Book contents
- Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems
- Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Classification of Written Languages
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Learning to Read Chinese
- 3 Learning to Read Japanese
- 4 Learning to Read Korean
- 5 Learning to Read Kannada and Other Languages of South Asia
- 6 Learning to Read Arabic
- 7 Learning to Read Hebrew
- 8 Learning to Read Greek
- 9 Learning to Read Italian
- 10 Learning to Read French
- 11 Learning to Read Spanish
- 12 Learning to Read German
- 13 Learning to Read Dutch
- 14 Learning to Read English
- 15 Learning to Read Czech and Slovak
- 16 Learning to Read Russian
- 17 Learning to Read Finnish
- 18 Learning to Read Turkish
- 19 Epilogue: Universals and Particulars in Learning to Read across Seventeen Orthographies
- Appendix
- Index
- References
13 - Learning to Read Dutch
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 October 2017
Book contents
- Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems
- Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Classification of Written Languages
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Learning to Read Chinese
- 3 Learning to Read Japanese
- 4 Learning to Read Korean
- 5 Learning to Read Kannada and Other Languages of South Asia
- 6 Learning to Read Arabic
- 7 Learning to Read Hebrew
- 8 Learning to Read Greek
- 9 Learning to Read Italian
- 10 Learning to Read French
- 11 Learning to Read Spanish
- 12 Learning to Read German
- 13 Learning to Read Dutch
- 14 Learning to Read English
- 15 Learning to Read Czech and Slovak
- 16 Learning to Read Russian
- 17 Learning to Read Finnish
- 18 Learning to Read Turkish
- 19 Epilogue: Universals and Particulars in Learning to Read across Seventeen Orthographies
- Appendix
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems , pp. 299 - 322Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical data base on CD-ROM. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Blau, V., Reithler, J., van Atteveldt, N. M., Seitz, J. M., Gerretsen, P., Goebel, R. W. & Blomert, L. P. M. (2010). Deviant processing of letters and speech sounds as proximate cause of reading failure: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of dyslexic children. Brain, 133(3), 868–879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blomert, L. (2011). The neural signature of orthographic-phonological binding in successful and failing reading development. Neuroimage, 57(3), 695–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blomert, L. & Willems, G. (2010). Is there a causal link from a phonological awareness deficit to reading failure in children at familial risk for dyslexia. Dyslexia, 16(4), 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomert, L. P. M. & Froyen, D. J. W. (2010). Multi-sensory learning and learning to read. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 77(3), 195–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonte, M. & Blomert, L. (2004). Developmental changes in ERP correlates of spoken word recognition during early school years: A phonological priming study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115(2), 409–423.Google Scholar
Booij, G. (1977). Dutch morphology: A study of word formation in generative grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosman, A. M. T. (1994). Reading and spelling in children and adults: Evidence for a single-route model. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bosman, A. M. T., de Graaff, S. & Gijsel, M. A. R. (2006). Double Dutch: The Dutch spelling system and learning to spell in Dutch. In Joshi, R. M. & Aron, P. G. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 135–150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bosman, A.M.T., van Hell, J. & Verhoeven, L. (2006). Learning the spelling of strange words in Dutch benefits from regularized reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 879–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosman, A. M. T., Vonk, W. & van Zwam, M. (2006). Spelling consistency affects reading in students with and without dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 271–300.Google Scholar
Cordewener, K. (2014). Variation in spelling ability in children: Acquisition and intervention. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
de Bree, E. H., Wijnen, F. N. K. & Gerrits, P. A. M. (2010). Non-word repetition and literacy in Dutch children at-risk of dyslexia and children with SLI: Results of the follow-up study. Dyslexia, 16, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Graaff, S., Bosman, A., Hasselman, F. & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Benefits of systematic phonics instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 318–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Graaff, S., Hasselman, F., Bosman, A. & Verhoeven, L. (2008). Cognitive and linguistic constraints on phoneme isolation in Dutch kindergartners. Learning & Instruction, 18, 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Graaff, S., Hasselman, F., Verhoeven, L. & Bosman, A. (2011). Phonemic awareness in Dutch kindergartners: Effects of task, phoneme position and phoneme class. Learning & Instruction, 21, 1634–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Graaff, S., Verhoeven, L., Bosman, A. & Hasselman, F. (2007). Using integrated pictorial mnemonics and stimulus fading: Teaching kindergartners letter sounds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 519–539.Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F. & Messbauer, V. C. S. (2011). Orthographic context and the acquisition of orthographic knowledge in normal and dyslexic readers. Dyslexia, 17, 107–122.Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F. & Olson, R. K. (2004). Early predictors of letter knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 254–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, P. F. & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F. & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 22–40.Google Scholar
deVries, M. & Winkel, L. A. (1866). Woordenlijst voor de spelling der Nederlandse taal met aanwijzing van de geslachten der naamwoorden en de vervoeging der werkwoorden.’s Gravenhage-Leiden-Arnhem: Thieme.Google Scholar
de Zeeuw, M., Schreuder, R. & Verhoeven, L. (2013). Processing of regular and irregular past-tense verb forms in first and second language reading acquisition. Language Learning, 63, 740–765.Google Scholar
Droop, M., van Elsacker, W., Voeten, M. & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Long-term effects of strategic reading instruction in the intermediate primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(1), 77–102.Google Scholar
Droop, M. & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading comprehension in first and second language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 78–103.Google Scholar
Eleveld, M. (2005). At risk for dyslexia. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Geerts, G., Haeseryn, W., de Rooij, J. & van den Toorn, M. C. (1984). Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Geudens, A. & Sandra, D. (2003). Beyond implicit phonological knowledge: No support for an onset-rime structure in children’s explicit phonological awareness. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 157–182.Google Scholar
Geudens, A., Sandra, D. & Van den Broeck, W. (2004). Segmenting two-phoneme syllables: Developmental differences in relation with early reading skills. Brain and Language, 90, 338–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gijsel, M. A. R., Bosman, A. M. T. & Verhoeven, L. (2006). Kindergarten risk factors, cognitive factors, and teacher judgments as predictors of early reading in Dutch. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 558–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilte, M. & Reitsma, P. (2006). Spelling pronunciation and visual preview both facilitate learning to spell irregular word. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 301–318.Google Scholar
Hilte, M. & Reitsma, P. (2011). Effects of explicit rules in learning to spell open- and closed-syllable words. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, W. A. & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, M. J., Verhoeven, L. & Bosman, A. M. T. (2012). Implicit and explicit instruction of spelling rules. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keuning, J. & Verhoeven, L. (2007). Screening for word reading and spelling problems in elementary school: An item response theory approach. Education and Child Psychology, 24, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keuning, J. & Verhoeven, L. (2008). Spelling development throughout the elementary grades: The Dutch case. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 459–470.Google Scholar
Kooij, J. G. (1992). Dutch. In Comrie, B. (Ed.), The major languages of Western Europe (pp. 129–146). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marinus, E. & de Jong, P. F. (2011). Dyslexic and typical-reading children use vowel digraphs as perceptual units in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 504–516.Google Scholar
Marinus, E. & de Jong, P. F. (2008). The use of sublexical clusters in normal reading and dyslexic readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(3), 253–280.Google Scholar
Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G. & de Jong, M. T. (2009). Interactive book reading in early education: A tool to stimulate print knowledge as well as oral language. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 979–1007.Google Scholar
Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, P. C. J., Serniclaes, W., Mitterer, H. A. & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2012). Allophonic mode of speech perception in Dutch children at risk for dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(5), 1469–1483.Google Scholar
Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, P. C. J., Wagensveld, B. & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2013). Aberrant N400 responses to phonological overlap during rhyme judgements in children at risk for dyslexia. Brain Research, 1537, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, T. K., Snowling, M. J. & de Jong, P. F. (2004). A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 785–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In Gorfien, D. (Ed.), On the onsequences of meaning selection (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Rispens, J. E., McBride-Chang, C. & Reitsma, P. (2008). Morphological awareness and early and advanced word recognition and spelling in Dutch: A Cross-sectional study. Reading and Writing, 21, 587–607.Google Scholar
Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In Feldman, L. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp.131–154). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schreuder, R. & van Bon, W. H. J. (1989). Phonemic analysis: Effects of word properties. Journal of Research in Reading, 12, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. & McClelland, J. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Bos, K. P. (2008). Word-reading development, the double-deficit hypothesis, and the diagnosis of dyslexia. Educational and Child Psychology, 25, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Bos, K. P., Zijlstra, B. J. H. & lutje Spelberg, H. C. (2002). Life-span data on continuous-naming speeds of numbers, letters, colors, and pictured objects, and word-reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Bos, K. P., Zijlstra, B. J. H. & Van den Broeck, W. (2003). Specific relations between alphanumeric-naming speed and reading speeds of monosyllabic and multisyllabic words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 407–430.Google Scholar
Van den Broeck, W. & Geudens, A. (2012). Old and new ways to study characteristics of reading disabilty: The case of the nonword-reading deficit. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 414–456.Google Scholar
Van den Broeck, W., Geudens, A. & van den Bos, K. P. (2010). The nonword-reading deficit of disabled readers: A developmental interpretation. Developmental Psychology, 46, 717–734.Google Scholar
van der Putten, F. (1997). Matter and mind in morphology: Syntactic and lexical deverbal morphology in Dutch. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
van Leerdam, M., Bosman, A. M. T. & van Orden, G. C. (1998). The ecology of spelling instruction: Effective training in first grade. In Reitsma, P. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Problems and interventions in literacy development (pp. 307–320). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. T. W. & Schreuder, R. (2011). Morpheme frequency effects in Dutch complex word reading: A developmental perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(3), 483–498.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R. & Baayen, H. (2006). Learnability of graphotactic rules in visual word identification. Learning and Instruction, 16, 538–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R. & Haarman, V. (2006). Prefix identification in the reading of Dutch bisyllabic words. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 651–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L. & van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Predictors of text comprehension development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 407–423.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. & van Leeuwe, J. (2009). Modeling the growth of word decoding skills: Evidence from Dutch. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 205–223.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. & van Leeuwe, J. (2011). Role of gender and linguistic diversity in word decoding development. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 359–367.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. & van Leeuwe, J. (2012). The simple view of second language reading throughout the primary grades. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1805–1818.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J. & Vermeer, A. (2011). Vocabulary growth and reading development across the elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 8–25.Google Scholar
Vloedgraven, J. M. T. & Verhoeven, L. (2007). Screening of phonological awareness in the early elementary grades: An IRT approach. Annals of Dyslexia, 57, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vloedgraven, J. M. T. & Verhoeven, L. (2009). The nature of phonological awareness throughout the elementary grades: An item response theory perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 161–169.Google Scholar
Wagensveld, B., Segers, E., van Alphen, P. & Verhoeven, L. (2012). A neurocognitive perspective on rhyme awareness: The N450 rhyme effect. Brain Research, 1483, 63–70.Google Scholar
Wagensveld, B., Segers, E., van Alphen, P. & Verhoeven, L. (2013). The role of lexical representations and phonological overlap in rhyme judgments of beginning, intermediate and advanced readers. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 64–71.Google Scholar
Wagensveld, B., van Alphen, P. M., Segers, P. C. J., Hagoort, P. & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2013). The neural correlates of rhyme awareness in preliterate and literate children. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124(7), 1336–1345.Google Scholar
Wagensveld, B., van Alphen, P. M., Segers, P. C. J. & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2012). The nature of rhyme processing in preliterate children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 672–689.Google Scholar
Wexler, K., Schaeffer, J. & Bol, G. (2004). Verbal syntax and morphology in Dutch normal and SLI children: How developmental data can play an important role in morphological theory. Syntax, 7, 148–198.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by