Albracht, F. 1895. Kampf und Kampfdarstellung bei Homer 2. Naumburg; Eng. trans.: Battle and Battle Description in Homer: A Contribution to the History of War, by P. Jones, M. Willcock, and G. Wright. London, 2005.Google Scholar

Ameis, K. F. and Hentze, C., eds. 1882. Homers Ilias für den Schulgebrauch erklärt, 2nd edn. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Andersson, T. M. 1976. Early Epic Scenery: Homer, Virgil, and the Medieval Legacy. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Andrewes, A. 1961. “Phratries in Homer.” Hermes 89: 129–40.Google Scholar

Arend, W. 1933. Die typischen Scenen bei Homer. Berlin.Google Scholar

Armstrong, C. B. 1969. “The Casualty Lists in the Trojan War.” Greece and Rome 16: 30–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, J. I. 1958. “The Arming Motif in the ‘Iliad’.” American Journal of Philology 79: 337–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asper, M. 1997. Onomata allotria: Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos. Hermes Einzelschriften 75. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Arthur, M. B. 1981. “The Divided World of Iliadvi.” In Reflections of Women in Antiquity, ed. Foley, H.. New York: 19–44.Google Scholar

Auerbach, E. 1953. “Odysseus' Scar.” In Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, trans.Trask, W.. Princeton: 3–23.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. 1994. “The Magical Number Seven: Still Magic after All These Years?” Psychological Review 10: 353–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balutova, B. 1979. Spatial Complex: A Study of Spatial Problems in Fiction Illustrated with Examples from Representative Works of English Short Fiction 1900–1925. Warsaw.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. 1993. “Discourse and Performance: Involvement, Visualization and ‘Presence’ in Homeric Poetry.” Classical Antiquity 12: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, E. J. 2005. Pointing to the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. 2008. “Epic Remembering.” In Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World, ed. Mackay, E. A.. Leiden: 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartolotta, A. 2002. L'occhio della mente. Un'eredità indoeuropea nei poemi omerici. Palermo.Google Scholar

Basset, L. 1989. “L'augment et la distinction discours/récit dans l'Iliade et l'Odyssée.” Études Homériques. Lyon: 9–16.Google Scholar

Becker, O. 1937. Das Bild des Weges und verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken. Hermes Einzelschriften 4. Berlin.Google Scholar

Beye, C. 1964. “Homeric Battle Narratives and Catalogues.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 68: 345–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum, H. 1969. Die antike Mnemotechnik. Spudasmata 15. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D., ed. 1998. The World of Troy. Special issue of Classical World 91.5.Google Scholar

Bolzoni, L. 1995. The Gallery of Memory: Literary and Iconographic Models in the Age of the Printing Press, trans. J. Parzen. Toronto.Google Scholar

Bonfazi, A. 2007. “Memory and Visualization in Homeric Discourse Markers.” In Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World, ed. Mackay, E. A.. Leiden: 35–64.Google Scholar

Brown, G. 1995. Speakers, Listeners and Communication: Explorations in Discourse Analysis. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brückner, A. 1912. “Das Schlachtfeld vor Troia.” ArchäologischerAnzeiger: 616–33.Google Scholar

Bruford, A. and Todd, N.. 1996. “The Eye behind the Mouth: The Contribution of Visual Memory to Oral Storytelling.” In Orality, Literacy, and Modern Media, ed. Scheunemann, D.. Columbia, SC: 7–14.Google Scholar

Buck, C. D. 1949. A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago.Google Scholar

Byre, C. S. 1994. “On the Description of the Harbor of Phorkys and the Cave of the Nymphs, Odyssey 13.96–112.” Americal Journal of Philology 115: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calame, C. 1991. “Quand dire c'est faire voir: l'évidence dans la rhétorique antique.” Études de Lettres 4: 3–22.Google Scholar

Carruthers, M. and Ziolkowski, J. M., eds. 2002. The Medieval Craft of Memory: An Anthology of Texts and Pictures. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Cauer, P. 1914. “Der Verlauf der Kampfszenen im M und O der Ilias.” Rheinisches Museum 69: 56–79.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. 1999. Between Geography and History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clay, J. Strauss. 1983. The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the Odyssey. Princeton.Google Scholar

Clay, J. Strauss. 1994a. “The Dais of Death.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association: 124: 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clay, J. Strauss. 1994b. “Sex, Drugs and…Poetry.” In Epic and Epoch: Essays on the Interpretation and History of a Genre, ed. Oberhelman, S., Kelly, V., and Golsan, R.. Lubbock: 40–48.Google Scholar

Clay, J. Strauss. 1995. “Agamemnon's Stance.” Philologus 139: 72–75.Google Scholar

Clay, J. Strauss. 1999. “The Whip and Will of Zeus.” Literary Imagination 1: 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clay, J. Strauss. 2003. Hesiod's Cosmos. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clay, J. Strauss. 2009. “How to Be a Hero.” In Ἀντϕίλησις: Studies in Classical, Byzantine and Modern Greek Literature and Culture in Honour of John-Theophanes A. Papademetriou, ed. Karamalengou, E. and Makrygianni, E.. Stuttgart: 30–38.Google Scholar

Colosanti, G. 1999. “Il simposio in Omero.” Materiali e Discussioni 43: 41–73.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Courtney, S., L. G. Ungeleider, K. Keil, and J. V. Haxby. 1996. “Object and Spatial Visual Working Memory Activate Separate Neural Systems in Human Cortex.” Cerebral Cortex 6: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cuillandre, J. 1944. La droite et la gauche dans les poèmes homérique en concordance avec la doctrine pythagorienne et avec la tradition celtique. Paris.Google Scholar

Culler, J. 1981. The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Danek, G. 1988. Studien zur Dolonie. Wiener Studien Beiheft 12. Vienna.Google Scholar

Danek, G. 1999. “Synchronisation von Handlungsträngen in Ilias 14. 1–40.” In Euphrosyne: Studies in Ancient Epic and its Legacy in Honor of Dimitris N. Maronitis, ed. Kazazis, J. N. and Rengakos, A.. Stuttgart: 76–88.Google Scholar

Danek, G. 2004. “Der Schiffskatalog der Ilias: Form und Funktion.” In Ad fontes! Festschrift für Gerhard Dobesch, ed. Hefner, H. and Dobesch, G.. Vienna: 59–72.Google Scholar

Davies, M. 1986. “Nestor's Advice in Iliad 7.” Eranos 84: 69–75.Google Scholar

Davison, J. A. 1965. “Thucydides, Homer and the Achaean Wall.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 6: 5–28.Google Scholar

Delebeque, E. 1958. Télémaque et la structure de l' Odyssée. Aix-en-Provence.Google Scholar

Delebeque, E. 1970. La construction de l' Odyssée. Paris.Google Scholar

Denis, M., Daniel, M.-P., S. Fontaine, and F. Pazzaglia. 2001. “Language, Spatial Cognition and Navigation.” In Imagery, Language, and Visuo-spatial Thinking, ed. Denis, M., Logie, R. L., C. Cornoldo, M. de Vega, and J. Engelkamp. Philadelphia: 137–60.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. 1965. “En Grèce archaïque: géométrie, politique et société.” Annales Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 20: 425–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Detienne, M. 1967. Les maîtres de la vérité en Grèce archaïque. Paris.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. 2004. “The θεατής θεῶν: Josephus C. Ap. 1.232 (FGRHist 609 f 10) Reconsidered.” Classical Journal 99: 239–52.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. 2008. “The θεατής: More Texts, Further Thoughts,” Classical Journal 103: 243–63.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Downs, R. M. and Stea, D.. 1977. Maps in Mind: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping. New York.Google Scholar

Dubel, S. 1997. “Ekphrasis et enargeia: la description antique comme parcours.” In Dire l'evidence (philosophie et rhétorique antiques), ed. Lévy, C. and Pernot, L.. Paris: 249–64.Google Scholar

Durante, M. 1968. “Epea pteroenta. Die Rede als ‘Weg’ in griechischen und vedischen Bildern.” In Indogermanische Dichtersprache, ed. Schmitt, R.. Darmstadt: 242–60.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. W. 1980. “The Structure of Homeric Catalogues.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American PhilologicalAssociation 110: 81–105.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. W. 1991. The Iliad: A Commentary, vol. v: Books 17–20. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, M. W. 1992. “Homer and Oral Tradition: The Type-Scene.” Oral Tradition 7: 248–330.Google Scholar

Elliger, W. 1975. Die Darstellung der Landschaft in der griechischen Dichtung. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esrock, E. J. 1994. The Reader's Eye: Visual Imaging as Reader Response. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Fenik, B. 1968. Typical Battle Scenes in the Iliad: Studies in the Narrative Techniques of Homeric Battle Descriptions. Hermes Einzelschriften 21. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Fenik, B. 1986. Homer and the Nibelungenlied: Comparative Studies in Epic Style. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, F. and Hegarty, M.. 1994. “Properties of Cognitive Maps Constructed from Texts.” Memory and Cognition 22: 455–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Finkelberg, M. 2002. “The Sources of Iliad 7.” Colby Quarterly 38: 151–62.Google Scholar

Fleischman, S. 1990. Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Austin.Google Scholar

Ford, A. 1992. Homer: The Poetry of the Past. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Ford, A. 2002. The Origins of Criticism. Princeton.Google Scholar

Foley, J. M. 1999. Homer's Traditional Art. University Park, PA.Google Scholar

Frank, J. 1963. “Spatial Form in Modern Literature.” In The Widening Gyre: Crisis and Mastery in Modern Literature. New Brunswick, NJ: 3–62.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. 1921. Die homerischen Gleichnisse. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. 1968. “Die Zeitauffassung in der archaischen griechischen Literatur.” In Wege und Formen frühgriechischen Denkens. Munich: 1–22.Google Scholar

Friedrich, P. 1974. “On Aspect Theory and Homeric Aspect.” International Journal of American Linguistics. Memoirs 28, 40: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedrich, W. H. 1956. Verwundung und Tod in der Ilias. Göttingen; Eng. trans.: Wounding and Death in the Iliad, by Wright, G. and Jones, P.. London, 2003.Google Scholar

Friedrich, W. H. 1982. “Von homerischen Gleichnissen und ihren Schicksalen,” Antike und Abendland 28: 103–30.Google Scholar

Gehrke, H.-J. 1998. “Die Geburt der Erdkunde aus dem Geiste der Geometrie. Überlegungen zur Entstehung und zur Frühgeschichte der wissenschaftlichen Geographie bei den Griechen.” In Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike, ed. Kullmann, W., Althoff, J., and Asper, M.. Scripta Oralia 95. Tübingen: 163–92.Google Scholar

Genette, G. 1980. Narrative Discourse: An Essay on Method, trans. Lewin, J. E.. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Giannisi, P. 1997. “Chant et cheminement en Grèce archaïque.” Quaderni di Storia 46: 133–41.Google Scholar

Giannisi, P. 2006. Récits des voies: chant et cheminement en Grèce archaïque. Grenoble.Google Scholar

Giovannini, A. 1969. Études historiques sur les origins du catalogue des vaisseaux. Bern.Google Scholar

Goldmann, S. 1989. “Statt Totenklage Gedächnis: Zur Erfindung der Mnemotechnik durch Simonides von Keos.” Poetica 21: 43–66.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J.. 2005. The Resonance of Epic. London.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. 1980. Homer on Life and Death. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hainsworth, J. B. 1966. “Joining Battle in Homer.” Greece and Rome 13: 158–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hainsworth, J. B. 1988. A Commentary on Homer's Odyssey, vol. i, ed. Heubeck, A., West, S., and Hainsworth, J. B.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hainsworth, J. B. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary, vol. iii. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellmann, O. 2000. Die Schlachtszenen der Ilias. Hermes Einzelschriften 83. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Hellwig, B. 1964. Raum und Zeit im homerischen Epos. Spudasmata 2. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Hope Simpson, R. and Lazenby, J. V.. 1970. The Catalogue of Ships in Homer's Iliad. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jacob, C. 1990. “Le voyage et le palimpseste: les parcours de la lecture dans un manuel de géographie antique.” Littérales 7: 31–49.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. 1944. “Patrios nomos: State Burial in Athens and the Public Cemetery in the Keramaikos.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 64: 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobson, R. 1981. Selected Writings: Poetry of Grammar and Grammar of Poetry, ed. Rudy, S.. The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janko, R. 1992. The Iliad: A Commentary, vol. iv. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Janni, P. 1984. La Mappa e il periplo: cartografia antica e spazio odologico. Rome.Google Scholar

Jarvella, R. J. and Klein, W., eds. 1982. Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics. Chichester.Google Scholar

Jong, I. 1985. “Eurykleia and Odysseus' Scar: Odyssey 19. 393–466.” Classical Quarterly 35: 517–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jong, I. 1987. Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. London.Google Scholar

Jong, I. and Nünlist, R.. 2004. “From Bird's Eye View to Close-up.” In Antike Literatur in neuer Deutung. Festschrift für Joachim Latacz, ed. Bierl, A., Schmitt, A., and Willi, A.. Leipzig: 63–83.Google Scholar

Jonson, B. 1976. Timber, or, Discoveries. Syracuse.Google Scholar

Jordan, H. 1905. Der Erzählungsstil in den Kampfscenen der Ilias. Breslau.Google Scholar

Jousse, M. 1925. Le Style oral rythmique et mnémotechnique chez les verbo-moteurs. Paris; Eng. trans.: The Oral Style, by E. Sienaert and R. Whitaker. New York, 1990.Google Scholar

Kahane, A. 2005. Diachronic Dialogues: Authority and Continuity in Homer and the Homeric Tradition. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar

Kakrides, J. T. 1949. Homeric Researches. Lund.Google Scholar

Kilmartin, M. 1975. “A Rhetorical Figure in Latin Historical Style.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 105: 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, G. S. 1968. “War and the Warrior in the Homeric Poems.” In Problèmes de la guerre en Grèce ancienne, ed. Vernant, J.-P.. Paris: 93–117.Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S. 1985. The Iliad: A Commentary, vol. i. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, G. S. 1990. The Iliad: A Commentary, vol. ii. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, W. 1982. “Local Deixis in Route Directions.” In Speech, Place, and Action, ed. Jarvella, R. and Klein, W.. Chichester: 161–82.Google Scholar

Krischer, T. 1971. Formale Konventionen der homerischen Epik. Munich.Google Scholar

Labrie, V. 1981. “The Itinerary as a Possible Memorized Form of the Folktale.” Scandinavian Yearbook of Folklore 37: 89–102.Google Scholar

Labrie, V. 1983. “Cartography and Graphic Analysis of the Physical Universe in the Odyssey Story.” Journal of Folklore Research 20: 219–42.Google Scholar

Lackner, M., ed. 1986. Das vergessene Gedächtnis: Die jesuitische mnemotechnische Abhandlung Xiguo Jifa: Übersetzung und Kommentar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Latacz, J. 1977. Kampfparänese, Kampfdarstellung und Kampfwirklichkeit in der Ilias, bei Kallinos und Tyrtaios. Zetemata 66. Munich.Google Scholar

Latacz, J. 2001. Troia und Homer. Der Weg zur Lösung eines alten Rätsels. Munich; Eng. trans.: Troy and Homer: Towards a Solution of an Old Mystery. Oxford, 2004.Google Scholar

Lateiner, D. 1995. The Sardonic Smile: Nonverbal Behavior in Homeric Epic. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leach, E. 1988. The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republican and Augustan Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Leaf, W. 1900–2. The Iliad. 2 vols. London.Google Scholar

Lendon, J. E. 2005. Soldiers and Ghosts: A History of Battle in Classical Antiquity. New Haven.Google Scholar

Lessing, G. F. n. d. Laokoon. In Lessings Werke in einem Band, ed. Stenzel, G.. Salzburg.

Létoublon, F. 1985. Il allait, pareil à la nuit. Paris.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. 1982. “Cognitive Styles in the Use of Spatial Direction Terms.” In Speech, Place, and Action, ed. Jarvella, R. and Klein, W.. Chichester: 251–68.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. 1934. “Der Richtungsbegriff in der Psychologie. Der spezielle und allgemeine hodologische Raum.” Psychologische Forschung 19: 249–99 = Kurt-Lewin-Werkausgabe, vol. iv: Feldtheorie, ed. Graumann, C.-F.. Stuttgart, 1982: 315–25.Google Scholar

Linde, C. and Labov, W.. 1975. “Spatial Networks as a Site of Language and Thought.” Language 51: 924–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lissarrague, F. 1990. “Around the Krater.” In Sympotica: A Symposium on the Symposion, ed. Murray, O.. Oxford: 196–209.Google Scholar

Lord, A. B. 1960. The Singer of Tales. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Lowe, N. J. 2000. The Classical Plot. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luce, J. V. 2003. “The Case for Historical Significance in Homer's Landmarks at Troia.” In Troia and the Troad: Scientific Approaches, ed. Wagner, G. A., Pernicka, E., and Uepermann, H.-P.. Berlin: 9–30.

Lynch, K. 1960. The Image of the City. Boston.Google Scholar

Lynn-George, M. 1988. Epos: Word, Narrative and the Iliad. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macdonald, D. A. 1978. “A Visual Memory.” Scottish Studies 22: 1–26.Google Scholar

Macdonald, D. A. 1981. “Some Aspects of Visual and Verbal Memory in Gaelic Storytelling.” Scandinavian Yearbook of Folklore 37: 117–24.Google Scholar

Mack, J. 2003. Museum of the Mind. London.Google Scholar

Mackie, H. 1997. “Song and Storytelling: An Odyssean Perspective.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 127: 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maitland, J. 1999. “Poseidon, Walls, and Narrative Complexity in the HomericIliad.” Classical Quarterly 49: 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manieri, A. 1998. L'immagine poetica nella teoria degli antichi: phantasia ed enargeia. Rome.Google Scholar

Mannsperger, B. 1993. “Das Dardanische Tor in der Ilias.” Studia Troica 3: 193–99.Google Scholar

Mannsperger, B. 1995. “Die Funktion des Grabens am Schiffslager der Achäer.” Studia Troica 5: 343–56.Google Scholar

Mannsperger, B. 1998. “Die Mauer am Schiffslager der Achaier.” Studia Troica 8: 287–304.Google Scholar

Mannsperger, B. 2001. “Das Stadtbild von Troia in der Ilias.” In Troia: Traum und Wirklichkeit. Darmstadt: 81–83.Google Scholar

Maronitis, D. N. 2004. Homeric Megathemes: War-Homilia-Homecoming, trans. D. Connoley. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar

Martin, R. 1989. The Language of Heroes. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Martin, R. 1997. “Similes and Performance.” In Written Voices, Spoken Signs, ed. Bakker, E. and Kahane, A.. Cambridge, MA: 138–66.Google Scholar

Mayrhofer, M. 1958–80. Kurzgefasstes etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindischen. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Mehmel, F. 1940. Virgil und Apollonius Rhodius: Untersuchungen über die Zeitvorstellung in der antiken epischen Erzählung. Hamburg.Google Scholar

Meijering, R. 1987. Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia. Groningen.Google Scholar

Mellink, M., ed. 1986. Troy and the Trojan War: A Symposium Held at Bryn Mawr College October 1984. Bryn Mawr, PA.Google Scholar

Merkelbach, R. 1960. “Aiante.” Glotta 38: 268–70.Google Scholar

Mette, H. 1960. “‘Schauen’ und ‘Staunen’.” Glotta 39: 49–71.Google Scholar

Mey, O. 1926. Das Schlachtfeld vor Troia: Eine Untersuchung. Berlin.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. 1956. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review 63: 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Minchin, E. 2001a. Homer and the Resources of Memory: Some Applications of Cognitive Theory to the Iliad and the Odyssey. Oxford.Google Scholar

Minchin, E. 2001b. “Similes in Homer: Image, Mind's Eye, and Memory.” In Speaking Volumes: Orality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman World, ed. Watson, Janet. Leiden: 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minchin, E. 2008. “Spatial Memory and the Composition of the Iliad.” In Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World, ed. Mackay, E. A.. Leiden: 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrison, J. V. 1994. “Thematic Inversion in the Iliad: The Greeks under Siege.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 35: 209–27.Google Scholar

Moulton, C. 1977. Similes in the Homeric Poems. Hypomnemata 49. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Mueller, M. 1984. The Iliad. London.Google Scholar

Mugler, C. 1960. “La lumière et la vision dans la poésie grecque,” Revue des Études Grecques 73: 40–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mugler, C. 1964. Dictionnaire historique de la terminologie optique des Grecs. Paris.Google Scholar

Müller, F. L. 1996. Kritische Gedanken zur antiken Mnemotechnik und zum Auctor ad Herennium. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Murray, O. 1994. “Nestor's Cup and the Origins of the Greek Symposion.” AION (archeol) n.s.: 47–54.

Nabokov, V. 1980. Lectures on Literature, ed. Bowers, F.. New York.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. 1979. The Best of the Achaeans. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. 1990a. Pindar's Homer. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. 1990b. “Sêma and Nóêsis: The Hero's Tomb and the ‘Reading’ of Symbols in Homer and Hesiod.” In Greek Mythology and Poetics. Ithaca: 202–22.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. 2004. Homer's Text and Language. Urbana.Google Scholar

Nannini, S. 2003. Analogia e polarità in similitudine: Paragoni iliadici e odissiaci a confronto. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Niens, C. 1987. Struktur und Dynamik in den Kamfszenen der Ilias. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Nünlist, R. 1998. “Der Homerische Erzähler und das sogenannte Sukzessionsgesetz.” Museum Helveticum 55: 2–8.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. 2001. “The Genre of Plataea.” In The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire, ed. Boedeker, D. and Sider, D.. Oxford: 65–85.Google Scholar

Olson, S. D. 1995. Blood and Iron: Stories and Storytelling in Homer's Odyssey. Leiden.Google Scholar

Page, D. 1959. History and the Homeric Iliad. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Pöhlmann, E. 1999. “Die Topographie der Troas in der Ilias: Fiktion und Realität.” Würzburger Jahrbücher für Altertumswissenschaft 23: 25–34.Google Scholar

Prévot, A. 1935. “Verbes grecs relatifs à la vision et noms de l'oeil,” Revue de Philologie 9: 133–60, 233–79.Google Scholar

Prier, R. A. 1989. Thauma idesthai: The Phenomenology of Sight and Appearance in Archaic Greek. Tallahassee.Google Scholar

Pritchett, W. K. 1985. The Greek State at War, vol. iv. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Purves, A. 2010. Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabel, R. 1991. “Agamemnon's Iliad.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 32: 103–17.Google Scholar

Rambaud, M. 1974. “L'espace dans le récit césarien.” In Littérature gréco-romaine et géographie historique: mélanges offerts à Roger Dion, ed. Chevallier, R.. Paris: 111–29.Google Scholar

Reece, S. 1995. “The Three Circuits of the Suitors: A Ring Composition in the Odyssey 17–22.” Oral Tradition 10: 207–29.Google Scholar

Reichel, R. 1994. Fernbeziehungen in der Ilias. Scripta Oralia 62. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, K. 1961. Die Ilias und ihr Dichter. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Rengakos, A. 1995. “Zeit und Gleichzeitigkeit in den homerischen Epen.” Antike und Abendland 41: 1–33.Google Scholar

Ribbeck, W. 1880. “Μάχης ἐπ᾿ ἀριστερά.” Rheinisches Museum 35: 610–26.Google Scholar

Richardson, N. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary, vol. vi. Cambridge.

Richardson, S. 1990. The Homeric Narrator. Nashville.Google Scholar

Risch, E. 1985. “Homerisch ἘΝΝΕΠΩ, lakonisch ἘΦΕΝΕΠΟΝΤΙ und die alte Erzählprosa.” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 60: 1–9.Google Scholar

Romagno, D. 2005. Il perfetto omerico. Milan.Google Scholar

Rossi, A. 2004. Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Rouveret, A. 1989. Histoire et imaginaire de la peinture ancienne. Rome.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. 1995. Memory in Oral Traditions: The Cognitive Psychology of Epic, Ballads, and Counting-out Rhymes. New York.Google Scholar

Ruijgh, C. J. 2004. “À propos des nouvelles tablettes de Thèbes 1.” Mnemosyne 57: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russo, J. A. and Simon, B.. 1968. “Homeric Psychology and the Oral Epic Tradition.” Journal of the History of Ideas 29: 483–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russo, J. A. and Simon, B.. 1976. “Is ‘Oral’ or ‘Aural’ Composition the Cause of Homer's Formulaic Style?” In Oral Literature and the Formula, ed. Stolz, B. and Shannon, R.. Ann Arbor: 31–54.Google Scholar

Ryan, M.-L. 2003. “Cognitive Maps and the Construction of Narrative Space.” In Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences, ed. Herman, D.. Stanford: 214–42.Google Scholar

Samuel, R. 1994. Theatres of Memory. 2 vols. London.Google Scholar

Sappok, C. 1970. Die Bedeutung des Raumes für die Struktur des Erzählwerks. Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schadewaldt, W. 1965a. Von Homers Welt und Werk. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Schadewaldt, W. 1965b. “Hektor und Andromache.” In Von Homers Welt und Werk. Stuttgart: 207–33.Google Scholar

Schadewaldt, W. 1966. Iliasstudien. Berlin.Google Scholar

Schröter, R. 1950. Die Aristie als Grundform homerischer Dichtung. Marburg.Google Scholar

Schuchhardt, C. 1928. “Die Befestigung des achäischen Schiffslagers vor Troja. In Festschrift zur Vierhundertjahrfeier des alten Gymnasiums zu Bremen 1528–1928. Bremen: 422–33.Google Scholar

Scodel, R. 2002. “Homeric Signs and Flashbulb Memory.” In Epea & Grammata: Oral and Written Communication in Ancient Greece, ed. Worthington, I. and Foley, J. M.. Leiden: 99–116.Google Scholar

Scodel, R. 2008. “Zielinski's Law Reconsidered.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 138: 107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, W. C. 1974. The Oral Nature of the Homeric Simile. Mnemosyne Suppl. 28. Leiden.Google Scholar

Scully, S. 1990. Homer and the Sacred City. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Seeck, G. 1998. “Homerisches Erzählen und das Problem der Gleichzeitigkeit.” Hermes 126: 131–44.Google Scholar

Shah, P. and Miyake, A.. 2005. The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shive, D. 1996. “Ομηρον ἐξ Ἀισχύλου σαϕηνίζειν: Iliad 7. 332–338 and Agamemnon 433–455.” Phoenix 50: 189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simondon, M. 1982. La memoire et l'oublie dans la pensée grecque jusqu'à la fin du Ve siècle avant J.-C. Paris.Google Scholar

Singor, H. W. 1991. “Nine against Troy.” Mnemosyne 44: 3–39.Google Scholar

Singor, H. W. 1992. “The Achaean Wall and the Seven Gates of Thebes.” Hermes 120: 401–11.Google Scholar

Singor, H. W. 1995. “Eni Prôtoisi Machesthai: Some Remarks on the Iliadic Image of the Battlefield.” In Homeric Questions, ed. Crielaard, J. P.. Amsterdam: 183–200.Google Scholar

Slatkin, L. 2007. “Tragic Visualizing in the Iliad.” In Visualizing the Tragic: Drama, Myth, and Ritual in Greek Art and Literature, Essays in Honour of Froma Zeitlin, ed. Kraus, C., S. Goldhill, H. P. Foley, and J. Elsner. Oxford: 19–34.Google Scholar

Small, J. P. 1997. Wax Tablets of the Mind: Cognitive Studies of Memory and Literacy in Antiquity. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snell, B. 1924. Die Ausdrücke für den Begriff des Wissens in der vorplatonische Philosophie. Philologische Untersuchungen 29. Berlin.Google Scholar

Snell, B. 1953. The Discovery of the Mind, trans. T. Rosenmeyer. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Spence, J. D. 1984. The Memory Palace of Matteo Ricci. New York.Google Scholar

Stanley, K. 1993. The Shield of Homer. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinhoff, H.-H. 1964. Die Darstellung gleichzeitiger Geschehnisse im mittelhochdeutschen Epos. Munich.Google Scholar

Sternberg, M. 1978. Expositional Modes and Temporal Ordering in Fiction. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Taplin, O. 1992. Homeric Soundings: The Shaping of theIliad. Oxford.Google Scholar

Telegdi, Zs. 1977. “Zur Bedeutungsentwicklung von ΣΗΜΑ, ΣΗΜΕΙΟΝ und ΣΗΜΑΙΝΕΙΝ.” Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 25: 377–382.Google Scholar

Thornton, A. 1984. Homer's Iliad: Its Composition and the Motif of Supplication. Hypomnemata 81. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Trachsel, A. 2007. La Troade: un paysage et son héritage littéraire. Les commentaires antiques sur la Troade, leur genèse et leur influence. Bibliotheca Helvetica Romana 28. BaselGoogle Scholar

Troia: Traum und Wirklichkeit. 2001. Exhibition catalogue. Darmstadt.

Tsagarakis, O. 1969. “The Achaean Wall and the Homeric Question.” Hermes 97: 129–35.Google Scholar

Tsagarakis, O. 1988. Form and Content in Homer. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Ulf, C., ed. 2003. Der Neue Streit um Troia: Eine Bilanz. Munich.Google Scholar

Valk, M. L. 1963. Researches on the Text and Scholia of the Iliad. 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar

Wees, H. 1986. “Leaders of Men? Military Organization in the Iliad.” Classical Quarterly 36: 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wees, H. 1994a. “The Homeric Way of War: The Iliad and the Hoplite Phalanx (1).” Greece and Rome 41: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wees, H. 1994b. “The Homeric Way of War: The Iliad and the Hoplite Phalanx (2).” Greece and Rome 41: 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wees, H. 1997. “Homeric Warfare.” In A New Companion to Homer, ed. Morris, I. and Powell, B.. Leiden: 668–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasaly, A. 1993. Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Vega, M. de, Cocude, M., M. Denis, M. J. Rodrigo, and H. D. Zimmer. 2001. “The Interface between Language and Visuo-spatial Representations.” In Imagery, Language and Visuo-spatial Thinking, ed. Denis, M., Logie, R. L., C. Cornoldo, M. de Vega, and J. Engelkamp. Philadelphia: 109–36.Google Scholar

Vernant, J. P. 1965. “Aspects mythiques de la mémoire et du temps.” In Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs. Paris: 80–107.Google Scholar

Visser, E. 1987. Homerische Versifikationstechnik: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Visser, E. 1995. Homers Katalog der Schiffe. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Wackernagel, J. 1877. “Zum homerischen Dual,” Kuhns Zeitschrift 23: 302–10 = Kleine Schriften. Göttingen (1953): 538–46.Google Scholar

Walker, A. D. 1993. “Enargeia in Greek Historiography.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 123: 353–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webb, R. 1997. “Mémoire et imagination: les limites de l'enargeia dans la théorie rhétorique grecque.” In Dire l'evidence (philosophie et rhétorique antiques), ed. Lévy, C. and Pernot, L.. Paris: 229–48.Google Scholar

Weçowski, M. 2002. “Homer and the Origins of the Symposion.” In Omero tremila anni dopo, ed. Montinari, F.. Rome: 625–37.Google Scholar

West, M. L. 1969. “The Achaean Wall.” Classical Philology 19: 255–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitman, C. H. 1958. Homer and the Heroic Tradition. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitman, C. H. and Scodel, R.. 1981. “Sequence and Simultaneity in Iliad Ν, Ξ, and Ο.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 85: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Willcock, M. M. 1977. “Ad Hoc Invention in the Iliad.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 81: 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Willcock, M. M. 1978. Homer: Iliad 1–12. London.Google Scholar

Willcock, M. M. 1984. Homer: Iliad 13–24. London.Google Scholar

Willcock, M. M. 1987. “The Final Scenes of Iliadxvii.” In Homer: Beyond Oral Poetry, ed. Bremer, J. M., Jong, I., and Kalff, J.. Amsterdam: 185–94.Google Scholar

Willcock, M. M. 1993. “The Fighting in the Iliad,” ΣΠΟΝΔΕΣ ΣΤΟΝ ΟΜΗΡΟ: από τα Πρακτικά του ζ᾽ Συνεδρίου για την Οδύσσεια (2–5 Σεπτεμβρίου 1990). Ithaca: 141–47.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. 2002. Ransom, Revenge, and Heroic Identity in the Iliad. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winkler, M. 2007. Troy: From Homer's Iliad to Hollywood Epic. Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Winter, F. 1956. Die Kampfszenen in den Gesängen M N O der Ilias. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. 1989. “Virgil the Historian: Aeneid 8. 626–62 and Livy.” In Studies in Latin Literaure and its Tradition in Honour of C. O. Brink, ed. Diggle, J., Hall, J. B., and Jocelyn, H. D.. Cambridge Philological Society Supplement 15: 132–45.Google Scholar

Yamagata, N. 1989. “The Apostrophe in Homer as Part of Oral Technique.” Bulletin of the Institute for Classical Studies 36: 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yates, F. A. 1966. The Art of Memory. Chicago.Google Scholar

Zanker, G. 1981. “Enargeia in the Ancient Criticism of Poetry.” Rheinisches Museum 124: 297–311.Google Scholar

Zielinski, T. 1899–1901. “Die Behandlung gleichzeitiger Ereignisse im antiken Epos.” Philologus Suppl. 8.3: 407–49.Google Scholar

Zoran, G. 1984. “Towards a Theory of Space in Narrative.” Poetics Today 5: 309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar