Ashworth, A., Principles of Criminal Law, 4th edn (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C., The Legislative History of the International Criminal Court, vol. I (3 vols., Ardsley, NY: Transnational, 2005).Google Scholar

Cassese, A., International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Didion, J., ‘Salvador’, in We Tell Ourselves Stories in Order to Live: Collected Nonfiction (New York: A. A. Knopf, 2006).Google Scholar

Gallant, K. S., The Principle of Legality in International and Comparative Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Gardiner, R., Treaty Interpretation (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Grover, L., Interpreting Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Jennings, R. and Watts, R., Oppenheim’s International Law, 9th edn (Harlow: Longman, 1992).Google Scholar

Kittichaisaree, K., International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

MacCormick, D. N. and Summers, R. S. (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1991).Google Scholar

Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Rescher, N., Presumption and the Practices of Tentative Cognition (Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schabas, W. A., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schabas, W. A., The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Schachter, O., International Law in Theory and Practice (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1991).Google Scholar

Thirlway, H. W. A., International Customary Law and Codification (Leiden: Sijthoff, 1972).Google Scholar

Villiger, M. E., Customary International Law and Treaties (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985).Google Scholar

Villiger, M. E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).Google Scholar

Werle, G., Principles of International Criminal Law (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2005).Google Scholar

Ambos, K., ‘Some Preliminary Reflections on the Mens Rea Requirements of the Crimes in the ICC Statute and the Elements of Crimes’, in Vohrah, L. C. et al. (eds.), Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law, 2003), 11–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Negotiating the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 3–57.Google Scholar

Bitti, G., ‘Article 21 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Treatment of Sources of Law in the Jurisprudence of the ICC’, in Stahn, C. and Sluiter, G. (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), 285–304.Google Scholar

Boot, M., Dixon, R. and Hall, C. K. (revised by Hall, C. K.), ‘Article 7’, in Triffterer, O. (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (Munich: Beck, 2008), 159–273.Google Scholar

Broomhall, B., ‘Article 22’, in Triffterer, O. (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (Munich: Beck, 2008), 713–29.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Article 9’, in Triffterer, O. (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (Munich: Beck, 2008), 505–29.Google Scholar

Dörr, O., ‘General Rule of Interpretation’, in Dörr, O. and Schmalenbach, K. (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Berlin: Springer, 2012), 521–70.Google Scholar

Kirsch, P., ‘The Work of the Preparatory Commission’, in Lee, R. S. et al. (eds.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Ardsley, NY: Transnational, 2001), xlv–lv.Google Scholar

Kirsch, P., ‘Customary International Humanitarian Law, its Enforcement, and the Role of the International Criminal Court’, in Maybee, L. and Chakka, B. (eds.), Custom as a Source of International Humanitarian Law (New Delhi: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2006), 79–86.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2008–), online edition, available at: www.mpepilcom.Google Scholar

Kreβ, C., Barriga, S., Grover, L. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘Negotiating the Understandings on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 81–97.Google Scholar

Pellet, A., ‘Applicable Law’, in Cassese, A. et al. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. II (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2002), 1051–84.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘Criminal Responsibility for Violations of Human Rights’, in Symonides, J. (ed.), Human Rights: International Protection, Monitoring, Enforcement (Paris: UNESCO, 2003), 281–302.Google Scholar

Schachter, O., ‘Entangled Treaty and Custom’, in Dinstein, Y. (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1989), 717–38.Google Scholar

Triffterer, O., ‘Article 10’, in Triffterer, O. (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (Munich: Beck, 2008), 531–37.Google Scholar

Triffterer, O., ‘Can the “Elements of Crimes” Narrow or Broaden Responsibility for Criminal Behaviour defined in the Rome Statute?’, in Stahn, C. and Sluiter, G. (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), 381–400.Google Scholar

von Hebel, H., ‘The Decision to Include Elements of Crimes in the Rome Statute’, in Lee, R. S. et al. (eds.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Ardsley, NY: Transnational, 2001), 3–8.Google Scholar

von Hebel, H. and Robinson, D., ‘Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court’, in Lee, R. S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (The Hague: Kluwer Law, 1999), 79–126.Google Scholar

von Hebel, H. and Robinson, D., ‘Reflections on the Elements of Crimes’, in Lee, R. S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999), 219–31.Google Scholar

Ashworth, A., ‘Interpreting Criminal Statutes: A Crisis of Legality?’, Law Quarterly Review, 107 (1991), 419–49.Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Grover, L., ‘A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression’, American Journal of International Law, 105 (2011), 517–33.Google Scholar

Baxter, R., ‘Multilateral Treaties as Evidence of Customary International Law’, British Yearbook of International Law, 41 (1965–66), 275–300.Google Scholar

Benatar, M., ‘From Probative Value to Authentic Interpretation: The Legal Effects of Interpretative Declarations’, Revue Belge de Droit International, 44 (2011), 170–96.Google Scholar

Cassese, A., ‘The Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some Preliminary Reflections’, European Journal of International Law, 10 (1999), 144–71.Google Scholar

Chodosh, H., ‘An Interpretive Theory of International Law: The Distinction Between Treaty and Customary Law’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 28 (1995), 973–1068.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., ‘Interaction between Customary International Law and Treaties’, Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 322 (2006), 243–427.Google Scholar

Dörmann, K., ‘Contributions by the Ad Hoc Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda to the Ongoing Work on Elements of Crimes in the Context of the ICC’, ASIL Proceedings, 94 (2000), 284–86.Google Scholar

Gaeta, P., ‘May Necessity be Available as a Defence for Torture in the Interrogation of Suspected Terrorists?’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2 (2004), 785–94.Google Scholar

Glaser, S., ‘Nullum Crimen Sine Lege’, Journal of Comparative Legislation & International Law, 24 (1942), 29–37.Google Scholar

Glennon, M. J., ‘The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression’, Yale Journal of International Law, 35 (2010), 71–114.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, A. E., ‘The Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine in the Supreme Court, Revisited’, American Journal of Criminal Law, 30 (2003), 279–313.Google Scholar

Grover, L., ‘A Call to Arms: Fundamental Dilemmas Confronting the Interpretation of Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, European Journal of International Law, 21 (2010), 543–83.Google Scholar

Hall, J., ‘Nulla Poena Sine Lege’, Yale Law Journal, 47 (1937), 165–93.Google Scholar

Heller, K. J., ‘Retreat from Nuremberg: The Leadership Requirement in the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 18 (2007), 477–97.Google Scholar

Heller, K. J., ‘The Uncertain Legal Status of the Aggression Understandings’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 229–48.Google Scholar

Hogg, P. W. and Zwibel, C. F., ‘The Rule of Law in the Supreme Court of Canada’, University of Toronto Law Journal, 55 (2005), 715–32.Google Scholar

Jeffries, J. C. Jr., ‘Legality, Vagueness, and the Construction of Penal Statutes’, Virginia Law Review, 71 (1985), 189–245.Google Scholar

Jeßberger, F., ‘Bad Torture – Good Torture? What International Criminal Lawyers may Learn from the Recent Trial of Police Officers in Germany’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 3 (2005), 1059–73.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘The Crime of Aggression before the First Review of the ICC Statute’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 20 (2007), 851–65.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression: A Reply to Andreas Paulus’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 1129–46.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Remarks’, ASIL Proceedings, 105 (2011), 160–62.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–1217.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’, British Yearbook of International Law, 26 (1949), 48–85.Google Scholar

Lietzau, W. K., ‘Checks and Balances and Elements of Proof: Structural Pillars for the International Criminal Court’, Cornell International Law Journal, 32 (1999), 477–88.Google Scholar

McCarl, R., ‘Incoherent and Indefensible: An Interdisciplinary Critique of the Supreme Court’s “Void-for-Vagueness” Doctrine’, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 42 (2014), 73–94.Google Scholar

McRae, D. M., ‘The Legal Effect of Interpretative Declarations’, British Yearbook of International Law, 49 (1978), 155–73.Google Scholar

Milanovic, M., ‘Aggression and Legality: Custom in Kampala’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 165–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milanovic, M., ‘Is the Rome Statute Binding on Individuals? (and Why We Should Care)’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9 (2011), 25–52.Google Scholar

Murphy, S. D., ‘Aggression, Legitimacy and the International Criminal Court’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1147–56.Google Scholar

Öberg, M. D., ‘The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ’, European Journal of International Law, 16 (2006), 879–906.Google Scholar

Orentlicher, D. F., ‘Criminalizing Hate Speech in the Crucible of Trial: Prosecutor v. Nahimana’, New England Journal of International & Comparative Law, 12 (2005), 17–50.Google Scholar

Paulus, A., ‘Second Thoughts on the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1117–28.Google Scholar

Sadat, L. N., ‘Custom, Codification and Some Thoughts about the Relationship Between the Two: Article 10 of the ICC Statute’, DePaul Law Review, 49 (2000), 909–23.Google Scholar

Weigend, T., ‘“In General a Principle of Justice”: The Debate on the “Crime against Peace” in the Wake of the Nuremberg Judgment’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 41–58.Google Scholar

Weil, P., ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?’, American Journal of International Law, 77 (1983), 413–42.Google Scholar

Cantoni v. France, App. No. 17862/91, ECHR, 1996-V, No. 20.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar

Doe v. Bolton, 410 US 179 (1973).Google Scholar

Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 US 104 (1972).Google Scholar

Hill v. Colorado, 530 US 703 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 US 489 (1982).Google Scholar

House of Lords, R v. Jones et al. [2006] UKHL 16.Google Scholar

Interlocutory Decision on the Applicable Law: Terrorism, Conspiracy, Homicide Perpetration, Cumulative Charging, STL-11-01/I, 16 February 2011.Google Scholar

International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg), Judgment, 1 October 1946, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenya Situation, Decision Pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute on the Authorization of an Investigation into the Republic of Kenya, ICC-01/09, 31 March 2010.Google Scholar

Kolender v. Lawson, 461 US 352 (1983).Google Scholar

Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), ICJ Reports (1986), 14.Google Scholar

Nahimana and Others v. Prosecutor, Judgment, ICTR-99-52-A, 28 November 2007.Google Scholar

North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Germany v. The Netherlands), ICJ Reports (1969), 3.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Al-Bashir, Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for a Warrant of Arrest against Omar Hassan Ahmand Al-Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/094, 4 March 2009.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Bemba, Decision Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute on the Charges of the Prosecutor Against Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, ICC-01/05-01/08, 15 June 2009.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Erdemović, Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Cassese, ICTY-96-22-A, 7 October 1997.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on the Final System of Disclosure and the Establishment of a Timetable, ICC-01/04-01/06, 15 May 2006.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment on the Prosecutor’s Application for Extraordinary Review of the Pre-Trial Chamber I’s 31 March 2006 Decision Denying Leave to Appeal, ICC-01/04-168, 13 July 2006.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on the Practices of Witness Familiarisation and Witness Proofing, ICC-01/04-01/06, 8 November 2006.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Tadić, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, ICTY-94-1-AR72, 2 October 1995.Google Scholar

Screws v. United States, 325 US 91 (1945).Google Scholar

Smith v. United States, 431 US 291 (1977).Google Scholar

Winters v. New York, 333 US 507 (1948).Google Scholar

Assembly of States Parties, Elements of Crimes, adopted 9 September 2002, ICC-ASP/1/3 (part II-B).Google Scholar

Coalition for the International Criminal Court, ‘Report of the CICC Team on the Crime of Aggression’ (2005).Google Scholar

‘Final Act of the United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court’, 17 July 1998, UN Doc. A/CONF/183/13.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Fourth Report on the Law of Treaties’, Yb ILC (1965), vol. II, 49.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Guidelines on Reservations to a Provision Reflective a Customary Norm’, Yb ILC (2007), vol. II(2).Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Guide to Practice on Reservations to Treaties with Commentaries’, Yb ILC (2011), vol. II(2), 1.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report on the Work of its Sixty-Third Session (26 April to 3 June and 4 July to 12 August 2011)’, GAOR Supp. No. 10 (A/66/10 and Add.1) 553.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Reports of the International Law Commission on the Second Part of its Seventeenth Session and on its Eighteenth Session’, Yb ILC (1966), vol. II, 169.Google Scholar

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 19 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976), 999 UNTS 171.Google Scholar

Koh, H. H., Statement at the Review Conference of the International Criminal Court, ICC Review Conference, 4 June 2010, available at: www.state.gov/s/l/releases/remarks/142665.htm.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law: Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission’, 4 April 2006, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682.Google Scholar

Preparatory Commission, Working Group on the Crime of Aggression (Secretariat), ‘Historical Review of Developments relating to Aggression’, Parts I and II, 18 and 24 January 2002, UN Doc. PCNICC/2002/WGCA/L.1/Add.1.Google Scholar

Preparatory Committee, ‘Draft Statute for the International Criminal Court’, ‘Report of the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court’ (1998) UN Doc. A/CONF.183/2/Add.1.Google Scholar

United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and their Property (adopted 2 December 2004, not in force), UN Doc. A/RES/59/38, Annex.Google Scholar

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (adopted 23 May 1969, entered into force 27 January 1980), 1155 UNTS 331.Google Scholar

Waldock, H., ‘Sixth Report on the Law of Treaties’, Yb ILC (1966), vol. II, 51.Google Scholar

Waldron, J., ‘The Concept and the Rule of Law’, Paper read at the NYU Colloquium in Legal, Political and Social Theory, 14 September 2006 (on file with author).Google Scholar