Book contents
- Emotions in International Politics
- Emotions in International Politics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Foreword
- Book part
- Introduction
- Part I Towards an Interdisciplinary Analysis of Emotions in International Politics
- Part II Emotions in Foreign Policy Decision Making and in War and Peace
- 9 Assessing the Role of Emotives in International Relations
- 10 The Role of Emotions in Foreign Policy Decision Making
- 11 Shadow of Guilt: U.S.-Rwandese Relations after the 1994 Genocide
- 12 Emotions and Passions of Death, and the Making of World War II: The Cases of Germany and Japan
- 13 From Group Identity to Ethnic Violence
- 14 Exceptionalism, Counterterrorism, and the Emotional Politics of Human Rights
- 15 The Dialectic of Rage
- 16 Transforming Conflict: Trust, Empathy, and Dialogue
- 17 The Role of Emotives in the International Management of Plant Genetic Resources
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
17 - The Role of Emotives in the International Management of Plant Genetic Resources
from Part II - Emotions in Foreign Policy Decision Making and in War and Peace
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
Book contents
- Emotions in International Politics
- Emotions in International Politics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Foreword
- Book part
- Introduction
- Part I Towards an Interdisciplinary Analysis of Emotions in International Politics
- Part II Emotions in Foreign Policy Decision Making and in War and Peace
- 9 Assessing the Role of Emotives in International Relations
- 10 The Role of Emotions in Foreign Policy Decision Making
- 11 Shadow of Guilt: U.S.-Rwandese Relations after the 1994 Genocide
- 12 Emotions and Passions of Death, and the Making of World War II: The Cases of Germany and Japan
- 13 From Group Identity to Ethnic Violence
- 14 Exceptionalism, Counterterrorism, and the Emotional Politics of Human Rights
- 15 The Dialectic of Rage
- 16 Transforming Conflict: Trust, Empathy, and Dialogue
- 17 The Role of Emotives in the International Management of Plant Genetic Resources
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Emotions in International PoliticsBeyond Mainstream International Relations, pp. 380 - 397Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M. and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “The Concept of Legalization”, International Organization 54(3), pp. 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. 2008. Governing Agrobiodiversity: Plant Genetics and Developing Countries (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Ariffin, Y. 2007. “Developmental and Environmental Policies: Past Trends, Present Issues, Future Prospects”, in: Kazancigil, A. and De Senarclens, P. (eds.), Regulating Globalisation. Critical Approaches to Global Governance (New York: United Nations University Press), pp. 205–248.Google Scholar
Barton, J. H. 1982. “The International Breeder’s Rights System and Crop Plant Innovation”, Science 216(4550), pp. 1071–1075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baslar, K. 1998. The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law (The Hague: M. Nijhoff Publishers).Google Scholar
Boy, L. 2008. “L’évolution de la réglementation internationale: vers une remise en cause des semences paysannes ou du privilège de l’agriculteur”, Revue Internationale de Droit Économique 22(3), pp. 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenni, C. (2015), “Where are the Local Communities? Food Sovereignty Discourses on International Agrobiodiversity Conservation Strategies”, in Trauger, A. (ed.), Food Sovereignty in Geographical Context: Discourse, Politics and Practice in Place (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 15–34.Google Scholar
Brush, S. B. 1998. “Bio-Cooperation and the Benefits of Crop Genetic Resources: The Case of Mexican Maize”, World Development 26(5), pp. 755–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, S. B. 2007. “Farmers’ Rights and Protection of Traditional Agricultural Knowledge”, World Development 35(9), pp. 1499–1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conklin, B. 1997. “Body Paint, Feathers, and VCRs: Aesthetics and authenticity in Amazonian Activism”, American Ethnology 24, pp. 711–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. 1895. “The Theory of Emotion: II The Significance of Emotion”, Psychological Review 2(1).Google Scholar
Drahos, P. 2001. “BITs and BIPs”, Journal of World Intellectual Property Law 4(6), pp. 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drahos, P. 2006. “A Defense of the Intellectual Commons”, Consumer Policy Review 16(3), pp. 2–5.Google Scholar
Dumoulin, D. 2003. “Local Knowledge in the Hands of Transnational NGO Networks: A Mexican Viewpoint”, International Social Science Journal 55(178), pp. 593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutfield, G. 2004. Intellectual Property, Biogenetic Resources, and Traditional Knowledge (London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan).Google Scholar
Falcon, W. P. and Fowler, C.. 2002. “Carving Up the Commons – Emergence of a New International Regime for Germplasm Development and Transfer”. Food Policy 27, pp. 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frison, C., López, F. and Esquinas-Alcazar, J. T.. 2011 . Plant Genetic Resources and Food Security (London and New York: Earthscan).Google Scholar
Galushko, V. 2012. “Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Promote Seed Exchange: Evidence from U.S. Seed Exports?”, Agricultural Economics 43, pp. 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstetter, C., et al. 2007. “The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture within the Current Legal Regime Complex on Plant Genetic Resources”, The Journal of World Intellectual Property 10(3/4), pp. 259–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R. O. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hames, R. 2007. “The Ecologically Noble Savage Debate”, Annual Review of Anthropolgy 36, pp.177–190.Google Scholar
May, C. 2000. A Global Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights: The New Enclosures? (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Noss, R. F. 1990. “Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical Approach”, Conservation Biology 4: pp. 355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oguamanam, C. 2008. “Local Knowledge as Trapped Knowledge: Intellectual Property, Culture, Power and Politics”, The Journal of World Intellectual Property 11(1), pp. 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistorius, R. J. 1997. Scientists, Plants and Politics: A History of the Plant Genetic Resoures Movement (Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, IPGRI).Google Scholar
Plucknett, D. L. 1987. Gene Banks and the World’s Food (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, K. and Victor, D.. 2004. “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources”, International Organization 85(2), pp. 277–309.Google Scholar
Roa-Rodriguez, C. and van Dooren, T.. 2008. “Shifting Common Spaces of Plant Genetic Resources in the International Regulation of Property”, The Journal of World Intellectual Property 11(3), pp. 176–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, J., Böschen, S. and Gill, B.. 2011. “Having or Doing Intellectual Property Rights? Transgenic Seed on the Edge between Refeudalisation and Napsterisation”, European Journal of Sociology 52(1), pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, S. and Prakash, A.. 2004. “Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest Between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights”, International Studies Quarterly 48: pp. 143–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. 1937. “The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms”. Mind 46: 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takacs, D. 1996. The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Thomas, Z. 2004. “Common Heritage to Common Concern”, The Journal of World Intellectual Property 8(3), pp. 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S. 2012. “Institutionalized Exclusion: The Political Economy of Benefit Sharing and Intellectual Property” Law, Environment and Development Journal 8(1), pp. 19–41.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. 1996. “Institutional Linkages in International Society: Polar Perspectives”, Global Governance 2, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar