Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- PART I BONAPARTISM TO ITS CONTEMPORARIES
- PART II BONAPARTISM, CAESARISM, TOTALITARIANISM: TWENTIETH-CENTURY EXPERIENCES AND REFLECTIONS
- 7 Max Weber and the Avatars Of Caesarism
- 8 The Concept of Caesarism in Gramsci
- 9 From Constitutional Technique to Caesarist Ploy: Carl Schmitt on Dictatorship, Liberalism, and Emergency Powers
- 10 Bonapartist and Gaullist Heroic Leadership: Comparing Crisis Appeals to an Impersonated People
- 11 The Leader and the Masses: Hannah Arendt on Totalitarianism and Dictatorship
- PART III ANCIENT RESONANCES
- Index
10 - Bonapartist and Gaullist Heroic Leadership: Comparing Crisis Appeals to an Impersonated People
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2013
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- PART I BONAPARTISM TO ITS CONTEMPORARIES
- PART II BONAPARTISM, CAESARISM, TOTALITARIANISM: TWENTIETH-CENTURY EXPERIENCES AND REFLECTIONS
- 7 Max Weber and the Avatars Of Caesarism
- 8 The Concept of Caesarism in Gramsci
- 9 From Constitutional Technique to Caesarist Ploy: Carl Schmitt on Dictatorship, Liberalism, and Emergency Powers
- 10 Bonapartist and Gaullist Heroic Leadership: Comparing Crisis Appeals to an Impersonated People
- 11 The Leader and the Masses: Hannah Arendt on Totalitarianism and Dictatorship
- PART III ANCIENT RESONANCES
- Index
Summary
Attempts to simplify by dichotomizing the complexity of French political traditions, either in an attempt to achieve intellectual clarity or from a polemical urge to promote guilt or virtue by repulsion and association, have been numerous since the French Revolution. There have been more historically sensitive efforts to respect the variety within each component of the left/right duality. In particular, Réne Rémond's distinction between three French rights - ultra-racist legitimist, Orléanist, liberal and Bonapartist nationalist - had much to commend it when first formulated in 1954. However, in later editions he sought to force Gaullism into this tripartite straightjacket while warning that “Historical rapprochements are normally only the most subtle form of anachronism.” A presupposition of this chapter's deliberate use of hindsight to see nineteenth-century Bonapartism through the twentieth-century phenomenon of Gaullism is that it allows us to offer a retrospective corrective to ill-considered attributions of either ignominious or glorious ancestry.
While acknowledging that the Bonapartist nationalist right incorporated minority left-wing elements, Rémond argued that dependence upon its predominantly right-wing support pushed it rightward under Napoleon, Louis Napoleon, Boulanger, and de Gaulle. He was prepared to accept that in theory Bonapartism “lent itself to many interpretations. Political Janus, its ambiguity allowed within limits some scope for adaptation. In 1849 it could, almost equally and with equal likelihood, have given birth to a left-wing or right-wing Bonapartism.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Dictatorship in History and TheoryBonapartism, Caesarism, and Totalitarianism, pp. 221 - 240Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004