Lutjen, P, Trouson, A, Leeton, J, et al. The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilization and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failure. Nature 1984; 307: 174–75.Google Scholar

Glennon, T. UK and US perspectives on the regulation of gamete donation. In Richards, M, Pennings, G, Appleby, JB, eds. Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012; 90–111.Google Scholar

Haase, JM, Blyth, E. Global perspectives in infertility counseling. In Covington, SN, Burns, LH, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006; 544–57.Google Scholar

American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 47–62.Google Scholar

Boivin, J, Kentenich, H, eds. ESHRE Monograph: Guidelines for Counseling in Infertility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Garcia-Ruiz, Y, Guerra-Diaz, D. Gamete and embryo donation: a legal view from Spain. In Richards, M, Pennings, G, Appleby, JB, eds. Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012; 112–29.Google Scholar

Hershberger, P. Recipients of oocyte donation: an integrative review. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2004; 33: 610–21.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, ML, Smith, JF, Millstein, SG, et al. Perceived negative consequences of donor gametes from male and female members of infertile couples. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 921–6.Google Scholar

Lindeim, SR, Kavi, S, Sauer, M. Understanding differences in the perception of anonymous parties: a comparison between gamete donors and their recipients. J Assist Reprod Genetics 2000; 17: 127–30.Google Scholar

Tarlatzis, BC, Pakos, G. Oocyte donation: Clinical and practical aspects. Moll Cell Endocrinol 2000; 161: 99–102.Google Scholar

Greil, A, Slauson-Blevins, K, McQuillan, J. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Health Illn 2010; 32: 140–62.Google Scholar

Sachs, PL, Burns, LH. Recipient counseling for oocyte donation. In Covington, SN, Burns, LH, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006; 319–38.Google Scholar

Burns, LH, Greenfeld, DA. CPHI: Comprehensive psychosocial history for infertility. In Covington, SN, Burns, LH, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006; 563–64.Google Scholar

Covington, SN. Group approaches to infertility counseling. In Covington, SN, Burns, LH, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006; 157–68.Google Scholar

Thorn, P, Daniels, KR. A group-work approach in family building by donor insemination: empowering the marginalized. Hum Fert 2003; 6: 46–50.Google Scholar

Pennings, G, Gurtin, ZB. The legal and ethical regulation of transnational donation. In Richards, M, Pennings, G, Appleby, JB, eds. Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006; 130–49.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, K, Johnson, L, Bourne, K, et al. Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response. Hum Reprod 2013 Dec 6. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar

Bratt, S, Sacrannie, RR, Thomas, GE, et al. Can we improve recruitment of oocyte donors with loss of donor anonymity? A hospital-based survey. Hum Fertil 2008; 11: 101–7.Google Scholar

Cholst, I. Oocyte donation and the therapeutic misconception. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 1561–2.Google Scholar

Applegarth, LD, Kingsberg, SA. The donor as patient: assessment and support. In: Covington, SN, Burns, LH, Eds. Infertility Counseling: A Handbook for Clinicians, 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006; 339–55.Google Scholar

Almeling, R. Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2011.Google Scholar

The Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 37–43.Google Scholar

Ory, SJ, Ed. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance (IFFS) 2013. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.iffs-reproduction.org/resource/resmgr/iffs_surveillance_09-19-13.pdf. (Accessed May 25, 2014.)Google Scholar

Donors: donating for treatment and research [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.hfea.gov.uk.Google Scholar

Fertility Society of Australia: Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee. Code of practice for assisted reproductive technology [Online]. 2010 October. Available from: URL: http://www.fertilitysociety.com.au/rtac.Google Scholar

Assisted human reproduction act [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/index-eng.php.Google Scholar

A review of the HFEA's sperm and egg donation policies – 2011 [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/donationreview.Google Scholar

Del Valle, A, Bradley, L, Said, T. Anonymous semen donor recruitment without reimbursement in Canada. Repro BioMedicine 2008; 17: 15–20.Google Scholar

Ekerhovd, E, Faurskov, A, Werner, C. Swedish sperm donors are driven by altruism, but shortage of sperm donors leads to reproductive traveling. Ups J Med Sci 2008; 113: 305–13.Google Scholar

Ernst, E, Ingerslev, HJ, Schou, O, Stoltenberg, M. Attitudes among sperm donors in 1992 and 2002: a Danish questionnaire survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 327–33.Google Scholar

Van den Broeck, U, Vandermeeren, M, Vanderschueren, D, Enzlin, P, Demyttenaere, K, D'Hooghe, T. A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 0: 1–15.Google Scholar

Daniels, K. Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part I: semen donors. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2007; 10: 151–8.Google Scholar

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology: Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 47–62.Google Scholar

Guidelines for counseling in infertility [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.eshre.eu.Google Scholar

ESHRE: Task Force on Ethics and Law. Gamete and embryo donation. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1407–8.Google Scholar

Skillern, A, Cedars, M, Huddleston, H. Egg donor informed consent tool (EDICT): development and validation of a new informed consent tool for oocyte donors. Fert Steril 2013; 99: 1733–8.Google Scholar

Distant, Daniel, Christian Post Reporter: Sperm Bank Mix-Up in Utah: Convicted Felon Fathered 21-Year- Old Girl, Possibly Hundreds of Others. www.christianpost.com/news/sperm-bank-mixup-in-utah-convicted-felon-fathered-21-year-old-girl-possibly-hundreds-of-others-113219. January 23, 2014.Google Scholar

California cryobank [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.californiacryobank.com.Google Scholar

Purewal, S, van den Akker, OBA. Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15: 499–515.Google Scholar

Jadva, V, Freeman, T, Kramer, W, Golombok, S. Sperm and oocyte donors’ experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with donor offspring. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 638–46.Google Scholar

Schover, LR, Rothmann, SA, Colllins, RL. The personality and motivation of semen donors: a comparison with oocyte donors. Hum Reprod 1992; 7: 575–9.Google Scholar

Sydjo, G, Svanberg, AS, Lampic, C, Jablonowska, B. Relationships in IVF couples 20 years after treatment. Hum Reprod 2011; 20: 1952–7.Google Scholar

Godmand, KM, Sanders, K, Rosenberg, M, Burton, P. Potential sperm donors’, recipients and their partners’ opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western Australia. Hum Reprod 2006; 22: 3022–6.Google Scholar

Mahlstadt, PP, Probasco, KA. Sperm donors: their attitudes toward providing medical and psychosocial information for recipient couples and donor offspring. Fertil Steril 1991; 56: 747–53.Google Scholar

Riggs, DW, Russell, L. Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity release legislation. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 266–72.Google Scholar

Hammarburg, K, Carmichael, M, Tinney, L, Mulder, A. Gamete donors’ and recipients’ evaluation of donor counseling: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Aust N Z J Gynaecol 2008; 48: 601–6.Google Scholar

Zweifel, JE, Biaggio, B, Schouweiler, C, Lindheim, SR. Follow-up assessment of excluded oocyte donor candidates. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009; 35: 320–5.Google Scholar

Jordan, CB, Belar, CD, Williams, RS. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors’ experiences. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 25: 145–51.Google Scholar

Winter, A, Daniluk, J. A gift from the heart: the experiences of women whose egg donations helped their sisters become mothers. J Couns Dev 2004; 82: 483–95.Google Scholar

Yee, S, Hitkari, JA, Greenblatt, EM. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons. Human Reprod 2007; 22(7): 2040–50.Google Scholar

Covington, SN, Patrizio, P. Gestational carriers and surrogates. In: Sauer, MV, editor. Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation. 2nd edn. London: Springer Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Gugucheva, M. Surrogacy in America Report. Boston (MA): Council for Responsible Genetics (US); 2010; 1–40.Google Scholar

Crockin, SL. Gestational surrogacy. Legal conceptions, the evolving law and policy of ART. In: Crockin, SL and Jones, HW, editors. Legal Conceptions: The Evolving Land and Policy of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Inhorn, MC, Patrizio, P. Rethinking reproductive “tourism” as reproductive “exile.” Fertil Steril 2009, 92 (3): 904–6.Google Scholar

Inhorn, M, Patrizio, P. The global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: twenty key findings in the new millennium. Curr Opin Obstet Gyn 2012, 24(3): 158–63.Google Scholar

Hinson, D. States-by-State surrogacy law. [Internet] 2013. Available from: http://www.creativefamilyconnections.com/state-map-surroagcy-law-practices. Accessed October 2014.Google Scholar

Haberman, C. Baby M and the Question of Surrogate Motherhood. The New York Times [Internet]. 2014 March 23 [cited March 23]; Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/us/baby-m-and-the-question-of-surrogate motherhood.html?module=Search&mabReward=relbias%3Aw. Accessed October 2014.Google Scholar

Shenfield, F, Pennings, G, Cohen, J. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 10: Surrogacy. Hum Reprod 2005; 10: 2705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Consideration of the gestational carrier: a committee opinion. Fertil Ster 2013; 19: 1838–41.Google Scholar

Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: an ASRM practice committee guideline. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 301–8.Google Scholar

Hanafin, H. Surrogacy and gestational carrier participants. In Covington, SN, Burns, LH, editors. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. 2nd edn. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Franks, D. Psychiatric evaluation of women in a surrogate mother program. Am J Psychiat 1981; 138: 1378–9.Google Scholar

Parker, JP. Motivation of surrogate mothers: initial findings. Am J Psychiat 1983; 140: 117.Google Scholar

Reame, N, Parker, JP. Surrogate parenting: clinical features of forty-four cases. Am J Obstet Gyn 1990; 162: 1220–5.Google Scholar

Mechanick-Braverman, A, Corson, SL. Characteristics of participants in a gestational carrier program. J Assist Repro Gen 1992; 9: 353–7.Google Scholar

Sims, JA, Thomas, KM, Hopwood, CJ, Chen, SH, Pascale, C. Psychometric properties and norms for the Personality Assessment Inventory in egg donors and gestational carriers. J Pers Assess 2013; 95(5): 495–9.Google Scholar

Simpson, TS, Bogedan, TR, Mindes, E, Toll, C, Richter, K, Covington, SN. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI-2) supplementary score profiles of applicants to a gestational carrier (GC) program. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: S66.Google Scholar

Mindes, E, Sachs, TH, Simpson, TS, Raque-Bogdan, TL, Richter, KS, Covington, SN. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI-2) profiles of applicants to a gestational carrier (GC) program. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: S35.Google Scholar

Jadva, V, Murray, C, Lycett, E. Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate mothers. Hum Reprod 2003 Oct; 18: 2196–2204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Golombok, S, Reading, J, Blake, L, Casey, P, Marks, A, Jadva, V. Families created through surrogacy; mother–child relationship and children's psychological adjustment at age 7. Dev Psychol 2011 Nov; 47(6): 1579–88.Google Scholar

Jadva, V, Blake, I, Casey, P, Golombak, S. Surrogacy families 10 years on: relationship with the surrogate, decisions over disclosure and children's understanding of their surrogacy. Hum Reprod 2012 Oct; 10: 3008–14.Google Scholar

De Wert, G, Dondorp, W, Pennings, G, Shenfield, F, Devroey, P, Tarlatzis, B, et al. Intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 504–9.Google Scholar

American Society for Reproductive Medicine Ethics Committee. Using family members as gamete donors or surrogates. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 797–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baetens, P, Devroey, P, Camus, M, Steirteghem, ACV, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 476–84.Google Scholar

Vayena, E, Golombok, S. Challenges in intra-family donation. In: Richards, M, Pennings, G, Appleby, J, eds. Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2012; 168–88.Google Scholar

Sachs, P, Burns, LH. Recipient counseling for oocyte donation. In: Covington, SN, Burns, LH, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006; 319–38.Google Scholar

Jaffe, J, Diamond, MO. Reproductive Trauma: Psychotherapy with Infertility and Pregnancy Loss Clients. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2011.Google Scholar

Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ACART). Guidelines on Donation of Eggs or Sperm between Certain Family Members. 2013.Google Scholar

American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. The Practice Committees.Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: A committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 47–62.Google Scholar

German Society for Fertility Counseling. Guidelines for psychosocial counseling in the area of gamete donation. BKiD 2008.Google Scholar

Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Counselling Special Interest Group (CSIG). Assisted Human Reproduction Counselling Practice Guidelines. 2009.Google Scholar

Australian & New Zealand Infertility Counsellors Association (ANZICA). Guidelines for Professional Standards of Practice Infertility Counselling, 2003.Google Scholar

American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. The Practice Committee. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: An ASRM practice committee guideline. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 1301–08.Google Scholar

Applegarth, LD, Kingsberg, SA. The donor as patient: assessment and support. In: Covington, SN, Burns, LH, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006; 339–55.Google Scholar

Covington, SN, Patrizio, P. Gestational carriers and surrogacy. In: Sauer, MV, ed. Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation. 2nd edn. New York: Springer; 2013; 277–88.Google Scholar

Hanafin, H. Surrogacy and gestational carrier participants. In: Covington, SN, Burns, LH, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006; 370–86.Google Scholar

MacCallum, F, Lycett, E, Murray, C, Jadva, V, Golombok, S. Surrogacy: the experience of commissioning couples. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1334–42.Google Scholar

Jadva, V, Blake, L, Casey, P, Golombok, S. Surrogacy families 10 years on: relationship with the surrogate, decisions over disclosure and children's understanding of their surrogacy origins. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 3008–14.Google Scholar

Readings, J, Blake, L, Casey, P, Jadva, V, Golombok, S. Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 22: 485–95.Google Scholar

Klock, SC. Disclosure decisions among known and anonymous egg donor recipients. In: , Sauer MV, ed. Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation. 2nd edn. New York: Springer; 2013; 195–276.Google Scholar

Purewal, S, van den Akker, OBA. Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15: 499–515.Google Scholar

Yee, S, Blyth, E, Tsang, AKT. Views of donors and recipients regarding disclosure to children following altruistic known oocyte donation. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23: 851–9.Google Scholar

Yee, S, Hitkari, JA, Greenblattt, EM. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 2040–50.Google Scholar

Josephs, LS, Grill, E, Crone, K, Applegarth, L, Cholst, I, Rosenwaks, Z. Sister ovum donation: psychological outcomes. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: S102.Google Scholar

Winter, A, Daniluk, J. A gift from the heart: the experiences of women whose egg donation helped their sisters become mothers. JCD 2004; 82: 483–95.Google Scholar