Book contents
- Fertility CounselingClinical Guide and Case Studies
- Fertility Counseling
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Book part
- Section 1 Introduction
- Section 2 Therapeutic approaches
- Section 3 Third party reproduction: assessment and preparation
- Chapter 7 Counseling recipients of anonymous donor gametes
- Chapter 8 Counseling anonymous gametedonors
- Chapter 9 Counselingsurrogate carrier participants
- Chapter 10 Counseling known participants in third partyreproduction
- Section 4 The expanding image of families
- Section 5 Special topics in fertility counseling
- Section 6 Practice issues
- Glossary
- Index
- References
Chapter 7 - Counseling recipients of anonymous donor gametes
from Section 3 - Third party reproduction: assessment and preparation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Edited by
Book contents
- Fertility CounselingClinical Guide and Case Studies
- Fertility Counseling
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Book part
- Section 1 Introduction
- Section 2 Therapeutic approaches
- Section 3 Third party reproduction: assessment and preparation
- Chapter 7 Counseling recipients of anonymous donor gametes
- Chapter 8 Counseling anonymous gametedonors
- Chapter 9 Counselingsurrogate carrier participants
- Chapter 10 Counseling known participants in third partyreproduction
- Section 4 The expanding image of families
- Section 5 Special topics in fertility counseling
- Section 6 Practice issues
- Glossary
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fertility CounselingClinical Guide and Case Studies, pp. 97 - 108Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Lutjen, P, Trouson, A, Leeton, J, et al. The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilization and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failure. Nature 1984; 307: 174–75.Google Scholar
Glennon, T. UK and US perspectives on the regulation of gamete donation. In Richards, M, Pennings, G, Appleby, JB, eds. Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012; 90–111.Google Scholar
Haase, JM, Blyth, E. Global perspectives in infertility counseling. In Covington, SN, Burns, LH, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006; 544–57.Google Scholar
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 47–62.Google Scholar
Boivin, J, Kentenich, H, eds. ESHRE Monograph: Guidelines for Counseling in Infertility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Garcia-Ruiz, Y, Guerra-Diaz, D. Gamete and embryo donation: a legal view from Spain. In Richards, M, Pennings, G, Appleby, JB, eds. Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012; 112–29.Google Scholar
Hershberger, P. Recipients of oocyte donation: an integrative review. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2004; 33: 610–21.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, ML, Smith, JF, Millstein, SG, et al. Perceived negative consequences of donor gametes from male and female members of infertile couples. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 921–6.Google Scholar
Lindeim, SR, Kavi, S, Sauer, M. Understanding differences in the perception of anonymous parties: a comparison between gamete donors and their recipients. J Assist Reprod Genetics 2000; 17: 127–30.Google Scholar
Tarlatzis, BC, Pakos, G. Oocyte donation: Clinical and practical aspects. Moll Cell Endocrinol 2000; 161: 99–102.Google Scholar
Greil, A, Slauson-Blevins, K, McQuillan, J. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Health Illn 2010; 32: 140–62.Google Scholar
Sachs, PL, Burns, LH. Recipient counseling for oocyte donation. In Covington, SN, Burns, LH, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006; 319–38.Google Scholar
Burns, LH, Greenfeld, DA. CPHI: Comprehensive psychosocial history for infertility. In Covington, SN, Burns, LH, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006; 563–64.Google Scholar
Covington, SN. Group approaches to infertility counseling. In Covington, SN, Burns, LH, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006; 157–68.Google Scholar
Thorn, P, Daniels, KR. A group-work approach in family building by donor insemination: empowering the marginalized. Hum Fert 2003; 6: 46–50.Google Scholar
Pennings, G, Gurtin, ZB. The legal and ethical regulation of transnational donation. In Richards, M, Pennings, G, Appleby, JB, eds. Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006; 130–49.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, K, Johnson, L, Bourne, K, et al. Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response. Hum Reprod 2013 Dec 6. [Epub ahead of print].Google ScholarPubMed
Bratt, S, Sacrannie, RR, Thomas, GE, et al. Can we improve recruitment of oocyte donors with loss of donor anonymity? A hospital-based survey. Hum Fertil 2008; 11: 101–7.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by