Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T13:59:26.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Roger E. Backhouse
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Philippe Fontaine
Affiliation:
Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan
Get access

Summary

The Social Sciences and Their Histories

In the past decade or so, there have been a number of retrospective surveys of the histories of the social sciences. For instance, to mark the centenary of the American Political Science Association, the American Political Science Review, widely viewed as the premier scholarly research journal in that field, published a centennial issue of some twenty-five articles on the “evolution of political science” with special emphasis on the period since the Second World War. Likewise, to celebrate its hundredth anniversary, the American Sociological Association sponsored Sociology in America (Calhoun 2007), a 900-page volume that, as one reviewer (Geary 2008) put it, placed more emphasis on the history of the discipline than on its current state. These volumes attest to the depth of research being undertaken on the history of these disciplines; however, interest in the histories of other disciplines may be less. For example, the American Economic Association did not choose to mark its centenary two decades ago in a similar way, and it seems unlikely that its leading journal, the American Economic Review, will devote an issue to historical reflection on its first hundred years. Nonetheless, there is a significant amount of work being undertaken on the recent history of the discipline.

Historical work on what Ross (1993, p. 99) has called the “core social sciences in the U.S.” has been undertaken, despite the fact that history has increasingly been seen as irrelevant to the shaping of theory.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adcock, Robert and Bevir, Mark. 2005. The History of Political Science. Political Studies Review 3.1:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Daniel. 1982. The Social Sciences since the Second World War. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard. 1963. Introduction to the Behavioral Sciences. In Berelson, B., ed., The Behavioral Sciences Today. New York and London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Michael A. 2001. A Perilous Progress: Economists and Public Purpose in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 1992. Sociology, Other Disciplines, and the Project of a General Understanding of Social Life. In Halliday, Terence C. and Janowitz, Morris, eds., Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collini, S. ed. 2007. Sociology in America: A History. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Camic, Charles. 1989. Structure after 50 years: The Anatomy of a Charter. American Journal of Sociology 95.1:38–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capshew, James H. 1999. Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Cole, Jamie. 2007. Instituting the Science of Mind: Intellectual Economies and Disciplinary Exchange at Harvard's Center for Cognitive Studies. British Journal for the History of Science 40.4:567–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collini, S. 1985. What is Intellectual History?History Today 35.10:46–8.Google Scholar
Collini, S. 1988. “Discipline History” and “Intellectual History”: Reflections on the Historiography of the Social Sciences in Britain and France. Revue de synthèse 3.4:388–99.Google Scholar
Crane, Diana and Small, Henry. 1992. American Sociology since the Seventies: The Emerging Identity Crisis in the Discipline. In Halliday, Terence C. and Janowitz, Morris, eds., Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crowther-Heyck, Hunter. 2006. Patrons of the Revolution. Ideals and Institutions in the Postwar Behavioral Science. Isis 97.3:420–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farr, James. 2003. Political Science. In Porter, T. M. and Ross, D., eds., The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 7 (The Modern Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geary, Daniel. 2008. Every Social Scientist Her Own Historian. Modern Intellectual History 5.2:399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Scott. 1991. The History and Philosophy of Social Science. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbron, , Johan, , Guilhot, Nicolas and Jeanpierre, Laurent. 2008. Toward a Transnational History of the Social Sciences. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 44.2:146–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollinger, David A. 1997. The Disciplines and the Identity Debates, 1970–1995. Dædalus 126:333–51.Google Scholar
Isaac, Joel. 2007. The Human Sciences in Cold War America. Historical Journal 50.3:725–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 1997. From the Street to the Lecture Hall: The 1960s. Dædalus 126:311–32.Google Scholar
Kenny, Michael. 2004. The Case for Disciplinary History: Political Studies in the 1950s and 1960s. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6.4:565–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. 1951. The Policy Orientation. In Lerner, D. and Lasswell, H.D., eds., The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Monkkonen, Erich H., ed. 1994. Engaging the Past: The Uses of History across the Social Sciences. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
Nichols, Lawrence T. 1998. Social Relations Undone: Disciplinary Divergence and Departmental Politics at Harvard, 1946–1970. American Sociologist 29.2:83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Theodore M. and Ross, Dorothy, eds. 2003. The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 7 (The Modern Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prewitt, Kenneth. 2005. The Two Projects of the American Social Sciences. Social Research 72.1:219–36.Google Scholar
Robic, Marie-Claire. 2003. Geography. In Porter, T.M and Ross, D., eds., The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 7 (The Modern Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy. 1993. An Historian's View of American Social Science. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 29.2:99–112.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schorske, Carl E. 1997. The New Rigorism in the Human Sciences. Dædalus 126:289–309.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. 2005. The Political Unconscious of Social and Cultural History, or, Confessions of a Former Quantitative Historian. In Steinmetz, G., ed., The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Roger. 1997. The Fontana History of the Human Sciences. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. Still Blowing in the Wind: The American Quest for a Democratic, Scientific Political Science. Dædalus, 126:253–87.Google Scholar
Steuer, Max. 2003. The Scientific Study of Society. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Roger E. Backhouse, University of Birmingham, Philippe Fontaine, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan
  • Book: The History of the Social Sciences since 1945
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845260.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Roger E. Backhouse, University of Birmingham, Philippe Fontaine, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan
  • Book: The History of the Social Sciences since 1945
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845260.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Roger E. Backhouse, University of Birmingham, Philippe Fontaine, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan
  • Book: The History of the Social Sciences since 1945
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845260.003
Available formats
×