Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:16:32.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Bottom-up environmental law and democracy in the risk society: Portuguese experiences in the European context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

João Arriscado Nunes
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Sociology School of Economics University of Coimbra Portugal
Marisa Matias
Affiliation:
Sociologist and a Researcher University of Coimbra Portugal
Susana Costa
Affiliation:
Sociologist and a Researcher University of Coimbra Portugal
Boaventura de Sousa Santos
Affiliation:
Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
César A. Rodríguez-Garavito
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The problems faced by so-called “risk societies” (Beck 1992), including environmental problems, are best understood within the context of what Santos (2002:72–75) has called the collapse or crisis of the model of “normal” social change and, in particular, the crisis of the strategies of hegemony and trust used by the state and based on two key institutions, law and science. Responses to this crisis have bred some innovative experiences in citizen action and democratic participation.

This chapter takes up these issues through the presentation and discussion of struggles over environmental law and policies in Portugal, a semiperipheral country within a core regional space of the world-system, the European Union. Our aim is threefold: to describe and discuss the interplay of the national and the European and global scales in the making of domestic environmental regulation and legality; to characterize the tensions and conflicts arising in the attempts to enact environmental policies invoking state legality in local settings; and, finally, to examine the emergence and the dynamics of collective actors in their struggles over the environment, as they articulate scales and modes of intervention and of legality while opposing national environmental policies and hegemonic appropriations of European and international environmental regulations. A case of conflict over waste disposal and management will be examined in detail. The final section discusses the case in the light of the set of issues raised by Santos (2002) on the conditions for counter-hegemonic appropriations of law.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law and Globalization from Below
Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality
, pp. 363 - 383
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, Andrew. 2001. Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buttel, Frederick H., and Taylor, Peter J.. 1992. “Environmental Sociology and Global Environmental Change: A Critical Assessment.” Society and Natural Resources 5:211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, Michel, Lascoumes, Pierre, and Barthe, Yannick. 2001. Agir dans un monde incertain: essai sur la démocratie technique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo. 2000. “El lugar de la naturaleza y la naturaleza del lugar: globalización o postdesarrollo?” Pp. 113–143 in La Colonialidad del Saber: Eurocentrismo y Ciencias Sociales. Perspectivas Latinoamericanas, edited by Lander, Edgardo. Buenos Aires: CLACSO/UNESCO.Google Scholar
Fischer, Frank. 2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, Maria Eduarda. 2001. “Europeização e direitos dos cidadãos.” Pp. 339–366 in Globalização: Fatalidade ou Utopia?, edited by Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Porto: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Robert. 2001. Environmentalism Unbound: Exploring New Pathways to Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hajer, Maarten. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hofrichter, Richard (Ed.). 2000. Reclaiming the Environmental Debate: The Politics of Health in a Toxic Culture. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Alan. 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irwin, Alan, and Michael, Mike. 2003. Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Jamison, Andrew (Ed.). 1998. Technology Policy Meets the Public. PESTO Papers 2. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.Google Scholar
Jamison, Andrew 2001. The Making of Green Knowledge: Environmental Politics and Cultural Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamison, Andrew, and Rohracher, Harald (Eds.). 2002. Technology Studies and Sustainable Development. Munich: PROFIL.Google Scholar
Kenny, Michael, and Meadowcroft, James (Eds.). 1999. Planning Sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kroll-Smith, Steve, Brown, Phil, and Gunter, Valerie J. (Eds.). 2000. Illness and the Environment: A Reader in Contested Medicine. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Martinez-Alier, Juan, and Guha, Ramachandra. 1997. Varieties of Environmentalism: Essays North and South. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Matias, Marisa. 2002. Conhecimento(s), ambiente e participação: A contestação à co-incineradora em Souselas. Coimbra: Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra.Google Scholar
McAdam, Douglas, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles., 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCally, Michael (Ed.). 2002. Life Support: The Environment and Human Health. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Nunes, João Arriscado, and Marisa Matias. 2003. “Agonistic Spaces, Contentious Politics and the Trials of Governance: Environmental Policies and Conflict in Portugal.” Discussion Paper, Science, Technology and Governance in Europe Network.
Nunes, João Arriscado, Jorge Correia Jesuíno, Carmen Diego, Sandra Carvalho, Susana Costa, and Marisa Matias. 2002. “Portuguese National Profile.” Discussion Paper, Analysing Public Accountability Procedures in Contemporary European Contexts Project.
Nunes, João Arriscado, Marisa Matias, and Susana Costa. 2003. “Household Waste Management and Public Accountability in Portugal: The Case of the Taveiro Landfill.” Discussion Paper, Analysing Public Accountability Procedures in Contemporary European Contexts Project.
Peet, Richard, and Watts, Michael, (Eds.). 1996. Liberation Ecologies. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redclift, Michael. 1999. “Pathways to Sustainability: Issues, Policies and Theories.” Pp. 66–77 in Planning Sustainability, edited by Kenny, Michael and Meadowcroft, James. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Redclift, Michael 1987. Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Maria Eugénia. 1995. Os novos movimentos sociais. Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Sociais.Google Scholar
Sachs, Wolfgang. 1999. “Sustainable Development and the Crisis of Nature: On the Political Anatomy of an Oxymoron.” Pp. 23–41 in Living with Nature: Environmental Politics as Cultural Discourse, edited by Fischer, Frank and Hajer, Maarten. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1990. O Estado e a Sociedade em Portugal (1974–1988). Porto: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1993. “O Estado, as relações salariais e o bem-estar na semiperiferia: O caso português.” Pp. 15–56 in Portugal: Um retrato singular, edited by Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Porto: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Taylor, Peter. 1997. “How Do We Know We Have Global Environmental Problems? Undifferentiated Science – Politics and Its Potential Reconstruction.” Pp. 149–174 in Changing Life: Genomes, Ecologies, Bodies, Commodities, edited by Taylor, Peter J., Halfon, Saul E., and Edwards, Paul N.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Peter. 2001. “Distributed Agency Within Intersecting Ecological, Social, and Scientific Processes.” pp. 313–332 in Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, edited by Oyama, S., Griffiths, P., and Gray, R.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Peter. 2003. “A Reconstrução da Complexidade Ecológica Sem Regras: Ciência, Interpretação e Prática Reflexiva Crítica.” Pp. 529–551 in Conhecimento Prudente para uma Vida Decente: ‘Um Discurso Sobre as Ciências’ Revisitado, edited by Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Porto: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Thornton, Joe. 2000. Pandora's Poison: Chlorine, Health, and a New Environmental Strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×