Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figure
- List of table
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction
- Part I What are human rights?
- Part II How do human rights relate to group rights and culture?
- Part III What do human rights require of the global economy?
- Part IV How do human rights relate to environmental policy?
- 11 Human rights in a hostile climate
- 12 A human rights approach to energy, poverty and gender inequality
- 13 Pollution wolves in scientific sheep’s clothing
- Part V Is there a human right to democracy?
- Part VI What are the limits of rights enforcement?
- Part VII Are human rights progressive?
- Index
- References
13 - Pollution wolves in scientific sheep’s clothing
Why environmental-risk assessors and policy-makers ignore the “hard issues” of the human rights of pollution victims
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2013
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figure
- List of table
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction
- Part I What are human rights?
- Part II How do human rights relate to group rights and culture?
- Part III What do human rights require of the global economy?
- Part IV How do human rights relate to environmental policy?
- 11 Human rights in a hostile climate
- 12 A human rights approach to energy, poverty and gender inequality
- 13 Pollution wolves in scientific sheep’s clothing
- Part V Is there a human right to democracy?
- Part VI What are the limits of rights enforcement?
- Part VII Are human rights progressive?
- Index
- References
Summary
In 1998, seven-year-old Emily Pearson died of brain cancer. She was one of 16 children living in a four-block-area of Hammond, Indiana, of all of whom (mostly toddlers) were diagnosed with rare cancers, all clearly tied to ethylene-dichloride (EDC) and vinyl-chloride releases from nearby Keil Chemicals, owned by Ferro Corporation. In 1993, the year before Emily’s diagnosis, the US Environmental Protection Agency said the local corporation was the nation’s top emitter of EDC. It predicted the Hammond facility would cause scores of new, otherwise-avoidable local cancers. After many young children died, Ferro-Keil denied responsibility but admitted annually releasing 2,000,000,000 pounds (907,184,470 grams) of EDC – only a gram of which can be fatal for a child (Shrader-Frechette 2007a, 3–7).
Apart from whether Ferro-Keil actually caused all these deaths and injuries of Indiana children, did it violate their human rights by subjecting them to high doses of known carcinogens and neurotoxins? Why is recognizing the human rights of vulnerable groups, threatened by pollution, a hard question?
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human RightsThe Hard Questions, pp. 246 - 268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
Allen v. Pennsylvania Engineering Corp. 1996. 102 V.3d 194, 195 (5th Cir.).
and 1997. “The Causes and Prevention of Cancer.” Environmental Health Perspectives 105, Supplement 4, 865–874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. 2000. “The Precautionary Principle and Children’s Health.” Available at: (accessed February 18, 2006).
2005a. Priority 2005 Issues: Fact Sheets, Health Disparities, Environmental Disparities, Racial/Ethnic Disparities, 2005. Available at: (accessed February 25, 2006).
2005b. “Human Rights in the Curricula for Health Professionals.” Available at: , policy 9813 (accessed March 17, 2005).
2005c. “Public Health Code of Ethics.” Available at: (accessed February 25, 2006).
2005d. “APHA’s Principles on Public Health and Human Rights.” Available at: (accessed March 17, 2005).
. 2011. “Water Leak Stops at Fukushima, But Big Problems Remain.” Nature, April. Available at: (accessed June 4, 2011).Google Scholar
. 1993. Did Occupational Exposure to ETO Cause Mr. Walter Allen’s Brain Tumor? 809 Unpublished Report, April 13, 1993.
2008. Personal communication regarding Allen v. Pennsylvania Engineering, Document 846 C, email to Kristin Shrader-Frechette; received November 24, 2008, at [email protected].
and , eds. 1990. Trends in Cancer Mortality in Industrial Countries, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences609. New York Academy of Sciences.
, , , , and 1995. “Recent Cancer Trends in the United States.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 87:3, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. 2000. Comments on the Use of Data from the Testing of Human Subjects, EPA-SAB- EC-00–017.
1999. “American Cancer Society.” International Journal of Health Services 29:3, 565–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , , , , and . 2002. “The Crisis in U.S. and International Cancer Policy.” International Journal of Health Services 32:4, 669–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. 2005. “Environmental Cancer” Isn’t What We Thought or Were Told. Cato Institute website at (accessed May 28, 2005).
and . 1994. “Human Interindividual Variability – A Major Source of Uncertainty in Assessing Risks for Non-Cancer Health Effects.” Risk Analysis 14, 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Some Industrial Chemicals: Ethylene Oxide CAS No.: 75–21–8.862, Monograph 60. Available at: vol60/m60–02.html (accessed November 24, 2008).
Draft 2005 Recommendations. Stockholm: ICRP.
2004b. Remarks to the U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board.
2005b. Remarks to the U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board.
1992. “Commentary: Environmental Disease – A Preventable Epidemic.” The American Journal of Public Health 82:7, 941–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1996. “The Prevention of Occupational Cancer.” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 46:4, 254–255.Google ScholarPubMed
, , , and , Health and Life Sciences Division of the US Office of Technology Assessment. 1981. Assessment of Technologies for Determining Cancer Risks from the Environment. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.Google Scholar
, , , , , , , and . 2002. “Environmental and Heritable Factors in the Causation of Cancer.” New England Journal of Medicine 343:2, 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Human Testing of Pesticides.” American Journal of Public Health 94, 1908–1916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and . 2004. Changing Landscape of Liability: A Director’s Guide to Trends in Corporate Environmental, Social and Economic Liability. Sustainability Limited.Google Scholar
and . 2008. Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997. “Amending the United States Constitution to Include Environmental Rights.” The Nation’s Health 27:8, 18–19.Google Scholar
. 2000. Cancer Rates and Risks. Washington, DC: NIH and NCI. Available at: (accessed May 28, 2005).Google Scholar
. 2011. “International Law and the Right to a Healthy Environment as a Jus Cogens Human Right.” International Conference of Information Systems for Business, January 20, 2011. Available at: (accessed May 26, 2011).Google Scholar
, , , and . 1987. “Alternatives to Using Human Experience in Assessing Health Risks.” Annual Review of Public Health 8, 356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and . 2004. “Time-Related Aspects of the Healthy Worker Survivor Effect.” Annals of Epidemiology 14, 633–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. 2005. “Characterizing the Burden of Occupational Injury and Disease.” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 47:6, 607–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. 1998. Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1997. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
2007b. “EPA’s 2006 Human-Subjects Rule for Pesticide Experiments.” Accountability in Research 14, 211–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 1977. “Neurobehavioral Effects of Prenatal Exposure to the Organophosphate Diazinon in Mice.” J. Toxicology and Environmental Health 3:5–6, 989–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and . 1996. “Negative Bias in Exposure-Response Trends in Occupational Studies: Modeling the Healthy Worker Survivor Effect.” American Journal of Epidemiology 143, 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, § 102 cmt. k (1987).
. 1990. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report 39, no. SS-2.
. 1993. Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. “The Hidden Flaw in Kiobel: Under the Alien Tort Statute, the Mens Rea Standard for Corporate Aiding and Abetting Is Knowledge.” Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 10:2, 119–145.Google Scholar
2005. Ratty Test Rationale. American Council on Science and Health. Available at: (accessed November 29, 2005).
. 2000. Tobacco Company Strategies to Undermine Tobacco Control Activities at the World Health Organization. Report of the Committee of Experts on Tobacco Industry Documents. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by