Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part 1 Portrait of the Anarchist as an Old Man
- Part 2 Coming Out of Russia
- Part 3 Revolution and Evolution
- Introduction to Part 3: The General Idea of Anarchy
- 5 Anarchism: Utopian and Scientific
- 6 The Revolution Will Not Be Historicised
- Conclusion to Part 3
- Reviewing the Classical Anarchist Tradition
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Introduction to Part 3: The General Idea of Anarchy
from Part 3 - Revolution and Evolution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2016
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part 1 Portrait of the Anarchist as an Old Man
- Part 2 Coming Out of Russia
- Part 3 Revolution and Evolution
- Introduction to Part 3: The General Idea of Anarchy
- 5 Anarchism: Utopian and Scientific
- 6 The Revolution Will Not Be Historicised
- Conclusion to Part 3
- Reviewing the Classical Anarchist Tradition
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
As Kropotkin's exile advanced, he developed the ideas he had set out in the 1880s to challenge the cultural prejudices that dismissed anarchist organising as unviable. Publishing some of his best known work during this period, notably Mutual Aid. A Factor of Evolution, The Conquest of Bread and Fields, Factories and Workshops: Or, Industry Combined with Agriculture and Brain Work with Manual Work, Kropotkin set out an evolutionary, scientific conception of anarchism and explored a number of ideas about the economics of anarchy, cementing his reputation for scientism, utopianism and political reformism at the same time. In The Conquest of Bread, Alfredo Bonnano argues, Kropotkin rightly presented an idea of revolution as a process, but was unable to escape the philosophical conventions of his time and took ‘scientific determinism’ as ‘his point of departure’.
The strategy Kropotkin adopted to address issues of structural and cultural change in the 1890s and 1900s helps explain this dominant reading of his work. Kropotkin's ambition was to instil confidence in the revolutionary movement by explaining the possibilities for non-hierarchical organising and to challenge doctrines that seemed to suggest anarchism's redundancy. In pursuing this strategy, he continued to address a range of different audiences, appropriating dominant discourses and moulding them to his own purposes. Darwin was only one of the leading writers he recruited for the anarchist cause. As Matthew Adams has shown, Kropotkin also engaged with the anti-collectivist liberalism of Herbert Spencer. Kropotkin's eagerness to show that significant cultural figures advocated ideas that tended towards anarchist conclusions was not entirely cynical: he made no secret of his admiration for Darwin. However, advertising these correspondences and borrowing the idioms of mainstream debate was a dangerous game and one that exposed Kropotkin to the criticism that he diluted his anarchism as a result. Yet the task Kropotkin set himself was to find a way of ensuring that the power to implement revolutionary change remained in the hands of oppressed groups.
Kropotkin's military experiences helped him formulate his ideas about the need to address the practical aspects of anarchist transformation.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- KropotkinReviewing the Classical Anarchist Tradition, pp. 119 - 126Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2016