Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:06:39.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Linguistic Colloquialisation, Democratisation and Gender in Asian Englishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2020

By
Lucía Loureiro-Porto
Edited by
Tobias Bernaisch
Tobias Bernaisch
Affiliation:
Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Germany
Get access

Summary

Linguistic colloquialisation and democratisation are said to be responsible for some of the recent changes in inner-circle varieties of English. Thus, colloquialisation is said to be the process that explains changes such as an increase in the use of the future marker be going to, an increase in the frequency of not negation to the detriment of no negation, and an increase in the use of contractions, among others. Democratisation is claimed to be at the root of an increasing use of non-sexist language, including the use of neutral professional terms (e.g. fire-fighter instead of fireman), the use of gender-neutral or inclusive third-person singular pronouns (singular they, or coordinate he or she, rather than generic he), a decline in the use of deontic modal must and a parallel increase of the semi-modals have to and need to. This paper explores these six markers in two Asian Englishes spoken in India and Hong Kong from a genderlectal perspective using ICE-India and ICE-Hong Kong. The results show that (i) colloquialisation and democratisation are global tendencies; (ii) that Hong Kong English is closer to Inner-Circle varieties of English than Indian English regarding these two phenomena; and (iii) that Indian women are clear leaders of the six changes related to colloquialisation and democratisation.

Keywords

Indian EnglishHong Kong Englishcolloquialisationdemocratisationlogistic regressionfemale leadWorld Englishesgendercorpus linguisticsmultifactorial statistics
Type
Chapter
Information
Gender in World Englishes , pp. 176 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, Paul. 2010. ‘Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr? A corpus-based comparison of gendered terms across four diachronic corpora of British English’, Gender and Language 4(1): 125–49.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2017. American and British English: Divided by a Common Language? Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balhorn, Mark. 2009. ‘The epicene pronoun in contemporary newspaper prose’, American Speech 84(4): 391–413.Google Scholar
Berglund, Ylva. 2000. ‘Gonna and going to in the spoken component of the British National Corpus’. In Mair, Christian and Hundt, Marianne, eds. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 35–49.Google Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias and Koch, Christopher. 2016. ‘Attitudes towards Englishes in India’, World Englishes 35(1): 118–32.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward. 1989. ‘Drift and the evolution of English style: a history of three genres’, Language 65: 487–517.Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley and Kwok, Helen. 1990. ‘The dynamics of the Hong Kong accent: social identity and sociolinguistic description’, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 1: 147–72.Google Scholar
Bruckmaier, Elisabeth. 2017. Getting at get in World Englishes. A Corpus-Based Semasiological-Syntactic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006. ‘Social stereotypes, personality traits and regional perception displaced: attitudes towards the ‘new’ quotatives in the U.K’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 10: 362–81.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1982. ‘Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature’. In Tannen, Deborah, ed. Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 35–53.Google Scholar
CIA. 2019a. ‘India’ (website). Retrieved from www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html.Google Scholar
CIA. 2019b. ‘Hong Kong’ (website). Retrieved from www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/hk.html.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2005. ‘The modals and quasi-modals of obligation and necessity in Australian English and other Englishes’, English World-Wide 26(3): 249–73.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2009. ‘Modals and quasi-modals in world Englishes’, World Englishes 28: 281–92.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2013. ‘Grammatical colloquialism and the English quasi-modals: a comparative study’. In Marín-Arrese, Juana I., Carretero, Marta, Hita, Jorge Arús and van der Auwera, Johan, eds. English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: de Gruyter, 155–69.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter and Yao, Xinyue. 2013. ‘Colloquial features in World Englishes’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4): 479–505.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter and Yao, Xinyue. 2018. ‘Colloquialisation and the evolution of Australian English: a cross-varietal and cross-generic study of Australian, British and American English from 1931 to 2006’, English World-Wide 39(3): 253–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curzan, Anne. 2003. Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2015. ‘At the crossroads of change: possession, periphrasis, and prescriptivism in Victoria English’. In Collins, Peter, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 43–63.Google Scholar
Davydova, Julia. 2015. ‘Linguistic change in a multilingual setting: a case study of quotatives in Indian English’. In Collins, Peter, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 297–334.Google Scholar
De Kadt, Elizabeth. 2002. ‘Gender and usage patterns of English in South African urban and rural contexts’, World Englishes 21(1): 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Farrelly, Michael and Seoane, Elena. 2012. ‘Democratisation’. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth C., eds. The Oxford Handbook the History of English. Oxford University Press, 392–401.Google Scholar
Field, Andy. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Hackert, Stephanie and Deuber, Dagmar. 2015. ‘American influence on written Caribbean English: a diachronic analysis of newspaper reportage in the Bahamas and in Trinidad and Tobago’. In Collins, Peter, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 389–410.Google Scholar
Hansen, Beke. 2017. ‘The ICE metadata and the study of Hong Kong English’, World Englishes 36(3): 471–86.Google Scholar
Hansen, Beke. 2018. A Study of Variation and Change in the Modal Systems of World Englishes. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hansen Edwards, Jette G. 2019. The Politics of English in Hong Kong: Attitudes, Identity and Use. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Sigley, Robert and Terraschke, Agnes. 2009. ‘From chairman to chairwoman to chairperson: exploring the move from sexist usages to gender neutrality’. In Peters, Pam, Collins, Peter and Smith, Adam, eds. Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 183–204.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne and Mair, Christian. 1999. ‘“Agile” and “uptight” genres: the corpus-based approach to language change in progress’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. ‘The social motivation of a sound change’, Word 19(3): 273–309.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1982. ‘Building on empirical foundations’. In Lehmann, Winfred P. and Malkiel, Yakov, eds. Perspectives on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–92.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1990. ‘The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change’, Language Variation and Change 2: 205–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Claudia. 2009. ‘“Where’s the party, yaar!”: discourse particles in Indian English’. In Hoffmann, Thomas and Siebers, Lucia, eds. World Englishes – Problems, Properties and Prospects. Selected Papers from the 13th IAWE Conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 207–25.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2011. ‘The modals ARE declining’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(4): 547–64.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian and Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2019. ‘Grammaticalization of semi-modals of necessity in Asian Englishes’, English World-Wide 40(2): 115–42.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 1997a. ‘The spread of the going-to-future in written English: a corpus-based investigation into language change in progress’. In Hickey, Raymond and Puppel, Stanislav, eds. Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1537–43.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 1997b. ‘Parallel corpora: a real-time approach to the study of language change in progress’. In Ljung, Magnus, ed. Corpus-Based Studies in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 195–209.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation, and Standardization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2015. ‘Cross-variety diachronic drifts and ephemeral regional contrasts: an analysis of modality in the extended Brown family of corpora and what it can tell us about the New Englishes’. In Collins, Peter, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 119–46.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2009. ‘Deracialising the GOOSE vowel in South African English: accelerated linguistic change amongst young, middle-class, females in post-apartheid South Africa’. In Hoffmann, Thomas and Siebers, Lucia, eds. World Englishes – Problems, Properties and Prospects. Selected Papers from the 13th IAWE Conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–18.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2007. ‘Steady states in the evolution of New Englishes: present-day Indian English as an equilibrium’, Journal of English Linguistics 35(2): 157–87.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato and Schilk, Marco. 2012. ‘Exploring variation and change in New Englishes: looking into the International Corpus of English (ICE) and beyond’. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Traugott, C., eds. The Oxford Handbook the History of English. Oxford University Press, 189–99.Google Scholar
Myhill, John. 1995. ‘Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals’, Linguistics 33(2): 157–211.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth C. (eds.) (2012). The Oxford Handbook the History of English. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, Ramoulin-Brunberg, Helena and Mannila, Heikki. 2011. ‘The diffusion of language change in real time: progressive and conservative individuals and the time depth of change’, Language Variation and Change 23: 1–43.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. 1999. ‘Male and female styles in 17th century correspondence: I THINK’, Language Variation and Change, 11: 123–41.Google Scholar
Peters, Pam. 2008. ‘Patterns of negation: the relationship between NO and NOT in regional varieties of English’. In Nevalainen, Terttu, Taavitsainen, Irma, Pahta, Päivi and Korhonen, Minna, eds. The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 47–62.Google Scholar
Rydstrøm, Helle. 2010. ‘Introduction: gendered inequalities in Asia: configuring, contesting and recognizing women and men’. In Rydstrøm, Helle, ed. Gender Inequalities in Asia: Configuring, Contesting and Recognizing Women and Men. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties of English around the World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ullrich, Helen E. 1992. ‘Sociolinguistic change in language attitudes: a Karnataka village study’. In Dimock, Edward C., Kachru, Braj B. and Krishnamurti, Bh., eds. Dimensions of Sociolinguistics in South Asia. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, 113–27.Google Scholar
Valentine, Tamara. 1995. ‘Agreeing and disagreeing in Indian English discourse: implications for language teaching’. In Tickoo, Makhan L., ed. Issues and Attitudes: An Anthology of Invited Papers. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, 227–50.Google Scholar
Valentine, Tamara. 2001. ‘Reconstructing identifies and gender in discourse: English transplanted’, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 31(1): 193–212.Google Scholar
Valentine, Tamara. 2009. ‘World Englishes and gender identities’. In Braj B. Kachru, Yamuna Kachru and Cecil. Nelson, L., eds. The Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: Blackwell, 567–80.Google Scholar
Wagner, Susanne. 2018. ‘“The chairperson said she believes that the worst days are over” – why gender-neutral terms are not gender-neutral in outer circle varieties’ (Paper presented at ICAME 39, 30 May–3 June 2018, Tampere, Finland).Google Scholar
Wasserman, Ronel and van Rooy, Bertus. 2014. ‘The development of modals of obligation and necessity in White South African English through contact with Afrikaans’, Journal of English Linguistics 42(1): 31–50.Google Scholar
Xiao, Richard. 2009. ‘Multidimensional analysis and the study of World Englishes’, World Englishes 28(4): 421–50.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×