Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:20:54.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - ‘Non-standard’ English and Education

from Part V - Applied Sociolinguistic Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2024

By
Julia Snell
Edited by
Susan Fox
Susan Fox
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

This chapter reviews the long-standing debate on ‘standard’ and ‘non-standard English’ in education, highlighting differences in approach not just between policymakers and professional linguists but also within the academic community. It introduces a language ideological framework that treats ‘standard’ and ‘non-standard’ English as social constructions rather than linguistic fact, and presents research evidence to debunk common myths about ‘non-standard’ English that circulate in education (for example, that ‘non-standard’ speech will impede progress towards fully-fledged literacy). The chapter ends with reflections on the role sociolinguists have played in educational debates, with suggestions for future work. Ultimately, the chapter makes the case that sociolinguists should adopt a critical, language ideological approach in order to expose and challenge the hierarchies and educational inequalities reproduced through standard language ideology.

Keywords

Standard Englishnon-standardised grammarspeech and writingideologyeducation policydialectinequality
Type
Chapter
Information
Language in Britain and Ireland , pp. 543 - 567
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education 33(5): 561–98.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. (2020). A Dialogic Teaching Companion. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alim, H. S., Rickford, J. R. and Ball, A. F. (eds.) (2016). Raciolinguistics: How Language Shapes Our Ideas about Race. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker-Bell, A. (2020). Linguistic Justice: Black Language, Literacy, Identity and Pedagogy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2014). Social Class in Applied Linguistics. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, D. (2018). The political economy of language education (or the lack thereof): Nancy Fraser and the case of translanguaging. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 15(4): 237–57.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (1999). The debate is open. In Blommaert, J. (ed.), Language Ideological Debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfit, C. (1992). The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2012). Verbal Hygiene, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, R. (1990). Introduction. In Carter, R. (ed.), Knowledge about Language and the Curriculum. London: Hodder & Stoughton, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Carter, R. (1996). Politics and knowledge about language: The LINC Project. In Hasan, R. and Williams, G. (eds.), Literacy in Society. Harlow: Longman, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, J. (1982a). Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, J. (1982b). Dialect features and linguistic conflict in schools. Educational Review 34(1): 53–67.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. and Edwards, V. (1991). Schoolchildren as sociolinguistic researchers. Language and Education 3: 225–49.Google Scholar
Clark, U. (1994). Bringing English to order: A personal account of the NCC English Evaluation Project. English in Education 28(1): 33–8.Google Scholar
Clark, U. (2010). The problematics of prescribing grammatical knowledge: The case of England. In Locke, T. (ed.), Beyond the Grammar Wars. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Constantinou, F. and Chambers, L. (2020). Non-standard English in UK students’ writing over time. Language and Education 34(1): 22–35.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (2000). Sociolinguistic prevarication about ‘standard English’. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(4): 622–34.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, C. B. (1991). Cox on Cox: English Curriculum for the 90’s: English Curriculum for the 1990’s. London: Hodder & Stoughton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crinson, J. and Williamson, J. (2004). Non-standard dialect in the formal speech of 15-year-olds on Tyneside. Language and Education 18(3): 207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, T. (1999). Curiouser and curiouser: Falling standards in the Standard English Debate. In Bex, T. and Watts, R. J. (eds.), Standard English: The Widening Debate. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, T. (2003). Standard English and the Politics of Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2006). The Fight for English: How Language Pundits Ate, Shot, and Left. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, I. (2020a). The policy and policing of language in schools. Language in Society 49(3): 425–50.Google Scholar
Cushing, I. (2020b). Power, policing and language policy mechanisms in schools: A response to Hudson. Language in Society 4(3): 461–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, I. (2023). Policy mechanisms of the standard language ideology in England’s education system. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 22(3): 279–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2021.1877542.Google Scholar
Cushing, I. and Snell, J. (2023). The (white) ears of Ofsted: A raciolinguistic perspective on the listening practices of the schools inspectorate. Language in Society 52(3): 363–86.Google Scholar
DES (Department of Education and Science). (1975). A Language for Life: Report of the Committee of Inquiry Appointed by the Secretary of State for Education and Science under the Chairmanship of Sir Alan Bullock FBA. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DES (Department of Education and Science). (1988). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of English Language (the Kingman Report). London: HMSO.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DES (Department of Education and Science). (1989). Report of the English Working Party 5 to 16 (the Cox Report). London: HMSO.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DfE (Department for Education). (1993). English for Ages 5–16, 1993: Proposals of the Secretary of State for Education and the Secretary of State for Wales (Pascall curriculum). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DfE (Department for Education). (2013). Teachers’ Standards. London: Department for Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DfE (Department for Education). (2014). The National Curriculum in England: Framework Document. London: Department for Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DfE (Department for Education). (2019). National Curriculum Assessments: Key Stage 2. 2019 (Revised). London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
Flores, N. and Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review 85: 149–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S. (2016). Labov in anthropology. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(4): 453–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godley, A. J., Carpenter, B. D. and Werner, C. A. (2007). ‘I’ll speak in proper slang’: Language ideologies in a daily editing activity. Reading Research Quarterly 42: 100–31.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1995). Disappearing language: Fragments and fractures between speech and writing. In Mace, J. (ed.), Literacy, Language and Community Publishing: Essays in Adult Education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 118–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. (2020). Comment on ‘The policy and policing of language in schools’ by Ian Cushing. Language in Society 49(3): 451–60.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. and Holmes, J. (1995). Children’s Use of Spoken Standard English. London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidou, E. (2009). Using the ‘improper’ language in the classroom: The conflict between language use and legitimate varieties in education. Evidence from a Greek Cypriot classroom. Language and Education 23(3): 263–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J. T. and Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp. 35–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. (2015). Policy, Practice and Assessment: Revealing the Relationship between the GCSE English Assessment and Educational Reproduction. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). The logic of non-standard English. Georgetown Monograph on Languages and Linguistics 22: 1–44.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1982). Objectivity and commitment in linguistic science: The case of the Black English trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society 11: 165–201.Google Scholar
Lefstein, A. and Israeli, M. (2015). Applying linguistic ethnography to educational practice: Notes on the interaction of research methods and professional sensibilities. In Snell, J., Shaw, S. and Copland, F. (eds.), Linguistic Ethnography: Interdisciplinary Explorations. London: Palgrave, pp. 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefstein, A. and Snell, J. (2014). Better Than Best Practice: Developing Teaching and Learning through Dialogue. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. (2018). A critique of the principle of error correction as a theory of social change. Language in Society 47(3): 325–46.Google Scholar
MacRuairc, G. (2011a). ‘They’re my words – I’ll talk how I like!’ Examining social class and linguistic practice among primary school children. Language and Education 25: 535–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRuairc, G. (2011b). Where words collide: Social class, school and linguistic discontinuity. British Journal of Sociology of Education 32: 541–61.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. (2011). English in the National Curriculum: A simple redraft or a major rewrite? Curriculum Journal 22(2): 187–99.Google Scholar
Mercer, N. (2008). Talk and the development of reasoning and understanding. Human Development 51: 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. (1999). The consequences of standardisation in descriptive linguistics. In T. Bex, and Watts, R. J. (eds.), Standard English: The Widening Debate. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 16–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, E. (2012). The social life of style. Language and Literature 21(1): 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, E. (2019). Michael Gove’s grammar: Former education minister is gonna rue the day he used Nonstandard English. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/michael-goves-grammar-former-education-minister-is-gonna-rue-the-day-he-used-non-standard-english-125603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, E. (2021). The social meaning of syntax. In Hall-Lew, L., Moore, E. and Podesva, R. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, E. and Podesva, R. (2009). Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38(4): 447–85.Google Scholar
Myhill, D. (2021). Grammar re-imagined: Foregrounding understanding of language choice in writing. English in Education 55(3): 265–78.Google Scholar
Netz, H., Yitzhaki, D. and Lefstein, A. (2018). Language corrections and language ideologies. Language and Education 32(4): 350–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piestrup, A. (1973). Black Dialect Interference and Accommodation of Reading Instruction in First Grade. Berkeley, CA: Monographs of the Language-Behaviour Research Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietikäinen, S. (2016). Critical debates: Discourse, boundaries and social change. In Coupland, N. (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 263–81.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (2006). Language in Late Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. and Clarke, S. (eds.) (2015). Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Rosa, J. (2018). Looking Like a Language, Sounding Like a Race: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and the Learning of Latinidad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosa, J. and Flores, N. (2017). Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society 46(5): 621–47.Google Scholar
Smitherman, G. (2017). Raciolinguistics, ‘mis-education,’ and language arts teaching in the 21st century. Languages Arts Journal of Michigan 32(2): 4–12.Google Scholar
STA (Standards and Testing Agency). (2018). Teacher Assessment Frameworks at the End of Key Stage 2. London: Standards and Testing Agency.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, J. (2010). From sociolinguistic variation to socially strategic stylisation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(5): 618–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, J. (2013). Dialect, interaction and class positioning at school: From deficit to difference repertoire. Language and Education 27(2): 110–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, J. (2015). Linguistic ethnographic perspectives on working-class children’s speech: Challenging discourses of deficit. In Snell, J., Copland, F. and Shaw, S. (eds.), Linguistic Ethnography: Interdisciplinary Explorations. London: Palgrave, pp. 225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, J. (2018a). Critical reflections on the role of the sociolinguist in UK language debates. Language in Society 47(3): 368–74.Google Scholar
Snell, J. (2018b). Solidarity, stance and class identities. Language in Society 47(5): 665–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, J. (2019). Evidence Submitted to the Oracy All-Party-Parliamentary-Group’s ‘Speak for Change’ Inquiry. www.snell.me.uk/wp-content/uploads/JSnell_Speaking_for_Change.pdf.Google Scholar
Snell, J. (in press 2024). Social class and educational inequalities. In E. Moore and C. Montgomery (eds.), Oxford Handbook of British Englishes.Google Scholar
Snell, J. and Andrews, R. (2017). To what extent does a regional dialect and accent impact on the development of reading and writing skills? Cambridge Journal of Education 47(3): 297–313.Google Scholar
Snell, J. and Cushing, I. (2022). ‘A lot of them write how they speak’: Policy, pedagogy, and the policing of non-standard English. Literacy 56(3): 199–211.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1975). Accent, Dialect and the School. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1999). Standard English: What it isn’t. In Bex, T. and Watts, R. (eds.), Standard English: The Widening Debate. London: Routledge, pp. 117–28.Google Scholar
Williams, A. (1989a). Dialect in school written work. In Cheshire, J., Edwards, V., Munstermann, H. and Weltens, B. (eds.), Dialect and Education: Some European Perspectives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp 182–99.Google Scholar
Williams, A. (1989b). The Influence of Non-Standard Dialect on Children’s School Writing. Unpublished PhD thesis, Birkbeck College, London.Google Scholar
Williams, A. (2007). Non-standard English and education. In Britain, D. (ed.), Language in the British Isles, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 401–16.Google Scholar
Williams, O. (2013). Primary school tells parents to stop children using slang phrases as it is preventing them from learning ‘standard’ English. The Daily Mail, 5 February 2013. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2273821/Middlesbrough-parents-clamp-local-expressions-home-children-learn-standard-English.html#axzz2KWn3AVOG.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. (1990). ‘Divven’t wite that, man’: The influence of Tyneside dialect forms on children’s free writing. Educational Studies 16(3): 251–60.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. (1995). Canny writers: Tyneside dialect and the writing of secondary school students. Educational Studies 21(1): 3–12.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. and Hardman, F. (1997a). To purify the dialect of the tribe: Children’s use of nonstandard dialect grammar in writing. Educational Studies 23: 157–68.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. and Hardman, F. (1997b). Those terrible marks of the beast: Nonstandard dialect and children’s writing. Language and Education 11: 287–99.Google Scholar
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.Google Scholar
Woolard, K. A. (1998). Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Schieffelin, B. B., Woolard, K. and Kroskrity, P. V. (eds.), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–47.Google Scholar
Wortham, S. (2006). Learning Identity: The Joint Emergence of Social Identification and Academic Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×