Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on the contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 ‘A world apart’: gentlemen amateurs to professional generalists
- 2 ‘Experiencing the foreign’: British foreign policy makers and the delights of travel
- 3 Arbitration: the first phase, 1870–1914
- 4 ‘Only a d…d marionette’? The influence of ambassadors on British Foreign Policy, 1904–1914
- 5 Old diplomacy and new: the Foreign Office and foreign policy, 1919–1939
- 6 The evolution of British diplomatic strategy for the Locarno Pact, 1924–1925
- 7 Chamberlain's ambassadors
- 8 The Foreign Office and France during the Phoney War, September 1939–May 1940
- 9 Churchill the appeaser? Between Hitler Roosevelt and Stalin in World War Two
- 10 From ally to enemy: Britain's relations with the Soviet Union, 1941–1948
- Works by Zara Steiner
- Select bibliography
- Index
5 - Old diplomacy and new: the Foreign Office and foreign policy, 1919–1939
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on the contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 ‘A world apart’: gentlemen amateurs to professional generalists
- 2 ‘Experiencing the foreign’: British foreign policy makers and the delights of travel
- 3 Arbitration: the first phase, 1870–1914
- 4 ‘Only a d…d marionette’? The influence of ambassadors on British Foreign Policy, 1904–1914
- 5 Old diplomacy and new: the Foreign Office and foreign policy, 1919–1939
- 6 The evolution of British diplomatic strategy for the Locarno Pact, 1924–1925
- 7 Chamberlain's ambassadors
- 8 The Foreign Office and France during the Phoney War, September 1939–May 1940
- 9 Churchill the appeaser? Between Hitler Roosevelt and Stalin in World War Two
- 10 From ally to enemy: Britain's relations with the Soviet Union, 1941–1948
- Works by Zara Steiner
- Select bibliography
- Index
Summary
Before the war I was called obstinate, prejudiced, unbalanced; during and after it the epithets clung and grew. They may be true; if they are not they are an interesting record of the anger that one can rouse by hampering the desire for a compromise never possible with regimes whose nature rejects it.
Vansittart, 1958It's the old complex – the old ideology … I haven't got such lack of faith in our diplomacy that I daren't open up with friend or foe. This was the grand fault of our policy 1933–1938 …
Cadogan, August 1943Between 1918 and 1939, the Foreign Office lacked the influence over British foreign policy that it had exercised before the outbreak of the Great War. Part of the reason stemmed from other departments of state seeking to force their views on the Cabinet and its advisory bodies about what British interests were and how best to protect them. Another came from the fact that far more than before 1914 there existed a range of articulate individuals and powerful domestic organisations that, having their intellectual roots in wartime criticism of the ‘old diplomacy’ practised before 1914, were both interested in foreign policy and sought to influence its nature and content. Finally, there were the efforts of the two prime ministers at the beginning and end of the period, respectively, David Lloyd George and Neville Chamberlain, to bring foreign policy under Downing Street's control. Still, less Foreign Office influence did not necessarily translate into a loss of authority for politically powerful foreign secretaries and their ‘professional’ advisers.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Diplomacy and World PowerStudies in British Foreign Policy, 1890–1951, pp. 79 - 114Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1996
- 1
- Cited by