Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T14:02:25.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

34 - Odontoceti

from Part VI - Marine mammals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2010

Christine M. Janis
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Gregg F. Gunnell
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Mark D. Uhen
Affiliation:
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, O. (1900). Untersuchungen über die fossilen Platanistiden des Wiener Beckens. Denkschriften der Koniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Munich, 68, 839–74.Google Scholar
Abel, O. (1901). Les dauphins longirostres du Boldérien (Miocène supérieur) des environs d'Anvers. Mémoires du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 1, 1–95.Google Scholar
Abel, O. (1905). Les Odontocètes du Boldérien (Miocène supérieur) D'Anvers. Mémoires du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 3, 1–155.Google Scholar
Abel, O. (1909). Cetaceenstudien. I. Mitteilung: Das Skelett von Eurhinodelphis cocheteuxi aus dem Ober-miozän von Antwerpen. Sitzungsberichte Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 118, 241–53.Google Scholar
Abel, O. (1913). Die vorfahren der bartenwale. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 90, 155–224.Google Scholar
Agassiz, L. (1848). Dorudon serratus and Saurocetus gibbesii. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 4, 4–5.Google Scholar
Allen, G. M. (1921a). A new fossil cetacean. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 65, 1–13.Google Scholar
Allen, G. M. (1921b). Fossil cetaceans from the Florida phosphate beds. Journal of Mammalogy, 2, 144–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, G. M. (1924a). The type-specimen of Saurocetus gibbesii Agassiz. Journal of Mammalogy 5, 120–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, G. M. (1924b). The Delphinus occiduus of Leidy. Journal of Mammalogy, 5, 194–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, G. M. (1926). Fossil mammals from South Carolina. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 67, 447–67.Google Scholar
Allen, G. M. (1941). A fossil river dolphin from Florida. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 89, 3–8.Google Scholar
Allen, J. A. (1887). Note on squalodont remains from Charleston, S. C. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2, 35–9.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1878). Anatomical and Zoological Researches: Comprising an Account of the Zoological Results of Two Expeditions to Western Yunnan in 1868 and 1875; and a Monograph of the Two Cetacean Genera, Platanista and Orcaella. London: Bernard Quaritch.Google Scholar
Aranda-Manteca, F. J. and Barnes, L. G. (1993). Nuevos especimens de la beluga fosil, Denebola Barnes, 1984 (Cetacaea, Monodontidae) de Isla de Cedros, Mexico. Memorias Sociedad Geológica Peninsular, 2, 19.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. W. and Heinsohn, G. E. (1996). Phylogenetic status of the Irrawaddy dolphin Orcaella brevirostris (Owen in Gray): a cladistic analysis. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 39, 141–204.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G. (1973). Praekogia cedrosensis, a new genus and species of fossil pygmy sperm whale from Isla Cedros, Baja California, Mexico. Contributions in Science, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, 247, 1–20.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G.(1977). Outline of eastern North Pacific fossil cetacean assemblages. Systematic Zoology, 25, 321–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, L. G.(1978). A review of Lophocetus and Liolithax and their relationships to the delphinoid family Kentriodontidae (Cetacea: Odontoceti). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles Science, 28, 1–35.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G.(1984). Fossil odontocetes (Mammalia: Cetacea) from the Almejas Formation, Isla Cedros, Mexico. PaleoBios, 42, 1–46.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G.(1985a). [Review: Mchedlidze, G. A. (1984). General features of the paleobiological evolution of Cetacea.]Marine Mammal Science, 1, 90–3.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G.(1985b). Fossil pontoporiid dolphins (Mammalia: Cetacea) from the Pacific coast of North AmericaContributions in Science, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, 363, 1–34.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G.(1985c). The Late Miocene Dolphin Pithanodelphis Abel, 1905 (Cetacea: Kentriodontidae) from California. Contributions in Science, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, 367, 1–27.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G. (1985d). Evolution, taxonomy and antitropical distributions of the porpoises (Phocoenidae, Mammalia). Marine Mammal Science, 1, 149–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, L. G. (1988). A late Miocene dolphin, Pithanodelphis nasalis, from Orange County, California. Memoirs of the Natural History Foundation of Orange County: The Natural and Social Sciences of Orange County, 2, 7–21.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G. (1990). The fossil record and evolutionary relationships of the genus Tursiops. In The Bottlenose Dolphin, ed. Leatherwood, S. and Reeves, R. R., pp. 3–26. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G. (1998). The sequence of fossil marine mammal assemblages in Mexico. Advances en InvestigaciónSpecial Publication, 1, 26–79.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G.(2002). An Early Miocene long-snouted marine platanistid dolphin (Mammalia, Cetacea, Odontoceti) from the Korneuburg Basin (Austria). Beiträge Paläontologie, 27, 407–18.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G. and Goedert, J. L. (2000). The world's oldest known odontocete (Mammalia, Cetacea). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 20(suppl. to no. 3), p. 28A.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G. and Mitchell, E. D. (1984). Kentriodon obscurus (Kellogg, 1931), a fossil dolphin (Mammalia: Kentriodontidae) from the Miocene Sharktooth Hill Bonebed in California. Contributions in Science, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, 353, 1–23.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G., Howard, H., Hutchinson, J. H., and Welton, B. J. (1981). The vertebrate fossils of the marine Cenozoic San Mateo Formation at Oceanside, California. In Geologic Investigations of the Coastal Plain; San Diego County, California, ed. Abbott, P. L. and O'Dunn, S., pp. 53–70. San Diego, CA: San Diego Association of Geologists.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G., Domning, D. P., and Ray, C. E. (1985). Status of studies on fossil marine mammals. Marine Mammal Science, 1, 15–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, L. G., Goedert, J. L., and Furusawa, H. (2001). The earliest known echolocating toothed whales (Mammalia; Odontoceti): preliminary observations of fossils from Washington State. Mesa Southwest Museum Bulletin, 8, 91–100.Google Scholar
Best, R. C. and da Silva, V. M. F. 1989. Amazon River dolphin, boto. Inia geoffrensis (de Blainville, 1817). In Handbook of Marine Mammals, Vol. 4: River Dolphins and the Larger Toothed Whales, ed. Ridgway, S. H. and Harrison, R. J., pp. 1–23. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bianucci, G. (1996). The Odontoceti (Mammalia, Cetacea) from Italian Pliocene. Systematics and phylogenesis of Delphinidae. Palaeontographia Italia, 83, 73–167.Google Scholar
Bianucci, G. (2001). A new genus of kentriodontid (Cetacea: Odontoceti) from the Miocene of South Italy. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 21, 573–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianucci, G. and Landini, W. (1999). Kogia pusilla from the middle Pliocene of Tuscany (Italy) and a phylogenetic analysis of the family Kogiidae (Odontoceti, Cetacea). Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 105, 445–53.Google Scholar
Bianucci, G. and Varola, A. (1994). Kentriodontidae (Odontoceti, Cetacea) from Miocene sediments of the Pietra Leccese (Apulia, Italy). Atti della Società Toscana di Scienze Naturali Residente in Pisa. Serie A, 101, 201–12.Google Scholar
Bianucci, G., Landini, W., and Varola, A. (1992). Messapicetus longirostris, a new genus and species of Ziphiidae (Cetacea) from the late Miocene of “Pietra leccese” (Apulia, Italy). Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 31, 261–4.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. D. (1838). Sur les cachalots. Annales Françaises et Etrangeres d'Anatomie et de Physiologie, 2, 335–7.Google Scholar
Bohaska, D. J. (1998). Fossil marine mammals of the lower Miocene Pollack Farm Site, Delaware. [In Geology and Paleontology of the Lower Miocene Pollack Farm Fossil Site, Delaware, ed. Benson, R. N..] Special Publication of the Delaware Geological Survey, 21, 178–91.Google Scholar
Brandt, J. F. (1873). Untersuchungen über die fossilen und subfossilen cetaceen Europa's. Mémoires de L'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg, Series 7, 20, 1–372.Google Scholar
Brownell, R. L. (1989). Franciscana, Pontoporia blainvillei (Gervais and d'Orbigny 1844). In Handbook of Marine Mammals, Vol. 4: River Dolphins and the Larger Toothed Whales, ed. Ridgway, S. H. and Harrison, R. J., pp. 45–67. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brownell, R. L. and Herald, E. S. (1972). Lipotes vexillifer. Mammalian Species, 10, 1–4.Google Scholar
Case, E. C. (1904). Mammalia. In Maryland Geological Survey, Miocene, ed. Clark, W. B., pp. 3–58. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Case, E. C. (1934). A specimen of a long-nose dolphin from the Bone Valley gravels of Polk County, Florida. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 4, 105–13.Google Scholar
Cassens, I., Vicario, S., Waddell, V. G., et al. (2000). Independent adaptation to riverine habitats allowed survival of ancient cetacean lineages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 11 343–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen,, P. 1989. Baiji. Lipotes vexillifer Miller, 1918. In Handbook of Marine Mammals, Vol. 4: River Dolphins and the Larger Toothed Whales, ed. Ridgway, S. H. and Harrison, R. J., pp. 25–43. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. R. (2003). Production and control of sound by the small sperm whales, Kogia breviceps and K. sima and their implications for other Cetacea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association UK, 83, 241–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, E. D. (1868a). An addition to the vertebrate fauna of the Miocene period, with a synopsis of the extinct Cetacea of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 19, 138–56.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1868b). Second contribution to the history of the Vertebrata of the Miocene period of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 20, 184–94.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1868c). [Extinct Cetacea from the Miocene bed of Maryland.]Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 20, 150–60.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1869a). Synopsis of the extinct Mammalia of the cave formations in the United States, with observations on some Myriopoda found in and near the same, and on some extinct mammals of the caves of Anguilla, W. I., and of other localities. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 11, 171–92.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1869b). On two new genera of extinct Cetacea. The American Naturalist, 3, 444–5.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1869c). Third contribution to the fauna of the Miocene period of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 21, 6–12.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1875). Synopsis of the vertebrata of the Miocene of Cumberland County, New Jersey. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 14, 361–4.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1890). The Cetacea. The American Naturalist, 24, 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1895). Fourth contribution to the marine fauna of the Miocene period of the United States. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 34, 135–55.Google Scholar
Cozzuol, M. A. (1985). The Odontoceti of the “Mesopotamiense” of the Parana River ravines. Systematic review. Investigations on Cetacea, 7, 39–53.Google Scholar
Cozzuol, M. A.(1996). The record of the aquatic mammals in southern South America. Münchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen (A), 30, 321–42.Google Scholar
Cranford, T. W. (1999). The sperm whale's nose: sexual selection on a grand scale?Marine Mammal Science, 15, 1133–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranford, T. W., Amundin, M., and Norris, K. S. (1996). Functional morphology and homology in the odontocete nasal complex: implications for sound generation. Journal of Morphology, 228, 223–85.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuvier, G. (1823). Des Ossemens fossiles de Narvals et de Cetacés voisins des Hyperoodons et des Cachalots. Recherches sur les Ossemens Fossiles, 5, 349–57.Google Scholar
Dalebout, M. L., Helden, A., Waerebeek, K., and Baker, C. S. (1998). Molecular genetic identification of Southern Hemisphere beaked whales (Cetacea: Ziphiidae). Molecular Ecology, 7, 687–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalebout, M. L., Helden, A., Waerebeek, K., and Baker, C. S. (2002). A new species of beaked whale Mesoplodon perrini sp. n. (Cetacea: Ziphiidae) discovered through phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Marine Mammal Science, 18, 577–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaz, Dal G. (1917). Gli Odontoceti del Miocene Bellunese, Parte Terza: Squalodelphis fabianii. Memoirie Dell'Instituto Geologico Della R. Università Di Padova, 5, 1–34.Google Scholar
Dawson, S. D. (1996a). A new kentriodontid dolphin (Cetacea; Delphinoidea) from the middle Miocene Choptank Formation, Maryland. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16, 135–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, S. D.(1996b). A description of the skull and postcrania of Hadrodelphis calvertense Kellogg 1966 and its position within the Kentriodontidae (Cetacea; Delphinoidea). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16, 125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooley, A. C. Jr. (1993). The vertebrate fauna of the Calvert Formation (middle Miocene) at the Caroline Stone Quarry, Caroline County, VA. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 13(suppl. to no. 3), p. 33A.Google Scholar
Dooley, A. C. Jr.(1996). A newly recognized species of Squalodon (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the Miocene of the middle Atlantic Coastal Plain. Paleontological Society, Special Publication, 8, 107.Google Scholar
Dooley, A. C. Jr.(2003). A review of the eastern North American Squalodontidae (Mammalia: Cetacea). Jeffersoniana, 11, 1–26.Google Scholar
Dooley, A. C. Jr.(2005). A new species of Squalodon (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the Middle Miocene of Virginia. Virginia Museum of Natural History Memoir, 8, 1–14.Google Scholar
Dooley, A. C. Jr., Fraser, N. C., and Luo, Z. (2004). The earliest known member of the rorqual-gray whale clade (Mammalia, Cetacea). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 24, 453–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorr, J. A. Jr. and Eschleman, D. F. (1970). Geology of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bus, Du B. A. L. (1867). Sur quelques Mammifères du crag d'Anvers. Bulletins de l'Académie Royal des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, 24, 562–77.
Bus, Du B. A. L.(1872). Mammifères nouveaux du Crag d'Anvers. Bulletin de l'Académie des Sciences de Belgique, 34, 491–509.Google Scholar
Duvernoy, G.-L. (1851). Caractères ostéologiques des genres nouveaux ou des espèces nouvelles de cétacés vivants ou fossiles. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 15, 5–71.Google Scholar
Flower, W. H. (1864). Notes on the skeletons of whales in the principal museums of Holland and Belgium, with descriptions of two species apparently new to science. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1864, 384–420.Google Scholar
Flower, W. H.(1867). Description of the skeleton of Inia geoffrensis and the skull of Pontoporia blainvillii. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, 6, 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, W. H.(1868). On the osteology of the cachalot or sperm-whale (Physeter macrocephalus). Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, 6, 309–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, W. H.(1872). On the recent ziphioid whales, with a description of the skeleton of Berardius arnouxi. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, 8, 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, R. E. (1981). Systematics of the odontocete whale Agorophius pygmaeus and the Family Agorophiidae (Mammalia: Cetacea). Journal of Paleontology, 55, 1028–45.Google Scholar
Fordyce, R. E.(1983). Rhabdosteid dolphins (Mammalia: Cetacea) from the middle Miocene, Lake Frome area, South Australia. Alcheringa, 7, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, R. E.(1994). Waipatia maerewhenua, new genus and new species (Waipatiidae, new family), an archaic late Oligocene dolphin (Cetacea: Odontoceti: Platanistoidea) from New Zealand. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 147–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, R. E.(2002). Simocetus rayi (Odontoceti: Simocetidae, New Family): a bizarre new archaic Oligocene dolphin from the eastern North Pacific. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 185–222.Google Scholar
Fordyce, R. E. and Muizon, C., de (2001). Evolutionary history of cetaceans: a review. In Secondary Adaptation of Tetrapods to Life in Water, ed. Mazin, J.-M. and Buffrénil, V., pp. 169–223. Munich: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar
Fraser, F. C. and Purves, P. E. (1960). Hearing in cetaceans: evolution of the accessory air sacs and the structure of the outer and middle ear in recent cetaceans. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology, 7, 1–140.Google Scholar
Geisler, J. H. and Sanders, A. E. (2003). Morphological evidence for the phylogeny of Cetacea. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 10, 23–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, P. (1850). Sur la famille des cétacés ziphioides, et plus particulierment sur le Ziphius cavirostris de la Méditerranée. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Partie Zoologique, 24, 5–17.Google Scholar
Gervais, P.(1853). Description de quelques ossements fossiles de phoques et de cétacés. Mémoires de l'Académie des Sciences et Lettres de Montpellier, 2, 307–14.Google Scholar
Gervais, P.(1855). [Tursiops, new name for Tursio.] Histoire Naturelle des Mammifères, avec l'Indication de leurs Moeurs, et de leurs Rapports avec les Arts, le Commerce et l'Agriculture. Paris: L. Curmer.Google Scholar
Gervais, P.(1861). Sur différentes espèces de vertébrés fossils observées pour la plupart dans le midi de la France. Mémoires de la Section des Sciences Académie des Sciences et Lettres de Montpellier, 5, 117–32.Google Scholar
Gervais, P. and d'Orbigny, A. (1844). Mammalogie. Société Philomatique de Paris. Extraits des Procès-verbaux des Séances, 1844, 38–40.Google Scholar
Gill, T. (1871). The sperm whales, giant and pygmy. The American Naturalist, 4, 725–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, T.(1872). Arrangement of the families of mammals and synoptical tables of characters of the subdivisions of mammals. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 11, 1–98.Google Scholar
Gillette, D. D. (1975). Catalogue of the type specimens of fossil vertebrates, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia. Introduction and Part I: marine mammals. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 127, 63–6.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, L. (1990). Les quatre faunes de mammifères Miocènes des faluns du synclinal d'Esvres (Val-de-Loire, France). Comptes Rendus de L'Académie des Sciences, Série II, 310, 89–93.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. (1947). A fossil beaked whale from Lakes Entrance, Victoria. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 58, 25–35.Google Scholar
Gondar, D. (1975). La presencia de cetaceos (Physeteridae) en el Terciario superior (Rionegrense) de la Prov. de Rio Negro. Actas del Congreso Argentino de Paleontologia y Bioestratigrafia, 2, 349–56.Google Scholar
Gottfried, M. D., Bohaska, D. J., and Whitmore, F. C. Jr. (1994). Miocene cetaceans of the Chesapeake group. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 229–38.Google Scholar
Grateloup, J. P. S. (1840). Description d'un fragment de mâchoire fossile, d'un genre nouveau de reptile (saurien), de taille gigantesque, voisin de l'Iguanodon, trouvé dans le Grès Marin, à Léognan, près Bordeaux. Actes de l'Académie National des Sciences, Belles-lettres et Artes de Bordeaux, 2, 201–10.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. (1821). On the natural arrangement of vertebrose animals. London Medical Repository, 15, 296–310.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E.(1825). Outline of an attempt at the disposition of the Mammalia into tribes and families with a list of genera apparently appertaining to each tribe. Philosophical Annals, 26, 337–44.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E.(1846). On the cetaceous animals. In The Zoology of the Voyage of HMS Erebus and Terror, under the Command of Capt. Sir J. C. Ross, RN, FRS, during the years 1839 to 1843, ed. Richardson, J. and Gray, J. E., pp. 13–53. London: E. W. Janson.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E.(1863). On the arrangement of the cetaceans. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1863, 197–202.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E.(1865). Notice of a new genus of delphinoid whales from the Cape of Good Hope, and of other cetaceans from the same seas. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London, 1865, 522–9.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E.(1866). Notes on the skulls of dolphins, or bottlenose whales, in the British Museum. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 1866, 211–16.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E.(1868). Synopsis of the Species of Whales and Dolphins in the Collection of the British Museum. London: Bernard Quaritch.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E.(1870). Notes on the arrangement of the genera of delphinoid whales. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1870, 772–3.Google Scholar
Gregory, W. K. and Kellogg, R. (1927). A fossil porpoise from California. American Museum Novitates, 269, 1–7.Google Scholar
Harington, C. R. (1988). The Late Quaternary Development of the Champlain Sea Basin. In Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, No. 35: Marine Mammals of the Champlain Sea, and the Problem of Whales in Michigan, ed. Gadd, N. R., pp. 225–40. Ottawa: Geological Association of Canada.Google Scholar
Harlan, R. (1842). Description of a new extinct species of dolphin from Maryland. Bulletin and Proceedings of the National Institution for the Promotion of Science, Washington, 2, 95–196.Google Scholar
Hay, O. P. (1902). Bibliography and Catalogue of the Fossil Vertebrata of North America. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershkovitz, P. (1966). Catalog of living whales. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 246, 1–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyning, J. E. (1989a). Comparative facial anatomy of beaked whales (Ziphiidae) and a systematic revision among the families of extant Odontoceti. Contributions in Science, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, 405, 1–64.Google Scholar
Heyning, J. E.(1989b). Cuvier's beaked whale Ziphius cavirostris G. Cuvier, 1823. In Handbook of Marine Mammals, Vol. 4: River Dolphins and the Larger Toothed Whales, ed. Ridgway, S. H and Harrison, R. J., pp. 289–308. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heyning, J. E.(1997). Sperm whale phylogeny revisited: analysis of the morphological evidence. Marine Mammal Science, 13, 596–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirota, K. and Barnes, L. G. (1995). A new species of middle Miocene sperm whale of the genus Scaldicetus (Cetacea; Physeteridae) from Shiga-mura, Japan. The Island Arc, 3, 453–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, J. A. (1995). Ancient Life of the Great Lakes Basin. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulbert, R. C. Jr. and Whitmore, R. C. Jr. (2006). Late Miocene mammals from the Mauvilla Local Fauna, Alabama. Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History, 46, 1–28.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. (1864). On the cetacean fossils termed “Ziphius” by Cuvier, with a notice of a new species (Belemnoziphius compressus) from the Red Crag. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 20, 388–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichishima, H. (1995). A new fossil kentriodontid dolphin (Cetacea: Kentriodontidae): from the Middle Miocene Takinoue Formation, Hokkaido, Japan. The Island Arc, 3, 473–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichishima, H. and Kimura, M. (2000). A new fossil porpoise (Cetacea; Delphinoidea; Phocoenidae) from the early Pliocene Horokaoshirarika Formation, Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 20, 561–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichishima, H., Barnes, L. G., Fordyce, R. E., Kimura, M., and Bohaska, D. J. (1995). A review of kentriodontine dolphins (Cetacea; Delphinoidea; Kentriodontidae): systematics and biogeography. The Island Arc, 3, 486–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasuya, T. (1973). Systematic consideration of recent toothed whales based on the morphology of tympano-periotic bone. Scientific Reports of the Whales Research Institute, 25, 1–103.Google Scholar
Kazár, E. (2002). Revised phylogeny of the Physeteridae (Mammalia: Cetacea) in the light of Placoziphius Van Beneden, 1869 and Aulophyseter Kellogg, 1927. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 72, 150–70.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. (1923a). Description of an apparently new toothed cetacean from South Carolina. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 76, 1–7.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1923b). Description of two squalodonts recently discovered in the Calvert Cliffs, Maryland, and notes on the shark-toothed cetaceans. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 62, 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1924). A fossil porpoise from the Calvert Formation of Maryland. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 63, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1925a). On the occurrence of remains of fossil porpoises of the genus Eurhinodelphis in North America. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 66, 1–40.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1925b). Additions to the Tertiary history of the pelagic mammals on the Pacific coast of North America. I. Two fossil physeteroid whales from California. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 348, 1–34.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1925c). A fossil physteroid cetacean form Santa Barbara County California. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 66, 1–8.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1926). Supplementary observations on the skull of the fossil porpoise Zarhachis flagellator Cope. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 67, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1927a). Study of the skull of a fossil sperm-whale from the Temblor Miocene of Southern California. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 346, 1–24.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1927b). Kentriodon pernix, a Miocene porpoise from Maryland. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 69, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1928). The history of whales: their adaptation to life in the water. Quarterly Review of Biology, 3, 29–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1929). A new fossil toothed whale from Florida. American Museum Novitates, 389, 1–9.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1931). Pelagic mammals from the Temblor Formation of the Kern River region, California. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 19, 217–397.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1932). A Miocene long-beaked porpoise from California. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 87, 1–11.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1944). Fossil cetaceans from the Florida Tertiary. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 94, 433–71.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1955). Three Miocene porpoises from the Calvert Cliffs, Maryland. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 105, 101–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1957). Two additional Miocene porpoises from the Calvert Cliffs Maryland. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 107, 279–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1959). Description of the skull of Pomatodelphis inaequalis Allen. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 121, 1–26.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1965). Fossil marine mammals from the Miocene Calvert Formation of Maryland and Virginia. Part 2. The Miocene Calvert sperm whale Orycterocetus. Bulletin of the Smithsonian Institution, 247, 47–63.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1966). Fossil marine mammals from the Miocene Calvert formation of Maryland and Virginia. Part 4. A new odontocete from the Calvert Miocene of Maryland. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 247, 90–101.Google Scholar
Kernan, J. D. (1919). The skull of Ziphius cavirostris. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 28, 349–93.Google Scholar
Lacépede, B. G. E. (1804). Histoire Naturelle des Cetaces. Paris: Chez Plassan.Google Scholar
Lambert, O. (2004). Systematic revision of the Miocene long-snouted dolphin Eurhinodelphis longirostris Du Bus, 1872 (Cetacea, Odontoceti, Eurhinodelphinidae). Bulletin de l'Institute Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre, 74, 147–74.Google Scholar
(2005a). Phylogenetic affinities of the long-snouted dolphin Eurhino-delphis (Cetacea, Odontoceti) from the Miocene of Antwerp, Belgium. Palaeontology, 48, 653–79.CrossRef
Lambert, O.(2005b). Review of the Miocene long-snouted dolphin Priscodelphinus cristatus DuBus, 1872 (Cetacea, Odontoceti) and phylogeny among eurhinodelphinids. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgiques, Sciences de la Terre, 75, 211–35.Google Scholar
(2005c). Systematics and phylogeny of the fossil beaked whale Z. phirostrum du Bus, 1868 and Choneziphius Duvernay 1851 (Mammalia, Cetacea, Odontoceti), from the Neogene of Antwerp (North Belgium). Geodiversitas, 27, 443–93.
LeDuc, R. G., Perrin, W. F., and Dizon, A. E. (1999). Phylogenetic relationships among the delphinid cetaceans based on full cytochrome b sequences. Marine Mammal Science, 15, 619–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leidy, J. (1851). [Descriptions of a number of fossil reptiles and mammals.]Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 5, 325–82.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1853). [Observations on extinct Cetacea.]Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 6, 377–8.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1856). Notices of remains of extinct vertebrated animals of New Jersey, collected by Prof. Cook of the State Geological Survey under the direction of Dr. W. Kitchell. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 8, 220–21.Google Scholar
Leidy, J.(1859). [Remarks on Dromatherium sylvestre and Ontocetus emmonsi.]Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 11, 162.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1869). The extinct mammalian fauna of Dakota and Nebraska, including an account of some allied forms from other localities, together with a synopsis of the mammalian remains of North America. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 2, 1–472.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1870). [Description of Graphiodon vinearis and remarks on Crocodilus elliotti.] Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 1870, 122.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1876a). Remarks on fossils from the Ashley Phosphate Beds. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 1876, 80–1.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1876b). Remarks on fossils of the Ashley Phosphate Beds. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 1876, 114–15.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1876c). Remarks on vertebrate fossils from the phosphate beds of South Carolina. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 1876, 86–7.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1877). Description of vertebrate remains, chiefly from the phosphate beds of South Carolina. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 8, 209–61.Google Scholar
Lesson, R.-P. (1828). In Complément des oeuvres de Buffon ou Histoire Naturelle des animaux rares découverts par les naturalists et les voyageurs depuis la mort de Buffon, Vol. 1: Cétacés.Paris.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus and Differentiis, 10th edn, Reformata, Vol. I. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar
Lull, R. S. (1914). Fossil dolphin from California. American Journal of Science, 37, 209–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Z. and Gingerich, P. D. (1999). Terrestrial Mesonychia to aquatic Cetacea: transformation of the basicranium and evolution of hearing in whales. University of Michigan Papers on Paleontology, 31, 1–98.Google Scholar
Luo, Z. and Marsh, K. (1996). Petrosal (periotic) and inner ear of a Pliocene kogiine whale (Kogiinae, Odontoceti): implications on relationships and hearing evolution of toothed whales. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16, 328–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lydekker, R. (1894). Cetacean skulls from Patagonia. Annales del Museo de la Plata, Paleontología Argentina, II, 1–13.Google Scholar
Marino, L., McShea, D. W., and Uhen, M. D. (2004). The origin(s) and evolution of large brains in toothed whales. Anatomical Record, 281A, 1247–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mchedlidze, G. A. (1970). Nekotorye Obschie Cherty Istorii Kitoobraznykh, Vol. 1. Tiblishi, Georgia: Metsniyereba.Google Scholar
McKenna, M. C. and Bell, S. K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, J. G. (1975a). Anatomy of the external nasal passages and facial complex in the Delphinidae (Mammalia: Cetacea). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 207, 1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, J. G. (1975b). A fossil beaked whale (Cetacea: Ziphiidae) from the Miocene of Kenya. Journal of Paleontology, 49, 743–51.Google Scholar
Mead, J. G. (1989). Beaked whales of the genus Mesoplodon. In Handbook of Marine Mammals, Vol. 4: River Dolphins and the Larger Toothed Whales, ed. Ridgway, S. H and Harrison, R. J., pp. 349–430. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Messenger, S. L. (1994). Phylogenetic relationships of platanistoid river dolphins (Odontoceti, Cetacea): Assessing the significance of fossil taxa. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 125–33.Google Scholar
Messenger, S. L. and McGuire, J. A. (1998). Morphology, molecules and the phylogenetics of cetaceans. Systematic Biology, 47, 90–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. S. Jr. (1918). A new river-dolphin from China. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 68, 1–12.Google Scholar
Miller, G. S. Jr. (1923). The telescoping of the cetacean skull. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 76, 1–71.Google Scholar
Montagu, G. (1821). Description of a species of Delphinus, which appears to be new. Memoirs of the Wernerian Natural History Society, 3, 75–82.Google Scholar
Moore, J. C. (1968). Relationships among the living genera of beaked whales with classifications, diagnoses and keys. Fieldiana: Zoology, 53, 209–398.Google Scholar
Moreno, F. P. (1892). Lijeros apuntes sobre dos géneros de cetáceos fosiles de la República Argentina. Revista Museo de La Plata, 3, 381–400.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. S. (1994). Miocene and Pliocene marine mammal faunas from the Bone Valley Formation of central Florida. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 239–68.Google Scholar
Muizon, C. (1983a). A new Ziphiidae (Cetacea) from the Lower Pliocene of Peru. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, 297, 85–8.Google Scholar
Muizon, C.(1983b). A new Phocoenidae (Cetacea) from the lower Pliocene of Peru. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, 296, 1203–6.Google Scholar
Muizon, C.(1984). Les vertébrés fossiles de la Formation Pisco (Pérou), Part 2: les Odontocetes (Cetacea, Mammalia) du Pliocene inferieur de Sus-Sacaco. Institut Francais d'tudes Andines, 50, 9–175.Google Scholar
Muizon, C.(1987). The affinities of Notocetus vanbenedeni, an early Miocene platanistoid (Cetacea, Mammalia) from Patagonia, southern Argentina. American Museum Novitiates, 2904, 1–27.Google Scholar
Muizon, C.(1988a). Les relations phylogénétiques des Delphinida (Cetacea, Mammalia). Annales de Paléontologie, 74, 159–227.Google Scholar
Muizon, C.(1988b). Les vertébrés fossils de la Formation Pisco (Pérou): les odontocétes (Cetacea, Mammalia) du Miocene. Éditions Recherche sur les Civilisations, Mémoire, 78, 1–244.Google Scholar
Muizon, C.(1988c). Le polyphylétisme des Acrodelphidae, Odontocètes longirostres du Miocène européen. Bulletin du Muséum Nationale d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, Série 4, 10C, 31–88.Google Scholar
Muizon, C.(1991). A new Ziphiidae (Cetacea) from the Early Miocene of Washington State (USA) and phylogenetic analysis of the major groups of odontocetes. Bulletin du Muséum Nationale d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 12, 279–326.Google Scholar
Muizon, C.(1993). Walrus-like feeding adaptation in a new cetacean from the Pliocene of Peru. Nature, 365, 745–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muizon, C.(1994). Are the squalodonts related to the platanistoids?Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 135–46.Google Scholar
Muizon, C. and DeVries, T. J. (1985). Geology and paleontology of the Cenozoic marine deposits in the Sacaco area (Peru). Geologische Rundschau, 74, 547–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muizon, C., Domning, D. P., and Parish, M. (1999). Dimorphic tusks and adaptive strategies in a new species of walrus-like dolphin (Odobenocetopsidae) from the Pliocene of Peru. Comptes Rendus Adadémie des Sciences, 329, 449–55.Google Scholar
Müller, J. (1849). Über die fossilen Reste der Zeuglodonten von Nordamerica. Berlin: von G. Reimer.
Myrick, A. C. Jr. (1979). Variation, taphonomy, and adaptation of the Rhabdosteidae (= Eurhinodelphidae) (Odontoceti, Mammalia) from the Calvert Formation of Maryland and Virginia. Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
Nikaido, M., Matsuno, F., Hamilton, H., et al. (2001). Retroposon analysis of major cetacean lineages: the monophyly of toothed whales and the paraphyly of river dolphins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 98, 7384–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, R. M. (2003). Walker's Marine Mammals of the World. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nowak, R. M. and Paradiso, J. L. (1983). Walker's Mammals of the World, 4th edn. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Okazaki, Y. (1992). An occurrence of a fossil sperm whale from the Miocene Mizunami Group, central Japan. Mizunami-shi Kaseki Hakubutsukan kenkyu hokoku, 19, 295–9.Google Scholar
Owen, R. (1846). A History of British Fossil Mammals and Birds. London: Van Voorst.Google Scholar
Owen, R.(1889). Monograph on the British Fossil Cetacea from the Red Crag. No. 1, containing genus Ziphius. Palaeontographical Society, 1–40.Google Scholar
Pallas, P. S. (1776). Reise durch verschiedene Provinzen de Russischen Reichs. [Voyage dans differentes provinces de l'empire de Russie.] St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Pedroni, P. M. (1845). Note sur une espèce du genre Dauphin. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, 21, 1181.
Perrin, W. F. (1998). Stenella longirostris. Mammalian Species, 599, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, W. F. and Brownell, R. L. Jr. (2001). Update of the list of recognized species of cetaceans. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management, 3, 364–6.Google Scholar
Perrin, W. F., Würsig, B., and Thewissen, J. G. M. (eds.) (2002). Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R., Bitboul, C. Z., Moore, G. W., and Niem, A. R. (2002). Magnetic stratigraphy and tectonic rotation of the Oligocene Alsea, Yaquina, and Nye Formations, Lincoln County, Oregon. In Magnetic Stratigraphy of the Pacific Coast Cenozoic, Book 9, ed. Prothero, D. R., pp. 184–94, Tulsa, OK: Pacific Section of the Society for Sedimentary Geology.Google Scholar
Raven, H. C. and Gregory, W. K. (1933). The spermaceti organ and nasal passages of the sperm whale (Physeter catodon) and other odontocetes. American Museum Novitates, 677, 1–18.Google Scholar
Ravn, J. P. J. (1926). On a cetacean, Squalodon (Microzeuglodon?) wingei nov. sp., from the Oligocene of Jutland. Meddelelser fra Dansk Geologisk Forening, 7, 45–54.Google Scholar
Ray, C. E. (1975). The relationships of Hemicaulodon effodiens Cope 1869 (Mammalia: Odobenidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 88, 281–304.Google Scholar
Ray, C. E. (1977). Geography of phocid evolution. Systematic Zoology, 25, 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, R. R. and Brownell, R. L. (1989). Susu, Platanista gangetica (Roxburgh, 1801) and Platanista minor Owen, 1853. In Handbook of Marine Mammals, Vol. 4: River Dolphins and the Larger Toothed Whales, ed. Ridgway, S. H. and Harrison, R. J., pp. 69–99. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reeves, R. R. and Tracey, S. (1980). Monodon monoceros. Mammalian Species, 127, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, J. (1862). [on the genus Pseudorca.]Oversigt over det Kgl. Danske videnskabernes selskabs forhandlinger og dets medlemmers arbeider i aaret, 151, 103–52.Google Scholar
Rensberger, J. M. (1969). A new iniid cetacean from the Miocene of California. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences, 82, 1–36.Google Scholar
Rice, D. W. (1998). Marine mammals of the world. Society for Marine Mammalogy Special Publication, 4, 1–231.Google Scholar
Ridgway, S. H. and Harrison, R. J. (1989). Handbook of Marine Mammals, Vol. 4: River Dolphins and the Larger Toothed Whales. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ridgway, S. H., and Harrison, R. J. (1994). Handbook of Marine Mammals, Vol. 5: The First Book of Dolphins. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ridgway, S. H., and Harrison, R. J. (1999). Handbook of Marine Mammals, Vol. 6: The Second Book of Dolphins and the Porpoises. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Robineau, D. (1989). Les types de cetaces actuels du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle. 1. Balaenidae, Balaenopteridae, Kogiidae, Ziphiidae, Iniidae, Pontoporiidae. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 11, 271–89.Google Scholar
Rosel, P. E., Haygood, M. G., and Perrin, W. F. (1995). Phylogenetic relationships among the true porpoises (Cetacea: Phocoenidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 4, 463–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothausen, K. (1968). Die systematisch Stellung der europäischen Squalodontidae (Odontoceti, Mamm.). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 42, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, A. E. (1996). The systematic position of the primitive odontocete Xenorophus sloanii (Mammalia: Cetacea) and two new taxa from the Late Oligocene of South Carolina, USA. [Proceedings of the 6th North American Paleontological Congress.] Paleontological Society Special Publication, 8, p. 338.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1945). The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 85, 1–350.Google Scholar
Slijper, E. J. (1936). Die Cetaceen. Capita Zoologica, 7, 1–590.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. (1804). Extracts from the Minute-Book of the Linnean Society [note on Physeter bidens]. Transactions of the Linnaean Society London, 7, 310.Google Scholar
Stacey, P. J., Leatherwood, S., and Baird, R. W. (1994). Pseudorca crassidens. Mammalian Species, 456, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, B. E. and Stewart, R. E. A. (1989). Delphinapterus leucas. Mammalian Species, 336, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, F. W. (1889). Contributions to the natural history of the cetaceans, a review of the family Delphinidae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 36, 1–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, F. W. (1907a). Remarks on the type of the fossil cetacean Agorophius pygmaeus (Müller). Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 1694, 1–8.Google Scholar
True, F. W. (1907b). Observations on the type specimen of the fossil cetacean Anoplonassa forcipata Cope. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 51, 97–106.Google Scholar
True, F. W. (1908a). On the occurrence of remains of fossil cetaceans of the genus Schizodelphis in the United States, and on Priscodelphinus (?) crassangulum Case. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 50, 449–60.Google Scholar
True, F. W. (1908b). On the classification of the Cetacea. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 47, 385–91.Google Scholar
True, F. W. (1910a). An account of the beaked whales of the Family Ziphiidae in the collection of the United States National Museum, with remarks on some specimens in other American museums. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 73, 1–89.Google Scholar
True, F. W. (1910b). Description of a skull and some vertebrae of the fossil cetacean Diochoticus vanbenedeni from Santa Cruz, Patagonia. Bulletin of American Museum of Natural History, 28, 19–32.Google Scholar
True, F. W. (1912a). Description of a new fossil porpoise of the genus Delphinodon from the Miocene Formation of Maryland. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 15, 165–93.Google Scholar
True, F. W. (1912b). A fossil toothed cetacean from California, representing a new genus and species. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 60, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, F. W. (1913). Diagnosis of a new beaked whale of the genus Mesoplodon from the coast of North Carolina. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 60, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomey, M. (1848). Notice of the discovery of a cranium of the Zeuglodon (Basilosaurus). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 1 2 Series, 16–17.Google Scholar
Turner, J. P. and Worthy, G. A. J. (2003). Skull morphometry of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) from the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Mammalogy, 84, 665–72.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhen, M. D. (2002a). Dental morphology (cetacean), Evolution of. In Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, ed. Perrin, W. F., Würsig, B., and Thewissen, J. G. M., pp. 316–19. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Uhen, M. D. (2002b). Basilosaurids. In Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, ed. Perrin, W. F., Würsig, B., and Thewissen, J. G. M., pp. 78–81. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Uhen, M. D. and Gingerich, P. D. (2001). New genus of dorudontine archaeocete (Cetacea) from the middle-to-late Eocene of South Carolina. Marine Mammal Science, 17, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneden, P. J. (1859). Rapport de M. Van Beneden. Bulletins de l'Académie Royal des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, 8, 123–46.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J.(1876). Les Phoques fossiles du bassin d'Anvers. Journal de Zoologie, 5, 188–205.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. (1877). Note sur un Cachalot main du crag d'Anvers, Physeterula dubussi. Bulletins de l'Académie Royal des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts, 64, 851–6.Google Scholar
Wagler, J. (1830). Natürliches System der Amphibien, mit verangehender Classification der Säugthiere un Vögel. Munich: J. G. Cotta'schen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Whitmore, F. C. Jr. (1994). Neogene climate change and the emergence of the modern whale fauna of the North Atlantic Ocean. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 223–7.Google Scholar
Whitmore, F. C. Jr. and Sanders, A. E. (1977). Review of the Oligocene Cetacea. Systematic Zoology, 25, 304–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, F. C. Jr., Morejohn, V., and Mullins, H. T. (1986). Fossil beaked whales: Mesoplodon longirstrostris dredged from the ocean bottom. National Geographic Research, 2, 47–56.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. E. (1935). Miocene marine mammals from the Bakersfield region, California. Peabody Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 4, 1–143.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. E. (1973). A delphinid (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the Miocene of Palos Verdes Hills, California. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences, 103, 1–33.Google Scholar
Winge, H. (1921). A review of the interrelationships of the Cetacea. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 72, 1–97.Google Scholar
Yang, G., Zhou, K., Ren, W., et al. (2002). Molecular systematics of river dolphins inferred from complete mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequences. Marine Mammal Science, 18, 20–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, K., Qian, W., and Li, Y. (1978). Recent advances in the study of the baiji, Lipotes vexillifer. Journal of the Nanjing Normal College, 1, 8–13.Google Scholar
(1979). The osteology and the systematic position of the baiji, Lipotes vexillifer. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 25, 58–74.
Zhou, K., Zhou, M., and Zhao, Z. (1984). First discovery of a Tertiary platanistoid fossil from Asia. Scientific Reports of the Whales Research Institute, Tokyo, 35, 173–81.Google Scholar
Zioupos, P., Currey, J. D., Casinos, A., and Buffrénil, V. (1997). Mechanical properties of the rostrum of the whale Mesoplodon densirostris, a remarkably dense bony tissue. Journal of Zoology, 241, 725–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×