Appleman, J. A., Military Tribunals and International Crimes (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merril, 1954).Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., International Law and the Use of Force by States (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Crawford, J., The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. and Wilmshurst, E., An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 3rd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Ferencz, B. B., Defining International Aggression: The Search for World Peace: A Documentary History and Analysis, vol. I (2 vols., New York: Oceana, 1975).Google Scholar

Glueck, S., The Nuremberg Trial and Aggressive War (New York: A. A. Knopf, 1946).Google Scholar

Heller, K. J., The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kittichaisaree, K., International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Kemp, G., Individual Criminal Responsibility for the International Crime of Aggression (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010).Google Scholar

May, L., Aggression and Crimes Against Peace (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

McDougall, C., The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

McMahon, M. M., Conquest and Modern International Law: The Legal Limitations on the Acquisition of Territory by Conquest (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1940).Google Scholar

Minear, R. H., Victors’ Justice: The Tokyo War Crimes Trial (Princeton University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Pompe, C. A., Aggressive War: An International Crime (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1953).Google Scholar

Rifaat, A. M., International Aggression: A Study of the Legal Concept (Stockholm: Anqvist & Wiksell, 1979).Google Scholar

Sellars, K., ‘Crimes against Peace’ and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Simpson, J., Law, War and Crime (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Solera, O., Defining the Crime of Aggression (London: Cameron May, 2007).Google Scholar

Stone, J., Aggression and World Order: A Critique of United Nations Theories of Aggression (Sydney: Maitland, 1958).Google Scholar

White, N. D., Keeping the Peace: The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Peace and Security (Manchester University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Against the Odds: the Results of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S., Danspreckguber, W. and Wenaweser, C. (eds.), The Princeton Process on the Crime of Aggression (Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination, Princeton University, 2009), 1–20.Google Scholar

Greppi, E., ‘State Responsibility for Acts of Aggression Under the United Nations Charter: A Review of Cases’, in Bellelli, R. (ed.), International Criminal Law: Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to its Review (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010), 499–518.Google Scholar

Ko, K., ‘The Tokyo Judgment on Crimes against Peace and the Crime of Aggression’, in Universität zu Köln/Japanisches Kulturinstitut (eds.), Beiträge aus dem Symposium Japan and Germany – 150 Years of Cooperation. Dynamics of Traditional Research Societies in a Rapidly Changing World (Munich: Iudicium, 2013), 81–101.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘The Nuremberg Judgment on Crimes against Peace and the Crime of Aggression’, in Universität zu Köln/Japanisches Kulturinstitut (eds.), Beiträge aus dem Symposium Japan and Germany – 150 Years of Cooperation. Dynamics of Traditional Research Societies in a Rapidly Changing World (Munich: Iudicium, 2013), 69–80.Google Scholar

Lukashuk, I. I., ‘International Illegality and Criminality of Aggression’, in Ginsburgs, G. and Kudriavtsev, V. N. (eds.), The Nuremberg Trial and International Law (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1990), 121–53.Google Scholar

McDougall, C., ‘The Crime of Aggression: Born of the Failure of Collective Security – Still Shackled to its Fate? Time to Catch Up or Part Ways’, in Blumenthal, D. A. and McCormack, T. L. H. (eds.), The Legacy of Nuremberg (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007), 131–67.Google Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘Evaluating Domestic Legislation on the Customary Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute’s Complementarity Regime’, in Stahn, C. and Sluiter, G. (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), 725–54.Google Scholar

Simons, W. B., ‘The Jurisdictional Bases of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg’, in Ginsburgs, G. and Kudriavtsev, V. N. (eds.), The Nuremberg Trial and International Law (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1990), 39–59.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C., ‘International Law and the Holocaust’, Californian Western International Law Journal, 9 (1979), 201–305.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C., ‘Nuremberg Forty Years After’, American Society of International Law Proceedings, 80 (1986), 59–68.Google Scholar

Bennett, T. W., ‘A Linguistic Perspective of the Definition of Aggression’, German Yearbook of International Law, 31 (1988), 48–69.Google Scholar

Bial, L., ‘The Nuremberg Judgment and International Law’, Brooklyn Law Review, 13 (1947), 34–49.Google Scholar

Bush, J. A., ‘“The Supreme … Crime” and its Origins: The Lost Legislative History of the Crime of Aggressive War’, Columbia Law Review, 102 (2002), 2324–423.Google Scholar

Carpenter, A. C., ‘The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 64 (1995), 223–42.Google Scholar

Chacko, C. J., ‘International Law and the Concept of Aggression’, Indian Journal of International Law, 3 (1963), 396–412.Google Scholar

Cryer, R., ‘Aggression at the Court of Appeal’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 10(2) (2005), 209–30.Google Scholar

Dawson, G. M., ‘Defining Substantive Crimes within the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court: What is the Crime of Aggression?’, New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law, 19 (2002), 413–52.Google Scholar

DeNicola, C. P., ‘A Shield for the “Knights of Humanity”: The ICC Should Adopt a Humanitarian Necessity Defense to the Crime of Aggression’, University of Philadelphia Journal of International Law, 30 (2008–9), 641–90.Google Scholar

Drumbl, M. A., ‘The Push to Criminalise Aggression: Something Lost Amid the Gains?’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 41 (2009), 291–319.Google Scholar

Ehard, H., ‘The Nuremberg Trial against the Major War Criminals and International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 43 (1949) 223–45.Google Scholar

Finch, G. A., ‘The Nuremberg Tribunal and International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 20–37.Google Scholar

Garcia-Mora, M. R., ‘Crimes against Peace in International Law: From Nuremberg to the Present’, Kentucky Law Journal, 53 (1964–65), 35–55.Google Scholar

Glueck, S., ‘The Nuremberg Trial and Aggressive War’, Harvard Law Review, 59 (1945–6), 396–456.Google Scholar

Greenwood, C., ‘The Concept of War in Modern International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 36 (1987), 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, R. L., ‘International Law, the Crime of Aggression and the Ius Ad Bellum’, International Criminal Law Review, 2 (2002), 301–73.Google Scholar

Heller, K. J., ‘Retreat from Nuremberg: The Leadership Requirement in the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 18(3) (2007), 477–97.Google Scholar

Ireland, G., ‘Ex Post Facto from Rome to Tokyo’, Temple Law Quarterly, 21 (1947–48), 27–61.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., ‘Will the Judgment in the Nuremberg Trial Constitute a Precedent in International Law?’, International Law Quarterly, 1 (1947), 153–71.Google Scholar

King, H. T., ‘The Legacy of Nuremberg’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 34(3) (2002), 335–56.Google Scholar

Kopelman, E. S., ‘Ideology and International Law: The Dissent of the Indian Justice at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial’, New York University Journal of International Law and Policy, 23 (1990–1), 373–444.Google Scholar

Lippman, M., ‘Nuremberg: Forty-Five Years Later’, Connecticut Journal of International Law, 7 (1991–2), 1–64.Google Scholar

Lippman, M., ‘The History, Development and Decline of Crimes against Peace’, George Washington International Law Review, 36 (2004), 957–1056.Google Scholar

Lumb, R. D., ‘Individual Responsibility for Aggressive War: The Crime Against Peace’, University of Queensland Law Journal, 3 (1956–9), 333–55.Google Scholar

MacPherson, B. F., ‘Building an International Criminal Court for the 21st Century’, Connecticut Journal of International Law, 13 (1998), 1–60.Google Scholar

Maogoto, J. N., ‘Aggression Supreme: International Offence Still in Search of a Definition’, Southern Cross University Law Review, 6 (2002), 278–317.Google Scholar

Meron, T., ‘Defining Aggression for the International Criminal Court’, Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 25 (2001), 1–15.Google Scholar

Milanovic, M., ‘Aggression and Legality: Custom in Kampala’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 165–87.Google Scholar

Müller-Schieke, I. K., ‘Defining the Crime of Aggression under the Statute of the International Criminal Court’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 14 (2001), 409–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radin, M., ‘Justice at Nuremberg’, Foreign Affairs, 24(3) (1946), 369–84.Google Scholar

Schachter, O., ‘In Defense of International Rules on the Use of Force’, University of Chicago Law Review, 53 (1986), 113–46.Google Scholar

Schick, F. B., ‘The Nuremberg Trial and the International Law of the Future’, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 770–94.Google Scholar

Schick, F. B., ‘Crimes against Peace’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 38(5) (1948), 445–65.Google Scholar

Schuster, M., ‘The Rome Statute and the Crime of Aggression: A Gordian Knot in Search of a Sword’, Criminal Law Forum, 14(1) (2003), 1–57.Google Scholar

Trahan, J., ‘Defining “Aggression”: Why the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court has Faced such a Conundrum’, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 24 (2002), 439–66.Google Scholar

Wright, Q., ‘The Law of the Nuremberg Trial’, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 38–72.Google Scholar

Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field (signed 22 August 1864, entered into force 22 June 1865), 129 Consol. T.S. 361.Google Scholar

Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (signed 8 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954), 189 UNTS 150.Google Scholar

General Treaty for the Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy (signed 27 August 1928, entered into force 24 July 1929), 94 LNTS 57.Google Scholar

Hague Convention (II) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its Annex (signed 29 July 1899, entered into force 4 September 1900), 1 Bevans 247.Google Scholar

Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land (signed 18 October 1907, entered into force 26 January 1910), UKTS 1910 No. 9.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace Between Allied and Associated Powers and Germany, Peace Treaty of Versailles (signed 28 June 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920), 2 Bevans 43.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Bulgaria (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 41 UNTS 49.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Finland (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 48 UNTS 228.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Hungary (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 41 UNTS 167.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Italy (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 49 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Romania (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 42 UNTS 33.Google Scholar

Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field (signed 22 August 1864, entered into force 22 June 1865), 129 Consol. T.S. 361.Google Scholar

Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (signed 8 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954), 189 UNTS 150.Google Scholar

General Treaty for the Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy (signed 27 August 1928, entered into force 24 July 1929), 94 LNTS 57.Google Scholar

Hague Convention (II) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its Annex (signed 29 July 1899, entered into force 4 September 1900), 1 Bevans 247.Google Scholar

Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land (signed 18 October 1907, entered into force 26 January 1910), UKTS 1910 No. 9.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace Between Allied and Associated Powers and Germany, Peace Treaty of Versailles (signed 28 June 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920), 2 Bevans 43.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Bulgaria (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 41 UNTS 49.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Finland (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 48 UNTS 228.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Hungary (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 41 UNTS 167.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Italy (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 49 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Romania (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 42 UNTS 33.Google Scholar

Government Commissioner of the General Tribunal of the Military Government for the French Zone of Occupation in Germany v. Hermann Roechling et al., Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. XIV (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1951–52).Google Scholar

House of Lords, R v. Jones [2006] UKHL 16.Google Scholar

Supreme National Tribunal of Poland, Case No. 74, Trial of Artur Greiser, Law Reports of War Criminals Selected and Prepared by the United Nations War Crimes Commission (1947).Google Scholar

Chinese War Crimes Military Tribunal of the Ministry of National Defence, Case No. 83, Trial of Takashi Sakai, Law Reports of War Criminals Selected and Prepared by the United Nations War Crimes Commission (1947).Google Scholar

United States et al. v. Hermann Wilhelm Göring et al., International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal (1950).Google Scholar

United States et al. v. Sadao Araki et al., in Pritchard, John R. (ed.), The Tokyo Major War Crimes Trial: The Records of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East with an Authoritative Commentary and Comprehensive Guide (1998).Google Scholar

USA v. Alfried Felix Alwyn Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach et al., Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. IX (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1950).Google Scholar

USA v. Carl Krauch et al., Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vols. VII–VIII (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1952).Google Scholar

USA v. Ernst von Weizsäcker et al., Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vols. XII–XIV (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1951).Google Scholar

USA v. Wilhelm von Leeb et al., Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vols. X–XI (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1951).Google Scholar

Control Council Law No. 10: Punishment of Persons Guilty of War Crimes, Crimes Against Peace and Against Humanity, adopted 20 December 1945, Official Gazette, Control Council for Germany, No. 3, 31 January 1946, 50–55.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on its Second Session’, Yearbook of the International Law Commission (1950), vol. II, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1950/Add.1.Google Scholar

International Military Tribunal, Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1946).Google Scholar

Military Government – Germany, United States Zone, Ordinance No. 7, reproduced in Nuremberg Military Tribunals, Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. I (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1952), xxi–xxvi.Google Scholar

Nuremberg Military Tribunals, Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10 (1952).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Resolution on the Affirmation of the Principles of International Law Recognised by the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal, 11 December 1946, UN Doc. A/RES/95 (1946).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Resolution on the Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1970, UN Doc. A/RES/2625 (1970).Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert H., Report of Robert H. Jackson, United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials, London, 1945 (Washington, DC: United States Department of State, 1949).Google Scholar

United Nations War Crimes Commission, History of the United Nations War Crimes Commission and the Development of the Laws of War (London: HMSO, 1948), 258–59.Google Scholar

Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field (signed 22 August 1864, entered into force 22 June 1865), 129 Consol. T.S. 361.Google Scholar

Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (signed 8 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954), 189 UNTS 150.Google Scholar

General Treaty for the Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy (signed 27 August 1928, entered into force 24 July 1929), 94 LNTS 57.Google Scholar

Hague Convention (II) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its Annex (signed 29 July 1899, entered into force 4 September 1900), 1 Bevans 247.Google Scholar

Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land (signed 18 October 1907, entered into force 26 January 1910), UKTS 1910 No. 9.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace Between Allied and Associated Powers and Germany, Peace Treaty of Versailles (signed 28 June 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920), 2 Bevans 43.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Bulgaria (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 41 UNTS 49.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Finland (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 48 UNTS 228.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Hungary (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 41 UNTS 167.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Italy (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 49 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Romania (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 42 UNTS 33.Google Scholar