Book contents
- Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right and its Relation to Kant
- Chapter 2 Fichte’s Separation of Right from Morality
- Chapter 3 Fichte’s Independence Thesis
- Chapter 4 Deduction of the Summons and the Existence of Other Rational Beings
- Chapter 5 Fichte’s Kabbalistic Realism: Summons as ẓimẓum
- Chapter 6 Fichte’s Developmental View of Self-Consciousness
- Chapter 7 The Body as Site of Action and Intersubjectivity in Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right
- Chapter 8 Fichte’s Transcendental Deduction of Private Property
- Chapter 9 Fichte on Personal Freedom and the Freedom of Others
- Chapter 10 Freedom, Coercion, and the Relation of Right
- Chapter 11 Fichte’s Organic Unification: Recognition and the Self-overcoming of Social Contract Theory
- Chapter 12 Fichte and Human Rights
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right and its Relation to Kant
- Chapter 2 Fichte’s Separation of Right from Morality
- Chapter 3 Fichte’s Independence Thesis
- Chapter 4 Deduction of the Summons and the Existence of Other Rational Beings
- Chapter 5 Fichte’s Kabbalistic Realism: Summons as ẓimẓum
- Chapter 6 Fichte’s Developmental View of Self-Consciousness
- Chapter 7 The Body as Site of Action and Intersubjectivity in Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right
- Chapter 8 Fichte’s Transcendental Deduction of Private Property
- Chapter 9 Fichte on Personal Freedom and the Freedom of Others
- Chapter 10 Freedom, Coercion, and the Relation of Right
- Chapter 11 Fichte’s Organic Unification: Recognition and the Self-overcoming of Social Contract Theory
- Chapter 12 Fichte and Human Rights
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fichte's Foundations of Natural RightA Critical Guide, pp. 259 - 268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Aboab, Issac (trans.) (1655). Sefer Sha’ar ha-shamayim (Hebrew translation of Cohen de Herrera, Puerto del Cielo) (Amsterdam: Emanuel Benveniste).Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert (2002). The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism, trans. Paulson, Bonnie L. and Paulson, Stanley L. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1981). On the Soul, trans. Apostle, Hippocrates G. (Grinell: Peripatetic Press).Google Scholar
Baier, Annette (1985). Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
Baum, Manfred (2013). “Freiheit und Recht bei Kant,” in Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, Rocca, Claudio La, and Ruffing, Margit (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des XI. Kant-Kongresses 2010 (Berlin: DeGruyter).Google Scholar
Baur, Michael (2006). “Fichte’s Impossible Contract,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Rights, Bodies and Recognition: New Essays on Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right (Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare (1995). Of Crimes and Punishments and Other Writings, ed. Bellamy, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (1987). The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (2002). German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism 1781–1801 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
ben Israel, Menasseh (1651). Nishmat Ḥayyim (Amsterdam: Samuel ben Israel Abrabanel Sueiro).Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy (1973). “A Critical Examination of the Declaration of Rights,” in Parekh, Bhikhu (ed.), Bentham’s Political Thought (London: Croom Helm).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (1998). “Two Concepts of Liberty,” in The Proper Study of Mankind (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux).Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. M. (2007). “Recognition and Embodiment,” in Hammer, Espen (ed.), German Idealism: Contemporary Perspectives (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. M. (2010). “Recognition and Embodiment: Fichte’s Materialism,” in Schmidt am Busch, Hans-Christoph and Zurn, Christopher F. (eds.), The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books).Google Scholar
Beyleveld, Deryck and Brownsword, Roger (1986). Law as a Moral Judgment (London: Sweet and Maxwell).Google Scholar
Bloch, Ernst (1987). Natural Law and Human Dignity, trans. Schmidt, Dennis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel (1999). “Ficthe’s Abstract Realism,” in Baur, Michael and Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (eds.), The Emergence of German Idealism (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel (2002). “Fichte’s Philosophical Fictions,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), New Essays on Fichte’s Later Jena Wissenschaftslehre (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel (2008). “The First-Person Standpoint of Fichte’s Ethics,” Philosophy Today 52(3–4): 270–81.Google Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel (2013a). “Circles and Grounds,” in Thinking through the Wissenschaftslehre: Themes from Fichte’s Early Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel (2013b). “The Spirit of the Early Wissenschaftslehre,” in Thinking through the Wissenschaftslehre: Themes from Fichte’s Early Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel (2013c). “The Divided Self and the Tasks of Philosophy,” in Thinking through the Wissenschaftslehre: Themes from Fichte’s Early Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel (2013d). “Jumping the Transcendental Shark: Fichte’s ‘Argument of Belief’ in Book III of Die Bestimmung des Menschen and the Transition from the Earlier to the Later Wissenschaftslehre,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Fichte’s Vocation of Man: New Interpretive and Critical Essays (Albany: State University of New York Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel (2014). “Johann Gottlieb Fichte,” Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/johann-fichte/.Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor (1999). “The Body in Husserl and Merleau-Ponty,” Philosophical Topics 27(2): 205–26.Google Scholar
Clarke, James Alexander (2009). “Fichte and Hegel on Recognition,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17(2): 365–85.Google Scholar
Clarke, James Alexander (2011). “Hegel’s Critique of Fichte in the 1802/03 Essay on Natural Right,” Inquiry 54(3): 207–25.Google Scholar
Clarke, James Alexander (2014). “Fichte’s Transcendental Justification of Human Rights,” in Rockmore, Tom and Breazeale, Daniel (eds.) Fichte and Transcendental Philosophy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Costello, Peter (2013). Layers in Husserl’s Phenomenology: On Meaning and Intersubjectivity (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel. (2013). “The Self before Self-Consciousness: Hegel’s Developmental Account,” Hegel Bulletin 34(2): 135–58.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2005). “Fichte and the Second-Person Standpoint,” in Ameriks, Karl and Stolzenberg, Jürgen (eds.), Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/ International Yearbook of German Idealism. Vol. 3 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
De Pascale, Carla (1995). Etica e diritto. La filosofia pratica di Fichte e le sue ascendenze kantiane (Bologna: Il Mulino).Google Scholar
De Pascale, Carla (2001). “Das Völkerrecht (Zweiter Anhang),” in Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin: Akademie).Google Scholar
Druet, Pierre-Philippe (1975). “La conversion de Fichte à la politique kantienne,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 80(1): 54–84.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus (2000). Outlines of Scepticism, eds. Annas, Julia and Barnes, Jonathan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Erhard, Johann Benjamin (1970). “Apologie des Teufels,” in Haasis, Hellmut G. (ed.), Über das Recht des Volkes zu einer Revolution und andere Schriften. (Munich: C. Hanser).Google Scholar
Erhard, Johann Benjamin (1970). Über das Recht des Volks zu einer Revolution, in Hellmut G. Haasis (ed.), Über das Recht des Volks zu einer Revolutionund andere Schriften (Munich: C. Hanser).Google Scholar
Estes, Yolanda (2006). “Fichte’s Hypothetical Imperative: Morality, Right, and Philosophy in the Jena Wissenschaftslehre,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Rights, Bodies and Recognition: New Essays on Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right (Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Fano, Menahem Azariah de (1648). Yonat Elem (Amsterdam: Judah ben Mordecai and Samuel ben Moses ha-Levi).Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc (1987). “The Distinction between Law and Ethics in the Early Philosophy of Fichte,” Philosophical Forum 19(2–3): 182–96.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Paul Johann Anselm (1796). Kritik des natürlichen Rechts als Propädeutik zu einer Wissenschaft der natürlichen Rechte. Altona, Hamburg: Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1869). The Science of Rights, trans. Kroeger, A. E. (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott).Google Scholar
Franks, Paul (2005). All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German idealism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Franks, Paul (2008). “Ancient Skepticism, Modern Naturalism, and Nihilism in Hegel’s Early Jena Writings,” in Beiser, Frederick (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth Century Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Franks, Paul (Forthcoming a). “Fichte’s Position” in Zöller, Günther (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Fichte (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Franks, Paul (Forthcoming b). “Nothing Comes from Nothing: Judaism, the Orient, and Kabbalah in Hegel’s Reception of Spinoza,” inDella Rocca, Michael (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Freedman, Harry and Simon, Maurice (eds.) (1977). The Midrash Rabbah. 5 vols. (London: Soncino).Google Scholar
Füβer, Klaus (1999). “Farewell to ‘Legal Positivism’: The Separation Thesis Unravelling,” in George, Robert P. (ed.), The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans G. (1989). Truth and Method, trans. Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G. (New York: Continuum).Google Scholar
Gewirth, Alan (1982). Human Rights. Essays on Justification and Applications (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Gabriel (2015). “Fichte’s Deduction of the External World,” International Philosophical Quarterly 55(2): 217–34.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A. (1958). “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” Harvard Law Review 71(4): 593–629.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A. (1982). Essays on Bentham: Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Haugeland, John (1998a). “Mind Embodied and Embedded,” in Having Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John (1998b). “Truth and Rule-following,” in Having Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1999). “On the Scientific Ways of Treating Natural Law,” in Dickey, Lawrence and Nisbet, H. B. (eds.), Political Writings (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1966). “Fichtes ursprüngliche Einsicht,” in Henrich, Dieter and Wagner, Hans (eds.), Subjektivität und Metaphysik: Festschrift für Wolfgang Cramer (Frankfurt: Klostermann).Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1982). “Fichte’s Original Insight,” in Christensen, D. E. (ed.) and Lachterman, David (trans.), Contemporary German Philosophy. Vol. 1 (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press).Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (2009). “The Paradoxical Self-Relatedness of Consciousness,” in Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1996). Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1997). On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb (2001). Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning (Dartmouth: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. (1996). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (2001). “Die transzendentale Notwendigkeit von Intersubjektivität (Zweiter Lehersatz: §3)”, in Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin: Akademie).Google Scholar
Horstmann, Rolf-Peter (2001). “Die Theorie des Urrechts (§§8–12),” in Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin: Akademie).Google Scholar
Hufeland, Gottlieb (1785). Versuch über den Grundsatz des Naturrechts (Leipzig: Göschen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hufeland, Gottlieb (1790). Lehrsätze des Naturrechts und der damit verbundenen Wissenschaften (Jena: Christian Heinrich Cuno’s Erben).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund (1982). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Psychology: First Book, trans. Kersten, Fred (Boston: Kluwer).Google Scholar
Idel, Moshe (1992). “On the Development of the Concept of ẓimẓum in Kabbalah and its Research,” (Hebrew), Jerusalem Studies in Jewish Thought 10: 310–52.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich (1994a). “Concerning the Doctrine of Spinoza in Letters to Herr Moses Mendelssohn,” in di Giovanni, George (ed. and trans.), Main Philosophical Writings (Kingston, ON and Montreal, QC: McGill-Queens University Press).Google Scholar
Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich (1994b). “David Hume on Faith, or Idealism and Realism, A Dialogue,” in di Giovanni, George (ed. and trans.), Main Philosophical Writings (Kingston, ON and Montreal, QC: McGill-Queens University Press).Google Scholar
Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich (1994c). “Edward Allwill’s Collection of Letters,” in di Giovanni, George (ed. and trans.), Main Philosophical Writings (Kingston, ON and Montreal, QC: McGill-Queens University Press).Google Scholar
James, David (2010). “Fichte’s Theory of Property,” European Journal of Political Theory 9(2): 202–17.Google Scholar
James, David (2011). Fichte’s Social and Political Philosophy: Property and Virtue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
James, David (2015). Fichte’s Republic: Idealism, History and Nationalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996). “On the Common Saying: That May be Correct in Theory, But it is of No Use in Practice,” in Gregor, Mary (ed. and trans.), Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kersting, Wolfgang (2001). “Die Unäbhangigkeit des Rechts von der Moral (Einleitung),” in Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar
Knorr von Rosenroth, Christian et al. (1677–84). Kabbala Denudata seu doctrina Hebraeorum transcendentalis et metaphysica atque theological (Sulzbach: Abraham Lichtentahler).Google Scholar
Kohn, Hans (1949). “The Paradox of Fichte’s Nationalism,” Journal of the History of Ideas 10(3): 319–43.Google Scholar
Kosch, Michelle (2013). “Formal Freedom in Fichte’s System of Ethics,” International Yearbook of German Idealism 9: 150–68.Google Scholar
Laudou, Christophe (2008). “Fichte, entre volonté générale et Volkgeist,” in Goddard, Jean-Christophe and de Rosales, Jacinto Rivera (eds.), Fichte et la politique (Monza: Polimetrica).Google Scholar
Levinson, Jerrold (2002). “Gewirth on Absolute Rights,” in Smith, G. W. (ed.), Critical Concepts in Political Theory (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Locke, John (1988). The Second Treatise on Government, ed. Laslett, Peter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Maimon, Salomon (1970). “Über die ersten Gründe des Naturrechts,” in Valerio Verra (ed.), Gesammelte Werke, VI, (Hildesheim: Olms).Google Scholar
Martin, Wayne (1997). “Pipe-dreams and Nonthoughts: The Problems with Things in Themselves,” in Idealism and Objectivity: Understanding Fichte’s Jena Project (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Martin, Wayne (2006). “Is Fichte a Social Contract Theorist?” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Rights, Bodies and Recognition: New Essays on Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right (Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Martin, Wayne (2015). “Fichtes transzendentale Phänomenologie des Tätigkeit,” in Merle, Jean-Christophe and Schmidt, Andreas (eds.), Fichte’s System der Sittenlehre: Ein kooperativer Kommentar (Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann).Google Scholar
Maus, Ingeborg (2001). “Die Verfassung und ihre Garantie: das Ephorat (§§16, 17, und 21),” in Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin: Akademie).Google Scholar
Merle, Jean-Christophe (2001). “Eigentumsrecht (§§18–19),” in Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin: Akademie).Google Scholar
Merle, Jean-Christophe (2009). German Idealism and the Concept of Punishment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (2012). Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Landes, Donald A. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Merrill, Bruce (2006). “Fichte’s Materialism,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Rights, Bodies and Recognition: New Essays on Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right (Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas (1970). The Possibility of Altruism (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Nance, Michael (2015). “Recognition, Freedom, and the Self in Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right,” European Journal of Philosophy 23(3): 608–32.Google Scholar
Nance, Michael (n.d.) “Anarchy, Legitimacy, and Economic Planning in Fichte’s Jena Political Philosophy” (unpublished ms).Google Scholar
Nease, Lon (2002). “The Severity of the Moral Law in Fichte’s Science of Ethics,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), New Essays on Fichte’s Later Jena Wissenschaftslehre (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (1990). Fichte’s Theory of Subjectivity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (1994). “Fichte and the Relationship between Right and Morality,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Fichte: Historical Contexts/Contemporary Controversies (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press).Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (2001). “The Efficacy of the Rational Being,” in Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (2013). “Rousseau’s Critique of Economic Inequality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 41(3): 193–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, Angelica (2006). “The Role of the Human Body in Fichte’s Grundlage des Naturrechts (1796–97),” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Rights, Bodies and Recognition: New Essays on Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right (Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing).Google Scholar
Nuzzo, Angelica (2011). “Théorie de l’éthique et éthique appliquée chez Fichte: Sittenlehre ou Metaphysik der Sitten?” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 3: 319–33.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (2007). “Experts, Practitioners, and Practical Judgment,” Journal of Moral Philosophy 4(1): 154–66.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (1996). “Institutional Design and Rational Choice,” in Goodin, R. (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2012). “Freedom,” in Estlund, David (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Philonenko, Alexis (1980). La Liberté humaine dans la Philosophie de Fichte (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar
Philonenko, Alexis (1988). Théorie et praxis dans la pensée morale et politique de Kant et de Fichte en 1793 (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar
Renaut, Alain (1986). Le système du droit: Philosophie et droit dans la pensée de Fichte (Paris: PUF).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Joachim (ed.) (1971–84). Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vols. 1–6 (Darmstade: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesselschaft).Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, Franz (1979). Briefe und Tagebücher II: 1918–29, ed. Rosenzweig, Rachel and Rosenzweig-Scheinmann, Edith (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1945). A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Russon, John (2007). “The Spatiality of Self-Consciousness: Originary Passivity in Kant, Merleau-Ponty and Derrida,” Chiasmi International 9: 219–32.Google Scholar
Russon, John (2014). “Philosophy of Mind,” in Baur, Michael (ed.), Hegel: Key Concepts (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1798). “Über die Weltseele,” in Schelling, K. F. A. (ed.), Schellings sämtliche Werke, Abtheilung I, Vol. 2 (Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta, 1856–61).Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1980). “New Deduction of Natural Right,” in The Unconditional in Human Knowledge. Four Early Essays (1794–1796), trans. Marti, Fritz (Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press).Google Scholar
Schneerson, Dov Ber (1820). Ner Miẓvah ve-Torah Or (Kopys: Yisrael ben Yitzhak Yafeh).Google Scholar
Schottky, Richard (1995). Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der staatsphilosophischen Vertragstheorie im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert (Hobbes – Locke – Rousseau – Fichte) mit einem Beitrag zum Problem der Gewaltenteilung bei Rousseau und Fichte (Fichte-Studien-Supplementa 6) (Amsterdam: Rodopi).Google Scholar
Scribner, S. (2002). “The ‘Subtle Matter’ of Intersubjectivity in the Grundlage des Naturrechts,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), New Essays on Fichte’s Later Jena Wissenschaftslehre (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig (1979a). Anerkennung als Prinzip der praktischen Philosophie (Freiburg: Karl Alber).Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig (1979b). “Wandlungen in Fichtes Gesellschaftslehre,” Philosophische Rundschau 26: 120–8.Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig (1992). “Einheit und Methode von Fichtes ‘Grundlage des Naturrechts,” in Praktische Philosophie im Deutschen Idealismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (1985). “Ethics,” in The Collected Writings of Spinoza: Volume 1, trans. Curley, Edwin (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Stern, Robert (1993). “Introduction,” in Stern, Robert (ed.), Transcendental Arguments: Problems and Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Tully, James (1980). A Discourse on Property: John Locke and his Adversaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Uleman, Jennifer (2004). “External Freedom in Kant’s Doctrine of Right: Political, Metaphysical,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68: 578–601.Google Scholar
Valabregue-Perry, Sandra (2012). “The Concept of Infinity (Eyn Sof) and the Rise of Theosophical Kabbalah,” Jewish Quarterly Review 102: 405–30.Google Scholar
Varden, Helga (2008). “Kant’s Non-Voluntarist Conception of Political Obligation,” Kantian Review 13: 1–45.Google Scholar
Vater, Michael (2006). “Schelling’s Aphorisms on Natural Right: A Comparison with Fichte’s Grundlage des Naturrechts,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Rights, Bodies and Recognition: New Essays on Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right (Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Verweyen, Hansjürgen (1975). Recht und Sittlichkeit in J. G. Fichtes Gesellschaftslehre (Freiburg: Alber).Google Scholar
Vital, Ḥaim (1999). The Tree of Life: The Palace of Adam Kadmon, Wilder Menzi, Donald and Padeh, Zwe (trans.) (Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson).Google Scholar
Wachter, Johann Georg (1699). Der Spinozismus im Jüdenthumb (Amsterdam: Johann Wolters).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy (2002). God, Locke and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke’s Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wenar, Leif (2010). “Rights,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall/2010/entries/rights.Google Scholar
Williams, Robert (1992). Recognition: Fichte and Hegel on the Other (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Williams, Robert (2002). “The Displacement of Recognition by Coercion in Fichte’s Grundlage des Naturrechts,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), New Essays on Fichte’s Later Jena Wissenschaftslehre (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, Robert (2006). “Recognition, Right, and Social Contract,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Rights, Bodies and Recognition: New Essays on Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right (Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary (1995). A Vindication of the Rights of Men and A Vindication of the Rights of Women and Hints, ed. Tomaselli, Sylvana (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1991). “Fichte’s Philosophical Revolution,” Philosophical Topics 19(2): 1–28.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2011). “Fichte’s Absolute Freedom,” International Yearbook of German Idealism 9: 100–29.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2014). “Fichte’s Absolute Freedom,” reprint (with minor revisions) of the 2011 paper as Chapter 7 in The Free Development of Each: Studies on Freedom, Right and Ethics in Classical German Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (Forthcoming). “Fichte’s Philosophy of Right and Ethics,” in Zöller, Günter (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Fichte (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Zöller, Günter (1998). Fichte’s Transcendental Idealism: The Original Duplicity of Intelligence and Will (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar