Book contents
- Human Beings in International Relations
- Human Beings in International Relations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- Introduction Human being(s) in international relations
- Part I International political anthropology
- Part II International political post-anthropology
- Conclusion Toward an International Political (Post-)Anthropology
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2015
Book contents
- Human Beings in International Relations
- Human Beings in International Relations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- Introduction Human being(s) in international relations
- Part I International political anthropology
- Part II International political post-anthropology
- Conclusion Toward an International Political (Post-)Anthropology
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human Beings in International Relations , pp. 332 - 368Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Aalberts, Tanja and Van Munster, Rens, “From Wendt to Kuhn. Reviving the Third Debate in International Relations,” International Politics 45/4 (2008), pp. 720–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aalto, Pami, “The Human Subject in International Studies: An Outline for Interdisciplinary Programmes,” in Harle, Vilho and Moisio, Sami (eds.), International Studies: Interdisciplinary Approaches (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011), pp. 178–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, Paul, “Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State,” Journal of Historical Sociology 1 (1988), pp. 58–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke A. and True, Jacqui, “Studying the Struggles and Wishes of the Age: Feminist Theoretical Methodology and Feminist Theoretical Methods,” in Ackerly, Brooke A., Stern, Maria, and True, Jacqui (eds.), Feminist Methodologies for International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 142–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 3 (1997), pp. 319–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, Ralph, “Processing of Emotional and Social Information by the Human Amygdala,” in Gazzaniga, Michael S. (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004), pp. 1017–30.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W., “Gesellschaft,” in Gesammelte Schriften (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1997), vol. VIII, pp. 9–19.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W., “Sociology and Empirical Research,” in Adorno, Theodor W. et al. (eds.), The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology (London: Heinemann, 1976), pp. 68–86.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. et al., The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper and Row, 1950).Google Scholar
Akerlof, George and Schiller, Robert, Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy and Why It Matters for Capitalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias, “Entgrenzung und Internationale Beziehungen: Der doppelte Strukturwandel eines Gegenstandes und seines Fachs,” in Hellmann, Gunther, Wolf, Klaus Dieter, and Zürn, Michael (eds.), Die neuen internationalen Beziehungen: Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2003), pp. 555–76.Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias, “Observing World Politics: Luhmann’s Systems Theory of Society and International Relations,” Millennium 28/2 (1999), pp. 239–65.Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias et al., “On Order and Conflict: International Relations and the ‘Communicative Turn’,” Review of International Studies 34/S1 (2008), pp. 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, John and Hibbing, John, “The New Empirical Biopolitics,” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008), pp. 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, John, Funk, Carolyn, and Hibbing, John, “Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted,” American Political Science Review 99 (2005), pp. 153–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alker, Hayward, Rediscoveries and Reformulations: Humanistic Methodologies for International Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel et al. (eds.), Comparative Politics Today: A World View (Glenview, IL: Pearson, 2010).Google Scholar
Andreatta, Filippo and Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, “Which Synthesis? Strategies of Theoretical Integration and the Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate,” International Political Science Review 31/2 (2010), pp. 207–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angell, Norman, The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009 [1910]).Google Scholar
Aradau, Claudia and van Munster, Rens, “Governing Terrorism through Risk: Taking Precautions, (Un)knowing the Future,” European Journal of International Relations 13/1 (2007), pp. 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret Scotford, Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibugi, Daniele and Held, David (eds.), Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (London: Penguin Books, 2006).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , The Complete Works of Aristotle: Revised Oxford Translation, ed. Barnes, Jonathan (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Arnold, Magda, Emotion and Personality (New York: Columbia University Press, 1960), vol. I.Google Scholar
Arsuaga, Juan Luis and Martínez, Ignacio, The Chosen Species: The Long March of Human Evolution (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard K., “Political Realism and Human Interests,” International Studies Quarterly 25/2 (1981), pp. 204–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, Richard K., “The Poverty of Neorealism,” International Organization 38/2 (1984), pp. 225–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, Richard K., “Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique,” Millennium 17/2 (1987), pp. 227–62.Google Scholar
Aspinwall, Lisa G. and McNamara, Atara, “Taking Positive Change Seriously: Toward a Positive Psychology of Cancer Survivorship and Resilience,” Cancer 104/11S (2005), pp. 2549–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinwall, Lisa G. and Taylor, Shelley E., “A Stitch in Time: Self-Regulation and Proactive Coping,” Psychological Bulletin 121 (1997), pp. 417–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, John Langshaw, How to Do Things with Words, 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayers, Edward L., Vengeance and Justice: Crime and Punishment in the 19th Century American South (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Baker, Keith, Condorcet: From Natural Philosophy to Social Mathematics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Ball, Terence, “Marx and Darwin: A Reconsideration,” Political Theory 7/4 (1979), pp. 469–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, Robert, Social Darwinism: Science and Myth in Anglo-American Social Thought (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel, “The Evolution of the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms,” Millennium 27 (1998), pp. 229–52.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel, Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel and Cronin, Bruce, “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations,” International Organization 48 (1994), pp. 107–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, Jerome H., Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John (eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelson, Jens, The Critique of the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelson, Jens, A Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelson, Jens and Baker, Gideon (eds.), The Future of Political Community (London: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory, Steps to an Ecology of Mind (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Bauer, Joanne and Bell, Daniel (eds.), The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1987).Google Scholar
Behr, Harmut and Heath, Amelia, “Misreading in IR Theory and Ideology Critique: Morgenthau, Waltz, and Neo-Realism,” Review of International Studies 35 (2009), pp. 327–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles R., Political Theory and International Relations, rev. edition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan, “Beware of False Prophets: Biology, Human Nature and the Future of International Relations Theory,” International Affairs 82/3 (2006), pp. 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan (ed.), Political Thought and International Relations: Variations on a Realist Theme (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan, “Writing the World: Disciplinary History and Beyond,” International Affairs 85 (2009), pp. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan and MacDonald, Paul K., “Correspondence: Start the Evolution without Us,” International Security 26/1 (2001), pp. 187–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jane, Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (New York: Anchor Books, 1966).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven, Lebow, Richard Ned, Stein, Janice Gross, and Weber, Steven, “God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Science to an Unpredictable World,” European Journal of International Relations 6/1 (2000), pp. 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berridge, Kent C., “Unfelt Affect and Irrational Desire: A View from the Brain,” in Manstead, Antony S. R., Frijda, Nico H., and Fischer, Agneta (eds.), Feelings and Emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 243–62.Google Scholar
Best, Michael H. and Connolly, William E., The Politicized Economy (Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1976).Google Scholar
Binder, Leonard, “The Natural History of Development Theory,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 28 (1986), pp. 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, Ken, “Fairness as a Natural Phenomenon” (online, 2009), accessible at http://else.econ.ucl.ac.uk/papers/uploaded/332.pdf [accessed 1 July 2015].Google Scholar
Bleiker, Roland and Hutchison, Emma, “Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics,” Review of International Studies 34/S1 (2008), pp. 115–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloor, David, Knowledge and Social Imaginary (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Bock, Kenneth, Human Nature and History: A Response to Sociobiology (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, James and Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias, “Introduction,” in Bohman, James and Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias (eds.), Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Booth, Ken, “75 Years On: Rewriting the Subject’s Past – Reinventing Its Future,” in Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 ), pp. 328–39.Google Scholar
Borsche, Tilman, “Individuum, Individualität,” in Ritter, Joachim et al. (eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1976), pp. 310–23.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert, A Co-operative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Origins (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi, Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Brewer, Paul R. and Steenbergen, Marco R., “All against All: How Beliefs about Human Nature Shape Foreign Policy Opinions,” Political Psychology 23/1 (2002), pp. 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britenbauch, Henrik O. and Wivel, Anders, “Understanding National IR Disciplines Outside the United States: Political Culture and the Construction of International Relations in Denmark,” Journal of International Relations and Development 7/4 (2004), pp. 414–43.Google Scholar
Brookes, Martin, Extreme Measures: The Dark Visions and Bright Ideas on Francis Galton (London: Bloomsbury, 2004).Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G. and Wohlforth, William C., World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Brown, Chris, “Structural Realism, Classical Realism and Human Nature,” International Relations 23/2 (2009), pp. 257–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy, “Neoliberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy,” in Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Power (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005), pp. 37–59.Google Scholar
Buck, Ross W., “Biological Affects: A Typology,” Psychological Review 106 (1999), pp. 301–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bühl, Walter L., “Das Ende der zweiwertigen Logik: Zur logischen Struktur der soziologischen Wandlungstheorien,” Soziale Welt 2 (1969), pp. 162–80.Google Scholar
Bühl, Walter L., Struktur und Dynamik des menschlichen Sozialverhaltens (Tübingen: Mohr, 1982).Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley, “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach,” World Politics 18/3 (1966), pp. 361–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buller, David, Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, “Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of ‘Postmodernism,’” in Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla, and Fraser, Nancy (eds.), Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange (New York: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, “The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR,” Review of International Studies 27/3 (2001), pp. 471–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Little, Richard, and Jones, Charles A., The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, Michel and Latour, Bruno, “Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macrostructure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So,” in Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. and Cicourel, Aaron V. (eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology (Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981), pp. 277–303.Google Scholar
Caraccioli, Mauro J., “Spatial Structures and the Phenomenology of Inter-National Identity,” International Political Sociology 5 (2011), pp. 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsnaes, Walter, “The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis” International Studies Quarterly 36/3 (1992), pp. 241–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnevale, Peter J. D. and Isen, Alice M., “The Influence of Positive Affect and Visual Access on the Discovery of Integrative Solutions in Bilateral Negotiation,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37 (1986), pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (New York: Harper & Row, 1964 [1939]).Google Scholar
Carroll, Patrick, “Beyond the Regulatory State Idea: The Constitutive State as a Co-production of Science and Government,” Society for the Social Studies of Science (Montréal, Québec, 2007).Google Scholar
Carroll, Patrick, Science, Culture, and Modern State Formation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, Amanda, “Evolutionary Psychology as Public Science and Boundary Work,” Public Understanding of Science 15 (2006), pp. 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, David, “Critiquing Liberal Cosmopolitanism? The Limits of the Biopolitical Approach,” International Political Sociology 3 (2009), pp. 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, David, “Globalising Foucault: Turning Critique into Apologia – A Response to Kiersey and Rosenow,” Global Society 24 (2010), pp. 135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Evan, “Genes and Ideologies,” Perspectives on Politics 6 (2008), pp. 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Evan and English, William, “Candidate Genes and Political Behavior,” American Political Science Review 106 (2012), pp. 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Evan and English, William, “Genopolitics and the Science of Genetics,” American Political Science Review 107 (2013), pp. 382–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Theodore His-en, “The New Socialist Man,” Comparative Education Review 13/1 (1969), pp. 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, “On Human Nature: Interview with Kate Soper,” Red Pepper (August 1998), accessible at www.chomsky.info/interviews/199808--.htm [accessed 1 July 2015].Google Scholar
Christakis, Nicholas A., “Let’s Shake Up the Social Sciences,” New York Times Sunday Review (July 19, 2013).Google Scholar
Cicero, , On Duties, transl. Atkins, Margaret (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Ciompi, Luc and Panksepp, Jaak, “Energetic Effects of Emotions on Cognitions: Complementary Psychobiological and Psychosocial Findings,” in Ellis, Ralph D. and Newton, Natika (eds.), Consciousness and Emotions (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2004), vol. I, pp. 23–55.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian, The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clore, Gerald L., “Cognitive Phenomenology: The Role of Feelings in the Construction of Social Judgment,” in Tesser, Abraham and Martin, Leonard L. (eds.), The Construction of Social Judgments (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992), pp. 133–64.Google Scholar
Clore, Gerald L. and Ortony, Andrew, “Appraisal Theories: How Cognition Shapes Affect into Emotion,” in Lewis, Michael, Haviland-Jones, Jeanette M., and Barrett, Lisa Feldman (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edition (New York: Guildford Press, 2008), pp. 628–42.Google Scholar
Clore, Gerald L. et al., “Affective Feelings as Feedback: Some Cognitive Consequences,” in Martin, Leonard L. and Clore, Gerald L. (eds.), Theories of Mood and Recognition: A User’s Guidebook (New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001), pp. 27–62.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly, “What Does It Mean to Be an American Social Science? A Pragmatist Case for Diversity in International Relations,” in Crawford, Robert M. A. and Jarvis, Darryl S. L. (eds.), International Relations – Still an American Social Science? Toward Diversity in International Thought (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Coker, Christopher, “War, Memes, and Memeplexes,” International Affairs 84 (2008), pp. 903–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colletti, Lucio, Karl Marx: Early Writings (Harmondsworth: ePenguin, Kindle Edition, 2005).Google Scholar
Connolly, William E., “Biology, Politics, Creativity,” Perspectives on Politics 11/2 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William E., “The ‘New Materialism’ and the Fragility of Things,” Millennium 41/3 (2013), pp. 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William E., Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Constantinou, Costas et al., “International Relations and the Challenges of Global Communication,” Review of International Studies 34 (S1) (2008), pp. 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coole, Diana, Merleau-Ponty and Modern Politics after Anti-Humanism (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007).Google Scholar
Coole, Diana and Frost, Samantha (eds.), New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda and Tooby, John, “Better than Rational: Evolutionary Psychology and the Invisible Hand,” American Economic Review 84 (1994), pp. 327–32.Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda and Tooby, John, “Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange,” in Barkow, Jerome H., Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John (eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 163–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Robert, “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory,” Millennium 10/2 (1981), pp. 126–55.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta C., “Human Nature and World Politics: Rethinking ‘Man,’” International Relations 23/2 (2009), pp. 271–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Neta C., “The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships,” International Security 24/4 (2000), pp. 116–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Robert, Idealism and Realism in International Relations: Beyond the Discipline (London, New York: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Crook, Paul, Darwinism, War and History: The Debate over the Biology of War from the “Origin of the Species” to the First World War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, Michel, Huntington, Samuel P., and Watanuki, Joji, The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Tri-lateral Commission (New York: New York University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Cudworth, Erika and Hobden, Stephen, Posthuman International Relations (London: Zed Books, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dant, Tim, “The Work of Repair: Gesture, Emotion and Sensual Knowledge,” Working Paper, 2009, accessible at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/3/7.html [accessed July 1 2015].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Aoust, Anne-Marie, “Introduction to the Sociology/ies of International Relations,” Journal of International Relations and Development 15 (2012), pp. 90–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles, The Descent of Man: Selection in Relations to Sex (Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics, 2004 [1971]).Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles, The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (New York: Philosophical Library, 1955).Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles, On the Origins of Species, World’s Classics edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008 [1859]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard, The Selfish Gene, 30th anniversary edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006 [1976]).Google Scholar
De Carvalho, Benjamin, Leira, Halvard, and Hobson, John M., “The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919,” Millennium 39 (2011), pp. 735–58.Google Scholar
Degler, Carl N., In Search of Human Nature: The Decline and Revival of Darwinism in American Social Thought (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
De Landa, Manuel, A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity (New York: Continuum, 2006).Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C., Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life (London: Simon & Schuster, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derryberry, Douglas, “Attentional Consequences of Outcome-Related Motivational States: Congruent, Incongruent, and Focusing Effects,” Motivation and Emotion 17 (1993), pp. 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W., The Analysis of International Relations, 2nd edition (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978).Google Scholar
Devezas, Tessaleno, Modelski, George, and Thompson, William R. (eds.), Globalization as Evolutionary Process: Modeling Global Change (London: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
Dewey, John and Bentley, Arthur F., Knowing and the Known (Boston: Beacon Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Doty, Roxanne Lynn, “Aporia: A Critical Exploration of the Agent-Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory,” European Journal of International Relations 3/3 (1997), pp. 365–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, James E. and Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. Jr., Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, 4th edition (New York: Addison-Wesley Longman, 1997).Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W., Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism (New York: Norton, 1997).Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W., “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part I,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 12/3 (1983), pp. 205–35.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. and Leonard, Stephen T., “On the History and Historiography of International Relations,” in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. and Leonard, Stephen T., “History and Discipline in Political Science,” American Political Science Review 82/4 (1988), pp. 1245–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, Robin and Barrett, Louise (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve (eds.), International Relations Theories, Discipline and Diversity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Dupré, John, Human Nature and the Limits of Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dux, Günter, Historisch-Genetische Theorie der Kultur: Instabile Welten – Zur prozessualen Logik im kulturellen Wandel (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2000).Google Scholar
Dux, Günter, “Die Natur des Menschen und die Weltanschauung unserer Zeit,” in Kasper, Walter (ed.), Unser Wissen vom Menschen (Düsseldorf: Patmos Verlag, 1977).Google Scholar
Easton, David, The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science, 2nd edition (New York: Knopf, 1971).Google Scholar
Eigen, Manfred and Schuster, Peter, The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-Organization (Berlin: Springer, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul, “Basic Emotions,” in Dalgleish, Tim and Power, Mick (eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1999).Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul, “An Argument for Basic Emotions,” Cognition and Emotion 6 (1992), pp. 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert, The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2000 [1939]).Google Scholar
Elster, Jon and Hylland, Aanund (eds.), The Foundations of Social Choice Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa, “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology,” American Journal of Sociology 103/2 (1997), pp. 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa and Mische, Anne, “What Is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103/4 (1998), pp. 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, Stephen G., “Theory Trouble: The Case of Biopolitical Science,” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 39 (2010), pp. 55–71.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia, The Curious Feminist (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte, “Constructivism or the Eternal Return of Universals in International Relations: Why Returning to Language Is Vital to Prolonging the Owl’s Flight,” European Journal of International Relations 19/3 (2013), pp. 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Erik H., Gandhi’s Truth: On the Origins of Nonviolence (New York: Norton, 1969).Google Scholar
Erikson, Erik H., Young Man Luther: A Study in Psychoanalysis and History (New York: Norton, 1958).Google Scholar
Esposito, Elena et al., “Lockernde Umschriften von Fixierungen: Resümee zur Diskussion kontingenter Realitäten der Welt,” in John, René et al. (eds.), Ontologien der Moderne (Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2013).Google Scholar
Eturk, Ismael, Froud, Julie, Johal, Sukhdev, Leaver, Adam, and Williams, Karel (eds.), Financialization at Work: Key Texts and Commentary (London: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
Etzold, Thomas and Gaddis, John Lewis (eds.), Containment: Documents on American Strategy and Policy, 1945–1950 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz, “Political Behavior,” in Sills, David L. and Merton, Robert K. (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (New York: Free Press, 1968), vol. XII.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnham, Barbara (ed.), Avoiding Losses/Taking Risks: Prospect Theory and International Conflict (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Feldman, Marcus E. and Lloyd, Elizabeth, “Evolutionary Psychology: A View from Evolutionary Biology,” Psychological Inquiry 13 (2002), pp. 150–6.Google Scholar
Feldman Barrett, Lisa, “Are Emotions Natural Kinds?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (2006), pp. 28–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Yale and Mansbach, Richard, Remapping Global Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 95–6.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, National Interest in International Society (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52/4 (1998), pp. 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Toope, Stephen, “Alternatives to ‘Legalization’: Richer Views of Law and Politics,” International Organization 55/3 (2001), pp. 743–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Agneta H. and Manstead, Anthony S., “Social Functions of Emotion,” in Lewis, Michael, Haviland-Jones, Jeanette M., and Barrett, Lisa Feldman (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edition (New York: Guildford Press, 2008), pp. 456–68.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane, “Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12/4 (1987), pp. 621–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flockhart, Trine, “‘Complex Socialization’: A Framework for the Study of State Socialization,” European Journal of International Relations 12 (2006), pp. 89–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florini, Ann, “The Evolution of International Norms,” International Studies Quarterly 40 (1996), pp. 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry, The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Forbes, Ian, “Conclusion,” in Forbes, Ian and Smith, Steve (eds.), Politics and Human Nature (London: Palgrave, 1983).Google Scholar
Forbes, Ian and Smith, Steve (eds.), Politics and Human Nature (London: Palgrave, 1983).Google Scholar
Forde, Steven, “International Realism and the Science of Politics: Thucydides, Machiavelli, and Neorealism,” International Studies Quarterly 39/2 (1995), pp. 141–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forde, Steven, “Classical Realism,” in Nardin, Terry and Mapel, David R. (eds.), Traditions of International Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 372–93.Google Scholar
Förster, Heinz von, Wissen und Gewissen: Versuch einer Brücke, ed. Schmidt, Siegfried J. (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1993).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality Vol. 1: The Will to Knowledge (London: Penguin, 1998).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Introduction to Kant’s Anthropology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things (New York: Random House 1994 [1970]) and (New York: Pantheon, 1970).Google Scholar
The Foucault Effect eds. Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), pp. 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978, transl. Burchell, G. (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2007).Google Scholar
Fowler, James and Dawes, Christopher, “In Defense of Genopolitics,” American Political Science Review 107 (2012).Google Scholar
Fox Keller, Evelyn, Reflections on Gender and Science, 10th anniversary edition (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Fracchia, Joseph and Lewontin, Richard C., “Does Culture Evolve?” History & Theory 38 (1999), pp. 52–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert H., Passions without Reasons: The Strategic Role of Emotions (New York: Norton, 1988).Google Scholar
Franklin, John Hope, The Militant South, 1800–1861 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah, Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Frederickson, Barbara L., “The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology: The Broaden-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions,” American Psychologist 56 (2001), pp. 218–26.Google Scholar
Freeman, Dennis, Margaret Mead and Samoa (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, 24 vols., eds. Strachey, James et al. (London: Hogarth, 1953–74).Google Scholar
Freyberg-Inan, Annette, “Rational Paranoia and Enlightened Machismo: The Strange Psychological Foundations of Realism,” Journal of International Relations and Development 9/3 (2006), pp. 247–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyberg-Inan, Annette, What Moves Man: The Realist Theory of International Relations and Its Judgment of Human Nature (New York: SUNY Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Freyberg-Inan, Annette, Harrison, Ewan, and James, Patrick (eds.), Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey, “Introduction: Economic Approaches to Politics,” in Friedman, Jeffrey (ed.), The Rational Choice Controversy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Friedman, Thomas, The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005).Google Scholar
Frijda, Nico H., “The Psychologists’ Point of View,” in Lewis, Michael, Haviland-Jones, Jeannette M., and Barrett, Lisa Feldman (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edition (New York: Guildford Press, 2008), pp. 68–87.Google Scholar
Fromkin, David, “Remembering Hans Morgenthau,” World Policy Journal 10/3 (1993), pp. 81–8.Google Scholar
Fry, Douglas (ed.), War, Peace and Human Nature: The Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Peter, Das Maß aller Dinge: Eine Abhandlung zur Metaphysik des Menschen (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2007).Google Scholar
Fuchs, Peter, Die Psyche: Studien zur Innenwelt der Außenwelt der Innenwelt (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2005).Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis, The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011).Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis, “Women and the Evolution of World Politics,” Foreign Affairs 77/5 (1998), pp. 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, Peter and Hevly, Bruce (eds.), Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Gat, Azar, “So Why Do People Fight? Evolutionary Theory and the Causes of War,” European Journal of International Relations 15/4 (2009), pp. 571–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David P., The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and George, Juliette, Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House: A Personality Study (New York: Dover Publications, 1964).Google Scholar
George, Jim, Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1994).Google Scholar
George, Jim, “Realist Ethics, International Relations, and Postmodernism: Thinking beyond the Egoism-Anarchy Thematic,” Millennium 24/2 (1995), pp. 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gilady, Lilach and Hoffmann, Matthew J., “Darwin’s Finches or Lamarck’s Giraffe: Does International Relations Get Evolution Wrong?” International Studies Review 15 (2013), pp. 307–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, “The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism,” in Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), pp. 301–21.Google Scholar
Gintis, Herbert, Game Theory Evolving, 2nd edition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Gintis, Herbert, “Behavioural Ethics Meets Natural Justice,” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2006), pp. 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Stacie and Nexon, Daniel, “Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 11 (2005), pp. 9–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, Patricia and Dunn, Kevin (eds.), Identity and Global Politics: Empirical and Theoretical Elaborations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua, War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodnight, G. Thomas, “Hans J. Morgenthau in Defense of the National Interest: On Rhetoric, Realism and the Public Sphere,” in Beer, Francis A. and Hariman, Robert (eds.), Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1996), pp. 143–70.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda, “The Welfare State: Towards a Socialist Feminist Perspective,” in Miliband, Ralph, Panich, Leo, and Saville, J. (eds.), Socialist Register 1990 (London: SRC Graham, 1990).Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio, Selections from the Prison Notebooks (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1971).Google Scholar
Gray, Jeffrey Alan, The Psychology of Fear and Stress, 2nd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Greenberg, Kenneth S., Honor and Slavery (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, Melissa and Seigworth, Gregory (eds.), The Affect Theory Reader (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Grene, David, Greek Political Theory: The Image of Man in Thucydides and Plato (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Griffiths, Martin, Rethinking International Relations Theory (London: Palgrave Macmillan 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Elizabeth, “Philosophy, Subjectivity and the Body: Kristeva and Irigaray,” in Pateman, Carole and Gross, Elizabeth (eds.), Feminist Challenges: Social and Political Theory (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1986), pp. 127–8.Google Scholar
Guilhot, Nicholas, “Introduction: One Discipline, Many Histories,” in Guilhot, Nicolas (ed.), The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Guilhot, Nicolas (ed.), The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Guillaume, Xavier, “Unveiling the ‘International’: Process, Identity and Alterity,” Millennium 35/3 (2007), pp. 741–58.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G., “Are We Losing Our Minds? Cognitive Science and the Study of Politics,” Political Theory 25/6 (2007), pp. 704–31.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano, “Note by the Editors. Symposium: The Return of Human Nature in IR Theory?” Journal of International Relations and Development 9/3 (2006), pp. 225–6.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano, “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 6/2 (2000), pp. 147–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano, Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold, 2nd edition (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, transl. Pensky, Max (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “Individuierung durch Vergesellschaftung: Zu G. H. Meads Theorie der Subjektivität,” in Nachmetaphysisches Denken (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1989), pp. 187–241.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian, The Social Construction of What? (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Hall, Cheryl, The Trouble with Passion: Political Theory beyond the Reign of Reason (New York: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Hall, Peter, “The Dilemmas of Contemporary Social Science,” boundary 2/34 (2007), pp. 121–42.Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce, “Human Nature as Behaviour and Action in Economics and International Relations Theory,” Journal of International Relations and Development 9/3 (2006), pp. 269–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (London: Free Association, 1991).Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna, Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and the Nature of Modern Science (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra, The Science Question in Feminism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M., The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Harvey, David, A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K. and McDermott, Rose (eds.), Man Is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, Biology, and Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K. and McDermott, Rose, “A Neurobiological Approach to Foreign Policy Analysis: Identifying Individual Differences in Political Violence,” Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (2012), pp. 111–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Mike, Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860–1945: Nature as Model and Nature as Threat (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Elements of the Philosophy of Right (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 [1820]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, “Letter on Humanism,” in Heidegger, Martin, Basic Writings (New York: Harper & Row, 1977), pp. 213–66.Google Scholar
Held, David, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Held, David, “The Transformation of Political Community: Rethinking Democracy in the Context of Globalization,” in Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, Casiano (eds.), Democracy’s Edges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 84–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia (ed.), Justice and Care: Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herborth, Benjamin and Kessler, Oliver, “The Public Sphere,” in Denemark, Robert (ed.), The International Studies Encyclopedia (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2010).Google Scholar
Hermann, Margaret G. and Kegley, Charles Jr., “Rethinking Democracy and International Peace: Perspectives from Political Psychology,” International Studies Quarterly 39 (1995), pp. 511–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, Richard K. and Fischerkeller, Michael P., “Beyond the Enemy Image and Spiral Model: Cognitive-Strategic Research after the Cold War,” International Organization 49 (1995), pp. 415–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, John, International Politics in the Atomic Age (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, John, Political Realism and Political Idealism: A Study in Theories and Realities (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951).Google Scholar
Hibbing, John, “Neurobiology and Politics: A Response to My Critics,” Perspectives on Politics 11/2 (2013), pp. 520–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John and Smith, Kevin, “The Biology of Political Behavior: An Introduction,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614 (2007), pp. 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O., The Passions and the Interests. Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Behemoth, or The Long Parliament (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990 [1682]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, “De Corpore Politico,” in The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Sir Molesworth, William (ed.) (London: Scientia Aalen, 1962).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (London: Penguin, 1985) and (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991 [1651]).Google Scholar
Hobson, John and Seabrooke, Leonard (eds.), Everyday Politics of the World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Hodgetts, Richard M. and Hegar, Kathryn W., Modern Human Relations at Work, 9th edition (Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western, 2004).Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey, The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism (London: Routledge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey, “Evolutionary Approaches,“ in Jarvie, Ian C. and Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences (London: SAGE, 2011), pp. 413–29.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey, “Is Social Evolution Lamarckian or Darwinian?” in Laurent, John and Nightingale, John (eds.), Darwinism and Evolutionary Economics (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2001), pp. 87–118.Google Scholar
Hoff, Joan, A Faustian Foreign Policy: From Woodrow Wilson to George W. Bush: Dreams of Perfectibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Hoffman, Martin L., “Empathy and Prosocial Behavior,” in Lewis, Michael, Haviland-Jones, Jeannette M., and Barrett, Lisa Feldman (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edition (New York: Guildford Press, 2008), pp. 441–55.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley, “An American Social Science: International Relations” (reprint), in Crawford, Robert M. A. and Jarvis, Darryl S. L. (eds.), International Relations – Still an American Social Science? Toward Diversity in International Thought (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard, Social Darwinism in American Thought, rev. edition (New York: George Braziller, 1955).Google Scholar
Holland, John H., Emergence from Chaos to Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve, Explaining and Understanding International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Holmes, Marcus, “The Force of Face-to-face Diplomacy: Mirror Neurons and the Problem of Intentions,” International Organization 67/4 (2013), pp. 829–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Marcus, “International Politics at the Brain’s Edge: Social Neuroscience and a New ‘Via Media,’” International Studies Perspectives 15/2 (2014), pp. 209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole R., “The Belief System and National Images: A Case Study,” Conflict Resolution 6/3 (1962), pp. 244–52.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R., Crisis, Escalation, War (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Hom, Andrew R. and Steele, Brent J., “Open Horizons: The Temporal Visions of Reflexive Realism,” International Studies Review 12/2 (2010), pp. 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, Ted, Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Houghton, David Patrick, “The Role of Self-Fulfilling and Self-Negating Prophecies in International Relations,” International Studies Review 11 (2009), pp. 552–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Valerie M., “Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations,” Foreign Policy Analysis 1/1 (2005), pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, eds. Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Hume, David, An Inquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Beauchamp, T. L. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology (The Hague: Martinus Nijoff, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, “The Crisis of European Man,” in Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy (New York: Harper, 1965), pp. 149–92.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Hyman, John and Steward, Helen (eds.), Agency and Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inayatullah, Naeme and Blainey, David, International Relations and the Problem of Difference (London: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
International Law Commission, “Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law,” http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_l682.pdf [accessed March 2012].Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce, “This Sex Which Is Not One,” in Marks, Elaine and de Courtivron, Isabelle (eds.), New French Feminisms: An Anthology (New York: Schocken Books, 1981), pp. 99–106.Google Scholar
Isen, Alice M., “Some Ways in Which Positive Affect Influences Decision Making and Problem Solving,” in Lewis, Michael, Haviland-Jones, Jeannette M., and Barrett, Lisa Feldman (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edition (New York: Guildford Press, 2008), pp. 549–73.Google Scholar
Isen, Alice M., Shalker, Thomas E., Clark, Margaret S., and Karp, Lynn, “Affect, Accessibility of Material and Behavior: A Cognitive Loop?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (1978), pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, Patrick T., The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics (London: Routledge, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick T., “Forum Introduction: The State a Person? Why Should We Care?” Review of International Studies 30/2 (2004), pp. 255–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick T. and Nexon, Daniel, “Relations before States: Substance, Process, and the Study of World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 5/3 (1999), pp. 291–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick T. et al., “Forum on the State as a Person” Review of International Studies 30/2 (2004), pp. 255–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Stevi and Rees, Amada, “The Appalling Appeal of Nature: The Popular Influence of Evolutionary Psychology as a Problem for Sociology,” Sociology, 41 (2007), pp. 917–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, Daniel (ed.), “Forum ‘To the Things Themselves’ … and Back! International Political Sociology and the Challenge of Phenomenology,” International Political Sociology 5/1 (2011), pp. 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, Daniel and Freyberg-Inan, Annette (eds.), “Forum: Hidden Essentialisms: How Human Nature Assumptions Surreptitiously Shape IR Theory,” International Studies Review 14/4 (2012), pp. 645–65.Google Scholar
Janich, Peter, Kein neues Menschenbild: Zur Sprache der Hirnforschung (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2009).Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, “Morality, Policy and Theory: Reflections on the 1954 Conference,” in Guilhot, Nicolas (ed.), The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010), pp. 33–53.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, Lebow, Richard Ned, and Stein, Janice Gross, Psychology and Deterrence (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, Bob, “Bringing the State Back In (Yet Again): Reviews, Revisions, Rejections, and Redirections,” International Review of Sociology 11/2 (2001), pp. 149–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Cathryn, Dowd, Timothy J., and Ridgeway, Cecilia L., “Legitimacy as a Social Process,” Annual Review of Sociology 32 (2006), pp. 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Dominic, Adaptive Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Johnson, Dominic, Overconfidence and War: The Havoc and Glory of Positive Illusions (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Dominic and Tierney, Dominic, Failing to Win: Perceptions of Victory and Defeat in International Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Dominic et al., “Overconfidence in Wargames: Experimental Evidence on Expectations, Aggression, Gender and Testosterone,” Proceeding of the Royal Society B 273 (2006), pp. 2513–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Laurie, Thucydides, Hobbes and the Interpretation of Realism (Dekalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Jordan, Richard, Malinkiak, Daniel, Oakes, Amy, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael J., “One Discipline or Many? TRIP Survey of International Relations Faculty in Ten Countries,” Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) Project (Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary, 2009), accessible at https://www.wm.edu/offices/itpir/_documents/trip/final_trip_report_2009.pdf.Google Scholar
Joseph, Jonathan, “The Limits of Governmentality: Social Theory and the International,” European Journal of International Relations 16 (2010), pp. 223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Jonathan, “What Can Governmentality Do for IR?” International Political Sociology 2 (2010), pp. 202–4.Google Scholar
Josephson, Paul, “Science, Ideology and the State: Physics in the Twentieth Century,” in Nye, Mary Jo (ed.), The Cambridge History of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), vol. V, pp. 579–98.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Federico, Christopher M., and Napier, Jaime L., “Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities,” Annual Review of Psychology 60 (2009), pp. 307–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyce, Patrick, The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City (London: Verso Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, Collected Works (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1971 [1921]), vol. VI.Google Scholar
Jupille, Joseph and Caporaso, James, “Institutionalism and the European Union: Beyond International Relations and Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1999), pp. 429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jutersonke, Oliver, Morgenthau, Law and Realism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, Satoshi, “Evolutionary Psychological Foundations of Civil Wars,” The Journal of Politics 71 (2009), pp. 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, “Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?” Berlinische Monatsschrift 4 (1784), pp. 481–94.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, “Zum ewigen Frieden: Ein philosophischer Entwurf,” Werke in zwölf Bänden, ed. Weischedel, W. (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1977), pp. 195–251.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Arthur L. (ed.), The Sociobiology Debate: Readings on Ethical and Scientific Issues (New York: Harper and Row, 1978).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Morton, “The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations,” World Politics 19/1 (1966), pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, “International Relations Theory and the Analysis of Change,” in Czempiel, Ernst-Otto and Rosenau, James (eds.), Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges (New York: Lexington Books), pp. 291–304.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, Keohane, Robert, and Krasner, Stephen, “International Organization and the Study of World Politics,” International Organization 52 (1998), pp. 645–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., “International Liberalism Reconsidered,” in Dunn, John (ed.), The Economic Limits to Modern Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little Brown, 1977).Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D. and McGraw, Kathleen M., “Folk Realism: Testing the Microfoundations of Realism in Ordinary Citizens,” International Studies Quarterly 56/2 (2012), pp. 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Oliver, “On Logic, Intersubjectivity, and Meaning: Is Reality an Assumption We Just Don’t Need?” Review of International Studies 38/1 (2012), pp. 253–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Oliver, “Toward a Sociology of the International? International Relations between Anarchy and World Society,” International Political Sociology 3/1 (2009), pp. 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Oliver, “From Agents and Structures to Minds and Bodies,” Journal of International Relations and Development 10/3 (2007), pp. 243–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Oliver et al., “Forum on Critical Realism in International Relations,” Review of International Studies 38/1 (2012), pp. 187–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, The Concept of Anxiety (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, Soren Kierkegaard’s Journals and Papers, Autobiographical, Part 1: 1829–1848 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978), vol. V.Google Scholar
Kincaid, Harald, Dupré, John, and Wylie, Alison (eds.), Value-Free Science? Ideals and IIlusions (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karin, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, David, The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, David, Friendship in the Classical World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, David and Rutter, N. Keith, Envy, Spite and Jealousy: The Rivalrous Emotions in Ancient Greece (Edinburg: Edinburgh University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kontopoulos, Kyriakos, The Logics of Social Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, “Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law,” European Journal of International Relations 15 (2009), pp. 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowert, Paul and Legro, Jeffrey, “Norms, Identity and Their Limits: A Theoretical Reprise,” in Katzenstein, Peter (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia, 1996), pp. 451–97.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, “Re-thinking the ‘Inter’ in International Politics,” Millennium 35 (2007), pp. 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich and Ruggie, John Gerard, “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State,” International Organization 40/4 (1986), pp. 753–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, Ronald R. and Jackson, Patrick T., “Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric,” European Journal of International Relations 13 (2007), pp. 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurki, Milja and Wight, Colin, “International Relations and Social Science,” in Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve (eds.), International Relations Theories, Discipline and Diversity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 14–35.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, Raymond, The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology (New York: Penguin Books, 2005).Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Phillippe and Nancy, Jean-Luc, Retreating the Political, ed. Sparks, Simon (London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
Lake, David, Hierarchy in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Lal, Deepak, “Globalisation, Imperialism and Regulation,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 14 (2000), pp. 107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambie, John A. and Marcel, Anthony J., “Consciousness and the Varieties of Emotion Experience: A Theoretical Framework,” Psychological Review 109 (2002), pp. 219–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamy, Steven L., “Contemporary Mainstream Approaches: Neo-realism and Neo-liberalism,” in Baylis, John et al. (eds.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, 4th edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Lapid, Yosef L., “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post Positivist Era,” International Studies Quarterly 33/3 (1989), pp. 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larner, Wendy and Walters, William, Global Governmentality (London: Routledge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrabee, Mary Jeanne (ed.), An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives (New York: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Larsen, Randy J. and Buss, David M., Personality Psychology: Domains of Knowledge about Human Nature, 4th edition (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010).Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D., Politics: Who Gets What, When, How (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1936).Google Scholar
Latham, Robert, The Liberal Moment: Modernity, Security, and the Making of Postwar International Order (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, Reassembling the Social (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno, We Have Never Been Modern (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, “When Things Strike Back: A Possible Contribution of Science Studies to the Social Sciences,” British Journal of Sociology 51 (1999), pp. 105–23.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve, Laboratory Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Law, John, “On the Methods of Long Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation, and the Portuguese Route to India,” in Law, John (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1987), pp. 234–63.Google Scholar
Law, John, “Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion,” in Bijker, Wiebe E., Hughes, Thomas P., and Pinch, Trevor J. (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987), pp. 111–34.Google Scholar
Law, John and Callon, Michel, “Engineering and Sociology in a Military Aircraft Project: A Network Analysis of Technical Change,” Social Problems 35 (1988), pp. 284–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layne, Christopher, The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Lazarus, Richard S., Emotion and Adaptation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, A Cultural Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, “Power, Persuasion and Justice,” Millennium 33/3 (2005), pp. 551–82.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, “Reason, Emotion and Cooperation,” International Politics 42 (2005), pp. 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests, and Orders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, Why Nations Fight (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned and Stein, Janice Gross, “The End of the Cold War as a Non-Linear Confluence,” in Herrmann, Richard K. and Lebow, Richard Ned (eds.), Ending the Cold War: Interpretations, Causation, and the Study of International Relations (New York: Palgrave, 2004), pp. 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned and Stein, Janice Gross, We All Lost the Cold War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Thomas, “Neoliberalismus, Staat und Selbstechnologien: Ein kritischer Überblick über die governmentality studies,” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 41 (2000), pp. 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenk, Hans, Das flexible Vielfachwesen: Einführung in die moderne philosophische Anthropologie zwischen Bio-, Techno- und Kulturwissenschaften (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2010).Google Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C., “American Economic Reform in the Progressive Era: Its Foundational Beliefs and Their Relationship to Eugenics,” History of Political Economy 41/1 (2009), pp. 109–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel, Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Lewens, Tim, “Cultural Evolution: Integration and Scepticism,” in Kincaid, Harold et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael, Haviland-Jones, Jeanette M., and Barrett, Lisa Feldman (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edition (New York: Guildford Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C. and Ros, Steven, Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature (London: Penguin, 1984).Google Scholar
Leys, Ruth, “The Turn to Affect: A Critique,” Critical Inquiry 37 (2011), pp. 434–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, Anatol, America Right or Wrong: An Anatomy of American Nationalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend, “International Relations Theory: Great Debates and Lesser Debates,” International Social Science Journal 26/1 (1974), pp. 11–21.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend, “The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations,” International Studies Quarterly 18/1 (1974), pp. 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, Thomas and Ringmar, Eric, The Struggle for Recognition in International Relations (New York: Routledge Paradigm Publishers, 2011).Google Scholar
Linquist, Stefan (ed.), The Evolution of Culture: International Library of Essays on Evolutionary Thought (London: Ashgate, 2010).Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour, American Exceptionalism: A Double-edged Sword (New York: W. W. Norton, 1996).Google Scholar
Little, Richard and Buzan, Barry, “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory,” International Organization 47/3 (1993), pp. 327–52.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elizabeth, The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Elizabeth, “Evolutionary Psychology: The Burdens of Proof,” Biology and Philosophy 14 (1999), pp. 211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobell, Steven, Ripsman, Norrin, and Taliaferro, Jeffrey (eds.), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John, Second Treatise of Government, in Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter (New York: New American Library, 1965).Google Scholar
Lopez, Anthony and McDermott, Rose, “Adaptation, Heritability, and the Emergence of Evolutionary Political Science,” Political Psychology 33/3 (2012), pp. 343–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, Anthony, McDermott, Rose, and Petersen, M., “States in Mind: Evolution, Coalitional Psychology, and International Politics,” International Security 36/2 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loriaux, Michael, “The Realists and Saint Augustine: Skepticism, Psychology, and Moral Action in International Relations Thought,” International Studies Quarterly 36/4 (1992), pp. 401–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas, “On the Boundaries of the Social World,” in Natanson, Maurice (ed.), Phenomenology and Social Reality: Essays in Memory of Alfred Schütz (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1970).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, 2 vols. (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1997).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Essays on Self-Reference (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, “Individuum, Individualität und Individualismus,” in Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1989), vol. III, pp. 149–258.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Soziologische Aufklärung 6: Die Soziologie und der Mensch (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2005).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, “The World Society as a Social System,” International Journal of General Systems 8/3 (1982), pp. 131–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo, Discourses on Livy, transl. Bondanella, Julia Conaway and Bondanella, Peter (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997 [1517]).Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo, The Prince, transl. Codevilla, Angelo M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988 [1513]).Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne, “From Bringing to Putting: The State in Late Twentieth-Century Social Theory,” Canadian Journal of Sociology 16 (1991), pp. 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malthus, Thomas, An Essay on the Principle of Population (Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks, 2008 [1798]).Google Scholar
Mann, Michael, The Social Sources of Power (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Mann, Michael, “War and Social Theory,” in Shaw, Martin and Creighton, Colin (eds.), The Sociology of War and Peace (London: Macmillan, 1987), pp. 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James and Olsen, Johan, “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization 52 (1998), pp. 943–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George, Neuman, W. Russell, and Mackuen, Michael, Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (1843–44) (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, Selected Writings, ed. McLellan, David (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, The Communist Manifesto (London: Penguin, 1998 [1848]).Google Scholar
Masters, Roger, “Biology and Politics: Linking Nature and Nurture,” Annual Review of Political Science 4 (2001), pp. 345–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, Roger, “The Biological Nature of the State,” World Politics 35 (1983), pp. 275–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose, “The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscientific Advances for Political Science,” Perspectives in Politics 2 (2004), pp. 691–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose, Political Psychology in International Relations (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose, Risk-Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory to American Foreign Policy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose (ed.), Special Issue of Political Psychology on Prospect Theory, (25 April 2004), pp. 147–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinley, Michael, Economic Globalisation as Religious War: Tragic Convergence (London: Routledge 2008).Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War,” International Security 15/1 (1990), pp. 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19/3 (1994–95), pp. 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001).Google Scholar
Mehta, Uday Singh, Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. (ed.), The Philosophy of Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan, “Emotional Beliefs,” International Organization 64/4 (2010), pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan, “Human Nature and the First Image: Emotion in International Politics,” Journal of International Relations and Development 9/3 (2006), pp. 288–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan, “Rationality and Psychology in International Politics,” International Organization 59/1 (2005), pp. 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception, transl. Smith, Colin (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962).Google Scholar
Michel, Torsten, “In Heidegger’s Shadow: Phenomenological Critique of Critical Realism,” Review of International Studies 38 (2012), pp. 209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen, “Rationalizing Politics: The Emerging Synthesis of International, American, and Comparative Politics,” International Organization 52 (1998), pp. 759–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip, “Realism and Neoliberalism: From Reactionary Modernism to Postwar Conservativism,” in Guilhot, (ed.), The Invention of International Relations Theory, pp. 210–38.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald, “Sources of Transparency: Information Systems in International Regimes,” International Studies Quarterly 42 (1998), pp. 109–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy, “The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics,” American Political Science Review 85 (1991), pp. 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modelski, George and Poznanski, Kazimierz (eds.), Special Issue “Evolutionary Paradigms in the Social Sciences,” International Studies Quarterly 40 (1996), pp. 315–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Donald, “The Logic of Political Inquiry: A Synthesis of Opposed Perspectives,” in Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson (eds.), Handbook of Political Science (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975), vol. I, pp. 131–228.Google Scholar
Moon, Katherine, Sex among Allies: Military Prostitution in U.S.-Korea Relations (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Moors, Agnes and De Houwer, Jan, “Automaticity: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin 132 (2006), pp. 297–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moravcsik, Andrew, “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,” International Organization 51/4 (1997), pp. 513–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., In Defense of the National Interest (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1951).Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948) and 2nd edition (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1955), and (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1977) and 5th edition (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1985).Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., Scientific Man versus Power Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1946).Google Scholar
Mukerji, Chandra, Territorial Ambitions and the Garden of Versailles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Mulligan, Shane P., “The Uses of Legitimacy in International Relations,” Millennium 34 (2006), pp. 349–75.Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia, “Hobbes and the ‘Hobbesian Tradition’ in International Thought,” Millennium 11/3 (1982), pp. 203–22.Google Scholar
Neacsu, Mihaela, Hans J. Morgenthau’s Theory of International Relations: Disenchantment and Re-Enchantment (New York: Palgrave, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy and Lindee, M. Susan, The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon (New York: Freeman, 1995).Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver, “Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy,” Millennium 31/3 (2002), pp. 627–51.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. and Sending, Ole Jacob, “‘The International’ as Governmentality,” Millennium 35/3 (2007), pp. 677–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Linda, “Introduction,” in Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla, and Fraser, Nancy (eds.), Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange (New York: Routledge, 1995), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold, The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness (New York: Scribner’s, 1944).Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold, Christianity and Power Politics (New York: C. Scribner’s Sons, 1969 [1948]).Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold, The Meaning of Revelation (Westminster: John Knox Press, 2006 [1941]).Google Scholar
Niesen, Peter, “Volk-von-Teufeln-Republikanismus: Zur Frage nach den moralischen Ressourcen der liberalen Demokratie,” in Wingert, Lutz and Günther, Klaus (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlickeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2001), pp. 568–604.Google Scholar
Nisbett, Richard, The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently … and Why (New York: Free Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric, The Autonomy of the Democratic State (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
North, Douglass, Understanding the Process of Economic Change (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy and Sandis, Constantine (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odysseos, Louiza, The Subject of Coexistence: Otherness in International Relations (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Offe, Claus, Strukturprobleme des kapitalistischen Staates (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1972).Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas G., World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Oren, Ido, Our Enemies and US: America’s Rivalries and the Making of Political Science (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Ortony, Andrew, Clore, Gerald, and Collins, A., The Cognitive Structure of Emotion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiander, Andreas, “Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited,” International Studies Quarterly 42/3 (1998), pp. 409–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, Susan, Griffiths, Paul E., and Gray, Russell D., Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Panksepp, Jaak, “The Affective Brain and Core Consciousness: How Does Neural Activity Generate Emotional Feelings,” in Lewis, Michael, Haviland-Jones, Jeannette M., and Barrett, Lisa Feldman (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edition (New York: Guildford Press, 2008), pp. 47–67.Google Scholar
Panksepp, Jaak, Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, “Social Interaction,” in Sills, David L. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (New York: Macmillan, 1968), vol. VII, pp. 429–41.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, The Social System (New York: Routledge, 1991 [1951] and New York: Free Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott et al. (eds.), Towards a General Theory of Action (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passoth, Jan-Hendrik, Peuker, Birgit, and Schillmeier, Michael, Agency without Actors? (London: Routledge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passoth, Jan-Hendrik and Rowland, Nicholas J., “Actor-Network-State,” International Sociology 25 (2010), pp. 818–41.Google Scholar
Pease, Donald E., The New American Exceptionalism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Peciña, Susana, Smith, Kyle S., and Berridge, Kent C., “Hedonic Hot Spots in the Brain,” The Neuroscientist 12 (2006), pp. 500–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, Ulrik, “Breathing Nietzsche’s Air: New Reflections on Morgenthau’s Concept of Power and Human Nature,” Alternatives 24/1 (1999), pp. 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettman, Ralph, Intending the World: A Phenomenology of International Affairs (Carlton: Melbourne University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Phelps, Elizabeth A., “The Human Amygdala and Awareness: Interactions Between Emotion and Cognition,” in Gazzaniga, Michael S. (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004), pp. 1005–16.Google Scholar
Pickett, Brent, “Foucault and the Politics of Resistance,” Polity 28/4 (1996), pp. 445–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinch, Trevor J. and Bijker, Wiebe E., “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other,” Social Studies of Science 14 (1986), pp. 399–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven, The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined (New York: Viking, 2011).Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven, The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature (London: Allen Lane, 2002).Google Scholar
Plato, , The Collected Dialogues, eds. Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Plessner, Helmuth, “Homo absconditus,” in Dux, Günter et al. (eds.), Helmuth Plessner, Gesammelte Schriften VIII: Conditio humana (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1983), pp. 356–66.Google Scholar
Plutchik, Robert, “A General Psychoevolutionary Theory of Emotion,” in Plutchik, Robert and Kellerman, Henry (eds.), Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience, Theories of Emotion (New York: Academic, 1980), vol. I, pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
Posen, Barry, “Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power,” International Security 18 (1993), pp. 80–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos, Staatstheorie. Politischer Überbau, Ideologie, Sozialistische Demokratie (Hamburg: VSA, 1978).Google Scholar
Price, Richard, “Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics,” International Organization 62 (2008), pp. 191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard, “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines,” International Organization 52 (1998), pp. 613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C., “Uncertain about Uncertainty: Understanding the Multiple Meanings of a Crucial Concept in International Relations Theory,” International Studies Quarterly 51/3 (2007), pp. 533–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, William, “Neuroscience and the Fallacies of Functionalism,” History and Theory 49 (2010), pp. 412–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reus-Smit, Christian, The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan, “Between Utopia and Reality: The Practical Discourses of International Relations,” in Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, David M., The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Rice, Hugh, “Fatalism,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter Edition (2010), accessible at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fatalism/.Google Scholar
Richardson, Robert, Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, Peter J. and Boyd, Robert, Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Ridley, Matt, The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature (London: Penguin, 1993).Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik, “On the Ontological Status of the State,” European Journal of International Relations 2/4 (1996), pp. 439–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, “‘Let’s Argue!’ Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54 (2000), pp. 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Fiona, Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory and International Relations (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Rogow, Arnold A., James Forrestal: A Study of Personality, Politics, and Policy (New York: Macmillan, 1963).Google Scholar
Rose, Hilary and Rose, Steven (eds.), Alas Poor Darwin: Arguments against Evolutionary Psychology (London: Jonathan Cape, 2000).Google Scholar
Rose, Hilary and Rose, Steven, “Darwinism and After,” New Left Review 63 (2010), pp. 91–113.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas, Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power and Subjectivity in the Twenty-first Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas, Powers of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Nikolas and Miller, Peter, “Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government,” British Journal of Sociology 43 (1992), pp. 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Stephen Peter, “Military Effectiveness: Why Society Matters,” International Security 19 (1995), pp. 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Stephen Peter, War and Human Nature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. Turbulence in World Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin, “What’s the Matter with Realism?” Review of International Studies 16/4 (1990), pp. 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin, “Why Is There No International Historical Sociology?” European Journal of International Relations 12/3 (2006), pp. 307–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosow, Stephen J., “Paradigm, Tradition, and the Politics of Realism,” in Freyberg-Inan, Annette, Harrison, Ewan, and James, Patrick (eds.), Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009), pp. 233–52.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy, “The Development of the Social Sciences,” in Farr, James and Seidelman, Raymond (eds.), Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy, The Origins of American Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, “Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality among Men,” in Ritter, Alan and Bondanella, Julia Conway (eds.), Rousseau’s Political Writings (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1988).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, On the Social Contract, in Ritter, Alan and Bondanella, Julia Conway (eds.), Rousseau’s Political Writings (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1988).Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G., “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” in Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983), pp. 195–231.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G., “What Makes the World Hang Together?” International Organization 52/4 (1998), pp. 855–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggiero, Guido, The History of European Liberalism, transl. Collingwood, R. G. (Boston: Beacon Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Rushton, J. Philippe, “Ethnic Nationalism, Evolutionary Psychology and Genetic Similarity Theory,” Nations and Nationalism 11 (2005), pp. 489–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, James A., “Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion,” Psychological Review 110 (2003), pp. 145–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russett, Bruce M. and Starr, Harvey, World Politics: The Menu for Choice (San Francisco: Freeman, 1981).Google Scholar
Sagarin, Raphael D. and Taylor, Terence (eds.), Natural Security: A Darwinian Approach to a Dangerous World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Sagerstrale, Ullica, Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall, The Use and Abuse of Biology: An Anthropological Critique of Sociobiology (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall, The Western Illusion of Human Nature (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard, “Evolutionary Psychology and the Massive Modularity Hypothesis,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1998), pp. 575–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapolsky, Robert M., “Culture in Animals: The Case of a Non-human Primate Culture of Low Aggression and High Affiliation,” Social Forces 85 (2006), pp. 217–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapolsky, Robert M., “A Natural History of Peace,” Foreign Affairs 85 (2006), pp. 104–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapolsky, Robert M., “Stress and Cognition,” in Gazzaniga, Michael S. (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004), pp. 1031–42.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand, Course in General Linguistics, 3rd edition (Chicago: Open Court, 1986).Google Scholar
Scheuermann, Willliam E., Hans Morgenthau: Realism and Beyond (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Scheuermann, William E., “Realism and the Left: The Case of Hans J. Morgenthau,” Review of International Studies 34 (2008), pp. 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C., “On the History and Historiography of International Relations,” in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C., The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Scholte, Jan Aart, Building Global Democracy? Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholte, Jan Aart, “Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance,” Government and Opposition 39/2 (2004), pp. 211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuett, Robert, Political Realism, Freud, and Human Nature in International Relations: The Resurrection of the Realist Man (New York: Palgrave, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schülein, Johann August, “Einleitung oder: Warum erkenntnistheoretische Diskurse notwendige, aber endlose Geschichten sind,” in Schülein, Johann August und Balog, Andreas (eds.), Soziologie, eine multiparadigmatische Wissenschaft (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2008), pp. 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütz, Alfred and Luckmann, Thomas, Structures of the Life-World, (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1989), vol. II.Google Scholar
Schweder, Richard A., Haidt, Jonathan, Horton, Randall, and Joseph, Craig, “The Cultural Psychology of the Emotions: Ancient and New,” in Lewis, Michael, Haviland-Jones, Jeannette M., and Barrett, Lisa Feldman (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edition (New York: Guildford Press, 2008), pp. 409–27.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, Ullicia, Beyond the Science Wars: The Missing Discourse about Science and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Selby, J., “Engaging Foucault: Discourse, Liberal Governance and the Limits of Foucauldian IR,” International Relations 21 (2007), pp. 324–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadeen, Michael N. and Gold, Joshua L., “The Neurophysiology of Decision Making as a Window on Cognition,” in Gazzaniga, Michael S. (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004), pp. 1229–41.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Fred R., The Yale Book of Quotations (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Shaw, R. Paul and Wong, Yuwa, “Ethnic Mobilization and the Seeds of Warfare: An Evolutionary Perspective,” International Studies Quarterly 31/1 (1987), pp. 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimko, Keith I., “Realism, NeoRealism, and American Liberalism,” The Review of Politics 54 (1992), pp. 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinko, Rosemary E., “Geniuses, Exiles and (Liberal) Postmodern Subjectivities,” Journal of International Relations and Development 15 (2012), pp. 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidanius, James H. and Pratto, Felicia, Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Sidanius, James H. and Kurzban, Robert O., “Evolutionary Approaches to Political Psychology,” in Sears, David O., Huddy, Leonie, and Jervis, Robert (eds.), Handbook of Political Psychology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Singer, Peter, The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Socio-biology (Oxford: Clarendon, 1981).Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura, Gender, Justice, and the Wars in Iraq: A Feminist Reformulation of Just War Theory (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2006).Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, States and Social Revolutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, Barry, “The Politics of Truth and the Power of Hegemony,” in Hoy, David C. (ed.), Foucault (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986), pp. 157–73.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (n.p.: Gutenberg Publishers, 2011 [1759]).Google Scholar
Smith, Eliot R. and Mackie, Diane M., “Intergroup Emotions,” in Lewis, Michael, Haviland-Jones, Jeannette M., and Barrett, Lisa Feldman (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edition (New York: Guildford Press, 2008), pp. 428–39.Google Scholar
Smith, Eliot R. and Henry, Susan, “As In-Group Becomes Part of the Self: Response Time Evidence,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (1996), pp. 635–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Roger, “The Language of Human Nature,” in Fox, Christopher et al. (eds.), Inventing Human Science: Eighteenth-Century Domains (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Smith, Steve, “The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science?” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2/3 (2000), pp. 374–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steve, “Introduction,” in Forbes, Ian and Smith, Steve (eds.), Politics and Human Nature (London: Palgrave, 1983).Google Scholar
Smith, Steve, “Positivism and Beyond,” in Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 11–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steve, “Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11,” International Studies Quarterly 48/3 (2004), pp. 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, Duncan and Wendt, Alexander, “Why There Is International Theory Now,” International Theory 1/1 (2009), pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack L., The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack L., “Tensions within Realism: 1954 and After,” in Guilhot, Nicolas (ed.), The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010), pp. 54–78.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, Darwinism, Dominance, and Democracy: The Biological Bases of Authoritarianism (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1997).Google Scholar
Somit, Albert and Peterson, Steven A., “Rational Choice and Biopolitics: A (Darwinian) Tale of Two Theories,” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (1999), pp. 39–44.Google Scholar
Soper, Kate, “Realism, Humanism and the Politics of Nature,” Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 98 (2001), pp. 55–71.Google Scholar
Soper, Kate, What Is Nature? Culture Politics, and the Non-Human (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1995).Google Scholar
Sophocles, , “Antigone,” transl. Grene, David, in Grene, David and Lattimore, Richmond (eds.), The Complete Greek Tragedies, Sophocles (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), vol. II, pp. 161–213.Google Scholar
Spektorowski, Alberto and Mizrachl, Elisabet, “Eugenics and the Welfare State in Sweden,” Journal of Contemporary History 39/3 (2004), pp. 333–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V., Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought (Boston: Beacon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert, The Man versus the State and Other Essays (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1992).Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, Herbert, The Phenomenological Movement, 2 vols., 2nd edition (The Hague: Martinus Nijoff, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, “Subaltern Talk: Interview with the Editors,” in MacLean, Gerald M. and Landry, Donna (eds.), The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (New York: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik, “Diversity or Uniformity in the Modern World? Answers from Evolutionary Theory, Learning and Social Adaptation,” in Thompson, William R. (ed.), Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2001), pp. 110–32.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik, The Sovereign State and Its Competitors (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbruner, John D., The Cybernetic Theory of Decision: New Dimensions of Political Analysis (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmetz, George (ed.), State/Culture (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenner, Karen, The Authoritarian Dynamic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, “Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared,” International Studies Quarterly 44 (2000), pp. 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, “Evolutionary Tendencies in Realist and Liberal IR Theory,” in Thompson, William R. (ed.), Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2001), pp. 62–109.Google Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, “Lamarckian with a Vengeance: Human Nature and American International Relations Theory,” Journal of International Relations and Development 9/3 (2006), pp. 227–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, Making Sense of International Relations Theory (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2006).Google Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, “Neoclassical Realism and Identity: Peril Despite Profit across the Taiwan Strait,” in Lobell, Steven, Ripsman, Norrin, and Taliferro, Jeffrey (eds.), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, “Realist-Constructivism and Morality,” International Studies Review 6 (2004), pp. 341–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetter, Stephan and Walter, Jochen, “Let’s Play the Game of Human Rights: The Constitution of Global Political Order and the Rise of Individual Actorhood in World Society,” unpublished manuscript (2013).Google Scholar
Stevenson, Leslie and Haberman, David L., Ten Theories of Human Nature, 3rd edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Strydom, Piet, “Triple Contingency: The Theoretical Problem of the Public in Communication Societies,” Philosophy & Social Criticism 25/1 (1999), pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Michael P., Theories of International Relations: Transition vs. Persistence (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine, “African and Western Feminism: World-Traveling the Tendencies and Possibilities of Author(s),” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 20 (1995), pp. 941–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, Christine, Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Tang, Shiping, “Fear in International Politics: Two Positions,” International Studies Review 10/3 (2008), pp. 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Shiping, The Social Evolution of International Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, John D. and Fogarty, Sarah, “Differential Effects of Induced Mood on Retrieval of Pleasant and Unpleasant Events from Episodic Memory,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 88 (1979), pp. 248–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tellis, Ashley J., “Reconstructing Political Realism: The Long March to Scientific Theory,” Security Studies 5/2, (1995–96), pp. 3–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenbruck, Friedrich, “Der Traum der säkularen Ökumene: Sinn und Grenze der Entwicklungsvision,” Annali Di Sociologia 3 (1987), pp. 11–36.Google Scholar
Tétreault, Mary Ann and Lipschutz, Ronnie D., Global Politics as If People Mattered (Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009).Google Scholar
Thayer, Bradley, “Bringing in Darwin: Evolutionary Theory, Realism and International Politics,” International Security 25/2 (2000), pp. 124–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, Bradley, Darwin and International Relations: On the Evolutionary Origins of War and Ethnic Conflict (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2004).Google Scholar
Thayer, Bradley, “Evolution and the American Social Sciences: An Evolutionary Social Scientist’s View,” Politics and the Life Sciences 23 (2004), pp. 2–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thayer, Bradley and Hudson, Valerie, “Sex and the Shaheed: Insights from the Life Sciences on Islamic Suicide Terrorism,” International Security 34 (2010), pp. 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thies, Christian, Einführung in die philosophische Anthropologie, 2nd edition (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2009).Google Scholar
Thomas, William I. and Thomas, Dorothy S., The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs (New York: Knopf, 1928), pp. 571–2.Google Scholar
Thompson, William R. (ed.), Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Thompson, William R., “Evolving toward an Evolutionary Perspective,” in Thompson, William R. (ed.) Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2001), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Thucydides, , The Landmark Thucydides: A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War, ed. Strassler, Robert B. (New York: Free Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann, Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann, “Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation,” Millennium 17/3 (1988), pp. 429–40.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, “Reflections on the History of European State-Making,” in Tilly, Charles (ed.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973), pp. 3–83.Google Scholar
Tomkins, Silvan S., Affect. Imagery and Consciousness, The Positive Affects (New York: Springer, 1962), vol. I.Google Scholar
Tooby, John and Cosmides, Leda, “Friendship and the Banker’s Paradox: Other Pathways to the Evolution of Adaptations for Altruism,” in Runciman, Walter Garrison, Smith, John Maynard, and Dunbar, Robin Ian M. (eds.), Evolution of Social Behaviour Patterns in Primates and Man, Proceedings of the British Academy 88 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 119–43.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan C., “Beyond Gender Difference to a Theory of Care,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12/4 (1987), pp. 644–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Robert, “Conditioned Subjects: Connolly, the Amygdala, Fear, and Freedom,” Theory & Event 13/3 (2011).Google Scholar
Tymieniecka, Anna-Teresa (ed.), Phenomenology World-Wide: Foundations, Expanding Dynamisms, Life-Engagements (Norwell: Kluwer Academic, 2002).Google Scholar
Valk, F. Vander (ed.), Essays on Neuroscience and Political Theory: Thinking the Body Politic (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen, “Primed for Peace: Europe after the Cold War,” International Security 15/3 (1990–91), pp. 7–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertzberger, Yaakov Y. I., The World in Their Minds: Information Processing, Cognition, and Perception in Foreign Policy Decisionmaking (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Waal, Frans, The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society (London: Souvenir Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Waal, Frans, “Interview: How Humans Found a Nicer Way to Evolve,” The Observer, New Reviews (19 September 2010).Google Scholar
Waever, Ole, “Resisting the Temptation of Post Foreign Policy Analysis,” in Carlsnaes, Walter and Smith, Steve (eds.), European Foreign Policy: The EC and Changing Perspectives in Europe (London: Sage, 1995).Google Scholar
Waever, Ole, “The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate,” in Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 149–85.Google Scholar
Waever, Ole, “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations,” International Organization 52 (1998), pp. 687–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Rob B. J., Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen M., “The Relationship between Theory and Policy in International Relations,” Annual Review of Political Science 8 (2005), pp. 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Alex, “The Anti-naturalistic Fallacy: Evolutionary Moral Psychology and the Insistence of Brute Facts,” Evolutionary Psychology 4 (2006), pp. 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., “Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics,” in Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), pp. 322–45.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959 [2001]).Google Scholar
Watson, John B. and Morgan, J. J. B., “Emotional Reactions and Psychological Experimentation,” American Journal of Psychology 28 (1917), pp. 163–74.Google Scholar
Weber, Cynthia, Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State, and Symbolic Exchange (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, ed. Roth, G. and Wittich, C. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978), vol. I.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 1958 [1905]).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, The Vocation Lectures, eds. Owen, David S. et al. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2004).Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Organization 41/3 (1987), pp. 335–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46/2 (1992), pp. 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, “Collective Identity Formation and the International State,” American Political Science Review 88 (1994), pp. 384–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, “The State as Person in International Theory,” Review of International Studies 30/2 (2004), pp. 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Ralph K., Fearful Warriors: A Psychological Profile of US-Soviet Relations (Don Mills: Collier Macmillan, 1984).Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C. (ed.), Biology and the Social Sciences: An Emerging Revolution (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Wight, Colin, Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Colin, “Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations,” in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 23–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Martin. International Theory: The Three Traditions (London: Leicester University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Wight, Martin, “Why Is There No International Theory?” International Relations 2/1 (1960), pp. 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. (ed.), Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C., The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C., “Rousseau, Realism and Realpolitik,” Millennium 18/2 (1989), pp. 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C., “Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 58 (2004), pp. 633–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Patrick and Chrisman, Laura (eds.), Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader (London: Longman, 1993).Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O., Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000 [1975]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, David, “Philosopher-King or Polarizing Politician? A Personality Profile of Barack Obama,” Political Psychology 32/6 (2011), pp. 1059–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, David, “Things I’ve Learned about Personality from Studying Political Leaders at a Distance,” Journal of Personality 73/3 (2005), pp. 557–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1953).Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold, Discord and Collaboration (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Richard D. and Resnick, Stephen A., Contending Economic Theories: Neoclassical, Keynesian, and Marxian (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon, Politics and Vision, rev. edition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt-Brown, Bertram, Southern Honor: Ethics and Behavior in the Old South (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion, “The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29/1 (2003), pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Michael and Schafer, Mark, “Is There Method in Our Madness? Ways of Assessing Cognition in International Relations,” Mershon International Studies Review 42/1 (1998), pp. 63–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, Robert B., “On the Primacy of Affect,” American Psychologist 39 (1984), pp. 117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, Robert B., “Thinking and Feeling: Preferences Need No Inferences,” American Psychologist 35 (1980), pp. 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia, “Feminist Standpoint Theory Meets International Relations Theory: A Feminist Version of David and Goliath?” Fletcher Forum on World Affairs 13 (1993), pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
Zehfuss, Maja, Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zehfuss, Maja, “Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison,” European Journal of International Relations 7 (2001), pp. 315–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zizek, Slavoj, The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology (London: Verso, 1999).Google Scholar