Book contents
- Disrupting Boundaries in Education and Research
- Disrupting Boundaries in Education and Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Prologue
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Materiality and Language Learning in Classrooms
- 3 ‘Poo Theatre’
- 4 Education as Instauration
- 5 Mathematics Learning as an Entanglement of Child, Concept and Technology
- 6 ‘I See You’re a Little Confused’
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 August 2017
Book contents
- Disrupting Boundaries in Education and Research
- Disrupting Boundaries in Education and Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Prologue
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Materiality and Language Learning in Classrooms
- 3 ‘Poo Theatre’
- 4 Education as Instauration
- 5 Mathematics Learning as an Entanglement of Child, Concept and Technology
- 6 ‘I See You’re a Little Confused’
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Disrupting Boundaries in Education and Research , pp. 189 - 200Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Abramson, S. (2006). Documentation communication action: Co-inquiry meetings for facilitated interchange. Co-Inquiry Journal, 1(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Appleton, J. (1982). Pleasure and the perception of habitat: A conceptual framework. In Sadler, Barry & Carlson, Allen (eds.), Environment aesthetics: Essays in interpretation (pp 27–45). University of Victoria: Geography Department.Google Scholar
Attar, D. (2005). Dismay and disappointment: Perspectives of inexperienced adult learners on becoming webpage readers. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(7), 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (2006). Towards a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2011). Erasers and erasures: Pinch’s unfortunate ‘uncertainty principle.’ Social Studies of Science, 41(3), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2012). On touching: The inhuman that therefore I am. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 23(3), 206–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, Y., Bradley, M. D., Hodgson, F., & Lloyd, A. D. (2013). Learning to use new technologies by older adults: Perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1715–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Berg, M., & Seeber, B. K. (2016). The slow professor: Challenging the culture of speed in the academy. Toronto: University of Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrisford, M. D. (2014). Generation green: The making of the UniverCity childcare. Portland, OR: Ecotone Publishing.Google Scholar
Bhatt, I., & de Roock, R. (2013). Capturing the sociomateriality of digital literacy events. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 21281.Google Scholar
Bhatt, I., de Roock, R., & Adams, J. (2015). Diving deep into digital literacy: Emerging methods for research. Language & Education: An International Journal, 29(6), 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6), 645–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2011a). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminism (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2011b). Nomadic theory: The portable Rosi Braidotti. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bursey, E. (2016). Gestures: Giving a helping hand in French language learning. Comprehensive examination paper. Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Châtelet, G. (1993). Les enjeux du mobile. Paris: Seuil. English translation by R. Shore & M. Zagha, Figuring space: Philosophy, mathematics and physics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000.Google Scholar
Clandinin, D. J., Connelly, F. M., & Applebaum, S. D. (1999). Shaping a professional identity: Stories of educational practice. London, Ont.: Althouse Press.Google Scholar
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research in the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Colebrook, C. (2014). Sex after life: Essays on extinction, volume 2. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.12329363.0001.001.Google Scholar
Coles, A., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Re-thinking place value: From metaphor to metonym. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37(1), 3–8.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., & MacKenzie, I. (2011). Bodies of learning. In Guillaume, L. & Hughes, J. (eds.), Deleuze and the body (pp. 53–72). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Dagenais, D. (2003). Accessing imagined communities through multilingualism and immersion education. Language, Identity and Education, 2(4), 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagenais, D., & Day, E. (1999). Home language practices of trilingual children in French Immersion. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagenais, D., Fodor, A., Schulze, E., & Toohey, K. (2013). Charting new directions: The potential of actor–network theory for analyzing children’s videomaking. Language and Literacy, 15(1), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2005). Ethics and politics in early childhood education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2007). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, B. (2014). Reading anger in early childhood intra-actions: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 734–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, B., & Kasama, H. (2004). Gender in Japanese preschools: Frogs and snails and feminist tales in Japan. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
de Freitas, E. (2016). Diffractive apparatus: Rethinking the design experiment in light of quantum ontology. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, April.Google Scholar
de Freitas, E., &. Curinga, M. (2015) New materialist approaches to the study of language and identity: Assembling the posthuman subject. Curriculum Inquiry, 45(3), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2013). New materialist ontologies in mathematics education: The body in/of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 452–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delamont, S. (1992/2002). Fieldwork in educational settings: Methods, pitfalls and perspectives. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1968/1994). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (2004). The logic of sense. Ed. Boundas, C., trans. Lester, M.. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987/2005). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Trans. Massumi, B.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
De Shipper, J. C., Tavecchio, L. W. C., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2008). Children’s attachment relationships with day care providers: Associations with positive caregiving and the child’s temperament. Social Development, 17(3), 454–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C. P., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. E. (eds.) (2012). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, T., & Nerland, M. (2012). Reconceptualizing professional learning: Sociomaterial knowledges, practices, and responsibilities (pp. 52–66). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fjørtoft, I., (2001). The natural environment as a playground for children: The impact of outdoor play activities in pre-primary school children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2),111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980). The history of sexuality. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Fowler, K., Robins, A., Callan, S., & Copp, E. (2009). Fostering identity and relationships. In Papatheodoru, T. & Moyles, J. (eds.), Learning together in the early years: Exploring relational pedagogy (pp. 217–227). London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gane, N. (2006). When we have never been human, what is to be done?: Interview with Donna Haraway. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatt, W., & Ingold, T. (2013). From description to correspondence: Anthropology in real time. In Gunn, W., Otto, T. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Design anthropology: Theory and practice (pp. 139–158). New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2010). Theorizing digital and urban inequalities. Information, Communication & Society, 13(7), 1000–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, M. (1992). What’s wrong with ethnography? Methodological explorations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In Grossberg, L., Nelson, C. & Treichler, P. (eds.), Cultural Studies. (pp. 295–337). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1996). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective (originally published 1988). In Agnew, J., Livingstone, D. & Rogers, A. (eds.), Human geography: An essential anthology (pp. 108–128). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1997). Modest witness@Second Millenium: FemaleMan meets OncoMouse: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (2010). Towards speculative realism: Essays and lectures. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2013). Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 696–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heron, J., & Reason, P. (1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 274–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. M. (2017). More-than-reflective practice: Becoming a diffractive practitioner. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
Howes, C., & Hamilton, C. E. (1992a). Children’s relationships with caregivers: Mothers and child-care teachers. Child Development, 63(4), 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, C., & Hamilton, C. E. (1992b). Children’s relationships with child care teachers: Stability and concordance with parental attachments. Child Development, 63(4), 867–878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, C., & Hamilton, C. E. (1993). The changing experience of child care: Changes in teachers and in teacher–child relationships and children’s social competence with peers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8(1), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2001). From the transmission of representation to the education of attention. In Whitehouse, H. (ed.), The debated mind: Evolutionary psychology versus ethnography (pp. 113–153). New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2014). That’s enough about ethnography! HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackiw, N., & Sinclair, N. (2014). TouchCounts (iPad app). Burnaby, BC: Tangible Mathematics Learning Project.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(4), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, P. T., Bertot, J. C., Thompson, K. M., Katz, S. M., & DeCoster, E. J. (2012). The intersection of public policy and public access: Digital divides, digital literacy, digital inclusion, and public libraries. Public Library Quarterly, 31(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johri, A. (2011). The socio-materiality of learning practices and implications for the field of learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 507–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, V. (2011). Quantum anthropologies: Life at large. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kuby, C. R., & Rucker, T. G. (2016). Go be a writer: Expanding the curricular boundaries of literacy learning with children. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Kuntz, A. (2010). The politics of space in qualitative research. In Savin-Baden, M. & Howell-Major, C. (eds.), New approaches to qualitative research: Wisdom and uncertainty (pp. 145–153). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladkin, D. (2005). ‘The enigma of subjectivity’: How might phenomenology help action researchers negotiate the relationship between ‘self’, ‘other’ and ‘truth’? Action Research, 3(1), 108–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Laptyeva, T. V., Flach, S., & Kladko, K. (2011). The weak-password problem: Chaos, criticality and encrypted p-CAPTCHAs. Europhysics Letters, 95(5), 50007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lather, P. (2000). Drawing the line at angels: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography. In Pierre, E. A. & Willow, W. (eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist post-structural theory and methods in education (pp. 284–312). London: Taylor and Francis,Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor–network theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2006). Reflections on Etienne Souriau’s les différents modes d’existence. Trans. Muecke, S.. In Harman, G., Bryant, L. & Srnicek, N. (eds.), The speculative turn: Continental materialism and realism. Melbourne: re.press,Google Scholar
Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2013). ANT and politics: Working in and on the world. Qualitative Sociology, 36(4), 485–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2006). Reconceptualizing early childhood education: Challenging taken for granted ideas. In Nordic childhoods and early education (pp. 257–287). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2011). Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2012). A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analyzing interview data. Feminist Theory, 13(3), 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (1997). Construct validity in SLA research: A response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 318–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Lunney Borden, L. (2011). The ‘verbification’ of mathematics: Using the grammatical structures of Mi’kmaq to support student learning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(3), 8–13.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. (2007). Toward formative assessment: The use of pedagogical documentation in early elementary classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22(2), 232–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M., & Sánchez, A. (2010). Provoking dialogue: Promote a deeper understanding of teaching and learning through images and documents. Canadian Children, 35(2), 25–30.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M., Hill, C., Donovan, L., Howarth, P., & Irvine, M. (2013). Actualizing co-inquiry: Theory and practice. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Victoria, B.C., June 1–5.Google Scholar
MacLure, M. (2013a). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M., & Sánchez, A. (2013b). The wonder of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 228–232.Google Scholar
Madigan, R., Johnson, S., & Linton, P. (1995). The language of psychology: APA style as epistemology. American Psychologist, 50(6), 428–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaguzzi, L. (1994). Your image of the child: Where teaching begins. Early Childhood Educational Exchange, No. 96, 52–61.Google Scholar
Martin, A. D., & Kamberelis, G. (2013). Mapping not tracing: Qualitative educational research with political teeth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 668–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzei, L. (2014). Beyond an easy sense: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 742–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meillassoux, Q. (2008). After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. Trans. Brassier, Ray. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervyn, K., Simon, A., & Allen, D. K. (2014). Digital inclusion and social inclusion: A tale of two cities. Information, Communication & Society, 17(9), 1086–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, S. (1981). ‘Sharing time’: Children’s narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 10(3), 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, C. A., Veenhof, B., Leith, J., & Statistics Canada. (2010). Intensity of internet use in Canada: Understanding different types of users. Ottawa, Ont.: Statistics Canada, Business Special Surveys and Technology Statistics Division.Google Scholar
Miller, K. (2016). Pedagogy and place: What can a place responsive approach contribute to pedagogical practice in higher education? In Proceedings of the Standing Committee on University Teaching and Research in the Education of Adults (SCUTREA). Leicester, UK, July 5–7.Google Scholar
Morgan, B. (1997). Identity and intonation: Linking dynamic processes in an ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Franko, W. (2012). Digital cities: The Internet and the geography of opportunity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulcahy, D. (2012). Rethinking teacher learning: A more than representational account. In Fenwick, T. & Nerland, M. (eds.), Reconceptualising professional learning: Sociomaterial knowledges, practices and responsibilities (pp. 52–66). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow, UK: Longman/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change (2nd ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Noske, C. (2015). Towards an existential pluralism: The philosophy of Etienne Souriau. Cultural Studies Review, 21(1), 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (October 2015). The innovation imperative: Contributing to productivity, growth and well-being. Paris: Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Note.Google Scholar
Peters, S. (2009). Responsive, reciprocal relationships. The heart of the the whariki curriculum. In Papatheodoru, T. & Moyles, J. (eds.), Learning together in the early years: Exploring relational pedagogy (pp. 23–32). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Philips, S. U. (1992). The invisible culture: Communication in community and classroom on the Warm Spring Indian Reservation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Pimm, D. (2006). Drawing on the image in mathematics and art. In Sinclair, N., Pimm, D. & Higginson, W. (eds.), Mathematics and the aesthetic: New approaches to an ancient affinity (pp. 160–189). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Porteous, J. D. (1977). Environment and behaviour: Planning in everyday urban life. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Radford, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. Trans. and ed. Corcoran, S.. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Reason, P. (2002). The practice of cooperative inquiry. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 15(3), 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridewood, L. (2016). Student-engaged assessment in the elementary classroom. Comprehensive Examination paper. Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, C. (2001). Documentation and assessment: What is the relationship? In Giudici, C., Rinaldi, C. & Krechevsky, M. (eds.), Making learning visible: Children as individual and group learners (pp. 78–90). Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Robinson, L., Cotten, S., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., … Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roder, J. (2011). Beyond technicism: Towards ‘being’ and ‘knowing’ in an intra-active pedagogy. He Kupu, 2(5), 61–72.Google Scholar
Rotman, B. (2008a). Becoming beside ourselves: The alphabet, ghosts, and distributed human beings. Durham, NC: Duke University PressGoogle Scholar
Rotman, B. (2008b). 2008 virtual X and ghost effects. Presented at the meeting Recoded: Landscapes and Politics of New Media, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK. Retrieved from http://brianrotman.wordpress.com/files-alpha/virtual-x-and-ghost-effects.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. (1986). Course in general linguistics (3rd ed.). Trans. Harris, R. (pp. 9–10). Chicago: Open Court (originally published 1972).Google Scholar
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Serres, M. (2011). Variations on the body. Trans. Burks, Randolph. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Shanker, S. (2013). Calm, alert and learning: Classroom strategies for self-regulation. Toronto: Pearson.Google Scholar
Shankar, S., & Cavanaugh, G. (2012). Language and materiality in global capitalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(3), pp. 335–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaviro, Steve. (1997). Doom patrols: A theoretical fiction about postmodernism. New York: Serpent’s Tail.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2009). Animation: The fundamental, essential, and properly descriptive concept. Continental Philosophy Review, 42, 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, N., & Coles, A. (2016). Returning to ordinality in early number sense: Neurological, technological and pedagogical considerations. In Faggione, E., Ferrara, F. & Montone, A. (eds.), Innovation and Technology enhancing mathematics education. Springer.Google Scholar
Sinclair, N., & de Freitas, E. (2014). The haptic nature of gesture: Rethinking gesture with new multitouch digital technologies. Gesture, 14(3), 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, N., & Higginson, W. (eds.) (2007). Mathematics and the aesthetic: New approaches to an ancient affinity (pp. 160–189). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, N., & Pimm, D. (2015). Whatever be their number: Counting on the visible, the audible, and the tangible. In Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Mavrou, K. & Paparistodemou, E. (eds.), Integrating touch-enabled and mobile devices into contemporary mathematics education (pp. 50–80). IGI Global.Google Scholar
Smythe, S. & Breshears, S. (2016). Complicating access: Digital inequality and adult learning in a public access computing space. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 28(2), 67–81.Google Scholar
Smythe, S., & Neufeld, P. (2010). Podcast time: Negotiating digital literacies and communities of learning in a middle years ELL classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 6, 488–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smythe, S., Toohey, K., & Dagenais, D. (2014). Video making, production pedagogies and educational policy. Journal of Educational Policy, 1–32.Google Scholar
Sobel, D. (1990). A place in the world: Adults’ memories of childhood’s special places. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 7(4), 5–12.Google Scholar
SolveMedia. (September 23, 2016). What is CAPTCHA? Retrieved from http://solvemedia.com/security/captcha.Google Scholar
Souriau, E. (2009/2015). The different modes of existence. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.Google Scholar
Souriau, E. (2015). Les différents modes d’existence. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., & Kind, S. W. (2005). A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 897–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staats, S. (2008). Poetic lines in mathematics discourse: A method from linguistic anthropology. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(2), 26–32.Google Scholar
St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Pierre, E. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (eds.) (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. (Special issue.) Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Pierre, E., & Pillow, W. (eds.) (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist post-structural theory and methods in education. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (eds.) (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strozzi, P. (2001). Daily life at school: Seeing the extraordinary in the ordinary. In Giudici, C., Rinaldi, C. & Krechevsky, M. (eds.), Making learning visible: Children as individual and group learners (pp. 58–77). Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. F., & Kuo, F. E. (2006). Is contact with nature important for healthy child development? State of the evidence (pp. 124–140). In Spencer, C. B. & Blades, M. (eds.), Children and their environments: Learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. (1997). Many families, many literacies: An international declaration of principles. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Trade.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. M., Jaeger, P. T., Taylor, N. G., Subramaniam, M., & Bertot, J. C. (2014). The policy gap. Library Journal, 139(14), 36–36.Google Scholar
Toohey, K. (1996). Learning English as a second language in kindergarten: A community of practice perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52(4), 549–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toohey, K. (1998). ‘Breaking them up, taking them away’: Constructing ESL students in grade one. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English at school: Identity, social relations and classroom practice. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Toohey, K. (2017). Review of C. R. Kuby & T. Gutshall Rucker: Go be a writer! Expanding the boundaries of literacy learning with children. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 263–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toohey, K., & Dagenais, D. (2015). Videomaking as sociomaterial assemblage. Language and Education, 29(4), 302–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toohey, K., Dagenais, D., & Schulze, E. (2012). Second language learners making video in three contexts. Language and Literacy, 14(2), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toohey, K, Dagenais, D., Fodor, A., Hof, L., Nuñez, O., Schulze, E., & Singh, A. (2015). ‘That sounds so coool!’: Entanglements of children, digital tools and literacy practice. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 461–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlick, S. (2016, April 28). Uhlick pottery throwing. (Video.) Retrieved from www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQE_w16KdeM.Google Scholar
Voss, D. (2013). Conditions of thought: Deleuze and transcendental ideas. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Weedon, C. (1996). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1920). The concept of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; reissued Mineola, NY: Dover, 2004.Google Scholar