Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Treatise on Militarism
- 2 Vacuoles of Noncommunication: Minor Politics, Communist Style and the Multitude
- 3 1,000 Political Subjects …
- 4 The Becoming-Minoritarian of Europe
- 5 Borderlines
- 6 The Event of Colonisation
- 7 Deterritorialising the Holocaust
- 8 Becoming Israeli/Israeli Becomings
- 9 Affective Citizenship and the Death-State
- 10 Arresting the Flux of Images and Sounds: Free Indirect Discourse and the Dialectics of Political Cinema
- 11 Information and Resistance: Deleuze, the Virtual and Cybernetics
- 12 The Joy of Philosophy
- Notes on Contributors
- Index
8 - Becoming Israeli/Israeli Becomings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Treatise on Militarism
- 2 Vacuoles of Noncommunication: Minor Politics, Communist Style and the Multitude
- 3 1,000 Political Subjects …
- 4 The Becoming-Minoritarian of Europe
- 5 Borderlines
- 6 The Event of Colonisation
- 7 Deterritorialising the Holocaust
- 8 Becoming Israeli/Israeli Becomings
- 9 Affective Citizenship and the Death-State
- 10 Arresting the Flux of Images and Sounds: Free Indirect Discourse and the Dialectics of Political Cinema
- 11 Information and Resistance: Deleuze, the Virtual and Cybernetics
- 12 The Joy of Philosophy
- Notes on Contributors
- Index
Summary
Although in previous writings on postzionism (Silberstein 1999), I drew my primary critical tools of analysis from Foucault, I had already begun to sense the importance of Deleuze and Guattari to my project. Applying such concepts as discourse, power relations, regimes of truth and power/knowledge, I analysed both Zionism and postzionism in terms of discourse and the debates between zionists and postzionists as a conflict of discourses. Over the years, however, I have increasingly sensed the inadequacy of that representation. Through a continued reading of Deleuze and Guattari, I have come to see ways in which their concepts move the discussion beyond the place enabled by my application of Foucault. Some of my own reservations have been cogently stated by Deleuze:
If I speak, with Felix, of the agencement (assemblage) of desire, it is because I am not sure that micro-dispotifs can be described in terms of power. For myself, an agencement of desire is never either a ‘natural’ or a ‘spontaneous’ determination … Desire circulates in this agencement of heterogeneous elements, in this type of ‘symbiosi’ … In short, it is not the dispotifs of power that assemble (agenceraient) nor would they be constitutive; it is rather the agencements of desire that would spread throughout the formations of power following one of their dimensions.
(Deleuze 1997: 185–6)- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Deleuze and the Contemporary World , pp. 146 - 160Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2006