Book contents
- Gynecologic Care
- Gynecologic Care
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Basic Gynecologic Care Issues
- Section 2 Gynecologic Surgery
- Section 3 Infertility
- Section 4 Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
- Section 5 Gynecologic Oncology
- Section 6 General Considerations
- 38 Patient Safety in Gynecologic Care
- 39 Essentials of Practice Management
- 40 Ob-Gyn and the Law
- 41 Physicians and Healthcare Systems
- 42 Evidence-Based Medicine
- 43 Cultural Competency
- 44 Physician Health
- 45 Medical Ethics
- Index
- References
38 - Patient Safety in Gynecologic Care
from Section 6 - General Considerations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 February 2018
Book contents
- Gynecologic Care
- Gynecologic Care
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Basic Gynecologic Care Issues
- Section 2 Gynecologic Surgery
- Section 3 Infertility
- Section 4 Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
- Section 5 Gynecologic Oncology
- Section 6 General Considerations
- 38 Patient Safety in Gynecologic Care
- 39 Essentials of Practice Management
- 40 Ob-Gyn and the Law
- 41 Physicians and Healthcare Systems
- 42 Evidence-Based Medicine
- 43 Cultural Competency
- 44 Physician Health
- 45 Medical Ethics
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Gynecologic Care , pp. 371 - 380Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Leape, L.. Scope of problem and history of patient safety. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2008; 35: 1–10.Google Scholar
Kohn, K.T., Corrigan, J.M., Donaldson, M.S., eds. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC. National Academy Press. 2000.Google Scholar
Gluck, P.. Medical error theory. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2008; 35: 11–17.Google Scholar
Reason, J.. The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 1990; 327 (1241): 475–84.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion, No. 447. 2009. Patient safety in obstetrics and gynecology. Reaffirmed 2015.Google Scholar
Nielsen, P., Mann, S.. Team function in obstetrics to reduce errors and improve outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2008; 35: 81–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sentinel event alert #30. 2004, The Joint Commission. Available at www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/SEA_30.PDFGoogle Scholar
Woolf, S.H., Kuzel, A.J., Dovey, S.M., Phillips, R.L.. A string of mistakes: the importance of cascade analysis in describing, counting, and preventing medical errors. Annals of Family Medicine. 2004; 2(4): 317–26.Google Scholar
Not all recommended fraud safeguards have been implemented in hospital EHR technology, Office of the Inspector General. 2013. Available at www.aapc.com/blog/29747-cloning-address-the-elephant-in-the-room/Google Scholar
Carranza, L., Lyerly, A.D., Lipira, L. et al. Delivering the truth: challenges and opportunities for error disclosure in obstetrics. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 123(3): 656–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behaviors that undermine a culture of safety. Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert. 2008 (40). Available at www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/SentinelEventAlerts/sea_40.htmGoogle Scholar
Implementing an effective FPPE process. Credentialing Resource Center Insider. 2007. Available at www.hcpro.com/content.cfm?content_id=76987.Google Scholar
Mann, S., Pratt, S.. Role of clinician involvement in patient safety in obstetrics and gynecology. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010; 53(3): 559–75.Google Scholar
Lichtmacher, A.. Quality assessment tools: ACOG voluntary review of quality care program, peer review reporting system. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2008. 35: 147–62.Google Scholar
Goldman, R.L., Ciesco, E.. Improving peer review: alternatives to unstructured judgments by a single reviewer. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement. 1996; 22: 762–9.Google Scholar
Sclafani, J., Levy, B., Lawrence, H., Saraco, M.. Building a better safety net: taking the safety agenda to office-based women’s health. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; 120(2): 355–9.Google Scholar
Pearlman, M.. Patient safety in obstetrics and gynecology: an agenda for the future. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006; 108(5): 1266–71.Google Scholar
Information available at http://mitss.org/clinicians_home.htmlGoogle Scholar
Moffatt-Bruce, S.D., Funai, E.F., Nash, M., Gabbe, S.G.. Patient safety strategies: are we on the same team? Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; 120(4): 743–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Argani, C.H., Eichelberger, M., Deering, S., Satin, A.J.. Patient safety series: the case for simulation as part of a comprehensive patient safety program. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Expert Reviews. 2012; 451–5.Google Scholar