Book contents
- Empirical BioethicsTheoretical and Practical Perspectives
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Empirical Bioethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives
- Part II Practical Perspectives
- 8 Practical Perspectives: An Introduction
- 9 Moral Improvement through Interactive Research: A Practice Example of Dialogical Empirical Bioethics
- 10 Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model: The Case of Ashley X
- 11 Theory and Practice of Democratic Deliberation in Bioethics Research
- 12 Feminist Empirical Bioethics
- 13 Lessons from Experience: Establishing and Running Interdisciplinary Mixed-Method Bioethics Research
- 14 Publishing Research in Empirical Bioethics: Quality, Disciplines and Expertise
- Index
- Books in the series
- References
8 - Practical Perspectives: An Introduction
from Part II - Practical Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 February 2017
Book contents
- Empirical BioethicsTheoretical and Practical Perspectives
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Empirical Bioethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives
- Part II Practical Perspectives
- 8 Practical Perspectives: An Introduction
- 9 Moral Improvement through Interactive Research: A Practice Example of Dialogical Empirical Bioethics
- 10 Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model: The Case of Ashley X
- 11 Theory and Practice of Democratic Deliberation in Bioethics Research
- 12 Feminist Empirical Bioethics
- 13 Lessons from Experience: Establishing and Running Interdisciplinary Mixed-Method Bioethics Research
- 14 Publishing Research in Empirical Bioethics: Quality, Disciplines and Expertise
- Index
- Books in the series
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Empirical BioethicsTheoretical and Practical Perspectives, pp. 125 - 138Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Abma, T., Baur, V., Molewijk, B., Widdershoven, G. 2010. Inter-Ethics: Towards an Interactive and Interdependent Bioethics. Bioethics. 24(5):242–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abma, T., Molewijk, B., Widdershoven, G. 2009. Good Care in Ongoing Dialogues. Responsive Evaluation and Moral Deliberation. Health Care Analysis. 17(3):217–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, R., Ives, J., Dunn, M. 2015. A Systematic Review of Empirical Bioethics Methodologies. BMC Medical Ethics. 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, M., Sheehan, M., Hope, T., Parker, M. 2012. Towards Methodological Innovation in Empirical Ethics in Research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 21(4):466–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, L. 2012. Symbiotic Empirical Ethics: A Practical Methodology. Bioethics. 26(4):198–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutmann, A., Thompson, D. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, J. 2014. A Method of Reflexive Balancing in a Pragmatic, Interdisciplinary and Reflexive Bioethics. Bioethics. 28(6):302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, J., Dunn, M. 2010. Who’s Arguing? A Call for Reflexivity in Bioethics. Bioethics. 24(5):256–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertz, M., Inthorn, J., Renz, G., Rothenberger, L., Salloch, S., Schildman, J., Wohlke, S., Schicktanz, S. 2014. Research across the Disciplines: A Road Map for Quality Criteria in Empirical Ethics Research. BMC Medical Ethics. 15:17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molewijk, B., Stiggelbout, A., Otten, W., Dupuis, H., Kievit, J. 2004. Empirical Data and Moral Theory. A Plea for Integrated Empirical Ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 7(1):55–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Parker, M. 2012. Ethical Problems and Genetics Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voskes, Y., Kemper, M., Landeweer, E.G.M., Widdershoven, G.A.M. 2013. Preventing Seclusion in Psychiatry: A Care Ethics Perspective on the First Five Minutes at Admission. Nursing Ethics. Online First, DOI 10.1177/0969733013493217.Google Scholar
Widdershoven, G. 2001. Dialogue in Evaluation: A Hermeneutic Perspective. Evaluation. 7(2):253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdershoven, G., Abma, T., Molewijk, B. 2009a. Empirical ethics as a dialogical practice. Bioethics. 23:236–248.Google ScholarPubMed
Widdershoven, G., Molewijk, B., Abma, B. 2009b. Improving Care and Ethics: A Plea for Interactive Empirical Ethics. American Journal of Bioethics. 9(6–7):99–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
- 1
- Cited by