Introduction

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511511288.002

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 August 2009

Richard Ashby Wilson

Edited by

Richard Ashby Wilson

Show author details

Richard Ashby Wilson: Affiliation:
Gladstein Distinguished Chair of Human Rights and Director of Human Rights Institute, University of Connecticut
Richard Ashby Wilson: Affiliation:
University of Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Since the end of the cold war, human rights has become the dominant vocabulary in foreign affairs. The question after September 11 is whether the era of human rights has come and gone.

Michael Ignatieff, New York Times, 5 February 2002

The idea of rights is nothing but the concept of virtue applied to the world of politics. By means of the idea of rights men have defined the nature of license and of tyranny … no man can be great without virtue, nor any nation great without respect for rights.

Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, [1835]1991: 219

After the 9/11 attacks and the subsequent ‘war on terror’, have human rights irretrievably lost their status in international affairs and national policy-making? Or, as de Tocqueville declares, must rights always remain a fundamental part of democratic politics since they define the boundary between individual license and government tyranny? There now exists a plethora of books on international affairs after 9/11, too many to cite here, which examine the political fallout of the attacks on the United States and the subsequent U.S. response. Many are concerned with judging the proportionality of the U.S. response to Islamist terrorism, and in particular determining the justness or otherwise of U.S. military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In this literature, human rights issues such as the treatment of terror suspects may appear in passing, but usually to the extent that they impinge on other, wider political aims, such as holding credible elections in Iraq.

Type: Chapter
Information: Human Rights in the 'War on Terror' , pp. 1 - 36

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511288.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. (2004). New York: W. W. Norton and Co.

American Civil Liberties Union. (2003, July). Unpatriotic Acts: The FBI's Power to Rifle Through your Records and Personal Belongings Without Telling You.New York: ACLU. Available at: www.aclu.org/

Berman, P. (2003). Terror and Liberalism.New York: W. W. Norton and CoGoogle Scholar

Brown, C. (Ed.). (2003). Lost Liberties: Ashcroft and the Assault on Personal Freedom.New York: New PressGoogle Scholar

Brysk, A. (2002). Human Rights and Globalization.Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Bumiller, E. (2003, March 16). ‘US Names Iraqis Who Would Face War Crimes Tribunal’. New York Times. Late Edition, Final, Section 1, Col. 6, Foreign Desk, p. 1Google Scholar

Cole, D. (2003). Enemy Aliens: Double Standards and Constitutional Freedoms in the War on Terrorism.New York: New PressGoogle Scholar

Commission on Human Security (CHS). (2003). Human Security Now.New York. Available at: http://www.humansecurity-chs.org/finalreport/index.html

Danner, M. (2004). Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror.New York: New York Review of BooksGoogle Scholar

Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Legal Counsel. (2002, August 1). ‘Memorandum for Albert Gonzalez, Counsel to the President’. Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/documents/dojinterrogationmemo20020801.pdf

Dickinson, L. A. (2002, September). ‘Using Legal Process to Fight Terrorism: Detentions, Military Commissions, International Tribunals and the Rule of Law’. Southern California Law Review. vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 1407–92Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously.London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, R. (2003, November 6). ‘Terror and the Attack on Civil Liberties’. New York Review of BooksGoogle Scholar

Economist. ‘Just a Few Bad Apples?’ 22 January 2005, pp. 29–30

Elshtain, J. B. (2003). Just War Against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World.New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar

Falk, R. (2003). The Great Terror War.New York: Olive Branch PressGoogle Scholar

Financial Times. ‘Gonzalez Faces Sharp Senate Scrutiny on “Torture” Memos’. 6 January 2005

Financial Times. ‘Gonzalez Defends Policy on Detainees’. 7 January 2005

Financial Times. ‘Britain's Shame’. 20 January 2005

Freedland, J. (2002, September 26). ‘The Man for the Job’. The Guardian [UK]Google Scholar

Freeman, M. (2003). Freedom or Security: The Consequences for Democracies Using Emergency Powers to Fight Terror.Westport, CT: Praeger PublishersGoogle Scholar

Friedman, T. (2003). Longitudes and Attitudes: Exploring the World after September 11.New York: Farrar, Straus and GirouxGoogle Scholar

Gewirth, A. (1978). Reason and Morality.Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Gledhill, J. (1997). ‘Liberalism, Socio-Economic Rights and the Politics of Identity’. In Wilson, R. A. (Ed.), Human Rights Culture and Context.London: Pluto PressGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, K. J. & Dratel, J. L. (Eds.). (2005). The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 124 S. Ct. 2633, 159 L. Ed. 2d 578 (2004)

Held, D. (2004). Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus.Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar

Hentoff, N. (2003). The War on the Bill of Rights and the Gathering Resistance.New York: Seven Stories PressGoogle Scholar

Hersh, S. (2004). Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib.New York: Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar

Hogan, G. & Walker, C. (1989). Political Violence and the Law in Ireland.New York, Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar

Human Rights Watch. (2004, June). The Road to Abu Ghraib.New York: Human Rights Watch. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/reports/2004/usa0604/usa0604.pdf

Ignatieff, M. (2002, February 5). ‘Is the Human Rights Era Ending?’ New York TimesGoogle Scholar

Ignatieff, M.. (2003, September 7). ‘Why Are We In Iraq?’ New York Times Magazine, pp. 38–85Google Scholar

Ignatieff, M.. (2004). The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror.Princeton: Princeton University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Ireland v. The United Kingdom (5310/71) [1978] ECHRI (18 January 1978)

Kant, I. (1983). Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History and Morals. (T. Humphrey, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: HackettGoogle Scholar

Kessler, G. & Lynch, C. (2004, September 10). ‘U.S. Calls Killings in Sudan Genocide’. Washington Post, p. A01Google Scholar

Koh, H. (2001, November 23). ‘We Have the Right Courts for Bin Laden’. New York Times. Late Edition, Final, Section A, Col. 1, p. 39Google Scholar

LaFave, W. & Scott, A. (1986). Substantive Criminal Law. Eagan, MN: Thomson West GroupGoogle Scholar

Lawyers Committee for Human Rights (LCHR). (2003). Assessing the New Normal: Liberty and Security for the Post-September 11 United States.New York: Lawyers Committee for Human Rights

Leone, R. C. & Anrig, G. Jr. (Eds.). (2003). The War on Our Freedoms: Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism.New York: BBS Public AffairsGoogle Scholar

Lewis, A. (2004, July 15). ‘Making Torture Legal’. New York Review of Books, pp. 4–8Google Scholar

Luban, D. (2003). ‘The War on Terrorism and the End of Human Rights’. In Gehring, V. V. (Ed.), War After September 11. New York: Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar

Neier, A. (2002, February 14). ‘The Military Tribunals on Trial’. New York Review of Books, p. 11(5)Google Scholar

New York Times. ‘British Court Says Detentions Violate Rights’. 17 December 2004

New York Times. ‘Nominee Gave Advice to CIA on Torture Law.’ 29 January 2005

Observer [London]. ‘Editorial: Tough choices in the war on terror’. 8 August 2004

Popper, K. ([1945] 1962). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Vol. 1, Plato.London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Power, S. (2002). A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide.New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar

Prejean, H. (2005, January 13). ‘Death in Texas’. New York Review of Books, vol. LII, no. 1, pp. 4–6Google Scholar

President George W. Bush. Radio Address, March 15, 2003. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030315.html

Raban, J. (2005, January 13). ‘The Truth About Terrorism.’ New York Review of Books, vol. LII, no. 1, pp. 22–6Google Scholar

Railton, P. (1984, Spring). ‘Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 134–71Google Scholar

Rehnquist, W. H. (1998). All the Laws But One: Civil Liberties in Wartime.New York: Alfred A. KnopfGoogle Scholar

Robertson, G. (2001). Crimes Against Humanity.London: PenguinGoogle Scholar

Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 124 S. Ct. 2711, 159 L. Ed. 2d 513 (2004)

Schabas, W. (2001). An Introduction to the International Criminal Court.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Schulz, W. F. (2002). In Our Own Best Interest: How Defending Human Rights Benefits Us All.Boston: Beacon PressGoogle Scholar

Schulz, W. F.. (2003). Tainted Legacy: 9/11 and the Ruin of Human Rights.New York: Nation BooksGoogle Scholar

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom.New York: Alfred A. KnopfGoogle Scholar

Soros, G. (2002). On Globalization. New York: Public AffairsGoogle Scholar

Stocker, M. (1976). ‘The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories’. Journal of Philosophy, vol. 73, pp. 453–66CrossRef Google Scholar

Thornton, P. (1989). Decade of Decline: Civil Liberties in the Thatcher Years.London: National Council for Civil LibertiesGoogle Scholar

Tocqueville, A. de. ([1835] 1991). Democracy in America, Vol. 1, (Mayer, J. P. & Lerner, M., Eds.; G. Lawrence, Trans.). Norwalk, CT: Easton PressGoogle Scholar

Walzer, M. (2004). Arguing About War.New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Ward, L. (2001, November 17). ‘Leaders’ wives join propaganda war'. The Guardian [UK]Google Scholar

Wilkinson, P. (2000). Terrorism versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response.London: Frank CassGoogle Scholar

Williams, B. (1973). ‘A Critique of Utilitarianism.’ In Smart, J. J. C. & Williams (Eds.), B., Utilitarianism: For and Against.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Williamson, E. (2004). Borges: A Life.New York: VikingGoogle Scholar

Williamson, H. & Eaglesham, J. (2005, January 20). ‘UK Soldiers in Dock for “Following Order” in Iraq’. Financial TimesGoogle Scholar

Wilson, R. J. (1999). ‘Prosecuting Pinochet: International Crimes in Spanish Domestic Law’. Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 21(4), pp. 927–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Woodhouse, D. (Ed.). (2000). The Pinochet Case: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis. Portland, OR: Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar

Book contents

Introduction

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive