Ackerman, Bruce, “Constitutional Politics/Constitutional Law,” Yale Law Journal, 99 (1989), pp. 453–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce, The Future of Liberal Revolution, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce, “Higher Lawmaking,” Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 63–88.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce, “Neo-Federalism?” Constitutionalism and Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 153–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce, We the People: Foundations, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce, We the People: Transformations, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Adamson, L. Walter, “Beyond ‘Reform or Revolution’: Notes on Political Education in Gramsci, Habermas and Arendt,” Theory and Society, 6:3 (1978), pp. 429–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, translated by Heller-Roazen, Daniel, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio, State of Exception, translated by Attell, Kevin, Chicago: University of Chicago, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ankersmit, F. R., Aesthetic Politics: Political Philosophy beyond Fact and Value, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Albrow, Martin, “Legal Positivism and Bourgeois Materialism: Max Weber's View of the Sociology of Law,” British Journal of Law and Society, 2 (1975), pp. 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonio, Robert J., “Values, History, and Science: The Metatheoretic Foundations of the Weber-Marx Dialogue,” in A Weber-Marx Dialogue, edited by Antonio, Robert J. and Glassman, Ronald M., Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1985, pp. 20–45.Google Scholar

Antonio, Robert J., and Glassman, Ronald M., A Weber-Marx Dialogue, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1985.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew, Civil Society, Constitution, and Legitimacy, Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew, “Dilemmas Arising from the Power to Create Constitutions in Eastern Europe,” Cardozo Law Review, 14:3–4 (1993), pp. 661–690.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew, “Forms of Constitution Making and Theories of Democracy,” Cardozo Law Review, 17:2 (1995), pp. 202–254.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew, From Neo-Marxism to Democratic Theory: Essays in the Critical Theory of Soviet-Type Societies, New York: M. Sharpe, 1993.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew, “Slouching toward Philadelphia?” Constellations, 3:2 (1996), pp. 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, New York: Penguin Books, 1993.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, Crises of the Republic, New York: Harvest/HBJ Books, 1969.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, Essays in Understanding, 1930–1954, edited by Kohn, Gerome, New York: Harcourt Brace, 1994.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy, edited by Beiner, Ronald, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, The Life of the Mind, San Diego: Harvest Book, 1978.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, Men in Dark Times, New York: Harvest Book, 1968.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, “On Hannah Arendt,” in Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World, edited by Hill, Melvyn A., New York: St. Martin's Press, 1979, pp. 301–340.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, On Revolution, New York: Penguin Books, 1990.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism, New York: Harvest Book, 1979.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, “Public Rights and Private Interests,” in Small Comforts for Hard Times: Humanists on Public Policy, edited by Mooney, M. and Stuber, F., New York: Columbia University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, “Revolution and Freedom/A Lecture,” in In Zwei Welten: Siegfried Moses zum füfundsiebzigsten Geburtstag, edited by Trimmer, Hans, Tel Aviv: Verlag Bitaon, 1962.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, “Some Questions of Moral Philosophy,” Social Research, 61:4 (Winter 1994), pp. 739–764.Google Scholar

, Aristotle, Politics, translated by Rackham, H., Loeb Classical Collection, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond, “Max Weber and Power-Politics,” in Max Weber and Sociology Today, edited by Stammer, Otto, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1971, pp. 83–100.Google Scholar

Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1998.Google Scholar

Badiou, Alain, Abrégé de métapolitique, Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1998.Google Scholar

Balakrishnan, Gopal, The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt, London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar

Barber, Sotirios, On What the Constitution Means, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Barnouw, Dagmar, “Speech Regained: Hannah Arendt and the American Revolution,” Clio, 15:2 (1986), pp. 137–152.Google Scholar

Beaud, Olivier, La puissance de l' état, Paris: PUF, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beetham, David, Max Weber and the Theory of Modern Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Beiner, Ronald, “Rereading Hannah Arendt's Kant Lectures,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 23:1 (1997), pp. 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bendersky, Joseph, Carl Schmitt: A Theorist for the Reich, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bendersky, Joseph, “Carl Schmitt in the Summer of 1932: A Reexamination,” Cahiers Vilfredo Pareto, 16:44 (1978), pp. 39–54.Google Scholar

Bendersky, Joseph, “The Expendable Kronjurist: Carl Schmitt and National Socialism, 1933–1936,” Journal of Contemporary History, 14:2 (1979), pp. 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bendix, Reinhard, Max Weber: An Intellectual Biography, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Bendix, Reinhard, and Roth, Guenther (eds.), Scholarship and Partisanship: Essays on Max Weber, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971.

Benhabib, Seyla, “Judgment and the Moral Foundations of Politics in Hannah Arendt's Thought,” in Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, New York: Routledge, 1992, pp. 121–147.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla, The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1996.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter, “Theses on the Philosophy of History,” in Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, edited by Arendt, Hannah, New York: Schocken Books, 1968, pp. 253–264.Google Scholar

Bensman, Joseph, and Givant, Michael, “Charisma and Modernity: The Use and Abuse of a Concept,” Social Research, 42:4 (1975), pp. 570–614.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard, Philosophical Profiles: Essays in a Pragmatic Mode, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobbio, Norberto, Democracy and Dictatorship: The Nature and Limits of State Power, translated by Kennealy, Peter, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Bobbio, Norberto, Essais de théorie du droit, Paris: Bruylant L.G.D.J., 1998.Google Scholar

Bobbio, Norberto, “Kelsen et les sources du droit,” Archives de philosophie du droit, 27 (1982), pp. 135–145.Google Scholar

Böckenforde, Ernst Wolfgang, “Schmitt Revised,” Telos, 109 (1996), pp. 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böckenforde, Ernst Wolfgang, Staat, Verfassung, Democratie. Studien zur Verfassungstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, “Gènese et structure du champ religieux,” Revue française de sociologie, 12:3 (1971), pp. 295–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology, translated by Adamson, Matthew, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Language and Symbolic Power, translated by Raymond, Gino and Adamson, Matthew, introduced by Thompson, John B., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, “Legitimation and Structured Interests in Weber's Sociology of Religion,” in Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity, London: Allen and Unwin, 1987, pp. 119–136.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Propos sur le champ politique, Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon, 2000.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, “Some Properties of Fields,” in Sociology in Question, translated by Nice, Richard, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1993, pp. 72–78.Google Scholar

Breiner, Peter, Max Weber and Democratic Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Brennan, Catherine, Max Weber on Power and Social Stratification: An Interpretation and Critique, Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997.Google Scholar

Bruun, H. H., Science, Values, and Politics in Weber's Methodology, Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1972.Google Scholar

Burdeau, Georges, Traité de science politique: le statut du pouvoir dans l'état, Vol. IV, Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1983.Google Scholar

Caldwell, Peter C., Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law: The Theory and Practice of Weimar Constitutionalism, Durham: Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Calhoun, Craig, and McGowan, John (eds.), Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.

Canovan, Margaret, “The Contradictions of Hannah Arendt's Political Thought,” Political Theory, 6:1 (1978), pp. 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canovan, Margaret, Hannah Arendt: An Interpretation of Her Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canovan, Margaret, “Hannah Arendt as a Conservative Thinker,” in Hannah Arendt: Twenty Years Later, edited by May, Larry and Kohl, Jerome, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar

Carré de Malberg, Raymond, Contribution à la théorie générale de l'État, Vol. II, Paris: Librairie de la société du Recueil Sirey, 1920.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius, The Castoriadis Reader, edited by Curtis, David Ames, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius, “Democracy as Procedure and Democracy as Regime,” Constellations, 4:1 (1997), pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius, “The First Institution of Society and Second-Order Institutions,” Free Associations, 12 (1988), pp. 39–51.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius, The Imaginary Institution of Society, translated by Blamey, Kathleen, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius, Philosophy, Politics, Autonomy: Essays in Political Philosophy, edited and translated by Curtis, David Ames, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius, World in Fragments: Writings on Politics, Society, Psychoanalysis, and the Imagination, edited and translated by Curtis, David Ames, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Cavalli, Luciano, “Charisma and Twentieth-Century Politics,” Max Weber: Rationality and Modernity, edited by Whimster, Sam and Lash, Scott, London: Allen and Unwin, 1987, pp. 317–333.Google Scholar

Cavalli, Luciano, Il capo carismatico: per una sociologia weberiana della leadership, Bologna: Il Mulino, 1981.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean, “Rights and Citizenship in Hannah Arendt: Dilemmas of Arendtian Republicanism,” Constellations, 3:2 (1996), pp. 164–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Jean, and Arato, Andrew, Civil Society and Political Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Constant, Benjamin, Political Writings, edited by Fontana, Biancamaria, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Cristi, Renato, Carl Schmitt and Authoritarian Liberalism, Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Cristi, Renato, “The Metaphysics of Constituent Power: Schmitt and the Genesis of Chile's 1980 Constitution,” Cardozo Law Review, 21:5–6 (2000), pp. 1749–1775.Google Scholar

Dallmayr, Fred, “Max Weber and the Modern State,” in The Barbarism of Reason: Max Weber and the Twilight of Enlightenment, edited by Horowitz, Asher and Maley, Terry, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994, pp. 49–67.Google Scholar

Dellinger, Walter, “The Legitimacy of Constitutional Change: Rethinking the Amending Process,” Harvard Law Review, 97 (1983), pp. 380–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

d' Entrèves, Maurizio Passerin, The Political Philosophy of Hannah Arendt, London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

Maistre, Joseph, Du Pape, Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1966.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, “Declarations of Independence,” New Political Science, 15 (1986), pp. 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, “Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundations of Authority,’” in Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, edited by Carlson, David Gray, Cornell, Drucilla, and Rosenfeld, Michel, New York: Routledge, 1992, pp. 3–67.Google Scholar

Diner, Dan, and Stolleis, Michael (eds.), Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt: A Juxtaposition, Tel Aviv: Bleicher Verlag, 1999.

Dow, Thomas E., Jr., “An Analysis of Weber's Work on Charisma,” British Journal of Sociology, 29:1 (1978), pp. 83–93.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David (ed.), Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism, Durham: Duke University Press, 1998.

Dyzenhaus, David, (ed.), Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen, and Hermann Heller in Weimar, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

Duso, Giuseppe (ed.), La Politica oltre lo Stato. Carl Schmitt, Venice: Arsenale Cooperativa, 1981.

Eberl, Matthias, Die Legitimitat der Moderne: Kulturkritik und Herrschaftskonzeption bei Max Weber und Carl Schmitt, Merburg: Tectum Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, N. S. (ed.), Max Weber on Charisma and Institutional Building, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.

Eliaeson, Sven, “Constitutional Caesarism: Weber's Politics in Their German Context,” in The Cambridge Companion to Weber, edited by Turner, Stephen P., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eliaeson, Sven, “Max Weber and Plebiscitary Democracy,” in Max Weber: Democracy and Modernization, edited by Schroeder, Ralph, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998, pp. 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliot, Jonathan, Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution as Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia in 1787, edited by McClellan, James and Bradford, M. E., Cumberland, Va.: J. River Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Elshtain, Jean Bethke, “Hannah Arendt's French Revolution,” Salmagundi, 84 (1989), pp. 203–213.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, “Constitutional Bootstrapping in Philadelphia and Paris,” Cardozo Law Review, 14:3–4 (1993), pp. 549–575.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, “Deliberation and Constitution Making,” in Deliberative Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon, (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRef

Elster, Jon, “Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process,” Duke Law Journal, 45:2 (November 1995), pp. 364–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon, Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality, Cambridge and Paris: Cambridge University Press and Éditions de la maison des sciences de l'homme, 1979.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon, and Slagstad, Rune (eds.), Constitutionalism and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRef

Esquith, Stephen L., “Politics and Values in Marx and Weber,” in A Weber-Marx Dialogue, edited by Antonio, Robert J. and Glassman, Ronald M., Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1985, pp. 300–318.Google Scholar

Euben, Peter, “Corruption,” Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, edited by Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell L., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 220–245.Google Scholar

Fehér, Ferenc, “Freedom and the ‘Social Question’ (Hannah Arendt's Theory of the French Revolution),” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 12:1 (1987), pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, S. M., “An Interpretation of Max Weber's Theory of Law: Metaphysics, Economics, and the Iron Law of Constitutional Law,” Law and Social Inquiry, 16:2 (1991), pp. 205–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferber, Christian, Die Gewalt in der Politik. Auseinandersetzung mit Max Weber, Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 1970.Google Scholar

Ferrara, Alessandro, Justice and Judgment, London: Sage Publications, 1999.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Foundations of Transcendental Philosophy [1796–1799], Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Finley, M. I., Ancient History: Evidence and Models, New York: Penguin Books, 1985.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian, John Locke and the Theory of Sovereignty: Mixed Monarchy and the Right of Resistance in the Political Thought of the English Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy, “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy,” in Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Calhoun, Craig, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992, pp. 109–142.Google Scholar

Freund, Julien, The Sociology of Max Weber, New York: Pantheon Books, 1968.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Carl J., Constitutional Government and Democracy: Theory and Practice in Europe and America, Boston: Ginn, 1950.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L., “Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart,” Harvard Law Review, 71:4 (1958), pp. 630–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furet, François, and Ran, Halévi (eds.), Orateurs de la Révolution française: I. Les constituants, Paris: Gallimard, 1989.

Galli, Carlo, “Carl Schmitt's Antiliberalism: Its Theoretical and Historical Sources and Its Philosophical and Political Meaning,” Cardozo Law Review, 21:5–6 (2000), pp. 1597–1617.Google Scholar

Gauchet, Marcel, La religion dans la democratie. Parcours de la laiçite, Paris: Gallimard, 1998.Google Scholar

Gauchet, Marcel, Les revolutions des pouvoirs. La souveraineté, le peuple et la representation: 1789–1799, Paris: Editions Gallimard, 1992.Google Scholar

Germain, Gilbert G., “The Revenge of the Sacred: Technology and Reenchantment,” in The Barbarism of Reason: Max Weber and the Twilight of Enlightenment, edited by Horowitz, Asher and Maley, Terry, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994, pp. 248–266.Google Scholar

Geuss, Raymond, History and Illusion in Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony, Politics and Sociology in the Thought of Max Weber, London: Macmillan, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gierke, Otto, Political Theories of the Middle Age, translated by F. W. Maitland, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1900.Google Scholar

Gómez, Serrano Enrique, Consenso y conflicto. Schmitt, Arendt y la definición de lo político, Mexico: Centro de Estudios de Política Comparada, A.C., 1998.Google Scholar

Gottsegen, Michael, The Political Thought of Hannah Arendt, Albany: State University of New York, 1994.Google Scholar

Gramsci, Antonio, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, edited and translated by Hoare, Quintin and Smith, Geoffrey Nowell, New York: International Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar

Gray, J. Glenn, “The Abyss of Freedom – and Hannah Arendt,” in Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World, edited by Hill, Melvyn A., New York: St. Martin's Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Griffin, Stephen M., “Constitutionalism in the United States: From Theory to Politics,” in Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Sanford Levinson, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 37–62.Google Scholar

Groethuysen, Bernard, Philosophie de la révolution française, Paris: Gallimard, 1992.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, Le droit de la guerre et de la paix, Paris: PUF, 1999.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” Political Theory, 29:6 (December 2001), pp. 766–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, “The Horrors of Autonomy: Carl Schmitt in English,” in The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians' Debate, edited by Nicholsen, Shierry Weber, Cambridge: Mass.: MIT Press, 1992, pp. 128–139.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, edited by Cronin, Ciaran and Greiff, Pablo, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, translated by Cronin, Ciaran P., Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, (ed.), Observations on “The Spiritual Situation of the Age,” translated by Buchwalter, Andrew, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985.

Habermas, Jürgen, Philosophical-Political Profiles, translated by Lawrence, Frederick G., Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, The Theory of Communicative Action: I. Reason and the Rationalization of Society, translated by Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John, and Madison, James, The Federalist: A Commentary on the Constitution of the United States, introduced by Earle, Edward Mead, New York: Modern Library, 1937.Google Scholar

Hauriou, Maurice, Précis de droit constitutionnel, Paris: Sirey, 2nd ed., 1929.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A., The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A., Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Restatement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, Vol. II. The Mirage of Social Justice, London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., Elements of the Philosophy of Right, edited by Wood, Allen W. and translated by Nibset, H. B., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Heller, Hermann, Gesammelte Schrifften, edited by Borinski, Fritz, Drath, Martin, Niemeyer, Gerhart, and Stammer, Otto, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1992.Google Scholar

Hennis, Wilhelm, Max Weber: Essays in Reconstruction, translated by Tribe, Keith, London: Allen and Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar

Hennis, Wilhelm, “Zum Problem der deutschen Staatsanschauung,” Vierteljahreshefte Zeitgeschichte, 7 (1959), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

Herf, Jeffrey, Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Herrera, Carlos Miguel (ed.), Le droit, le politique autour de Max Weber, Hans Kelsen, Carl Schmitt, Paris: Éditions L'Harmattan, 1995.

Herrera, Carlos Miguel (ed.) Théorie juridique et politique chez Hans Kelsen, Paris: Éditions KIMÉ, 1997.

Hill, Melvyn A., “The Fictions of Man and the Stories of Men,” in Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World, edited by Hill, Melvyn A., New York: St. Martin's Press, 1979, pp. 275–300.Google Scholar

Hill, Melvyn A., (ed.), Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1979.

Hinchman, Lewis P., and Hinchman, Sandra K. (eds.), Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays, New York: State University of New York Press, 1994.

Hirschman, Albert O., Representative Democracy and Its Limits, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O., The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hirst, Paul, “Socialism, Pluralism, and Law,” International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 13 (1985).Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, edited by Richard Tuck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Hobsbawn, Eric J., Revolutionaries: Contemporary Essays, New York: Pantheon Books, 1973.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen, The Anatomy of Anti-Liberalism, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen, “Carl Schmitt: Theorist of the Reich,” American Political Science Review, 77:4 (1983), pp. 1066–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Stephen, “Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy,” Constitutionalism and Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 195–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Stephen, and Sunstein, Cass, “The Politics of Constitutional Revision in Eastern Europe,” in Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Sanford Levinson, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 275–306.Google Scholar

Honeywell, J. A., “Revolution: Its Potentialities and Its Degradations,” Ethics, 80:4 (1970), pp. 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honig, Bonnie, Democracy and the Foreigner, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Honig, Bonnie, Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Cambridge, Mass.: Polity Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Asher, Horowitz, and Terry, Maley (eds.), The Barbarism of Reason: Max Weber and the Twilight of Enlightenment, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994.

Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Mossner, Ernest C., London and New York: Penguin Books, 1984.Google Scholar

Ingram, David, “Novus Ordo Seclorum: The Trial of (Post) Modernity or the Tale of the Two Revolutions,” in Hannah Arendt: Twenty Years Later, edited by May, Larry and Kohl, Jerome, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996, pp. 221–250.Google Scholar

Isaac, Jeffrey C., Arendt, Camus, and Modern Rebellion, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isaac, Jeffrey C., “Oases in the Desert: Hannah Arendt on Democratic Politics,” American Political Science Review, 88:1 (1994), pp. 156–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jay, Martin, Permanent Exiles: Essays on the Intellectual Migration from Germany to America, New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Jay, Martin, “Reconciling the Irreconcilable? Rejoinder to Kennedy,” Telos, 71 (1987), pp. 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, Thomas, Political Writings, edited by Peterson, Merrills, New York: Library of America, 1984.Google Scholar

Joas, Hans, The Creativity of Action, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kalberg, Stephen, “The Role of Ideal Interests in Max Weber's Comparative Historical Sociology,” in A Weber-Marx Dialogue, edited by Antonio, Robert J. and Glassman, Ronald M., Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1985, pp. 46–67.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, Andreas, “The Basic Norm and Democracy in Hans Kelsen's Legal and Political Theory,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 32:5 (2006), pp. 573–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalyvas, Andreas, “Carl Schmitt and the Three Moments of Democracy,” Cardozo Law Review, 21:5–6 (2000), pp. 1525–1595.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, Andreas, “Charismatic Politics and the Symbolic Foundations of Power in Max Weber,” New German Critique, 85 (2002).Google Scholar

Kalyvas, Andreas, “From the Act to the Decision: Hannah Arendt and the Question of Decisionism,” Political Theory, 32:4 (2004), pp. 320–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalyvas, Andreas, “Hegemonic Sovereignty: Antonio Gramsci, Carl Schmitt, and the Constituent Prince,” Journal of Political Ideologies, 5:3 (2000), pp. 343–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalyvas, Andreas, “Popular Sovereignty, Democracy, the Constituent Power,” Constellations, 12:2 (2005), pp. 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kantorowicz, Ernst H., The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Kateb, George, “Arendt and Representative Democracy,” Salmagundi, 60 (1983), pp. 3–19.Google Scholar

Kateb, George, “Death and Politics: Hannah Arendt's Reflections on the American Constitution,” Social Research, 54:3 (1987), pp. 605–616.Google Scholar

Kateb, George, Hannah Arendt: Politics, Conscience, Evil, Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Allanheld Publishers, 1983.Google Scholar

Kateb, George, “Political Action: Its Nature and Advantages,” in The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt, edited by Villa, Dana R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 130–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keenan, Alain, “Promises, Promises. The Abyss of Freedom and the Loss of the Political in the Work of Hannah Arendt,” Political Theory 22:2 (1994), pp. 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Allgmeine Staatslehre, Vienna: Nachdruck, 1993.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Das Problem der Souveränitat und die theorie des Völkerrechts, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1920.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “Foundations of Democracy,” Ethics, 66:1 (1955), pp. 1–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State, translated by Anders Wedberg, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1945.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory, translated by Paulson, Bonnie Litschewski and Paulson, Stanley, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “On the Basic Norm,” California Law Review, 47:1 (1959), pp. 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law, translated by Knight, Max, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Théorie génerale des norms, Paris: PUF, 1996.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, What Is Justice? Justice, Law and Politics in the Mirror of Science, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Ellen, “Carl Schmitt and the Frankfurt School,” Telos, 73 (1987), pp. 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Ellen, Constitutional Failure: Carl Schmitt in Weimar, Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kervégan, Jean-François, “La critique schmittienne du normativisme kelsénien,” Le droit, le politique autour de Max Weber, Hans Kelsen, Carl Schmitt, edited by Herrera, Carlos Miguel, Paris: Éditions L'Harmattan, 1995, pp. 229–242.Google Scholar

Kervégan, Jean-François, Hegel, Carl Schmitt. Le politique entre spéculation et positivité, Paris: PUF, 1992.Google Scholar

Klein, Claude, Théorie et pratique du pouvoir constituant, Paris: PUF, 1996.Google Scholar

Kontos, Alkis, “The World Disenchanted, and the Return of Gods and Demons,” The Barbarism of Reason: Max Weber and the Twilight of Enlightenment, edited by Horowitz, Asher and Maley, Terry, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994, pp. 223–247.Google Scholar

Koubi, Geneviève, and Romi, Raphaël, Etat, Constitution, Loix, Paris: Éditions de l'Espace Européene, 1991.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto, “Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony,” Deconstruction and Pragmatism, edited by Mouffe, Chantal, London: Verso, 1996, pp. 47–68.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto, Emancipation(s), London: Verso, 1996.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto, “Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics,” in Butler, Judith, Laclau, Ernesto, and Zizek, Slavoj, Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, London: Verso, 2000, pp. 44–89.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto, New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time, London: Verso, 1990.Google Scholar

Larmore, Charles, The Morals of Modernity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lassman, Peter, and Velody, Irving (eds.), Max Weber's “Science as a Vocation,”London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.

Lefort, Claude, Democracy and Political Theory, translated by Macey, David, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Lefort, Claude, L'invention démocratique, Paris: Fayard, 1981.Google Scholar

Lefort, Claude, The Political Forms of Modern Society, edited by Thompson, John, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford, “How Many Times Has the United States Constitution Been Amended? (A) < 26; (B) 26; (C) 27; (D) > 27: Accounting for Constitutional Change,” in Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Sanford Levinson, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 13–36.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford, (ed.), Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRef

Levy, Carl, “Max Weber and Antonio Gramsci,” in Max Weber and His Contemporaries, edited by Mommsen, Wolfgang, and Osterhammel, Jürgen, London: Unwin Hyman, 1987, pp. 382–402.Google Scholar

Lichtheim, George, The Concept of Ideology and Other Essays, New York: Random House, 1967.Google Scholar

Lilla, Mark, “The Enemy of Liberalism,” New York Review of Books, 44:8, May 15, 1997, pp. 38–44.Google Scholar

Lincoln, Abraham, Speeches and Writings, 1832–1858, New York: Library of America, 1989.Google Scholar

Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government, edited by Laslett, Peter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, Karl, Max Weber's Political Ideas in the Perspective of Our Time, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Löwith, Karl, Max Weber and Karl Marx, edited by Botomore, Tom and Outhwaite, William, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1982.Google Scholar

Löwith, Karl, Meaning in History, Chicago and London: Phoenix Books and University of Chicago Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Lutz, Donald S., “Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment,” in Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 237–274.Google Scholar

Luxemburg, Rosa, Reform or Revolution, London and Chicago: Bookmarks, 1989.Google Scholar

Madison, James, “Letter to George Washington, Oct. 18, 1787,” in Writings, edited by Rakove, Jack, New York: Library of America, 1999.Google Scholar

Maggiori, Roberto, Liberation, November 17, 1988.

Malgieri, Gennaro, “La recezione di Carl Schmitt in Italia,” Revue Européenne des sciences sociales-Cahiers Vilfredo Pareto, 16 (1978), pp. 181–186.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard, The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert, “Industrialization and Capitalism in the Work of Max Weber,” in Negations: Essays in Critical Theory, Boston: Beacon Press, 1968, pp. 201–226.Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert, and Adorno, Theodor, “Correspondence on the Student Revolutionaries,” New Left Review, 233 (1999), pp. 118–136.Google Scholar

Markell, Pachen, “The Rule of the People: Arendt, Arché, and Democracy,” American Political Science Review, 100:1 (2006), pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marx, Karl, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, edited by Dobb, Maurice, translated by Ryazanskaya, S. W., New York: International Publishers, 1970.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, The German Ideology: Part One, edited by Arthur, C. J., New York: International Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, and Frederich, Engels, Selected Works in One Volume, London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1970.Google Scholar

The Marx-Engels Reader, edited by Tucker, Robert C., New York and London: W. W. Norton, 1978.

Maus, Ingeborg, Zur Aufklärung der Demorkratietheorie. Rechts- und Demokratietheoretische Uberlegungen im Anschluss an Kant, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992.Google Scholar

May, Larry, and Kohl, Jerome (eds.), Hannah Arendt: Twenty Years Later, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996.

Mayer, Jacob Peter, Max Weber and German Politics, New York: Arno Press, 1979.Google Scholar

McCormick, John, Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCormick, John, “The Dilemmas of Dictatorship: Carl Schmitt and Constitutional Emergency Powers,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 10:1 (1997), pp. 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntosh, David, “Weber and Freud: On the Nature and Source of Authority,” American Sociological Review, 35 (1970), pp. 901–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Adventures of the Dialectic, translated by Bien, Joseph, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Michelet, Jules, Cours au collège de la France: 1838–1851, Vol. I, Paris: Gallimard, 1995.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank, “Always under the Law?” Constitutional Commentary, 12:2 (1995), pp. 227–247.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank, Brennan and Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank, “Can Constitutional Democrats Be Legal Positivists? Or Why Constitutionalism,” Constellations, 2:3 (1996), pp. 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michelman, Frank, “Constitutional Authorship,” in Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Alexander, Larry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 64–98.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank, “How Can the People Ever Make the Laws? A Critique of Deliberative Democracy,” in Deliberative Democracy, edited by Bohman, James and Rehg, William, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996, pp. 145–172.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank, “Law's Republic,” Yale Law Journal, 97 (1988), pp. 1493–1537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michels, Robert, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, translated by Paul, Eden and Paul, Cedar with an introduction by Seymour Martin Lipset, New York: Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Miller, James, “The Pathos of Novelty: Hannah Arendt's Image of Freedom in the Modern World,” in Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World, edited by Hill, Melvyn A., New York: St. Martin's Press, 1979, pp. 177–208.Google Scholar

Mommsen, Wolfgang, The Age of Bureaucracy: Perspectives on the Political Sociology of Max Weber, New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1974.Google Scholar

Mommsen, Wolfgang, Max Weber and German Politics, 1890–1920, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Mommsen, Wolfgang, The Political and Social Thought of Max Weber, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Mommsen, Wolfgang, and Osterhammel, Jürgen(eds.), Max Weber and His Contemporaries, London: Unwin Hyman, 1987.

Mouffe, Chantal, “Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 10:1 (1997), pp. 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal, (ed.), The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, London: Verso, 1999.

Mouffe, Chantal, (ed.), Deconstruction and Pragmatism, London: Verso, 1996.

Mouffe, Chantal, The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal, On the Political, London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal, “Penser la démocratie moderne avec, et contre, Carl Schmitt,” Revue française de science politique, 42:1 (1992), pp. 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal, The Return of the Political, London: Verso, 1993.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner, “Carl Schmitt – An Occasional Nationalist?” History of European Ideas, 23:1 (1997), pp. 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner, A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Muller, Jerry Z., “Carl Schmitt, Hans Freyer, and the Radical Conservative Critique of Liberal Democracy in the Weimar Republic,” History of Political Thought, 12:4 (1991), pp. 695–715.Google Scholar

Murphy, Walter E., “Merlin's Memory: The Past and Future Imperfect of the Once and Future Polity,” in Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Sanford Levinson, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 163–190.

Murphy, Walter E., “An Ordering of Constitutional Values,” Southern California Law Review, 53 (1980), pp. 703–756.Google Scholar

Murphy, E. Walter, and Tanenhaus, Joseph(eds.), Comparative Constitutional Law, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1977.CrossRef

Negretto, Gabriel L., and Rivera, Aguilar, José, Antonio, “Liberalism and Emergency Powers in Latin American. Reflections on Carl Schmitt and the Theory of Constitutional Dictatorship,” Cardozo Law Review, 21:5–6 (2000), pp. 1797–1824.Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio, Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State, translated by Maurizia Boscagli, Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Neokleous, Mark, “Friend or Enemy? Reading Schmitt Politically,” Radical Philosophy, 79 (1996), pp. 13–23.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich, Basic Writings of Nietzsche, edited and translated by Kaufmann, Walter, New York: Modern Library, 1992.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich, On the Genealogy of Morality, edited by Keith Ansell-Pearson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Ober, Josiah, Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Palaver, Wolfgang, “A Girardian Reading of Schmitt's Political Theology,” Telos, 93 (1992), pp. 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, R. R., The Age of the Democratic Revolution, 2 vols., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959–1964.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott, The Structure of Social Action, New York: Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Pasquino, Pasquale (ed.), Preface to Carl Schmitt, Parliementarisme et démocratie, Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1988, pp. 20.

Pasquino, Pasquale (ed.), “Die Lehre vom ‘Pouvoir Constituant’ bei Emmanuel Sieyès und Carl Schmitt,” in Complexio Oppositorum. Über Carl Schmitt, edited by Quaritsch, Helmut, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1988, pp. 371–385.

Paulson, Stanley, Introduction to Hans Kelsen, Théorie générale du droit et de l'État, Paris: Bruylant L.G.D.J., 1997, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar

Paulson, Stanley, “Lon Fuller, Gustav, Radbruch, and the ‘Positivist Thesis,’” Law and Philosophy, 13 (1994), pp. 313–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paulson, Stanley, “On the Early Development of the Grundnorm,” in Law, Life, and the Image of Man: Modes of Thought in Modern Legal Theory; Festschrift for Jan M. Broekman, edited by Fleerackers, Frank, Leeuwen, Evert, and Roermund, Bert, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1997, pp. 217–230.Google Scholar

Piccone, Paul, and Ulmen, L. Gary, “Introduction to Carl Schmitt,” Telos, 72 (1987), pp. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna F., The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt's Concept of the Social, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna F., The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna F., “Justice: Relating the Private and the Public,” in Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays, edited by Hinchman, Lewis P. and Hinchman, Sandra K., Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994, pp. 261–288.Google Scholar

Preuss, Ulrich, “Constitutional Powermaking for the New Polity: Some Deliberations on the Relations between Constituent Power and the Constitution,” Cardozo Law Review, 14:3–4 (1993), 636–660.Google Scholar

Preuss, Ulrich, Constitutional Revolution: The Link Between Constitutionalism and Progress, translated by Schneider, Deborah Lucas, Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Preuss, Ulrich, “The Critique of German Liberalism: Reply to Kennedy,” Telos, 71 (1987), pp. 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preuss, Ulrich, “Political Order and Democracy. Carl Schmitt and His Influence,” in The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, edited by Mouffe, Chantal, London: Verso, 1999, pp. 155–179.Google Scholar

Rasch, William, Sovereignty and Its Discontents: The Primacy of Conflict and the Structure of the Political, London: Birkbeck Law Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Rawls, John, “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” in Collected Papers, edited by Freeman, Samuel, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Rawls, John, Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenfeld, Michel, and Arato, Andrew (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.

Rossiter, Clinton L., Constitutional Dictatorship in the Modern Democracies, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1948.Google Scholar

Roth, Guenther, “Political Critiques,” in Scholarship and Partisanship: Essays on Max Weber, edited by Bendix, Reinhard and Roth, Guenther, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971, pp. 55–69.Google Scholar

Roth, Guenther, and Schluchter, Wolfgang, Max Weber's Vision of History: Ethics and Methods, Berkeley: California University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jan-Jacques, The Social Contract, translated by Maters, Judith R., New York: St. Martin's Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Scaff, Lawrence A., Fleeing the Iron Cage: Culture, Politics, and Modernity in the Thought of Max Weber, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Scheuerman, William, Between the Norm and the Exception: The Frankfurt School and the Rule of Law, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Scheuerman, William, Carl Schmitt: The End of Law, Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.Google Scholar

Scheuerman, William, “Carl Schmitt and the Nazis,” German Politics and Society, 23 (1991), pp. 71–79.Google Scholar

Scheuerman, William, “The Fascism of Carl Schmitt: A Reply to George Schwab,” German Politics and Society, 29 (1993), pp. 33–50.Google Scholar

Scheuerman, William, “Legal Indeterminacy and the Origins of the Nazi Legal Thought: The Case of Carl Schmitt,” History of Political Thought, 17:4 (1996), pp. 571–590.Google Scholar

Scheuerman, William, “The Rule of Law under Siege: Carl Schmitt and the Death of the Weimar Republic,” History of Political Thought, 14:2 (1993), pp. 265–280.Google Scholar

Scheuerman, William, (ed.), The Rule of Law under Siege: Selected Essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.

Scheuerman, William, “The Unholy Alliance of Carl Schmitt and Friedrich Hayek,” Constellations, 4:2 (1997), pp. 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schluchter, Wolfgang, (ed.), Max Webers Sicht des okzidentalen Christentums: Interpretation und Kritik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988.

Schluchter, Wolfgang, (ed.), Max Webers Studie über das antike Judentum: Interpretation und Kritik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981.

Schluchter, Wolfgang, (ed.), Max Webers Studie über Konfuzianismus und Taoismus: Interpretation und Kritik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1983.

Schluchter, Wolfgang, Paradoxes of Modernity: Culture and Conduct in the Theory of Max Weber, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Schluchter, Wolfgang, Rationalism, Religion, and Domination: A Weberian Perspective, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Schluchter, Wolfgang, Religion und Lebensfuhrung, 2 Vols., Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988.Google Scholar

Schluchter, Wolfgang, The Rise of Western Rationalism: Max Weber's Developmental History, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Schluchter, Wolfgang, and Toby, Huff, E. (eds.), Max Weber and Islam, New Brunswick: Transaction, 1999.

Schmitt, Carl, “The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations,” translated by John McCormick, Telos, 96 (1993), pp. 130–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political, translated and edited by Schwab, George, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, translated by Ellen Kennedy, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, “Das Gesetz zur der Not von Volk und Reich,” Deutsche Juristen-Zeitung, 38:1 (1933), pp. 455–458.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, “Das gute Recht der deutschen Revolution,” Westdeutscher Beobacthen, 12:108 (1933), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, “Der Begriff der modernen Demokratie in seinem Verhältnis zum Staatsbegriff,” in Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles, 1923–1939, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1988, pp. 22–28.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, “Der bürgerliche Rechstaat,” in Staat, Grossraum, Nomos. Arbeiten aus den Jahren 1916–1969, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1995, pp. 44–54.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Der Hüter der Verfassung, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Die Dictatur, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1994.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, “Die Dictatur des Reichpräsidenten nach article 48 der Weimarer Verfassung,” in Die Dictatur, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1994, pp. 211–257.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, “Die Wendung zum totalen Staat,” in Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles, 1923–1939, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1988.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Legalität und Legitimität, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1993, pp. 166–178.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Concept, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, The Nomos of the Earth, translated by Ulmen, Gary, New York: Telos Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Political Romanticism, translated by Oakes, Guy, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, translated by George Schwab, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Politische Theologie II. Die Legende von der Erledigung jeder Politischen Theologie, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1970.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Roman Catholicism and Political Form, translated and annotated by Ulmen, Gary L., Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, “Staatethik und pluralistischer Staat,” in Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles, 1923–1939, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1988, pp. 151–165.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, “Strong State and Sound Economy: An Address to Business Leaders,” in Carl Schmitt and Authoritarian Liberalism, edited by Cristi, Renato, Cardiff: University ofWales Press, 1998, pp. 212–232.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Über die drei Arten des rechtswissenschaftlichen Denkens, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Verfassungslehre, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1989.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, “Weiterentwicklung des totalen Staats in Deutschland,” in Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles, 1923–1939, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1988, pp. 211–217.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, “Wesen and Werden des faschistischen Staat,” in Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles, 1923–1939, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1988, pp. 124–130.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, London: Unwin, 1987.Google Scholar

Schwab, George, The Challenge of Exception: An Introduction to the Political Ideas of Carl Schmitt between 1921 and 1936, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Schwab, George, “Progress of the Schmitt Studies in the English-Speaking World,” in Complexio Oppositorum. Über Carl Schmitt, edited by Quaritsch, Helmut, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1988, pp. 447–459.Google Scholar

Shils, Edward A., “Charisma, Order, and Status,” American Sociological Review, 34:2 (1973), pp. 199–213.Google Scholar

Sieyès, Emmanuel, Qu'est-ce que le Tiers état?Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1970.Google Scholar

Sieyès, Emmanuel, “Reconnaissance et exposition raisonnée des droits de l'homme et du citoyen,” in Orateurs de la Révolution française: I. Les Constituants, edited by Furet, François and Halévi, Ran, Paris: Gallimard, 1989, pp. 1005–1018.Google Scholar

Sitton, John F., “Hannah Arendt's Argument for Council Democracy,” in Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays, edited by Hinchman, Lewis P. and Hinchman, Sandra K., Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994, pp. 307–334.Google Scholar

Slagstad, Rune, “Liberal Constitutionalism and Its Critics: Carl Schmitt and Max Weber,” in Constitutionalism and Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon, and Slagstad, Rune, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 103–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sohm, Rudolf, Outlines of Church History [1887], translated by Sinclair, M., Boston: Beacon Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Sollner, A., “Beyond Carl Schmitt: Political Theory in the Frankfurt School,” Telos, 71 (1987), pp. 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorel, Georges, Reflections on Violence, edited by Jennings, Jeremy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spinoza, Baruch, A Theologico-Political Treatise and A Political Treatise, translated by Elwes, R. H. M., New York: Dover Publications, 1951.Google Scholar

Stammer, Otto (ed.), Max Weber and Sociology Today, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1971.

Staniszkis, Jadwiga, Poland's Self-Limiting Revolution, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Staten, Henry, Wittgenstein and Derrida, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Steding, Christoph, Politik und Wissenschaft bei Max Weber, Breslau, 1932.Google Scholar

Strauss, Leo, “Comments on Carl Schmitt's Der Begriff des politischen,” in Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1977, pp. 83–107.Google Scholar

Tenbruck, Friedreich H., “The Problem of Thematic Unity in the Works of Max Weber,” British Journal of Sociology, 31 (1980), pp. 316–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Kirk, “Constitutional Theory and Political Action,” Journal of Politics, 31:3 (1969), pp. 655–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thornill, Chris, Political Theory in Modern Germany: An Introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Tronti, Mario, Il Politico. Da Machiavelli a Cromwell, Vol. I, Milano: Fetrinelli, 1979.Google Scholar

Troper, Michel (ed.), “Y-a-t-il un État nazi?” Pour une Théorie juridique de l'état, Paris: PUF, 1994, pp. 177–182.

Tur, Richard, and Twining, William (eds.), Essays on Kelsen, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.

Turner, Bryan S., For Weber: Essays in the Sociology of Fate, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar

Turner, Bryan S., Max Weber: From History to Modernity, London: Routledge, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, Bryan S., Weber and Islam: A Critical Study, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974.Google Scholar

Turner, Stephen P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Weber, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRef

Turner, Stephen P., and Factor, Regis A., “Decisionism and Politics: Weber as a Constitutional Thinker,” in Max Weber: Rationality and Modernity, edited by Sam Whimster and Scott Lash, London: Allen and Unwin, 1987, pp. 334–353.Google Scholar

Turner, Stephen P., and Factor, Regis A., Max Weber: The Lawyer as Social Thinker, London: Routledge, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ulmen, Gary L., Politischer Mehrwert: Eine Studie über Max Weber und Carl Schmitt, Weinheim: VCH Acta humaniora, 1991.Google Scholar

Ulmen, Gary L., “The Sociology of the State: Carl Schmitt and Max Weber,” State, Culture, and Society, 1 (1985), pp. 3–49.Google Scholar

Unger, Roberto, Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory, New York: Free Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Unger, Roberto, Social Theory: Its Situation and Its Task, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia, “Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism,” Cardozo Law Review, 21:5–6 (2000), pp. 1645–1651.Google Scholar

Villa, Dana R., Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Villa, Dana R., (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRef

Villa, Dana R., Politics, Philosophy, Terror: Essays on the Thought of Hannah Arendt, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vincent, Jean-Marie, Max Weber ou la démocratie inachevée, Paris: Éditions du Félin, 1998.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, “Arendt's Constitutional Politics,” in The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt, edited by Villa, Dana R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walzer, Michael, Interpretation and Social Criticism, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, The Agrarian Sociology of Ancient Civilizations [1909], translated by Frank, R. I., London: Verso, 1998.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, Ancient Judaism, New York: Free Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, Critique of Stammler, translated by Oakes, Guy, New York: Free Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, edited by Guenther Roth and Clauss Wittich, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Sociologie und Sozialpolitik, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1924.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, translated and edited by Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A., New York: Free Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, Political Writings, edited by Lassman, Peter, and Speirs, Ronald, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, translated by Parsons, Talcott, London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, “The Protestant Sects and the Spirit of Capitalism,” in From Max Weber Essays in Sociology, edited by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, New York: Routledge, 1991, pp. 302–322.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, “Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions,” in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, New York: Routledge, 1991, pp. 323–359.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, “The Social Psychology of the World Religions,” in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, New York: Routledge, 1991, pp. 267–301.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, The Sociology of Religion, Boston: Beacon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Wellmer, Albrecht, “Arendt on Revolution,” in The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt, edited by Villa, Dana R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 220–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whimster, Sam, and Lash, Scott (eds.), Max Weber: Rationality and Modernity, London: Allen and Unwin, 1987.

Wolin, Richard, “Carl Schmitt, Political Existentialism, and the Total State,” Theory and Society, 19:4 (1990), pp. 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolin, Richard, “Carl Schmitt, the Conservative Revolutionary Habitus and the Aesthetics of Horror,” Political Theory, 20:3 (1992), pp. 427–447.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon S., “Fugitive Democracy,” in Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by Benhabib, Seyla, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996, pp. 31–45.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon S., “Hannah Arendt: Democracy and the Political,” in Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays, edited by Hinchman, Lewis P. and Hinchman, Sandra K., Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994, pp. 289–306.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon S., “Norm and Form: The Constitutionalizing of Democracy,” in Athenian Political Thought and the Reconstruction of American Democracy, edited by Peter Euben, J., Wallach, John R., and Ober, Josiah, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994, pp. 29–58.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon S., The Presence of the Past: Essays on the State and the Constitution, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon S., “Transgression, Equality, and Voice,” in Demokratia: A Conversation on Democracies Ancient and Modern, edited by Ober, J. and Hedrick, C., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996, pp. 63–90.Google Scholar

Wrong, Dennis (ed.), Max Weber, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970.

Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth, “From the Pariah's Point of View,” in Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World, edited by Hill, Melvin A., New York: St. Martins Press, 1979, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar

Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth, Hannah Arendt: For the Love of the World, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Zaretsky, Eli, “Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Public/Private Distinction,” in Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, edited by Calhoun, Craig and McGowan, John, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997, pp. 207–231.Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj, “Carl Schmitt in the Age of Post-Politics,” in The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, edited by Mouffe, Chantal, London: Verso, 1999, pp. 18–37.Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj, The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Center of Political Ontology, London: Verso, 1999.Google Scholar