–262.Google Scholar

Phan, Hao Duy, ‘The Association of Southeast Asian Nations: International Legal Personality and its Treaty-Making Power’, International Organizations Law Review 13 (2016), 273–307.Google Scholar

Reinalda, Bob and Verbeek, Bertjan (eds.), Autonomous Policy-Making by International Organisations (London; New York: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar

August, Reinisch (ed.), International Organisations before National Courts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

August, Reinisch (ed.), The Privileges and Immunities of International Organisations in Domestic Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

August, Reinisch, ‘Privileges and Immunities’, in Katz Cogan, Jacob, Hurd, Ian and Johnstone, Ian (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 1048–68.Google Scholar

Rittberger, Volker, Zangl, Bernhard and Staisch, Matthias, International Organization Polity, Politics and Policies (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar

Sarooshi, Dan, International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Schermers, Henry G. and Blokker, Niels M., International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity 5th edn (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011).Google Scholar

Schmalenbach, Kirsten, ‘International Organizations or Institutions: General Aspects’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 1126–53.Google Scholar

Seidl-Hohenveldern, Ignaz, ‘Liability of Member States for Acts or Omissions of an International Organization’, in Schlemmer-Schulte, Sabine and Tung, Ko-Yung (eds.), Liber Amicorum Ibrahim F. I. Shihata: International Finance & Development Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), 727–39.Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno and Pulkowski, Dirk, ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’, The European Journal of International Law 17 (2006), 483–529.Google Scholar

Steinbrück Platise, Mateja, ‘The Development of the Immunities of International Organizations in Response to Domestic Contestations’, in Kanetake, Machiko and Nollkaemper, André (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference, Studies in International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016), 67–97.Google Scholar

Stumer, Andrew, ‘Liability of Member States for Acts of International Organizations: Reconsidering the Policy Objections’, Harvard International Law Journal 48 (2007), 553–80.Google Scholar

Suksi, Markku, ‘Autonomy’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. I (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 754–68.Google Scholar

Summers, James, ‘Kosovo’, in Christian, Walter, Antje, von Ungern-Sternberg and Kavus, Abushov (eds.), Self-Determination and Secession in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 235–54.Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo, ‘International Bureaucracies from a Political Science Perspective – Agency, Authority and International Institutional Law’, German Law Journal 9 (2008), 1401–28.Google Scholar

Vidal, Maarten, ‘Siedler v. Western European Union, Appeal Judgment, JT 2004, 617, ILDC 53 (BE 2003), 17th September 2003, Belgium; Brussels; Labour Court of Appeal; 4th Chamber’, Oxford Reports on International Law in Domestic Courts (2006).Google Scholar

Walter, Christian, ‘Subjects of International Law’, in Rüdiger, Wolfrum (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. IX (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 634–43.Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H. H. and Haltern, Ulrich ‘The Autonomy of the Community Legal Order - Through the Looking Glass’, Harvard International Law Journal 37 (1996), 411–48.Google Scholar

Wellens, Karel, Remedies against International Organisations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Wenig, Marcus, ‘Der völkerrechtliche Status der OSZE – Gegenwärtiger Stand und Perspektiven’, OSZE-Jahrbuch 3 (1997), 393–411.Google Scholar

Wessel, Ramses A. and Blockmans, Steven, ‘Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order Under the Influence of International Organisations – An Introduction’, in Wessel, Ramses A. and Blockmans, Steven (eds.), Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order Under the Influence of International Organisations (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press; Springer, 2013), 1–9.Google Scholar

Wessel, Ramses A., ‘Revisiting the International Legal Status of the EU’, European Foreign Affairs Review 5 (2000), 507–37.Google Scholar

White, Nigel, The Law of International Organisations (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Wouters, Jan, Brems, Eva, Smis, Stefaan and Schmitt, Pierre (eds.), Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organisations (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010).Google Scholar

Young, Ernest A., ‘Protecting Member State Autonomy in the European Union: Some Cautionary Tales from American Federalism’, New York University Law Review 77 (2002), 1612–737.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, Nollkaemper, André and Peerenboom, Randy, Rule of Law Dynamics: In an Era of International and Transnational Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar