The First Republican Losses

Howard L. Reiter; Jeffrey M.  Stonecash

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511779305.005

3 - The First Republican Losses

Democratic Gains in the 1930s

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Howard L. Reiter and

Jeffrey M. Stonecash

Show author details

Howard L. Reiter: Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Jeffrey M. Stonecash: Affiliation:
Syracuse University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

OVERVIEW

From 1900 through 1926, Republicans dominated the Northeast. Democrats did somewhat better in 1928 in the region, and then from 1930 to 1936 they made major gains. While Democrats lost some of those gains by 1940, Republican support never returned to the level that prevailed in 1900–26. The Democratic gains of the 1930s were echoed in the rest of the nation and made the Democrats the national majority party for decades to come.

Why did this first transition occur? Much of the change is attributed to the Great Depression. Republicans were in power when it began in 1929 and in response the electorate blamed them and voted Democratic. However, this was not a simple case of economic events determining change. The transformation in the Northeast was also a product of party strategies. Parties make choices and create identities and that affects whom they attract or lose. The Northeast had undergone significant social change, becoming more urban and populated by immigrants. The Democratic Party, with some internal conflict, was trying to respond to these social trends and make inroads into the region. They had a long-term goal of bringing industrial workers, city dwellers, and immigrants and their descendants into the party. The Great Depression finally brought them those groups, but then Roosevelt had to work to retain them. The party enjoyed some modest gains among these groups even in the 1920s, but not to the level that occurred in the 1930s.

Type: Chapter
Information: Counter Realignment
Political Change in the Northeastern United States
, pp. 32 - 54

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779305.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burnham, Walter Dean, Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics (New York: W.W. Norton, 1970)Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R., Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Stonecash, Jeffrey M. and Silina, Everita, “The 1896 Realignment: A Reassessment,” American Politics Research 33 (January 2005): 3–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Sanders, Elizabeth, Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State, 1877–1917 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), 340–408Google Scholar

Cohen, Lizabeth, Making a New Deal: Industrial Workers in Chicago, 1919–1939 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Andersen, Kristi, The Creation of a Democratic Majority 1928–1936 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979)Google Scholar

Burner, David, The Politics of Provincialism: The Democratic Party in Transition 1918–1932 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1968)Google Scholar

Degler, Carl N., “American Political Parties and the Rise of the Cities: An Interpretation,” Journal of American History 51 (June 1964), 48CrossRef Google Scholar

Plotke, David, Building a Democratic Political Order: Reshaping American Liberalism in the 1930s and 1940s (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 82–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Ware, Alan, The Democratic Party Heads North, 1877–1962 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 156–157CrossRef Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Arthur, Jr., The Age of Roosevelt (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1957)Google Scholar

Badger, Anthony J., The New Deal: The Depression Years (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1989), 41–54CrossRef Google Scholar

Amenta, Edwin, Bold Relief: Institutional Politics and the Origins of Modern American Social Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Stonecash, Jeffrey M., Parties Matter: Realignment and the Return of Partisan Behavior (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2006), 137–143Google Scholar

Degler, Carl, “American Political Parties and the Rise of the Cities: An Interpretation,” Journal of American History 51 (June 1964), 41–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Eldersveld, Samuel J., “The Influence of Metropolitan Party Pluralities in Presidential Elections since 1920: A Study of Twelve Key Cities,” American Political Science Review 43 (December 1949), 1189–1206CrossRef Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr., The Politics of Upheaval (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1960)Google Scholar

Weatherford, M. Stephen, “After the Critical Election: Presidential Leadership, Competition and the Consolidation of the New Deal Realignment,” British Journal of Political Science, 32, no. 2 (April, 2002), 221–257CrossRef Google Scholar

Gordon, Rita Werner, “The Change in the Political Alignment of Chicago's Negroes During the New Deal,” The Journal of American History, 56, no. 3 (December, 1969), 584–603CrossRef Google Scholar

Weed, Clyde P., The Nemesis of Reform: The Republican Party During the New Deal (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Best, Gary Dean, Herbert Hoover: The Postpresidential Years 1933–1964: Volume 1: 1933–1945 (Stanford, CA: The Hoover Institution Press, 1983), 8–9Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard, Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Fairlie, Henry, The Parties: Republicans and Democrats in This Century (New York: Pocket Books, 1978), 36–37Google Scholar

Patterson, James T., Congressional Conservatism and the New Deal: The Growth of the Conservative Coalition in Congress, 1933–1939 (Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press, 1967)Google Scholar

Gerring, John, Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996 (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRef Google Scholar

James, Scott C., Presidents, Parties, and the State: A Party System Perspective on Democratic Regulatory Choice, 1884–1936 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 200–266CrossRef Google Scholar

Tugwell, R. G., The Brains Trust (New York: Viking Press, 1968), 105Google Scholar

Wells, John A., ed., Thomas E. Dewey on the Two-Party System (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co., Inc., 1966), 9Google Scholar

Kirk, Russell, and James McClellan, The Political Principles of Robert A. Taft (New York: Fleet Press Corp., 1967), 52Google Scholar

Book contents

3 - The First Republican Losses

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive