Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on the contributors
- Editors' preface
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Part I Introduction
- Part II History
- Part III Comparative Law
- 4 The metamorphosis of contrefaçon in French copyright law
- 5 A common lawyer's perspective on contrefaçon
- Part IV Economics
- Part V Linguistics
- Part VI Computer software
- Part VII Information studies
- Part VIII Literature
- Part IX Art
- Part X Sociology/music
- Part XI Criminology
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
4 - The metamorphosis of contrefaçon in French copyright law
from Part III - Comparative Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 November 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on the contributors
- Editors' preface
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Part I Introduction
- Part II History
- Part III Comparative Law
- 4 The metamorphosis of contrefaçon in French copyright law
- 5 A common lawyer's perspective on contrefaçon
- Part IV Economics
- Part V Linguistics
- Part VI Computer software
- Part VII Information studies
- Part VIII Literature
- Part IX Art
- Part X Sociology/music
- Part XI Criminology
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
In French copyright law, contrefaçon consists of the infringement of any of the author's rights. As the only basis for a remedy for the violation of French droit d'auteur, contrefaçon originally lacked a broad scope. The expansion of contrefaçon is a relatively recent development, which is now being challenged by offences committed by the general public.
In the past, the general public associated contrefaçon exclusively with the sale of counterfeit goods of luxury brands. The media regularly echoed this narrow interpretation. It is only recently that the contrefaçon of works of authorship has been in the media spotlight. The general public has grown increasingly aware that downloading movies or songs without authorization is illegal. In 2006, a large part of French public opinion demanded the freedom to download, in other words, the end of contrefaçon on the Internet – at least as applied to non-commercial users. In summary, because the public understands contrefaçon to entail the penalty of either a monetary fine or the threat of imprisonment, public opinion considers actions for contrefaçon to impede free access to culture and to marginalize young people. The concept of contrefaçon is clearly undergoing an unprecedented crisis of legitimacy. This phenomenon however appears specific to droit d'auteur. In contrast, the sanctions associated with trade mark and patent infringements are not being challenged; in fact the European Union does not hesitate to describe these infringements as a kind of international organized crime.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Copyright and PiracyAn Interdisciplinary Critique, pp. 55 - 79Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
- 1
- Cited by