Aalders, G. J. D. (1975) Political Thought in Hellenistic Times. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Achard, G. (1981) Pratique rhétorique et idéologie politique dans les discours ‘optimates’ de Cicéron (Mnemosyne Suppl. 68). Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achard, G. (1989) Rhétorique à Herennius: texte établi et traduit. Paris.Google Scholar

Adamietz, J. (1986) ‘Ciceros Verfahren in den Ambitus-Prozessen gegen Murena und Plancius’, Gymnasium 93: 102–17.Google Scholar

Adcock, F. E. (1964) Roman Political Ideas and Practice. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Akar, P. (2013) Concordia: un idéal de la classe dirigeante romaine à la fin de la République (Histoire ancienne et médiévale 122). Paris.Google Scholar

Alexander, M. C. (1990) Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC (Phoenix Suppl. 26). Toronto.Google Scholar

Alexander, M. C. (1999) ‘The role of Torquatus the Younger in the ambitus prosecution of Sulla in 66 B.C., and Cicero De Finibus 2.62’, CPh 94: 65–9.Google Scholar

Alexander, M. C. (2002) The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Alexander, M. C. (2009) ‘The Commentariolum Petitionis as an attack on election campaigns’, Athenaeum 97: 31–57, 369–95.Google Scholar

Allen, W. Jr. (1938) ‘On the friendship of Lucretius with Memmius’, CPh 33: 167–82.Google Scholar

Allen, W. Jr. (1950) ‘The “Vettius Affair” once more’, TAPhA 81: 153–63.Google Scholar

Allen, W. Jr. and De Lacey, P. H. (1939) ‘The patrons of Philodemus’, CPh 34: 59–65.Google Scholar

Amela Valverde, L. (2005) ‘Un pasaje de Plutarco: Pompeyo y Peticio’, Helmantica 56: 45–56.Google Scholar

Anastasiadis, V. I. (1999) ‘Inventing a κακοήθευμα: a propagandist attack against P. Rutilius Rufus’, PP 54: 48–68.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1963) Pompey, His Friends, and the Literature of the First Century B.C. (University of California Publications in Classical Philology 19.1). Berkeley.Google Scholar

André, J. M. (1966) L’Otium dans la vie morale et intellectuelle romaine, des origines à l’époque augustéenne (Recherches 30). Paris.Google Scholar

Andreau, J. (1999) Banking and Business in the Roman World, trans. Lloyd, J.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Andreau, J. and Bruhns, H. (eds.) (1990) Parenté et stratégies familiales dans ‘l‘antiquité’ romaine: actes de la table ronde des 2–4 octobre 1986 (Paris, Maison des Sciences de l’homme) (Collection de l’Ecole française de Rome 129). Rome.Google Scholar

Arena, V. (2011) ‘Three conceptions of liberty: Roman sumptuary legislation’, European Journal of Political Theory 10: 463–89.Google Scholar

Arena, V. (2012) Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. (2011) ‘Epicurean virtues, Epicurean friendship: Cicero vs. the Herculaneum papyri’, in Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, eds. Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R.. Cambridge: 105–28.Google Scholar

Arrayás Morales, I. (2010) ‘Diplomacy in the Greek poleis of Asia Minor: Mytilene’s embassy to Tarraco’, C&M 61: 127–49.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E. (1960) ‘Dicta Scipionis of 131 B.C.’, CQ 10: 135–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Astin, A. E. (1967) Scipio Aemilianus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E. (1978) Cato the Censor. Oxford.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E. (1988) ‘Regimen morum’, JRS 78: 14–34.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1958) Foreign Clientelae (264–70 B.C.). Oxford.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1969) ‘Quaestiones variae’, Historia 18: 447–91.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1970) Lucius Sulla: The Deadly Reformer (Todd Memorial Lecture 7). Sydney.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1996) ‘Tribuni Plebis and Res Publica’, in Imperium Sine Fine: T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic, ed. Linderski, J. (Historia Einzelschriften 105). Stuttgart: 187–213.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1997) ‘Notes on a recent list of praefecti fabrum under the Republic’, Chiron 27: 1–19.Google Scholar

Balázs, G. (1986) ‘Clementia and divinitas: a study of political thought in the first century B.C.’, Oikumene 5: 243–327.Google Scholar

Balbo, A. (2013) ‘Marcus Junius Brutus the orator: between philosophy and rhetoric’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. E. W. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 315–28.Google Scholar

Balsdon, J. P. V. D. (1951) ‘Sulla Felix’, JRS 41: 1–10.Google Scholar

Balsdon, J. P. V. D. (1979) Romans and Aliens. London.Google Scholar

Baltrusch, E. (1989) Regimen morum. Die Reglementierung des Privatlebens der Senatoren und Ritter in der römischen Republik und frühen Kaiserzeit (Vestigia 41). Munich.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. T. (eds.) (1997) Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Baudy, D. (1998) Römische Umgangsriten. Eine ethologische Untersuchung der Funktion von Wiederholung für religiöses Verhalten (Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten 43). Berlin.Google Scholar

Bayet, J. (1936) ‘Présages figuratifs déterminants dans l’antiquité Gréco-Latine’, in Mélanges Franz Cumont (2 vols.; Annuaire de l’Institut de philologie et d’histoire orientales et slaves 4). Brussels: 27–51 (= Bayet, J. (1971): 44–63).Google Scholar

Bayet, J. (1960) ‘Les malédictions du tribun C. Aetius Capito’, in Hommages à Georges Dumézil (Coll. Latomus 45). Brussels: 31–45 (= Bayet, J. (1971): 353–65).Google Scholar

Bayet, J. (1971) Croyances et rites dans la Rome antique. Paris.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2007) The Roman Triumph. London.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2012) ‘Cicero’s “Response of the haruspices” and the voice of the gods’, JRS 102: 20–39.Google Scholar

Beard, M., North, J. and Price, S. R. F. (1998) Religions of Rome (2 vols.). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Beck, H. (2005) Karriere und Hierarchie. Die römische Aristokratie und die Anfänge des cursus honorum in der mittleren Republik (Klio 10). Berlin.Google Scholar

Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M. and Pina Polo, F. (eds.) (2011) Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Behr, H. (1993) Die Selbstdarstellung Sullas. Ein aristokratischer Politiker zwischen persönlichem Führungsanspruch und Standessolidarität (Europäische Hochschulschriften. Reihe 3, Geschichte und ihre Hilfswissenschaften 539). Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Bell, A. J. E. (1997) ‘Cicero and the spectacle of power’, JRS 87: 1–22.Google Scholar

Beloch, J. (1886) Die Bevölkerung der griechisch-römischen Welt (Historische Beiträge zur Bevölkerungslehre 1). Leipzig.Google Scholar

Beltrán Lloris, F. (2015) ‘The hospitium publicum of Gades and Cornelius Balbus’, in Foreign Clientelae in the Roman Empire: A Reconsideration, eds. Jehne, M. and Pina Polo, F. (Historia Einzelschriften 238). Stuttgart: 141–52.Google Scholar

Beneker, J. (2005) ‘Thematic correspondences in Plutarch’s Lives of Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus’, in The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society, Nijmegen, Castle Hernen, May 1–5, 2002, vol. II: The Statesman in Plutarch’s Greek and Roman Lives, eds. de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T. and Schenkeveld, D. M. (Mnemosyne Suppl. 250). Leiden: 315–25.Google Scholar

Beness, J. L. (forthcoming) The Tribunate from Saturninus to Sulla: 103–88 B.C. Turnhout.Google Scholar

Beness, J. L. and Hillard, T. W. (1990) ‘The death of Lucius Equitius on 10 December 100 B.C.’, CQ 40: 269–72.Google Scholar

Beness, J. L. and Hillard, T.W. (2001) ‘The theatricality of the deaths of C. Gracchus and Friends’, CQ 51: 135–40.Google Scholar

Bennett, S. E. (1986) Apathy in America, 1960–1984: Causes and Consequences of Citizen Political Indifference. Dobbs Ferry, NY.Google Scholar

Berg, D. (1995) ‘The mystery gourmet of Horace’s Satires 2’, CJ 91: 141–51.Google Scholar

Berry, D. H. (1993) ‘Pompey’s legal knowledge – or lack of it: Cic. Mil. 70 and the date of Pro Milone’, Historia 42: 502–4.Google Scholar

Berry, D. H. (1996) Cicero: Pro P. Sulla Oratio (Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 30). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Berry, D. H. (2000) Cicero: Defence Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar

Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A. (eds.) (2010) Form and Function in Roman Oratory. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bilinski, B. (1957) Accio ed i Gracchi: contributo alla storia della plebe e della tragedia romana (Conferenze: Polska Akademia Nauk. Stacja Naukowa w Rzymie 3). Rome.Google Scholar

Bleicken, J. (1955) Das Volkstribunat der klassischen Republik. Studien zu seiner Entwicklung zwischen 287 und 133 v. Chr. (Zetemata 13). Munich.Google Scholar

Bleicken, J. (1962) ‘Der Begriff der Freiheit in der letzten Phase der römischen Republik’, HZ 195: 1–20.Google Scholar

Bleicken, J. (1975) Lex publica. Gesetz und Recht in der römischen Republik. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloch, H. (1940) ‘L. Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus in Samothrace and Herculaneum’, AJA 44: 485–93.Google Scholar

Blom, H. van der (2010) Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.Google Scholar

Blom, H. van der (2011a) ‘Pompey in the contio’, CQ 61: 553–73.Google Scholar

Blom, H. van der (2011b) ‘Historical exempla as tools of praise and blame in Ciceronian oratory’, in Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Oratory, ed. Smith, C. J. and Covino, R.. Swansea: 49–68.Google Scholar

Blom, H. van der (2012) ‘Cato and the People’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 55(2): 39–56.Google Scholar

Blom, H. van der (2013) ‘Fragmentary speeches: the oratory and political career of Piso Caesoninus’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. E. W., and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 299–314.Google Scholar

Blom, H. van der (2016) Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Blom, H. van der (2017) ‘Sulla in the contio: an oratorical episode in pieces’, in Fragments, Holes, and Wholes, eds. Kwapisz, J., Derda, T. and Hilder, J.. Warsaw: 181–95.Google Scholar

Blösel, W. (2000) ‘Die Geschichte des Begriffes Mos Maiorum von den Anfängen bis zu Cicero’, in Mos maiorum. Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik, eds. Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. (Historia Einzelschriften 141). Stuttgart: 25–97.Google Scholar

Bonnefond-Coudry, M. (1989) Le Sénat de la République romaine de la guerre d’Hannibal à Auguste: pratiques délibératives et prise de décision (Bibliothèque des Ecoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 273). Rome.Google Scholar

Booth, J. (ed.) (2007) Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in Orations and Beyond. Swansea.Google Scholar

Borgies, L. (2016) Le conflict propagandiste entre Octavien et Marc Antoine: de l’usage politique de la uituperatio entre 44 et 30 a.C.n. (Coll. Latomus 357). Brussels.Google Scholar

Botsford, G. W. (1909) The Roman Assemblies from Their Origin to the End of the Republic. New York.Google Scholar

Bourne, F. C. (1977) ‘Caesar the Epicurean’, CW 70: 417–32.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. (1965) Augustus and the Greek World. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (2011) ‘Men from Mytilene’, in The Struggle for Identity: Greeks and Their Past in the First Century BCE, eds. Schmitz, T. A. and Wiater, N.. Stuttgart: 181–95.Google Scholar

Boyancé, P. (1950) ‘Lucrèce et son disciple’, REA 52: 212–33.Google Scholar

Bradley, K. R. (1997) ‘Law, magic, and culture in the Apologia of Apuleius’, Phoenix 51: 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braund, S. M. (2009) Seneca: De Clementia. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. N. (1999) ‘The birth of the term “magic”’, ZPE 126: 1–12.Google Scholar

Brennan, T. C. (1992) ‘Sulla’s career in the nineties: some reconsiderations’, Chiron 22: 103–58.Google Scholar

Brennan, T. C. (2000) The Praetorship in the Roman Republic (2 vols.). Oxford.Google Scholar

Brennan, T. C. (2012) ‘Perceptions of women’s power in the late Republic: Terentia, Fulvia and the generation of 63 BCE’, in A Companion to Women in the Ancient World, eds. James, S. L. and Dillon, S.. Chichester: 354–66.Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. (2008) A Commentary on Livy, Books 38–40. Oxford.Google Scholar

Broughton, T. R. S. (1951–86) The Magistrates of the Roman Republic (3 vols.; Philological Monographs 15). New York.Google Scholar

Broughton, T. R. S. (1991) Candidates Defeated in Roman Elections: Some Ancient Roman ‘Also-rans’ (TAPhA 81.4). Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Brown, E. A. (2009) ‘Politics and society’, in The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. Warren, J.. Cambridge: 179–96.Google Scholar

Bruhns, H., David, J.-M. and Nippel, W. (eds.) (1997) Die späte römische Republik: La fin de la république romaine: un débat franco-allemand d’histoire et d’historiographie (Collection de l’Ecole française de Rome 235). Rome.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1965) ‘“Amicitia” in the late Roman Republic’, PCPhS 11: 1–20.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1980) ‘Patronage and politics in the Verrines’, Chiron 10: 273–89.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1982) ‘The legal issue in Cicero, Pro Balbo’, CQ 32: 136–47.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1987) Italian Manpower, 225 B.C.–A.D. 14. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1988) The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bücher, F. (2006) Verargumentierte Geschichte. Exempla Romana im politischen Diskurs der späten römischen Republik (Hermes Einzelschriften 96). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Buongiorno, P. (2011) ‘Ateii Capitones’, Iura 59: 195–216.Google Scholar

Burckhardt, L. A. (1988) Politische Strategien der Optimaten in der späten römischen Republik (Historia Einzelschriften 57). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Busby, R. (2006) ‘Not as rich as you think: class, rhetoric, and candidate portrayal during national elections in the United States and the United Kingdom’, in Winning Elections with Political Marketing, eds. Davies, P. J. and Newman, B.. New York: 59–80.Google Scholar

Butler, S. (2002) The Hand of Cicero. London.Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1999) Giulio Cesare: il dittatore democratico. Rome.Google Scholar

Caplan, H. (1954) Rhetorica ad Herennium. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Carlsen, J. (2006) The Rise and Fall of a Noble Roman Family: The Domitii Ahenobarbi 196 BC–AD 68. Odense.Google Scholar

Castner, C. J. (1988) Prosopography of Roman Epicureans from the Second Century B.C. to the Second Century A.D. (Studien zur klassischen Philologie 34). Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Catalano, P. (1960) Contributi allo studio del diritto augurale (vol. I; Memorie dell’Istituto Giuridico), Università di Torino, ser. 2, 107). Turin.Google Scholar

Champion, C. B. (2004) ‘Polybian demagogues in political context’, HSPh 102: 199–212.Google Scholar

Churchill, J. B. (1999) ‘Ex qua quod vellent facerent: Roman magistrates’ authority over praeda and manubiae’, TAPhA 129: 85–116.Google Scholar

Citroni Marchetti, S. (2004) ‘“I could not love Caesar more”: Roman friendship and the beginning of the Principate’, CJ 99: 281–99.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2007) Divine Qualities: Cult and Community in Republican Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clark, M. E. and Ruebel, J. S. (1985) ‘Philosophy and rhetoric in Cicero’s Pro Milone’, RhM 128: 57–72.Google Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. C. and Whiteley, P. F. (2009) Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (1997) ‘Domestici hostes: the Nausicaa in Medea, the Catiline in Hannibal’, MD 39: 165–85.Google Scholar

Clemente, G. (1981) ‘Le leggi sul lusso e la società romana tra III e II secolo a. Cr.’, in Società romana e produzione schiavistica, vol. III: Modelli etici, diritto e trasformazioni sociali, eds. Giardina, A. and Schiavone, A.. Bari: 1–14.Google Scholar

Clemente, G. (1985) ‘Lucilio e la società romana’, Index 13: 47–62.Google Scholar

Clemente, G. (1990a) ‘Tradizioni familiari e prassi politica nella repubblica romana: tra mos maiorum e individualismo’, in Parenté et stratégies familiales dans ‘l´antiquité’ romaine: actes de la table ronde des 2–4 octobre 1986 (Paris, Maison des Sciences de l’homme), eds. Andreau, J. and Bruhns, H. (Collection de l’Ecole française de Rome 129). Rome: 595–608.Google Scholar

Clemente, G. (1990b) ‘La politica romana nell’età dell’imperialismo’, in Storia di Roma, vol. II: L’impero mediterraneo 1, La repubblica imperiale, eds. Momigliano, A. and Schiavone, A.. Turin: 235–66.Google Scholar

Clemente, G. (2010) ‘Cicerone, Clodio e la censura: la politica e l’ideale’, in Munuscula: scritti in ricordo di Luigi Amirante, ed. Dovere, E.. Naples: 51–73.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1988) Il sepolcro degli Scipioni a Roma. Rome.Google Scholar

Cogitore, I. (2010) Le doux nom de la liberté: histoire d’une idée politique dans la Rome antique (Scripta antiqua/Ausonius 31). Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Cole, S. (2013) Cicero and the Rise of Deification at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cole, T. (1998) ‘Venus and Mars (De rerum natura 1.31–40)’, in Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendel Clausen, eds. Knox, P. E. and Foss, C. (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 92). Stuttgart: 3–15.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (1996) Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2002) ‘Rhetorical education in Cicero’s youth’, in Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J. M.. Leiden: 22–48.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2010) ‘The function of a divinely inspired text in Cicero’s De haruspicum responsis’, in Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A.. Cambridge: 139–54.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (1995) The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 BC). London.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (2000) ‘The Lex Ovinia and the emancipation of the Senate’, in The Roman Middle Republic: Politics, Religion and Historiography c. 400–133 B.C. (Papers from a Conference at the Institutum Romanum Finlandiae, September 11–12, 1988), ed. Bruun, C. (Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 23). Rome: 69–89.Google Scholar

Courrier, C. (2014) La plèbe de Rome et sa culture: fin du II^e siècle av. J.-C.–fin du I^er siècle ap. J.-C. (Bibliothèque des Écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 353). Rome.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (2003) The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Craig, C. (2004) ‘Audience expectations, invective, and proof’, in Cicero the Advocate, eds. Powell, J. G. F. and Paterson, J.. Oxford: 187–213.Google Scholar

Craig, C. (2010) ‘Means and ends of indignatio in Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino’, in Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A.. Cambridge: 75–91.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. W. (1984) M. Tullius Cicero: The Lost and Unpublished Orations (Hypomnemata 80). Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, J. W. (1994) M. Tullius Cicero: The Fragmentary Speeches (2nd edn; American Classical Studies 33). Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. (1978) ‘Greek intellectuals and the Roman aristocracy in the first century B.C.’, in Imperialism in the Ancient World: The Cambridge University Research Seminar in Ancient History, eds. Garnsey, P. D. A. and Whittaker, C. R.. Cambridge: 193–207.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. (1996) Roman Statutes (2 vols.; BICS Suppl. 64). London.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. (2008) ‘States waiting in the wings: population distribution and the end of the Roman Republic’, in People, Land, and Politics: Demographic Developments and the Transformation of Roman Italy, 300 BC–AD 14, eds. de Ligt, L. and Northwood, S. J. (Mnemosyne Suppl. 303). Leiden: 631–43.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. (2011) ‘Reconstructing what Roman Republic?’, BICS 54: 105–14.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. and Sblendorio Cugusi, M. T. (2001) Opere di Marco Porcio Catone Censore. Turin.Google Scholar

Dahmen, K. (2001) Untersuchungen zu Form und Funktion kleinformatiger Porträts der römischen Kaiserzeit. Münster.Google Scholar

Dart, C. J. (2014) The Social War, 91 to 88 BCE: A History of the Italian Insurgency against the Roman Republic. Farnham.Google Scholar

David, J. M. (1983) ‘L’action oratoire de C. Gracchus. L’image d’un modèle’, in Demokratia et aristokratia: à propos de Caius Gracchus, mots grecs et réalités romaines, ed. Nicolet, C. (Histoire ancienne et médiévale 10). Paris: 103–16.Google Scholar

Degrassi, A. (1954) Fasti Capitolini. Turin.Google Scholar

De Lacey, P. (1941) ‘Cicero’s invective against Piso’, TAPhA 72: 49–58.Google Scholar

DeLuca, T. (1995) The Two Faces of Political Apathy. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

de Martino, F. (1972–90) Storia della constituzione romana (6 vols., 2nd edn). Naples.Google Scholar

Dement’eva, V. V. (2003) Децемвират в римской государственно-правовой системе середины V в. до н.э. [Decemvirat v rimskoj gosudarstvenno-pravovoj sisteme serediny V v. do n.e. (The Decemvirate in the Roman Constitution of the Middle of the Fifth Century BC)]. Moscow.Google Scholar

Demetriou, K. N. (1999) George Grote on Plato and Athenian Democracy: A Study in Classical Reception (Koinon 2). Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Demougin, S. (2000) ‘Les acteurs secondaires dans la révolution romaine de R. Syme’, in La révolution romaine après Ronald Syme: bilans et perspectives. Sept exposés suivis de discussions, Vandoeuvres-Genève, 6–10 septembre 1999, eds. Millar, F. and Giovannini, A. (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique 46). Geneva.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2005) Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. Oxford.Google Scholar

Denver, D. T., Carman, C. J. and Johns, R. (2012) Elections and Voters in Britain (3rd edn). Basingstoke.Google Scholar

Deroux, C. O. (2002) ‘Le praenomen du poète (et tribun de la plèbe?) Helvius Cinna: (Catulle X, 29–30 et Valère Maxime IX, 9, 1)’, Latomus 61: 971–2.Google Scholar

Dettenhoffer, M. H. (1990) ‘Cicero und C. Cassius Longinus: politische Korrespondenz ein Jahr vor Caesars Ermordung (Cic. fam. 15, 16–19)’, Historia 39: 249–56.Google Scholar

Develin, R. (1978a) ‘Scipio Aemilianus and the consular elections of 148 B.C.’, Latomus 37: 484–8.Google Scholar

Develin, R. (1978b) ‘The Atinian plebiscite, tribunes and the Senate’, CQ 28: 141–4.Google Scholar

De Witt, N. W. (1954) Epicurus and His Philosophy. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Dickie, M. W. (2001) Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman World. London.Google Scholar

Diehl, H. (1988) Sulla und seine Zeit im Urteil Ciceros (Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 7). Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1996) ‘Gaio Bambino’, ZPE 111: 41–2.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E. (1960) ‘Clausulae in the Rhetorica ad Herennium as evidence of its date’, CQ 10: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowling, M. B. (2006) Clemency and Cruelty in the Roman World. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Dragstedt, A. (1969) ‘Cato’s politeuma’, ΑΓΩΝ [Agon] 3: 69–96.Google Scholar

Drexler, H. (1956) ‘Maiestas’, Aevum 30: 195–212.Google Scholar

Dufallo, B. (2001) ‘Appius’ indignation: gossip, tradition and performance in republican Rome’, TAPhA 131: 119–42.Google Scholar

Dufallo, B. (2007) The Ghosts of the Past: Latin Literature, the Dead, and Rome’s Transition to a Principate. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2008) ‘Rivals into partners: Hortensius and Cicero’, Historia 57: 142–73.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2010) Cicero: Pro Sexto Roscio. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dyck, A.R. (2013) Cicero: Pro Marco Caelio. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dyer, R. R. (1990) ‘Rhetoric and intention in Cicero’s Pro Marcello’, JRS 80: 17–30.Google Scholar

Earl, D. C. (1962) ‘Terence and Roman politics’, Historia 11: 469–85.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (1997) ‘Zu kleinasiatischen Inschriften (Ephesos; Museum Bursa)’, ZPE 117: 107–16.Google Scholar

Eckert, A. (2014) ‘Remembering cultural trauma: Sulla’s proscriptions, Roman responses and Christian perspectives’, in Trauma and Traumatization in Individual and Collective Dimensions: Insights from Biblical Studies and Beyond, eds. Becker, E.-M., Dochhorn, J. and Holt, E. K. (Studia Aarhusiana Neotestamentica 2). Göttingen: 262–74.Google Scholar

Eckert, A. (2016) Lucius Cornelius Sulla in der antiken Erinnerung. Jener Mörder, der sich Felix nannte (Millennium-Studien/Millennium Studies 60). Berlin.Google Scholar

Eder, W. (1990) ‘Augustus and the power of tradition: the Augustan principate as binding link between Republic and Empire’, in Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate, eds. Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M.. Berkeley, CA: 71–122.Google Scholar

Eder, W. (1991) ‘Who rules? Power and participation in Athens and Rome’, in City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval ltaly: Athens and Rome, Florence and Venice, eds. Molho, A., Raaflaub, K. A. and Emlen, J.. Stuttgart: 241–7.Google Scholar

Eilers, C. F. (2002) Roman Patrons of Greek Cities. Oxford.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Engels, D. (2007) Das römische Vorzeichenwesen (753–27 v. Chr.). Quellen, Terminologie, Kommentar, historische Entwicklung (Potsdamer altertumswissenschaftliche Beiträge 22). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Epstein, D. F. (1987) Personal Enmity in Roman Politics, 218–43 B.C. London.Google Scholar

Erkelenz, D. (2001) Optimo Praesidi. Untersuchungen zu den Ehrenmonumenten für Amtsträger der römischen Provinzen in Republik und Kaiserzeit. Antiquitas Reihe 1 (Abhandlungen zur alten Geschichte 52). Bonn.Google Scholar

Erkell, H. (1952) Augustus, Felicitas, Fortuna. Lateinische Wortstudien. Göteborg.Google Scholar

Etcheto, H. (2002) Les Scipions: famille et pouvoir à Rome à l’époque républicaine (Scripta antiqua/Ausonius 45). Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Evans, E. C. (1935) ‘Roman descriptions of personal appearance in history and biography’, HSPh 46: 43–84.Google Scholar

Evans, E. C. (1950) ‘Physiognomics in the Roman Empire’, CJ 45: 277–82.Google Scholar

Evans, R. (2008) Utopia Antiqua: Reading of the Golden Age and Decline at Rome. London.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2013) Cicero’s Pro L. Murena Oratio. Oxford.Google Scholar

Faoro, D. (2011) Praefectus, procurator, praeses: genesi delle cariche presidiali equestri dell’Alto Impero Romano (Studi udinesi sul mondo antico 8). Florence.Google Scholar

Fears, J. R. (1981) ‘The theology of victory at Rome: approaches and problems’, ANRW II 17(2): 736–826.Google Scholar

Fehrle, R. (1983) Cato Uticensis (Impulse der Forschung 43). Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Fejfer, J. (2008) Roman Portraits in Context (Image and Context 2). Berlin.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (1982) ‘Le idee politiche a Roma nell’ epoca reppubblicana’, in Storia delle idee politiche, economiche e sociali, vol. I: L’antichità classica, ed. Firpo, L.. Turin: 723–804.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (1991) ‘Le statut des cités libres dans l’empire romain à la lumière des inscriptions de Claros’, CRAI 1991: 557–77 (= Ferrary, J.-L. (2017): 161–80).Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (1997a) ‘Optimates et populares: le problème du role de l’idéologie dans la politique’, in Die späte römische Republik: La fin de la république romaine: un débat franco-allemand d’histoire et d’historiographie, eds. Bruhns, H., David, J.-M. and Nippel, W. (Collection de l’Ecole française de Rome 235). Rome: 221–31.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (1997b) ‘De l’évergétisme hellénistique à l’évergétisme romain’, in Actes du X^e Congrès International d’épigraphie grecque et latine, Nîmes 1992, eds. Christol, M. and Masson, O. (Historie ancienne et médiévale 42). Paris: 199–225 (= Ferrary, J.-L. (2017): 197–228).Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (2001) ‘La legislation de ambitu de Sulla à Auguste’, in Iuris vincula: studi in onore di Mario Talamanca, vol. III. Naples: 161–98 (= Ferrary, J.-L. (ed.) (2012) Recherches sur les lois comitiales et sur le droit public romain (Pubblicazioni del CEDANT 10). Pavia: 435–62).Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (2005) ‘Les Grecs des cités et l’obtention de la ciuitas Romana’, in Citoyenneté et participation à la basse époque hellénistique: actes de la table ronde des 22 et 23 mai 2004, Paris, BNF, organisée par le groupe de recherche dirigé par Philippe Gauthier, de l’UMR 8585 (Centre Gustave Glotz), eds. Fröhlich, P. and Müller, C. (Hautes études du monde gréco-romain 35). Geneva: 51–75 (= Ferrary, J.-L. (2017): 267–86).Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (2017) Rome et le monde grec: choix d’écrits (Epigraphica 9). Paris.Google Scholar

Fish, J. (2011) ‘Not all politicians are Sisyphus: what Roman Epicureans were taught about politics’, in Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, eds. Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R.. Cambridge: 72–104.Google Scholar

Flaig, E. (1995) ‘Entscheidung und Konsens. Zu den Feldern der politischen Kommunikation zwischen Aristokratie und Plebs’, in Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik, ed. Jehne, M.. (Historia Einzelschriften 96). Stuttgart: 77–127.Google Scholar

Flaig, E. (1997) ‘Zwingende Gesten in der römischen Politik’, in Neue Blicke. Historische Anthropologie in der Praxis, eds. Chvojka, E., van Dülmen, R. and Jung, Y.. Vienna: 33–50.Google Scholar

Flaig, E. (1998) ‘War die römische Volksversammlung ein Entscheidungsorgan? Institution und soziale Praxis’, in Institutionen und Ereignis. Über historische Praktiken und Vorstellungen gesellschaftlichen Ordnens, eds. Blänkner, R. and Jussen, B. (Veröffentlichungen des Max-Planck-Instituts für Geschichte 138). Göttingen: 49–73.Google Scholar

Flaig, E. (2004) Ritualisierte Politik. Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft im Alten Rom. (Historische Semantik 1). Göttingen.Google Scholar

Flamerie de Lachapelle, G. (2011) Clementia: recherches sur la notion de clémence à Rome du début du I^er siècle a.C. à la mort d’Auguste (Scripta antiqua/Ausonius 33). Paris.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (1995) ‘Fabulae praetextae in context: when were plays on contemporary subjects performed in republican Rome?’, CQ 45: 170–90.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (1996) Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2011) Roman Republics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2013) ‘Beyond the contio: political communication in the tribunate of Tiberius Gracchus’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. E. W. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 315–28: 85–100.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2014) Consensus and Community in Republican Rome (Todd Memorial Lecture 20). Sydney.Google Scholar

Fotheringham, L. S. (2013) Persuasive Language in Cicero’s Pro Milone: A Close Reading and Commentary (BICS Suppl. 121). London.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1989) ‘Lucretius and politics’, in Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, eds. Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 120–50.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (1995) ‘Greek magic, Greek religion’, ICS 20: 1–22 (= Buxton, R. G. B. (ed.) (2000) Oxford Readings in Greek Religion. Oxford: 317–43).Google Scholar

Fraccaro, P. (1910) ‘Catoniana’, in Studi Storici per ‘l´antichità’ classica, vol. III, ed. Pais, E.. Pisa: 241–85 (= Fraccaro, P. (1956): 227–56).Google Scholar

Fraccaro, P. (1911a), ‘Ricerche storiche e letterarie sulla censura del 184/183 (M. Porcio Catone L. Valerio Flacco)’, in Studi Storici per ‘l´antichità’ classica, vol. IV, ed. Pais, E.. Pisa: 1–139 (= Fraccaro, P. (1956): 417–508).Google Scholar

Fraccaro, P. (1911b) ‘I processi degli Scipioni’, in Studi Storici per ‘l´antichità’ classica, vol. IV, ed. Pais, E.. Pisa: 217–414 (= Fraccaro, P. (1956): 263–392).Google Scholar

Fraccaro, P. (1934) ‘Catone il Censore in Tito Livio’, in Studi liviani, eds. Columba, G. M. et al. Rome: 209–36 (= Fraccaro, P. (1956): 115–37).Google Scholar

Fraccaro, P. (1939) ‘Ancora sui processi degli Scipioni’, Athenaeum 27: 3–26 (= Fraccaro, P. (1956): 393–415).Google Scholar

Fraccaro, P. (1956) Opuscula, vol. I: Scritti di carattere generale; studi catoniani; i processi degli Scipioni. Pavia.Google Scholar

Franklin, J. L. (1980) Pompeii: The Electoral Programmata, Campaigns and Politics, A.D. 71–79 (Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 28). Rome.Google Scholar

Franklin, J. L. (2001) Pompeis Difficile Est: Studies in the Political Life of Imperial Pompeii. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Frazel, T. D. (2004) ‘The composition and circulation of Cicero’s In Verrem’, CQ 54: 128–42.Google Scholar

Frazel, T. D. (2009) The Rhetoric of Cicero’s In Verrem (Hypomnemata 179). Göttingen.Google Scholar

Frisch, H. (1946) Cicero’s Fight for the Republic: The Historical Background of Cicero’s Philippics (Humanitas 1). Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Frolov, R. M. (2013) ‘Public meetings in ancient Rome: definitions of the contiones in the sources’, SPFB(klas) 18: 75–84.Google Scholar

Fussl, M. (1980) ‘Epikureismus im Umkreis Caesars’, in Symmicta philologica Salisburgensia Georgio Pfligersdorffer sexagenario oblata, eds. Dalfen, J., Forstner, K., Fussl, M. and Speyer, W. (Filologia e critica 33). Rome: 61–80.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1981) ‘Ricchezza e classe dirigente romana fra III e I sec. a. Cr.’, RSI 93: 541–58 (= Gabba, E. (1988): 27–44).Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1985) ‘Arricchimento e ascesa sociale in Plauto e Terenzio’, Index 13: 5–15 (= Gabba, E. (1988): 69–82).Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1988) Del buon uso della ricchezza: saggi di storia economica e sociale del mondo antico (Saggi 7). Milan.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1990a) ‘Il tentativo dei Gracchi’, in Storia di Roma, vol. II: L’impero mediterraneo 1, La repubblica imperiale, eds. Momigliano, A. and Schiavone, A.. Turin: 671–89.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1990b) ‘Dallo stato-città allo stato municipale’, in Storia di Roma, vol. II: L’impero mediterraneo 1, La repubblica imperiale, eds. Momigliano, A. and Schiavone, A.. Turin: 697–714.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (2000) Roma arcaica: storia e storiografia (Storia e letteratura 205). Rome.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P. (2007) Thinking about Property: From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution (Ideas in Context 90). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gaudemet, J. (1964) ‘Maiestas populi Romani’, in Synteleia Vincenzo Arangio-Ruiz, vol. II, eds. Guarino, A. and Labruna, L. (Biblioteca di Labeo 2). Naples: 699–709.Google Scholar

Geffcken, K. A. (1973) Comedy in the Pro Caelio (Mnemosyne Supp. 30). Leiden.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (1973) ‘The last Servilii Caepiones of the Republic’, AncSoc 4: 143–56.Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. (1963) Kleine Schriften. Zum fünfundsiebzigsten Geburtstag von Matthias Gelzer, vol. II, eds. Strasburger, H. and Meier, C.. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. (1968) Caesar: Politician and Statesman, trans. Needham, P.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. (1969) The Nobility of the Roman Republic, trans. Seager, R.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. (1984) Pompeius. Lebensbild eines Römers (2nd edn, rev. Hermann-Otto, E.). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Gilbert, N. (2015) Among Friends: Cicero and the Epicureans. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2011) Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar

Giovannini, A. (1983) Consulare imperium (Schweizerische Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 16). Basel.Google Scholar

Giunti, P. (2004) Consors vitae: matrimonio e ripudio in Roma antica (Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di Giurisprudenza/Università di Firenze 87). Milan.Google Scholar

Gold, B. K. (1985) ‘Pompey and Theophanes of Mytilene’, AJPh 106: 312–27.Google Scholar

Gold, B. K. (1987) Literary Patronage in Greece and Rome. London.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. (1999) ‘Imagining Greek and Roman Magic’, in Witchcraft and Magic in Europe: Ancient Greece and Rome, eds. Ankarloo, B. and Clark, S. (Athlone History of Witchcraft and Magic in Europe 2). Philadelphia, PA: 159–276.Google Scholar

Gotoff, H. (1993) ‘Oratory: the art of illusion’, HSPh 95: 289–313.Google Scholar

Gotter, U. (1996) Der Diktator ist tot! Politik in Rom zwischen den Iden des März und der Begründung des Zweiten Triumvirats (Historia Einzelschriften 110). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. M. (1992) The Triumviral Narratives of Appian and Cassius Dio. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Graf, F. (1997) Magic in the Ancient World, trans. Philip, F. (Revealing Antiquity 10). London.Google Scholar

Gray, B. (2015) Stasis and Stability: Exile, the Polis, and Political Thought, c. 404–146 BC. Oxford.Google Scholar

Greenidge, A. H. J. (1901) The Legal Procedure of Cicero’s Time. Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1973) ‘The tribune C. Cornelius’, JRS 63: 196–213.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1989) ‘Philosophy, politics and politicians at Rome’, in Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, eds. Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 1–37.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1995) ‘Philosophical badinage in Cicero’s letters to his friends’, in Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, ed. Powell, J. G. F.. Oxford: 325–46.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1997) ‘From Aristotle to Atticus: Cicero and Matius on friendship’, in Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome, eds. Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. T.. Oxford: 86–109.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (2001) ‘Piso, Cicero and their audience’, in Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie, eds. Auvray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D. (Etudes de littérature ancienne 12). Paris: 85–99.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (2003) ‘Clementia after Caesar: from politics to philosophy’, in Caesar against Liberty? Perspectives on His Autocracy, eds. Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 11, ARCA: Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers and Monographs 43). Cambridge: 157–82.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J. (eds.) (1989) Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J. G. (1991) The Divine Verdict: A Study of Divine Judgement in the Ancient Religions (Studies in the History of Religions 52). Leiden.Google Scholar

Grillo, L. (2012) The Art of Caesar’s Bellum Civile: Literature, Ideology, and Community. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1965) ‘The Lex Varia’, JRS 55: 59–73.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1966) ‘Political prosecutions in the 90’s B.C.’, Historia 15: 32–64.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1969) ‘The consular elections for 53 B.C.’, in Hommages à Marcel Renard, vol. II, ed. Bibauw, J. (Coll. Latomus 102). Brussels: 311–21.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1971) ‘Pompey, Metellus Pius, and the trials of 70–69 B.C.: the perils of schematism’, AJPh 92: 1–16.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1977) ‘M. Licinius Crassus: a review article’, AJAH 2: 117–28.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1995) The Last Generation of the Roman Republic (2nd edn). Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Grunewald, T. (2004) Bandits in the Roman Empire: Myth and Reality, trans. Drinkwater, J.. London.Google Scholar

Gundel, H. G. (1963) ‘Der Begriff maiestas im politischen Denken der römischen Republik’, Historia 12: 283–320.Google Scholar

Gurd, S. (2010) ‘Verres and the scene of rewriting’, Phoenix 64: 80–101.Google Scholar

Haimson Lushkov, A. (2015) Magistracy and the Historiography of the Roman Republic: Politics in Prose. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hanell, K. (1945), ‘Bemerkungen zu der politischen Terminologie des Sallustius’, Eranos 43: 263–76.Google Scholar

Harders, A.-C. (2007a) ‘Die verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen der Servilia, Ehefrau des L. Licinius Lucullus: Schwester oder Nichte des Cato Uticensis?’, Historia 56: 453–61.Google Scholar

Harders, A.-C. (2007b) ‘Die Identität der Iunia, Δέκμου θυγάτηρ und Ehefrau des P. Servilius Isauricus (cos. 48): Überlegungen zu BMusImp 3:3,1, PH 206 und IG XII Suppl. 60’, Klio 89: 403–16.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2007) Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harvey, P. B. (1982) ‘Cicero, Consius and Capua: II. Cicero and M. Brutus’ colony’, Athenaeum 60: 145–71.Google Scholar

Haug, I. (1947) ‘Der römische Bundesgenossenkrieg 91–88 v. Chr. bei Titus Livius’, WJA 2: 100–39.Google Scholar

Heftner, H. (2006) ‘Der Beginn von Sullas Proskriptionen’, Tyche 21: 33–52.Google Scholar

Hellegouarc’h, J. (1972) Le Vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République (2nd edn). Paris.Google Scholar

Hiebel, D. (2009) Rôles institutionnel et politique de la contio sous la République romaine (287–49 av. J.C.). Paris.Google Scholar

Hillard, T. W. (2013) ‘Graffiti’s engagement: the political graffiti of the late Roman Republic’, in Written Space in the Latin West, 200 BC to AD 300, eds. Sears, G., Keegan, P. and Laurence, R.. London: 105–22.Google Scholar

Hinard, F. (1985) Les proscriptions de la Rome républicaine (Collection de l’Ecole française de Rome 83). Rome.Google Scholar

Hinard, F. (1990) ‘Solidarités familiales et ruptures à l’époque des guerres civiles et de la proscription’, in Parenté et stratégies familiales dans l´antiquité romaine: actes de la table ronde des 2–4 octobre 1986 (Paris, Maison des Sciences des l’homme), eds. Andreau, J. and Bruhns, H. (Collection de l’Ecole française de Rome 129). Rome: 555–70.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hodgson, L. (2017) Res Publica and the Roman Republic: ‘Without Body or Form’. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1987) Die Entstehung der Nobilität. Studien zur sozialen und politischen Geschichte der Römischen Republik im 4. Jhdt. v. Chr. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1995) ‘Oratoris maxima scaena: Reden vor dem Volk in der politischen Kultur der Republik’, in Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik, ed. Jehne, M. (Historia Einzelschriften 96). Stuttgart: 11–49 (= Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2004), Senatus populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik: Dimensionen und Deutungen. Wiesbaden: 219–56).Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1997) [Commentary on Ferrary (1997b)], in Die späte römische Republik: La fin de la république romaine: un débat franco-allemand d’histoire et d’historiographie, eds. Bruhns, H., David, J.-M. and Nippel, W. (Collection de l’Ecole française de Rome 235). Rome: 232–5.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2001) ‘Fact(ions) or fiction? Friedrich Münzer and the aristocracy of the Roman Republic – then and now’ [review of Münzer (1999)], IJCT 8: 92–105.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2003) ‘Ikonen der Virtus. Exemplarische Helden(-taten) im monumentalen Gedächtnis der römischen Republik’, in Modelli eroici dall’antichità alla cultura europea, ed. Barzanò, A. (Alle radici della casa comune europea 4, Monografie/Centro ricerche e documentazione sull’antichità classica 23). Rome: 213–37.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2004a) Rekonstruktionen einer Republik. Die politische Kultur des antiken Rom und die Forschung der letzten Jahrzehnte (Historische Zeitschrift 38). Munich.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2004b) Senatus populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik: Dimensionen und Deutungen. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2010) Reconstructing the Roman Republic: An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research, trans. Heitmann-Gordon, H.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2011a) ‘The Roman Republic as theatre of power: the consuls as leading actors’, in Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, eds. Beck, H., Duplá, A. and Jehne, M.. Cambridge: 161–81.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2011b) ‘What’s in a text? Reconstructing the Roman Republic: approaches and aims once again’, BICS 54: 115–24.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2013) ‘Friends, Romans, countrymen: addressing the Roman people and the rhetoric of inclusion’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. E. W. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 11–28.Google Scholar

Hopkins, K. and Burton, G. (1983) ‘Political Succession in the late Republic (249–50 BC)’, in Death and Renewal, ed. Hopkins, K. (Sociological Studies in Roman History 2). Cambridge: 31–119.Google Scholar

Housman, A. E. (1883) ‘Ibis 539’, JPh 12: 167.Google Scholar

Howe, H. M. (1948) ‘Three groups of Roman Epicureans’, TAPhA 79: 341–2.Google Scholar

Howe, H. M. (1951) ‘Amafinius, Lucretius and Cicero’, AJPh 72: 57–62.Google Scholar

Hübner, W. (1970) Dirae im römischen Epos. Über das Verhältnis von Vogeldämonen und Prodigien (Spudasmata 21). Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Humm, M. (2005) Appius Claudius Caecus: la République accomplie (Bibliothèque des Ecoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 322). Rome.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2001) ‘The date of the De rerum natura’, CQ 51: 150–62.Google Scholar

Itgenshorst, T. (2005) Tota illa pompa. Der Triumph in der römischen Republik (Hypomnemata 161). Göttingen.Google Scholar

Jahn, J. (1970) Interregnum und Wahldiktatur (Frankfurter althistorische Studien 3). Kallmünz.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. (2000) ‘Jovialität und Freiheit: zur Institutionalität der Beziehungen zwischen Ober- und Unterschichten in der römischen Republik’, in Mos maiorum. Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik, eds. Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. (Historia Einzelschriften 141). Stuttgart: 207–35.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. (2006a) ‘Methods, models and historiography’, in A Companion to the Roman Republic, eds. Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R.. Oxford: 3–28.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. (2006b) ‘Who attended Roman assemblies? Some remarks on political participation in the Roman Republic’, in Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo, eds. Marco Simón, F., Pina Polo, F. and Remesal Rodríguez, J. (Instrumenta 21). Barcelona: 221–34.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. (2011) ‘Blaming the people in front of the people: restraint and outbursts of orators in Roman contiones’, in Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, eds. Corvino, R. and Smith, C. J.. Swansea: 111–25.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. (2013a) ‘Der römische Senat als Hüter des Gemeinsinns’, in Gemeinsinn und Gemeinwohl in der Römischen Antike, eds. Jehne, M. and Lundgreen, C.. Stuttgart: 23–50.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. (2013b) ‘Feeding the plebs with words: the significance of senatorial public oratory in the small world of Roman politics’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. E. W. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 49–62.Google Scholar

Johnston, P. D. (2008) The Military Consilium in Republican Rome (Gorgias Dissertations: Classics 27.4). Piscataway, NJ.Google Scholar

Johnston, S. I. (2004) Religions of the Ancient World: A Guide. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (2000) ‘Diodoros Pasparos revisited’, Chiron 30: 1–14.Google Scholar

Jucker, I. (2006) Skulpturen der Antiken-Sammlung Ennetwies (vol. II; Monumenta Artis Romanae 36). Mainz.Google Scholar

Kany-Turpin, J. (1999) ‘Fonction de la vérité dans un énoncé augural: le paradoxe du menteur Ateius Capito’, in Conceptions latines du sens et de la signification: colloque du centre Alfred Ernout, Université de Paris IV, 4, 5 et 6 juin 1996, eds. Baratin, M. and Moussy, C. (Lingua latina: recherches linguistiques du Centre Alfred Ernout 5). Paris: 255–66.Google Scholar

Kany-Turpin, J. (2003) ‘La divination augurale romaine: une science des signes?’, in Ars et ratio: sciences, art et métiers dans la philosophie hellénistique et romaine. Actes du colloque international organisé à Créteil, Fontenay et Paris du 16 au 18 octobre 1997, eds. Lévy, C., Besnier, B. and Gigandet, A. (Coll. Latomus 273). Brussels: 61–74.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (2006) Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Keaveney, A. (1983) ‘Sulla and the gods’, in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, vol. III, ed. Deroux, C. (Coll. Latomus 180). Brussels: 44–79.Google Scholar

Keaveney, A. (2005) Sulla: The Last Republican (2nd edn). London.Google Scholar

Keppie, L. (1984) The Making of the Roman Army: From Republic to Empire. London.Google Scholar

Kippenberg, H. (1997) ‘Magic in Roman civil discourse’, in Envisioning Magic: A Princeton Seminar and Symposium, eds. Schäfer, P. and Kippenberg, H. G. (Studies in the History of Religions 75). Leiden: 137–65.Google Scholar

Kondratieff, E. (2003) Popular Power in Action: Tribunes of the Plebs in the Later Republic. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Kondratieff, E. (2012) ‘Tribuni plebis’, in The Encyclopedia of Ancient History, eds. Bagnall, R. S., Brodersen, K., Champion, C. B., Erskine, A. and Huebner, S. R.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Konrad, C. F. (2004) ‘Vellere signa’, in Augusto augurio: rerum humanarum et divinarum commentationes in honorem Jerzy Linderski, ed. Konrad, C. F.. Stuttgart: 169–203.Google Scholar

Konrad, C. F. (2008) ‘Ager Romanus at Messana?’, CQ 58: 349–53.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1997) Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2005) ‘Clemency as a virtue’, CPh 100: 337–46.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. (1985) ‘Begriffsgeschichte und Sozialgeschichte’, in Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten (4th edn). Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Labarre, G. (1996) ‘Théophane et l’octroi de la liberté à Mytilène: question de méthode’, Tekmeria 2: 44–54.Google Scholar

Lange, C. H. (2013) ‘Triumph and civil war in the late Republic’, PBSR 81: 67–90.Google Scholar

Laurence, R. (1994) ‘Rumour and communication in Roman politics’, G&R 41: 62–74.Google Scholar

Leen, A. (2000) ‘The domus motif in Cicero’s Pro Caelio’, CJ 96: 141–62.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (2004) ‘The Pro Caelio and comedy’, CPh 99: 300–35.Google Scholar

Lenaghan, J. O. (1969) A Commentary on Cicero’s Oration De Haruspicum Responso (Studies in Classical Literature 5). The Hague.Google Scholar

Lepore, E. (1990a) ‘La crisi della “nobilitas” fra reazione e riforma’, in Storia di Roma, vol. II: ‘L’impero’ mediterraneo 1, La repubblica imperiale, eds. Momigliano, A. and Schiavone, A.. Turin: 737–58.Google Scholar

Lepore, E. (1990b) ‘La decisione politica e l’“auctoritas” senatoria: Pompeo, Cicerone, Cesare’, in Storia di Roma, vol. II: L’impero mediterraneo 1, La repubblica imperiale, eds. Momigliano, A. and Schiavone, A.. Turin: 759–88.Google Scholar

Leslie, R. J. (1950) The Epicureanism of Titus Pomponius Atticus. Unpublished PhD thesis. Columbia University, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (1993) Religion in Livy (Mnemosyne Suppl. 127). Leiden.Google Scholar

Lewis, R. G. (2006) Asconius: Commentaries on Speeches of Cicero. Oxford.Google Scholar

Libero, L. de (1992) Obstruktion. Politische Praktiken im Senat und in der Volksversammlung der römischen Republik (70–49 v. Chr.) (Hermes Einzelschriften 59). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1971) ‘Römischer Staat und Götterzeichen: zum Problem der obnuntiatio’, JUD 1969–1970: 309–22 (= Linderski, J. (1995): 444–57).Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1972) ‘The aedileship of Favonius, Curio the younger, and Cicero’s election to the augurate’, HSCP 76: 181–200 (= Linderski, J. (1995): 231–51).Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1983) ‘A witticism of Appuleius Saturninus’, RFIC III: 452–9 (= Linderski, J. (1995): 534–41).Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1986) ‘The augural law’, ANRW II, 16(3): 2146–312.Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1993) ‘Roman religion in Livy’, in Livius. Aspekte seines Werkes, ed. Schuller, W. (Xenia 31). Konstanz: 53–64 (= Linderski, J. (1995): 608–19).Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1995) Roman Questions: Selected Papers (Heidelberger althisto-rische Beiträge und epigraphische Studien 20). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1996a) ‘Q. Scipio Imperator’, in Imperium Sine Fine: T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic, ed. Linderski, J. (Historia Einzelschriften 105). Stuttgart: 145–85 (= Linderski, J. (2007): 130–74).Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1996b) ‘Cato maior in Aetolia’, in Transitions to Empire: Essays in Greco-Roman History, 360–146 B.C. in Honor of E. Badian, eds. Wallace, R. W. and Harris, E. M. (Oklahoma Series in Classical Culture 26). Norman, OK: 376–408 (= Linderski, J. (2007): 61–87).Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (2007) Roman Questions II: Selected Papers (Heidelberger althistorische Beiträge und epigraphische Studien 44). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Lindsay, H. (2009) Adoption in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Linke, B. (2005) Die römische Republik von den Gracchen bis Sulla. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (1974) ‘Cicero and Milo’, JRS 64: 62–78.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (1990) ‘Electoral bribery in the Roman Republic’, JRS 80: 1–16.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (1999a) Violence in Republican Rome (2nd edn). Oxford.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (1999b) The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (2008) Cicero as Evidence: A Historian’s Companion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (2009) ‘The assassination’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M. T.. Chichester: 72–82.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (2013) Plutarch: Demosthenes and Cicero. Oxford.Google Scholar

Liu, J. (2013) ‘Professional Associations’, in Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rome, ed. Erdkamp, P.. Cambridge: 352–68.Google Scholar

Lloyd, N. (1993) Stages of Life in Theatre, Film, and Television. New York.Google Scholar

Lo Cascio, E. (2001) ‘Il census a Roma e la sua evoluzione dall’età serviana alla prima età imperiale’, MEFRA 113: 565–603.Google Scholar

Lott, J. B. (2004) The Neighborhoods of Augustan Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mackay, C. S. (2000) ‘Sulla and the monuments: studies in his public persona’, Historia 49: 161–210.Google Scholar

Mackie, N. (1992) ‘Popularis ideology and popular politics at Rome in the first century BC’, RhM 135: 49–73.Google Scholar

MacMullen, R. (1980) ‘How many Romans voted?’, Athenaeum 58: 454–7.Google Scholar

Magdelain, A. (1964) ‘Auspicia ad patres redeunt’, in Hommages à Jean Bayet, eds. Renard, M. and Schilling, R. (Coll. Latomus 70). Brussels: 427–73 (= Magdelain, A. (1990) Jus Imperium Auctoritas: études de droit romain (Collection de l’École française de Rome 133). Rome: 341–83).Google Scholar

Magie, D. (1950) Roman Rule in Asia Minor: To the End of the Third Century after Christ (3 vols.). Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Magnino, D. (1984) Appiani Bellorum Civilium liber tertius (Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di lettere e filosofia dell’Università di Pavia 32). Florence.Google Scholar

Malcovati, E. (1929) ‘Favonius o Favorinus?’, Athenaeum 7: 216–23.Google Scholar

Malitz, J. (1987) ‘Die Kanzlei Caesars. Herrschaftsorganisation zwischen Republik und Prinzipat’, Historia 36: 51–72.Google Scholar

Mankin, D. (2011) Cicero: De Oratore Book III. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (2001) Fabulae praetextae. Spuren einer literarischen Gattung der Römer (Zetemata 108). Munich.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (2007) Cicero: Philippics 3–9 (2 vols.; Texte und Kommentare 30.1/2). Berlin.Google Scholar

Marache, R. (1967–88) Aulu-Gelle: Les nuits attiques (4 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar

Marco Simón, F. and Pina Polo, F. (2000) ‘Mario Gratidiano, los compita y la religiosidad popular a fines de la república’, Klio 82: 154–70.Google Scholar

Marquardt, J. (1881) Römische Staatsverwaltung (vol. I, 2nd edn; Handbuch der römischen Alterthümer von Joachim Marquardt und Theodor Mommsen 4). Leipzig.Google Scholar

Marshall, B. A. (1976) Crassus: A Political Biography. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Marshall, B. A. (1985) A Historical Commentary on Asconius. Columbia, MO.Google Scholar

Martin, P. M. (2000) ‘Sur quelques thèmes de l’éloquence popularis, notamment l’invective contre la passivité du people’, in Orateur, auditeurs, lecteurs: à propos de l’éloquence romaine à la fin de la République et au début du Principat. Actes de la table-ronde du 31 janvier 2000, eds. Achard, G. and Ledentu, M. (Collection du Centre d’études et de recherches sur l’Occident romain N.S. 21). Paris: 27–41.Google Scholar

Marx, F. (ed.) (1894) Incerti auctoris De Ratione Dicendi ad C. Herennium libri IV. Leipzig.Google Scholar

May, J. M. (1998) Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

May, J. M. (ed.) (2002) Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden.Google Scholar

McConnell, S. (2014) Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters. Cambridge.Google Scholar

McDermott, W. C. (1977) ‘The Verrine jury’, RhM 120: 64–76.Google Scholar

McDonald, W. F. (1929) ‘Clodius and the Lex Aelia Fufia’, JRS 19: 164–79.Google Scholar

Meier, C. (1968), ‘Die loca intercessionis bei Rogationen. Zugleich ein Beitrag zum Problem der Bedingungen der tribunicischen Intercession’, MH 25: 86–100.Google Scholar

Meier, C. (1980) Res publica amissa. Eine Studie zu Verfassung und Geschichte der späten römischen Republik (2nd edn). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Meyer, E. (1922) Caesars Monarchie und das Principat des Pompejus. Innere Geschichte Roms von 66 bis 44 v. Chr. (3rd edn). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Millar, F. (1986) ‘Politics, Persuasion and the People before the Social War (150–90 B.C.)’, JRS 76: 1–11.Google Scholar

Millar, F. (1998) The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic (Jerome Lectures 22). Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Millar, F. (2002a) The Roman Republic in Political Thought. London.Google Scholar

Millar, F. (2002b) ‘Politics, persuasion and the people before the Social War (150–90 BC)’, in Rome, the Greek World, and the East, vol. I: The Roman Republic and the Augustan Revolution, ed. Millar, F.. Chapel Hill, NC: 143–61.Google Scholar

Milnor, K. (2014) Graffiti and the Literary Landscape in Roman Pompeii. Oxford.Google Scholar

Miners, N. J. (1958) ‘The Lex Sempronia ne quis iudicio circumveniatur’, CQ 8: 241–3.Google Scholar

Mirecki, P. and Meyer, M. (eds.) (2002) Magic and Ritual in the Ancient World (Religions in the Graeco-Roman World 141). Leiden.Google Scholar

Mitchell, T. N. (1979) Cicero: The Ascending Years. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1940) Review of Syme (1939), JRS 30: 75–80 (= Momigliano, A. (1960) Secondo contributo alla storia degli studi classici (Storia e Lett. 77). Rome: 407–16).Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1989) Roma arcaica. Florence.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. and Schiavone, A. (eds.) (1990) Storia di Roma, vol. II: L’impero mediterraneo 1, La repubblica imperiale. Turin.Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. (1857) Römische Geschichte, vol. III: Von Sullas Tod bis zur Schlacht von Thapsus (2nd edn). Berlin.Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. (1887–8) Römisches Staatsrecht (3 vols., 3rd edn; Handbuch der römischen Alterthümer von Joachim Marquardt und Theodor Mommsen 1–3). Leipzig.Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. (1899) Römisches Strafrecht (Systematisches Handbuch der deutschen Rechtswissenschaft 1.4). Leipzig.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. D. (1990) ‘The death of Cinna the poet’, CQ 40: 558–9.Google Scholar

Morrell, K. (2014) ‘Cato and the courts in 54 B.C.’, CQ 64: 669–81.Google Scholar

Morrell, K. (2017) Pompey, Cato, and the Governance of the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. (2004) Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. (2012) ‘Political graffiti in the late Roman Republic: “Hidden transcripts” and “Common knowledge”’, in Politische Kommunikation und öffentliche Meinung in der antiken Welt, ed. Kuhn, C. T.. Heidelberg: 191–217.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. (2013) ‘Cultural hegemony and the communicative power of the Roman elite’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. E. W. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 315–28: 29–47.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. (2014) ‘Persuading the people in the Roman participatory context’, in A Companion to Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic, ed. Hammer, D.. Chichester: 294–310.Google Scholar

Mouritsen, H. (2001) Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mouritsen, H. (2011) The Freedman in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mueller, H.-F. (2004) ‘Nocturni coetus in 494 BC’, in Augusto augurio: rerum humanarum et divinarum commentationes in honorem Jerzy Linderski, ed. Konrad, C. F.. Stuttgart: 77–88.Google Scholar

Mulgan, R. G. (1979) ‘Was Caesar an Epicurean? Sallust BC 51.20’, CW 72: 337–9.Google Scholar

Muñiz Coello, J. (2003) ‘Ap. Claudio Pulcro, cónsul del 54 a.C.’, Gerión 21: 205–28.Google Scholar

Muntz, C. E. (2017) Diodorus Siculus and the World of the Late Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Münzer, F. (1920) Römische Adelsparteien und Adelsfamilien. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Münzer, F. (1999) Roman Aristocratic Parties and Families, trans. Ridley, T.. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Murray, O. (1965) ‘Philodemus on the good king according to Homer’, JRS 55: 161–82.Google Scholar

Nicholson, J. (1994) ‘The delivery and confidentiality of Cicero’s letters’, CJ 90: 33–63.Google Scholar

Nicolet, C. (1988) Le métier de citoyen dans la Rome républicaine (2nd edn). Paris.Google Scholar

Nicolet, C. (1993) ‘The citizen: the political man’, in The Romans, ed. Giardina, A., trans. Cochrane, L. G.. Chicago: 16–54.Google Scholar

Nippel, W. (1980) Mischverfassungstheorie und Verfassungsrealität in Antike und früher Neuzeit (Geschichte und Gesellschaft, Bochumer historische Schriften 21). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Nippel, W. (1988) Aufruhr und ‘Polizei’ in der römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Nippel, W. (1995) Public Order in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. (1961) M. Tulli Ciceronis in L. Calpurnium Pisonem. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nörr, D. (1963) ‘Origo: Studien zur Orts-, Stadt- und Reichszugehörigkeit in der Antike’, RHD 31: 525–600.Google Scholar

North, J. A. (1967) The Inter-Relation of State Religion and Politics in Roman Public Life from the End of the Second Punic War to the Time of Sulla. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

North, J. A. (1990a) ‘Democratic politics in republican Rome’, P&P 126: 3–21.Google Scholar

North, J. A. (1990b) ‘Diviners and divination at Rome’, in Pagan Priests: Religion and Power in the Ancient World, ed. Beard, M. and North, J. A.. London: 51–71.Google Scholar

North, J. A. (2000) ‘Prophet and text in the third century B.C.’, in Religion in Archaic and Republican Rome and Italy. Evidence and Experience, eds. Bispham, E. and Smith, C. (New Perspectives on the Ancient World 2). Edinburgh: 92–107.Google Scholar

O’Gorman, E. (2009) ‘Intertextuality and historiography’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians, ed. Feldherr, A.. Cambridge: 231–42.Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. (1998) ‘Venus or the muse as “ally” (Lucr. 1.24, Simon. Frag. Eleg. 11.20–22 W)’, CPh 93: 69–74.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, T. (2010) Epicureanism. Durham, NC.Google Scholar

O’Neill, P. (2001) A Culture of Sociability: Popular Speech in Ancient Rome. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Oesterreicher, W. (1997) ‘Types of orality in text’, in Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text, eds. Bakker, E. J. and Kahane, A.. Cambridge, MA: 190–214.Google Scholar

Orlin, E. M. (1997) Temples, Religion and Politics in the Roman Republic (Mnemosyne Suppl. 164). Leiden.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. (2006) Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. (2014) Turia: A Roman Woman’s Civil War. Oxford.Google Scholar

Östenberg, I. (2009) Staging the World: Spoils, Captives, and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pabst, A. (1997) Comitia imperii. Ideelle Grundlagen des römischen Kaisertums. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Panciera, S. (1980) ‘Catilina e Catone su due coppette romane’, in Φιλίας χάριν. Miscellanea di studi classici in onore di Eugenio Manni (vol. V, eds. Fontana, M. J., Piraino, M. T. and Rizzo, F. P.). Rome: 1637–61.Google Scholar

Paratore, E. (1960) L’epicureismo e la sua diffusione nel mondo latino (Quaderni della RCCM 1). Rome.Google Scholar

Parker, R. W. (1991) ‘Potamon of Mytilene and his family’, ZPE 85: 115–29.Google Scholar

Patterson, M. L. (1942) ‘Rome’s choice of magistrates during the Hannibalic War’, TAPhA 73: 319–40.Google Scholar

Pease, A. S. (1920) M. Tulli Ciceronis De Divinatione. Liber Primus. Urbana, IL.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1989) ‘Plutarch: Roman heroes and Greek culture’, in Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, eds. Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 199–232.Google Scholar

Perelli, L. (1982) Il movimento popolare nell’ultimo secolo della Repubblica (Historia politica philosophica 11). Turin.Google Scholar

Pérez Castro, L. (2005) ‘Naturaleza y composición del sermo castrensis latino’, Emerita 73: 73–96.Google Scholar

Perrin, B. (1921) Plutarch’s Lives, vol. X. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Phillips, E. J. (1970) ‘Cicero and the prosecution of C. Manilius’, Latomus 29: 595–607.Google Scholar

Pieri, G. (1968) ‘L´histoire’ du cens jusqu’à la fin de la République romaine (Publications de l’Institut de droit romain de l’Université de Paris 25). Paris.Google Scholar

Pignatelli, A. (1999) ‘La lex Licinia de sumptu minuendo’, in Epigrafia e territorio, politica et societa: temi di antichità romane, vol. V, ed. Pani, M. (Documenti e studi 24). Bari: 251–62.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. (1989) Las contiones civiles y militares en Roma. Saragossa.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. (1996) Contra arma verbis. Der Redner vor dem Volk in der späten römischen Republik, trans. Liess, E. (Heidelberger althistorische Beiträge und epigraphische Studien 22). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. (2004) ‘Die nützliche Erinnerung. Geschichtsschreibung, mos maiorum und die römische Identität’, Historia 53: 147–72.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. (2006) ‘The tyrant must die: preventive tyrannicide in Roman political thought’, in Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo, eds. Simón, F. M., Pina Polo, F. and Rodríguez, J. R. (Collecció Instrumenta 21). Barcelona: 71–101.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. (2009) ‘Eminent corpses: Roman aristocracy’s passing from life to history’, in Formae mortis: el tránsito de la vida a la muerte en las sociedades antiguas, eds. Marco Simón, F., Pina Polo, F. and Remesal Rodríguez, J. (Collecció Instrumenta 30). Barcelona: 89–100.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. (2010) ‘Frigidus rumor: the creation of a (negative) public image in Rome’, in Private and Public Lies: The Discours of Despotism and Deceit in the Graeco-Roman World, eds. Turner, A., On Chong-Gossard, J. H. K. and Vervaet, F. J. (Impact of Empire 11). Leiden: 75–90.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. (2011a) The Consul at Rome: The Civil Functions of the Consuls in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. (2011b) ‘Public speaking at Rome: a question of auctoritas’, in The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World, ed. Peachin, M.. Oxford: 286–303.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. (2012) ‘Contio, auctoritas and freedom of speech in Republican Rome’, in Rome, a City and Its Empire in Perspective: The Impact of the Roman World through Fergus Millar’s Research [Rome, une cité impériale en jeu: l’impact du monde romain selon Fergus Millar], ed. Benoist, S. (Impact of Empire 16). Leiden: 45–58.Google Scholar

Pittenger, M. R. P. (2008) Contested Triumphs: Politics, Pageantry, and Performance in Livy’s Republican Rome. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Prag, J. R. W. (2013) ‘Provincials, patrons, and the rhetoric of repetundae’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. E. W. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 267–83.Google Scholar

Preston, T. (2001) The President and His Inner Circle: Leadership Style and the Advisory Process in Foreign Affairs. Chichester.Google Scholar

Purcell, N. (1983) ‘The apparitores: a study in social mobility’, PBSR 51: 125–73.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. A. (1974) Dignitatis Contentio. Studien zur Motivation und politischen Taktik im Bürgerkrieg zwischen Caesar und Pompeius (Vestigia 20). Munich.Google Scholar

Raggi, A. (2001) ‘Senatus consultum de Asclepiade Clazomenio sociisque’, ZPE 135: 73–116.Google Scholar

Raggi, A. (2010) ‘The first Roman citizens among Eastern dynasts and kings’, in Kingdoms and Principalities in the Roman Near East, eds. Kaizer, T. and Margherita, F. (Oriens et occidens 19). Stuttgart: 81–97.Google Scholar

Rambaud, M. (1969) ‘César et l’épicurisme d’après les Commentaires’, in Association Guillaume Budé: actes du VIII^e Congrès (Paris, 5–10 avril 1968). Paris: 411–35.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T. (2004) ‘Did Julius Caesar temporarily banish Mark Antony from his inner circle?’, CQ 54: 161–73.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T. (2010) Cicero: Philippics I–II. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, S. W. (2003) Public Portents in Republican Rome (Analecta Romana Instituti Danici Suppl. 34). Rome.Google Scholar

Rawson, E. (1974) ‘Religion and politics in the late second century B.C. at Rome’, Phoenix 28: 193–212.Google Scholar

Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. London.Google Scholar

Rawson, E. (1989) ‘Roman rulers and the philosophic adviser’, in Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, eds. Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 233–58.Google Scholar

Richardson, J. H. (2011) ‘L. Junius Brutus the patrician and the political allegiance of Q. Aelius Tubero’, CPh 106: 155–60.Google Scholar

Richardson, J. H. (2012) The Fabii and the Gauls: Studies in Historical Thought and Historiography in Republican Rome (Historia Einzelschriften 222). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. (1997) ‘Did the Romans believe in their verdicts?’, Rhetorica 15: 235–51.Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. (1999) Crime and Community in Ciceronian Rome. Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Rives, J. B. (2003) ‘Magic in Roman law: the reconstruction of a crime’, ClAnt 22: 313–39.Google Scholar

Robb, M. A. (2010) Beyond Populares and Optimates: Political Language in the Late Republic (Historia Einzelschriften 213). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Robert, L. (1969) ‘Théophane de Mytilène à Constantinople’, CRAI 113: 42–64 (= Robert, L. (1989) Opera Minora Selecta, vol. V. Amsterdam: 561–83).Google Scholar

Robert, L. and Robert, J. (1989) Claros, vol. I: Décrets hellénistiques. Paris.Google Scholar

Roller, D. W. (1970) ‘Gaius Memmius: patron of Lucretius’, CPh 65: 246–8.Google Scholar

Roller, M. B. (2004) ‘Exemplarity in Roman culture: the cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia’, CPh 99: 1–56.Google Scholar

Roller, M. B. (2010) ‘Demolished houses, monumentality, and memory in Roman culture’, ClAnt 29: 117–80.Google Scholar

Rosenstein, N. S. (1990) Imperatores Victi: Military Defeat and Aristocratic Competition in the Middle and Late Republic. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Rosillo-López, C. (2007) ‘“Temo a los troyanos”: rumores y habladurías en la Roma republicana’, Polis 19: 113–34.Google Scholar

Rosillo-López, C. (2010) La corruption à la fin de la République romaine (IIe–Ier s. av. J.-C.): aspects politiques et financiers (Historia Einzelschriften 200). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Rosillo-López, C. (2017a) Public Opinion and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rosillo-López, C. (2017b) ‘Popular public opinion in a nutshell: nicknames and non-elite political culture in the late Republic’, in Popular Culture in the Ancient World, ed. Grig, L.. Cambridge: 91–106.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2007) ‘Live Unnoticed’ Λάθε βιώσας: On the Vicissitudes of an Epicurean Doctrine (Philosophia antiqua 111). Leiden.Google Scholar

Rotondi, G. (1912) Leges Publicae Populi Romani: elenco cronologico con una introduzione sull’attività legislativa dei comizi romani. Milan.Google Scholar

Ruebel, J. S. (1979) ‘The trial of Milo in 52 B.C.: a chronological study’, TAPhA 109: 231–49.Google Scholar

Rüpke, J. (1990) Domi militiae. Die religiöse Konstruktion des Krieges in Rom. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Russell, A. (2013) ‘Speech, competition, and collaboration: tribunician politics and the development of popular ideology’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. E. W. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 101–16.Google Scholar

Russell, A. (2015) ‘The tribunate of the plebs as a magistracy of crisis’, in Deformations and Crises of Ancient Civil Communities, eds. Gouschin, V. and Rhodes, P. J.. Stuttgart: 127–39.Google Scholar

Ryan, F. X. (1998) Rank and Participation in the Republican Senate. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Ryan, F. X. (2001) ‘Die Senatorenernennung gemäss dem ovinischen Gesetz’, RSA 31: 83–91.Google Scholar

Salmeri, G. (1982) La politica e il potere: saggio su Dione di Prusa (Quaderni del Siculorum gymnasium 9). Catania.Google Scholar

Santangelo, F. (2006) ‘Sulla and the senate: a reconsideration’, CCG 17: 7–22.Google Scholar

Santangelo, F. (2007) Sulla, the Elites and the Empire: A Study of Roman Policies in Italy and the Greek East (Impact of Empire 8). Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Santangelo, F. (2013) Divination, Prediction and the End of the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Santangelo, F. (2015) Teofane di Mitilene. Testimonianze e frammenti (I frammenti degli storici greci 9). Tivoli.Google Scholar

Schäublin, C. (1986) ‘Ementita auspicia’, WS 20: 165–81.Google Scholar

Scheid, J. (2005) Quand faire, c’est croire: les rites sacrificiels des Romains. Paris.Google Scholar

Scheidel, W. and Meeks, E. (2012) The Stanford Geospatial Network Model of the Roman World (= ORBIS), available at http://orbis.stanford.edu (accessed 13 January 2016).Google Scholar

Schiavone, A. (1987) Giuristi e nobili nella Roma repubblicana: il secolo della rivoluzione scientifica nel pensiero giuridico antico. Rome.Google Scholar

Schilling, R. (1982) La Religion romaine de Vénus: depuis les origins jusqu’au temps d’Auguste (2nd edn; Bibliothèque des Ecoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 178). Paris.Google Scholar

Scholz, P. (2003) ‘Sullas commentarii: eine literarische Rechtfertigung: zu Wesen und Funktion der autobiographischen Schriften in der späten römischen Republik’, in Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius. Gattungen, Autoren, Kontexte, eds. Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N. and Walter, U.. Darmstadt: 172–95.Google Scholar