Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T21:50:49.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Pleading

The Matter in Controversy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

James R. Maxeiner
Affiliation:
University of Baltimore
Gyooho Lee
Affiliation:
University School of Law, Seoul
Armin Weber
Affiliation:
Court of Appeals, Munich
Philip K. Howard
Affiliation:
Covington & Burling, LLP
Get access

Summary

Mary Roh has decided to sue. She has a lawyer; she has a court. Now she is ready to bring her case to court. Starting a lawsuit requires that she tell the court what it is that she wants. Otherwise, the court will not know which matters it is to decide and which remedies, if any, it is to order. What the court is to decide – the matter in controversy – is fundamental to all three of our systems of civil procedure.

In all three of our systems, plaintiffs begin lawsuits by telling courts what they want from whom. They answer the classic question that American law professors pose to their first-year students: Who is suing whom for what? Plaintiffs do this in documents called complaints. Defendants are formally “served with process,” that is, they are informed of the lawsuit and are formally given the complaint. Defendants are “summoned” to appear within a certain period of time (usually, less than a month) and, if they do not, they are deemed in default. They respond either in documents called “answers” or in motions to the court. Plaintiffs may reply to these answers and motions. Collectively, this written give and take between the parties at the beginning of the lawsuit constitutes the pleadings.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

James, Fleming 14 Vanderbilt L. Rev 1961
Maxeiner, James R. 49 Sup. Ct. L. Rev 2010
Hazard, Geoffrey C. 76 Tex L. Rev 1998
Kourlis, Rebecca LoveSinger, Jordan M.Knowlton, Natalie 87 Denver U. L. Rev 2010
Fairman, Christopher M. 45 Ariz. L. Rev 2003
Subrin, Stephen N.Main, Thomas O. 79 Notre Dame L. Rev 2004
Spencer, A. Benjamin 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev 2010
Maxeiner, James R. 114 Penn State L. Rev 2010
Fee, James Alger 48 Colum. L. Rev 1948CrossRef
Kwon, Youngjoon 7 J. Korean L 2007
Kim, Hyun Seok 7 J. Korean L 2007
Ho, Moon-HyuckRechtsreform und Deutschland und Korea im Vergleich 87 2006

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×