Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:07:59.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Agricultural disturbance: diversity and effects on invertebrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

T. R. New
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

Discussion of the characteristics of agroecosystems and their conventional management for crop protection helps us to focus more closely on the threats to invetebrates introduced in the previous chapter. Understanding the needs and principles of pest management is a critical theme in invertebrate conservation in agroecosystems, and the rationales of pest definition and evaluation underpin crop-protection measures. This chapter also introduces a major concern in crop protection and its incompatability with conservation: the use of pesticides that may have substantial undesirable side effects, and how these may be appraised and overcome through development of wider integrated pest-management programmes for both economic and environmental benefits.

Introduction

Agroecosystems are, essentially, ‘disturbed’ ecosystems. The disturbances are equated to varying extents with threats to the natural biota that they subsume through initial establishment and continuing management and diversification. Disturbance, very broadly, may alter the diversity within an ecosystem directly (by killing individuals) or indirectly (by changing resource quality and accessibiity). If disturbance is severe, then biodiversity tends to be reduced, because only the relatively low proportion of taxa that are insensitive to the disturbance can persist. ‘Disturbance’ can be defined as the cause of a perturbation – that is, of an effect or change in the state of the ecosystem relative to an undisturbed reference ecosystem (Rykiel, 1985).

In Chapter 1, some of the differences between agroecosystems and more natural ecosystems were discussed, but it is important also to recognise the similarities and parallels between them.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×