Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:34:03.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

64 - The Impact of Personal Expectations and Biases in Preparing Expert Testimony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Ray Bull
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Susan T. Fiske
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

A considerable number of years ago I began to be asked to provide “expert witness” reports in relation to a number of court cases. Having agreed to do this I not only (and obviously) chose to read all that I could find on how best to do this; I also read information available to lawyers about how they should “deal with” expert witnesses, so as to prepare myself for dealing with lawyers (who can be demanding, sometimes arrogant, people).

Subsequent to the publication in 1992 by the government in England and Wales of the “Memorandum of Good Practice on Video Recorded Interviews with Child Witnesses for Criminal Proceedings” (that I and a law professor were commissioned to draft), I have been asked on numerous occasions to provide an “expert” report on how well (alleged) child victims/witnesses were interviewed (these having been routinely video-recorded since 1992 and often used as evidence-in-chief).

When asked to provide such reports (and indeed on related topics such as the interviewing of suspects, routinely audiotaped in England and Wales since 1986), I have always insisted that I will not discuss with the retaining lawyers (or any other lawyers) the contents of my report until after I have sent the report in writing to them. Once the report is in, I am willing to change some of my wording only for the purposes of clarity, but I am not willing to change my comments/conclusions/advice. The relevant books for lawyers that I had read (and my discussions with some other “expert” psychologists) had forewarned me of some of the ethical issues that might arise if lawyers try to inl uence unduly the content of my “expert” reports (and any of my subsequent testimony).

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Case Studies and Commentaries
, pp. 200 - 201
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×