Book contents
- The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary
- Crime of Aggression Library
- The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: The Crime of Aggression and the International Legal Order
- Part I History
- 1 The First World War, Wilhelm II and Article 227: The Origin of the Idea of ‘Aggression’ in International Criminal Law
- 2 The Crimes against Peace Precedent
- 3 The Legacy of the Tokyo Dissents on ‘Crimes against Peace’
- 4 The General Assembly’s Definition of the Act of Aggression
- 5 The Practice of the Security Council Regarding the Concept of Aggression
- 6 The International Court of Justice and the Concept of Aggression
- 7 The International Law Commission’s Work on Aggression
- 8 Negotiations on the Rome Statute, 1995–98
- Part II Theory
- Part III Crime of Aggression under Current International Law
- Part IV Crime of Aggression and National Law
- Part V Crime of Aggression and the Future World Order
- Epilogue. The Long Journey to Kampala: A Personal Memoir
- Index
- References
4 - The General Assembly’s Definition of the Act of Aggression
from Part I - History
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2017
By
Book contents
- The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary
- Crime of Aggression Library
- The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: The Crime of Aggression and the International Legal Order
- Part I History
- 1 The First World War, Wilhelm II and Article 227: The Origin of the Idea of ‘Aggression’ in International Criminal Law
- 2 The Crimes against Peace Precedent
- 3 The Legacy of the Tokyo Dissents on ‘Crimes against Peace’
- 4 The General Assembly’s Definition of the Act of Aggression
- 5 The Practice of the Security Council Regarding the Concept of Aggression
- 6 The International Court of Justice and the Concept of Aggression
- 7 The International Law Commission’s Work on Aggression
- 8 Negotiations on the Rome Statute, 1995–98
- Part II Theory
- Part III Crime of Aggression under Current International Law
- Part IV Crime of Aggression and National Law
- Part V Crime of Aggression and the Future World Order
- Epilogue. The Long Journey to Kampala: A Personal Memoir
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Crime of AggressionA Commentary, pp. 142 - 177Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Primary Sources
Barriga, S. and Kreß, C., The Travaux Préparatories of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Broms, B., The Definition of Aggression in the United Nations (Turku: Turun Yliopisto, 1968).Google Scholar
Bruha, T., Die Definition Aggression. Faktizität und Normativität des UN-Konsensbildungsprozesses der Jahre 1968 bis 1974 zugleich ein Beitrag zur Strukturanalyse des Völkerrechts (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1980).Google Scholar
Ferencz, B. B., Defining International Aggression. The Search for World Peace. A Documentary History and Analysis (2 vols., New York: Oceana Publications, 1975).Google Scholar
McDougall, C., The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Nyiri, N., The United Nations Search for a Definition of Aggression (New York: Peter Lang, 1989).Google Scholar
Stone, J., Conflict through Consensus: United Nations Approaches to Aggression (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Akram, S. M. and Link, M., ‘Arab Isareli Conflict’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated May 2011).Google Scholar
Barriga, S., ‘Negotiating the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression’ in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatories of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 3–57.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. C. and Ferencz, B. B., ‘The Crime against Peace and Aggression: From its Origins to the ICC’, in Bassiouni, M. C., International Criminal Law, vol. 3 (3 vols., Leiden: Nijhoff, 2008), 207–42.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., ‘Aggression’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated September 2015).Google Scholar
Hofmann, R., ‘Annexation’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated February 2013).Google Scholar
Keller, H., ‘Friendly Relations Declaration (1970)’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated June 2009).Google Scholar
McDonald, A. and Bruha, T., ‘Bombardment’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated May 2011).Google Scholar
Oeter, S., ‘Das Verbrechen der Aggression, die Konferenz von Kampala und das deutsche Strafrecht’, in Jeßberger, F. and Geneuss, J. (eds.), Zehn Jahre Völkerstrafgesetzbuch. Bilanz und Perspektiven eines ‘deutschen Völkerstrafrechts’ (Baden-Baden: Nomos & Stämpfli, 2013), 101–25.Google Scholar
Schorkopf, F., ‘Versailles Peace Treaty (1919)’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated October 2010).Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C., ‘Die Arbeit der ILC im Bereich des materiellen Völkerstrafrechts’, in Hankel, G. and Stuby, G. (eds.), Strafgerichte gegen Menschheitsverbrechen: zum Völkerstrafrecht 50 Jahre nach den Nürnberger Prozessen (Hamburg: Hamburger Edition HIS Verlagsges, 1995), 270–94.Google Scholar
Walter, C., ‘Postscript: Self-Determination, Secession, and the Crimean Crisis 2014’, in Walter, C., von Ungern-Sternberg, A. and Abushov, K. (eds.), Self-Determination and Secession in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2014), 293–311.Google Scholar
Willms, B., ‘Zur Dialektik von Kooperation und Abgrenzung im Entspannungsprozess zwischen Ost und West’, in Zellentin, G. (ed.), Annäherung, Abgrenzung und friedlicher Wandel in Europa (Boppard am Rhein: Boldt, 1976), 45–78.Google Scholar
Woltag, J. C., ‘Cyber Warfare’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated May 2015).Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘Use of Force, Prohibition of Threat’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated June 2013).Google Scholar
Ambos, K., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala’, German Yearbook of International Law, 53 (2010), 463–509.Google Scholar
Bothe, M., ‘Die Erklärung der Generalversammlung der Vereinten Nationen über die Definition der Aggression’, Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht, 18 (1975), 127–45.Google Scholar
Ferencz, B. B., ‘Enabling the International Criminal Court to Punish Aggression’, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 6 (2007), 551–66.Google Scholar
Glennon, M. J., ‘The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression’, Yale Journal of International Law, 35 (2010), 71–114.Google Scholar
Garvey, J. I., ‘The UN Definition of Aggression: Law and Illusion in the Context of Collective Security’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 17 (1976–77), 177–99.Google Scholar
Hofmeister, H., ‘Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam: eine Analyse des völkerrechtlichen Gewaltanwendungsverbots’ (‘An Analysis of the Ban on the Threat of Force under the Law of Nations’), Archiv des Völkerrechts, 48 (2010), 248–65.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1129–46.Google Scholar
Paulus, A., ‘Second Thoughts on the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1117–28.Google Scholar
Sahovic, M., ‘Codification des principes du droit international des relations amicales et de la coopération entre les Etats’, Recueil de Cours, 137 (1972), 243–310.Google Scholar
Stone, J., ‘Hopes and Loopholes in the 1974 Definition of Aggression’, American Journal of International Law, 71 (1977), 224–46.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), ICJ Reports (2007), 43.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), Judgment, ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment, ICJ Reports (1986), 14.Google Scholar
Case Concerning the Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schwebel, ICJ Reports (1986), 259.Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Tadić, Appeal Judgment, ICTY-IT-94-1-A., 15 July 1999.Google Scholar
USA v. Weizsäcker et al. (the Ministries case), Case No. 11, Military Tribunal IV.Google Scholar
Declaration of Principles (Atlantic Charter) (signed and entered into force 14 August 1941) 204 LNTS 384.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Establishment of an International Law Commission, 21 November 1947, UN Doc. A/RES/174(II).Google Scholar
General Assembly, Need to Expedite the Drafting of a Definition of Aggression in the Light of the Present International Situation, 18 December 1967, UN Doc. A/RES/2330(XXII).Google Scholar
General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 20 December 1952, UN Doc. A/RES/688(VII).Google Scholar
General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 4 December 1954, UN Doc. A/RES/895(IX).Google Scholar
General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 29 November 1957, UN Doc. A/RES/1181(XII).Google Scholar
General Assembly, ‘Report of the Sixth Committee’, UN Doc. A/6988.Google Scholar
General Assembly, ‘Report of the Special Committee on the Question of Defining Aggression’, UN Doc. A/AC.66/L.11 (1953).Google Scholar
General Assembly, ‘Report of the Special Committee on the Question of Defining Aggression’, UN GAOR, 26th Session, Supp. No. 19, UN Doc. A/8419, Annex II.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 31 January 1952, UN Doc. A/RES/599(VI).Google Scholar
General Assembly, ‘Six Power Draft’, UN Doc. A/AC. 134/L. 17 and Add. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
General Assembly, ‘The Soviet Draft Definition of Aggression’, UN Doc. A/AC. 134/L. 12.Google Scholar
General Assembly, ‘Thirteen Power Draft’, UN Doc. A/AC. 134/L. 16 and Add. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
General Assembly, ‘Twenty-six Power Draft Resolution’, UN Doc. A/C. 6/L.644.Google Scholar
General Treaty for Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy (signed 27 August 1928, entered into force on 25 July 1929), 94 LNTS 57.Google Scholar
Letter of the Soviet Foreign Minister Gromyko, 22 September 1967, UN Doc. A/6833.Google Scholar
Security Council, Resolution 667 (1990) concerning the situation between Iraq and Kuwait, 16 September 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/667.Google Scholar
Spiropoulos, J., ‘Formulation of the Nuremberg Principles’, UN Doc. A/CN. 4/22, Yb ILC (1950), vol. II, 181.Google Scholar
Treaty of Mutual Guarantee between Germany, Belgium, France, Great Britain and Italy (signed 16 October 1925, entered into force 14 September 1926).Google Scholar
Treaty of Peace between Allied and Associated Powers and Germany (adopted 28 June 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920).Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by