Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Theme 1 What is environmental biology?
- Theme 2 The scientific method and the unifying theories of modern biology
- Theme 3 Applying scientific method – understanding biodiversity
- Theme 4 Applying scientific method – biodiversity and the environment
- 16 Boom and bust – population ecology
- 17 Living together – communities and ecosystems
- 18 Marine habitats
- 19 Marine lifestyles
- 20 Inland aquatic environments I – wetland diversity and physical and chemical processes
- 21 Inland aquatic environments II – the ecology of lentic and lotic waters
- 22 Terrestrial habitats
- 23 Terrestrial lifestyles
- Theme 5 The future – applying scientific method to conserving biodiversity and restoring degraded environments
- Glossary
- Index
17 - Living together – communities and ecosystems
from Theme 4 - Applying scientific method – biodiversity and the environment
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Theme 1 What is environmental biology?
- Theme 2 The scientific method and the unifying theories of modern biology
- Theme 3 Applying scientific method – understanding biodiversity
- Theme 4 Applying scientific method – biodiversity and the environment
- 16 Boom and bust – population ecology
- 17 Living together – communities and ecosystems
- 18 Marine habitats
- 19 Marine lifestyles
- 20 Inland aquatic environments I – wetland diversity and physical and chemical processes
- 21 Inland aquatic environments II – the ecology of lentic and lotic waters
- 22 Terrestrial habitats
- 23 Terrestrial lifestyles
- Theme 5 The future – applying scientific method to conserving biodiversity and restoring degraded environments
- Glossary
- Index
Summary
Along the dingo fence
During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, frustrated pastoralists in South Australia, New South Wales and Queensland fenced their properties to stop the Australian dingo (Canis lupus) killing their livestock. Eventually links formed between individual fences, creating a continuous barrier now covering over 5000 km. Known variously as the ‘Dingo Fence’, ‘Dingo Barrier Fence’ or ‘Wild Dog Fence’ it is of wire mesh standing 1.8 m high, with a further 30 cm buried. There is a 5 m wide cleared buffer on each side and the entire structure is well maintained. On the New South Wales side of the fence where sheep are the main livestock, dingoes are controlled and numbers are low, whereas on the South Australian side dingoes are tolerated alongside cattle husbandry. Unintentionally, the fence initiated a large-scale experiment, allowing biologists to assess the biological consequences of removing a large predator.
Alan Newsome and his colleagues from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) studied vertebrate abundances on either side of the fence by counting animal tracks at stock watering points. One striking finding was that the introduced predator the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) was present on both sides, but in higher numbers in the absence of dingoes. Dingoes eat foxes and drive them away, explaining the differences in fox numbers across the fence. Foxes threaten several native Australian mammals (see Chapters 2 and 16), including many burrowers and diggers important in soil turnover, nutrient cycling and dispersing plants.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Environmental Biology , pp. 384 - 408Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
- 1
- Cited by