Adler, M. (2018) Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment? Benefit Sanctions in the UK. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmed, S. (2011) ‘The impact of NGOs on international organizations: complexities and considerations’. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 36, 817–840.Google Scholar

Albiston, C. (1999) ‘The rule of law and the litigation process: the paradox of losing by winning’. Law & Society Review, 33(4), 869–910.Google Scholar

Alesina, A., Favero, C. and Giavazzi, F. (2019) Austerity: When It Works and When It Doesn’t. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Alkema, E. A. (2000) ‘The European Convention as a Constitution and its Court as a constitutional court’, in Mahoney, P., Matscher, F., Petzold, H. and Wildhaber, L. (eds.) Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective: Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal. Cologne: Karl Heymanns Verlag, 41–63.Google Scholar

Alter, K. (2014) The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Andenas, M. and Bjorge, E. (2013) ‘National implementation of ECHR rights’, in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B. and Ulfstein, G. (eds.) Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 181–262.Google Scholar

Angelari, M., Berger, V., Borkowski, G., Culhin, I., Hopma, A., Khurshudyan, A., Kuijer, M., Murdoch, J. and Tibbits, F. (2016) ELP Guidebook on Human Rights Training Methodology for Legal Professionals. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar

Arai-Tahakashi, Y. (2013) ‘The margin of appreciation doctrine: a theoretical analysis of Strasbourg's variable geometry’, in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B. and Ulfstein, G. (eds.) Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 62–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, G. (2012) The Great Investors: Lessons on Investing from Master Traders. London: Pearson.Google Scholar

Arnove, R. F. (1980) Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism: The Foundations at Home and Abroad. New Delhi: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Bambra, C. (2019) Health in Hard Times: Austerity and Health Inequalities. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar

Barzelay, M. (2001) The New Public Management. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bates, E. (2010) The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Berman, E. (1983) The Influence of the Carnegie, Ford and Rockefeller Foundations on American Foreign Policy. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Bertoni, E. A. (2009) ‘The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights: a dialogue on freedom of expression standards’. European Human Rights Law Review, 12(3), 332–352.Google Scholar

Bessy, C., Delpeuch, T. and Pélisse, J. (2011) Droit et regulations des activités économiques: perspectives sociologiques et institutionnalistes. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Biebricher, T. and Vogelmann, F. (2017) The Birth of Austerity: German Ordoliberalism and Contemporary Neoliberalism. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar

Bieling, H.-J. (2014) ‘Shattered expectations: the defeat of European ambitions of global financial reform’. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 346–366.Google Scholar

Blyth, M. (2013) Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bond, M. (2012) The Council of Europe: Structure, History and Issues in European Politics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bouwen, P. and McCown, M. (2007) ‘Lobbying versus litigation: political and legal strategies of interest representation in the European Union’. Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 422–443.Google Scholar

Bremner, R. (1988) American Philanthropy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bringedal Houge, A. and Lohne, K. (2017) ‘End impunity! Reducing conflict-related sexual violence to a problem of law: end impunity!’ Law & Society Review, 51(4), 755–789.Google Scholar

Brown, R. (1979) Rockefeller Medicine Men: Medicine and Capitalism in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bürli, N. (2017) Third-Party Interventions before the European Court of Human Rights: Amicus Curiae, Member-State and Third-Party Interventions. Cambridge: Intersentia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calligaro, O. (2018) ‘Une organisation hybride dans l’arène européenne: Open Society Foundations et la construction du champ de la lutte contre les discriminations’. Politix, 121(1), 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, I. (2013) ‘The Court and the Member States: procedural aspects’, in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B. and Ulfstein, G. (eds.) Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrera, S., de Somer, M. and Petkova, B. (2012) ‘The Court of Justice of the European Union as a fundamental rights tribunal: challenges for the effective delivery of fundamental rights in the area of freedom, security and justice’. CEPS Papers in Liberty and Security in Europe, 49.Google Scholar

Chahim, D. and Prakash, A. (2013) ‘NGOization, foreign funding, and the Nicaraguan civil society’. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25, 487–513.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. (2015) ‘Judicial performance, design and membership at the Court of Justice’, in Bobek, M. (ed.) Selecting Europe’s Judges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–78.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. (2012a) ‘Introduction: the conflicts of EU Law and the conflicts in EU law’. European Law Journal, 18 (5), 607–620.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. (2012b) ‘The European Court of Justice is now little more than a rubber stamp for the EU. It should be replaced with better alternative arrangements for central judicial guidance’. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog, 8 March.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. (2012c) ‘The European Court of Justice has taken on huge new powers as “enforcer” of last week’s Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance. Yet its record as a judicial institution has been little scrutinized’. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog, 7 March.Google Scholar

Chernow, R. (1998) Titan: The Life of John D. Rockefeller. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar

Christoffersen, J. and Madsen, M. R. (2011) The European Court of Human Rights between Laws and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cichowski, R. (2007) The European Court and Civil Society Litigation, Mobilization and Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Choudry, A. and Kapoor, D. (2013) NGOization: Complicity, Contradictions and Prospects. New York, NY: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Chussodovsky, M. (1997) The Globalisation of Poverty: Impacts of IMF and World Bank Reforms. New York, NY: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Cliquennois, G. (2017) ‘The impact of austerity policies on international and European courts and their jurisprudence’. European Journal of International Law Talk blog, www.ejiltalk.org/author/gcliquennois/, 3 March.Google Scholar

Cliquennois, G. and Champetier, B. (2016) ‘The economic, judicial and political influence exerted by private foundations on cases taken by NGOs to the European Court of Human Rights: inklings of a new Cold War?’ European Law Journal, 22 (1), 92–126.Google Scholar

Cliquennois, G. and de Suremain, H. (2018) Monitoring Penal Policy in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cliquennois, G. and Lambert Abdelgawad, E. (2016) ‘The development of the European system of human and fundamental rights in the current economic and political context’. European Law Journal, 22(1), 2–8.Google Scholar

Cliquennois, G. and Snacken, S. (2018) ‘European and United Nations monitoring of penal and prison policies as a source of an inverted panopticon?’ Crime, Law and Social Change, 70(1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Cohen, S. (2011) Soviet Fates and Lost Alternatives: From Stalinism to the New Cold War. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Collins, P. M. (2018) ‘The use of amicus briefs’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14, 219–237.Google Scholar

Conant, L. (2002) Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Condliffe Lagemann, E. (1999) Philanthropic Foundations, New Scholarship, New Possibilities. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Contiades, X. and Fotiadou, X. (2012) ‘Social rights in the age of proportionality: global economic crisis and constitutional litigation’. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10(3), 660–686.Google Scholar

Cordes, J. J. and Steuerle, C. E. (2009) Nonprofits and Business. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar

Cummins, S. and Rhode, D. (2009) ‘Public interest litigation: insights from theory and practice’. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 36, 603–651.Google Scholar

Curti, M. and Nash, R. (1965) Philanthropy in the Shaping of American Higher Education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Daems, T. and Robert, L. (2017) Europe in Prisons: Assessing the Impact of European Institutions on National Prison Systems. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Davies, B. (2019) Austerity, Youth Policy and the Deconstruction of the Youth Service in England. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Búrca, G. (2013) ‘After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: the Court of Justice as a human rights adjudicator?’ Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 20(2), 168–184.Google Scholar

De Búrca, G. and Weiler, J. (2001) The European Court of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De Feyter, K. and Gómez Isa, F. (2005) Privatisation and Human Rights in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Intersentia.Google Scholar

Dehousse, F. (2011) ‘The reform of the EU Courts, the need of a management approach’. Trans-European Policy Studies Association, Egmont Paper 53, http//aei.pitt.edu/33464/Reform-EUCourts.PDF.Google Scholar

Devaux, C. (2019) La fabrique du droit du commerce international. Réguler les risques de capture. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar

De Wolf, A. H. (2011) Reconciling Privatization with Human Rights. Cambridge: Intersentia.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. (1983) ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowie, M. (2002) American Foundations: An Investigative History. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Duffy, H. (2018) Strategic Human Rights Litigation: Understanding and Maximising Impact. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Epp, R. (1998) The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Farrow, T. (2014) Civil Justice, Privatization, and Democracy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Ferguson, K. (2013) Top Down: The Ford Foundation, Black Power, and the Reinvention of Racial Liberalism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Ferguson, K. (2007) ‘Organizing the ghetto: CORE, the Ford Foundation, and American Pluralism, 1967–1969’. Journal of Urban History, 34 (1), 67–100.Google Scholar

Fischer, D. (1983) ‘The role of philanthropic foundations in the reproduction and production of hegemony: Rockefeller foundations and the social sciences’. Sociology, 17(2), 206–233.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A. (2014) Human Rights in Times of Austerity Policy: The EU Institutions and the Conclusion of Memoranda of Understanding. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A., Peters, B. and Ulfstein, G. (2013) Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

France, P. and Vauchez, A. (2017) Sphère publique, intérêts privés. Enquête sur un grand brouillage. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Francis, M. M. (2018) ‘The price of civil rights: black lives, white funding, and movement capture’. Law and Society Review, 53(1), 275–309.Google Scholar

Galanter, M. (1974) ‘Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change’. Law & Society Review, 9, 95–160.Google Scholar

Gedalof, I. (2018) Narratives of Difference in an Age of Austerity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Giblin, B. (2008) ‘Editorial’. Hérodote, 129(2), 3–5.Google Scholar

Glasius, M. (2006) The International Criminal Court: A Global Civil Society Achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Goldston, J. A. (2018) ‘The impacts of strategic human rights litigation: a view from the field’. Presentation given at the International and Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Use of Law by Social Movements and Civil Society, Free University of Brussels, 23 March.Google Scholar

Goldston, J. A. (2017) ‘The unfulfilled promise of educational opportunity in the United States and Europe: from Brown v. Board to D. H. and beyond’, in Bhabha, J., Mirga, A. and Matache, M. (eds.) Realizing Roma Rights. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 163–184.Google Scholar

Goldston, J. A. (2001) ‘A future for Roma rights?’ Presentation given at the Central European University, 8 April.Google Scholar

Goulden, J. (1971) The Money-Givers. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar

Guilhot, N. (2007) ‘Reforming the world: George Soros, global capitalism and the philanthropic management of the social sciences’. Critical Sociology, 33(3), 447–477.Google Scholar

Guilhot, N. (2005) The Democracy Makers: Human Rights and International Order. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Guilhot, N. (2004) ‘George Soros, les sciences sociales et la régulation du marché mondial’. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 151–152(1), 36–48.Google Scholar

Guinchard, A. and Wesley, S. (2016) ‘The French approach to access to justice’, in Palmer, E., Cornford, T., Marique, Y. and Guinchard, A. (eds.) Access to Justice: Beyond the Policies and Politics of Austerity. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 259–287.Google Scholar

Haddad, H. N. (2018) The Hidden Hands of Justice: NGOs, Human Rights, and International Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haines, H. (1984) ‘Black radicalization and the funding of civil rights’. Social Problems, 32, 31–43.Google Scholar

Hausmaninger, H. (1995) ‘Towards a “new” Russian constitutional court’. Cornell International Law Journal, 28, 349–391.Google Scholar

Hellman, J., Jones, G. and Kaufmann, D. (2003) ‘Seize the state, seize the day: state capture and influence in transition economies’. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31, 751–773.Google Scholar

Hershkoff, H. and McCutcheon, A. (2000) ‘Public interest litigation: an international perspective’, in McClymont, M. and Golub, S. (eds.) Many Roads to Justice: The Law-Related Work of Ford Foundation Grantees around The World. New York, NY: The Ford Foundation, 283–296.Google Scholar

Hitoshi Mayer, L. (2011) ‘NGO standing and influence in regional human rights courts and commissions’. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 36, 911–946.Google Scholar

Hodson, L. (2011) NGOs and the Struggle for Human Rights in Europe. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Holcombe, R. G. (2018) Writing Off Ideas: Taxation, Philanthropy and America's Non-Profit Foundations. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Howell, J. and Pearce, J. (2001) Civil Society and Development. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar

Israël, L. (2009) L’arme du droit. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Jacobs, P. (2018) ‘Austerity measures and their effects on penal litigation’. Paper given at the conference on Overcoming the Obstacles to Access of Detained Persons to Rights and to Court: European Perspectives, European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg, 7 December.Google Scholar

Jamieson, M. (2020) The Austerity Cure: The Impact of Benefit Sanctions on Mental Health. Edinburgh: Luna Press Publishing.Google Scholar

Jenkins, C. and Eckert, C. (1986) ‘Channeling Black insurgency: elite patronage and professional social movement organizations in the development of the Black movement’. American Sociological Review, 51, 812–829.Google Scholar

Jordan, B. and Drakeford, M. (2012) Social Work and Social Policy under Austerity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kamat, S. (2002) Development Hegemony. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kapronczay, S. (2017) ‘War on NGOs in Eastern countries: coalition building as a possible answer’. International Journal on Human Rights, 26, available at https://sur.conectas.org/en/war-on-ngos-in-eastern-europe/.Google Scholar

Kelemen, R. D. (2011) Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kilpatrick, C. and de Witte, B. (2014) ‘Social rights in times of crisis in the Eurozone: the role of fundamental rights’ challenges’. European University Institute, Department of Law, EUI Working Paper Law, 2014/05.Google Scholar

Klarman, M. J. (2013) From the Closet to the Altar: Courts, Backlash and the Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kriazhkov, V. and Lazarev, L. (1998) Konstitutsionnaia iustitsiia v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Moscow: BEK.Google Scholar

Krickovic, A. (2015) ‘When interdependence produces conflict: EU–Russia energy relations as security dilemma’. Contemporary Security Policy, 36(1), 3–26.Google Scholar

Krige, J. and Rausch, H. (2012) American Foundations and the Coproduction of World Order in the Twentieth Century. Gottingen/Bristol, CT: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Krug, P. (1997) ‘Departure from the centralized model: the Russian Supreme Court and constitutional control of legislation’. Virginia Journal of International Law, 37(3), 725–778.Google Scholar

Krugman, P. (1999) The Accidental Theorist and Other Dispatches from the Dismal Science. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Lambert Abdelgawad, E. (2017) ‘Measuring the judicial performance of the European Court of Human Rights’. International Journal for Court Administration, 8(2), 20–29.Google Scholar

Lambert Abdelgawad, E. (2016) ‘The economic crisis and the evolution of the system based on the ECHR: is there any correlation?’ European Law Journal, 22(1), 74–91.Google Scholar

Lambert Abdelgawad, E. (2013) ‘The Court as part of the Council of Europe: the Parliamentary Assembly and the Committee of Ministers’, in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B. and Ulfstein, G. (eds.) Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 263–300.Google Scholar

Lambert Abdelgawad, E. (2011) Preventing and Sanctioning Hindrances to the Right of Individual Petition before the European Court of Human Rights. Cambridge: Intersentia.Google Scholar

Landman, T. and Carvalho, E. (2009) Measuring Human Rights. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langbroek, P. M. (2009) Administering Courts and Judges: Rethinking the Tension between Accountability and Independence of the Judiciary. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar

Langbroek, P. M., Dijkstra, R. I., Bozorg Zadeh, K. and Türk, Z. (2017) ‘Performance management of courts and judges: organizational and professional learning versus political accountabilities’, in Contini, F. (ed.) Handle with Care: Assessing and Designing Methods for Evaluation and Development of the Quality of Justice. Bologna: Lappeenranta University of Technology, 297–325.Google Scholar

Leach, P. (2014) ‘EHRAC’s litigation at the European Court of Human Rights’. Intervention at the SAGE workshop, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, 13 February.Google Scholar

Leach, P. (2013) ‘No longer offering fine mantras to a parched child? The European Court’s developing approach to remedies’, in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B. and Ulfstein, G. (eds.) Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 142–180.Google Scholar

Leach, P. (2008) ‘The Chechen conflict: analysing the oversight of the European Court of Human Rights’. European Human Rights Law Review, 6, 732–761; also published in Russian in 2010, Comparative Constitutional Review, 1 (74), 143–168.Google Scholar

Leach, P. (2005a) Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leach, P. (2005b) ‘Beyond the Bug River: a new dawn for redress before the European Court of Human Rights’. European Human Rights Law Review, 148, also published in Russian in 2005, Sravnitelnoe Konstitutsionnoe Obozrenie (Comparative Constitutional Review), 3(52), 94–104, Institute for Law and Public Policy, Moscow.Google Scholar

Leach, P., Hardman, H. and Stephenson, S. (2010a) ‘Can the European Court’s pilot judgment procedure help resolve systemic human rights violations? Burdov and the failure to implement domestic court decisions in Russia’. Human Rights Law Review, 10(2), 346–359.Google Scholar

Leach, P., Paraskev, C. and Uzelac, G. (2010b) ‘Human rights fact-finding: the European Court of Human Rights at a crossroads’. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 28(1), 41–77.Google Scholar

Levine, M. and Forrence, J. (1990) ‘Regulatory capture, public interest, and the public agenda: toward a synthesis’. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6, 167–198.Google Scholar

Lohne, K. (2019) Advocates of Humanity: Human Rights NGOs in International Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lohne, K. (2017) ‘Global civil society, the ICC, and legitimacy in international criminal justice’, in Hayashi, N. and Bailliet, C. M. (eds.) The Legitimacy of International Criminal Tribunals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 449–472.Google Scholar

Margolis, J. and Walsh, J. (2003) ‘Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.Google Scholar

Martinsen, D. and Vollaard, H. (2014) ‘Special issue. Implementing social Europe in times of crises: re-established boundaries of welfare?’ West European Politics, 37(4), 677–692.Google Scholar

Marquez, B. (2003) ‘Mexican–American political organizations and philanthropy: bankrolling a social movement’. Social Service Review, 77, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayerfeld, J. (2011) ‘A Madisonian argument for strengthening international human rights institutions: lessons from Europe’, in Cabrera, L. (ed.) Global Governance, Global Government: Institutional Visions for an Evolving World System. New York, NY: State University of New York Press, 211–251.Google Scholar

Mazon, B. (1985) ‘La Fondation Rockefeller et les sciences sociales en France, 1925–1940’. Revue française de sociologie, 26(2), 311–342.Google Scholar

McAdam, D. (1982) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McCann, M. (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. and Zald, M. (1977) ‘Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory’. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.Google Scholar

McCown, M. (2009) ‘Interest groups and the European Court of Justice’, in Coen, D. and Richardson, J. (ed.) Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, Actors and Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 89–104.Google Scholar

McCrudden, C. (2015) ‘Transnational culture wars’. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(2), 434–462.Google Scholar

McGregor, L. (2015) ‘Alternative dispute resolution and human rights: developing a rights-based approach through the ECHR’. European Journal of International Law, 26(3), 607–634.Google Scholar

McIntosh Sundstrom, L. (2014) ‘Russian NGOs and the European Court of Human Rights: a spectrum of approaches to litigation’. Human Rights Quarterly, 36, 844–868.Google Scholar

Menon, R. and Rumer, E. B. (2015) Conflict in Ukraine: The Unwinding of the Post-Cold War Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mertus, J. (1999) ‘From legal transplants to transformative justice: human rights and the promise of transnational civil society’. American University International Law Review, 14, 1335–1389.Google Scholar

Meyers, S. (2016) ‘NGO-ization and human rights law: the CRPD’s civil society mandate’. Laws, 21(5), available at www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/21.Google Scholar

Morgan, R. and Evans, M. (2002) Combating Torture in Europe: The Work and Standards of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar

Moyn, S. (2014) Human Rights and the Uses of History. New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar

Moyn, S. (2012) The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nazneen, S. and Sultan, M. (2009) ‘Struggling for survival and autonomy: the NGOisation of women’s organizations in Bangladesh’. Development, 52, 193–199.Google Scholar

Nielsen, W. A. (2002) Golden Donors: A New Anatomy of the Great Foundations. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nowak, M. (2017) Human Rights or Global Capitalism: The Limits of Privatization. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

O’Beachain, D. and Polese, A. (2010) The Colour Revolutions in the Former Soviet Republics: Successes and Failures. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, M. and Brady, N. (2013) ‘Investigatory powers of the European Court of Human Rights’. European Human Rights Law Review, 6(4), 378–391.Google Scholar

Palmer, E., Cornford, T., Guinchard, A. and Marique, Y. (2016) Access to Justice: Beyond the Policies and Politics of Austerity. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Parmar, I. (2015) ‘The “Big 3” foundations and American global power’. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 74(4), 676–703.Google Scholar

Parmar, I. (2014) ‘American power and philanthropic warfare: from the war to end all wars to the democratic peace’. Global Society, 28(1), 54–69.Google Scholar

Parmar, I. (2012) Foundations of the American Century. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Parmar, I. (2011) ‘American hegemony, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the rise of academic international relations in the US’, in Guilhot, N. (ed.) The Invention of International Relations Theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 182–209.Google Scholar

Parmar, I., Miller, L. B. and Ledwidge, M. (2014) Obama and the World: New Directions in US Foreign Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pétric, B. (2008) ‘À propos des révolutions de couleur et du soft power américain’. Hérodote, 129(2), 7–20.Google Scholar

Piven, F. F. and Cloward, R. A. (1977) Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Popelier, P., Heyning, C. and Nuffels, P. V. (2011) Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Interaction between the European and the National Courts. Cambridge: Intersentia.Google Scholar

Porter, A. (2015) Buying a Better World: George Soros and Billionaire Philanthropy. Roanoke, VA: TAP Books.Google Scholar

Reckhow, S. (2012) Follow the Money: How Foundation Dollars Change Public School Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rietzler, K. (2014) ‘Fortunes of a profession: American foundations and international law, 1910–1939’. Global Society, 28(1), 8–23.Google Scholar

Roelofs, J. (2003) Foundations and Public Policy: The Mask of Pluralism. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Ron, J., Pandya, A. and Crow, D. (2016) ‘Universal values, foreign money: funding local human rights organizations in the Global South’. Review of International Political Economy, 23(1), 29–64.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, G. (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rushton, P. and Donovan, C. (2019) Austerity Policies: Bad Ideas in Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sadurski, W. (2009) ‘Partnering with Strasbourg: constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the accession of Central and East European states to the Council of Europe, and the idea of pilot judgments’. Human Rights Law Review, 9, 397–453.Google Scholar

Salomon, M. (2015) ‘Of austerity, human rights and international institutions’. European Law Journal, 21(4), 521–545.Google Scholar

Samuel, A. (2004) ‘Arbitration, alternative dispute resolution generally and the European Convention on Human Rights’. Journal of International Arbitration, 21(5), 413–438.Google Scholar

Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. (2006) Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. (2001) Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. (1998) Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scot, M. (2010) ‘“Rockefeller’s Baby”: la London School of Economics et la recherche économique dans l’Angleterre de l’entre-deux-guerres’, in Tournès, L. (ed.) L’argent de l’influence. Les fondations américaines et leurs réseaux européens. Paris: Autrement, 84–104.Google Scholar

Scott-Smith, G. (2014) ‘Maintaining transatlantic community: US public diplomacy, the Ford Foundation, and the successor generation concept in US foreign affairs, 1960s–1980s’. Global Society, 28(1), 90–103.Google Scholar

Scott-Smith, G. (2012) ‘Expanding the diffusion of US jurisprudence: the Netherlands as a ‘beachhead’ for US foundations in the 1960s’, in Krige, J. and Rausch, H. (eds.) American Foundations and the Coproduction of World Order in the Twentieth Century. Gottingen/Bristol, CT: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 210–231.Google Scholar

Sharpe, J. (2010) The Conscience of Europe: 50 years of the European Court of Human Right. London: Third Millennium Publishing.Google Scholar

Shoup, L. H. (2015) Wall Street’s Think Tank: The Council on Foreign Relations and the Empire of Neoliberal Geopolitics, 1976–2014. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Slater, C. (2009) Soros: The World’s Most Influential Investor. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Sokur, S. (2016) Political Problems of International Systems and Global Development. PhD in Political Sciences, National University of Kiev, 29 September.Google Scholar

Soros, G. (2005) Georges Soros on Globalization. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Spano, R. (2014) ‘Universality or diversity of human rights? Strasbourg in the age of subsidiarity’. Human Rights Law Review, 14(3), 487–502.Google Scholar

Stigler, G. (1971) ‘The theory of economic regulation’. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2, 3–21.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. (2002) Globalization and Its Discontents. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Susanu, S. (2016) Costs and Expenses before the European Court of Human Rights through the Lens of Ethics. Master’s thesis, University of Strasbourg.Google Scholar

Teles, S. (2008) The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Torres Pérez, A. (2009) Conflicts of Rights in the European Union: A Theory of Supranational Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tournès, L. (2010) L’argent de l’influence. Les fondations américaines et leurs réseaux européens. Paris: Autrement.Google Scholar

Tulkens, F. (2014) ‘Les prisons en Europe. Les développements récents de la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme’. Déviance et Société, 38(4), 425–448.Google Scholar

Tulkens, F. (2007) ‘The European Convention on Human Rights between international law and constitutional law’, in European Court of Human Rights, Dialogue between Judges. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 8–15.Google Scholar

Tushnet, M. (1987) The NAACP’s Legal Strategy against Segregated Education, 1925–1950. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Vajic, N. (2005) ‘Some concluding remarks on NGOs and the European Court of Human Rights’, in Treves, T., Fodella, A., Tanzi, A. and Frigessi di Rattalma, M. (eds.) Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies. The Hague: Springer, 93–106.Google Scholar

Van den, Eynde L. (2013) ‘An empirical look at the amicus curiae practice of human rights NGOs before the European Court of Human Rights’. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 31(3), 271–313.Google Scholar

Van der Vet, F. (2018) ‘“When they come for you”: legal mobilization in new authoritarian Russia’. Law & Society Review, 52(2), 301–336.Google Scholar

Van Zyl Smit, D. and Snacken, S. (2009) Principles of European Prison Law and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vauchez, A. (2016) Democratizing Europe. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Vauchez, A. and Willemez, L. (2006) La justice face à ses réformateurs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Vettori, G. (2011) ‘Fundamental social rights: a discussion between two crises’. European Journal of Social Law, 1(4), 232–243.Google Scholar

Vincent, M. (2019) ‘The price of civil rights: Black politics, White money, and movement capture’. Law and Society Review, 53(1): 275–309.Google Scholar

Walsh, K., Carney, G. M. and Léime, A. N. (2015) Ageing through Austerity. Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar

Wedel, J. R. (1996) ‘Clique-run organizations and US economic aid: an institutional analysis’. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 4(4), 571–602.Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H. (2016) ‘A Faustian deal?’ International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14(2), 321–324.Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H. (2009) ‘Fundamental rights and fundamental boundaries: common standards and conflicting values in the protection of human rights in the European legal space’, in Kastoryano, R. (ed.) An Identity for Europe: The Relevance of Multiculturalism in EU Construction. The Hague: Springer, 73–101.Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H and Lockhart, N. J. S. (1995) ‘“Taking rights seriously” seriously: the European Court and its fundamental rights jurisprudence – part I’. Common Market Law Review, 32(1), 51–94.Google Scholar

Williamson, A. (1998) How America Built the New Russian Oligarchy, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Willoughby‐Herard, T. (2015) Waste of a White Skin: The Carnegie Corporation and the Racial Logic of White Vulnerability. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Winkler, A. (2018) We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their Civil Rights. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Witt, J. F. (forthcoming) The American Fund: A Story of Money and Politics in America. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Zunz, O. (2012) Philanthropy in America: A History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar