Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- PART I 1760–1920
- PART II 1920–1950
- PART III 1950–1972
- PART IV 1972–1990
- 16 From Hiruharama to Hataitai: The Domestication of New Zealand Poetry, 1972–1990
- 17 The Novel, the Short Story, and the Rise of a New Reading Public, 1972–1990
- 18 ‘DBed and chocolate wheaten beaten’: Drama Defining the Nation, 1972–1990
- 19 The Māori Renaissance from 1972
- PART V 1990–2014
- Index
16 - From Hiruharama to Hataitai: The Domestication of New Zealand Poetry, 1972–1990
from PART IV - 1972–1990
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2016
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- PART I 1760–1920
- PART II 1920–1950
- PART III 1950–1972
- PART IV 1972–1990
- 16 From Hiruharama to Hataitai: The Domestication of New Zealand Poetry, 1972–1990
- 17 The Novel, the Short Story, and the Rise of a New Reading Public, 1972–1990
- 18 ‘DBed and chocolate wheaten beaten’: Drama Defining the Nation, 1972–1990
- 19 The Māori Renaissance from 1972
- PART V 1990–2014
- Index
Summary
James K. Baxter died of a heart attack on 22 October 1972 in the Auckland suburb of Glenfield. It was an unlikely, though not unfitting, location for the prophet against normality to quit the ordinary world that he had so imaginatively created and biblically lambasted. He had been driven to a doctor in one of those suburbs thrown up by postwar affluence, later collapsing on the doorstep. He sought help at a nearby house and died there among the suburbanites he had condemned for the spiritual emptiness of their materially comfortable lives.
Looking back on Baxter's legacy a decade later, the maverick young Auckland poet, Leigh Davis, who committed the Baxterian sin of taking a university degree and made it mortal by choosing a career in finance, playfully claimed that his generation's distance from Baxter's was one of marketing and outward presentation:
You're a big ghost, Jim St John,
nice sheen on your forehead and noseridge's catchy,
spread over the billboard, nine years later ..
I was in the mind for Jerusalem, but early Willy's like
a 1972 Listener. Barefoot for forty miles in the rain,
kenosis, (who were you reading?) ..
Then our literati were known for their sandals,
their misery & & talent, leisure, demography,
capital, markets, blew old icons up
into large collected poems, where the audience knew
the hagiography, or were instructed: ‘What is the inward
part, or thing signified? The Body of Christ, taken indeed ..’
Who was Gaudier-Brzeska? (For what Willy assumes
you shall assume, take it upon yourself).
But, of course, Baxter's presence in our literary and cultural memory involves more than his theatrical adoption of a mendicant style of dress. Over the two decades covered in this chapter, although his literary aura inevitably dimmed and flickered, he remained inescapable, as Fleur Adcock implied he would in her ‘In Memoriam: James K. Baxter’ (1974). Here, she gives her friend and near-contemporary a send-off that, while witty and sometimes irreverent, nevertheless finds its way to the correct elegiac conclusion:
What can I do
now, when [death] has become your own condition,
but praise all that you gave to the tradition?
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A History of New Zealand Literature , pp. 227 - 245Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016