Book contents
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Contested collisions
- Part I Between collisions and interaction
- 1 Regime collisions from a perspective of global constitutionalism
- 2 How to avoid regime collisions
- 3 Regime-interplay management
- 4 Responsive legal pluralism
- Part II Addressing collisions
- Part III Collisions otherwise
- Index
- References
4 - Responsive legal pluralism
The emergence of transnational conflicts law*
from Part I - Between collisions and interaction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2016
Book contents
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Contested collisions
- Part I Between collisions and interaction
- 1 Regime collisions from a perspective of global constitutionalism
- 2 How to avoid regime collisions
- 3 Regime-interplay management
- 4 Responsive legal pluralism
- Part II Addressing collisions
- Part III Collisions otherwise
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Contested Regime CollisionsNorm Fragmentation in World Society, pp. 109 - 136Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Alford, R. P., ‘The Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: International Adjudication in Ascendance’, American Society of International Law Proceedings, 94 (2000), pp. 160–5.Google Scholar
Alford, R. P., ‘Federal Courts, International Tribunals, and the Continuum of Deference’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 43 (2003), pp. 675–796.Google Scholar
Amar, A. R., ‘Of Sovereignty and Federalism’, Yale Law Journal, 96 (1987), pp. 1425–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzilotti, D., Corso di diritto internazionale, 3rd edn, 3 vols. (Rome: Athenaeum, 1928).Google Scholar
Arai-Takahashi, Y., The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002).Google Scholar
Archibugi, D., The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy (Princeton University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, E., Political Thought in England: From Herbert Spencer to the Present Day (London: Williams and Norgate, 1915).Google Scholar
Berman, H. J., Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Berman, P. S., ‘Judges as Cosmopolitan Transnational Actors’, Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law, 12 (2004), pp. 109–21.Google Scholar
Berman, P. S., ‘Conflict of Laws, Globalization, and Cosmopolitan Pluralism’, Wayne Law Review, 51 (2005), pp. 1105–45.Google Scholar
Berman, P. S., ‘Towards a Cosmopolitan Vision of Conflict of Laws: Redefining Governmental Interest in a Global Era’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 153 (2005), pp. 1819–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, P. S., ‘The New Legal Pluralism’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5 (2009), pp. 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, P. S., Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders (Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besselink, L. F. M., ‘National and Constitutional Identity Before and After Lisbon’, Utrecht Law Review, 6 (2010), pp. 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, S., ‘European Legal Pluralism after Kadi’, European Constitutional Law Review, 5 (2009), pp. 237–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bogdandy, A., and Schill, S., ‘Overcoming Absolute Primacy: Respect for National Identity under the Lisbon Treaty’, Common Market Law Review, 48 (2011), pp. 1417–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, J., Democracy across Borders: From Dêmos to Dêmoi (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauch, J. A., ‘The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law’, Columbia Journal of European Law, 11 (2005), pp. 113–50.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, T., ‘The Evolving International Human Rights System’, American Journal of International Law, 100 (2006), pp. 783–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke-White, W. W., ‘Proactive Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome System of International Justice’, Harvard International Law Journal, 49 (2008), pp. 53–108.Google Scholar
Calliess, G.-P., ‘Transnational Civil Regimes: Economic Globalisation and the Evolution of Commercial Law’ in Gessner, V. (ed.), Contractual Certainty in International Trade: Empirical Studies and Theoretical Debates on Institutional Support for Global Economic Exchanges (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009), pp. 215–38.Google Scholar
Carozza, P. G., ‘Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law’, American Journal of International Law, 97 (2003), pp. 38–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, D. Z., The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization: Legitimacy, Democracy, and Community in the International Trading System (Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, S., I tribunali di Babele: i giudici alla ricerca di un nuovo ordine globale (Rome: Donzelli, 2009).Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S., ‘Free Trade, Fair Trade, Green Trade: Defogging the Debate’, Cornell International Law Journal, 27 (1994), pp. 459–525.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. P., ‘The ICANN Experiment’, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 12 (2004), pp. 409–48.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A., ‘Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Sceptic’s View’ in Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordón, C. (eds.), Democracy’s Edges (Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M., Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World, Norberg, N. trans. (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, G. B., ‘A New Copyright Order: Why National Courts Should Create Global Norms’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 149 (2000), pp. 469–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, W. S., ‘The Public-Private Distinction in the Conflict of Laws’, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 18 (2008), pp. 371–94.Google Scholar
El Zeidy, M. M., ‘The Principle of Complementarity: A New Machinery to Implement International Criminal Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 23 (2002), pp. 869–975.Google Scholar
Eleftheriadis, P., ‘Pluralism and Integrity’, Ratio Juris, 23 (2010), pp. 365–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, E. O., The Unfinished Democratization of Europe (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, R. A., ‘The Pathways of Global Constitutionalism’, in Falk, R. A., Johansen, R. C. and Kim, S. S. (eds.), The Constitutional Foundations of World Peace (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993), pp. 13–38.Google Scholar
Fassbender, B., ‘The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 (1998), pp. 529–619.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 25 (2004), pp. 999–1046.Google Scholar
Føllesdal, A., ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in International Law’, Global Constitutionalism, 2 (2013), pp. 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froomkin, A. M., ‘Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA and the Constitution’, Duke Law Journal, 50 (2000), pp. 17–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froomkin, A. M., ‘ICANN’s “Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy”: Causes and (Partial) Cures’, Brooklyn Law Review, 67 (2002), pp. 605–718.Google Scholar
Gaja, G., ‘The Review by the European Court of Human Rights of Member States’ Acts Implementing European Union Law: “Solange” Yet Again?’ in Dupuy, P.-M. et al. (eds.), Common Values in International Law: Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat (Kehl: Engel, 2006), pp. 517–26.Google Scholar
Garlicki, L., ‘Cooperation of Courts: The Role of Supranational Jurisdictions in Europe’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6 (2008), pp. 509–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerards, J., ‘Pluralism, Deference and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’, European Law Journal, 17 (2011), pp. 80–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Gierke, O., Political Theories of the Middle Age, Maitland, F. W. trans. (Cambridge University Press, 1900).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. L., and Posner, E. A., The Limits of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, J., ‘What Is Legal Pluralism?’, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 24 (1986), pp. 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D., ‘The Achievement of Constitutionalism and Its Prospects in a Changed World’ in Dobner, P. and Loughlin, M. (eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günther, K., ‘Legal Pluralism or Uniform Concept of Law? Globalisation as a Problem of Legal Theory’, No Foundations, 5 (2008), pp. 5–21.Google Scholar
Guzman, A. T., How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Rehg, W. trans. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., ‘A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society?’ in Habermas, J., Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays, Cronin, C. trans. (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008), pp. 312–52.Google Scholar
Hafner, G., ‘Pros and Cons Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 25 (2004), pp. 849–63.Google Scholar
Halberstam, D., ‘Local, Global and Plural Constitutionalism: Europe Meets the World’ in de Búrca, G. and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 150–202.Google Scholar
Halberstam, D., and Stein, E., ‘The United Nations, the European Union, and the King of Sweden: Economic Sanctions and Individual Rights in a Plural World Order’, Common Market Law Review, 46 (2009), pp. 13–72.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., ‘The Federalist No. 9’ in Cooke, J. E. (ed.), The Federalist (Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1961), pp. 50–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauriou, M., ‘La théorie de l’institution et de la fondation: essai de vitalisme social’, Cahiers de la nouvelle journée, 4 (1925), pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
Held, D., Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Helfer, L. R., and Dinwoodie, G. B., ‘Designing Non-National Systems: The Case of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy’, William and Mary Law Review, 43 (2001), pp. 141–274.Google Scholar
Hooker, M. B., Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonial Laws (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H., Sovereignty, the WTO, and Changing Fundamentals of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, V. C., Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Jacqué, J.-P., ‘L’arrêt Bosphorus, une jurisprudence “Solange II” de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme?’, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen, 41 (2005), pp. 756–67.Google Scholar
Jellinek, G., Die rechtliche Natur der Staatenverträge: Ein Beitrag zur juristischen Construction des Völkerrechts (Vienna: Hölder, 1880).Google Scholar
Joerges, C., ‘A New Type of Conflicts Law as the Legal Paradigm of the Postnational Constellation’ in Joerges, C. and Falke, J. (eds.), Karl Polanyi, Globalisation and the Potential of Law in Transnational Markets (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011), pp. 465–501.Google Scholar
Joerges, C., and Neyer, J., ‘From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology’, European Law Journal, 3 (1997), pp. 273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H., Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts: Beitrag zu einer reinen Rechtslehre, 2nd edn (Tübingen: Mohr, 1928).Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., ‘One, Two, Three, Many Legal Orders: Legal Pluralism and the Cosmopolitan Dream’, New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 31 (2007), pp. 641–59.Google Scholar
Knop, K., Michaels, R., and Riles, A., ‘International Law in Domestic Courts: A Conflict of Laws Approach’, American Society of International Law Proceedings, 103 (2009), pp. 269–74.Google Scholar
Knop, K., Michaels, R., and Riles, A., ‘From Multiculturalism to Technique: Feminism, Culture, and the Conflict of Laws Style’, Stanford Law Review, 64 (2012), pp. 589–656.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., and Leino, P., ‘Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 15 (2002), pp. 553–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N., ‘The Open Architecture of European Human Rights Law’, Modern Law Review, 71 (2008), pp. 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N., Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N., ‘Who Is Afraid of Radical Pluralism? Legal Order and Political Stability in the Postnational Space’, Ratio Juris, 24 (2011), pp. 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M., ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State’ in Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman, J. P. (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 258–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M., ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: An Integrated Conception of Public Law’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 605–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laband, P., Das Staatsrecht des Deutschen Reiches, 5th edn, 4 vols. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1911–1914).Google Scholar
Ladeur, K.-H., ‘Globalization and the Conversion of Democracy to Polycentric Networks: Can Democracy Survive the End of the Nation-State?’ in Ladeur, K.-H. (ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 89–118.Google Scholar
Lanier, E. R., ‘Solange, Farewell: The Federal German Constitutional Court and the Recognition of the Court of Justice of the European Communities as Lawful Judge’, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 11 (1988), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Laski, H. J., ‘The Personality of Associations’, Harvard Law Review, 29 (1916), pp. 404–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laski, H. J., ‘The Sovereignty of the State’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 13 (1916), pp. 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavranos, N., ‘The Solange-Method as a Tool for Regulating Competing Jurisdictions among International Courts and Tribunals’, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 30 (2008), pp. 275–334.Google Scholar
Legg, A., The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G., ‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26 (2006), pp. 705–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G., ‘Harmonic Law: The Case Against Pluralism’ in Dickson, J. and Eleftheriadis, P. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 77–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovric, D., ‘A Constitution Friendly to International Law: Germany and Its Völerrechtsfreundlichkeit’, Australian Yearbook of International Law, 25 (2006), pp. 75–104.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, A. F., ‘Public Law in the International Arena: Conflict of Laws, International Law, and Some Suggestions for Their Interaction’, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international, 163 (1979-II), pp. 311–445.Google Scholar
Lübbe-Wolff, G., ‘How Can the European Court of Human Rights Reinforce the Role of National Courts in the Convention System?’, Human Rights Law Journal, 32 (2012), pp. 11–15.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., A Sociological Theory of Law, King, E. and Albrow, M. trans. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., ‘Some Problems with “Reflexive Law”’ in Teubner, G. and Febbrajo, A. (eds.), State, Law, and Economy as Autopoietic Systems: Regulation and Autonomy in a New Perspective (Milan: Giuffrè, 1992), pp. 389–415.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Law as a Social System, Ziegert, K. A. trans. (Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N., Theory of Society, Barrett, R. trans., 2 vols. (Stanford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Macaulay, S., ‘Private Government’ in Lipson, L. and Wheeler, S. (eds.), Law and the Social Sciences (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1986), pp. 445–518.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N., ‘Risking Constitutional Collision in Europe?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18 (1998), pp. 517–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, J., ‘The Federalist No. 39’ in Cooke, J. E. (ed.), The Federalist (Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1961), pp. 250–7.Google Scholar
McGoldrick, D., The Human Rights Committee: Its Role in the Development of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Mehren, A. T., ‘Special Substantive Rules for Multistate Problems: Their Role and Significance in Contemporary Choice of Law Methodology’, Harvard Law Review, 88 (1974), pp. 347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelman, F. I., ‘W(h)ither the Constitution?’, Cardozo Law Review, 21 (2000), pp. 1063–83.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A., National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonet, P., and Selznick, P., Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law (New York: Harper and Row, 1978).Google Scholar
Nye, J. S. Jr., The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Pastor Ridruejo, J. A., ‘Le principe de subsidiarité dans la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme’ in Bröhmer, J. et al. (eds.), Internationale Gemeinschaft und Menschenrechte: Festschrift für Georg Ress zum 70. Geburtstag (Cologne: Heymanns, 2005), pp. 1077–83.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J., Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pernice, I., ‘The Global Dimension of Multilevel Constitutionalism: A Legal Response to the Challenges of Globalisation’ in Dupuy, P.-M. et al. (eds.), Common Values in International Law: Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat (Kehl: Engel, 2006), pp. 973–1005.Google Scholar
Peters, A., ‘The Merits of Global Constitutionalism’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 16 (2009), pp. 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U., ‘Time for a United Nations “Global Compact” for Integrating Human Rights into the Law of Worldwide Organizations: Lessons from European Integration’, European Journal of International Law, 13 (2002), pp. 621–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petzold, H., ‘The Convention and the Principle of Subsidiarity’ in Macdonald, R. St. J., Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1993), pp. 41–62.Google Scholar
Poiares Maduro, M., ‘Three Claims of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Avbelj, M. and Komárek, J. (eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012), pp. 67–84.Google Scholar
Pospíšil, L., Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory (New York: Harper and Row, 1971).Google Scholar
Rabkin, J. A., Law without Nations? Why Constitutional Government Requires Sovereign States (Princeton University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, C. P. R., ‘The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 31 (1999), pp. 709–51.Google Scholar
Romano, S., L’ordinamento giuridico: studi sul concetto, le fonti e i caratteri del diritto (Pisa: Spoerri, 1918).Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, J., ‘Unilateralism and Constitutionalism’, New York University Law Review, 79 (2004), pp. 1971–2028.Google Scholar
von Savigny, F. C., System des heutigen Römischen Rechts, 8 vols. (Berlin: Veit, 1849).Google Scholar
Scelle, G., Précis de droit des gens: principes et systématique, 2 vols. (Paris: Sirey, 1932–1934).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., Constitutional Theory, J. Seitzer trans. (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Schultz, T., ‘Secondary Rules of Recognition and Relative Legality in Transnational Regimes’, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 56 (2011), pp. 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selznick, P., Law, Society, and Industrial Justice (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969).Google Scholar
Shany, Y., ‘Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?’, European Journal of International Law, 16 (2005), pp. 907–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, D., ‘Subsidiarity and Human Rights Law’, Human Rights Law Journal, 27 (2006), pp. 4–11.Google Scholar
Simma, B., ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law’, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international, 250 (1994-VI), pp. 217–384.Google Scholar
Simma, B., and Pulkowski, D., ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 17 (2006), pp. 483–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M., ‘A Global Community of Courts’, Harvard International Law Journal, 44 (2003), pp. 191–219.Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, B., Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation, 2nd edn (London: Butterworths, 2002).Google Scholar
Stein, E., ‘Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution’, American Journal of International Law, 75 (1981), pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Story, J., Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws, Foreign and Domestic: In Regard to Contracts, Rights, and Remedies, and Especially in Regard to Marriages, Divorces, Wills, Successions, and Judgments (Boston: Hilliard, Gray and Company, 1834).Google Scholar
Sweeney, J. A., ‘A “Margin of Appreciation” in the Internal Market: Lessons from the European Court of Human Rights’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 34 (2007), pp. 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’, Law and Society Review, 17 (1983), pp. 239–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society’ in Teubner, G. (ed.), Global Law without a State (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1997), pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Global Private Regimes: Neo-Spontaneous Law and Dual Constitution of Autonomous Sectors?’ in Ladeur, K.-H. (ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 71–87.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’, Modern Law Review, 69 (2006), pp. 327–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., and Karavas, V., ‘www.CompanyNameSucks.com: The Horizontal Effect of Fundamental Rights on “Private Parties” within Autonomous Internet Law’, Constellations, 12 (2005), pp. 262–82.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., and Korth, P., ‘Two Kinds of Legal Pluralism: Collision of Transnational Regimes in the Double Fragmentation of World Society’ in Young, M. A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Tocqueville, A., Democracy in America, H. C. Mansfield and D. Winthrop trans. (University of Chicago Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, J. P., The Future of International Law: Global Government (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A., ‘Judicial Dialogue in Multi-Level Governance: The Impact of the Solange Argument’ in Fauchald, O. K. and Nollkaemper, A. (eds.), The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012), pp. 185–215.Google Scholar
Viellechner, L., ‘The Constitution of Transnational Governance Arrangements: Karl Polanyi’s Double Movement in the Transformation of Law’ in Joerges, C. and Falke, J. (eds.), Karl Polanyi, Globalisation and the Potential of Law in Transnational Markets (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011), pp. 435–64.Google Scholar
Voßkuhle, A., ‘Multilevel Cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts: Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund’, European Constitutional Law Review, 6 (2010), pp. 175–98.Google Scholar
Waitz, G., ‘Das Wesen des Bundesstaates’, Allgemeine Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft und Literatur, 4 (1853), pp. 494–530.Google Scholar
Walker, N., ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’, Modern Law Review, 65 (2002), pp. 317–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H., ‘The Transformation of Europe’, Yale Law Journal, 100 (1991), pp. 2403–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellens, K. C., ‘Diversity in Secondary Rules and the Unity of International Law: Some Reflections on Current Trends’, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 25 (1994), pp. 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willke, H., ‘Societal Guidance through Law?’ in Teubner, G. and Febbrajo, A. (eds.), State, Law, and Economy as Autopoietic Systems: Regulation and Autonomy in a New Perspective (Milan: Giuffrè, 1992), pp. 353–88.Google Scholar
Yntema, H. E., ‘The Comity Doctrine’, Michigan Law Review, 65 (1966), pp. 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziller, J., ‘The German Constitutional Court’s Friendliness towards European Law: On the Judgment of Bundesverfassungsgericht over the Ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon’, European Public Law, 16 (2010), pp. 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar