Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes
- Table of Secondary Authorities
- 1 The Study of International and Comparative Employment Law
- 2 The International Labour Organization and International Labor Standards
- 3 The United States
- 4 Canada
- 5 Mexico
- 6 The Regulatory Approach of the North American Free Trade Agreement
- 7 The European Union
- 8 The United Kingdom
- 9 Germany
- 10 France
- 11 China
- 12 Japan
- 13 India
- 14 Pursuing International Labor Standards in U.S. Courts and Through Global Codes of Conduct
- Index
3 - The United States
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes
- Table of Secondary Authorities
- 1 The Study of International and Comparative Employment Law
- 2 The International Labour Organization and International Labor Standards
- 3 The United States
- 4 Canada
- 5 Mexico
- 6 The Regulatory Approach of the North American Free Trade Agreement
- 7 The European Union
- 8 The United Kingdom
- 9 Germany
- 10 France
- 11 China
- 12 Japan
- 13 India
- 14 Pursuing International Labor Standards in U.S. Courts and Through Global Codes of Conduct
- Index
Summary
At the end of the twentieth century, the body of the law of employment in the United States has evolved to a scarcely rational patchwork. It is comprehensible as a whole, if at all, only when viewed through the lens of its history.
Patrick Hardin in I International Labor and Employment Laws, 23-2 (William L. Keller ed. BNA Books 1997).INTRODUCTION
As Professor Hardin suggests in the quote above, the labor and employment law of the United States is not a cohesive set of laws. Instead, it has developed over time with different underlying principles prompting the development of the law at different times. Broadly, the periods of U.S. law may be divided into the organized labor/collective bargaining period from the 1930s to the early 1960s, and the individual employment rights period from the early 1960s to the present. The one prominent exception to these divisions is the Fair Labor Standards Act, an individual employment rights law (imposing a minimum wage and overtime pay and restricting child labor) enacted in 1938. Although the FLSA was not based on the organized labor/collective bargaining model, it was viewed as supporting the collective bargaining model, and the legislation was supported by organized labor.
In the 1930s, the paradigm of organized labor and collective bargaining and collective action prompted Congress to pass the Wagner Act (or National Labor Relations Act), which protected the rights of employees to join unions and engage in collective bargaining with their employers.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Global WorkplaceInternational and Comparative Employment Law - Cases and Materials, pp. 92 - 156Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007