1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved December 30, 2006 from www.chanrobles.com/philsupremelaw1.htm.Google Scholar

Abdullah, Kamsiah 2010. Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu di Singapura. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Google Scholar

Abidi, Syed Amir Hasan and Gargesh, Ravinder 2008. Persian in South Asia, in Kachru, Braj B., Kachru, Yamuna and Sridhar, S. N. (eds.), Language in South Asia, pp. 103–20. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

ACARA 2013. Cross-Curriculum Priorities. Retrieved April 30, 2014 from www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/cross_curriculum_priorities.html.Google Scholar

Adab in Islam 2007. What Is Adab? Retrieved May 20, 2014 from https://adabinislam.wordpress.com/adab/.Google Scholar

Adams, Corinne 1979. English Speech Rhythm and the Foreign Learner. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agha, Saira 2012. Planet 94 launched in Lahore, Daily Times [English daily]. Retrieved November 18, 2015 from http://archives.dailytimes.com.pk/infotainment/27-Aug-2012/planet-fm-94-launched-in-lahore.Google Scholar

Agrawal, Kirtee 2010. The hazards of nativism, in Stilz, Gerhard and Dengel-Janic, Ellen (eds.), South Asian Literatures, p. 206. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar

Ahmad, Aijaz 1993. Indian literature: notes towards the definition of a category, in Ahmad, Aijaz (ed.), In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures, pp. 243–83. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ahmad, Zainul Abidin Bin 1927. Pair words in Malay, Journal of the Malayan Branch Royal Asiatic Society 5(2): 324–38.Google Scholar

Aikant, Satish C. 1997. English in India: the discursive formation, in Singh, Ram Sewak and Singh, Charu Sheel (eds.), Spectrum History of Indian Literature in English, pp. 1–19. New Delhi: Atlantic Publications.Google Scholar

Akagi, Akio 1980. Rangaku no Jidai (The Age of Dutch Studies). Tokyo: Chuokoronsha.Google Scholar

Akami, Tomoko and Milner, Anthony 2013. Australia in the Asia-Pacific region, in Bashford, Alison and Macintyre, Stuart (eds.), The Cambridge History of Australia, pp. 537–60. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Alisjahbana, Takdir S. 1974. Language policy, language engineering and literacy in Indonesia and Malaysia, in Joshua, Fishman (ed.), Advances in Language Planning, pp. 391–416. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, William 1953. Phonetics in Ancient India. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alpatov, Vladimir M. 2000. 150 Yazykov i Politika. Sotsiolingvisticheskiye Problemy SSSR i Postsovetskogo Prostranstva. 1917–2000 (150 Languages and Politics. Sociolinguistic Issues in the USSR and Post-Soviet Space. 1917–2000. In Russian). Moscow: Kraft, Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Alsagoff, Lubna 2010. Hybridity in ways of speaking: the globalization of English in Singapore, in Lim, Lisa, Pakir, Anne and Wee, Lionel (eds.), English in Singapore: Modernity and Management, pp. 109–30. Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar

Alsagoff, Lubna 2012. The development of English in Singapore: language policy and planning in nation building, in Low, Ee-Ling and Hashim, Azirah (eds.), English in Southeast Asia: Features, Policy and Language in Use, pp. 137–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Aminov, K., Jensen, V., Juraev, S., Overland, I., Tyan, D., and Uulu, Y. 2010. Language use and language policy in Central Asia. [Central Asia Regional Data Review, Vol. 2, No. 1]. Retrieved December 26, 2013 from www.osce-academy.net/upload/file/language_use_and_language_policy_in_central_asia.pdf.Google Scholar

Anand, Mulk Raj 2000. Many languages but one literature: a retrospective on Indian writing, in Narasimhaiah, C. D (ed.), Makers of Indian English Literature, p. 36. New Delhi: Pencraft.Google Scholar

Anwei, Feng and Adamson, Bob (in press). Trilingualism and Trilingual Education in China. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Arefyev, Аlexandre L. 2012. Russkiy Yazyk na Rubezhe XX–XXI Vekov (The Russian Language at the Turn of the 20th–21st Centuries. In Russian). Moscow: Centre for social forecasting and marketing. Retrieved December 7, 2013 from www.civisbook.ru/files/File/russkij_yazyk.pdf.Google Scholar

Ariff, Syed Umar 2013. Shisha “HARAM”. NO SMOKING OR SELLING: fatwa committee head says it is a wasteful and deplorable activity that Muslims should avoid. News Straits Times. Retrieved July 30, 2015 from www.facebook.com/permalink.php?id=575552042481223&story_fbid=579543168748777.Google Scholar

ASC 1988. A National Strategy for the Study of Asia in Australia. Canberra: Asian Studies Council Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar

ASER 2013. Annual Status of Education Report: National 2012. Lahore: South Asian Forum for Education Development.Google Scholar

ASER 2014. Annual Status of Education Report: National 2013. Lahore: South Asian Forum for Education Development.Google Scholar

Asia Education Foundation 2010. The current state of Asian language education summary. Education Services Australia, Carlton South, Vic. Australia.Google Scholar

Asif, Qazi 2013. Newspaper numbers decrease as readership increases. Daily Times, November 23.Google Scholar

Asmah, Haji Omar 1992. The Linguistic Scenery in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Google Scholar

Asmah, Haji Omar (ed.) 2004. The Encyclopedia of Malaysia: Languages and Literature. Singapore: Archipelago Press.Google Scholar

Asmah, Haji Omar 2012. Pragmatics of maintaining English in Malaysia’s education system, in Low, Ee-Ling and Hashim, Azirah (eds.), English in Southeast Asia: Features, Policy and Language in Use [Varieties of English Around the World], pp. 155–74. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Asmah, Haji Omar 2013. Crossing the Malay Linguistic Divide. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Google Scholar

Atkinson, David 1987. The mother tongue in the classroom: a neglected resource? ELT Journal 41(4): 241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auer, Peter 1984. Bilingual Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Australia 2008a. Australia 2020 summit. Final report, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Canberra. Retrieved February 11, 2014 from http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/81461/20080610-0000/www.australia2020.gov.au/docs/final_report/2020_summit_report_full_low_graphics.pdf.Google Scholar

Australia 2008b. Australia 2020 summit. Initial summit report, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Canberra. Retrieved February 11, 2014 from www.safecom.org.au/pdfs/2020summit-initial-report.pdf.Google Scholar

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2012. Data created using Table Builder and the Language and Cultural Diversity 2011 Database. Retrieved from www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/Data.Google Scholar

Babu, P. 1971. Prosodic features in Indian English: stress, rhythm and intonation (Unpublished research diploma dissertation). CIE and FL, Hyderabad.Google Scholar

Bakhtikireyeva, Uldanai M. 2014. Russkiy – polinatsionalny yazyk? (Is Russian a multinational language? In Russian), Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov, Linguistics Series 2: 16–30.Google Scholar

Balasubramanian, T. 1980. Timing in Tamil, Journal of Phonetics 8: 449–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamgboṣe, Ayọ 1982. Standard Nigerian English: issues of identification, in Kachru, Braj (ed.), The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures, pp. 148–61. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Bansal, Raj K. 1976 [1969]. The Intelligibility of Indian English [Monograph 4] (2nd edn.). Hyderabad: CIE and FL.Google Scholar

Bansal, Raj K. 1983. Studies in Phonetics and Spoken English [Monograph 10]. Hyderabad: CIE and FL.Google Scholar

Bao, Zhiming 1998. The sounds of Singapore English, in Joseph, Foley (ed.), English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore, pp. 152–74. Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bao, Zhiming and Hong, Huaqing 2006. Diglossia and register variation in Singapore English, World Englishes 25(1): 105–14.Google Scholar

Bardhan, S. K. 1999. A phonological study of Chakma and English (Unpublished MA dissertation). CIE and FL, Hyderabad.Google Scholar

Basham, Arthur L. 1954. The Wonder That Was India. New York: Grove Press Inc.Google Scholar

Baskaran, Loga 2004. Malaysian English – phonology, in Schneider, Edgar, Burridge, Kate, Kortmann, Bernd, Mesthrie, Rajend and Upton, Clive (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, pp. 1034–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Baskaran, Loga 2005. A Malaysian English Primer: Aspects of Malaysian English Features. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, Robert Stewart 1984. The Hong Kong Cantonese Speech Community. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar

Baumgardner, Robert J. (ed.) 1993. The English Language in Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baumgardner, Robert J. 1987. Utilizing Pakistani newspaper English to teach grammar, World Englishes 6(3): 241–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgardner, Robert J. 1995. Pakistani English: acceptability and the norm, World Englishes 14: 261–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgardner, Robert J., Audrey, E. H. and Shamim, Fauzia 1993. The Urduization of English in Pakistan, in Baumgardner, Robert J. (ed.), The English Language in Pakistan, pp. 83–203. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bautista, Maria Lourdes S. 1997. The lexicon of Philippine English, English is an Asian language: the Philippine context – Proceedings of the Conference held in Manila on August 2–3, 1996, pp. 49–71. Sydney: The Macquarie Library Pty. Ltd.Google Scholar

Bautista, Maria Lourdes S. 2000a. The grammatical features of educated Philippine English, in Bautista, Maria Lourdes S., Llamzon, Teodoro A. and Sibayan, Bonifacio P. (eds.), Parangal Cang Brother Andrew: Festschrift in Honor of Bro. Andrew Gonzalez on His Sixtieth Birthday, pp. 146–58. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar

Bautista, Maria Lourdes S. 2000b. Defining Standard Philippine English: Its Status and Grammatical Features. Manila: De La Salle University Press.Google Scholar

Bautista, Maria Lourdes S. (ed.) 2011. Studies of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine Component of the International Corpus of English. Manila: Anvil Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar

Bautista, Maria Lourdes S. and Bolton, Kingsley (eds.) 2008. Philippine English: Linguistic and Literary Perspectives. Hong Kong University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bautista, Maria Lourdes S. and Gonzalez, Andrew B. 2006. Southeast Asian Englishes, in Kachru, Braj, Kachru, Yamuna and Nelson, Cecil L. (eds.), Handbook of World Englishes, pp. 130–44. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bautista, Maria Lourdes S., Lising, Jenifer Loy V. and Dayag, Danilo T. (comps.) 2004. International Corpus of English-Philippines Lexical Corpus. CD-ROM. London: International Corpus of English.Google Scholar

Beckman, Mary 1996. Stress and Non-Stress Accent. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Beeson, Mark and Jayasuriya, Kanishka 2009. The politics of Asian engagement: ideas, institutions, and academics, Australian Journal of Politics and History 55: 360–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beg, Muhammad Abdul Jabbar 1979. Arabic Loanwords in Malay: A Comparative Study (2nd edn.). Kuala Lumpur: University of Malay Press.Google Scholar

Benitez, I. 2009. The Relevance of English in Philippine Courtrooms. Paper presented at the 14th English in Southeast Asia Conference. Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines.Google Scholar

Bernard, Jacques 2003. Language policy and the promotion of national identity in Indonesia, in Brown, Michael and Ganguly, Sumit (eds.), Fighting Words: Language Policy and Ethnic Relations in Asia, pp. 263–90. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bhatia, Tej K. 1982. English and vernaculars of India: contact and change, Applied Linguistics 3(3): 235–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhatia, Tej K. 1987. A History of the Hindi Grammatical Tradition (Hindi-Hindustani Grammar, Grammarians, History and Problems). Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhatia, Tej K. 2001. Grammatical traditions in contact: the case of India, in Kniffka, Hannes (ed.), Indigenous Grammar Across Cultures, pp. 89–115. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Bhatia, Tej K. 2007. Advertising and Marketing in Rural India: Language, Culture and Communication. New Delhi: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Bhatia, Tej K. 2011. The multilingual mind, optimization theory, and Hinglish, in Kothari, Rita and Snell, Rupert (eds.), Chutneying English: The Phenomenon of Hinglish, pp. 37–52. New Delhi: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Bhatia, Tej K. and Machida, Kazuhiko 2008. The Oldest [European] Grammar of Hindustani: Language, Contact and Colonial Legacy. Tokyo: Tokyo University.Google Scholar

Bhatia, Tej K. and Ritchie, William C. 2004. Language mixing, typology, and second language acquisition, in Bhaskararao, Peri and Karumuri, Venkata Subbarao (eds.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2001, pp. 37–62. London/Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar

Bhatia, Tej K. and Ritchie, William C. 2013. Bilingualism and multilingualism in South Asia, in Bhatia, Tej K. and Ritchie, William C. (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism, pp. 843–69. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rakesh M. 2000. Optimal expressions in Indian English, English Language and Linguistics 4(1): 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan and Finegan, Edward 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Essex: Longman.Google Scholar

Bilbow, Grahame T. 1997. Cross-cultural impression management in the multicultural workplace: the special case of Hong Kong, Journal of Pragmatics 28: 461–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan David 1998. Visions and realities: researcher-activist-indigenous collaborations in indigenous language maintenance, in Kasten, Erich (ed.), Bicultural Education in the North: Ways of Preserving and Enhancing Indigenous Peoples’ Languages and Traditional Knowledge, pp. 13–28. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David 2014. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.63) [Computer software]. Retrieved January 24, 2014 from www.praat.org/.Google Scholar

Bokhorst-Heng, Wendy, Rubdy, Rani, McKay, Sandra Lee and Alsagoff, Lubna 2010. Whose English? Language ownership in Singapore’s English language debates, in Lim, Lisa, Pakir, Anne and Wee, Lionel (eds.), English in Singapore: Modernity and Management [Asian Englishes Today], pp. 133–55. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar

Bolton, Kingsley 2003. Chinese Englishes: A Sociolinguistic History. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bolton, Kingsley 2010. ‘Thank you for calling’: Asian Englishes and ‘native-like’ performance in Asian call centres, in Kirkpatrick, Andy (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes, pp. 550–64. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bolton, Kingsley and Kachru, Braj B. (eds.) 2007. Asian Englishes. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bolton, Kingsley and Ng, Bee Chin 2014. The dynamics of multilingualism in contemporary Singapore, World Englishes 33(3): 307–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosco, Joseph 2007. Young people’s ghost stories in Hong Kong, The Journal of Popular Culture 40(5): 785–807. (Also available at www.cuhk.edu.hk/ant/joseph/JPCU_454.pdf).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Brazil, David 1992. The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Adam 1988. The staccato effect in the pronunciation of English in Malaysia and Singapore, in Foley, Joseph A. (ed.), New Englishes: The Case of Singapore, pp. 115–28. Singapore University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Adam 1999. Singapore English in a Nutshell: An Alphabetical Description of Its Features. Singapore: Federal Publications.Google Scholar

Brown, Adam and Deterding, David 2005. A checklist of Singapore English pronunciation features, in Brown, Adam, Deterding, David and Low, Ee-Ling (eds.), English in Singapore: Phonetic Research on a Corpus, pp. 7–13. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education (Asia).Google Scholar

Bukhari, Khial (ed.) 1958. Da Divān Ma āz Ullāh Khān Mōhmand Musammā ba Āinā Namā [Pashto/Urdu]: The Poetic Collection of Maaz Ullah Khan. Peshawar: Pashto Academy, University of Peshawar.Google Scholar

Butt, Craig and Marshall, Konrad October 17, 2013. Home chat cause for rethink on school Mandarin eligibility, The Age, Online Edition. Retrieved February 18, 2014 from www.theage.com.au/national/education/home-chat-cause-for-rethink-on-school-mandarin-eligibility-20131016-2vmzn.html#ixzz2hvhNEaK8.Google Scholar

Caldwell, Robert P. 1903. A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian Family of Languages (1956 edn.). Madras: Oriental Books.Google Scholar

Campbell, Stuart. The Arabic element in Indonesian – what do students need to know about it? Retrieved July 20, 2015 from http://wacana.usc.edu.au/4/campbell.html.Google Scholar

Canagarajah, Suresh 2009. The plurilingual tradition and the English language in South Asia, AILA Review 22: 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canagarajah, Suresh 2013. Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cannon, Garland 1992. Malay(sian) borrowings in English, American Speech 67: 134–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cannon, Garland 1998. Antedating primarily Arabic loans in English. Dictionaries 19: 97–123. Retrieved November 18, 2015 from http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/dictionaries/v019/19.cannon.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carney, John April 1, 2012. Agents make killing on “haunted houses”. Sunday Morning Post, p. 13.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel 2009. Communication Power. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Castles, Stephen and Miller, Mark 2009. Age of Migration (4th edn.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cavallaro, Francesco and Chin, Ng Bee 2009. Between status and solidarity in Singapore, World Englishes 28(2): 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cavallaro, Francesco, Chin, Ng Bee and Seilhamer, Mark Fifer 2014. Singapore colloquial English: issues of prestige and identity, World Englishes 33(3): 378–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Census 1951. Census of Pakistan Population, 1951. Karachi: Govt. of Pakistan, Manager of Publications.Google Scholar

Census 1961. Census of Pakistan Population, 1961 (Vol. I. Pakistan by A. Rashid). Karachi: Ministry of Home & Kashmir Affairs, Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar

Cha, Yun-Kyung and Ham, Seung-Hwan 2008. The impact of English on the school curriculum, in Spolsky, Bernd and Hult, Francis (eds.), Handbook of Educational Linguistics, pp. 313–28. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chan, Shui Duen 2011. Language policy, Putonghua teaching and assessment (in Chinese), in Duen, Chan Shui and Xinhua, Zhu (eds.), Studies of Putonghua Proficiency Assessment for Secondary Students, pp. 2–30. Hong Kong: Chung Hwa Book Company.Google Scholar

Chand, V. 2010. Postvocalic (r) in urban Indian English, English World-Wide 31(1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Han Pi and Chang, Wei-an 2011. Malaixiya Fuluoshanbei de Kejia zuqun fenxi (The analysis of the Hakka group in Balik Pulau, Malaysia), in Huang, X. Q. (ed.), Zuqun, Lishi yu Wenhua: Kua yu Yanjiu Dongnanya he Dongya (Ethnic Group, History and Culture: The Cross-border Studies in Southeast Asia and East Asia), pp. 195–216. Singapore: Department of Chinese Studies, National University of Singapore and Global Publishing.Google Scholar

Chaudhuri, Amit August 8, 1997. Beyond the language of the Raj. Times Online.Google Scholar

Chaudhury, S. 1984. Some aspects of the phonology of Indian English (Unpublished doctoral thesis). CIE and FL, Hyderabad.Google Scholar

Chen, Ping 1999. Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Xiaojin 2003. Malaixiya de Sange Hanyu Fangyan (Three Chinese Dialects in Malaysia). Chinese Academy of Social Science Publishing House.Google Scholar

Cheng, Winnie and Tsui, Amy B. M. 2009. ‘Ahh ((laugh)) well there is no comparison between the two I think’: How do Hong Kong Chinese and native speakers of English disagree with each other? Journal of Pragmatics 41: 2365–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheung, Amy 2005. Ghost town. Hong Kong Magazine. Retrieved September 8, 2013.Google Scholar

Choi, Chi-Cheung. Between ghost and ancestor: grand universal salvation rituals of the Cantonese Chinese in South China, Hong Kong and the British Strait Settlements. Ongoing CERG project, Research Grants Council, Hong Kong. Retrieved September 5, 2013 from https://cerg1.ugc.edu.hk/cergprod/scrrm00542.jsp?proj_id=448613&old_proj_id=&proj_title=Ghosts&isname=Poo&ioname=&institution=&subject=&pages=1&year=&theSubmit=448613.Google Scholar

Chong, Siew Ling and Wang, Xiaomei 2009. Jilongpo guozhong huayi xuesheng de yuyan xuanze (Language choice by Chinese students from national secondary schools in Kuala Lumpur), in Siew Ling, Chong and Xiaomei, Wang (eds.), Discovering the Language: Issues in the Use of Chinese Language, pp. 185–211. Seri Kembangan: United Publishing House.Google Scholar

Chow, Vivienne September 27, 2009. Food for ghosts now a treat for the living. Sunday Morning Post, p. 3.Google Scholar

Clayton, Thomas 2006. Language Choice in a Nation under Transition: English Language Spread in Cambodia. Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clyne, Michael 2005. Australia’s Language Potential. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar

Clyne, Michael and Kipp, Sandra 2006. Tiles in a Multilingual Mosaic: Macedonian, Filipino and Somali in Melbourne. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

COAG [Council of Australian Goernments] 1994. Asian Languages and Australia’s Economic Future. Brisbane: Queensland Government Printer.Google Scholar

Coleman, Hywel 2010. Teaching and Learning in Pakistan: The Role of Language in Education. Islamabad: The British Council.Google Scholar

Collins, Peter 2011. Variable agreement in the existential -there construction in Philippine English, in Bautista, Maria Lourdes S (ed.), Studies of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine Component of the International Corpus of English, pp. 175–86. Manila: Anvil Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar

Common European Framework for Languages. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division, Council of Europe. Retrieved November 23, 2014 from www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf.Google Scholar

Commonwealth of Australia 2012. Australia in the Asian Century. Canberra: Government Printers. Licensed from the Commonwealth of Australia under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License.Google Scholar

Constitution of Turkmenistan of 2008 (Konstitutsiya Turkmenistana 2008 goda. In Russian). Retrieved December 23, 2013 from legislationline.org/ru/documents/action/popup/id/15605/preview.Google Scholar

Cook, Guy 2010. Translation in Language Teaching: An Argument for Reassessment. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Coronel, Lilian M. 2011. Patterns of intensifier usage in Philippine English, in Bautista, Maria Lourdes S. (ed.), Studies of Philippines English: Exploring the Philippine Component of the International Corpus of English, pp. 93–116. Manila: De La Salle University Centennial Book Series.Google Scholar

Crewe, William 1977. Singapore English as a non-native dialect, in Crewe, William (ed.), The English Language in Singapore, pp. 96–119. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.Google Scholar

Crystal, David 1997. English as a Global Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crystal, David 2003. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (5th edn.). Malden, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Crystal, David 2004. The Stories of English. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Cummings, Patrick J. and Wolf, Hans-Georg 2011. A Dictionary of Hong Kong English. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Melissa Gail and Thomas, Nicholas (eds.) 2007. Advancing East Asian Regionalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

D’Souza, Jean 1992. Dimensions of sociolinguistic areas, in Dimock, Edward, Kachru, Braj and Krishnamurti, Bh. (eds.), Dimensions of Sociolinguistics in South Asia, pp. 15–23. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Davies, Christopher 2005. Divided by a Common Language: A Guide to British and American English. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Dayag, Danilo T. 2004. The English language-media of the Philippines, World Englishes (Special Issue on Philippine English: Tensions and Transitions) 23(1): 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dayag, Danilo T. 2007a. Philippine English: its status, functions, and lexical properties, in Nakano, Michiko (ed.), World Englishes and Miscommunications, pp. 59–69. Tokyo: Waseda University International.Google Scholar

Dayag, Danilo T. 2007b. Exploring the intelligibility of Philippine English, Asian Englishes 10(1): 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dayag, Danilo T. 2008. English-language media in the Philippines: description and research, in Bautista, Maria Lourdes S. and Bolton, Kingsley (eds.), Philippine English: Linguistic and Literary Perspectives, pp. 49–66. Hong Kong University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dayag, Danilo T. 2012. Philippine English, in Low, Ee-Ling and Hashim, Azirah (eds.), pp. 91–9.Google Scholar

de Guise, Lucien 2012, January 8. ART & ABOUT: spirit of Al-Aqsa. New Straits Times. Retrieved July 30, 2015 from www2.nst.com.my/streets/central/art-about-spirit-of-al-aqsa-1.29164.Google Scholar

DEEWR/AEF 2011. National Asian Languages and Studies in Schools Program. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations and Asia Education Foundation.Google Scholar

Dekker, Diane and Young, Catherine 2005. Bridging the gap: the development of appropriate educational strategies for minority language communities in the Philippines, Current Issues in Language Planning 6(2): 182–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demographic Yearbook of the Republic of Kyrgyzstan 2013. (Demograficheskiy Yezhegodnik Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki: 2008–2012. In Russian). Bishkek: NatsStatCom Kyrgyzskaya Respublika.Google Scholar

Demoskop Weekly 2013. Institute of demography, Higher School of Economics’ National Research University. No 577–8. 2–15 December. All-Union Population Census in 1989. Ethnic Structure of the USSR Republics’ Population. Uzbek SSR. (Vsesoyuznaya perepis naseleniya 1989 goda. Natsionalny sostav naseleniya po respublikam SSSR. Uzbekskaya SSR. In Russian). Retrieved December 14, 2013 from https://demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/sng_nac_89.php?reg=4.Google Scholar

Department of Statistics Malaysia 1995. Population Distribution and Basic Demographic Characteristics. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Statistics.Google Scholar

Department of Statistics Malaysia 2012. Statistics Year Book Malaysia 2011 (E-Book). Retrieved September 13, 2015 from www.mpklang.gov.my/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=b9bbc4fb-2f76-4231-b6ed-58fa36eab0a4&groupId=283929.Google Scholar

Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade and Industry, Singapore 2010. Singapore census of population 2010 statistical release 1: demographic characteristics, education, language and religion. Retrieved November 19, 2015 from www.singstat.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/publications/publications_and_papers/cop2010/census_2010_release1/cop2010sr1.pdf.Google Scholar

Deterding, David 2005. Emergent patterns in the vowels of Singapore English, English World-Wide 26(2): 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deterding, David 2007. Dialects of English: Singapore English. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Deterding, David and Ee-Ling, Low 2001. The NIE corpus of spoken Singapore English (NIECSSE), SAAL Quarterly 56: 2–5.Google Scholar

Deterding, David and Hvitfeldt, Robert 1994. The features of Singapore English pronunciation: implications for teachers, Teaching and Learning 15(1): 98–107.Google Scholar

Deterding, David and Sharbawi, Salbrina 2013. Brunei English: A New Variety in a Multilingual Setting. Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devy, Ganesh N. 1992. After Amnesia: Tradition and Change in Indian Literary Citicism. Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar

Devy, Ganesh N. 1993. Criticism in crisis, in Ganesh N. Devy (ed.), In Another Tongue: Essays on Indian English Literature, pp. 36–44. New Delhi: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Deyama, Keikichi January 20, 1988 (evening edition). Kankoku no eigojijo (Status of English in Korea). The Chunichi Shimbun.Google Scholar

Dhamija, Pushya Vibhooti 1976. A phonological description of Rajasthani English (unpublished MA dissertation). CIE and FL, Hyderabad.Google Scholar

Dimock, Edward, Kachru, Braj and Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju (eds.) 1992. Dimensions of Sociolinguistics in South Asia. Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Doiz, Aintzane, Lasagabaster, David and Sierra, Juan M. 2013. Future challenges for English-medium instruction at the tertiary level, in Doiz, Aintzane, Lasagabaster, David and Sierra, Juan Manuel (eds.), English-Medium Instruction at Universities: Global Challenges, pp. 213–21. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Dongzong website 1. Retrieved September 13, 2015 from www.djz.edu.my/resource/images/doc/DataAnalysis/2012%20DZ%20AR-433–437.pdf.Google Scholar

Dongzong website 2. Retrieved September 23, 2013 from http://www.djz.edu.my/resource/images/doc/DataAnalysis/2012%20DZ%20AR-433-437.pdf.Google Scholar

Dustoor, Phiroze Edulji 1954. Missing and intrusive articles in Indian English, Allahabad University Studies 31: 1–70.Google Scholar

Dyachkov, Mark Vladimirovich and Abramova, Elena Ivanovna 2010. Ob istoryi iazykovoy politiki v Rossii’, Vestnik MGPU 2: 53–60.Google Scholar

Dyrud, Lars O. 2001. Hindi-Urdu: stress-accent or non-stress accent? (Unpublished MA thesis). University of North Dakota, Grand Forks.Google Scholar

Dzhusupov, Makhanbet 2013. Sovremenny russkiy literaturny yazyk: invariant i variatsii (Modern literary Russian l: invariant and varieties. In Russian), Filologicheskiye nauki (Philological Sciences) 2: 16–29.Google Scholar

Elder, Cathie 2000. Outing the native speaker: the problem of diverse learner backgrounds in “foreign” language classrooms – an Australian case study, Culture and Curriculum 13(1): 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliot, Annie B. 1983. Errors in English. Singapore University Press.Google Scholar

Emeneau, Murray B. 1956. India as a linguistic area, Language 32(1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emeneau, Murray B. 1969. Onomatopoetics in the Indian linguistic area, Language 45(2): 274–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emeneau, Murray B. 1980. India and linguistic areas, in Dil, Anwar N. (ed.), Language and Linguistic Area: Essays by Murray B. Emeneau, pp. 126–66. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Emeneau, Murray B. and Borrow, Thomas 1962. Dravidian Borrowings from Indo-Aryan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Encyclopedia Britannica. Lingua franca. Retrieved July 9, 2013 from http://global.britannica.com/topic/lingua-franca.Google Scholar

English 2014. List of countries by English-speaking population. Retrieved September 30, 2014 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_English-speaking_population.Google Scholar

Erlich, Jeff 2013. Culture of Uzbekistan, Countries and Their Cultures. Retrieved December 15, 2013 from www.everyculture.com/To-Z/Uzbekistan.html.Google Scholar

ESP 2014. Economic Survey of Pakistan 2013–14. Islamabad: Govt. of Pakistan, Finance Division, Economic Adviser’s Wing.Google Scholar

Ethnic structure of the population (Natsionalny sostav naseleniya. In Russian) 2013. Natsionalny statistichesky komitet Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki (National Statistic Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic). Retrieved December 11, 2013 from www.stat.kg/stat.files/din.files/census/5010003.pdf.Google Scholar

ETS 2012. ETS Generated Report: A Snapshot of Those Who Took the GRE General Test; Period Covered 2011 August to 2012 June. Islamabad: United States Education Foundation.Google Scholar

Evans, Grant 1997. Ghosts and the new governor: the anthropology of a Hong Kong rumour, in Evans, Grant and Tam, Maria (eds.), Hong Kong: The Anthropology of a Chinese Metropolis, pp. 266–96. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar

Evans, Stephen 2013. The long march to biliteracy and trilingualism: language policy in Hong Kong education since the handover, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 33: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Everest Group 2012. Philippine Information Technology and Business Process Management (IT-BPM) Road Map. Manila: Everest Group and Outsource2Philippines.Google Scholar

Ezekiel, Nissim 1982. Two readers and their texts, in Amirthanayagam, Guy (ed.), Asian and Western Writers in Dialogue, pp. 137–41. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fahrudin, Diding 2013, May. English language teaching material development in Pesnatren institutions: a transcultural flow experience in Indonesia. Paper presented at the COTEFL Conference, Purwokerto, Indonesia.Google Scholar

Fanai, Lalrindiki T. 1989. Some aspects of the autosegmental phonology of English and Mizo (unpublished MA thesis). CIE and FL, Hyderabad.Google Scholar

Felde, Olga V. 2011. The ethno-linguistic situation in the Krasnoyarsk territory at the beginning of the third millenium, Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences 7: 919–29.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles 1959. The Arabic koine, Language 35(4): 616–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Féry, Caroline 2010. Indian languages as intonational ‘phrase languages’, in Hasnain, Imtiaz and Chaudhury, Shreesh (eds.), Festschrift to Honour Ramakant Agnihotri, pp. 292–316. New Delhi: Aakar Publisher.Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline 2011. Indian languages as intonational ‘phrase languages’, in I. Hasnain, & S. Chaudhury, (Eds.), Festschrift to honour Ramakant Agnihotri, pp. 292–316. New Delhi: Aakar Publisher.Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline and Pandey, Pramod 2012. Focus in Hindi and in Indian English. Collaborative research project at the Institute of Linguistics, Johann Wilhelm Goethe University, Frankfurt-am Mein and Department of Linguistics, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline, Pandey, Pramod and Kenntner, Gerrit 2014. The prosody of focus and givenness in Hindi and Indian English. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Feuchtwang, Stephan 1992. The Imperial Metaphor: Popular Religion in China. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Finance Committee of HK Legislative Council 2014. Discussion paper of Finance Committee FCR (2013–14) 49, Hong Kong Legislative Council. Retrieved February 3, 2014 from www.legco.gov.hk/yr13-14/chinese/fc/fc/papers/f13-49c.pdf.Google Scholar

Finegan, Edward 2004. American English and its distinctiveness, in Finegan, Edward and Rickford, John R. (eds.), Language in the USA: Themes for the Twenty-First Century, pp. 18–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishman, Joshua 1972. The Sociology of Language. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Foster, William (ed.) 1906. The English Factories in India: 1618–1621: A calendar of Documents in the India Office, British Museum and Public Record Office. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Fries, Charles C. 1945. Teaching and Learning English as a Foreign Language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Robert 2012. A Duration-Based Account of Speech Rhythm in Indian English. Poster presented at Laboratory Phonology (LabPhon) 13, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1960. Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: Mohr and Siebeck. [Weinsheimer, J. and Marshall, D. G. (Engl. Trans.) 1975. Truth and Method. London: Sheed and Ward].Google Scholar

Galyamov, Damir 2013. Obrazovaniye na Russkom Yazyke v Kirgizii: Vyzhit Vopreki. (Russian-language Education in Kirgizia: To Survive Notwithstanding. In Russian). Russian Unity Foundation (Fond russkoye yedinstvo). Retrieved September 18, 2015 from http://www.russkie.org/index.php?module=fullitem&id=30026.Google Scholar

Gao, Tianru 1993. Zhongguo Xiandai Yuyan Jihua de Lilun he Shijian (Theory and Practice of Modern Language Planning in China). Shanghai: Fudan University Press.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gelbmann, Mathius 2013. Russian Is Now the Second Most Used Language on the Web. 19 March. W3Techs. Web Technology Surveys. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://w3techs.com/blog/entry/russian_is_now_the_second_most_used_language_on_the_web.Google Scholar

George, Karimpumannil Mathai 1991. The Indian writer and cultural integration (first delivered at a literary symposium in Hyderabad in 1956), in George, Karimpumannil Mathai (ed.), A Many Branched Tree: Perspectives of Indian Literary Tradition, 1991, Report 2001. Delhi: Ajanta Publications.Google Scholar

George, Rosemary Marangoly 2013. Indian English and the Fiction of National Literature. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, Saran Kaur 2007. Shift in language policy in Malaysia, AILA Review 20: 106–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, Saran Kaur 2012. The complexities of re-reversal of language-in-education policies in Malaysia, in Kirkpatrick, Andy and Sussex, Roland (eds.), English as an International Language in Asia: Implications for Language Education, pp. 45–62. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillard, Julia 2011. Speech to the Asia Link and Asia Society Lunch, Melbourne. Retrieved February 7, 2014 from http://pmtranscripts.dpmc.gov.au/release/transcript-18161.Google Scholar

Global Interests. Retrieved July 23, 2013 from www.globalinterests.org.Google Scholar

Gluschenko, Olesya 2004. Ethnolinguistic situation in Kamchatka: genesis, modern state, peculiarities of the Kamceatka dialect, Journal Collection of Scientific Works of KRASEC. The Humanities 1: 99–103.Google Scholar

Goh, Yee Teck 1983. Students’ perception and attitude towards the varieties of English spoken in Singapore, in Noss, Richard B (ed.), Varieties of English in Southeast Asia, pp. 251–77. Singapore University Press.Google Scholar

Gokak, Vinayaka Krishna 1944. English in India: Its Present and Future. Report 1964. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar

Gokhale, Shridhar Balkrishna 1982. The intonational system of Marathi and Marathi English (unpublished doctoral thesis). CIE and FL, Hyderabad.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, John 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology: A New Synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gonzales, Andrew B. 1983. When does an error become a feature of Philippine English? in Noss, Richard B. (ed.), Varieties of English in Southeast Asia [RELC Anthology Series #11], pp. 150–72. Singapore: SEOMEO Regional Language Centre.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, Andrew B. 1996. The history of English in the Philippines, in Bautista, Maria Lourdes S. (ed.), Readings in Philippines Sociolinguistics, pp. 327–40. Manila: De La Salle University Press.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, Andrew B. 1991. Stylistic shifts in the English of the Philippine print media, in Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, pp. 333–63. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, Andrew B. 1997. The history of English in the Philippines, in Bautista, Maria Lourdes S. (ed.), English is an Asian Language: The Philippine Context, pp. 25–40. Sydney: The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd.Google Scholar

Gooneratne, Yasmine 1981. Cultural independence and the writer in Sri Lanka, in Wang, Gungwu, Guerrero, Milagros C. and Marr, David (eds.), Society and the Writer in Modern Asia, pp. 281–93. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Goonetilleke, Devapriya Chitra R. A. 1990. Sri Lanka’s “ethnic” conflict in its literature in English, in Davis, Geoffrey and Maes-Jelinek, Hena (eds.), Crisis and Creativity in the New Literatures in English, pp. 333–4. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Gopinathan, Saravanan 1998. Language policy changes 1979–1997: politics and pedagogy, in Gopinathan, Saravanan, Pakir, Anne, Kam, Ho Wah and Saravanan, Vanithamani (eds.), Language, Society and Education in Singapore: Issues and Trends (2nd edn.), pp. 19–44. Singapore: Times Academic Press.Google Scholar

Graddol, David 1997. The Future of English: A Guide to Forecasting the Popularity of the English Language in the 21st Century. London: The British Council.Google Scholar

Graddol, David 2006. English Next. London: The British Council.Google Scholar

Grataloup, Christian 2007. La Géohistoire de la Mondialisation. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Grenoble, Lenore A. 2003. Language Policy in the Soviet Union. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gumperz, John 1958. Dialect differences and social stratification in a North Indian Village, American Anthropologist 60: 668–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gumperz, John 1971. Hindi-Punjabi code-switching in Delhi, in Dil, Anwar (ed.), Language in Social Groups: Essays from John J. Gumperz, pp. 205–16. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John 1992. Contextualization revisited, in Auer, Peter and di Luzo, Aldo (eds.), The Contextualization of Language, pp. 39–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gumperz, John and Wilson, Robert 1971. Convergence and creolization: a case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian border in India, in Hymes, Dell (ed.), Pidginiztion and Creolization of Languages, pp. 151–67. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guo, Xi 2002. Putonghua cihui yu xinma cihui de xietiao yu guifan wenti (Harmonisation and standardisation: lexicon in Putonghua, Singaporean Mandarin and Malaysian Mandarin), Social Sciences in Nanjing 12: 78–83.Google Scholar

Guo, Xi 2003. Malaixiya Bincheng huaren shehui de yuyan shenghuo (The linguistic ecology in the Chinese community in Penang, Malaysia), Journal of Chinese Sociolinguistics 1: 125–34.Google Scholar

Gupta, Anthea Fraser 1986. A standard for written Singapore English, English World-Wide 7(1): 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gupta, Anthea Fraser 1994. The Step-Tongue: Children’s English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Gupta, Anthea Fraser 2010. Singapore Standard English revisited, in Lim, Lisa, Pakir, Anne and Wee, Lionel (eds.), English in Singapore: Unity and Utility, pp. 57–89. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar

Gupta, Raghubir S. and Kapoor, Kapil (eds.) 1991. English in India: Issues and Problems. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gut, Ulrike and Pillai, Stefanie 2014. Prosodic marking of information structure by Malaysian speakers of English, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36: 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gut, Ulrike, Pillai, Stefanie and Zuraidah, Mohd Don 2013. The prosodic marking of information status in Malaysian English, World Englishes 32(2): 185–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haan, Judith, van Heuven, Vincent J., Pacilly, Jos and van Bezooijen, Renée 1997. An anatomy of Dutch intonation, in Coerts, Jane A. and de Hoop, Helen (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1997, pp. 97–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hadisantosa, Nilawati 2010. Insights from Indonesia, in Johnston, Richard (ed.), Learning Through English: Policies, Challenges, Prospects, pp. 24–46. London: British Council.Google Scholar

Hamid, Ismail 1982. A survey of theories on the introduction of Islam in the Malay archipelago, Islamic Studies 21(3): 89–100.Google Scholar

Hasanova, Dilbarhon 2007. Broadening the boundaries of the expanding circle: English in Uzbekistan, World Englishes 26(3): 276–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hashim, Azirah 2009. Not plain sailing: Malaysia’s language choice in policy and education, AILA Review 22: 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hashim, Azirah 2014. English and the linguistic ecology of Malaysia, World Englishes 33(4): 458–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hashim, Azirah and Leitner, Gerhard 2011. Contact expressions in today’s Malaysian English, World Englishes 30(4): 551–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hashim, Azirah and Leitner, Gerhard 2014. English as a lingua franca in higher education in Malaysia, The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(1): 16–27.Google Scholar

Hashim, Azirah and Leitner, Gerhard 2016. English in language education policies and planning in Malaysia, in Omar, Asmah Haji (ed.), Languages in the Malaysian Education System: Monolingual Strands in Multilingual Settings. Singapore: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hashim, Azirah and Tan, Rachel Siew Kuang 2012. Malaysian English, in Ee-Ling Low and Azirah Hashim (eds.), English in Southeast Asia: Features, Policy and Language in Use [Varieties of English Around the World], pp. 55–74. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassim, Eeqbal 2013. Intercultural understanding through Asia perspectives in English, Literacy Learning: Middle Years 21(3): 7–16.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce 1982. Extrametricality and English stress, Linguistic Inquiry 13: 227–76.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce 1995. Metrical Stress Theory. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Heller, Monica 1988. Codeswitching: Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, Deborah 2007. A strategy cut short: the NALSAS strategy for Asian languages in Australia, Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 4(1): 4–22.Google Scholar

Herd, Wendy, Jongman, Allard and Sereno, Joan 2010. An acoustic and perceptual analysis of /t/ and /d/ flaps in American English, Journal of Phonetics 38: 504–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hino, Nobuyuki 1988a. Yakudoku: Japan’s dominant tradition in foreign language learning, JALT Journal 10(1/2): 45–55.Google Scholar

Hino, Nobuyuki 1988b. Nationalism and English as an international language: the history of English textbooks in Japan, World Englishes 7(3): 309–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hino, Nobuyuki 1992. The yakudoku tradition of foreign language literacy in Japan, in Dubin, Fraida and Kuhlman, Natalie A. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Literacy: Global Perspectives on Reading and Writing, pp. 99–111. Englewood Cliffs: Regents/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Hino, Nobuyuki 2001. Organizing EIL studies: toward a paradigm, Asian Englishes 4(1): 34–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hino, Nobuyuki 2003. Teaching EIL in Japan, Proceedings from First Conference on World Englishes in the Classroom, pp. 67–78. Nagoya, Japan: Chukyo University.Google Scholar

Hino, Nobuyuki 2009. The teaching of English as an international language in Japan: an answer to the dilemma of indigenous values and global needs in the expanding circle, AILA Review 22: 103–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hino, Nobuyuki 2012a. Endonormative models of EIL for the expanding circle, in Matsuda, Aya (ed.), Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language, pp. 28–43. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hino, Nobuyuki 2012b. Participating in the community of EIL users through real-time news: Integrated Practice in Teaching English as an International Language (IPTEIL), in Matsuda, Aya (ed.), Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language, pp. 183–200. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hino, Nobuyuki 2012c. Negotiating indigenous values with Anglo-American cultures in ELT in Japan: a case of EIL philosophy in the expanding circle, in Kirkpatrick, Andy and Sussex, Roland (eds.), English as an International Language in Asia: Implications for Language Education, pp. 157–73. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Hino, Nobuyuki 2013. Learning EIL through participation in the community of EIL users in Hawaii, in Hino, Nobuyuki (ed.), Eigokyoiku no Atarashii Choryu (New Currents in English Language Teaching), pp. 1–10. Osaka: Graduate School of Language and Culture, Osaka University.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas 2007. Preposition pied-piping and stranding in British and Kenyan English: an experimental- and corpus-based construction grammar analysis (unpublished dissertation). University of Regensburg.Google Scholar

Hofstede, Geert. What about Hong Kong? The Hofstede Centre. Retrieved September 4, 2013 from http://geert-hofstede.com/hong-kong.html.Google Scholar

Holliday, Adrian 2006. Native-speakerism, ELT Journal 60(4): 385–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hong Kong SAR Government 2013. Hong Kong: The Facts, 2012. The Information Services Department, Hong Kong SAR Government. Retrieved February 3, 2014 from www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/factsheets/docs/tourism.pdf.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Tourism Board 2014. The Hungry Ghost Festival. Retrieved March 13, 2014 from www.discoverhongkong.com/eng/see-do/events-festivals/chinese-festivals/the-hungry-ghost-festival.jsp#ixzz2q4FgHoEw.Google Scholar

Hosali, Priya 2005. Butler English, English Today 21(1): 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hosali, Priya and Aitchinson, Jean. 1986. Butler English: A minimal pidgin? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 1, 11: 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hou, Hongjian 1919. Nanyang Lvxing ji (Travel in Nanyang). Xi Cheng Company.Google Scholar

Houghton, Stephanie A. and Rivers, Damian J. (eds.) 2013. Native-speakerism in japan: intergroup dynamics in foreign language education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, Yi 2007. Aomen Yuyan Yanjiu (Study on the Languages of Macao). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Hyland, Tom October 12, 2008. Chinese is all Greek to students, The Age, p. 8.Google Scholar

ICE-GB. International Corpus of English. British English Component. Retrieved September 2, 2013 from http://ice-corpora.net/ice/.Google Scholar

ICE-HK. International Corpus of English. Hong Kong English Component. Retrieved September 2, 2013 from http://ice-corpora.net/ice/.Google Scholar

IELTS 2012. IELTS-Researchers – Test-Takers Performance 2012. Retrieved December 8, 2013 from http://www.ielts.org/researchers/analysis-of-test-data/test-taker-performance-2012.aspx.Google Scholar

Ikenaga, Katsumasa 1969. Eigo-kyokasho (English textbooks), in Nihon no Eigaku 100-nen henshubu (ed.), Nihon no Eigaku 100-nen: Showa-hen (100 Years of English Studies in Japan: The Showa Period), pp. 346–63. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar

Inamura, Matsuo, Isoo, Tetsuo, Naya, Tomoichi and Shimaoka, Takashi 1968. New Prince Readers 2. Tokyo: Kairyudo, Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Inui, Takashi 2010. John Manjiro no Eikaiwa (The First Manual of English Conversation in Japan by John Mung). Tokyo: J-Research-Shuppan.Google Scholar

Isaeva, Aliya and Sultaniarova, Anar 2013. N. A. Nazarbayev and peculiar features of ethnic language processes in Kazakhstan, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 80: 12–15.Google Scholar

Ivanov, Nikolay 2008. Vozrozhdeniye russkoyazychnoy literatury v Kazakhstane ne planiruyetsa. (The revival of Russian-language literature in Kazakhstan is not planned. In Russian). Polemika i diskussii. Retrieved December 9, 2013 from www.polemics.ru/articles/?articleID=11748&hideText=0&itemPage=1.Google Scholar

Ivanova, Nina I. 2008. Rechevoe povedenie v uslovyax mezhkulturnoy kommunikatzyi: sotziolingvisticeskaya realnost Iakutii, Izvestia Rossiyskogo Gosudarstvenogo Pedagogiceskogo Universiteta im. A. I. Gertzena 88: 132–40.Google Scholar

Jaaffar, Johan 2011, October 1. The virtues of propriety and courteousness. New Straits Times. Retrieved July 30, 2015 from www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-198269702.html.Google Scholar

Jakubowicz, Andrew and Ho, Christine 2013. For Those Who’ve Come Across the Seas…: Australian Multicultural Theory, Policy and Practice. North Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar

James, Dana November 5, 2001. B2-4B spells profits. Marketing News, pp. 11–12Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jennifer 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jennifer 2007. English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jennifer 2014. English as a Lingua Franca in the International University. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jones, Gary M. 2000. Some language planning questions facing Brunei Darussalam, Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines, in Bautista, Maria Lourdes S., Llamzon, Teodoro A. and Sibayana, Bonifacio P (eds.), Parangalcang Brother Andrew: A Festschrift for Andrew Gonzalez on his 60th Birthday, pp. 226–38. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar

Jones, Russell 2007. Loan Words in Indonesian and Malay. Compiled by the Indonesian Etymology Project. Leiden: KITVL Press.Google Scholar

Joseph, K. G. 1984. Intonation patterns of Telugu English (unpublished MA dissertation). CIE and FL, Hyderabad.Google Scholar

Joshi, Svati 1991. Rethinking English: an introduction, in Svati, Joshi (ed.), Rethinking English: Essays in English Literature, Language, History, pp. 3–31. New Delhi: Trianka.Google Scholar

Joshi, Svati (ed.) 1994. Rethinking English: Essays in Literature, Language, History. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kachru, Braj B. 1965. The Indianness in Indian English, Word 21(3): 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kachru, Braj B. (ed.) 1982. The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Kachru, Braj B. 1983. The Indianization of English: The English Language in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kachru, Braj B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: the English language in the outer circle, in Quirk, Randolph and Widdowson, Henry G. (eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, pp. 11–30. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kachru, Braj B. 1992. Models for non-native Englishes, in Kachru, Braj B. (ed.), The Other Tongue: English across Cultures (2nd edn.), pp. 48–74. Urbana, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Kachru, Braj B. 1997. Past imperfect: the other side of English in Asia, in Smith, Larry E. and Forman, Michael L. (eds.), World Englishes 2000, pp. 68–89. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Kachru, Braj B. 2005. Asian Englishes: Beyond the Canon. Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar

Kachru, Braj B., Kachru, Yamuna and Sridhar, S. N. (eds.) 2008. Language in South Asia. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahane, Henry 1992. American English: from a colonial substandard to a prestige language, in Kachru, Braj B. (ed.), The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures, pp. 211–19. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Kanno, Hiroomi September 6, 1986. Nihongo to chosengo no kankei saguru (Exploring the relationship between Japanese and Chinese). The Asahi Shimbun.Google Scholar

Karchner-Ober, Renate, Mukherjee, Dipika and David, Maya Khemlani 2011. Multilinguality in the Malaysian context of nation-building and globalization, in Mukherjee, Dipika and David, Maya Khemlani (eds.), National Language Planning and Language Shifts in Malaysian Minority Communities: Speaking in Many Tongues, pp. 173–84. Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Richard F. and Hardt, John P. (eds.) 1993. The Former Soviet Union in Transition. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc. Retrieved January 19, 2014 from https://books.google.com.my/books?id=JSwstF6SEAkC.Google Scholar

Kawai, Tadahito 2004. Kankoku: rekishi, hensen (Republic of Korea: history and transition), in Otani, Yasuhiro, Hayashi, Keiko, Aikawa, Masao, Azuma, Masami, Okihara, Katsuaki, Kawai, Tadahito,Takeuchi, Keiko and Takehisa, Fumiyo (eds.), Sekai no Gaikokugokyoiku-seisaku (Language Teaching Policy in the 21st Century), pp. 6–9. Tokyo: Toshindo.Google Scholar

Kawasumi, Tetsuo July 1976 (special issue). Yakudoku no rekishi. The English Teacher’s Magazine, pp. 14–19.Google Scholar

Kawasumi, Tetsuo 1978. Shiryo Nihon-eigakushi 2: Eigokyoiku-ronshoshi. (Controversies in English Language Teaching). Tokyo: Taishukan shoten.Google Scholar

Kelly, Louis G. 1969. 25 Centuries of Language Teaching: 500 BC–1969. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Khalikov, Yunus 2006. Uzbekistan’s Russian Language Conundrum. ISN ETH-Zuric. International Relations and Security Network. Retrieved December 15, 2013 from www.isn.ethz.ch/Digital-Library/Articles/Detail/?ots783=4888caa0-b3db-1461-98b9-e20e7b9c13d4&lng=en&id=52488.Google Scholar

Khan, Nasiruddin 1974. A phonological analysis of English spoken by all India radio newsreaders (unpublished postgraduate research diploma dissertation). CIE and FL, Hyderabad.Google Scholar

Khor, Ann-Marie. 2015. More time for Form 5 students. The Star Online. Retrieved September 21, 2015 from http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2015/08/20/More-time-for-Form-5-students-Compulsory-pass-for-English-and-practical-science-in-SPM-exam-put-on-h/.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul 1980. Panini as a Variationist. Pune: Center for Advanced Studies in Sanskrit, University of Poona.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Andy 2007. World Englishes: Implications for International Communication and English Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Andy 2010a. English as a Lingua Franca in ASEAN: A Multilingual Model. Hong Kong University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Andy 2010b. Introduction, in Kirkpatrick, Andy (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes, pp. 1–14. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Andy 2011. English as an Asian lingua franca, Language Teaching 44(2): 212–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Andy 2012. English in ASEAN: implications for regional multilingualism, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 33(4): 331–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Andy 2013. English as a medium of instruction in East and Southeast Asian universities, in Murray, Neil and Scarino, Angela (eds.), Dynamic Ecologies of Languages Education in the Asia-Pacific Region, pp. 15–29. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Andy and McLellan, James 2012. World Englishes, English as a lingua franca and discourse analysis, in Handford, Michael and Gee, James Paul (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 654–69. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Andy and Sussex, Roland 2012. English as an International Language in Asia: Implications for Language Education. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Andy, Deterding, David and Wong, Jennie 2008. The international intelligibility of Hong Kong English, World Englishes 27(3/4): 359–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Andy, Patkin, John and Jingjing, Wu 2013. The multilingual teacher and the multilingual curriculum: an Asian example of intercultural communication in the new era, in Sharifian, Farzad and Jamarani, Maryam (eds.), Intercultural Communication in the New Era, pp. 263–85. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kiss, Tamas, Ong, Cheng Teik and Pelly, Christine 2012. Student teachers’ perception of language use and their professional image, Malaysian Journal of ELT Research 8(1): 78–118.Google Scholar

Knapp, Karlfried and Meierkord, Christiane (eds.) 2002. Lingua Franca Communication. Berne: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, Jane March 2008. Crossborder higher education. Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society, New York.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, Yoshinori 2006. Nihon no kunten no ichigenryu (A root of symbols for translation in Japan), Kyuko, 49: 1–19.Google Scholar

Koi, Kye Lee December 1, 2013. Indelible ink halal, says fatwa council. Election Commission can now go ahead with the purchase for the next general election. New Straits Times. Retrieved July 30, 2015 from http://ddms.usim.edu.my/bitstream/handle/123456789/5251/12-1-12%20-%20Prime%20News%20Front%20Page%20%281%29.pdf?sequence=1.Google Scholar

Koike, Ikuo Koike, Ikuo et al. (ed.) 1983. Daigaku-Eigokyoiku ni Kansuru Jittai to Shoraizo no Sogoteki-Kenkyu 1: Kyoin no Tachiba (General Survey of English Language Teaching at Colleges and Universities in Japan: Teachers’ View). Tokyo: Research Group for College English Teaching in Japan.Google Scholar

Koike, Ikuo et al. (ed.) 1985. Daigaku-Eigokyoiku ni Kansuru Jittai to Shoraizo no Sogoteki-Kenkyu 2: Gakusei no Tachiba (General Survey of English Language Teaching at Colleges and Universities in Japan: Students’ View). Tokyo: Research Group for College English Teaching in Japan.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd (ed.) 2004. A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd and Schneider, Edgar W. 2004. General introduction, in Schneider, Edgar, Burridge, Kate, Kortmann, Bernd, Mesthrie, Rajend and Upton, Clive (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English. Volume 1: Phonology, pp. 1–9. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kotajima, Yosuke 1997. Kanbunkundoku to eibunkaishaku (Translation reading of classical Chinese and English), in Kawamoto, Koji and Inoue, Ken (eds.), Honyaku no Hoho (Methods of Translation), pp. 197–215. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar

Kreindler, Isabelle 1989. Soviet language planning since 1953, in Kirkwood, Michael (ed.), Language Planning in the Soviet Union, pp. 46–63. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar

Kretzschmar, William 2010. The development of standard American English, in Kirkpatrick, Andy (ed.), Handbook of World English, pp. 96–112. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju and Mukherjee, Aditi (eds.) 1984. Modernization of Indian Languages in News Media. Hyderabad: Department of Linguistics, Osmania University.Google Scholar

Kuiper, Franciscus Bernardus Jacobus 1967. The genesis of a linguistic area, Indo-Iranian Journal 10: 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumar, Sree and Sharon, Siddique 2008. Southeast Asia: The Diversity Dilemma. How Intra-regional Contradictions and External Forces are Shaping Southeast Asia Today. Singapore: Select Books Pte Ltd.Google Scholar

Kunihiro, Masao 1970. Eigo no Hanashikata (English Works for You). Tokyo: Simul Press.Google Scholar

Kwintessential 2012. Hong Kong: Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette. Retrieved August 29, 2013 from www.kwintessential.co.uk/resources/global-etiquette/hongkong-country-profile.html.Google Scholar

Kwon, Oryang 1990. Kankoku no eigokyoiku to kankokushiki-eigo (English language teaching in Korea and Korean English), in Honna, Nobuyuki (ed.), Ajia no Eigo (Varieties of English in Asia), pp. 23–41. Tokyo: Kuroshio shuppan.Google Scholar

Labov, William, Ash, Sharon and Boberg, Charles 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter 1993. A Course in Phonetics. Fort Worth: Hartcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter and Johnson, Keith 2006. A Course in Phonetics (5th ed.). Boston: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Laffan, Michael. n.d. Dispersing God’s shadows: reflections on the translation of Arabic political concepts into Malay and Indonesian. Retrieved November 18, 2015 from http://mcp.anu.edu.au/papers/laffan_apc.html.Google Scholar

Lake, Marilyn and Reynolds, Henry 2008. Drawing the Global Colour Line: White Men’s Countries and the Question of Racial Equality. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, George 1992. The contemporary theory of metaphor, in Ortony, Andrew (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd edn.), pp. 202–51. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lal, Purushottama (ed.) 1959. Modern Indo-Anglian Poetry. Delhi: Kavita.Google Scholar

Lal, Purushottama (ed.) 1969. The Writers Workshop Selection: Modern Indian Poetry in English: An Anthology and a Credo. Calcutta: Writers Workshop.Google Scholar

Laletina, Aleksandra Olegovna 2013. Globalizatzya i iazykovaia politika v sfere obrazovania: opyt Rossii i USA, Politicheskaya Lingvistika 43: 158–63.Google Scholar

Latha, P. 1978. Intonation of Malayalam and Malayalee English: a study of comparison and contrast (Unpublished MA dissertation). CIE and FL, Hyderabad.Google Scholar

Lau, Joseph Chi Chun 2004. The Chinese cultural model of indigenous belief in Hong Kong English (Unpublished paper). The University of Hong Kong, Department of English.Google Scholar

Lau, Yuet Lin and Wong, Hiu Fung 1992. Historical aphasia of Macao and cultural integration in the new millennium (in Chinese), in Ching, Cheung Fai (ed.), Conference Proceeding of Seminario Internacional Das Linguas Existentes Em Macau: Evolução No Periodo de Transnição, pp. 71–8. Macau: Academia de Ciências Sociais de Macau.Google Scholar

Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan 2012. On Tele- and Radio Broadcasting of 18 January 2012 No. 545- IV ZRK (Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan O televeschanii’ of 18 January 2012 No. 545-IV ZRK. In Russian). Chapter 4, Article 8. Retrieved December 8, 2013 from www.pavlodar.com/zakon/?dok=05235&uro=08028.Google Scholar

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan (December 21, 1995). Retrieved December 14, 2013 from www.usefoundation.org/view/894; Retrieved January 20, 2014 from www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b4d328.html.Google Scholar

Law of Turkmenistan on education 2009. (Zakon Turkmenistana ob obrazovanii.) августа15. № 51-IV. Article 5. Retrieved December 23, 2013 from www.base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx?rgn=28835.Google Scholar

Lee, Hanah August 18, 2003. A friend to lonely, hungry ghosts. South China Morning Post, p. 2.Google Scholar

Lee, Keng Fatt, Goh, Roy and Sulaiman, Aisyah May 7, 2012. Ulama denounce rally (HL). New Straits Times. Retrieved July 30, 2015 from www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-205063724.html.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian and Smith, Nicholas 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leitner, Gerhard 1992. Pluricentric English, in Clyne, Michael (ed.), Pluricentric Languages, pp. 178–237. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Leitner, Gerhard 2004. Australia’s Many Voices. Australian English – the National Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leitner, Gerhard 2007. Australia’s “Asia competence” and the uneasy balance between Asian languages and English, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 17(1): 29–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leitner, Gerhard 2014. Transforming Southeast Asian language habitats, World Englishes 33(4): 512–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leitner, Gerhard forthcoming. Pluricentricity and multiple layers of English in different habitats, in Calabrese, Rita, Chambers, Jack and Leitner, Gerhard (eds.), Language Variation and Change in Postcolonial Context. Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Leung, Sylvia 1992. Preparing Macao for the challenges of the new era: a sociolinguistic study of a multilingual microcosmos, in Ching, Cheung Fai (ed.), Conference Proceeding of Seminario Internacional Das Linguas Existentes Em Macau: Evolução No Periodo de Transnição, pp. 42–51. Macau: Academia de Ciências Sociais de Macau.Google Scholar

Lewis, Ivor 1991. Sahibs, Nabobs and Boxwallahs: A Dictionary of the Words of Anglo-India. Bombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F. and Fennig, Charles D. (eds.) 2015. Ethnologue: Languages of the World [18th edn.]. Dallas: SIL International. Retrieved July 28, 2015 from www.ethnologue.com.Google Scholar

Li, Chor Shing David 2013. Linguistic hegemony or linguistic capital? in Doiz, Aintzane, Lasagabaster, David and Sierra, Juan Manuel (eds.), English-Medium Instruction at Universities: Global Challenges, pp. 65–83. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Li, Yuming 2008. Yuyan gongneng guihua chuyi (On planning of language function), Applied Linguistics (Chinese) 1: 2–8.Google Scholar

Li, Yuming 2010. Quanqiu Huayu Cidian (A Dictionary of Global Huayu). The Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Li, Yuming 2011a. Yuyan yeshi “ying shili” (Language is also “hard power”), Journal of Central China Normal University 5: 68–72.Google Scholar

Li, Yuming 2011b. Tisheng guojia yuyan nengli de ruogan sikao (Some considerations on enhancing the national language capability), Nankai Journal of Linguistics 17: 1–8.Google Scholar

Li, Yuming 2012. Centenary of the promulgation of the state resolution (Proposal for establishing a common national language), Macao Journal of Linguistics 39: 4–13.Google Scholar

Liddicoat, Anthony J. and Scarino, Angela 2013. Intercultural Language Teaching and Learning. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lim, Lisa 2000. Ethnic group differences aligned? Intonation patterns of Chinese, Indian and Malay Singaporean English, in Brown, Adam, Deterding, David and Low, Ee-Ling (eds.), The English Language in Singapore, pp. 10–21. Singapore Association of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Lim, Lisa 2001. Towards a reference grammar of Singapore English (Unpublished final research report). Academic Research Fund, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar

Lim, Lisa (ed.) 2004. Singapore English: A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lim, Lisa 2012. Standards of English in Southeast Asia, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Standards of English: Codified Varieties Around the World, pp. 274–93. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lim, Lisa and Foley, Joseph A. 2004. English in Singapore and Singapore English: background and methodology, in Lim, Lisa (ed.), Singapore English: A Grammatical Description, pp. 1–18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Tik-sang 2003. A nameless but active religion: an anthropologist’s view of local religion in Hong Kong and Macau, The China Quarterly 174: 373–94. (Also available at http://repository.ust.hk/dspace/bitstream/1783.1/1869/1/nameless.pdf.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Xianbing 1992. Language situation of Macau during the years of its opening up (in Chinese), in Ching, Cheung Fai (ed.), Conference Proceeding of Seminario Internacional Das Linguas Existentes Em Macau: Evolução No Periodo de Transnição, pp. 67–70. Macau: Academia de Ciências Sociais de Macau.Google Scholar

Lo Bianco, Joseph 1987. National Policy on Languages. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services.Google Scholar

Lo Bianco, Joseph 2010. Language policy and planning, in Hornberger, Nancy H. and McKay, Sandra Lee (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Education, pp. 143–76. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Lo Bianco, Joseph 2011. A friendly knife? English in the context of Sri Lankan language politics, in Farrell, Lesley, Singh, Udaya Narayana and Giri, Ram Ashish (eds.), English Language Education in South Asia, pp. 36–60. Delhi: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lo Bianco, Joseph 2012. Afterword: tempted by targets, tempered by results, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 35(3): 359–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lo Bianco, Joseph 2013. What’s needed for Asian languages? Curriculum Perspectives 33(3): 74–6.Google Scholar

Lo Bianco, Joseph 2014a. Asia and Anglosphere: public symbolism and language policy in Australia, in Murray, Neil and Scarino, Angela (eds.), Dynamic Ecologies, pp. 59–74. (Multilingual Education vol. 9), Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lo Bianco, Joseph 2014b. Dialogue between ELF and the field of language policy and planning, Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 3(1): 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lo Bianco, Joseph and Aliani, Renata 2013. Language Planning and Student Experiences: Intention, Rhetoric and Implementation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lo Bianco, Joseph and Slaughter, Yvette 2009. Second Languages and Australian Schooling. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar

Lo Bianco, Joseph, Liddicoat, Anthony J. and Chantal, Crozet (eds.) 1999. Striving for the Third Place: Intercultural Competence through Language Education. Melbourne: Language Australia.Google Scholar

Lord, Robert 1987. Language policy and planning in Hong Kong: past, present and (especially) future, in Lord, Robert and Cheng, Helen N. L. (eds.), Language Education in Hong Kong, pp. 3–24. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar

Low, Ee-Ling 2010. English in Singapore and Malaysia: similarities and differences, in Andy Kirkpatrick (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes, pp. 229–46. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

Low, Ee Ling 2012. Singapore English, in Ee-Ling Low and Azirah Hashim (eds.), English in Southeast Asia: Features, Policy and Language in Use [Varieties of English Around the World], pp. 35–54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Low, Ee-Ling and Brown, Adam 2005. English in Singapore: An Introduction. Singapore: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Low, Ee-Ling and Hashim, Azirah (eds.) 2012. English in Southeast Asia: Features, Policy and Language in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Low, Ee-Ling, Grabe, Esther and Nolan, Francis 2000. Quantitative characteristics of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English, Language and Speech 43(4): 377–88.Google Scholar

Lowenberg, Peter Harper 1984. English in the Malay archipelago: nativization and its functions in a sociolinguistic area (unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Lu, Guoyao 1985. Mingdai Guanhua ji qi Jichu Fangyan Wenti’ (The Guanhua of the Min Dynasty and its Dialect Foundation), Najing University Journal 4. Also in Lu, Guoyao 1994, Lu Guoyao Zixuanji (Self-selected papers of Lu Guoyao), pp. 292–302.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington 1835. ‘Minute on education’ report in Henry, Sharp (ed.), Selections from the Educational Records, Calcutta: Bureau of Education, 1920; Report by the Manager of Publications, Government of India. Delhi: National Archives, 1965, pp 107–17.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, Christopher 2004. Policy entrepreneurship in Australia: a conceptual review and application, Australian Journal of Political Science 39(2): 367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madhavi, V. 2009. A phonetic study of strong forms and weak forms in Telugu English (unpublished MA dissertation). The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad.Google Scholar

Mahanta, S. 2001. Some aspects of prominence in Assamese and Assamese English (unpublished MA dissertation). CIE and FL, Hyderabad.Google Scholar

Mahboob, Ahmar 2002. “No English, No future!’’ Language policy in Pakistan, in Obeng, Samuel Gyasi and Hartford, Beverly (eds.), Political Independence with Linguistic Servitude: The Politics about Languages in the Developing World, pp. 15–39. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar

Mahboob, Ahmar 2004. Pakistani English: morphology and syntax, in Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie and Clive Upton (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English: Morphology and Syntax, pp. 1045–57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Mahboob, Ahmar 2009. English as an Islamic language: a case study of Pakistani English, World Englishes 28(2): 175–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahboob, Ahmar and Nadra, Huma Ahmar 2004. Pakistani English: phonology, in Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie and Clive Upton (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool, pp. 1003–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahesh, M. 2014. Rhythm and intonation in Malayalam (unpublished doctoral thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.Google Scholar

Mair, Christian 2007. British English/American English grammar: convergence in writing – divergence in speech?, Anglia 125(1): 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mak, Bernie Chun Nam and Chui, Hin Leung 2013. A cultural approach to small talk: a double-edged sword of sociocultural reality during socialization into the workplace, Journal of Multicultural Discourses 8(2): 118–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025 2013. Retrieved July 24, 2015 from http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Malaysia/Malaysia_Blueprint.pdf.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Andrew March 10, 2011. Australia’s Prime Minister Julia Gillard: there is a reason the world always looks to America, Top of the Ticket, Los Angeles Times, Online version. Retrieved March 14, 2014 from http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/03/julia-gillard-australia-prime-minister-speech-to-u-s-congress-.html.Google Scholar

Mansoor, Sabiha 1993. Punjabi, Urdu, English in Pakistan: A Sociolinguistic Study. Lahore: Vanguard.Google Scholar

Mansoor, Sabiha 2005. Language Planning in Higher Education: A Case Study of Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mansoor, Sabiha, Hussain, Nasreen, Aliya, Sikandar and Asham, Nasreen M. (eds.) 2009. Emerging Issues in TEFL: Challenges for South Asia. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mansoor, Sabiha, Meraj, Shaheen and Tahir, Aliya (eds.) 2004. Language Policy, Planning and Practice: A South Asian Perspective. Karachi: Aga Khan University and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, Peter W., Ozog, Conrad and Poedjosoedarmo, Gloria (eds.) 1996. Language Use and Language Change in Brunei Darussalam. Athens: Ohio University Centre for International Studies.Google Scholar

Masica, Colin P. 1966. The Sound System of General Indian English. Hyderabad: CIEFL.Google Scholar

Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Masica, Colin P. 1991. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Masica, Colin and Dave, R. B. 1972. The Sound System of Indian English [Monograph 4]. Hyderabad: CIE and FL.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna and Elina, Ranta (eds.) 2009. English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and Findings. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

McKinsey, T. 2010. Capturing the World’s Emerging Middle Class. New York: McKinsey Quarterly.Google Scholar

Mehrotra, Raja Ram 1982. Indian English: a sociolinguistic profile, in John Pride (ed.), New Englishes, pp. 150–173. Rowley/London/Tokyo: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar

Meih Ah Laser Disc Co. Ltd. 1998. Troublesome Night 3. Hong Kong.Google Scholar

Meiraba, T. 2014. Prosodic phonology of Meite-lol (unpublished doctoral thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend and Bhatt, Rakesh M. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milner, Anthony 1999. Asia, and Asian studies, in Australia, Asian Studies Review 23(2): 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milner, Anthony 2003. Who created Malaysia’s plural society? Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 76(2): 1–24.Google Scholar

Milner, Anthony 2011a. Analysing Asian regionalism: what is an architectural perspective? Australian Journal of International Affairs 65(1): 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milner, Anthony 2011b. The Malays. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ministry of Culture, People’s Republic of China 2013. Chinese Ghost Culture. ChinaCulture.org. Retrieved March 13, 2014 from www1.chinaculture.org/gb/en_chinaway/2004-03/17/content_46337.htm.Google Scholar

Ministry of Education 2012. Preliminary Report Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia.Google Scholar

Ministry of Higher Education 2012. The National Graduate Employability Blueprint 2012–2017. Retrieved June 29, 2014 from http://jpt.mohe.gov.my/PENGUMUMAN/GE%20blueprint%202012-2017.pdf.Google Scholar

Moeliono, Anton M. 1993. The first efforts to promote and develop Indonesian, in Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.), The Earliest Stage of Language Planning: The First Congress, pp. 129–42. New York: Phenomenon.Google Scholar

Mohamed Pitchay Gani bin Mohamed Abdul Aziz 2009. Legasi Bahasa Melayu. Singapore: Asas 50 Press [also known as Angkatan Sasterawan 50].Google Scholar

Mohan, Lal Sam and Wang, Xiaomei 2012. Ethnolinguistic vitality of minority communities in a multilingual society: a comparative study of the Chinese and Indians in Malaysia, Journal of Chinese Sociolinguistics 2: 11–29.Google Scholar

Mohsin, Moni 2009. My intended never takes tension. Friday Times (September 25, 2009), p. 22.Google Scholar

Monitor 2010. South Asia Monitor No. 148 (09 December). Center for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved from http://csis.org/files/publication/sam_148.pdfGoogle Scholar

Montolalu, Lucy R. and Suryadinata, Leo 2007. National language and nation building, in Guan, Lee Hock and Suryadinata, Leo (eds.), Language, Nation and Development, pp. 39–50. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar

Morioka, Kenji 1999. Obunkundoku no Kenkyu (A Study on Translation Reading of European Languages). Tokyo: Meijishoin.Google Scholar

Mozumi, Jitsuo 1989. Yogokyojuhoshikenkyu (A Study on the History of Methodologies for Teaching Western Languages). Tokyo: Gakubunsha.Google Scholar

Mufwene, S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mun, Lee Yen 2014. Muhyiddin: English pass to be compulsory at public universities. The Star online. Retrieved September 28, 2014 from www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2014/09/02/muhyiddin-yassin-english-must-pass-subject-at-public-universities/?style=biz.Google Scholar

Mustafa, Zubeida 2011. Tyranny of Language: The Problem and Its Solution. Karachi: Ushba Publishing.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol 1972. Choosing a Lingua Franca in an African Capital. Edmonton and Champaign: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol 1983. The negotiation of identities in conversation: a theory of markedness and code choice, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 44: 115–36.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol 1995. Social Motivations for Code-Switching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol 1998. A theoretical introduction to the markedness model, in Myers-Scotton, Carol (ed.), Codes and Consequences: Choosing Linguistic Varieties, pp. 18–38. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagarkar, Kiran 2008. The Language Conflicts: The Politics and Hostilities between English and the Regional Languages in India. (Meditations of Neighbours, Writer-zealots, Traitors, Translators, and the Common Man.) (Unpublished typescript quoted here with the permission of the author [2013]).Google Scholar

Naik, M. K. 1982. A History of Indian English Literature. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.Google Scholar

Nair, N. G. 1996. Indian English Phonology: A Case Study of Malayalee English. New Delhi: Prestige Books.Google Scholar

Nakano, Koichi (ed.) 2010. Kotogakko Koten: Kanbun-hen (Classic Literature for High Schools: Classical Chinese). Tokyo: Kirihara shoten.Google Scholar

Nakano, Michiko, Kondo, Yusuke, Owada, Kazuharu, Ueda, Norifumi and Yoshida, Satoshi 2012. Proceedings from English Language Education as a Lingua Franca in Asia. The Asian Conference on Education 2012. Nagoya, Japan: The International Academic Forum 2012. Retrieved from http://iafor.org/archives/proceedings/ACE/ACE2012_proceedings.pdf.Google Scholar

Nanyang Siang Pau 2013. 南洋社论: 国小教华淡文的反思. Retrieved November 23, 2013 from www.nanyang.com/node/221298.Google Scholar

Narita, Hajime 2013. Nihonjin ni Fusawashii Eigokyoiku (English Language Teaching Suited for the Japanese). Tokyo: Shohakusha.Google Scholar

National Statistics Office 2013. National Quickstat for December 2013. Retrieved January 7, 2014 from www.census.gov.ph/statistics/quickstat/national-quickstat/2013/%2A.Google Scholar

National University of Singapore 2013. Print Media Coverage. Retrieved September 14, 2013 from http://newshub.nus.edu.sg/news/1305/index.php?type=print.Google Scholar

Nayab, Durre 2011. Estimating the Middle Class in Pakistan. Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics [PIDE] Working Papers.Google Scholar

Nelson, Gerald 2002. International Corpus of English: The Singapore Corpus User Manual. Retrieved May 14, 2013 from www-bcf.usc.edu/~billmann/diversity/ICE-SIN_Manual.PDF.Google Scholar

Nelson, Gerald 2005. Expressing future time in Philippine English, in Dayag, Danilo T. and Quakenbush, J. Stephen (eds.), Linguistics and Language Education in the Philippines and Beyond: Festschrift in Honor of Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista, pp. 41–59. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar

Nemade, Bhalchandra 1984. The concept of nativism, New Quest, 45: 133–7.Google Scholar

Nespor, Marina and Vogel, Irene 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Nesselhauf, Nadja 2009. Co-selection phenomena across new Englishes: parallels (and differences) to foreign learner varieties, English World-Wide 30(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

New Straits Times 2013, August 16. Ulama push for top PAS posts. New Straits Times. Retrieved August 16, 2013 from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-218576821.html.Google Scholar

Nelson, Gerald February 29, 2012. Voting is compulsory: Pahang Mufti. Retrieved July 30, 2015 from http://www.malaysia-today.net/voting-is-compulsory-pahang-mufti/.Google Scholar

Nihalani, Paroo, Tongue, , Ray, K. and Hosali, Priya 1979. Indian and British English: A Handbook of Usage and Pronunciation. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nilep, Chad 2006. Code switching in sociocultural linguistics, Colorado Research in Linguistics 19: 1–22.Google Scholar

Nobel Prize Committee 1913. Retrieved January 15, 2014 from www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates.Google Scholar

Norman, Jerry 1988. Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oda, Masaki 2013. Native speaker models or World Englishes?: developing an English language program for a Japanese university. Paper presented at the IAWE 2013: World Englishes in the Multilingual World, Arizona State University, USA.Google Scholar

OED 2014. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Office of Leading Team of Chinese Language Usage Survey 2006. Zhongguo Yuyan Wenzi Shiyong Qingkuang Diaocha Ziliao (Materials on Chinese Language Usage Survey). Beijing: Language and Culture Press.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. J. and Gilbert, J. B. 1979. Listeners’ ability to identify languages by their prosody, in Léon, Pierre and Rossi, M. (eds.), Problèmes de Prosodie, Vol. II, pp. 123–31. Ottawa: Didier.Google Scholar

Okudaira, Akiko 1999. A study on international communication in regional organisations: the use of English as the “official” language of ASEAN, Asian Englishes 2(1): 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ooi, Vincent 2001. Upholding standards or passively observing language?: corpus evidence and the Concentric Circles Model, in Ooi, Vincent (ed.), Evolving Identities: The English Language in Singapore and Malaysia, pp. 168–83. Singapore: Times Academic Press.Google Scholar

Osman, Nabil 2010. Kleines Lexikon deutscher Wörter arabischer Herkunft. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Ostler, Nicholas 2005. Empires of the Word: A Language History of the World. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Ostler, Nicholas 2010. The Last Lingua Franca. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Otani, Yasuteru 2007. Nihonjin ni Totte Eigo Towa Nanika (What does the English Language Mean to the Japanese?). Tokyo: Taishukan shoten.Google Scholar

Otsu, Yukio, Erikawa, Haruo, Saito, Yoshifumi and Torikai, Kumiko 2013. Eigokyoiku, Semarikuru Hatan (English Language Education: Approaching Catastrophe). Tokyo: Hitsuji shobo.Google Scholar

Pakir, Anne 1986. A linguistic investigation of Baba Malay (unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Hawaii.Google Scholar

Pakir, Anne 1991. The range and depth of English-knowing bilinguals in Singapore, World Englishes 10: 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pakir, Anne 1998. Language and society, in Alsagoff, Lubna, Bao, Zhiming, Pakir, Anne and Wee, Lionel (eds.), Society, Style and Structure in Language, pp. 3–107. Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Pakir, Anne 2004. English-knowing bilingualism in Singapore, in Choon, Ban Kah, Pakir, Anne and Kiong, Tong Chee (eds.), Imagining Singapore (2nd edn.), pp. 254–78. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press by Marshall Cavendish.Google Scholar

Pandey, Pramod 1981 [1994]. On a description of the phonology of Indian English, CIE and FL Bulletin 17: 11–9. [Also in R. K. Agnihotri and A. L. Khanna (eds.), Second Language Acquisition: Socio-cultural and Linguistic Aspects of English in India, pp. 198–207. New Delhi: Sage Publications.]Google Scholar

Pandey, Pramod 1985. Word accentuation in Hindustani English in relation to Hindustani and English (unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Poona, Pune.Google Scholar

Pandey, Pramod 2014. Sounds and Their Patterns in Indic Languages (vol. 1). New Delhi: CUP India.Google Scholar

Pandit, Prabodh B. 1972. India as a Sociolinguistic Area. Pune: University of Poona.Google Scholar

Pattanayak, Debi Prasanna 1981. Multilingualism and Mother Tongue Education. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pavlenko, Aneta 2006. Russian as a lingua franca, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 26: 78–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

PEELI 2013. Can English Medium Education Work in Pakistan? Lessons from Punjab. Islamabad: The British Council.Google Scholar

Phan, Le-Ha, Kho, Joyce and Chng, Brendan 2013. Nation building, English as an international language, medium of instruction, and language debate: Malaysia and possible ways forward, Journal of International and Comparative Education [E] 2(2): 58–71.Google Scholar

Phoon, Hooi San, Abdullah, Anna Christina and MacLagan, Margaret. 2013. The consonant realization of Malay-, Chinese- and Indian-influenced Malaysian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 33 (1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pickering, Lucy and Wiltshire, Caroline R. 2000. Pitch accent in Indian-English teaching discourse, World Englishes 19(2): 173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. B. 1980. The phonetics and phonology of English intonation (unpublished doctoral thesis). Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar

Pillai, Stefanie, Zuraidah, Mohd. Don, Knowles, Gerald and Tang, Jennifer 2010. Malaysian English: an instrumental analysis of vowel contrasts, World Englishes 29(2): 159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Planet 2009. Radio Pakistan-FM-94. Retrieved 29 July 2015 from http://www.planet94.com.Google Scholar

Platt, John and Weber, Heidi 1980. English in Singapore and Malaysia: Status, Features, Functions. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar