Aquinas, Thomas. In XIII libros Physicorum Aristotelis expositio. Edited by Maggiolo, M.. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1954.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima. Translated by Kenelm Foster and Sylvester Humphries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics. Translated by John P. Rowan. Notre Dame: Dumb Ox Books, 1995.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics, 2 vols. Translated by C. I. Litzinger. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1964.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle's Physics. Translated by Richard J. Blackwell, Richard J. Spath, and W. Edmund Thirlkel. Revised edition with introduction by Vernon J. Burke and foreword by Ralph McInerny. Notre Dame: Dumb Ox Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle's Posterior Analytics. Translated by Jean T. Oesterle. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Book of Causes. Translated by Vincent A. Guagliardo, Charles R. Hess, and Richard C. Taylor. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew. In Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, vols. 33–34. Translated by Jeremy Holmes and Beth Mortensen. Edited by The Aquinas Institute. Lander: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2013.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Gospel of St. John, 3 vols. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher and James A. Weisheipl. Introduction and Notes by Daniel Keating and Matthew Levering. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Letters of Saint Paul to the Corinthians. In Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 38. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher, Beth Mortensen, and Daniel Keating. Edited by Mortensen, John and Alarcón, Enrique. Lander: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Letters of Saint Paul to the Galatians and Ephesians. In Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 39. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher, and Matthew Lamb. Edited by Mortensen, John and Alarcón, Enrique. Lander: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Letter of Saint Paul to the Hebrews. In Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 41. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher. Edited by Mortensen, John and Alarcón, Enrique. Lander: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Letters of Saint Paul to the Philippians, Colossians, Thessalonians, Timothy, Titus, and Philemon. In Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 40. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher. Edited by Mortensen, John and Alarcón, Enrique. Lander: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Letter of Saint Paul to the Romans. In Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 37. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher. Edited by Mortensen, John and Alarcón, Enrique. Lander: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Compendium of Theology. Translated by Richard J. Regan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. De potentia Dei. Edited by Pession, P. M.. In Quaestiones disputatae, vol. 2. Edited by Spiazi, R.. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1965.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. De veritate. In Sancti Thomae de Aquino opera Omnia, vol. 22. Leonine Edition. Rome: Editori di San Tommaso, 1975–76.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. The Disputed Questions onTruth, 3 vols. Translated by R. Schmidt. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1954.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In duodecem libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio. Edited by Pera, Ceslai. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1950.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Exposition of Aristotle's Treatise On the Heavens. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher and Pierre H. Conway. Columbus: College of St. Mary of the Springs, 1964.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In librum beati Dionysii de divinis expositio. Edited by Pera, Ceslai. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1950.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. On Creation [Quaestiones Disputatae de Potentia Dei, Q. 3]. Translated with introduction by Susan C. Selner-Wright. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. On the Power of God, 3 vols. Translated by the English Dominican Province. London: Burns, Oates, and Washbourne, 1932–4.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In Psalmos Davidis expositio. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis opera Omnia, vol. 14. Parma: Typis Petri Fiaccadori, 1963.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quodlibetal Questions 1 and 2. Translated by Sandra Edwards. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1983.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum magistri Petri Lombardi episcopi Parisiensis, vols. 1–2. Edited by Mandonnet, P.. Paris: Lethielleux, 1929, vols. 3–4. Edited by Moos, M.. Paris: P. Lethielleux, 1933–47.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Sententia libri De Anima. Edited by Pirotta, A. M.. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1959.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Sententia libri Ethicorum. In Sancti Thomae de Aquino opera Omnia, vol. 47/1–2. Edited by Gauthier, R.-A.. Rome: Ad Sanctae Sabinae, 1969.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra Gentiles, 4 vols. Translated by A. Pegis, J. Anderson, V. J. Burke, and C. J. O'Neil. Garden City: Doubleday, 1955–6.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae. Edited and translated by Thomas Gilby, et al. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964–81. Reprinted by Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Translated by the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Brothers, 1947.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Super Evangelium S. Joannis Lectura. Edited by Cai, R.. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1952.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Thomas Aquinas: The Academic Sermons. Translated by Mark-Robin Hoogland. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Thomas Aquinas: Selected Writings. Translated by Ralph McInerny. London: Penguin Books, 1998.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Anselm: Fides quaerens intellectum. Anselm's Proof of the Existence of God in the Context of his Theological Scheme. Translated by Ian W. Robertson. London: SCM Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics, vols. I–IV. Edited by Bromiley, Geoffrey W. and Torrance, Thomas F.. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley et al. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1956–75.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Credo. Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 2005.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Credo: Die Hauptprobleme der Dogmatik, dargestellt im Anschluss an das Apostolische Glaubensbekenntnis. München: TVZ, 1935.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Die kirchliche Dogmatik, vols. I–IV. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 1980.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. The Epistle to the Romans, 6th edn. Translated by Edwyn C. Hoskins. London: Oxford University Press, 1933.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Erklärungen des Epheser- und des Jakobusbriefes 1919–1929. Edited by Bohnet, Jörg-Michael. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2009.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Erklärung des Johannesevangeliums. Edited by Fürst, Walther. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 1999.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Evangelical Theology: An Introduction. Translated by Foley Grover. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1963.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. “Fate and Idea in Theology.” In The Way of Theology in Karl Barth: Essays and Comments. Translated by George Hunsinger. Edited by Rumscheidt, H. Martin. Allison Park: Pickwick, 1986.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Gespräche 1964–1968. Edited by Busch, Eberhard. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 1996.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. The Göttingen Dogmatics: Instruction in the Christian Religion. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. The Humanity of God. Translated by Thomas Weiser and John Newton Thomas. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Karl Barth's Table Talk. Edited by Godsey, John D.. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1963.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. The Knowledge of God and the Service of God According to the Teaching of the Reformation. Translated by J. L. M. Hare and Ian Henderson. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1938.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. The Theology of John Calvin. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Vorträge und kleinere Arbeiten 1925–1930. Edited by Schmidt, Hermann. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 1994.Google Scholar

Acar, Rahim. Talking about God and Talking about Creation: Avicenna's and Thomas Aquinas’ Positions. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar

Adams, Nicholas. Eclipse of Grace: Divine and Human Action in Hegel. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar

Adams, Robert Merrihew. “Theories of Actuality.” In The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality. Edited by Loux, Michael J., 190–209. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Aertsen, Jan A. Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals: The Case of Thomas Aquinas. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar

Alsted, Johan-Heinrich. Metaphysica, Tribus Libris Tractata. Herbornae Nassoviorum, 1613.Google Scholar

Anatolios, Khaled. Retrieving Nicaea: The Development and Meaning of Trinitarian Doctrine. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2011.Google Scholar

Anderson, James F. “Creation as a Relation.” New Scholasticism 24 (1950): 263–83.Google Scholar

Anselm, , Monologion and Proslogion. In Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works. Edited by Davies, Brian and Evans, G. R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library 73. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . On the Heavens. Translated by W. K. C. Guthrie. Loeb Classical Library 338. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1939.Google Scholar

Asbill, Brian D. The Freedom of God for Us: Karl Barth's Doctrine of Divine Aseity. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar

Asselt, Willem J. van, Bac, J. Martin, and Velde, Roelf T. te, eds. Reformed Thought on Freedom: The Concept of Free Choice in Early Modern Reformed Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2010.Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo. De civitate Dei. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 47–48. Edited by Dombart, B. and Kalb, A.. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 1955.Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo. De trinitate libri XV. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 50. Edited by Mountain, W. J. and Glorie, F.. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 1968. Reprinted 2001.Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo. The Trinity (de Trinitate). Translated by Edmund Hill. Hyde Park: New City Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Ayres, Lewis. Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Balthasar, Hans Urs von. The Glory of the Lord: A Theological Aesthetics, vol. 4, The Realm of Metaphysics in Antiquity. Edited by Riches, John. Translated by Brian McNeil, et al. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1989.Google Scholar

Balthasar, Hans Urs von. The Theology of Karl Barth: Exposition and Interpretation. Translated by Edward T. Oakes. San Francisco: Ignatius, 1992.Google Scholar

Barnes, Corey L. “Aristotle in the Summa Theologiae's Christology.” In Aristotle in Aquinas’ Theology. Edited by Emery, Gilles and Levering, Matthew, 186–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Barnes, Corey L. “Ordered to the Good: Final Causality and Analogical Predication in Thomas Aquinas.” Modern Theology 30.4 (2014): 433–53.Google Scholar

Barnes, Michel René. “Oeconomia.” In Encyclopedia of Early Christianity. Edited by Ferguson, Everett, McHugh, Michael P., and Norris, Frederick W., vol. 2: L–Z, 825–7. New York: Garland, 1997.Google Scholar

Barnes, Michel René. The Power of God: Dynamis in Gregory of Nyssa's Trinitarian Theology. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Barnett, William T. “Actualism and Beauty: Karl Barth's Insistence on the Auch in his Account of Divine Beauty.” Scottish Journal of Theology 66.3 (2013): 299–318.Google Scholar

Basil of Caesarea, Against Eunomius. Translated by Mark DelCogliano and Andrew Radde-Gallwitz. In The Fathers of the Church, vol. 122. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Bauerschmidt, Frederick Christian. Thomas Aquinas: Faith, Reason, and Following Christ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Bavinck, Herman. Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 2, God and Creation. Edited by Bolt, John. Translated by John Vriend. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004.Google Scholar

Behr, John. The Nicene Faith: True God of True God. The Formation of Christian Theology, vol. 2, part 1. Crestwood: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Beintker, Michael. “… alles Andere als ein Parergon: Fides quaerens intellectum.” In Karl Barth in Deutschland (1921–1935). Edited by Beintker, Michael, Link, Christian, and Trowitzsch, Michael, 99–120. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2005.Google Scholar

Beintker, Michael. “Analogy.” In The Westminster Handbook to Karl Barth. Edited by Burnett, Richard, 3–6. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2013.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick. Hegel. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Bengel, Johann Albrecht. Gnomon of the New Testament. Edited by Bengel, M. Ernest and Steudel, J. C. F.. Translated by James Bryce, 3 vols. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1860.Google Scholar

Blankenhorn, Bernard. “The Good as Self-Diffusive in Thomas Aquinas.” Angelicum 79 (2002): 803–37.Google Scholar

Blankenhorn, Bernard. “The Place of Romans 6 in Aquinas's Doctrine of Sacramental Causality: A Balance of History and Metaphysics.” In Ressourcement Thomism: Sacred Doctrine, the Sacraments, and the Moral Life. Edited by Hütter, Reinhard and Levering, Matthew, 136–49. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Bonino, Serge-Thomas. “La simplicité de Dieu.” In Istituto San Tommaso: Studi 1996. Edited by Lorenz, Dietrich, 117–51. Rome: Pontificia Università San Tommaso, 1997.Google Scholar

Boulnois, Olivier. “Libertas indifferentiae: Figures de la liberté d'indifférence au Moyen Age.” In Mots médiévaux offerts à Ruedi Imbach. Edited by Atucha, A., et al., 405–18. Porto, Turnhout: Brepols Publisher, 2011.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Brouwer, Rinse H. Reeling. Karl Barth and Post-Reformation Orthodoxy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar

Brown, Robert F. “Schelling and Dorner on Divine Immutability.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 53.2 (1985): 237–49.Google Scholar

Buckley, Michael J. Motion and Motion's God: Thematic Variations in Aristotle, Cicero, Newton, and Hegel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Burrell, David B. Karl Barth: His Life from Letters and Autobiographical Texts. Translated by John Bowden. London: SCM Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Burrell, David B. Aquinas: God and Action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.Google Scholar

Burrell, David B. Faith and Freedom: An Interfaith Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, Eberhard. The Great Passion: An Introduction to Karl Barth's Theology. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar

Chavannes, Henry. The Analogy between God and the World in St. Thomas Aquinas and Karl Barth. Translated by William Lumley. New York: Vantage Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Coakley, Sarah. God, Sexuality and the Self: An Essay ‘On the Trinity’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Coffey, Brian. “The Notion of Order According to St. Thomas Aquinas.” The Modern Schoolman 27.1 (1949): 1–18.Google Scholar

Collins, Paul M. Trinitarian Theology, West and East: Karl Barth, the Cappadocian Fathers and John Zizioulas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Cremer, Hermann. Biblico-Theological Lexicon of New Testament Greek. Translated by William Urwick. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1895.Google Scholar

Cremer, Hermann. The Christian Doctrine of the Divine Attributes. Edited by Burkhardt, Helmut. Translated by Robert B. Price. Eugene: Pickwick, 2016.Google Scholar

Cross, Richard. Duns Scotus on God. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar

Couenhoven, Jesse. “Karl Barth's Conception(s) of Human and Divine Freedom(s).” In Commanding Grace: Studies in Karl Barth's Ethics. Edited by Migliore, Daniel L., 239–55. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar

Courtenay, William J. Ockham and Ockhamism: Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of His Thought. Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, vol. 99. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar

Cuddeback, Matthew. “Light and Form in St. Thomas Aquinas's Metaphysics of the Knower.” PhD dissertation, The Catholic University of America, 1998.Google Scholar

Cuddeback, Matthew. “Thomas Aquinas on Divine Illumination and the Authority of the First Truth.” Nova et Vetera (English Edition) 7.3 (2009): 579–602.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Mary Kathleen. What Is Theological Exegesis? Interpretation and Use of Scripture in Barth's Doctrine of Election. Valley Forge: Trinity Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Daferth, Ingolf U. Becoming Present: An Inquiry into the Christian Sense of the Presence of God. Leuven, Paris, Dudley: Peeters, 2006.Google Scholar

Daferth, Ingolf U. “Possibile absolutum: The Theological Discovery of the Ontological Priority of the Possible.” In Rethinking the Medieval Legacy for Contemporary Theology. Edited by Min, Anselm K., 91–129. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2014.Google Scholar

de Finance, Joseph. Être et agir dans la philosophie de saint Thomas, 3rd edn. Rome: Université Grégorienne, 1965.Google Scholar

Dempsey, Michael T., ed. Trinity and Election in Contemporary Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar

Desmond, William. Hegel's God: A Counterfeit Double? Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar

Dewan, Lawrence. Form and Being: Studies in Thomistic Metaphysics. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Dewan, Lawrence. “St. Thomas and the Causality of God's Goodness.” Laval théologique et philosophique 34.3 (1978): 291–304.Google Scholar

Dodds, Michael J. “Ultimacy and Intimacy: Aquinas on the Relation between God and the World.” In Ordo Sapientiae et Amoris: Hommage au Professeur Jean-Pierre Torrell, O. P. Edited by de Oliveira, Carlos-Josephat Pinto, 211–27. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires, 1993.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Philip J. “Saint Thomas and the Ultimate Purpose of Creation.” Theological Studies 2 (1941): 53–83.Google Scholar

Doolan, Gregory. “Aquinas on Creation: Transitive or Immanent Act?” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak A. Divine Immutability: A Critical Reconsideration. Translated by Robert R. Williams and Claude T. Welch. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1994.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak A. System of Christian Doctrine, vol. 1. Translated by Alfred Cave and J. S. Banks. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1888.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak A. System der christlichen Glaubenslehre, vol. 1, Grundlegung oder Apologetik. Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz, 1879.Google Scholar

Drozdek, Adam. Greek Philosophers as Theologians: The Divine Arche. Burlington: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar

Drury, John L. The Resurrected God: Karl Barth's Trinitarian Theology of Easter. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2014.Google Scholar

Duby, Steven J. Divine Simplicity: A Dogmatic Account. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar

Dümpelmann, Leo. Kreation als ontisch-ontologisches Verhältnis: Zur Metaphysik der Schöpfungstheologie des Thomas von Aquin. München: Verlag Karl Alber, 1969.Google Scholar

Durand, Emmanuel. “Comment pratiquer la théologie trinitaire en pélerin? Béatitude et Trinité selon Richard de Saint-Victor et Thomas d'Aquin.” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 92.2 (2008): 209–23.Google Scholar

Elders, Leo J. The Metaphysics of Being of St. Thomas Aquinas in a Historical Perspective. Leiden: Brill, 1993.Google Scholar

Emery, Gilles. “‘Ad aliquid’: La relation chez Thomas d'Aquin.” In Saint Thomas d'Aquin. Edited by Humbrecht, Theirry-Dominique, 113–35. Paris: Cerf, 2010.Google Scholar

Emery, Gilles. “Essentialism or Personalism in the Treatise on God in St. Thomas Aquinas?” The Thomist 64 (2000): 521–63.Google Scholar

Emery, Gilles. “La Père et l’œuvre trinitaire de creation selon le Commentaire des Sentences de S. Thomas d'Aquin.” In Ordo sapientiae et amoris: Hommage au Professeur Jean-Pierre Torrell OP à l'occasion de son 65e anniversaire. Edited by de Oliveira, Carlos-Josaphat Pinto, 85–117. Fribourg: Editions universitaires, 1993.Google Scholar

Emery, Gilles. “The Personal Mode of Trinitarian Action in St. Thomas Aquinas.” The Thomist 69 (2005): 31–77.Google Scholar

Emery, Gilles. “La relation de création.” Nova et Vetera (French Edition) 88.1 (2013): 9–43.Google Scholar

Emery, Gilles. La Trinité créatrice: Trinité et creation dans les commentaries aux Sentences de Thomas d'Aquin et de ses précurseurs Albert le Grand et Bonaventure. Paris: Vrin, 1995.Google Scholar

Emery, Gilles. The Trinitarian Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Francesca Aran Murphy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Emery, Gilles. “Trinity and Creation.” In The Theology of Thomas Aquinas. Edited by van Nieuwenhove, Rik and Wawrykow, Joseph, 58–76. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Emery, Gilles. Trinity in Aquinas. Ypsilanti: Sapientia Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Emery, Gilles. Trinity, Church, and the Human Person: Thomistic Essays. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. The Science of Knowledge. Edited and translated by Peter Heathand John Lachs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Fischbach, Franck. L'être et l'acte. Enquête sur les fondements de l'ontologie moderne de l'agir. Paris: Vrin, 2002.Google Scholar

Frei, Hans. Types of Christian Theology. Edited by Hunsinger, George and Placher, William. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Friedman, Russell L. Medieval Trinitarian Thought from Aquinas to Ockham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Funkenstein, Amos. Theology and the Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Gersh, Stephen. From Iamblichus to Eriugena: An Investigation of the Prehistory and Evolution of the Pseudo-Dionysian Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 1978.Google Scholar

Gibson, David. Reading the Decree: Exegesis, Election and Christology in Calvin and Barth. London: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar

Gilson, Étienne. Being and Some Philosophers, 2nd edn. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1952.Google Scholar

Gilson, Étienne. Thomism: The Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Laurence K. Shook and Armand Maurer. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2002.Google Scholar

Gockel, Matthias. Barth and Schleiermacher on the Doctrine of Election: A Systematic-Theological Comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Goebel, Hans Theodor. Vom freien Wählen Gottes und des Menschen: Interpretationsübungen zur ‘Analogie’ nach Karl Barths Lehre von der Erwählung und Bedenken ihrer Folgen für die Kirchliche Dogmatik. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1990.Google Scholar

Goetzmann, J. “οὶκονομία.” In New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology and Exegesis. Edited by Brown, Colin, vol. 2, 253–6. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1986.Google Scholar

Gordon, Robert P. “בוֹט.” In New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis. Edited by VanGemeren, Willem A.. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1998.Google Scholar

Goris, Harm. “Theology and Theory of the Word in Aquinas: Understanding Augustine by Innovating Aristotle.” In Aquinas the Augustinian. Edited by Dauphinais, Michael, David, Barry, and Levering, Matthew, 100–44. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Grant, Sara. Toward an Alternative Theology: Confessions of a Non-Dualist Christian. Edited by Malkovsky, Bradley. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Paul J. Intellectual Appetite: A Theological Grammar. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Griswold, Daniel. Triune Eternality: God's Relationship to Time in the Theology of Karl Barth. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2015.Google Scholar

Gunton, Colin. Becoming and Being: The Doctrine of God in Charles Hartshorne and Karl Barth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Hauerwas, Stanley. With the Grain of the Universe: The Church's Witness and Natural Theology. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Häring, Theodor. The Christian Faith: A System of Dogmatics, vol. 1. Translated by John Dickie and George Ferries. New York: Hodder and Stoughton, 1913.Google Scholar

Härle, Wilfried. Outline of Christian Doctrine: An Evangelical Dogmatics. Translated by Ruth Yale. Co-translated and edited by Nicholas Sagovsky. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar

Härle, Wilfried. Sein und Gnade: die Ontologie in Karl Barths kirchlicher Dogmatik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1975.Google Scholar

Hector, Kevin W. “Immutability, Necessity and Triunity: Towards a Resolution of the Trinity and Election Controversy.” Scottish Journal of Theology 65.1 (2012): 64–81.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg W. F. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Edited by Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg W. F. Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline. Part I: Science of Logic. Edited and translated by Klaus Brinkmann and Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg W. F. Philosophy of Mind: Part Three of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830). Translated by William Wallace. Together with the Zusätze in Boumann's Text (1854). Translated by A. V. Miller and revised by Michael J. Inwood. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg W. F. The Science of Logic. Translated by George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Henninger, Mark G. Relations: Medieval Theories 1250–1325. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Herms, Eilert. “Gottes Wirklichkeit.” In Marburger Jahrbuch Theologie I: Vom Handeln Gottes. Edited by Härle, Wilfried and Preul, Reiner, 82–101. Marburg: N. G. Elwert Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar

Holmes, Christopher R. J. The Lord Is Good: Seeking the God of the Psalter. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2018.Google Scholar

Houlgate, Stephen. The Opening of Hegel's Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, George. Disruptive Grace: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, George. How to Read Karl Barth: The Shape of His Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, George. “Karl Barth's Christology: Its Basic Chalcedonian Character.” In The Cambridge Companion to Karl Barth. Edited by Webster, John, 127–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, George. Reading Barth with Charity: A Hermeneutical Proposal. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2015.Google Scholar

Inglis, John. “Emanation in Historical Context: Aquinas and the Dominican Response to the Cathars.” Dionysius 17 (1999): 95–128.Google Scholar

Inwood, Michael. A Hegel Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar

James, William. A Pluralistic Universe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. Alpha and Omega: A Study in the Theology of Karl Barth. Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 2002.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. Knowledge of Things Hoped For: Sense for Theological Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Once More the Logos Asarkos.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 13.2 (2011): 130–3.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. Systematic Theology, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997–9.Google Scholar

Johnson, Keith L. Karl Barth and the Analogia Entis. London: T&T Clark, 2010.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. God's Being Is in Becoming: The Trinitarian Being of God in the Theology of Karl Barth. Translated by John Webster. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “The World as Possibility and Actuality: The Ontology of the Doctrine of Justification.” In Theological Essays, 95–123. Translated by John B. Webster. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1989.Google Scholar

Kerr, Fergus. After Aquinas: Versions of Thomism. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar

Kossel, Clifford G. “Principles of St Thomas’ Distinction between the Esse and Ratio of Relation: Part I.” The Modern Schoolman 24.1 (1946): 19–36.Google Scholar

Kossel, Clifford G. “Principles of St Thomas’ Distinction between the Esse and Ratio of Relation: Part II.” The Modern Schoolman 24.2 (1947): 93–107.Google Scholar

Kossel, Clifford G. “St Thomas's Theory of the Causes of Relation.” The Modern Schoolman 25.3 (1948): 151–72.Google Scholar

Krempel, A. La doctrine de la relation chez Saint Thomas: Exposé historique et systématique. Paris: Vrin, 1952.Google Scholar

Kretzmann, Norman. “A General Problem of Creation: Why Would God Create Anything at All?.” In Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology. Edited by MacDonald, Scott, 208–28. New York: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Kosman, Aryeh. Virtues of Thought: Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Ku, John Baptist. God the Father in the Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York: Peter Lang, 2013.Google Scholar

Lacoste, Jean-Yves. La Phénoménalité de Dieu: Neuf etudes. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2008.Google Scholar

Lacoste, Jean-Yves. “The Appearing and the Irreducible.” Translated by Christina M. Gschwandtner from La Phénoménalité de Dieu, 55–85. In Words of Life: New Theological Turns in French Phenomenology. Edited by Benson, Bruce Ellis and Wirzba, Norman, 42–67. New York: Fordham University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lafont, Ghislain. Structures et méthode dans la “Somme théologique” de saint Thomas d'Aquin. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1996. First published 1961 by Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar

Laporte, Jean-Marc. “Beatitude in the Structure of Aquinas’ Summa: Is Ia26 a Stray Question?.” Toronto Journal of Theology 18.1 (2002): 143–52.Google Scholar

Lee, Sang Eun. Karl Barth und Isaak August Dorner: eine Untersuchung zu Barths Rezeption der Theologie Dorners. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2014.Google Scholar

Levering, Matthew. Paul in the Summa Theologiae. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Levinas, Emmanuel. “God and Philosophy.” In The Postmodern God: A Theological Reader. Edited by Ward, Graham. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar

Lindbeck, George A. The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Lonergan, Bernard. Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas. Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan 2. Edited by Crowe, Frederick E. and Doran, Robert M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Joest, Wilfried. Dogmatik I. Die Wirklichkeit Gottes, 5th edn. Edited by Lüpke, Johannes von. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2010.Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. “Apophatic Theology's Cataphatic Dependencies.” The Thomist 62 (1998): 519–31.Google Scholar

Jones, Joe R. “God: Triune in Essence and Actuality.” Encounter 59.1–2 (1998): 275–91.Google Scholar

Jones, Paul Dafydd. The Humanity of Christ: Christology in Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics. London: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar

Marga, Amy. Karl Barth's Dialogue with Catholicism in Göttingen and Münster: Its Significance for His Doctrine of God. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L. “The Actuality of God: Karl Barth in Conversation with Open Theism.” In Engaging the Doctrine of God: Contemporary Protestant Perspectives. Edited by McCormack, Bruce, 185–242. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2008.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L. “The Doctrine of the Trinity after Barth: An Attempt to Reconstruct Barth's Doctrine in Light of His Later Christology.” In Trinitarian Theology after Barth. Edited by Habets, Myk and Tolliday, Phillip, 87–118. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co, 2012.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L. Karl Barth's Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology: Its Genesis and Development 1909–1936. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L. Orthodox and Modern: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2008.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L., and White, Thomas Joseph, eds. Thomas Aquinas and Karl Barth: An Unofficial Catholic-Protestant Dialogue. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2013.Google Scholar

McKenny, Gerald. The Analogy of Grace: Karl Barth's Moral Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Merriell, D. Juvenal. To the Image of the Trinity: A Study in the Development of Aquinas's Teaching. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1990.Google Scholar

Milbank, John. Beyond Secular Order: The Representation of Being and the Representation of the People. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar

Moreland, Anna Bonta. Known by Nature: Thomas Aquinas on Natural Knowledge of God. New York: Crossroad, 2010.Google Scholar

Morris, Thomas V. “On God and Mann: A View of Divine Simplicity.” Religious Studies 21 (1985): 299–318.Google Scholar

Muller, Earl. “Real Relations and the Divine: Issues in Thomas's Understanding of God's Relation to the World.” Theological Studies 56.4 (1995): 673–95.Google Scholar

Muller, Richard A. Divine Will and Human Choice: Freedom, Contingency, and Necessity in Early Modern Reformed Thought. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2017.Google Scholar

Muller, Richard A. Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics: The Rise and Development of Reformed Orthodoxy, ca. 1520 to ca. 1725, 4 vols. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2003.Google Scholar

Mullins, R. T. The End of the Timeless God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Neder, Adam. Participation in Christ: An Entry into Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2009.Google Scholar

Normore, Calvin G. “The Tradition of Mediaeval Nominalism.” In Studies in Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Wippel, John F., 201–17. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Oakes, Kenneth. Karl Barth on Theology and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

O'Callaghan, John P. “Imago Dei: A Test Case for St. Thomas's Augustinianism.” In Aquinas the Augustinian. Edited by Dauphinais, Michael, David, Barry, and Levering, Matthew, 100–44. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Oliver, Simon. Philosophy, God and Motion. Abingdon: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

O'Rourke, Fran. Pseudo-Dionysius and the Metaphysics of Aquinas. Leiden: Brill, 1992.Google Scholar

Owens, Joseph. An Elementary Christian Metaphysics. Milwaukee: The Bruce Publishing Company, 1963.Google Scholar

Pannenberg, Wolfhart. “Die Subjectivität Gottes und die Trinitätslehre. Ein Beitrag zur Beziehen zwischen Karl Barth und der Philosophie Hegels.” In Grundfragen systematischer Theologie. Gesammelte Aufsätze, vol. 2. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1980.Google Scholar

Pannenberg, Wolfhart. Systematic Theology, vol. 1. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991.Google Scholar

Park, Seung-Chan. Die Rezeption der mittelalterlichen Sprachphilosophie in der Theologie des Thomas von Aquin. Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Analogie. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar

Penner, Sydney. “Suárez on the Reduction of Categorical Relations.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13.2 (2013): 1–24.Google Scholar

Perrier, Emmanuel. La fécondité en Dieu: La puissance notionelle dans la Trinité selon saint Thomas d'Aquin. Paris: Parole et Silence, 2009.Google Scholar

Pickard, Stephen. “Barth on Divine Simplicity: Some Implications for Life in a Complex World.” In Karl Barth: A Future for Postmodern Theology? Edited by Thompson, Geoff and Mostert, Christiaan, 210–23. Adelaide: Australian Theological Forum, 2000.Google Scholar

Pieper, Josef. The Silence of St. Thomas: Three Essays. Translated by John Murray and Daniel O'Connor. South Bend: St. Augustine's Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Pinckaers, Servais. “Le rôle de la fin dans l'action morale selon saint Thomas.” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 45 (1961): 393–421.Google Scholar

Polanus, Amandus. Syntagma theologiae Christianae. Hanoviae, 1615.Google Scholar

Price, Robert. Letters of the Divine Word: The Perfections of God in Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics. London: T&T Clark, 2011.Google Scholar

Pryzwara, Erich. Analogia Entis: Metaphysics: Original Structure and Universal Rhythm. Translated by John R. Betz and David Bentley Hart. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar

Quenstedt, Johannes Andreas. Theologia didactico-polemica. Wittenburg: Quenstedt & Schumacher, 1685.Google Scholar

Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl. Geist in Welt. Munich: Kösel-Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar

Redlon, Reginald A. “St. Thomas and the Freedom of the Creative Act.” Franciscan Studies 20 (1960): 1–18.Google Scholar

Ritschl, Albrecht. Die christliche Lehre von der Rechtfertigung und Versöhnung, vol. 3, Die positiv Entwickelung die Lehre, 3rd edn. Bonn: Adolph Marcus, 1888.Google Scholar

Ritschl, Albrecht. The Christian Doctrine of Justification and Reconciliation: The Positive Development of the Doctrine. Edited by Mackintosh, H. R. and Macaulay, A. B.. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1900.Google Scholar

Rocca, Gregory P. Speaking the Incomprehensible God: Thomas Aquinas on the Interplay of Positive and Negative Theology. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Rogers, Eugene F. Thomas Aquinas and Karl Barth: Sacred Doctrine and the Natural Knowledge of God. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Rosemann, Philipp W. Omne agens agit sibi simile: A “Repetition” of Scholastic Metaphysics. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Rosemann, Philipp W. Omne ens est aliquid: Introduction à la lecture du ‘système’ philosophique de saint Thomas d'Aquin. Louvain-Paris: Éditions Peeters, 1996.Google Scholar

Rosier, Irène. “Signes et sacraments. Thomas d'Aquin et la grammaire spéculative.” Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques 74 (1990): 392–436.Google Scholar

Roy, Louis. “A Note on Barth and Aquinas.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 66.1 (1992): 89–92.Google Scholar

Saner, Andrea D. “Too Much to Grasp”: Exodus 3:13–15 and the Reality of God. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2015.Google Scholar

Schmitz, Kenneth. The Gift: Creation. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Schmitz, Kenneth. The Texture of Being: Essays in First Philosophy. Edited by O'Herron, Paul. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Schoot, Henk J. M. Christ the ‘Name’ of God: Thomas Aquinas on Naming Christ. Leuven: Peeters, 1993.Google Scholar

Schwöbel, Christoph. God: Action and Revelation. Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1992.Google Scholar

Scotus, John Duns. Contingency and Freedom: Lectura I 39. Translated by Antonie Vos Jaczn et al. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1994.Google Scholar

Secada, Jorge. “Suárez on the Ontology of Relations.” In Interpreting Suárez: Critical Essays. Edited by Schwartz, Daniel, 62–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Selner-Wright, Susan C. “Thomas Aquinas on the Acts of Creation and Procreation.” National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 3 (2003): 707–16.Google Scholar

Shields, Daniel. “On Ultimate Ends: Aquinas's Thesis that Loving God Is Better than Knowing Him.” The Thomist 78 (2014): 581–607.Google Scholar

Sokolowski, Robert. The God of Faith and Reason: Foundations of Christian Theology. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982; Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Sokolowski, Robert. Pictures, Quotations, and Distinctions: Fourteen Essays in Phenomenology. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Sonderegger, Katherine. “Barth and the Divine Perfections.” Scottish Journal of Theology 67.4 (2014): 450–63.Google Scholar

Sonderegger, Katherine. “Divine Justice and Justification.” Zeitschrift für dialektisch Theologie, Supplement Series 6 (2014): 164–76.Google Scholar

Sonderegger, Katherine. “On Style in Karl Barth.” Scottish Journal of Theology 45.1 (1992): 65–84.Google Scholar

Sonderegger, Katherine. Systematic Theology, vol. 1, The Doctrine of God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Soulen, R. Kendall. The Divine Name(s) and the Holy Trinity, vol. 1, Distinguishing the Voices. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Štefan, Jan. “Gottes Vollkommenheiten nach KD II/1.” In Karl Barth im europäischen Zeitgeschehen (1935–1950). Edited by Beintker, Michael, Link, Christian, and Trowitzsch, Michael, 83–108. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2010.Google Scholar

Stoltzfus, Philip. Theology as Performance: Music, Aesthetics, and God in Western Thought. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2006.Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco. Disputationes Metaphysicae. In Opera Omnia, vol. 26. Paris: L. Vivès, 1877. Reprinted by Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1965.Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco. On Real Relation (Disputatio Metaphysica XLVII). Translated by John P. Doyle. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Swain, Scott R. “On Divine Naming.” In Aquinas among the Protestants. Edited by Svensson, Manfred and VanDrunen, David, 207–27. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.Google Scholar

Swain, Scott R. The God of the Gospel: Robert Jenson's Trinitarian Theology. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2013.Google Scholar

Sylwanowicz, Michael. Contingent Causality and the Foundation of Duns Scotus’ Metaphysics. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar

Polyander, Johannes, Rivetus, Andreas, Walaeus, Antonius, and Thysius, Antonius. Synopsis Purioris Theologiæ: Synopsis of a Purer Theology – Latin Text and English Translation, vol. 1. Edited by Velde, Dolf te and Ferwerda, Rein. Translated by Riemer A. Faber. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Tanner, Kathryn. God and Creation in Christian Theology: Tyranny or Empowerment? New York: Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Tertullian, . De idololatria: Critical Text, Translation and Commentary. Edited and translated by Waszink, J. H. and van Winden, J. C. M.. Leiden: Brill, 1987.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Gottfried. Christi Person und Werk: Darstellung der evangelisch-lutherischen Dogmatik vom Mittelpunkte der Christologie aus. In Die Voraussetzungen der Christologie und die Person des Mittlers, vol. 1. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Blasing, 1856.Google Scholar

Toit, Andrie du. “Die kirche als doxologische Gemeinschaft im Römerbrief.” In Focusing on Paul: Persuasion and Theological Design in Romans and Galatians. Edited by Breytenbach, Cilliers and du Toit, David S., 297–307. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007.Google Scholar

Tollefsen, Torstein Theodor. Activity and Participation in Late Antique and Early Christian Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Tomarchio, John. “Aquinas's Division of Being According to Modes of Existing.” The Review of Metaphysics 54.3 (2001): 585–613.Google Scholar

Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Christ and Spirituality in St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Bernhard Blankenhorn. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Recherches thomasiennes: Études revues et augmentées. Paris: Vrin, 2000.Google Scholar

Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Saint Thomas Aquinas, vol. 2, Spiritual Master. Translated by Robert Royal. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Tseng, Shao Kai. Karl Barth's Infralapsarian Theology: Origins and Development 1920–1953. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2016.Google Scholar

Turretin, Francis. Insitutio theologicae elencticae, 3 vols. New York: Robert Carter, 1847.Google Scholar

Turretin, Francis. Institutes of Elenctic Theology, 3 vols. Translated by George Musgrave Giger. Edited by Dennison, James T., Jr. Phillipsburg: Presbyterian & Reformed, 1992.Google Scholar

van Driel, Edwin Christian. Incarnation Anyway: Arguments for a Supralapsarian Christology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Vanhoozer, Kevin J. Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Velde, Rudi A. te. Aquinas on God: The ‘Divine Science’ of the Summa Theologiae. Farnham: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar

Velde, Rudi A. te. “God and the Language of Participation.” In Divine Transcendence and Immanence in the Work of Thomas Aquinas. Edited by Goris, Harm, Rikhof, Herwi, and Schoot, Henk, 19–36. Leuven: Peeters, 2009.Google Scholar

Velde, Rudi A. te. Participation and Substantiality in Thomas Aquinas. Leiden: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar

Wallace, Robert M. Hegel's Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Walshe, Sebastian. “Beata Trinitas: The Beatitude of God as Prelude to the Trinitarian Processions.” The Thomist 76 (2012): 189–209.Google Scholar

Watson, Gordon. The Trinity and Creation in Karl Barth. Adelaide: ATF Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Watson, Gordon. “Karl Barth and St. Anselm's Theological Programme.” Scottish Journal of Theology 30.1 (1977): 31–45.Google Scholar

Webster, John B. Barth's Earlier Theology: Four Studies. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar

Webster, John B. Barth's Ethics of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Webster, John B. Barth's Moral Theology: Human Action in Barth's Thought. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Webster, John B. The Domain of the Word: Scripture and Theological Reason. London: T&T Clark, 2012.Google Scholar

Webster, John B. God without Measure, 2 vols. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.Google Scholar

Webster, John B. Holiness. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar

Weigel, Peter. Aquinas on Simplicity: An Investigation into the Foundations of his Philosophical Theology. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2008.Google Scholar

Welker, Michael. “Barth und Hegel: zur Erkenntnis eines methodisches Verfahrens bei Barth.” Evangelishe Theologie 43 (1983): 307–28.Google Scholar

Westerholm, Martin. The Ordering of the Christian Mind: Karl Barth and Theological Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Wilhelmsen, Frederick D. “Creation as a Relation in Saint Thomas Aquinas.” The Modern Schoolman 56 (1979): 107–33.Google Scholar

Williams, A. N. The Architecture of Theology: Structure, System, and Ratio. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Williams, Robert R. Hegel's Ethics of Recognition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Williams, Rowan. “What Does Love Know? St Thomas on the Trinity.” New Blackfriars 82 (2001): 260–71.Google Scholar

Wippel, John F. Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Wippel, John F. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Wittman, Tyler R. “Facticity and Faithfulness: Divine Simplicity in Barth's Christology.” Pro Ecclesia 26.4 (2017): 415–34.Google Scholar

Wittman, Tyler R. “‘Not a God of Confusion but of Peace’: Aquinas and the Meaning of Divine Simplicity.” Modern Theology 32.2 (2016): 151–69.Google Scholar

Wittman, Tyler R. “On the Unity of the Trinity's External Works: Archaeology and Grammar.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 20.3 (2018): 359–80.Google Scholar

Whidden, David L. Christ the Light: The Theology of Light and Illumination in Thomas Aquinas. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Wollebius, Johannes. Compendium theologiae Christianae. London: T. Longman, 1709.Google Scholar

Wood, Donald. “Maker of Heaven and Earth.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 14.4 (2012): 381–95.Google Scholar

Zachhuber, Johannes. Theology as a Science in Nineteenth-Century Germany: From F. C. Baur to Ernst Treoltsch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar