Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Gramsci and global politics: towards a post-hegemonic research agenda
- PART I PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEORETICAL REFLECTIONS
- 1 Epistemology, ontology, and the ‘Italian School’
- 2 Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method
- 3 Alienation, capitalism and the inter-state system: toward a Marxian/Gramscian critique
- 4 Global hegemony and the structural power of capital
- PART II PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
- References
- Index
- Titles in the series
2 - Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 January 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Gramsci and global politics: towards a post-hegemonic research agenda
- PART I PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEORETICAL REFLECTIONS
- 1 Epistemology, ontology, and the ‘Italian School’
- 2 Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method
- 3 Alienation, capitalism and the inter-state system: toward a Marxian/Gramscian critique
- 4 Global hegemony and the structural power of capital
- PART II PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
- References
- Index
- Titles in the series
Summary
Some time ago I began reading Gramsci's Prison Notebooks. In these fragments, written in a fascist prison between 1929 and 1935, the former leader of the Italian Communist Party was concerned with the problem of understanding capitalist societies in the 1920s and 1930s, and particularly with the meaning of fascism and the possibilities of building an alternative form of state and society based on the working class. What he had to say centred upon the state, upon the relationship of civil society to the state, and upon the relationship of politics, ethics and ideology to production. Not surprisingly, Gramsci did not have very much to say directly about international relations. Nevertheless, I found that Gramsci's thinking was helpful in understanding the meaning of international organisation with which I was then principally concerned. Particularly valuable was his concept of hegemony, but valuable also were several related concepts which he had worked out for himself or developed from others. This essay sets forth my understanding of what Gramsci meant by hegemony and these related concepts, and suggests how I think they may be adapted, retaining his essential meaning, to the understanding of problems of world order. It does not purport to be a critical study of Gramsci's political theory but merely a derivation from it of some ideas useful for a revision of current international relations theory.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1993
- 117
- Cited by