Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:15:36.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

36 - Complementarity in Uganda: domestic diversity or international imposition?

from PART VI - Complementarity in practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Carsten Stahn
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Mohamed M. El Zeidy
Affiliation:
International Criminal Court
Get access

Summary

Complementarity has assumed a role far beyond that of ‘cornerstone’ of the Rome Statute. This chapter reviews the effects that complementarity has catalysed in the Ugandan criminal justice system. Reviewing the effects of an increase in studies of traditional justice, on preparations for a Ugandan War Crimes Court, on a Ugandan International Crimes Act and on Ugandan attention for so-called ‘international standards’, the chapter argues that even though the text of Article 17 of the Rome Statute allows states substantial leeway as to how they wish to render cases inadmissible before the International Criminal Court (‘ICC’), the interpretation by the Court and other proponents of international criminal justice has favoured soft imposition of an international model of criminal justice to diversity among domestic and international criminal justice systems.

Introduction

Complementarity has assumed a role far beyond that of ‘cornerstone’ of the Rome Statute. The principle, which regulates concurrent claims to jurisdiction by domestic courts and the International Criminal Court (‘ICC’), has begun to shape the normative architecture of peace-making. The peace talks between the Lord's Resistance Army (‘LRA’) and the Ugandan government that took place in the capital of South Sudan between 2006 and 2008 are one of the first examples. Complementarity became the lynchpin of the Juba peace talks. The principle has catalysed several developments that were unprecedented in Uganda.

Type
Chapter
Information
The International Criminal Court and Complementarity
From Theory to Practice
, pp. 1120 - 1154
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Complementarity in the Line of Fire: The Catalysing Effect of the International Criminal Court in Uganda and Sudan (forthcoming)
By way of exception, the Ugandan Director of Public Prosecutions did charge three LRA leaders in 1999 (Uganda v. Otti Lagony, Kony Joseph and Matsanga David Nyekorach, Charge Sheet, E/31/99, 25 January 1999 and, in the same case, Warrants of Arrest, 4 February 1999, on file with author)
Cárdenas, C., Die Zulässigkeitsprüfung vor dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof, zur Auslegung des Art. 17 ISTGH-Statut under Besonderer Berücksichtigung von Amnestien und Wahrheitskommissionen (2005)
Kleffner, J. K., Complementarity in the Rome Statute and National Criminal Jurisdictions (2008)
Miskowiak, K., The International Criminal Court: Consent, Complementarity and Cooperation (2000)
Razesberger, F., The International Criminal Court: The Principle of Complementarity (2006)
Stigen, J., The Relationship between the International Criminal Court and National Jurisdictions: The Principle of Complementarity (2008)
el Zeidy, M. M., The Principle of Complementarity in International Criminal Law: Origin, Development and Practice (2008)
Brown, B. (ed.), Research Handbook on International Criminal Law (2011)
See Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on the Prosecutor's Application for a Warrant of Arrest, Article 58, ICC-01/04–01/06–8, 10 February 2006, para. 31
Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga, Decision on the Evidence and Information Provided by the Prosecution for the Issuance of a Warrant of Arrest for Germain Katanga, ICC-01/04–01/07–55, 5 November 2007 (decision taken on 6 July 2007), para. 20
Prosecutor v. Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, Decision on the Evidence and Information Provided by the Prosecution for the Issuance of a Warrant of Arrest for Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04–02/07–3 / ICC-01/04–01/07–262, 6 July 2007, para. 21
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Decision on the Prosecutor's Application for Warrants of Arrest, Article 58, ICC-01/04–02/06–20-Anx2, 21 July 2008, paras. 34–41
Prosecutor v. Ahmad Muhammad Harun (‘Ahmad Harun’) and Ali Muhammad Al Abd-Al-Rahman (‘Ali Kushayb’), Decision on the Prosecution Application under Article 58(7) of the Statute, ICC-02/05–01/07–1, 27 April 2007, para. 24
For the requirement of the same ‘incidents’, see Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Decision on the Applications for Participation in the Proceedings of VPRS 1, VPRS 2, VPRS 3, VPRS 4, VPRS 5 and VPRS 6, ICC-01/04–101, 17 January 2006, para. 65 (‘Decision VPRS 1–6’)
Situation in Darfur, the Sudan, Prosecutor's Application under Article 58(7), ICC-02/05–56, 27 February 2007, paras. 265 and 267. See also Rod Rastan (Chapter 15), Section 3
Baines, E. K., ‘The Haunting of Alice: Local Approaches to Justice and Reconciliation in Northern Uganda’, (2007) 1 IJTJ. 91, 96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlacher, T., Traditional Ways of Coping in Acholi: Cultural Provisions for Reconciliation and Healing from War (2006), 9–10)
Allen, T., Trial Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Lord's Resistance Army (2006), 87
See Liu Institute for Global Issues and Gulu District NGO Forum, Roco Wat I Acoli, supra note 33, 12, 72 and 124 and Gulu District NGO Forum and Liu Institute for Global Issues, Justice and Reconciliation Project, ‘The Cooling of Hearts: Community Truth-Telling in Acholi-Land’ (2007), 7
Allen, T. in Waddell, N. and Clarke, P., Peace, Justice & the ICC in Africa, Meeting Series Report (2007), 27
Dolan, C., ‘Imposed Justice and the Need for Sustainable Peace in Uganda’, Presentation to the Beyond Juba Project/Amani Forum Training, Transitional Justice for Parliamentarians, Entebbe, 18 July 2008
Quinn, J. R., ‘“Accountability and Reconciliation”: Traditional Mechanisms of Acknowledgement and the Implications of the Juba Peace Process’, paper presented at the Reconstructing Northern Uganda, Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict Working Group Conference, University of Western Ontario, 9 April 2008), 9, cited with the author's permission)
Allen, T., ‘The International Criminal Court and the Invention of Traditional Justice in Northern Uganda’, (2007) Politique africaine, no. 107, 162
Human Rights Watch, Benchmarks for Assessing Possible National Alternatives to International Criminal Court Cases against LRA Leaders: A Human Rights Watch Memorandum (2007)
Oomen, B., ‘Donor-Driven Justice and its Discontents: The Case of Rwanda’, (2005) 36(5) Development & Change 887, 902–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A petition (The Constitutional Court of Uganda at Kampala, Constitutional Petition No. 10, John Magezi, Judy Obitre-Gama, Henry Onoria v. Attorney General, 27 July 2005) challenging the constitutionality of the government's ratification of the Rome Statute was another factor that initially delayed the parliamentary debate
du Plessis, M. and Ford, J. (eds.), Unable or Unwilling? Case Studies on Domestic Implementation of the ICC Statute in Selected African Countries (2008) 93, 94, 99
Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K., ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, (1998) 52(4) Int'l Org. 887, 893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, E. A., ‘Tribunal-Hopping with the Post-Conflict Justice Junkies’, (2009) 10 Or. Rev Int'l L. 361, 385Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., From Apology to Utopia: the Structure of International Legal Argument (2005), 600–15
Ratner, S. R., ‘The International Criminal Court and the Limits of Global Judicialization’, (2003) 38 Tex.Int'l L J. 445, 453Google Scholar
Drumbl, M., Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law (2007), 13–14, aptly observes that ‘there is little advantage in venerating the local or that which otherwise differs from dominant discourse simply to promote pluralistic difference as an end in itself.…That said, history also boasts of many examples of failed impositions, imperial projects, and cultural manipulation

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×