Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:22:39.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Institutionalization of Elite Management in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2009

Barry J. Naughton
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Dali L. Yang
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

Since the late 1980s, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has weathered a series of crises but continues to dominate the Chinese political scene. Although the CCP has laid out rules and procedures over the past decade to govern its own activities and to clarify its relationship with other political institutions, this process of institutionalization remains partial and very much incomplete. Moreover, the party's willingness to submit itself to binding rules may ultimately conflict with its mission to guide and transform all of society. However, the CCP's ability to initiate a process of institutionalization has been a key source of its political resilience since the early 1990s. The strength of the CCP, in turn, has been an important factor contributing to national stability and unity.

Because Chinese politics has long been regarded as essentially informal, much attention has been devoted to how extra institutional factors, such as a certain political figure or a network of politicians, exert decisive influence on Chinese politics. An analysis of formal institutions, with a few exceptions, has largely been neglected. Consequently, even though China's economic achievements in the past two and a half decades have been widely acknowledged, the development of political institutions during the same period has not been fully analyzed. Yet these political institutions are an integral part of Chinese politics, and the substantial changes undergone by Chinese political institutions are a reflection of the broader political shifts within China itself. In the history of the People's Republic of China, leaders have used institutions to achieve very different political objectives.

Type
Chapter
Information
Holding China Together
Diversity and National Integration in the Post-Deng Era
, pp. 70 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×