Abraham, Katharine G. and Mackie, Christopher, eds. 2005. Beyond the Market: Designing Nonmarket Accounts for the United States. Report of the Panel to Study the Design of Nonmarket Accounts, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences & Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Abrahamson, Peter. 1999. The Scandinavian model of welfare. Vol. IV, pp. 15–30 in Comparing Social Welfare Systems in Nordic Europe and France, ed. Bouget, Denis and Palier, Bruno. Paris: MIRE-DREES.Google Scholar

Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I. and Alloy, L. B.. 1989. Hopelessness depression: a theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review 96: 358–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adam, Barbara. 2004. Time. Cambridge: Polity.Google ScholarPubMed

Adam Smith Institute. 2005. About Tax Freedom Day. Available at www.adamsmith.org/tax/Tax%20Freedom%20Day/About%20TFD.html.

Adams, Charles. 2000. Slavery reexamined. Available at: www.fff.org/freedom/0100g.asp (Part I) and www.fff.org/freedom/0200e.asp (Part II).

Alessina, Alberto, Edward Glaeser and Bruce Sacerdote. 2005. Work and leisure in the US and Europe: why so different? NBER Working Paper No. 11278. Boston: NBER. Available at: www.nber.org/papers/w11278.

Ambler, John S., ed. 1991. The French Welfare State. New York University Press.Google Scholar

Andorka, Rudolf. 1987. Time budgets and their uses. Annual Review of Sociology 13: 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anonymous. n.d. France 1994: survey information. Available at: www.lisproject.org/techdoc/fr/fr94survey.pdf.

Arneson, Richard J. 1989. Equality and equality of opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies 56: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arneson, Richard J. 1997. Egalitarianism and the undeserving poor. Journal of Political Philosophy 5: 327–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ås, Dagfinn. 1978. Studies of time use: problems and prospects. Acta Sociologica 15: 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ås, Dagfinn1982. Designs for large scale, time use studies of the 24-hour day. Pp. 17–53 in It's About Time: Proceedings of the International Research Group on Time Budgets and Social Activities, ed. Staikov, Z. Sofia: Institute of Sociology at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Bulgarian Sociological Association.Google Scholar

Ashford, Douglas E. 1991. Advantages of complexity: social insurance in France. In Ambler 1991, pp. 32–57.

Atkinson, A. B. 1987. On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica 55: 749–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, A. B. 1995. Incomes and the Welfare State. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Atkinson, A. B. 1998. Poverty in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Atkinson, A. B., Rainwater, L. and Smeeding, T. M.. 1995. Income Distribution in OECD Countries: The Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), Social Policy Studies 18. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 1993. Time Use Survey, Australia, 1992: User's Guide. ABS catalogue No. 4150.0. Canberra: ABS.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)1994. How Australians Use Their Time. Revised edn. Catalogue No. 4153.0. Canberra: ABS.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).1996. In Tune: Time Use News & Events 1 (June). Available at: www.stmarys.ca/partners/iatur/choi7103.htm.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)1998a. How Australians Use Their Time, 1997. Rev. edn. Catalogue No. 4153. Canberra: ABS.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)1998b. Time Use Survey, Australia: User's Guide, 1997. Catalogue No. 4150. Canberra: ABS.

Baldwin, Peter. 1990. The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State 1875–1975. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bane, Mary Jo. 1988. Politics and policies of the feminization of poverty. In Weir et al. 1988, pp. 381–96.

Barr, Nicholas. 2001. The Welfare State as Piggy Bank. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, Garry F. 2001. The dynamics of participating in Parenting Payment (Single) and the Sole Parent Pension. Policy Research Paper Number 14. Canberra: Department of Family & Community Services, Commonwealth of Australia.

Barry, Brian. 1989. Chance, choice and justice. Pp. 142–58 in Liberty and Justice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baxter, Janeen and Gibson, Diane. 1990. Double Take: The Links Between Paid and Unpaid Work. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar

Becker, Gary S. 1965. A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal 75: 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, Gary S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Becker, Gary S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Beckerman, Wilfred. 1978. Measures of Leisure, Equality and Welfare. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar

Bell, Linda and Freeman, Richard. 2001. The incentive for working hard: explaining hours worked differences in the US and Germany. Labour Economics 8: 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergman, Solveig. 2004. Collective organizing and claim making on child care in Norden: blurring the boundaries between inside and outside. Social Politics 11: 217–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. 1958. Two concepts of liberty. Pp. 118–72 in Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Besharov, Douglas J., Jeffrey S. Morrow and Anne Fergyan Shi. 2006. Childcare data in the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP): inaccuracies and corrections. Mimeo., Welfare Reform Academy, University of Maryland. Available at: www.welfareacademy.org/pubs/sipp_childcare_data.pdf.

Beveridge, William H. 1942. Social Insurance and Allied Services. Cmnd. 6404. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Suzanne M., Robinson, John P. and Milkie, Melissa A.. 2006. Changing Rhythms of American Family Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Bittman, Michael. 1992. Juggling Time: How Australian Families Use Time. 2nd edn. Canberra: Office of the Status of Women.Google Scholar

Bittman, Michael 1999a. Parenthood without penalty: time use and public policy in Australia and Finland. Feminist Economics 5 (3: Nov.): 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bittman, Michael1999b. Social participation and family welfare: the money and time cost of leisure. SPRC Discussion Papers No. 95 (Feb. 1999). Kensington, NSW: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.

Bittman, Michael, England, Paula, Sayer, Liana, Folbre, Nancy and Matheson, George. 2002. When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology 109 (1: July): 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bittman, Michael and Pixley, Jocelyn. 1997. The Double Life of the Family. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Bittman, Michael and Rice, James Mahmud. 2002. The spectre of overwork: an analysis of trends between 1974 and 1997 using Australian time-use diaries. Labour and Industry 12: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bittman, Michael and Wajcman, Judy. 2000. The rush hour: the character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces 79 (1: Sept.): 165–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjørnskov, Christian. 2003. The happy few: cross-country evidence on social capital and life satisfaction. Kyklos 56: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blake, William. 1804. Jerusalem. Pp. 635–847 in The Complete Poems of William Blake, ed. Ostriker, Alicia. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.Google Scholar

Blanchflower, David and Andrew Oswald. 2006. Happiness and the Human Development Index: the paradox of Australia. National Bureau of Economics Working Paper No. 11416. Available at: www.nber.org/papers/w11416.

Blaug, Marc. 1963. The myth of the old poor law and the making of the new. Journal of Economic History 23: 151–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blomfield, L. et al. 1834. Report from His Majesty's Commission for Enquiring into the Administration and Practical Operation of the Poor Law. London: HMSO. Reprinted in part as The Poor Law Report of 1834, ed. , S. G. and Checkland, E. O. A. (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1974).Google Scholar

Böheim, René and Taylor, Mark P.. 2004. Actual and preferred working hours. British Journal of Industrial Relations 42: 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boulin, Jean-Yves and Ulrich Mückenberger. 1999. Times in the city and quality of life. Best: European studies on time. European Foundation. Available at: www.fr.eurofound.eu.int/publications/files/EF9940EN.pdf.

Bowles, Samuel and Park, Yongjin. 2005. Emulation, inequality and work hours: was Thorsten Veblen right? Economic Journal 115 (Nov.): F397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradshaw, Jonathan, Ditch, John, Holmes, Hilary and Whiteford, Peter. 1993. Support for Children: A Comparison of Arrangements in Fifteen Countries. Department of Social Security Research Report No. 21. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Braybrooke, David. 1987. Meeting Needs. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, Daniel W. 1995. Justice and the ADA: does prioritizing and rationing health care discriminate against the disabled? Social Philosophy & Policy 12: 159–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bryson, Lois, Michael Bittman and Sue Donath. 1994. Men's welfare state, women's welfare state: tendencies to convergence in practice and theory? In Sainsbury 1994, pp. 118–31.

Burger, Jerry 1989. Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (2): 246–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Eamonn. 2005. Tax Freedom Day points up Europe's problems. Available at: www.adamsmith.org/cissues/tax-and-economy/wsj-tax.htm.

Calmfors, Lars and Skedinger, Per. 1995. Does active labour-market policy increase employment? Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence from Sweden. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 11 (1: Spring): 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E. and Rogers, Willard L.. 1976. The Quality of American Life. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Carney, Terry and Hanks, Peter. 1994. Social Security in Australia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Castles, Francis G. 1985. The Working Class and the Welfare State: Reflections on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand, 1890–1980. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Castles, Francis G.ed. 1993. Families of Nations. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar

Castles, Francis G.1996. Needs-based strategies of social protection in Australia and New Zealand. Pp. 88–115 in Welfare States in Transition, ed. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. London: Sage for the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar

Castles, Francis G.ed. 1998. Comparative Public Policy: Patterns of Post-war Transformation. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar

Castles, Francis G. 2001. A farewell to Australia's welfare state. International Journal of Health Services 31: 537–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Castles, Francis G. and Michael Flood. 1993. Why divorce rates differ: law, religious belief and modernity. In Castles 1993, pp. 293–326.

Castles, Francis G. and Mitchell, Deborah. 1992. Identifying welfare state regimes: the links between politics, instruments and outcomes. Governance 5: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambaz, Christine and Claude Martin. 2001. Lone parents, employment and social policy in France: lessons from a family-friendly policy. Pp. 129–50 in Lone Parent, Employment and Social Policy: Cross-national Comparisons, ed. Millar, Jane and Rowlingson, Karen. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Citro, Constance F. and Michael, Robert T.. 1995. Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Colin. 1958. The economics of housework. Bulletin of the Oxford Institute of Statistics 20: 205–11.Google Scholar

Clarkberg, Marin and Moen, Phyllis. 2001. The time-squeeze: is the increase in working time due to employer demands or employee preferences? American Behavioral Scientist 44: 1115–35.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. 1983. The structure of proletarian unfreedom. Philosophy & Public Affairs 12: 3–33.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99: 906–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, M. T. and Pencavel, J.. 1993a. Changes in work hours of male employees 1945–1988. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46: 262–81.Google Scholar

Coleman, M. T. and Pencavel, J. 1993b. Trends in market work behavior of women since 1940. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46: 653–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daprè, Bob. 2006. A Compendium of Legislative Changes in Social Security 1983–2000: Part 1, 1983–1993. Occasional Paper No. 13. Canberra: Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. 2006. The value of autonomy and autonomy of the will. Ethics 116: 263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deaton, Angus. 1997. The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconomic Approach to Development Policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press for the World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deeming, Christopher. 2005. Minimum income standards: how might budget standards be set for the UK? Journal of Social Policy 34: 619–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeLay, Tom. 1998. The Reagan legacy lives on. Special Order Speech before the US House of Representatives, Washington, DC, on 3 February, 1998. Available at: nlc.natca.org/archive/delay.htm.

Swaan, Abram. 1988. In Care of the State. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Dickens, Charles. 1854. Hard Times. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1969.Google Scholar

Diener, Ed. 1984. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin 95 (3): 542–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diener, Ed, Gohm, Carol L., Shu, Eunkook M. and Oishi, Shigehiro. 2000. Similiarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology 31: 419–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diener, Ed, Shu, Eunkook M., Lucas, Richard E. and Smith, Heidi L.. 1999. Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin 125: 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donovan, Nick and Halpern, David. 2002. Life Satisfaction. London: Cabinet Office Strategy Unit. Available at: www.wcfia.harvard.edu/conferences/socialcapital/papers.asp.Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary and Isherwood, Brian. 1979. The World of Goods. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Dow, Greg K. and F. Thomas Juster. 1985. Goods, time and well-being: the joint dependence problem. In Juster and Stafford 1985b, pp. 397–414.

Doyal, Len and Gough, Ian. 1991. A Theory of Human Need. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dubay, Curtis S., Sumeet Sagoo and Scott A. Hodge. 2005. America celebrates Tax Freedom Day®. Special Report No. 134 (April). Available at: www.taxfoundation.org/taxfreedomday.

Duncan-Myers, Audrey and Huebner, Ruth. 2000. Relationship between choice and quality of life among residents in long-term-care facilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 54 (5): 504–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dusenberry, James. 1949. Income, Savings and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Gerald. 1982. Is more choice better than less? Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7: 47–61. Reprinted pp. 62–84 in Dworkin 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Gerald 1988. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald M. 1978. Liberalism. Pp. 113–43 in Public and Private Morality, ed. Hampshire, Stuart. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald M. 1981. What is equality? Philosophy & Public Affairs 10: 185–246, 283–345.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald M. 2000. The Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Easterlin, Richard. 2001. Income and happiness: towards a unified theory. Economic Journal 111: 465–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Meredith. 2001. From child maintenance to child support: an unlikely policy. Pp. 57–96 in Social Policy, Public Policy: From Problem to Practice. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Eekelaar, John. 1991. Regulating Divorce. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ehrenreich, Barbara. 2002. Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America. New York: Owl Books, Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Hester. 1984. Contemporary Feminist Thought. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Eisner, Robert. 1988. Extended accounts for national income and product. Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1611–84.Google Scholar

Ekirch, A. Roger. 2001. Sleep we have lost: pre-industrial slumber in the British Isles. American Historical Review 106 (2: April): 343–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ekirch, A. Roger 2005. At Day's Close: Night in Times Past. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Engels, Friedrich. 1844. The Condition of the Working Class in England, ed. and trans. Henderson, W. O. and Chaloner, W. H.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958.Google Scholar

England, Paula and Folbre, Nancy. 1999. The cost of caring. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 561 (1): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs and Kallenberg, Arne L., eds. 2004. Fighting for Time: Shifting Boundaries of Work and Social Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert. 1993. Descriptions of inequality: the Swedish approach to welfare research. Pp. 67–83 in The Quality of Life, ed. Nussbaum, Martha and Sen, Amartya. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Robert and Åberg, Rune. 1987. The nature and distribution of welfare. Pp. 1–13 in Erikson and Åberg, Welfare in Transition: A Survey of Living Conditions in Sweden 1968–1981. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Eriksson, Lina and Goodin, Robert E.. 2007. The measuring rod of time: the example of Swedish day-fines. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24: 125–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eriksson, Lina, Rice, James Mahmud and Goodin, Robert E.. 2007. Temporal aspects of life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research 80: 511–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta 1999. Social Foundations of Post Industrial Economies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta 2002. Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta and Walter Korpi. 1984. Social policy as class politics in post-war capitalism: Scandinavia, Austria and Germany. In Goldthorpe 1984, pp. 179–208.

Etzioni, Amitai. 1993. The Spirit of Community. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

European Commission (EC), Social Protection Committee. 2001. Report on Indicators in the Field of Poverty and Social Exclusion. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_inclusion/indicators_en.htm.

Eurostat, . 2000a. Guidelines on Harmonized European Time Use Surveys. Luxembourg: Eurostat. Available at: www.scp.nl/onderzoek/tbo/achtergronden/guidelines.pdf.Google Scholar

Eurostat, 2000b. Survey on Time Use: Activity Coding List. Final draft, replacing Guidelines on Harmonized European Time Use Surveys. Doc E2/TUS/5/00. Luxembourg: Eurostat. Available at: unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/timeuse/tusresource_manuals/ eurostat_man.pdf.Google Scholar

Feinberg, Joel. 1980. The idea of a free man. Pp. 3–29 in Feinberg, Rights, Justice and the Bounds of Liberty. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Figart, D. and Golden, L.. 1998. The social economics of work time: an introduction. Review of Social Economy 56: 411–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fineman, Martha Albertson. 1991. The Illusion of Equality: The Rhetoric and Reality of Divorce Reform. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, Irving. 1928. The Money Illusion. New York: Adelphi.Google Scholar

Folbre, Nancy. 1982. Exploitation comes home: a critique of the Marxian theory of family labor. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6: 317–29.Google Scholar

Folbre, Nancy 1991. The unproductive housewife: her evolution in nineteenth century economic thought. Signs 16: 463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Folbre, Nancy 1994. Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Folbre, Nancy 2001. The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. New York: New Press.Google Scholar

Folbre, Nancy 2006. Greed and Lust: A History of Economic Ideas.Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Forthcoming from Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Folbre, Nancy 2008. Valuing Children: Rethinking the Economics of the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Forssén, Katja. 1997. Gender equality and welfare states models: outcomes perspective. Series B:14/1997. Turku, Finland: Department of Social Policy, University of Turku.

Forssén, Katja 1998. Children, Families and the Welfare State: Studies on the Outcomes of Finnish Family Policy. STAKES Research Report 92. Helsinki: STAKES National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health.Google Scholar

Forssén, Katja and Hakovirta, Mia. 1998. Work incentives in single parent families. Series B:15/1998. Turku, Finland: Department of Social Policy, University of Turku.

Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan. Harmondsworth: Penguin; originally published 1975.Google Scholar

Frank, Robert H. 1985. Choosing the Right Pond. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. 1994. After the family wage: gender equity and the welfare state. Political Theory 22: 591–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, Nancy and Gordon, Linda. 1992. Contract versus charity: why is there no social citizenship in the United States?Socialist Review 22 (3): 45–68.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy and Gordon, Linda 1994. A genealogy of dependency: tracing a keyword of the US welfare state. Signs 19: 309–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, Bruno S. and Stutzer, Alois. 2002a. Happiness & Economics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Frey, Bruno S. and Stutzer, Alois 2002b. What can economists learn from happiness research?Journal of Economic Literature 40 (2: June): 402–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton and Friedman, Rose. 1980. Free to Choose. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Fromm, Erich. 1941. Escape from Freedom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Galston, William A. 1991. Liberal Purposes. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garfinkel, Irving and Haveman, Robert H.. 1977. Earnings capacity, economic status and poverty. Journal of Human Resources 12: 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garfinkel, Irving and Haveman, Robert H. 1978. Earnings Capacity, Poverty and Inequality. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Irwin, Hochschild, Jennifer L. and McLanahan, Sara S., eds. 1996. Social Policies for Children. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Gauthier, Anne. 1996. The State and the Family: A Comparative Analysis of Family Policies in Industrialized Countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Germany. 1949. Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany of 23 May 1949. Pp. 127–207 in Comparing Constitutions, ed. Finer, S. E., Bogdanor, Vernon and Rudden, Bernard. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gershuny, Jonathan. 1992. Are we running out of time?Futures 24 (1: Jan./Feb.): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gershuny, Jonathan 2000. Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Post-Industrial Society. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gershuny, Jonathan 2005a. Business as the badge of honor for the new superordinate working class. Social Research 72: 287–314.Google Scholar

Gershuny, Jonathan 2005b. Time Allocation and the Comprehensive Accounting of Economic Activity. ISER Working Paper No. 2005–8. Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar

Gershuny, Jonathan and Robinson, John P.. 1988. Historical changes in the household division of labor. Demography 25: 537–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gershuny, Jonathan and Sullivan, Oriel. 1998. The sociological uses of time-use diary analysis. European Sociological Review 14: 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gershuny, Jonathan and Sullivan, Oriel 2003. Time use, gender, and public policy regimes. Social Politics 10: 205–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Glass, D. V. 1940. Population Policies and Movements in Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt-Clermont, Luisella. 1993. Monetary valuation of non-market productive time – methodological considerations. Review of Income and Wealth 39: 419–33. Available at: www.roiw.org/1993/419.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldschmidt-Clermont, Luisella and Pagnossin-Aligisakis, Elisabetta. 1995. Measures of Unrecorded Economic Activities in Fourteen Countries. Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper No. 20. New York: United Nations Development Programme. Available at: hdr.undp.org/docs/publications/ ocational_papers/oc20a.htm.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt-Clermont, Luisella and Pagnossin-Aligisakis, Elisabetta 1999. Households' non-SNA production: labour time, value of labour and of product, and contribution to extended private consumption. Review of Income and Wealth 45: 519–29. Available at: www.roiw.org/1999/519.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldschneider, Frances K. and Waite, Linda J.. 1991. New Families, No Families?Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Goldthorpe, John H., ed. 1984. Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. 1982. Political Theory & Public Policy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. 1985. Protecting the Vulnerable. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. 1988. Reasons for Welfare. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E1990a. Relative needs. Pp. 12–33 in Needs and Welfare, ed. Ware, Alan and Goodin, Robert E.. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. 1990b. Stabilizing expectations: the role of earnings-related benefits in social welfare policy. Ethics 100: 530–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. 1995. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E1998. Social welfare as a collective social responsibility. Pp. 97–194 in Social Welfare and Individual Responsibility, by Schmidtz, David and Goodin, Robert E.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. 2001. Toward a post-productivist welfare state. British Journal of Political Science 31: 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. 2002. Structures of mutual obligation. Journal of Social Policy 31: 579–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. 2004. Support with strings: workfare as an ‘impermissible condition’. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21: 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E2005. Responsibilities for children's well-being. Pp. 60–88 in No Time to Lose: The Wellbeing of Australia's Children, ed. Prior, Margot and Richardson, Sue. Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E2008. Women's work: its irreplaceability and exploitability. In The Illusion of Consent: Essays after Carole Pateman, ed. O'Neill, Daniel, Shanley, Mary Lyndon and Young, Iris Marion. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E., Headey, Bruce, Muffels, Ruud and Dirven, Henk-Jan. 1999. The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. and Mitchell, Deborah, eds. 2000. The Foundations of the Welfare State. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E., Parpo, Antti and Kangas, Olli. 2004. The temporal welfare state: the case of Finland. Journal of Social Policy 33: 531–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E., Rice, James Mahmud, Bittman, Michael and Saunders, Peter. 2005. The time-pressure illusion: discretionary time vs free time. Social Indicators Research 73: 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodnow, Jacqueline J. and Bowes, Jennifer M.. 1994. Men, Women and Household Work. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, Linda. 1979. The struggle for reproductive freedom: three stages of feminism. Pp. 107–32 in Capitalist Patriarchy, ed. Eisenstein, Zillah R.. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, Linda 1994. Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare, 1890–1935. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gornick, Janet C. and Jacobs, Jerry A.. 1996. A cross-national analysis of the wages of part-time workers: evidence from the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Work, Employment and Society 10 (1: March): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gornick, Janet C. and Meyers, Marcia K.. 2003. Families that Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Gornick, Janet C., Meyers, Marcia K. and Ross, Katherin E.. 1997. Supporting the employment of mothers: policy variation across fourteen welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy 7: 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, James. 1986. Well-being. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, Siv. 1994. Childcare and types of welfare states. In Sainsbury 1994, pp. 45–61.

Haataja, A. 1998. Tasaetu, tarveharkinta vai ansioperiaate? Sosiaalipolitiikkamallit, mikrosimulaatiot ja työttömien taloudellinen asema. Sosiaalipolitiikan laitos. Turun yliopiston julkaisuja. Sarja C. Osa 141. Turku. English summary: Means tested, flat rate or earnings related benefits? Social policy models, microsimulation and the economic position of the unemployed. Department of Social Policy. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, C:141. Turku.

Hakim, Catherine. 2000. Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hakim, Catherine 2003a. Competing family models, competing social policies. Family Matters 64: 52–61.Google Scholar

Hakim, Catherine 2003b. Public morality versus personal choice: the failure of social attitude surveys. British Journal of Sociology 54: 339–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, Sir Matthew. 1778. The History of the Pleas of the Crown. London: Sollom Emlyn.Google Scholar

Hamermesh, D. S. and J. Lee. 2005. The Economics of Workaholism: We Should Not Have Worked on This Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 11566. Available at: www.nber.org/papers/w11566.

Hamermesh, D. S. and Lee, J. 2007. Stressed out on four continents: time crunch or yuppie kvetch? Review of Economics & Statistics 89: 374–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hancock, Keith. 1979. The first half-century of Australian wage policy. Journal of Industrial Relations 21: 129–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hantrais, Linda. 1993. Women, work and welfare in France. Pp. 116–37 in Women and Social Policies in Europe: Work, Family and the State, ed. Lewis, Jane. Aldershot: Elgar.Google Scholar

Harvey, Andrew S. 1984. Special time budget measures. In Harvey et al. 1984, pp. 116–35.

Harvey, Andrew S., Szalai, Alexander, Elliott, David H., Stone, Philip J. and Clark, Susan N.. 1984. Time Budget Reseach: An ISSC Workbook in Comparative Analysis. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar

Haveman, Robert H. 1993. Who are the nation's truly poor? Problems and pitfalls in (re)defining and measuring poverty. Brookings Review 11 (1: Winter): 24–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haveman, Robert H. and Bershadker, Andrew. 1998. Self-reliance as a poverty criterion: trends in earnings-capacity poverty, 1975–1992. American Economic Review (Papers & Proceedings) 88 (2: May): 342–7.Google Scholar

Haveman, Robert H. and Bershadker, Andrew 2001. The inability to be self-reliant. Review of Income & Wealth 47: 335–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haveman, Robert H. and Buron, L. F.. 1993. Escaping poverty through work – the problem of low earnings capacity in the United States, 1973–88. Review of Income and Wealth 38: 1–15.Google Scholar

Hawrylyshyn, O. 1977. Towards a definition of non-market activities. Review of Income and Wealth 23: 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidenheimer, Arnold J., Heclo, Hugh and Adams, Carolyn Teich. 1990. Comparative Public Policy: The Politics of Social Choice in America, Europe, and Japan. 3rd edn. New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Hernes, Helga. 1984. Welfare State and Woman Power. Oslo: Universiteitsforlaget.Google Scholar

Hillsman, Sally T. 2002. Best practices along the criminal justice process: criminal fines as an intermediate sanction. Speech to ‘Beyond Prisons Symposium’, Kingston, Ont. Available at: www.csc-ssc/gc/ca/text/forum/bprisons/speeches/11_e.shtml.

Hirsch, Fred. 1976. Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1989. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie Russell 1997. The Time Bind. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar

Holloway, Sue, Short, Sandra and Tamplin, Sarah. 2002. Household Satellite Account (Experimental) Methodology. London: Office of National Accounts, National Statistics. Available at: www.statistics.gov.uk/hhsa/hhsa/resources/fileattachments/hhsa.pdf.Google Scholar

Honoré, Tony. 1982. The Quest for Security: Employees, Tenants, Wives. London: Stevens.Google Scholar

International Labour Office (ILO). 1935/1996. Convention concerning the reduction of hours of work to forty a week [signed 1935; came into force 1957]. Vol. I, pp. 261–3 in International Labour Conventions and Recommendations. Geneva: ILO.

Ironmonger, Duncan. 1996. Counting outputs, capital inputs and caring labour: estimating gross household product. Feminist Economics 2 (3): 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Jerry A. and Kathleen Gerson. 2000. The overworked American debate: new evidence comparing ideal and actual working hours. Pp. 71–95 in Work and Family: Research Informing Policy, ed. Parcel, Toby and Cornfield, Daniel B.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Jerry A. and Gerson, Kathleen 2004. The Time Divide: Work, Family and Gender Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jahoda, Marie, Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and Zeisel, Hans. 1933/1971. Marienthal: The Sociography of an Unemployed Community, trans. by the authors with John Reginait and Thomas Elsaesser. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton; originally published 1933.Google Scholar

Jephcott, P. with Seear, N. and Smith, J. H., under the direction of R. Titmuss. 1962. Married Women Working. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Johansson, Sten. 1973. The Level of Living Survey: a presentation. Acta Sociologica 16: 211–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juster, F. Thomas. 1985a. Conceptual and methodological issues involved in the measurement of time use. In Juster and Stafford 1985b, pp. 19–32.

Juster, F. Thomas1985b. Preferences for work and leisure. In Juster and Stafford 1985b, pp. 333–51.

Juster, F. Thomas, Paul N. Courant and Greg K. Dow. 1985. A conceptual framework for the analysis of time allocation data. In Juster and Stafford 1985b, pp. 113–31.

Juster, F. Thomas and Frank P. Stafford, eds. 1985a. Introduction and overview. In Juster and Stafford 1985b, pp. 1–18.

Juster, F. Thomas and Stafford, Frank P. 1985b. Time, Goods and Well-Being. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Centre, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Juster, F. Thomas and Stafford, Frank P. 1991. The allocation of time: empirical findings, behavioral models and problems of measurement. Journal of Economic Literature 29: 471–552.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Diener, Ed and Schwarz, Norbert, eds. 1999. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Kajanoja, Jouko. 1999. Lasten päivähoito investointina [Child Day Care as an Investment]. VATT-tutkimuksia 50. Helsinki: Valtion taloudellinen tutkimuskeskus / Government Institute of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Kamerman, Sheila B. 2003. Welfare states, family policies, and early childhood education, care, and family support: options for the Central and Eastern European (CEE) and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries. Paper presented to the Council of Europe and UNESCO ‘Consultation Meeting on Family Support Policy in Central and Eastern Europe’, September 3–5, 2003, Budapest, Hungary. Available at: www.childpolicyintl.org/intpublications.html.

Kamerman, Sheila B. and Kahn, Alfred J., eds. 1978. Family Policy: Government and Families in Fourteen Countries. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Kamerman, Sheila B., Neuman, Michelle, Waldfogel, Jane and Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne. 2003. Social Policies, Family Types and Child Outcomes in Selected OECD Countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 6. Paris: OECD. Available at: www.childpolicy.org/oecd-workingpaper_6_2003.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kangas, Olli. 1992. The politics of universalism: the case of Finnish sickness insurance. Journal of Social Policy 21: 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kangas, Olli and Joakim Palme. 1996. The development of occupational pensions in Finland and Sweden: class politics and institutional feedbacks. Pp. 211–40 in Privatization of Social Policy, ed. Shalev, Michael. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1785. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Kant, Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Karasek, R. 1979. Job demands, job latitude and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John Maynard, Keynes. 1930. Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. Pp. 358–73 in Essays in Persuasion. London: Macmillan, 1931.Google Scholar

King, Desmond. 1995. Actively Seeking Work? The Politics of Unemployment and Welfare Policy in the United States and Great Britain. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

King, Desmond S. and Waldron, Jeremy. 1988. Citizenship, social citizenship and the defence of welfare provision. British Journal of Political Science 18: 415–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Korpi, Walter 1989. Power, politics and state autonomy in the growth of social citizenship: social rights during sickness in eighteen OECD countries since 1930. American Sociological Review 54: 309–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korpi, Walter 1990. The development of the Swedish welfare state in a comparative perspective. Stockholm: Swedish Institute. Reprinted in Goodin and Mitchell 2000, vol. II, pp. 314–23.

Korpi, Walter 2000. Faces of inequality: gender, class and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics 7: 127–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koven, Seth and Michel, Sonya. 1990. Womanly duties: maternalist policies and the origins of welfare states in France, Germany, Great Britain and the United States, 1880–1920. American Historical Review 95: 1076–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lai, D. W. and McDonald, J. R.. 1995. Life satisfaction of Chinese elderly immigrants in Calgary. Canadian Journal on Aging 14: 536–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, Marilyn. 1992. Mission impossible: how men gave birth to the Australian nation – nationalism, gender and other seminal acts. Gender and History 4 (3: Autumn): 305–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Land, Hilary. 1994. The demise of the male breadwinner – in practice but not in theory: a challenge for social security systems. Pp. 100–15 in Social Security in Transition, ed. Baldwin, Sally and Falkingham, Jane. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Land, Hilary and Hilary Rose. 1985. Compulsory altruism for some or an altruistic society for all. Pp. 74–96 in In Defence of Welfare, ed. Bean, Philipet al. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Landers, Renee M., Rebitzer, James B. and Taylor, Lowell J.. 1996. Rat race redux: adverse selection in the determination of work hours in law firms. American Economic Review 86: 329–48.Google Scholar

Langer, E. J. and Rodin, J.. 1976. The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 191–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lasch, Christopher. 1977. Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Layard, Richard. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Lebergott, Stanley. 1984. The Americans: An Economic Record. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Lefaucheur, Nadine. 1996. ‘At risk families’ and ‘family risks’: a brief history of social welfare provision for single parent families in France. Vol. I, pp. 419–38 in Comparing Social Welfare Systems in Europe, ed. Palier, Bruno. Paris: MIRE.Google Scholar

Lenoir, Rémi. 1991. Family policy in France since 1938. In Ambler 1991, pp. 144–86.Google Scholar

Lewis, Jane. 1980. The Politics of Motherhood: Child and Maternal Welfare in England, 1900–1939. London: Croom Helm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Jane 1986. Lone parent families: politics and economics. Journal of Social Policy 18: 595–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Jane1990. Women's two roles: Myrdal, Klein and post-war feminism. Pp. 167–88 in British Feminism in the Twentieth Century, ed. Smith, Harold. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar

Lewis, Jane 1992. Gender and welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy 2: 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Jane 1997. Gender and welfare regimes: further thoughts. Social Politics 4: 160–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Jane 2001. The End of Marriage? Individualism and Intimate Relations. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar

Lewis, Jane and Åström, Gertrud. 1992. Equality, difference and state welfare: labor markets and family policies in Sweden. Feminist Studies 18: 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liljeström, Rita. 1978. Sweden. In Kamerman and Kahn 1978, pp. 19–48.

Linder, Steffan B. 1970. The Harried Leisure Class. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lindgren, Jarl. 1978. Finland. In Kamerman and Kahn 1978, pp. 270–94.

Luce, R. Duncan and Raiffa, Howard. 1957. Games and Decisions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lundberg, Shelly. 1985. Tied wage-hours offers and the endogeneity of wages. Review of Economics & Statistics 67: 405–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lundberg, Shelly and Pollak, Robert A.. 1994. Noncooperative bargaining models of marriage. American Economic Review (Papers & Proceedings) 84 (2: May): 132–7.Google Scholar

Lynd, Robert S. and Merrell Lynd, Helen. 1937. Middletown in Transition. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar

Machan, Tibor R. 2000. Tax slavery. Available at: www.mises.org/story/410.

Macintyre, Stuart. 1985. Winners & Losers: The Pursuit of Social Justice in Australian History. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McRae, Susan. 2003. Constraints and choices in mothers' employment careers: a consideration of Hakim's Preference Theory. British Journal of Sociology 54: 317–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mahoney, Barry with Greene, Judith A., Eigler, Julie and Green, Joan B.. 1996. How to Use Structured Fines (Day Fines) as an Intermediate Sanction. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance Monograph NCJ 156242. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance. Available at: www.vera.org/publications/publications_5.asp?publication_id=96.Google Scholar

Malthus, T. R. 1826. An Essay on the Principles of Population. 6th edn. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar

Marmot, Michael G. 2004. The Status Syndrome: How Social Standing Affects our Health and Longevity. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Marmot, Michael G., Smith, George Davey, Stansfeld, Stephen, Patel, Chandra, North, Fiona, Head, Jenny, White, Ian, Brunner, Eric and Feeney, Amanda. 1991. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. The Lancet 337: 1387–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marshall, T. H. 1949. Citizenship and social class. Reprinted pp. 70–134 in Marshall, Class, Citizenship and Social Development. University of Chicago Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1858/1972. Grundrisse, ed. and trans. McLellan, David. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1858/1973. Grundrisse, trans. Martin Nicholaus. London: Penguin, 1973.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl1867/1906. Capital, ed. Engels, Frederick, trans. Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling, rev. Ernest Untermann. New York: Modern Library, 1906.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl.1875/1978. Critique of the Gotha Program. In The Marx–Engels Reader, ed. Tucker, Robert C.. 2nd edn. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Masnick, George S. and Jo Bane, Mary. 1980. The Nation's Families. Boston: Auburn Press.Google Scholar

Maume, David J. Jr and Bellas, Marcia L.. 2001. The overworked American or the time bind: assessing competing explanations for time spent in paid labor. American Behavioral Scientist 44: 1137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merz, Joachim. 2002. Time and economic well-being – a panel analysis of desired versus actual working hours. Review of Income and Wealth 48: 317–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1869. The Subjection of Women. Pp. 425–58 in John Stuart Mill, Three Essays, ed. Wollheim, Richard. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Miller, Pavla. 2005. Useful and priceless children in contemporary welfare states. Social Politics 12: 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moene, Karl Ove and Wallerstein, Michael. 1995. How social democracy worked: labor-market institutions. Politics & Society 23: 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, Kimberly J. 2005. The ‘production’ of child care: how labor markets shape social policy and vice versa. Social Politics 12: 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, Kimberly J. 2006. Working Mothers and the Welfare State: Religion and the Politics of Work-family Policies in Western Europe and the United States. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Morris, Norval and Tonry, Michael. 1990. Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. 1995. ‘It will shame the Congress’: a statement on the Senate floor on September 16, 1995. New York Review of Books 62 (16): 71–2.Google Scholar

Murray, Charles. 1984. Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–80. New York: Basic.Google Scholar

Myrdal, Alva. 1944. Nation and Family: The Swedish Experiment in Democratic Family and Population Policy. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar

Myrdal, Alva and Klein, Viola. 1956. Women's Two Roles. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Myrdal, Alva and Myrdal, Gunnar. 1934. Kris i befolkningsfrågan. Stockholm: Bonniers.Google Scholar

Myrdal, Gunnar. 1940. Population: A Problem for Democracy, The Godkin Lectures, 1938. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, Barbara J. 1990. The origins of the two-channel welfare state: Workmen's Compensation and Mothers' Aid. Pp. 123–51 in Women, the State and Welfare, ed. Gordon, Linda. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, Shaun, Stephen Stich, Alan Leslie and David Klein. 1994. Varieties of off-line simulation. Reprinted pp. 39–74 in Theories of Theories of Mind, ed. Carruthers, P. and Smith, P.. Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niemi, Iris. 1993. Systematic error in behavioural measurement: comparing results from interview and time budget studies. Social Indicators Research 30: 229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niemi, Iiris and Pääkkönen, Hannu. 2001. Time Use Changes in Finland through the 1990s. Culture and the Media 2002:2. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.Google Scholar

Nowotny, Helga. 1994. Time: The Modern and Postmodern Experience, trans. Neville Plaice. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

O'Connor, Julia S. 1993. Gender, class and citizenship in the comparative analysis of welfare regimes: theoretical and methodological issues. British Journal of Sociology 44: 501–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Connor, Julia S., Orloff, Ann S. and Shaver, Sheila. 1999. States, Markets, Families: Gender and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Offe, Claus and Heinze, Rolf G.. 1992. Beyond Employment: Time, Work, and the Informal Economy, trans. Alan Braley. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1993. Education at a Glance. Paris: OECD.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)1995. Household Production in OECD Countries: Data Sources and Measurement Methods. Paris: OECD.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)1996. Education at a Glance. Paris: OECD.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)1997a. Education at a Glance. Paris: OECD.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)1997b. Making Work Pay: Taxation, Benefits, Employment and Unemployment. Paris: OECD.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)National Accounts, 1983–1995, Volume II: Detailed Tables. Paris: OECD.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)2001. OECD Employment Outlook, 2001. Paris: OECD.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)2002a. OECD Employment Outlook, 2002. Paris: OECD. ‘Statistical annex’ available at: www.oecd.org/pdf/M00032000/M0003207.pdf.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)2002b. Society at a Glance, 2002. Paris: OECD. ‘Statistical indicators and related data’. Available at: www.oecd.org/EN/document/0,,\\.EN-document-notheme-5-no-1-22006-0,00.html.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)2003. Education at a Glance. Paris: OECD.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)2005a. OECD Employment Outlook, 2005. Paris: OECD. www.oecd.org/document/1/0,2340,en_2649_201185_34855489_1_1_1_1,00.html.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)2005b. Society at a Glance, 2005. Paris: OECD. Available at: www.oecd.org/document/24/0,2340, en_2825_497118_2671576_1_1_1_1,00.html.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)2005c. What are Equivalence Scales?Paris: OECD. Available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/52/35411111.pdf.

Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993. Gender and the social rights of citizenship: the comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review 58: 303–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orloff, Ann Shola 1997. Comments on Jane Lewis's ‘Gender and Welfare Regimes: Further Thoughts’. Social Politics 4: 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orloff, Ann Shola 2002a. Explaining US welfare reform: power, gender, race and the US policy legacy. Critical Social Policy 22: 96–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orloff, Ann Shola 2002b. Women's Employment and Welfare Regimes. Social Policy & Development Paper No. 12. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar

Orshansky, Mollie. 1969. How poverty is measured. Monthly Labor Review 92: 37–41.Google Scholar

Ostner, Ilona. 1993. Slow motion: women, work and the family in Germany. Pp. 92–115 in Women and Social Policies in Europe: Work, Family and the State, ed. Lewis, Jane. Aldershot: Elgar.Google Scholar

Ostner, Ilona and Jane Lewis. 1995. Gender and the evolution of European social policies. Pp. 159–93 in European Social Policy, ed. Liebfried, Stephan and Pierson, Paul. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Oswald, Andrew J. 1997. Happiness and economic performance. Economic Journal 107: 1815–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Padavic, Irene and Reskin, Barbara. 1994. Women and Men at Work. London: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar

Palda, Filip. 1997. Fiscal churning and political efficiency. Kyklos 50: 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palme, Joakim. 1990. Models of old-age pensions. Pp. 104–25 in Needs and Welfare, ed. Ware, Alan and Goodin, Robert E.. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Parker, Stephen. 1990. The Australian Child Support scheme. Family Law 20: 210–14.Google Scholar

Pateman, Carole. 1988a. The patriarchal welfare state. Pp. 231–60 in Democracy and the Welfare State, ed. Gutmann, Amy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pateman, Carole 1988b. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Perlmuter, L. C. and Monty, R. A.. 1977. The importance of perceived control: fact or fantasy?American Scientist 65: 759–65.Google ScholarPubMed

Peterson, Christopher. 1999. Personal control and well-being. In Kahneman et al. 1999, pp. 288–301.

Pettit, Philip. 2001. A Theory of Freedom. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Petty, William. 1899. The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty Together with the Observations upon the Bills of Mortality More Probably by Captain John Graunt, ed. Hull, Charles Henry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pharr, Susan J. and Putnam, Robert D., eds. 2000. Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries?Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Phillips, Anne. 1983. Hidden Hands: Women and Economic Policies. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Phillips, Roderick. 1988. Putting Asunder: A History of Divorce in Western Society. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. 1932. The Economics of Welfare. 4th edn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard A.. 1971. Regulating the Poor. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar

Pollak, Robert A. and Wachter, M. L.. 1975. The relevance of the household production function and its implications for the allocation of time. Journal of Political Economy 83: 255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Postone, Moishe. 1978. Necessity, labour and time: a reinterpretation of the Marxian critique of capitalism. Social Research 45: 739–88.Google Scholar

Pulkkinen, Lea, Kokkonen, Marja and Makiaho, Ari. 1998. Positive affectivity, self-mastery, and a sense of failure as predictors of self-assessed health. European Psychologist 3 (2): 133–42.Google Scholar

Questlaux, Nicole and Jacques Fournier. 1978. France. In Kamerman and Kahn 1978, pp. 117–82.

Radin, Margaret Jane. 1996. Contested Commodities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ransom, Roger L. and Sutch, Richard. 1977. One Kind of Freedom: The Economic Consequences of Emancipation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Reagan, Ronald. n.d. Quotes. Available at: www.quotesforall.com/r/reaganronald.htm.

Rhode, Deborah L. and Martha Minow. 1990. Reforming the questions, questioning the reforms: feminist perspectives on divorce law. Pp. 191–210 in Divorce Reform at the Crossroads, ed. Sugarman, Stephen D. and Kay, Herma Hill. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Rice, James Mahmud, Goodin, Robert E. and Parpo, Antti. 2006. The temporal welfare state: a crossnational comparison. Journal of Public Policy 26: 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rimlinger, Gaston V. 1971. Welfare Policy and Industrialization in Europe, America and Russia. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Ringen, Stein. 1988. Direct and indirect measures of poverty. Journal of Social Policy 17: 351–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, John P. 1977. How Americans Use Time. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Robinson, John P1985. The validity and reliability of diaries versus alternative time use measures. In Juster and Stafford 1985b, pp. 33–62.

Robinson, John P. and Bostrom, Ann. 1994. The overestimated workweek? What time diary measures suggest. Monthly Labor Review 117: 11–23.Google Scholar

Robinson, John P. and Philip E. Converse. 1972. Social change reflected in the use of time. Pp. 17–86 in The Human Meaning of Social Change, ed. Campbell, Angus and Converse, Philip E.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Robinson, John P., Philip E. Converse and Alexander Szalai. 1972. Everyday life in twelve countries. In Szalai et al. 1972, pp. 113–44.

Robinson, John P. and Godbey, G.. 1997. Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use their Time. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, John P. and Godbey, G. 1999. Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use their Time. 2nd edn. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Robson, W. A. 1976. Welfare State and Welfare Society. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Roemer, John E. 1982. Exploitation, alternatives and socialism. Economic Journal 92: 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roemer, John E. 1988. Free to Lose. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rones, Phillip L., Ilg, Randy E. and Garner, Jennifer M.. 1997. Trends in hours of work since the mid-1970s. Monthly Labor Review 120 (4: April): 3–14. Available at: www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1997/04/art1abs.htm.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2000. The New Social Question: Rethinking the Welfare State, trans. Barbara Harshav. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ruddick, Sara. 1980. Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies 6: 342–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruddick, Sara 1989. Maternal Thinking. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar

Ruggles, Patricia. 1990. Drawing the Line: Alternative Poverty Measures and their Implications for Public Policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar

Sainsbury, Diane, ed. 1994. Gendering Welfare States. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Sainsbury, Diane 1996. Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saunders, Peter. 1994. Welfare and Inequality: National and International Perspectives on the Australian Welfare State. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Saunders, Peter, Inge O'Connor and Timothy Smeeding. 1994. The distribution of welfare: inequality, earnings capacity and household production in comparative perspective. SPRC Discussion Papers No. 51 (Nov. 1994). Kensington, NSW: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.

Sawhill, Isabel V. 1999. Families at risk. Pp. 97–135 in Setting National Priorities: The 2000 Election and Beyond. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Schor, Juliet B. 1992. The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Schor, Juliet B. 1993. Preface to the paperback edition. Pp. xv–xvi in The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Schor, Juliet B2000. Working hours and time pressure: the controversy about trends in time use. Pp. 73–86 in Working Time: International Trends, Theory, and Policy Perspectives, ed. Golden, Lonnie and Figart, Deborah M.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Barry. 1975. Queuing and Waiting: Studies in the Social Organization of Access and Delay. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Scitovsky, Tibor. 1976. The Joyless Economy: An Inquiry into Human Satisfaction and Consumer Dissatisfaction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Self, Peter. 1975. Econocrats and the Policy Process: The Politics and Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, Amartya. 1980. Equality of what?Tanner Lectures on Human Values 1: 195–220.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya 1981. Poverty and Famines. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya 1983. Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers 35: 153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, Amartya 1985. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya 1987. The Standard of Living. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, Amartya 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya1996. Social commitment and democracy: the demands of equity and financial conservatism. Pp. 9–38 in Living as Equals, ed. Barker, Paul. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Shafir, E., Diamond, Peter A. and Tversky, Amos. 1997. Money illusion. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 341–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaver, Sheila. 2000. Inequalities, regimes and typologies. Social Politics 7: 215–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaver, Sheila 2002. Gender, welfare, regimes and agency. Social Politics 9: 203–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shubik, Martin. 1971. Games of status. Behavioral Science 16: 117–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvers, Anita, Wasserman, David and Mahowald, Mary B.. 1998. Disability, Difference and Dilemmas: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert A. 1951. A formal theory of the employment relationship. Econometrica 19: 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sirianni, Carmen. 1991. The self-management of time in post-industrial society. In Working Time in Transition, ed. Hinrichs, Karl, Roche, William and Sirianni, Carmen. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 2001. The third concept of liberty. Proceedings of the British Academy 112: 237–68.Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Smeeding, Timothy M. 1997. Time and public policy: why do we care and what instruments are needed? Presented to conference on ‘Time-use, Non-market Work and Family Well-being’, Washington, DC, 20–21 Nov. 1997. Available at: www-cpr.maxwell.syr.edu/faculty/Smeeding/papers/timepolicy.pdf.

Smeeding, Timothy M. and Joseph T. Marchand. 2003. Family time and public policy in the United States. Mimeo., Center for Policy Research, University of Syracuse.

Smeeding, Timothy M., Saunders, P., Coder, J., Jenkins, S., Fritzell, J., Hagenaars, A. J. M., Hauser, R. and Wolfson, M.. 1993. Poverty, inequality and family living standards impacts across seven nations: the effect of noncash subsidies for health, education and housing. Review of Income & Wealth 39: 229–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solow, Robert M. 2000. Welfare: the cheapest country. New York Review of Books 47 (5: 23 Mar.): 20–3.Google Scholar

Sorokin, P. A. and Merton, R. K.. 1937. Social time: a methodological and functional analysis. American Journal of Sociology 42: 615–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorokin, Pitrim and Berger, Clarence. 1939. Time-budgets of Human Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Spengler, Joseph J. 1979. France Faces Depopulation: Postulate Edition, 1936–1976. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Stafford, Frank P. 1985. Issues in modeling behavior with time use data. In Juster and Stafford 1985b, pp. 383–96.

Stark, Cynthia A. 2007. How to include the severely disabled in a contractarian theory of justice. Journal of Political Philosophy 15: 127–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statistics Finland. 2001. Tulonjakotilasto 1999. Tulot ja kulutus [Income Distribution Survey 1999: Incomes and Consumption] 2001: 16. Helsinki: Tilastokeskus/Statistics Finland.

Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1995. Sugar Island Slavery in the Age of Enlightenment: The Political Economy of the Caribbean World. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stinson, Linda L. 1999. Measuring how people spend their time: a time-use survey design. Monthly Labour Review 122 (8: Aug.), 12–19. Available at: http://stats.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1999/08/art3full.pdf.Google Scholar

Stoljar, Samuel. 1989. A history of the French law of divorce. International Journal of Law and the Family 4: 137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strasser, Susan. 1982. Never Done: A History of American Housework. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Oriel and Gershuny, Jonathan. 2001. Cross-national changes in time use: some sociological (hi)stories re-examined. British Journal of Sociology 52: 331–47.Google ScholarPubMed

Sweden. 1931. Proposition 1931: 188.

Sweden.1968. The Status of Women in Sweden. Swedish Government's Report to the United Nations Economic and Social Council. Stockholm: Swedish Institute.

Szalai, Alexander, Converse, Philip, Feldheim, Pierre, Scheuch, Erwin and Stone, Philip. 1972. The Use of Time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Tax Foundation. 2005. America celebrates Tax Freedom Day®. Available at: www.taxfoundation.org/taxfreedomday/.

Jacobus, tenBroek and Matson, Floyd W.. 1966. The disabled and the law of welfare. California Law Review 54: 809–40.Google Scholar

Therborn, Göran. 1995. European Modernity and Beyond. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. 1967. Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past & Present 38: 56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tilton, Timothy A. 1990. The Political Theory of Swedish Social Democracy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Titmuss, Richard M. 1955. The social division of welfare: some reflections on the search for equity. Reprinted pp. 39–59 in The Philosophy of Welfare, ed. Abel-Smith, B. and Titmuss, K.. London: Allen & Unwin, 1987.Google Scholar

Titmuss, Richard M. 1958. Essays on ‘the Welfare State’. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Titmuss, Richard M. 1974. Social Policy. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Tobin, James. 1970. On limiting the domain of inequality. Journal of Law and Economics 13: 263–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexis, Tocqueville. 1835. Address to the Royal Academy of Cherbourg. Pp. 1–27 in Tocqueville and Beaumont on Social Reform, ed. and trans. Seymour Drescher. New York: Harper & Row, 1968. Reprinted as: Memoir on pauperism. The Public Interest 70 (1983): 102–20.Google Scholar

Townsend, Peter. 1979. Poverty in the United Kingdom. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Travers, Peter and Richardson, Sue. 1993. Living Decently: Material Well-being in Australia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

UK Parliament. 1999. Welfare Reform and Pensions Act of 1999. In Acts of the UK Parliament 1999, c. 30. Available at: www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1999/19990030.htm.

UN Department of Economic & Social Affairs, Statistics Division. 2005. Guide to Producing Statistics on Time Use: Measuring Paid and Unpaid Work. ST/ESA/STAT/SER.F.93. New York: United Nations. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/SeriesF/SeriesF_93E.pdf.

UN Statistics Division. 1993. System of National Accounts. New York: United Nations. Available at: unstats.un.org/unsd/sna1993;toctop.asp.

US Bureau of the Census. 1965. The Statistical History of the United States from Colonial Times to the Present. Stamford, CT: Fairfield.

US Congress. 1996. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 [Welfare Reform Act of 1996]. PL 104–193 [HR 3734], August 22, 1996, 100 Stat 2105. Available at: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=104_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ193.104.pdf.

US Council of Economic Advisers (US CEA). 1999. Families and the Labor Market, 1969–1999: Analyzing the ‘Time Crunch’. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Available at: http://clinton4.nara.gov/media/pdf/famfinal.pdf.

US Social Security Administration (US SSA). 1994. Social Security Programs Throughout the World. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

US Social Security Administration (US SSA)2006. Social Security Programs Throughout the World. Available at: www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/progdesc/ssptw/.

Väisänen, Paavo. 2002. Estimation procedure of the Finnish Time Use Survey 1999–2000. Paper presented to the IATUR Annual Conference, Lisbon, 15–18 Oct. 2002. Available at: http://pascal.iseg.utl.pt/~cisep/IATUR/Papers/Vaisanen102f.pdf.

Margot, Doef and Maes, Stan. 1999. The Job Demand-Control (-Support) Model and psychological well-being: a review of 20 years of empirical research. Work and Stress 13 (2): 87–114.Google Scholar

Robert, Veen and Groot, Loek. 2006. Post-productivism and welfare states: a comparative analysis. British Journal of Political Science 36: 593–618.Google Scholar

Kersbergen, Kees. 1995. Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parijs, Philippe. 1995. Real Freedom for All. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Praag, Bernard M. S. and Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada. 2005. Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wanrooy, Brigid and Wilson, Shaun. 2006. Convincing the toilers? Dilemmas of long working hours in Australia. Work, Employment and Society 20: 349–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanek, Joann. 1974. Time spent in housework. Scientific American 231 (5 Nov.): 116–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Varjonen, Johanna and Eeva Hamunen. 1999. Proposal for a satellite account of household production. Statistics Directorate, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, STD/NA(99)17. Paris: OECD. Available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/62/2680989.pdf.

Veenhoven, Ruud. 1984. Conditions of Happiness. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veenhoven, Ruud 1999. Quality-of-life in individualistic society. Social Indicators 48: 157–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vickery, Claire. 1977. The time-poor: a new look at poverty. Journal of Human Resources 12: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walby, Sylvia. 1989. Theorizing patriarchy. Sociology 23: 213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walby, Sylvia 1990. Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Walby, Sylvia1992. Post-post-modernism: theorizing social complexity. Pp. 31–52 in Destabilizing Theory, ed. Barratt, Michèle and Phillips, Anne. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar

Waring, Marilyn. 1988. If Women Counted: A New Feminist Economics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Warr, Peter. 1990. Decision latitude, job demands, and employee well-being. Work and Stress 4: 285–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren, Charles. 1926. The Supreme Court in United States History. Rev. edn. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Weaver, R. Kent. 2000. Ending Welfare as We Know It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Weiner, Bernard. 1985. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review 92: 548–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weir, Margaret, Orloff, Ann Shola and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 1988. The Politics of Social Policy in the United States. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Weitzman, Lenore J. 1985. The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Wennemo, Irene. 1994. Sharing the Costs of Children. Dissertation Series 25. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

Whiteford, Peter and Bradshaw, Jonathan. 1994. Benefits and incentives for lone parents: a comparative analysis. International Social Security Review 47 (3–4): 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whiteford, Peter, Stanton, David and Gray, Matthew. 2001. Families and income security: changing patterns of social security and related policy issues. Family Matters 60: 24–35.Google Scholar

Whitehouse, Gillian. 2001. Recent trends in pay equity: beyond the aggregate statistics. Journal of Industrial Relations 43: 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilensky, Harold L. 1961. The uneven distribution of leisure: the impact of economic growth on ‘free time’. Social Problems 9 (1): 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilensky, Harold L. 2002. Rich Democracies: Political Economy, Public Policy and Performance. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Wilensky, Harold and Lebeaux, C. N.. 1958. Industrial Society and Social Welfare. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Williams, Joan. 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do about It. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, John, Thomson, Jane and McMahon, Anthony, eds. 1996. The Australian Welfare State: Key Documents and Themes. Melbourne: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar

Wollstein, Jarret B. 2005. We must end tax slavery now. Available at: www.free-market.net/resources/lit/end-tax-slavery.html.

Wooden, Mark. 1997. Enterprise bargaining and the gender earnings gap. Australian Bulletin of Labour 23: 214–26.Google Scholar

World Bank. 1994. Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth. Oxford University Press.

World Bank2005. Human Development Report 2005: International Cooperation at a Crossroads: Aid, Trade and Security in an Unequal World. Oxford University Press for the World Bank. Available at: hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2005/.

World Health Organization (WHO). 2005. The World Health Report 2005: Make Every Mother and Child Count. Geneva: WHO. Available at: www.who.int/whr/2005/en/.

Young, Iris Marion. 1995. Mothers, citizenship and independence: a critique of pure family values. Ethics 105: 535–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Michael and Willmott, Peter. 1973. The Symmetrical Family: A Study of Work and Leisure in the London Region. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Zeckhauser, Richard J. 1973. Time as the ultimate source of utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87: 668–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeckhauser, Richard J1974. Risk spreading and distribution. Pp. 206–28 in Redistribution through Public Choice, ed. Hochman, Harold M. and Peterson, George E.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Zelizer, Viviana A. 1985. Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Zelizer, Viviana A. 1994. The Social Meaning of Money. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar