Book contents
CONCLUSION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 October 2009
Summary
We will not fully understand the phenomenon of war – nor be as dexterous as we might in avoiding it – until we begin to appreciate the multidimensionality of its causes. This book demonstrates that the justice motive can contribute to the outbreak of war in a complex variety of ways, and that many wars that seem puzzling from a traditional Realist perspective emphasizing the motives of self-preservation and self-aggrandizement can be explained more satisfactorily once we appreciate the importance and the agency of moral motivations.
It seems likely that as a result of its failure to take these motivations seriously, political science has paid an enormous opportunity cost. Perhaps that cost might have been avoided if the scientific approach to international relations had supplemented, rather than rejected, the more humanistic tradition it displaced. Terry Nardin writes:
In place of a familiar world in which people deliberated, made decisions, and acted on the basis of reasons and with reference to rules, there appeared a new world of phenomena and processes to be accounted for in terms of forces, variables, correlations, and causal laws. Theorists turned from the interpretation of “conduct” to the explanation of “behavior.” It was not merely the idea of international society that had become discredited, but a whole way of looking at international relations.
But the entrenchment of the scientific approach does not militate against the possibility of richer, more subtle, and more useful political science.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Justice and the Genesis of War , pp. 217 - 219Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1993